Water is wet | 16 Personalities meme

Join our MBTI Discord server:
/ discord
___________________________________________
Avatar:
- ENTJ
- INTP
- ENTP
- INTJ
They were debating about water. Who would win?
___________________________________________
AUDIO:
• Water is Wet
Outro song:
Daystar - Lemon Cake / • ✨샛별 - 🍋Lemon Cake🍰✨ (R...
___________________________________________
My socials (Instagram, Twitter, etc.):
cloumello.carr...
Support me on
Ko-fi: ko-fi.com/clou...
Tags:
#MBTI #MBTImemes #16personalities #ENTJ #INTP #ENTP #INTJ

[@cloumello.channel]

Heyy thank you so much for the 45K likes! Also, please kindly check out the original audio :D kzbin.info/www/bejne/rGPMqH6vap5pl8ksi=qAtoSiKzSb1xzwZG

[@cacaslogoman]

yo man can you try and make a hxh one

[@nyxanth247]

They're hot

[@andhikafajarms]

INTJ staying silent in the background is so real

[@claracatlady9844]

Yeah just not worth it

[@chiro556]

Yeah, I LOVE this detail.

[@magiveem]

as an entp me and my intp friend were just explaining this to our entj friend and then i see this video-

[@kyurei4478]

Because Ni tells them this debate is simply pointless while ENTP's Ne probably tells them it's fun. It's the opposite. Ni is searching for reaching a point and Ne is seeking entertainment.

[@zaloskog]

@@kyurei4478 As an INTJ I would love to see how these people interact and argue, it's both pointless and fun to watch.

[@Sci.Fi.Typist]

I can just imagine an INFP dumping a bag of ice in the water, saying “now water is wet”, and then leaving before all hell breaks loose

[@Makisetutuloo]

As an INTP, I would argue that water is the liquid form of H2O and ice is the solid form of H2O. Soooo technically, by the definition of wetness, the ice is wet, but water is not wet.

[@Meeepower]

yeaaah no as an INFP i'd either side with INTP cuz she's right and bounce off of ENTP's shenanigans (cuz that's my usual dynamic with my local ENTP)

[@jaden_skywalker]

As an INFP, I'd probably agree with the water isn't wet people.

[@graybonesau]

@@Makisetutuloo And then you'd lose, because water is also the name for H2O.

[@janekaallen7473]

As an INFP. I say water is wet. You can’t tell me if I’m underwater I’m not water

[@ehe6544]

"YOU AREN'T WET! damn right about that" is sending me 🤣

[@Lynnywhereuat007]

Micheal Scott in the background; “That’s what she said!”

[@pixelzebra8440]

If it’s touching itself its wet 💀

[@youtubecommentergal4346]

​@@pixelzebra8440no wonder INTJ got tired of hearing stuff like that and said, “Lord help us.”🤣🤣🤣

[@rictusempra3388]

such an ENTP thing to do 😂 joke in the middle of a fiery argument

[@sunhyolic]

@@pixelzebra8440HELP

[@lunaghost9267]

As an INTJ, I should confirm. I am just standing here, menacingly.

[@maya_wastaken]

Literally same here 😒😔

[@ARH_X_M]

as an ISTP, I can confirm that i would look at them, silently while i make fun of them in my head about how stupid and pathtic they are

[@doqify6189]

I feel like ENTP doesnt really care either way, he just disagrees with ENTJ for the sake of arguing with her lol

[@andres_david25]

Yeah, there are two definitions of "wet", so we ENTPs just side with one or the other given the chance

[@starrrr444]

As an ENTP, yeah that's basically what's up

[@Iloveyou-i9z]

Поэтому я и ненавижу ENTP охх!

[@kate1060]

That's the most ENTP thing an ENTP can do

[@McNugge.]

And this is why entp is the worst mbti, change my mind😂

[@smert_doggie123]

"YoU'Re NoT WEt!" " fucking right about that" got me rollin on the floor

[@meEatBorgur]

as a INTP. I can tell that water isn't dirt.

[@Lynnywhereuat007]

Same! I thought that was common sense.

[@meEatBorgur]

yuh, if you ask me what do I get from watching this video. The dirty isn't wet, too

[@Lynnywhereuat007]

@@meEatBorgur spittin facts over here!

[@stevenhthe21st]

@@meEatBorgur I’d also say that the dirty isn’t water

[@meEatBorgur]

@@stevenhthe21st DAYUM, GENIUS SLAY KWEENS 💅✨️

[@yujie9485]

“Wet” is just a feeling of human. So this is why “Wet” be defined as adjective.

[@elandavenport1534]

No wet is when something is covered or saturated with a liquid such as water

[@Sirawxy]

@@elandavenport1534”the property itself can’t give itself that property”, but wetness is not equal to water percentages, because water content doesn’t define the entire property. Therefore by their own explanation. Water is wet should be a valid statement. However, what actually happened is wetness/ something is wet or not is not necessary a quantifiable thing, as most of the time it’s used to express a sensation.

