We Are Being Pulled by the Great Attractor!

🌌 Discover the enigma of the Great Attractor in this captivating documentary by 'Space Matters'. As a colossal gravitational force, the Great Attractor is drawing our Milky Way and numerous other galaxies towards it, presenting a cosmic mystery that baffles astronomers and scientists alike.

[@winningjubbly9712]

If you look up the Great Attractor it says it suggests the gravatational pull of at least TEN THOUSAND galaxies. But the real shocker is the Great Attractor itself is being PULLED rapidly towards a part of the sky, and whatever it is that's pulling it is outside our observable universe

[@Chris.Davies]

"...and whatever it is that's pulling it is outside our observable universe." That seems extremely unlikely. care to explain?

[@winningjubbly9712]

@@Chris.Davies When I say "outside our observable universe" I mean whatever is further away from than we can see, further away than the edge of the observable universe. Put "The Great Attractor" into Wikipedia and you'll see what I mean. It clearly mentions a source of gravity so vast it's further away from us than we can see.

[@markpagtama7954]

Shapley attractor.

[@lastyhopper2792]

​@@user-ny7ny6jc8jI mean... gravity 'force' travels at the speed of light, right? If the light of celestial objects out there can't reach us because of the expansion of space, wouldn't that means their gravity can't affect us? I hope there's a mistake in that line of thinking of mine.

[@rebeccasmith8848]

@@Chris.Davieslook up how the speed of lights limits our observable universe. There are much smarter people that can explain this concept then me. But short story. Like super simplified: the earth can only see a small portion of the universe due to light from outside of that bubble not having time to reach our planet. Due to cosmic inflation most light that is outside of our little bubble will stay out of view.

[@ZubairIbnMushtaq]

The space is filled with infinite possibilities, we can only Hypothesize!

[@charlesbaldo]

@@RickVolvo890 Covid kind of proved that.

[@empyrean196]

@@charlesbaldo- Nah. Politics got in the way of expert opinion.

[@waldeckalex]

I like this guy, he knows as much about the Great Attractor as regular tractors.

[@mrhassell]

[@sarujan_view]

😂

[@tcioaca]

This is how Sheldon from the TBBT show should have talked. Awesome accent, awesome presentation, excellent job.

[@TheOttomann64]

Great presentation. Thank you 👍

[@abcde_fz]

This video just happens to have a great number of truly impressive graphics. I had to search my memory to come up with a word, an adjective, to convey that idea. It was _all_ _the_ _way_ _back_ _in_ _Junior_ _High_ _Land_ that I found it. "Tripendicular" This video has some _tripendicular_ graphics, man!!! It's just chock full of fascinating information!

[@newdefsys]

The Great Attractor is not _invisible_ to telescopes, it is _obscured_ from telescopes.

[@abcde_fz]

Nice to see someone else using _italics_ also. You know putting *asterisks* around text makes it bold? Putting -dashes- around text does strikeouts. :-) 🙂

[@jarrydlongmire9416]

Did you know that yhe definition of invisible is unable to be seen. So the usage of the word is correct

[@newdefsys]

@@jarrydlongmire9416 Then your home is invisible, because you are unable to see the outside walls from the inside.

[@fluffypancake6362]

*Wow*

[@JohnnotJaneDoe]

Not to x-ray telescopes

[@Alirian2]

The great attractor isn't "invisible" to our telescopes. We can't see it because we'd have to be able to look through our galaxy and it's got too much in the way. Hence why we can only see "up and down" from our galaxy

[@jarrydlongmire9416]

So from our perspective it cant be seen? as in not seeable, or not visible even? Man if only there was a word for that. Oh, wait!! I thought of a word for that, its INVISIBLE. Thats the word, by pure definition invisible is the correct word.

[@mycallingb621]

@@jarrydlongmire9416are you ok?

[@thatssoironic]

Yeah I don’t think that’s accurate at all

[@Alirian2]

@@thatssoironic It is. Look it up

[@999titu]

​@@jarrydlongmire9416😅😅killing me

[@mrhassell]

The great attractor, pulling us all towards an unknown place in space and time, I suspect has more to do with the concept of expansion. JWST just changed the expansion velocity and is smashing all kinds of long held theories. I hope, it does shine some light on Laniakea, the gravitational focal point which is home to the Great Attractor.

