Way of a Warrant

How Google responds to U.S. search warrants, while working hard to protect our users' privacy and security. Learn more about how we handle requests: google.com/tran...

[@ScottyBeam]

You don't see Facebook trying to explain this type of stuff to its users.

[@InsertCoin007]

That's because Facebook hands user info out like it's no big deal.

[@snrdivan]

I loved this!

[@NikitaRestrepo]

I understand this a lot more now because of where I work. This was an excellent and cute way to break it down

[@dragondogedinogaming5219]

Scotty same

[@sisterfister698]

Well at least they have the decency to not pretend they do all the stuff Google says they do themselves

[@jonnat9964]

I misread this and thought the title was "Way of a Walmart"

[@alexzandriamorales7616]

Jon Nat same

[@Ethaaaaaaaaaan]

so did i

[@zeyden6801]

Jon Nat same

[@TheDankEngineer]

😹😂👌🔥💯

[@enzoisrandomnessjl2332]

Jon Nat same

[@jesalgandhi]

At 3:18 how is there the new Google logo, when it was released in September 2015, but this video came out in May 2014?

[@BrandonRowe_g]

+Jesal Gandhi They probably added the new logo and re-uploaded the video, super users the ability to do that

[@10kevinle]

Almost forgot that they're the OP of the internet pretty much.

[@ebruakbac6811]

Kevin Le Gfhqjhwhjwu1yqtqg w qay.swa ve tg 58ui⛼🗽🎠💒💒🏩🕍💒🌁🕍🕍🌄🌌fyyyuyh2h !bhbhb vvv Bir ¡》》》¤¤¤¤□●●□●●●▪¤□♤♤>>🌌🎠🗼🕍🏫🏪🕍 bu 🌁🀄 rfgftfr0rrrr45yü

[@ebruakbac6811]

Kevin Le 5 a5

[@rohaanpatel]

At 0:13 The logo is there too

[@BinkieMcFartnuggets]

You can't help but trust sentient wooden dolls.

[@msrenesia28]

BinkieMcFartnuggets as the+8axizi u

[@agnarstangen736]

BinkieMcFartnuggets you

[@camfrazer3825]

I see you everywhere, Binkie.

[@rwfbellman4916]

Fry

[@munnypoltric]

lol

[@Germanistan]

2:03 - "Yeah, that'll do" that is totally something the FBI would say in that case.

[@extrafuntime1660]

AlmightyJesus

[@Germanistan]

ExtraFuntime

[@totnguyen1514]

ExtraFuntime co dai 8 tuoi .

[@buddylasater7565]

how can I transfer my apps to my SD card

[@loribeard4509]

Buddy Lasater dzjhjkh

[@StephenHolder]

Probably the most entertaining (and informative) legal process video you've ever seen.

[@nicholsfamily0416]

Stephen Holder 5th

[@СтасЛебідь-ц1э]

Ььлдооос🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉ч😂😂😂😂дсдюж. Жвдбмвд жвдбммбддбвдбж🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉Вітаємо в буфері обміну Gboard. Скопійований текст зберігатиметься тут.Вітаємо в буфері обміну Gboard. Скопійований текст зберігатиметься туееее🎉а🎉 кп е🎉🎉(⁠っ⁠˘̩⁠╭⁠╮⁠˘̩⁠)⁠っт.ттььб. 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 природного 🎉🎉🎉🎉каеееа🎉. 🎉🎉🎉епе🎉 на🎉кп🎉е🎉🎉😮

[@OPPO-yt1js]

​@@nicholsfamily0416123

[@mapledev]

Haha I love how "The Other Guys" ever so sliiiiightly looks like a Facebook jab.

[@MikeDownes]

Blog post too: googleblog.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/transparency-report-requests-for-user.html

[@TheRealRoadDog]

Seems legit. I trust you now, Google.

[@nikitaspratt5736]

U tube video bad videos wars Kells.

[@nikitaspratt5736]

Genocide videos

[@michaelns6786]

@@nikitaspratt5736 Shut up.