[@evilhippo887]

@@Sirawxy ??? water amount > 0 = wet seems quantifiable

[@konika.s_headspace]

Water should be considered as wet, because theres also wet ice, and wet air (water vapor). If water's solid and gas form has a wetness too it, its liquid for should be called wet too. Since water is a group of H2O particles closely together, its water covered by itself. Therefore water is wet.

[@MaskedMass]

​@@konika.s_headspace ...No. Something is only "wet" when the quality of the wetness can be removed from whatever surface or entity we're talking about. If something is wet, it can also technically be dried. You cannot "dry" water. You can only dry a surface or entity that has water on/in it. You are removing the thing that gives itself its property. You cannot run a towel across the surface of a pool and then say "The pool is now dry, or more dry, because of what I just did."

[@LeonhardDevinci]

INTJ doesn't argue with idiots, he's not going to waste his energy for nonsense

[@claracatlady9844]

I mean we could probably argue properly with INTP in this case (just for the sake of it). ENTJ is just yelling and not actually delivering any arguments also they won’t change their mind anyways so that is a waste of Energy.

[@fathanyusrizal]

​@@claracatlady9844 i think she did, but INTP just countered it again

[@kyurei4478]

Because Ni is based.

[@claracatlady9844]

@@fathanyusrizal too much yelling for me to hear what’s going on. If you need to yell to “argue” your point then you don’t have a very strong argument

[@Demi_Sukimata]

As an INTJ, I agree with this.

[@artiscommunication.2271]

Why is every personality role and this conversation so accurate??! This is EXACTLY me and my siblings and our opinions lmao

[@cloumello.channel]

Thank you so much for the super thanks!

[@artiscommunication.2271]

@@cloumello.channel No problem! Your animation is awesome.

[@Notsimp]

0:41 "water is touching itself all the damn time. Therefore water is wet." Ayoo??🤨🤨

[@Gabbygrrl]

Same

[@aeea3306]

Same

[@Improvement_Is_Life]

Water: 😳

[@JuniperGal-ek2pu]

BRO

[@Raage.]

I would agree with the ENTJ on that cuz it funni and go straight back to annoying tf outta them - ENTP.

[@edana_qingyuann]

This is the most accurate description of Te and Ti logic

[@jacobdevilliers9485]

As an ENTJ tho I gotta agree with INTP and ENTP

[@dialsforstupid]

​@@jacobdevilliers9485that's because you're smart

[@Fentskii]

What's Te and Ti?

[@yeabsira_MG]

@@Fentskii the cognitive functions

[@elisep9481]

@@yeabsira_MG Te: extraverted thinking. Ti: introverted thinking

[@karmalineanderson37]

As an INTJ, i'd probably stay silent and act like i'm tired of their shit while weighing both sides in my head and get a reality crisis. (And a migraine 2 hours later).

[@elma2410]

real

[@actuallyarjun]

Being in constant doubt of literally everything issa mood😌

[@zoaero]

if i see this in real life i just laugh in the corner silently until they done 😂

[@ramza8355]

As an INTJ, he probably is thinking "Well, it depends on how you see the water. Therefore this debate is nonsense"

[@neath9486]

same (I’m also an INTJ)

[@shellfire6931]

Thank you for making the ENTJ the intelligent one. This was necessary.

[@cassandracaldera7071]

the other one was also intelligent though

[@shellfire6931]

@@cassandracaldera7071 No one who thinks water isn't wet is intelligent.

[@cassandracaldera7071]

​@@shellfire6931 zealots who refuse to believe that there is more than one perception of reality shouldn’t be regarded as intelligent either… of course in a practical sense water is wet but the other idea was nice and playful and made sense too in its own way

[@davidvanaa1191]

​​@@cassandracaldera7071 So basically you are saying ENTJ is the one with common sense right here....huhhh

[@cassandracaldera7071]

@@davidvanaa1191 sure whatever man

[@argon1381]

as an intp i really do say crap like this daily and i love starting arguments 💀

[@shimpiyaa]

Same 💀

[@Swiftkeyprotexter]

it's just so fun ngl 😂

[@Corven512]

same

[@cachalotreal]

i only use groupchats im in to troll my friends

[@scitimas12]

Same, but water is wet when 2+ molecules are present

[@laida_18]

As INTJ, that's me with my Resting Bitch Face. Internally, I'll be feeling tired and hopeless seeing them waste time and energy debating about something so trivial.

[@phoniex_a9096]

Relatable

[@MakingCakesEveryday]

Same

[@sagemaster1357]

INTJ just watching the chaos is relatable.