[@PlanetXMysteries-pj9nm]

Your videos have ignited a passion for science and the mysteries of the universe within me. Thank you for being such an incredible source of inspiration.

[@TimeWizard727]

Sometimes when i meditated when i was younger, i could feel this pull before i knew what it was. 🤯

[@StevieSmith77]

This narrator knows what a magnetar is, and also where in the creek the good bass are

[@theuniversegalaxynba]

Very well made video

[@haroldnowak2042]

Is the Great Attractor an illusion? Its location is 'behind' the Milky Way which is thought to be obscuring over view of this feature but maybe it will be always be seen to be obscured even when we go to the other side of the Milky Way in 100 million years time. Our understanding of movement in space is based on changes in electromagnetic radiation and possibly that is the problem. I don't know but its location seems a bit too convenient to me.

[@JohnnotJaneDoe]

I've always wondered about this too! I'm actually surprised that I haven't seen a single video or comment about this until now. Is it possible that all the electromagnetic radiation from that region is being gravitationally lensed by Sagittarius A*?

[@larscarter7406]

Its like a gravity tornado in space. A whirpool of galaxies being pulled in. If gravity was a fluid, it would look like water in the vortex of a tub drain. Considering how big space really is though, it could be just a small dust devil.

[@leryck]

Wow! Thank you so much!

[@isabellec9631]

Great science and video, thx.

[@archaichobo6969]

Is this the transcendental object at the end of time that Terrence McKenna used to talk about?

[@mrc1500]

If the centre of the Great Attractor is in the centre of the Norma Cluster then how can the Norma Cluster be moving "toward" the Great Attractor?

[@derfalschejunge]

Yeah, I tripped at that part, too.

[@mrc1500]

@@derfalschejunge I think I stopped watching shortly after that. I didn't deem the remainder of the video credible.

[@mstaway]

To add to the puzzle, some quotes from / based on Wiki and other online sources: The Norma Cluster is a rich cluster of galaxies located near the center of the Great Attractor. Recent astronomical studies by a team of South African astrophysicists revealed a supercluster of galaxies, termed the Vela Supercluster, in the Great Attractor's theorized location. The Great Attractor region is a large flat bottom gravitational valley with a sphere of attraction that extends across the Laniakea Supercluster. The South Pole Wall lies immediately beyond the Laniakea Supercluster, wrapping the region like an arm. Within the boundaries of the Laniakea Supercluster, galaxy motions are directed inward... Follow-up studies suggest that the Laniakea Supercluster is not gravitationally bound. It will disperse rather than continue to maintain itself as an overdensity relative to surrounding areas. The Great Attractor itself is moving towards the Shapley Supercluster. The Shapley Supercluster or Shapley Concentration is the largest concentration of galaxies in our nearby universe that forms a gravitationally interacting unit... It accounts for between a quarter and half of the Local Group’s (the home of e.g. the Milky Way and the Andromeda 'nebula') peculiar velocity. The remaining motion can’t be accounted for by structures astronomers have already found. So... Overall the Great Attractor isn't that great. The big player is Shapley. Irritating is the relation of the Laniakea vs the Vela Superclusters to the Great Attractor.

[@ioanbota9397]

Realy I like this video so so much its so interestyng

[@NullStaticVoid]

why do you jack the volume up so high?

[@PaulToth-lc2cv]

Awesome video. Thanks.

[@DisEnchantedPersons]

Where is it written that we are supposed to understand creation?

[@haraldperryrhoden1986]

I thought « The Great Atractor» was me!

[@oogabooga1696]

U are a tractor

[@andreungoogable]

if We Are Being Pulled by the Great Attractor! how we are in a expanding universe?

[@AmatureAstronomer]

Interesting.

[@arekkrolak6320]

is there a version of the video without that aweful music in the background that makes the speaker voice impossible to hear?

[@Jazzzyjay]

just curious, who is the author of this work. where do i get this information. is this sponsored by NASA? or similar. or is this simply AI generated. Thanks.

[@kurtpiket6513]

I think that there is ONE infinite universe with an endless volume and based on infinte mass, with the smallest mass of linear presense. Anything else ist in motion INSIDE this infiniteness. Where two directions of motions are possible: one of evolution by attraction in time/speed creating galaxies etc. one of involution by attraction by re-ducing time/speed creatinng fullfilment of infinteness.

[@tjcaruthers5593]

So is the Great Attractor the other gravitational anomaly that has been observed, dark flow?