[@agel.kruithof917]

de @@nikitaspratt5736s

[@sonicthehedgehogDX]

When the impostor is sus! 😳

[@AmithRaravi]

*Google* has put up a video detailing how it works on User Data requests from Government agencies. Its fun and informative, not necessarily in that order. This is the meaning of being "transparent".

[@TheSpecterRanger]

0:36 Did he just sign "Jews" ????? HAHAHA

[@theawesonenintendofan3623]

1:48 my google home actually turned on in this part

[@comrade_pasta]

Shout out to google for actually telling people how it is that they complete a process instead of keeping it to themselves. At least they tell you if your data is being used against you.

[@Arm4g3dd0nX]

This all SOUNDS great... but if you notice, there was quite a frequent use of the word, "if". Like, if it looks like the data is being requested by the other guys, or if the warrant looks too vague, etc. That means Google may refuse or refine a warrant 60% of the time based on how it looks, or not give a damn and refuse or refine it 0.0000001% of the time. This all would still, technically, be true.

[@looseSpark]

The "if" could just mean that most of the time warrants are issued correctly and appropriately. I would hope that is 99% of the time. I think you are reading too much into the "if".

[@اثيرالهاشمي-ج5ه]

Arm4g3dd0nX ٢٥ض٢٣٥ق٢ث٤٢٤

[@BoopSnoot]

LMAO at the part where the judge carefully reviews the request. Also, if the NSA or FBI requests the info, as far as I know they pay google and have open access, no search warrant needed. If you want your private info private, don't use google services.

[@Hy-BridAbroad]

If you want your private info private, don't use the internet... or technology at all just to be safe.

[@yinge101]

Kickstarter: 'Way of a Warrant' Board Game

[@cjthomp2005]

Dude I want this

[@Honeystar_bear]

I thought I saw Dora getting arrested by some random agent or spy on the thumbnail

[@No_Limits_411]

I dont have a problem with google or police seeing my data.

[@graciedianecoronadoleal6623]

Veiko Heiberg

[@LoganT547]

Anyone else binge-watching company videos at 3AM?

[@Laotzu.Goldbug]

Imagine believing that they do anything to "narrow the scope" and don't just give the authorities literally everything they asked for. Lmao

[@chrisparcel3652]

2:36 This man goes all the way around the world to go to a place that was walking distance

[@nafisadmankhan]

I came here to know if you have stolen my data

[@WilliamDuyck]

Its nice to see that you are being a little more transparent about your processes in a human friendly way, and that you've provided a link out for more detailed information. Can't say this for every major corp out there. Thanks ;)

[@ghajik.]

how have the times changed

[@lubomirjanecek1027]

0:47 ​@@ghajik.

[@shplamana]

This is all fine and dandy, unless it comes from the FISA, then the user will never know and Google can't deny it or narrow it down.

[@MohammedTelbani]

it seems just like not true story

[@aengeln]

Very nice! I am a bit curious how this applies to non us citizens?

[@sisterfister698]

Too bad 6 years working for Academi/Constellis Holdings taught me that this is BS. How it worked for us: Step 1 - Google we need all sensitive information on this individual. Step 2 - Google wont refuse because they have contracts with Academi/Constellis Holdings that they don't want to lose Step 3 - They give it to us Step 4 - ???? (I cant talk about that)

[@0xC]

Thanks for this information, Sister Fister 69.

[@sisterfister698]

@@0xC When we get a security contract to protect individuals or to put together a target package for pickup, we have to know everything we can about the people around them in their life. This couod be well over 100 people. No way do we go through that entire process. It would take years. Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, even credit sites like Equinox are tied up in contracts with Constellis Holdings. They hand that information over without question.

[@CalebHawn]

This is interesting and educational. Nice to know Google respects the private information we have, and will only give it out in the most careful way.

[@benderbg]

And we can thank for all of this to Edward Snowden, not Google.