[@justme8841]

While thinking about who is right 😂

[@gh.05t70]

My response generally amounts to "this argument is pointless"

[@nuhebu]

- you're right on the money. me and engaging in pointless arguments are completely incompatible. - intj

[@Vincent_hearts.u]

As an ENTP, i can confirm i'd 100% agree w/ every single thing my fellow INTPs says and side w/ them. 😋‼️✨

[@magiveem]

SAME LIKE BREAKING PLATES FOR AMBIENT MUSIC- well estp joins us too usually

[@minaashido7176]

YES PREACH SAME HERE😍💯‼️

[@Rin-zd9nv]

Thank you! Finally someone understands us -intp

[@e1nnui]

HEHEHE U ENTPS R SO BASED I LOVE YALL

[@Onnarashi]

Ride or die, ENTP? - INTP

[@sabrinarock2349]

The actual chaos that can cause a riff between Thinkers: Ti VS Te

[@neelam_gulab]

INTP giving Varian vibes with the gloves, and I'm in love

[@TheUltimateLegend7]

TRUE

[@kuroyuuep]

So real

[@Shezieee]

tts fan wows

[@Keirridwen]

the goggles help too, lol

[@sagesparnaaij]

I WAS SAYING THATTTT

[@Kyzoned]

as an INTJ, this is so real, but mainly because I don't know how to initiate or engage in conversation

[@inkubus6192]

Right? We’re standing on the sidelines either because we don’t care to jump in, or just don’t know how to jump in.

[@luciac44]

I love it. I agree with my two ENTP and INTP fellas. (I can't argue with an ENTJ myself) -INFJ

[@kyurei4478]

You can very well argue by using Fe.

[@Iloveyou-i9z]

Да потому что я всегда права! Какого хрена я не права?я не могу воспринять свою "не правоту"

[@RedIsntHome]

I am an INTP and say water is wet.Come join us,lol

[@elina6045]

I love INFJs - INFP

[@luciac44]

@@kyurei4478 Maybe could succeed maybe not 😓

[@aishiteruyovivi]

As an ENTJ, this is insanely accurate. I could easily see myself doing the exact same things in the exact same argument.

[@Cyhcg5uhgb]

Same, the slight agression is on point

[@KUR4H]

I agree

[@drmohammadkhairaljarrah7809]

Right and if they said water is wet i would have probably gone the other way around 🌛

[@cloudy_rose3115]

IKR, I would argue until they left the room. Then I would follow them out the room to continue the argument.

[@NiTeLightYears]

Water is wet, in fact, it is a wet substance, indeed, it is, in matter of fact, wet, as stated, they are a wet substance, indeed, and it is wet.

[@Soy_boi]

I wish there were more videos like this, with just the 4 analysts arguing over stupid shit. Like, people build us up like we are supervillains, but as someone from a house of almost all analysts, we actually spend half of our time just going on long philosophical and scientific debates about EVERYTHING. -an INTP

[@chill_phil4457]

hol up, wait, INTP has a point 🤔 -ENFP

[@masadarkazally6188]

I agreed upon the second he pulled up the chart 🗿 entj is dum for not doing so - ENFP (also hello there enfp sibling)

[@Renaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiii]

yeah, make sense😂😂 -enfp

[@YasmineGraystone]

'Course I have a point. -INTP

[@kyurei4478]

Aren't you supposed to find a point in what ENTJ is saying and me to agree with INTP 🤭? -INFJ

[@juliannakolodziejczyk]

Yuppp - enfp

[@SuhairaMunasSabah]

I confirm that I loved watching my fellows Analysts argue about something by using the same logic multiple times in different wording. - INTJ

[@MishalAli-ep8vs]

So true I almost never want to be in a argument that doesn't involve me or benefit me in any way I do not want to get involved in the argument and just watch -INTJ

[@wa6488]

YES, I LOVE THAT SO MUCH - ENFP

[@kyurei4478]

I almost never want to be in an argument that doesn't involve others or doesn't benefit others in some way. I don't even want to watch, it's stressful -INFJ

[@MishalAli-ep8vs]

WOW a infj never met one of those before nice to meet you. Question how do you hate humanity but at the same time want the best for them? -INTJ

[@GodAlmightyMahaDev]

I Am Liking Yall Keep It Up, I Just Wanted To Experience Life With My Breath -INTJ/INFJ

[@MishalAli-ep8vs]

What do you mean by that -INTJ

[@gojos_glasses_]

as an ENTP myself im glad im represented so accurately here 1:17 lol (and represented as a pretty boy in a suit nonetheless

[@FiveTen007]

wet is the process of being exposed and affected by liquid, water isn't wet, it is liquid

[@kuroyuuep]

This.

[@Lingeringfrost]

Real

[@somethingelse2814]

Within this frame, water isn't wet, but it is wetness.

