2023 Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Jumbo Extra-Thin 16202ST.OO.1240ST.02 Audemars Piguet Watch Review

Contact Team Mosso for pricing and availability.
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Shop all Audemars Piguet watches: www.thewatchbox.com/watches/a...
SKU: 4830709
The Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" Extra-Thin 16202ST.OO.1240ST.02 is encased in 39mm of stainless steel surrounding a blue Petite Tapisserie dial on a stainless steel bracelet. Features of this Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" include hours, minutes, and date. This Audemars Piguet watch also measures 8.1mm in thickness and 49mm from lug-to-lug.
For complete details, watch the full Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" review.
Please subscribe to our channel: kzbin.info...
See our inventory, along with news and content from across the industry on our app: onelink.to/watchbox-app
Visit thewatchbox.com for new arrivals, updated daily.

[@ImranManikuj]

Wonderful watch with amazing doll in set colour.

[@kenchow1142]

love it! my dream watch

[@saniamurtaza7519]

Lovely watch style👍👍 very beautiful design

[@Imtiazahmed561]

Amazing 😍

[@ZeeshanKhan-qm9uv]

Wonderful

[@rolandthanksjesus4733]

Beautiful Watch

[@Yamin-nw2so]

Awesome

[@thedonomer]

Beautiful ❤️

[@guryashabnamshabnamfahim811]

Great

[@sohaibsajid586]

Very nice 👍

[@WorldofNSB]

Wow dial

[@Imtiazahmed561]

Nice 👍

[@aurangzebkhan1369]

Nice watch

[@samrinstarkaa25]

Nice

[@surferbuoy4690]

GRAIL!!!

[@AnasAmin-hc3gv]

Nice chain

[@axleD17]

Beautiful

[@adventurewithhadi5846]

Wow

[@tayyabnawaz6060]

It's So Good MashALLAH❤

[@antyjacky-bt8tf]

Good

[@anique1990]

Classic AP

[@aurangzebkhan1369]

good

[@jerdonsbabbler3515]

The tapisserie (sp?) on the 15202 is more refined, somehow. The little squares look smaller?

[@ayeshafaizan5232]

❤❤

[@hieudang4849]

Tim, you should do a versus video between this model, Moser Streamliner AND/OR the PP Nautilus!!!!

[@AftabAhmedSahtoSahab-vj7it]

🥰🥰

[@uzmakainat2197]

😎

[@johnriesling2207]

the 15202 (more so the 1st gen 15202) seems like more hand finishing went into its production. each edition of the royal oak gradually loses it's magic due to cost cutting and profit optimization.

[@rey_s90]

The movement is much nicer int he 15202! The 16202 however is more practical.

[@cyan0xide]

nice prx

[@ozzy1154]

LOL

[@abdullahjan9914]

Breitling keeps winning it for me

[@johnwheat5199]

Do you know what, I just don't get the Royal Oak. It's reputably uncomfortable to wear, and what are those ridiculous hexagonal screws seated in hexagonal slots all about?

[@deathunter2410]

Much prefer the 15202. AP is definitely going the wrong direction with movement finishing like this and the Hublot homages.

[@PapriceP]

If you dont have access to Hublot at retail you may have to settle for an AP homage.

[@mikejones-dx8bx]

Agreed. With each RO iteration, AP devotes less effort to hand-finishing. The last true high-quality RO is the 15202 first-generation which ceased production in 2011. It's been downhill for RO quality since.

[@ImranManikuj]

So tired of integrated bracelets

[@FantaconeBoxWorks]

I don’t get it.

[@zakisarker]

2023 model but already has a clearly visible scratch on the bezel, ouch!

[@loaded2820]

Good. That means the owner was wearing it, like he should.

[@rahult5170]

Oh no. It was worn nitwit

[@dorsehick3034]

Meant to be worn not locked in a safe.

[@possessedslig]

The sooner you get the first scratch out of the way the sooner you can start really enjoying it

[@UserKR13]

Its a steel sports watch. If you are worried about a scratch on it, you will probably never be in a position to own any AP.

[@AdamEve-ie3yr]

Looks dry.

[@mikejones-dx8bx]

throw some lube on it

[@johnriesling2207]

put some lube on it then

[@donaleeesio]

Does anyone ever ask themselves why would they need so much microscopic detailing regardless if it's handmade or machine made when it's not visible to the naked eye and it's a hassle to even look at it through the lens! Moreover in a timepiece like this which is unattractive on the outside in essence and extremely overrated only because it was designed differently by someone with Italian last name to be only different from mainstream designs!

[@jerdonsbabbler3515]

Umm...alright:)

[@johnriesling2207]

you don't get it. stick to your seiko, or tudor, or rolex.

[@YtShortsediting99]

Great

[@irfanmurtaza.]

Nice

[@JackoWillMakeLives-loveu]

So tired of integrated bracelets

[@JackoWillMakeLives-loveu]

Wait who did my comment🙄🫤😑

[@dotdash9516]

So tired of Stan's comments

[@mikejones-dx8bx]

take a nap then