Water Fluoridation: History, Side Effects and Activism.mp4

[@Mancow1973]

Awesome video! Lot's of great information here, good job!

[@JordieBogart]

2c. level to adjust fluoride in the water is in fact .7 parts fluoride per million parts dihydrogen monoxide; this has been shown to help in the prevention of dental caries while preventing fluoride. The reason for which dental fluorosis was starting to become so prominent by the late 80's is because of the amount of oral care products being used containing high levels of fluoride coupled with the environmental factors was equating to slightly too much fluoride.

[@JordieBogart]

Anyway, I am glad you want to know both sides.I have been researching both sides myself for a few years now. I have read quite a few papers on the neurotoxicity of fluoride, the harmful effects of ingesting too much over the course of a life time, and even the effects of slightly too much [5 ppm and up].Furthermore, even though we don't have evidence that fluoride is bad at or around .7 ppm [mg/l], I don't think it is evidence that it is safe; instead, we need to keep searching for problems. :)

[@MrJgates79]

Thanks for all of your comments, Jordie. I do disagree with some of what you said, based on my research of dozens of Scientific studies. I, honestly, appreciate your input and will look into your comments. I had hours of videos, studies, comments, quotes, etc to sift through and I wanted, nothing more than, to keep this video factually accurate. Thanks again and feel free to share any info with me.

[@JordieBogart]

2b. If it were as bad as they want you to think, there would be no need to leave such things out.

[@MrJgates79]

Thank you for watching the video, Jordie. Please let me know of the "lies, over-exaggeration and misinformation" in detail. I'm not being a smart-ass. I just want all sides of the story... and I won't call you "pathetic".

[@JordieBogart]

2a. fluoride toxicity. What's more, the poison control seems to be only in America and is a precautionary measure; better safe than sorry.

[@JordieBogart]

1a.First off, the guy talking about toothpaste doesn't tell you it is not the fluoride that you swallow that is the risk in the toothpaste for which you need to call poison control. but instead it is the antibacterial agents, scrubbing agents, preservatives, foaming agents and other chemicals; and then he gleefully equates it to drinking a glass of water. That is dishonest and a sneaky way to trick people into believing him. If it were the fluoride, you would need a whole tube to cause(con't)

[@JordieBogart]

1c. The assertion by the guy at 1:50 saying that the 'safety standards for water fluoridation is based on 'fraudulent science' is an outright lie… I have personally read many papers in which safety is outlined and the science is in no way 'fraudulent' and instead is replicable. I can go on further through this video, but it is pointless as all these objections have been thoroughly debunked and are really non-issues. The problem of fluorosis is pretty much over now as the new accepted(cont

[@JordieBogart]

MrJgates, I want to start by saying that I didn't call you personally pathetic and was merely calling the fear-mongers tactics pathetic. Instead of producing sound science backing up their assertions, they resort to such dishonest rhetoric.

[@JordieBogart]

The fact that people are actually stupid enough to fall for such propaganda is ridiculous.....