[@gloriasalgado5707]

As a intp this made me think that there is still hope in the world

[@somethingelse2814]

How specific do we want to get? Wet isn't a process. It's a state. It is a state most closely tied to the touch sensation of a liquid. What you are describing is saturation. The wetness one feels is actually the sensation of the liquid itself, so liquid water both causes and is wetness. Water can also be solid (ice) and thus dry. So if water can be dry, then mustn't it also have the capacity to be wet? Yes. Additionally, can liquid water be wetted with other liquids? Yes. Liquid water is wet because it is a liquid, and wet is a definitional quality of liquid and not of the object being described as wet.

[@RoxanaZj]

The point is whether the definition of ‘wet’ implies the process of changing from dry to wet, in the same vein, like whether the dirt is ‘dirty’. So the discussion is either right on both sides, or meaningless. But the process of thinking about this topic is interesting anyway. - Love from INTJ

[@KuroDHero]

But in the question 'is water wet' its already conceded that we're talking about wet as an adjective not as a verb Also adding silica dust to water can separate it from itself and is then called dry water

[@tylerian4648]

Water is a wetting agent as it can make things wet. An agent of a property has that property. For example, oxidizing agents can oxidize other chemicals because they are oxidized themselves. Therefore water is wet. Alternatively, wetness is often defined as the water content of a substance, in which case water is maximally wet when it is pure.

[@Ayukikayunimous]

AYYY THE ANALYTICS 🕺🕺🕺

[@staerfish]

Analysts..?

[@cachalotreal]

never knew im a 📊

[@Sirawxy]

The analytics should realise wetness doesn’t have to come from water…

[@Digital_Rust]

The best argument is: If water can't be dry, then it can't be wet. Because they are complimentary states. Therefore water isn't wet.

[@naruto11325]

but dry water is a thing

[@noname-lb3sg]

The voice fit entj perfectly and she looks so pretty in your art style

[@meme.banger]

Tf you guys arguing about? ENTJ stated water is wet based on it's "form" (liquid) as they has Se cognitive function. Perceiving thing as the way it looks like. ENTP and INTP using Si as how they reasoning and providing explanations from the basic components of water itself, not based on what can be seen (not Se user). This is MBTI Content, see how each MBTI has different perception based on their cognitive function, although it is possible that they can learn how Si user thinks and perceives things. - ENTJ

[@mpreciouss]

This.

[@y53r1sliv1ng]

exactly yes

[@kemiazubike5062]

Everyone: Listening to the argument about water not being wet Me: Casually simps on all character designs

[@Nesyulett]

Me too

[@KiraiKatsuji]

My man i found kindered soul

[@0OB08O]

I'm an INTJ and just staying in the background when others have dumb arguments is so relatable (not than other types are dumb, just some people). When my class was planning stuff for the graduation they acted like all the teachers were against them and only defending the other class. I just nodded when they were talking to me but I swear I couldn't understand why they felt so attacked for not getting everything they wanted. When I was alone with the teachers I would talk about how weird they were for a bunch of adults (first time year of adulthood, of course, but even then...)

[@JustxxStella]

As an INTP, INTP has a point-

[@alwonder3208]

Before watching this video, I didn't even realize that someone would question this point, lol 😅

[@agchains78543]

As an INTP, the INTP is fucking wrong.

[@OneSpicyLoaf]

​@@agchains78543 as a fellow INTP i can agree, this INTP has been lobotomized

[@lelandholmquist2467]

@@agchains78543as another INTP your wrong

[@Joenah5]

@LxnaMothas an intp, no u

[@sneakysileny]

1:35 This part is so well animated, I fell in love with this channel

[@kingarubin]

As an ENTP, that was my exact reaction as the video started, especially since I had an entire discussion with my friend if water is wet and we decided the same thing as they are saying

[@RaihanBrine]

If something is dry, it can get wet. Can water be dry? Interestingly, YES! That's proof that water is wet. Looks up Action Lab dry water experiment or something, I don't remember the actual name of the video. - INFP

[@adriancarlito8830]

Wetness is defined as consisting of or covered in liquid, so water is indeed wet. But if you define it scientifically, then it's a solid surface covered in liquid. So surprisingly, both of you can be correct depending on the context.

[@SmokescreenTfp]

1:43 have ur dammn mins mind

[@TiredVillian]

As an INTP I can confirm water ain't wet and dust ain't dusty.

[@inkubus6192]

F### you mean, dust ain’t dusty!? F### out of here with your clean, immaculate dust!

[@tetrachart4156]

I, an INTP define "wet" as "something with noticeably higher concentration of water within it or it's surface then it's usual" while "dry" is having a noticeably lower concentration. Since Water is nearly 100% water, its concentration of water is never "much higher" then it's usual. Therefore, water is at least not THAT definition of "wet".