[@gishjalmr5628]

Dark flow theory says that the cause of the observed peculiar velocity of galaxies is due to a mass beyond the observable universe. The great attractor is the theorized center of the Laniakea Supercluster of galaxies.

[@mindblowtimes]

😂 Better move away than Collide! Perfect Universe!

[@maxstrelets263]

Alan Dressler looks like an alien :D p.s. CGI is amaizing

[@495whiterobe]

Creation continues... The mass of the universe is increasing and the gravity of it is pulling us along 4:54

[@anunknownknown]

Read, "Voyage to the Great Attractor", by Alan Dressler, a mind blowing treatise!

[@williamfender661]

Maybe that's where the Big Bang or the start of our universe began. Kinda like a neutron star being what is left over after a supernova or 2 neutron stars merging in a kilanova. Or something more massive than super massive black holes in the center of galaxies. For something to have that much mass, something extraordinary had to have happened.

[@timmo971]

Ai enters the chat…

[@n014495]

It’s multi verse, expanding objects will be attracted to another near gravity attractor. And implode inside and then explode as another bang. Not just one universe but many many attractors

[@franklee3800]

Nice recovery at the end though I don't believe it. That hoover is gonna suck us up.

[@GOLDLINEBLOG]

I am a great lover of astrology and I have been following its progress. It is truly amazing how we can travel so fast the speed of light and catch-up with all that had happened millions and billions of years before us. Know that I am on this journey of discovery with you. Super Well Done

[@strayhandycat2753]

Wait until you discover astronomy in your journey! It’s also very fascinating.

[@user-fc2yh9nc1c]

Center of Universe or near by area of center were weight of Universe is balanced .

[@innertubez]

“The Zone of Avoidance” sounds so much better than “The Avoidance Zone”

[@Krackonis]

It's like the entirety of science forgot how EM works.

[@Jay-oy4jz]

I dont understand how have we not crashed into anything yet if we're traveling like we've been told we are

[@gordonbrown5901]

Spoller alert. It's my understanding that due to the expansion of the universe, we will never get there.

[@TheHoowee]

First we need to figure out how to go faster than light!!!

[@markhathaway9456]

@@TheHoowee If we're headed toward the Great Attractor at a few hundred km / second, then we have to figure out how to go the other direction just a bit faster. If this galaxy has an escape velocity, as the Earth has an escape velocity, we should be able to understand and calculate the task pretty precisely. Jules Verne figured out the escape velocity of Earth far before we got rockets to the moon.

[@gordonbrown5901]

@@TheHoowee would Thursday of next week be ok? 😂

[@sonsofthewestredwhiteblue5317]

Great attractor : “How you doin’? 😎”

[@TheGrandGosh]

So were 14 billion years into this show does that mean at one point the great attractor was once more dence than it is now?

[@jean-francoisdaignault9612]

Thank you for helping me find my drag name : Greta Tractor

[@12hrts]

I believe that if the universe started from a point then that same point is probably still there. That point would have to be the “middle” of the universe. Maybe after it expanded, is started to implode again, like a black hole.

[@tcioaca]

Not quite. Search for the _balloon analogy_.

[@leonroberson6571]

.....that's the great attractor. A big bang then big crunch. We're being pulled to the End that has already started

[@michaelrenouf9173]

Don’t we know the origin of mass already? I thought the Higgs field basically explained why mass exists in our universe and has been proven to exist experimentally? I think the better question to ask is there something about dark matter or gravity we aren’t getting at stupendous scales ?

[@rebeccasmith8848]

No. Simply put the more information that scientists get, the more questions that we have. The puzzle is coming together. But with each piece we are able to look and see just how complex and advance this puzzle actually is

[@michaelrenouf9173]

@@kingoficeking8704 well no we can. We can experimentally verify the existence of the Higgs boson and its interactions in the Higgs field. This is literally the origin what gives mass to all the particle in the standard model of particle physics. We don’t even know if dark matter has any type of particle anti particle pair either. For all we know dark matter is just a breakdown of relativity and we need another theory for gravity at even larger scales.

[@innertubez]

Why does the Laniakea Cluster look like the lung’s alveoli

[@stephenmedley5844]

how does that work, that the great attractor pulls all galaxies and yet the univers expands at the speed of light?