[@PeterSitterly]

This is the process they had in place before people even knew Snowden's name.

[@mdelino1]

Peter Sitterly abb Nk

[@BARANESCU100]

Cea mai tare din parcare

[@SnoopyDoofie]

3:01 Hey, that's ME!!!!!! I'm famous!!!!

[@subzeroalphaq]

I don't get people who are STILL complaining about how Google "cooperates with the law" what do you want them to do, run an illegal company just so you don't have to worry about a potential search warrant? (You shouldn't worry if you haven't done anything)

[@pilotex2011]

Because it's "the law" doesn't mean that you have to cooperate (cf: world history : nazism, slavery were both allowed by the law). "You shouldn't worry if you haven't done anything" : I agree with you but it seems that the NSA doesn't make that distinction. Same for the US customs. Sorry but U.S is using the same tools as Dictatorship... Sad.

[@carssucksince1800s]

pilotex2011 still does not mean that Google should be breaking the law. They are doing their best to stop this from happening. May be you should sign their petition to help.

[@subzeroalphaq]

Look all i'm trying to say is, stop complaining about how Google follows the law. They protect their users as best as possible but they can't break the law for us.

[@DaraTravers]

Nick Orie Who asked them to break what law exactly?

[@pilotex2011]

Val Kukatov I understand your point, but on the other side, they break citizens rights. But whether your point of view or mine, people who are threat to the US wins by forcing the US to act this way don't you think ? US should show those people that they are not afraid.

[@boiledwine]

How can anyone like this? If someone wants your email they should come to you, not your provider. That's some messed up back-door dealings. Accepting this is setting a precedent to allow avoiding you altogether. Kiss your rights goodbye, internet users. Your speech will be paid for instead of free yet, you won't see a dime.

[@blackturtleshow]

Okay, that's how you serve a warrant in the USA, but what about if law enforcement in another country wants data generated from a user account based in the USA?

[@lward96]

Then they will probably have to go through the US government. So basically the same process, but will probably only happen if we have a extradition law with that country requesting it.

[@teresamartinez5877]

blackturtleshow hair

[@teresamartinez5877]

blackturtleshow u:

[@teresamartinez5877]

blackturtleshow 💇

[@teresamartinez5877]

x cu : type

[@MCCESQ]

Since Google's obligation is ultimately to the corporation and the stockholder and not necessarily the user, but also since Google has the motto of not being evil, has it ever considered appointing a party to act as a sort of guardian ad litem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_guardian) to protect the privacy interests of the user? Just thinking aloud here... nice video.

[@Soniadovetonian]

I just wish all the terms and conditions were explained in this format! Cool video! Nice job!

[@eddiejones156]

this would be a great education video for schools

[@lshb8964]

je me

[@LOLO3000]

demande

[@zakirahmed8741]

Shorouk

[@karinagonzalez2229]

Eddie Jones ejjhgh

[@joywilson9233]

Eddie Jo..nl

[@brandon9689]

I'm sure there are powerful enough authority and systems out there that could skip this process without anyone ever knowing if they want to. But thanks for the cute animations to create that sense of security, even if it's fake.

[@shwnshts9469]

BUT are there any loopholes via an app & permissions that could be exploited?

[@KurdtStoo]

Woah! This bullshit you're feeding us sure looks delicious! Thank you Google!

[@fmccloud]

They are saying more than you are.

[@CravenTHC85]

Alexander Rolli Its not as if KurdtStoo needs to say anything since many ISPs and search engine sites were outed for their involvement with the NSA recently. This is a poor attempt to save face when the evidence clearly supports the alternative hypothesis.

[@fmccloud]

CravenTHC The NSA doesn't need Google's willingness/compliance to get data. They tap the data before it gets to Google and store what they can't decrypt. People need to wake up and realize that Google is on our side.

[@CravenTHC85]

When they are. You're right about the NSA intercepting certain types of data, but they also performed warrant-less searches, some of which were not challenged. AT&T, Yahoo, and Google were a few of the names mentioned for having complied with warrant-less searches. Specifics were not mentioned, but you really shouldn't sit there and act like these companies are completely innocent.