[@yian95954]

I don't know if water is wet or not, but why dust isn't dusty? 🤔

[@thesocialistsarecoming8565]

Counterpoint, water can be made hydrophobic. If something can be hydrophobic, then it can be dry because it will not in such a state come into contact with water in the sense that would make it 'wet'. Therefore, it would be fair to say that water is wet. Unless it is specifically made hydrophobic and therefore dry. -the INTJ's thoughts while they watch the argument and contribute nothing to it.

[@LawsRealm]

As an INTP myself I would ask the ENTJ to show me references for the definition of 'wet' and check if water being on anything is considered wet or anything other than water.

[@KuroDHero]

Marriam webster currently lists 'consisting of a liquid (such as water)' as one of the definitions of wetness

[@RaihanBrine]

Are water dry then?

[@KuroDHero]

@@RaihanBrine just look at that actionlab video you mentioned

[@RaihanBrine]

@@KuroDHero Quite baffling, right? If something have a dry state, then that means it have a wet state. It's like if someone is alive, they can die, so what about undead?

[@tylerian4648]

​@@KuroDHerosome would say that pure water is 100% wet.

[@HappyError]

The way I look at it is an individual water molecule is not wet but has the property to make whatever it touches wet, so if you have a little as two water molecules touching then that makes them wet. So water in essence isn't wet but any grouping of it like a glass of water is.

[@turtlepack2023]

Facts!

[@PeachDragon_]

To be wet is to be drenched in liquid, you can't drench a liquid in liquid as they either mix or separate. Liquids cannot be wet, because they are liquid, only non-liquids can be wet.

[@entropy8634]

⁠@@PeachDragon_why CANT you drench liquid with a liquid? Why is it necessary for wetness to exclude separation or mixture?

[@Qofkidwhrbd]

​@@entropy8634bro is mad lol.

[@DeathlyLight]

Nah, a grouping of water can't make itself wet either, because when water is grouped it bonds with itself with hydrogen bonds, it effectively becomes just a larger water, ergo cannot make itself wet.

[@elenacottica386]

INTP here who always argued that water isn't wet I feel represented

[@Ocro555]

Noo wayy, Cloumello is back?? The 20 second ad is still playing but I can guarantee that this is going to be yet another great video! edit: Yep it indeed is, I absolutely love how relatable the black haired girl is lol, we all have that one mf in our lives who cuss the fiercest and is the most aggressive in defending their points yet have basically no logic and refuses to listen to contradicting evidences and "what am I speaking? CHYY-NEESE?" was hilarious for some reason And also, great art as usual lmao

[@hidum5779]

just use the brave browser dude.

[@DisqueArgente]

Fun fact: humans can't actually feel that things are wet, we just feel the temperature difference. This is why sometimes when you wash your hands, you feel like they're still wet, but it's just that they're colder than usual. (From an INTP)

[@MarshyMell]

Could I just say you’ve improved a lot? Like the MBTI designs r so much fun (esp the INTP design im obsessed with the goggles, fit and hair), and the poses, expressions and line art, also the colours look so good.

[@plastictouch6796]

A fire is hot because to touch fire is to become hot. It is therefore a property of the substance itself. So it is also that property. Same as other sources of heat can be hot and other liquids can be wet. Water does not impart wetness, it is wetness. And thereby things that have water become wet because water is what is wet. Water is wet so by having water on you you also become wet because you have water on you, the water has become a part of you and thereby you have gained it's innate quality of wetness.

[@DeathlyLight]

That logic doesn't really track because fire being hot isn't at all the same as something being wet. In a fire, chemical bonds breaking during combustion, results in a radiation of heat. Fire is the physical manifestation of that heat being released through combustion. Fire is hot because fire is literally heat. Wetness, in contrast, is simply generated by an object being covered in water. Wet being defined as: "covered or saturated with water or another liquid." Water cannot cover itself, when separate collections of water meet, they form hydrogen bonds and become a larger collection of water. Surface tension due to these strong bonds excludes anything else from entering that collective, thus water collects on surfaces or seeps into them and makes them wet. Water cannot cover water. Water makes things wet, it is not literally wet.

[@redwolf344]

@@DeathlyLight I would aruge that a single water molicule would cover itself as a water moclicule cannot be seperate from itself othewise it is not a water molicule. alternitivly If something has to be covered in a liquid to be wet then wouldn't that make the liquid the wetness? that would imply that the wetness is not wet. which is paradoxal. Also how can you give a physical property without first having that property? how can you make something hot (giving it high energy) without first being hot (having high energy)? how can you dye something red without the dye first being red? In order to give something a physical property like being wet the thing that gives it that property must also have the property. If you don't have an apple you cannot give someone an apple. if you don't posess the property of wetness you cannot give wetness.

[@Zetact_]

@@DeathlyLight Wetness is also a chemical property of the hydrogen bonds. Also by the definition of "saturated with a liquid", water is already saturated with a liquid, that being itself. It does not need to "cover itself," it merely needs to "be saturated with itself" which it is, by the identity of being a liquid.