[@Henkvanpeer]

Or are we looking in wrong, opposite direction? If gravity were repellent at great distances?! That it is in fact a big repellor on the other side that we are heading too?,

[@justanotheryoutubechannel3102]

Great Attractor = BIG CRUNCH! The universe isn't moving away from us, we're moving away from it. At least SOME doppler shift, if not motion related, might be TEMPORAL! Time is moving slower in our back yard

[@trebell885]

Is there a greater attraction, than the great attraction we know so far?

[@charlesbaldo]

You are getting close to assuming God.

[@sonarbangla8711]

GREAT ATTRACTOR IMPLIES A GREAT REPELLOR.

[@markopecinovic4475]

The great repellor is basically dark energy.

[@sonarbangla8711]

You could be right.@@markopecinovic4475

[@markpagtama7954]

The dipole repeller.

[@sonarbangla8711]

Please explain?@@markpagtama7954

[@thewolfking2.033]

It's a giant black hole pulling all galaxies it's what you call a mega black hole. Great Attractor That's what it is.

[@nulliusinverba4942]

We deduct there is a great attractor because the light is more redshifted in this direction, which is also partially obscured by our own Milky Way. Redshift could be caused by something other than the Doppler effect, like refraction. Just saying.

[@davidanderson9074]

If we are moving towards it, it is blue shifted. Time is the other mystery as far as spectral light shift. Are we seeing spectrum changes acording to how things ARE moving, or were moving?

[@ClinyTifton]

National Geographic called it the Grand Attracter 3 decades ago. 🤔🤷🏼‍♂️✨

[@frankjoseph4273]

One more thing to worry about

[@frankjoseph4273]

We're doomed I'm chimping

[@eljefe3993]

What ever happens will happen… I don’t worry about it because I cannot help it so.. I will continue on my hamster wheel

[@Charlotte-xh4lt]

Gravity rules in space. Scientists are working harder than ever to help us to understand different galaxies and gravity in motion. The cosmic web is a matrix. Remember Sophia?

[@justinwallace2854]

Sooooo.... what they call "The Big Crunch" has already started?

[@johnhodgson8684]

No because we are still expanding due to dark matter so we will never reach this anomaly, we are actually getting further away from it while simultaneously being pulled towards it .

[@najarhgnis]

Alnert: ohh few dead hearts are roamings in space and lots of ok ya mfs what is listenings ya its very wired 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢......

[@najarhgnis]

Moon : it's like his timeline started ,ok ya it's a space here anybody's connects ok ya ........

[@dahmc59]

if we are heading to the GA, then the crap about galaxies flying away from us ftl aint our fate to be alone to not see them

[@johnhodgson8684]

No because what it doesn't say is we are expanding faster than we are being pulled so although we are all heading that way we are getting further away from it and each other everyday.

[@thatssoironic]

You forgot to mention that our universe is really just an atom within a giant turtle named Mataurin. And giant really isn’t the right word. Gargantuan, beyond all knowable size works better.

[@noskillz6283]

For all the "it's not invisible" ladies and gentlemen, I suggest you look up the definition of invisible.

[@TWJfdsa]

lol, ain't no dark matter.....

[@mehtapramod23]

WE SHOULD INVEST HEAVILY ON ISRO FOR NEXT 20 YEAR IF WE WANT TO BE SUPER POWER UP TO 2047

[@samirhachad643]

ARE WE THRE WET🤷

[@revanchist5596]

This might have been more interesting, but I shut it off after hearing the same phrases repeated 3 times in the first half. Either they think their viewers are too dense, or they're desperate to pad the video time.

[@mathisnotforthefaintofheart]

I left Andromeda to migrate to the Milky way

[@markhathaway9456]

Don't worry. They're on a collision path anyway.

[@stuartverus980]

It’s either the singularity at the centre of the universe sized black hole we’re sitting in or yo mama. Or a cosmic string. Or maybe God pulled the plug out? Or the mass of all the frigging socks I’ve lost. On balance it’s probably the socks.

[@normanlefkowitz5197]

Not the Attractor, rather the Great Pulsator.