[@fmccloud]

No they aren't all innocent,, but it's hard to resist the weight of the government and "patriotic duty" They have to comply and are gagged.

[@DrDuckey]

Hmm... Google, how come this video was originally uploaded in 2014, but your logo changed in the video since the last time I saw. Both the "G" and the "Google" logo were not used in 2014. I also noticed some other things that were changed. You changing the video on w/o letting us know? Shouldn't that be re-uploaded w/ a new date?

[@perticewhite7580]

Mark Jorgensen t Highbury

[@CodPK2]

Why are people afraid that the government is going to search their account unless you did something bad?

[@enp82003]

nudes of themselves they have sent to their lovers... duh!

[@MarioDragon]

4th amendment

[@FoxArchipelago]

We're not afraid, we just don't like people talking behind our backs.

[@shway1]

because the NSA gathers everyone's data illegally, without getting a proper warrant or asking google

[@Broadsmile1987]

Build a house with glass walls, including these of your toilet, because you have nothing to hide. :)

[@abandonedchannel2002]

I would be scared to death if I got an email from the government asking about my child...

[@chaundragrant9534]

6hu UO 0ui0089a roll zzz's ulis UO ul it huh. B m M by 7 h0

[@DuangdaraLuckySripinyo]

Thanks .!!!

[@walawlc]

I don't understand anything they're saying, but I like watching the little people walk around😊

[@srabbelier]

This is a really great explanation of how Google deals with search warrant. A lot of effort goes into protecting the users privacy!

[@SpiritofSix]

I applaud Google if these types of precautions are always taken. Kudos! I talk about philosophical and societal issues and topics that help us grow as human beings. All I want is for us to embrace our humanity and our reality for all of its truths--the good and the bad. This life is a gift.. death is a promise: so let us constantly overcome ourselves to be something more. If you find me genuine, bring me your knowledge and life experiences so that we may both grow. That is all, no more no less. Good day to everyone:)

[@robertharris8791]

ofSix jh hi call

[@arnoldavila7714]

ofSix y

[@rifkaaskenazi6587]

Stanbulu gelin

[@dnlswan]

I love how this was presented

[@malik123yaad]

Pi

[@malik123yaad]

... Jj.. 8kk?

[@malik123yaad]

.. Jbnn M. 8in jjb. R tb!.. Yt. The. I9c.. N b no9. In89

[@damianpodbielski6181]

@@malik123yaadna na

[@eliomoreno9770]

@@malik123yaad hggugguggggugugfhhuughhugggugugghgguguguggugggugfggggcgfgfg

[@AVeryCleverAndUniqueUsername]

I love Google for fun yet informative adverts, searches and great platforms for content like KZbin. This is one of the reasons that they are so popular, while every thing is white and seemingly dull, they are very fun and cool =D

[@DudeOfX]

an attempt for a false sense of security

[@kosog6584]

Get lost, tinfoil virgin.

[@Nicsmovies]

How about a remote killswitch for user data when a user's phone has been stolen by the authorities? My provincial police stole my phone for 9 months after a CAR ACCIDENT, downloaded all of my personal data off the phone, and gave it back. SO google safeguarding anyones data in a legal event is a bit of a joke, just saying.

[@BobGourleyCTO]

Nice job clearly articulating what you do. Your lawful help in issues like child safety, protection of victims, capturing of violent criminals, prevention of crime and in making it harder for hostile powers and terrorists to take advantage of us all are very important and good.

[@lemmylambshanks3426]

I appreciate (and want to believe in) Google's efforts towards transparency, but this video has little to do with transparency and a whole lot to do with reassurance and public image. Although the video reassures us that Google attempts to minimize overreach and violations of privacy, there is nothing to corroborate these claims. The only information I've found that they've released shows that Google produces "some data" in response to 83% of U.S. warrants. What kind of data, how limited, how often they "narrow" the warrant, and all the other things talked about in this video we just have to take their word on. That is hardly transparency.