[@ProAtBeingHuman]

Im just watching this all unfold -ISTP

[@guysstopwatchingmusicalspls]

joining you my friend -ESTP

[@coco-id8ws]

istp cameraman?

[@ProAtBeingHuman]

@@coco-id8ws Probably

[@catrice1296]

Yea i dont got enough energy foe that shi

[@theradiantdehd3997]

As an INFP, I'm shocked to hear them make that argument. Water is absolutely wet. It has the property of cohesion meaning it will stick to itself, and a liquid sticking to something is what makes it wet. MAYBE you have an argument if you say a single molecule of water isn't wet, but I have yet to see a single molecule of water used for ANYTHING but looking at it through a microscope. So water is indeed wet. You'd think the people who prefer thinking over feeling would have realized that... and now I feel like I'm coming off as passive aggressive, so I apologize. I'm not wrong though.

[@Shiro-Khaled]

No , you are an INFP for a reason mate 😂 - INTP

[@Shiro-Khaled]

So , logically , Wet means that a liquid is touching a solid , its an adjective that describes this exact thing , and it doesn't have to be water , it can be milk or anything , but putting two liquid together means nothing really , therefore water touching water means nothing also , therefore water isn't wet , you need a solid object mate , that's it , it's so simple , I don't know why people are stupid , for me that's the real question 😂😂😂😂 - INTP

[@theradiantdehd3997]

@@Shiro-Khaled Fair enough. Can fog or mist not be considered wet then?

[@Loknhbgggg]

As an INFP: I hereby declare that water, is NOT, wet.

[@pokemaciej9362]

Animation is so smooth!! God-damn (I agree with ENTJ, and that is not because I'm ENTJ.....................*WATER IS WET*)

[@UtkarshTripathi_]

No its not

[@Galexyboba]

It’s not I can c me arguing like this but on the other side - Entj

[@AkshayMohan-sy7yf]

Water is not wet. How can you say it is wet?? (I stand with INTP) - ENTJ

[@UtkarshTripathi_]

@@AkshayMohan-sy7yf give some reasoning for the claim, supreme leader

[@AkshayMohan-sy7yf]

@@UtkarshTripathi_ supreme leader, stop it haha. Water is a compound. It's physical state is liquid. Water is same no matter where you go(like water in China and water in America is same or water that you find in earth and mars is same. It made up of 2 Hydrogen molecules and 1 Oxygen molecule). So, there is no meaning about saying that water is wet. Because, it is being itself. Then how can we say water is wet?

[@loocydity6119]

As an INFJ, I agree with INTP and ENTP but ngl I'd watch from afar, laugh, and bring them all each a glass of water

[@No68392]

I Kinda Agree With INTP And ENTP (I am INFJ)

[@AnhThưNguyễn-n6i]

Me as an INFJ can confirm this

[@Pishtola]

Me too..

[@masterjj1]

Not me

[@dreamyoliyes3691]

because y'all have tert Ti XDDD

[@Lonelywhalien-xl5nr]

Im INFJ too

[@CalebCalhoun-m2u]

water is THE wet. it is literally the embodiment of wet.

[@beyondallreason-du4pq]

You might as well call water "wet"😂

[@CalebCalhoun-m2u]

@@beyondallreason-du4pq exactly!

[@fizzybizzysoda3288]

Technically if you can make water hydrophobic then its been giving itself its own properties already 🤓☝️

[@hgahsbsjsj]

you can't make water hydrophobic

[@cocomeloon7901]

It's not the water that's become hydrophobic, it's other things that can be made hydrophobic. Therefore, water isn't wet 🤓☝️ -ENTP

[@KuroDHero]

​​@@cocomeloon7901mixing water with silica dust makes dry water meaning water is inherently wet

[@KuroDHero]

@@hgahsbsjsj it's an emulsion, please dedicate 30 seconds to googling that word

[@ParasitismoDePuesta]

​@KuroDHero Just change the state 😮

[@andrielisilien]

Me an INFP, "So... Water isnt wet because in order to get wet it would have to be dry first."

[@beyondallreason-du4pq]

You explained it perfectly

[@_saturn-fz2jh]

Love the character designs, as an INTP I agree with INTP 😅

[@MadelineWendoline]

Day 3 : Conspiring against the water. Water wets because that's how we perceive it and anything else, but that doesn't mean that water wets because of its composition, water is liquid, but that doesn't mean that it wets itself. My head hurts lmfao -ISTP☠

[@MarshyMell]

I think I’m all of them at once lmfao Also I love ur INTP design it has sm steampunk alchemist vibes it’s very cool

[@cachalotreal]

entj with Te arguing what is real and widely & universally understood. entp and intp wih Ti and Ne arguing abstract concepts. pretty accurate

[@dr.emerald8844]

I am a ENTP my friend is a INTP, let's go we actually match

[@lizacolpamanifests]

My best friend is ENTP, I am an ENTJ And my husband is INTP, and I can tell you first hand this is exactly how we debate things 😂

[@IhateRusAme]

THE QUEEN FINALY POSTED!1!1!