[@ramonpunsalang3397]

Traylor Swift? 😂 😂

[@ronaldkemp3952]

The theory of mass and motion "gravity" is incomplete. Scientists have been saying it for many many years. In fact, dark matter and dark energy were proposed to account for a great percentage of the motion they can't normally explain. A whopping 95% of the motion occurring to visible matter in the universe cannot be explained by the theories of mass and motion. According to my calculations the estimate is much higher, about 99.86%. What if galaxies and stars are not only in motion because of mass, gravity, but also because they are slowly propelling themselves like star ships, spewing a constant solar wind over time? If they were propelling themselves over time, then I proposed their motion would be a factor of their age, IE., motion over time. I refer to it as the AP theory in my books, AP for accelerated propulsion. Meaning if every star and every galaxy are being self propelled though space, the motion in question then should be an exact ratio to their age. We can do the calculations without using a telescope. The Milky Way galaxy is said to be 13.7 billion years old and our solar system is said to be 4.5 billion years old. The Milky Way is moving at an unexplained velocity of 381 mi/s, which equates to about 1,370,000 mi/h. Our solar system is orbiting the galaxy core at around 149 mi/s, which equates to about 536,000 mi/h. When we do the calculations, taking the amount of matter in the galaxy and our distance from the barycenter of mass we should be orbiting at around 86,000 mi/h. 536,000 - 86,000 = 450,000 mi/h. Okay if the stars and galaxies are all being propelled slowly over time then all we have to do is take their age and divide it by the unexplained velocity to see if they are the same ratios for both stars and galaxies. If they are then that's what's happening to them, not dark matter, not dark energy, not a great attractor. One single explanation. Lets do it. age / velocity. Milky Way = 13,700,000,000 / 1,370,000 = 10,000 solar system = 4,500,000,000 / 450,000 = 10,000 Even though they have different values for their mass they have the same 10,000 to 1 ratio between their age and unexplained velocity. This simply implies the solar system and galaxy are slowly propelling themselves like star ships slowly over time. I did the calculations and this slow ion propulsion is 0.00000482 in/s² (0.0000122 cm/s²). I then did the same calculations for 6 different satellite galaxies orbiting the Milky Way and got the same 10,000 to 1 ratio between their age and unexplained velocities. So, it's no coincidence. Stars and galaxies slowly propel themselves at a rate of 1 mi/h (1.61 km/h) increase in velocity every 10,000 years. Dark matter is dead, dark energy is dead and the great attractor is dead too. All the unexplained motion occurring throughout the universe can be explained by the AP theory.

[@maxstrelets263]

Ah, the allure of neat numerical coincidences - always a crowd-pleaser but not exactly the backbone of scientific discovery. Remember, correlation is not causation, no matter how tempting it is to connect those dots. These numbers need more than a wink and a nudge to transform into a solid theory. We're talking robust framework and hard empirical evidence here, not just a fancy magic trick with statistics.

[@ronaldkemp3952]

@@maxstrelets263 It's no longer a correlation if every star, every satellite galaxy and even the Milky Way galaxy have the same 10,000 to 1 ratios between their age and unexplained velocities. It would be a coincidence or correlation if just 2 stars had the same slow acceleration rate, but not the satellite galaxies and even our own Milky Way. Simply check to see how many other stars, satellite galaxies and host galaxies have the same ratio of 10,000 to 1 between their age and unexplained velocity. I'm sure if it's just a coincidence it wouldn't take long to find instances where it didn't work, possible because a high velocity star was flung out of a multiple star system. Go ahead, be my guest, do the study yourself.

[@maxstrelets263]

@@ronaldkemp3952 While the 10,000 to 1 ratio you've observed is intriguing, it's important to understand that scientific theories are built on more than just patterns or correlations, no matter how consistent they may seem. A key aspect of scientific inquiry is the ability to explain phenomena through testable mechanisms and predictions, not just through observed ratios. In the case of your theory, for it to gain scientific credibility, it would need to be rigorously tested and validated through a range of observations and experiments, ideally by independent researchers. This would involve not only checking other stars and galaxies for the same ratio but also understanding and explaining the underlying mechanism that would cause such propulsion, and how it aligns with established laws of physics. Furthermore, consistency in a pattern doesn't automatically imply a causative relationship. In astrophysics, especially, where we're dealing with immensely complex systems, numerous factors could lead to similar observational outcomes. A comprehensive theory would need to account for these variables and offer explanations that are consistent with what we already understand about physics, particularly gravity and motion. I am genuinely curious about your work and would be glad to get acquainted with your research. Can I find it on arXiv or researchgate? I encourage continuing this kind of curious inquiry, but also suggest considering the broader scientific context and the rigorous processes required to establish new theories in the field of cosmology.