[@tunafishjoe]

This is how you respond to a search warrant. How do you respond to Patriot Act requests?

[@ouackstrax]

; ) Shh.. they were counting on the bulk of the public assuming it's the same thing that's been in the news for months so the bulk can go back to assuming anything else is just a tinfoil-laced conspiracy theory. Shocked to see how many people are satisfied with this and went right back to that kind of thinking as easily as this spoonfeeding attempt to obscure the actual problem. I thought we already knew they generally bowed down to search warrants.

[@tunafishjoe]

I agree. Packaging the whole thing in this "cute and playful" manner is insulting as well, but people buy it!

[@j.redhead]

+Gordon Tendick this whole thread is so painfully true xP

[@shopnohara2082]

Gordon Tendick =\ zz cf tt fee222 w questions_211_1 si Suu c ah zip u 0 for .

[@anishaharmon169]

Heywood Yabloome 78th irkeirjkk3k4kj4

[@--Nath--]

So in the case that people are actually concerned about: the widespread "terrorism" catch-all - what's the process Google? Your video conveniently left this out - deliberately I'd say. So is this the process that the NSA goes through to get data? Is there anything too broad for those sort of requests? No one really cares about the above case - because we'd all expect that is the case for a specific person's involvement in a criminal matter - it's the massive deep trawling that the security agencies are doing that's the concern - do a cutesy video telling us what they get access to - I think they jump straight to the machine bit where they're retrieving data - right?

[@mreverything1143]

Well so dosen't google "notify" the users?

[@ThePotato_]

+Mreverything11 but it says that in the video...

[@michaelbruington5959]

What happens when the law enforcement agency that wants all the information on a user doesn't respond with a conveniently accommodating "that'll do" when asked to settle for part of it?

[@AndrewMackoul]

I like how you did the video, very informative.

[@NilesTheRobot]

This has to be a real board game :)

[@itsmoss]

is that barn a jab at facebook? ha!

[@anthonygreulich8244]

@@tonynevill5089 gay.

[@anthonygreulich8244]

@@tonynevill5089 straight

[@corgidog7125]

If I'm ever hunted by the FBI I'll at least be happy knowing their is a well animated video explaining how they're going to undercover my search history.

[@SyntaxAero]

I love how Google has a sense of humor, but can still be serious. I love Google.

[@joneshbach683]

Hey

[@ke4277]

Aero 8

[@livegamexx1567]

Love me

[@misterosc]

Yeah yeah that's with the government but why do all the adds in your page know if I'm going to buy a new phone or if I'm travelling to Paris and recommends me a hotel? Is that Google selling my search history?

[@leoncampa]

Future 16 year old Police officer applicant trolls the internet... because he is a stupid 16 year old teenager. 10 years later, same person: "oh my, I was stupid when I was young... whatever, let's just hope nobody ever finds out about it. I am now responsible and want to become a police officer... I should delete those photos of me being drunk from all my personal blogs. Police department issues a background check request to google: "could you please show us all records of this person dating back from 10 years ago?" Google: "Sure, can we inform the applicant?" Police: "No". Google: "ok... here you go" Police: "hmm... this guy used to be stupid back in the days... he couldn't POSSIBLY have changed." *applicant receives job request denial*: "Sorry, but you were not selected" Applicant: "why?" Police: "Your background check revealed some strange things about you... dating from 10 years ago" ------------------------------------------------------ I personally experienced this myself... beware of what you post online kids.

[@PycasneEesost]

Wow. Amazing. I don't know much about the law (for good reason.. >.

[@Deveron4]

Dang. That's a real shame. :(

[@TheRinzl2r]

Well, that's not really Google's fault. It's your own fault for being stupid, and the employer's fault for not seeing past your errors. Google is just a mediator.