[@POL_IRIS]

As the INTP friend I can confirm there's always someone who backs me up especially ENTPs 😂

[@marchuuk]

i adore character designs holy moly :>

[@EdgyMile]

As an INFP married to INTJ, I can completely understand INTJs point of view 🤣 But I would absolutely love to have an ENTP for a friend. They seem hilarious yet really smart.

[@Justme46588]

But INTP contradicts herself. At first she says: "If you touch this water, you don't get wet". But later: "water makes other things wet"

[@jerudo66]

Not exactly. The INTP was referring to a specific water they were both observing, saying one doesn't get wet when touching it. The ENTJ was oblivious to that and asked why since water as a liquid is supposed to be wet. The debate was launched on water as a whole, not the liquid the INTP was primarily talking about.

[@kringle7804]

that just means for some reason the water doenst stick on you. if you make your hand hydrophobic that doesnt mean water isnt water

[@jerudo66]

@@kringle7804 you perfectly described it

[@Zetact_]

The assertion that water isn't wet is inherently a contradiction.

[@Greys_my_favourite_color987]

@@kringle7804 no at the beginning of the video the intp says "when you touch this water ***you*** don't get wet" and the entj got confused and started referring to water in general

[@vaqueroconqueso]

As an ENTJ I think that reaction fits more with ESTJ, I mean, they can be too traditional sometimes before wondering if that could help them solve a current problem, but yeah the anger is still ENTJ.

[@aaaoii]

Water molecules are cohesive when then they're between water molecules, but when they come in "contact" with other molecules they can be adhesive although it depends. When you put a drop of water on a sheet of paper, the water's in the shape of a small sphere which means they're cohesive. But when you very slowly touch the surface with one finger, the water becomes adhesive and the molecules massively suck up to your skin. Point is, water is wet but isn't. .... I'm jumping. -INTP

[@JoeArty]

As an INTJ, that's totally me. all the time. watching menacingly as people lost their minds 😂😂

[@seraphicdreams]

The Queen of MBTI has finally posted 🥳✨️ What's your opinion , is water wet or not ?

[@seraphicdreams]

As an INTJ, I would say that both possibilities are technically valid , but "wet" means being affected by water, through direct contact. In this case, the water is in direct contact with itself so it is indeed humid 🥳

[@CounttlessYT]

I once came here thinking I was INTP, completely relating to INTP. But then it took some time and a lot of people to realise I am INTJ. I completely understand both perspectives, been in both their boat

[@bluelfsuma]

Water is wet. As in, it is wetness itself. There.

[@redwolf344]

Thank you

[@davidvanaa1191]

Arghhh finally someone with common sense thank you

[@Greys_my_favourite_color987]

if water can't be dry then it can't be wet

[@bluelfsuma]

@@Greys_my_favourite_color987 It is what wetness is. It causes wetness. And Red can't not be red just because it can't be blue.

[@danielmalinen6337]

I was waiting for the most awkward moment when the ENFP would emerged from the water and say "Now I'm wet" and would end the argument with our own wacky chaosity.

[@User09625]

yeah!! the queen is back 👑✨

[@user000-j5z]

as an ENFP, i'll engage them in a highly ontological discussion about the levels of wetness of different drinks and/or other objects before inviting them to my bar for physical demonstrations. with a possible pit stop by 7/11 on the way. for slushy.

[@CineShinya]

Perfect matching in characters and opinions. They all both kind of have a point though. I also just realised that in my language (Greek) this argument wouldn't stand as the word for wet is also the same word as liquid. And while they can argue water is not wet, they can't say it's not liquid. Not in this form it appears to be at least. Because, yea, someone can argue about ice and steam. I now wonder if Naruto was dubbed in Greek (since someone mentioned Natuto, so I assume the scene is from there) and if yes, how did they dub this argument??? Unless all this is from a parody and that scene never happened. (And this is what happens when you give Ne to an ISFJ, I need to stop). Anyway nice animation!

[@txtinyourarea]

as an entj i argued about this literally today in school?? and i had the same notion that water is wet (IDFGAF WHAT YOU SAY WATER IS WET I AM SICK AND TIRED OF SAYING THIS)

[@imanoreo6918]

I once brought up this argument in 3rd grade because i have read about it on some magazine and wanted to flex to some classmates. They laughed at me, and when someone does that i go completely mute, so i couldn't properly explain it to them & they just walked away. Never talked to them again, probably for the better lol. ~sincerely, an "i have no fucking idea what my type is, even after being into the mbti community for more than a year now".