[@stherxsabryna7396]

TheRinzl2r

[@noragarcia6762]

HolmgrenHahn ghghhgf ghbgyt

[@WilliamWaiteProductions]

Compare this to Facebooks policy, where they just hand all of your personal information over no problem.

[@omarbaz6822]

sure.. that's what they do

[@touchstone1682]

This was released too close to April 1st. I don't trust this too much 😑

[@lactobacillusprime]

Interested how this will work internationally... as Google has an international userbase...

[@melindawilliams2056]

lactobacillusprime x"iu >,&&

[@juliovillarreal5590]

lactobacillusprime

[@joumaoptujs]

Im reading all these comments and not one said "Thank you Google for doing everything you can for user. You are not such an evil corporation". Let's be honest they aren't. This is why I said in another post, I will work for Google one day!

[@JeremyStreich]

How about the question, "How does google deal with a National Security Letter"? How about the question, "What was accessed by the NSA's tap into the unencrypted internal private network between Google services"? Lastly, how many users were tracked on the internet using Googles' prefs cookie, because Google didn't serve it as a secure cookie?

[@jaanveejagwani6744]

Difjfivrntb%Mr Rmkrhrjk Bfkrjrrjkrl

[@Hookooo]

So thats why NSA built in backdoors so they would have no need of search warrant.

[@nukeclears]

Thanks for clearing this up.

[@aadilarshad1983]

Nukeclears and

[@aadilarshad1983]

So

[@erinjames4492]

What is NSA I believed you Google a hundred percent I love story picture books they're my favorite kind!!!

[@multimateco]

best april fools google prank.

[@plimbroposts7137]

Is there any hope of stopping the NSA?

[@THE-SE7EN-SINS]

Yes, I've messaged you twice already but they keep deleting it. So I'll tell you again.. hold somebody is knocking on the door brb

[@plimbroposts7137]

***** I went back actually checked my messages at first. That's funny part LOL

[@saadjamal1000]

plot twist: the cow is a secret agent

[@miticomito245]

hahahah XD

[@KarlRamstedt]

Good work Google. The last thing you'd wanna do is mistreat your customers.

[@Bloxed]

This...is...AMAZING!!!

[@LordStickMax]

cool story bro. now what about meta data?

[@khaliddahirissa4114]

You are asking too many questions username LordStickMax. We will be in contact soon username LordStickMax.

[@glennsimmons8800]

Lackson Banda

[@hyrumholyrood4536]

Now I want one of those cow figurines!

[@jasonzhan_g]

its nice to see googles humour

[@fs0c1ety]

So what I learned from this video? Uploaded video can be manipulated! #2015NewGoogleLogo

[@appumathew]

So nice of you Google. I believed all of it. Thank you. Who is Snowden and What is PRISM? Who cares when google's working hard to protect my privacy. :)

[@nadineneill2179]

Appu Mathew

[@monakw]

That's all good if you're a lego...if you're human they just come and getcha.

[@JoshFlorii]

Did anyone else catch the massive qualifier at the beginning---- "excessive" requests----? So most of the time, they just give the information out freely?

[@ArifKhan-fr3ht]

Josh Fwlori

[@JamesKevinSorrell-jq8do]

If you listen to a bird as it goes over Wal-Mart the way of it is cheep-cheep!

[@GagaPOD]

What's the big deal? Unless you consider yourself to be a suspect of something big, then, why worry over a simple search?

[@WoodRabbitTaoist]

Yeah, why worry about a simple search. It's no big deal! Just go back to living your normal life with out worry for the small details. Everything will be all right.

[@tunafishjoe]

Great question! One concern for me is constant government surveillance. Consider all of the laws you or friends have broken... smoking pot, drinking underage, speeding, threatening to harm someone (rhetorically or in a fit of rage), etc. In most cases, these crimes go unpunished, and nobody is harmed. There was little reason for the government to get involved. But, the easier you make it for the government to monitor you, the easier you make it for them to punish you.