[@dantesabetis5948]

"I wanted to flex on some classmates" sounds like ENTP. But if you say that being laughed at made you "shy" and then you disappeared from their lives, then you might be INFP or possibly ENFP/ENFJ. Wish you all the best.👐🏻🌈

[@Midnight_Reaper]

@@dantesabetis5948 cognitive functions

[@sai_lahari9999]

This made my day 😂😂 As an INFJ myself, i never knew NT types r so fun. Gosh that really made me laugh. I needed that. Thx guys❤️

[@謝恩慈-g9e]

Really like your MBTI art (´∇｀)

[@ForeverMe217]

I’m an INTP and the amount of time I have argued with my friends about this 😭

[@r0yce]

As an INTP....I've always been jealous of INTJs but don't tell them that.

[@edwinsolis5710]

Any liquid by definition is wet. It’s only not the case when you change the definition of the term to only mean a solid being covered by moisture. Every liquid is saturised with Moisture, which gives it a wet property.

[@han-df9mw]

Except wet isn’t in any definition of it. So it isn’t by definition, but by shit you made up.

[@bluemaster75]

And by change the definition, you mean use the actual definition?

[@fieryskyyy]

INFP here, and I agree with the INTP, I always thought water wasn't wet. And I have the urge to use that exact same argument whenever someone says "it's like saying water isn't wet" well it's NOT. And my mom (ISFP) would just look at me thinking "this is stupid, I'm not going to debate on this".

[@tranhai1997]

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Very MASTERPIECE!!!!!! But funny😂😂😂

[@user-xe9sg1wg7t]

As an INTJ, for my part, I just wouldn't have thought it practical to debate why my answer to the quandry was Yes.

[@idk_030]

as an intp, i agree

[@joseygamer9873]

My brother is the one who brought this whole conversation now seeing it on KZbin. He have this debate in school with his friends water is wet😂😂😂😂 I had to show this to my brother. He’s a whole reason why I have this conversation.

[@joseygamer9873]

This is my question put dirt on type of table. It’s dirty when you drop food on the floor is it dirty or not dirty because still dirty both ways

[@LolliLoiLoi_]

Just watching this makes me question everything-

[@anjitha6588]

lmao I dont know my friend's mbtis but we literally had a similar convo on a car ride about if rain falling to the ocean makes it wet and then we started arguing about what wet is.

[@Blasius-bp7yy]

Wettness it's not a propriety of the fluid alone but of the interaction between the fluid and surface. The same thing applies for heat: a body doesn't have "more heat" then another one, but it's a quantity af energy that is exchanged, and for this we can define heat only when a higher temperature body touches a lower temperature body.

[@handlebar4520]

Fire is hot, but water isn't wet. This is because the mechanism that allows fire, a partially ionized plasma composed of energetic gaseous molecules, to heat something up, by radiating thermal photons into its surrounding particles, can be done to other molecules in its volume, since it can distribute its property not only to other bodies at its boundary or via radiation, whose average kinetic energy of the molecules' in it are lower, but also to itself, fire is hot. However in water's case, the forces that allow water to be wet are only found at its surface, the boundary between the surface of a given volume of water, and something else, like a container, given that both objects are composed of sufficiently polar molecules. This allows special forces, known as adhesive forces, to be created only at this boundary, since water cannot distribute this property throughout its volume, and only at the boundary between surfaces, water cannot apply its own property to itself like fire can, so water isn't wet.

[@Blasius-bp7yy]

@@handlebar4520 i don't know if we can consider fire hot, because fire (combustion in presence of oxigen) is a reaction and not an element. Fire heats the air molecules up, and what we can percieve as hot is not the fire by itself, but the air aroud it (if we extingush it, the air around is still warm). But what I understood from what you wrote is that: if we have a body with a known temperature, we can divide that body in multiple smaller bodies that exanges heat continuosly between eachother. Thats true, but even if we do this, heat is still not a propriety of the bigger body. We can say that heat is transferred only when two or more bodies touch (i know that there are other ways to transfer heat to a body, but it's better to not overcomplicate this). So, in the end, temperature is the only propriety of the body, and heat (because it's basically energy) is defined only when a body touches another.

[@biank1816]

THE ANIMATION>>>perfect

[@CarlosCruz-bu1kd]

lol the intj understanding that both are right and wrong at the same time, and just keeping to themselves.

[@justme8841]

So true 😂😂😂

[@Chuck_not_Chuck]

Not only this. The term “wet” as we use it, applies to objects that have been saturated with/covered in a liquid. By this definition, only solid objects can be wet. Therefore, water is not, in fact, wet. I’m also INTP if you were wondering.

[@Touvels]

IM ON INTP SIDE - ESTJ

[@jingchua4686]

The battle between Ti and Te lmao 🤣

[@Bliss-i9e]

Amazing 😻