[@tunafishjoe]

Here's a much better article on the subject... www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/whats-wrong-public-video-surveillance

[@GagaPOD]

The article has useful information, but I'm not talking about public surveillance video, I'm talking about our private info gathered around the web, being given to outside sources (the police department for example.) You're right about considering all the laws my friends have broken or I myself...but I can stand proud and say I have done no such thing as break the law. As for my friends, I can't say for I do not know. The thing is, all the people complaining about search warrants, makes me believe that they have or will break the law. If one is innocent, why worry about a search?

[@GagaPOD]

As I also may add, such a search is not used for everything. Perhaps there are people who are breaking the law right now, but they are minor acts...which will probably not show up on anyone's radar. I would like to believe that our information across the web from sites like Facebook or Google...would be given in cases of much seriousness.

[@lar00ster]

Thanks for the video. I thought it was very good and like the character props.

[@uncannycam]

Gathering double checking woah what's the cow doing here? Deliver the data...hand it over to the custodian nice mustache. LOL NICE ONE GOOGLE

[@user-uc9fm8bn9o]

Love you google!

[@munnypoltric]

thanks for making this stuff into a kids show. We know you are benevolent, innocent and good spirited now

[@GregOfficially]

It’s a way to dumb it down and make it interesting google style, you understood didn’t you?

[@Paulbarbato]

Is the user notified about ANY of the decisions that the conduits are making in the process while it's going on?

[@robertlemiesz7143]

Did you even watch the video

[@Paulbarbato]

Robert lemiesz Yes and at no point during the process does it ever say the producer or screener tell you about the logistical decisions they make while they are deciding on what content of yours to share based on the case, all it says is that the user is "notified" that federal authorities want information, but they are not told specifically "which content" the producers decide to give out.

[@benjaminkcagain]

Not even that: the user is notified that federal authorities want information, "if legal and appropriate". It is common for the courts to forbid anyone involved from notifying the target. With no numbers given, it's reasonable to suspect that the vast majority of targeted users are never informed that their private data was handed over, nor even requested.

[@robertlemiesz7143]

Well if the courts forbid them... there really isnt anything google can do.

[@isunlloaoll]

Still best not to put private stuffs online guys. . . its never safe.

[@chivedavis1706]

welcome to the machine...

[@MrDontAsk3]

"Everything is done accurately," he says while the puppet just hits random buttons on a machine.

[@moltzer]

+MrDontAsk3 True.

[@joseparada5254]

I thought in the thumbnail that that girl with short brown hair was dora-

[@RyanMills84]

Good to know that Google doesn't just "bow down" to the Government.

[@saattlebrutaz]

The police are after murderers, tax evaders, extortioners, assaulters, rapers. Google is just trying to make $$$. It's good that the police have a way to solve crime. When you are victimised by someone, you'll be happy to know there is a party (i.e. the Police) there to help you, because Google won't care.

[@JosephHoyne]

So that's how you process us request what about request from other countries about us citizens

[@eyguera1972]

Very nice!!!

[@jeanemaxwell5153]

Paw patrol r

[@aznmeowmeow]

Protip: The government doesn't need a warrant to look through your email because of some stupid loophole in the law.

[@Vector3Gaming]

1) care to prove that you actually go through these steps? 2) doesnt the NSA's single search warrant for everyone's data mean that despite all this, we still have no privacy online?

[@sirhype]

***** I wouldn't blame that on Google... They do what they can

[@HankyUSA]

The NSA didn't tell Google what they were doing. They certainly didn't have a warrant. Google couldn't have gone through these steps in that case. Big government was the criminal that day, not big business.

[@Vector3Gaming]

no, google is still to blame, if NSA got past this procedure then whats the point of this video? it becomes void

[@Vector3Gaming]

so a video like this is the perfect chance to tell us that this happened without their permission, ILLEGALLY. not pretend everything is fine, do you not see that this video is trying to pretend everything is alright and that our info is safe?

[@Vector3Gaming]

the NSA is not all powerfull.

[@boogeymanws]

Nobody trolls like they used to. NSA ruins all the fun.