[@bugeyedwillypetfarm9625]

Space balls were going plad

[@bugeyedwillypetfarm9625]

Samsung phone it spells in biden

[@edstauffer426]

Topographically speaking the Milky Way and andromeda are like towns in a mountain pass almost everything around us is located in a deeper gravity well. In the early universe the gravity wells were deeper due to containing almost all Liquid Dark Matter. Stars and AGN vaporize and lower the content of LDN which has been slowly decreasing since then. Lower LDN also means less compact galaxies, smaller stars and less AGN. We talk about gravity bending spacetime but no one talks about the effect of that bending on the overall topography of spacetime ie smaller black hole for the Milky Way and lower concentration of LDM. The topography of the universe over time and how it changes nothing but our perceptions. If dark matter changes states between a liquid and gaseous state then there would have been a time where almost all of the dark matter would have been in a liquid state due to the even temperature distribution of the universe. The condensing of dark matter may have contributed to that uniformity of temperature. If the dark matter was in its liquid state then baryonic and dark matter would have been much more concentrated. This would have resulted in deeper gravity wells. The time in these gravity wells to us would seem to be moving slower to us. But due to dark matter condensing the baryonic matter would also have been cooled and rushing together. Once stars were formed and black holes became active the ratio of liquid to gaseous dark matter would have decreased over time thus affecting the evolution of particle masses. And making the gravity wells progressively shallower and larger in diameter over time. Light red shifts as it climbs out of a gravity well. Thus the further you go back in time the more light is redshifted. This would leave everything the same with the exception of our perception that the universe is expanding. Also if a big portion of the redshift is from climbing out of a deeper gravity well then we are not looking as far into the past as we think. Phase transitioning dark matter could also answer several of the biggest questions in cosmology.😮 This may be proven by over a hundred blue shifted galaxies that are located within a 6 degree area of the Virgo cluster. I believe these are in a filament rising out of the other side of the cluster into a void area. Because the filament is rising gravitationally toward a void the increasing blueshift makes these galaxies look like the are in the Virgo cluster.

[@seanhewitt603]

What is seen as normal matter, hydrogen to mendelevium and higher, is the liquid state. Blackholes the solid state and the higgs field, the gaseous state of time. 'Dark matter' is a phase transition from a gaseous state to a liquid state, condensation. Plug time into the laws of thermodynamics. Then watch light pass THROUGH time, see time react to the passage and change states.

[@dwainmolinaro2350]

Nothing new under the sun.

[@atticuswalker8970]

he keps calling it the great attractor. but everything isnt moving toward it. we observe influence on mass like gravity. so its gravity. so lets change our understanding of gravity. before we invent new words. does a valley curve space different from a hill. whats the opposite of mass to cause gravity. the absence of mass. the opposite effect. seems obvious. to someone like me.

[@jefferinno]

Obvious to someone like you? Someone who doesn’t know how to string a coherent sentence together? Ok 😂

[@ronaldkemp3952]

Don't listen to the NANCY'S and KAREN's out there. Keep doing what you do, keep questioning the science. That's what we're supposed to be doing. Never accept theories as fact because they are only guesses.

[@atticuswalker8970]

@@jefferinno someone who has an idea that fits all observable fact and explains many of the unsolved mystery. just not the current math . which doesn't.

[@atticuswalker8970]

@@jefferinno the people who built the pyramids understood time dialation around mass. that's why they put as much mass as they could. in the smallest possible space and lived for so long. seems obvious.

[@jefferinno]

@@atticuswalker8970 You’re saying the pyramids distorted time and made them live longer? That’s so far out there I ain’t even gonna say nothing. You do you bro

[@joeleon5786]

The great dictation, and direction. Of our destination. It’s called the triple D

[@pipedreams57]

99.9% theoretical here.

[@maconcamp472]

The Never Ending Story has been trending in my universe for quite a while now. I have no doubts we're storytelling here. They shift stars.🎆🎇✨🔭🐦 The story I'm telling, I try to tell from the perspective of the collective here. When I hit key notes in my story, I can feel it ignite my moons into stars.🎩🍄🐰🤩 Eureka!!🌠 Imagine the whole universe like a melting pot, popsicle, or candle; revealing a secret as it all thaws. The ice age ending.🦕🦖🥚 Super pets are on their way. What does that exactly mean!!!?🤷‍♀️🤷‍♂️🐾🐶🐈 We'll figure it out together!!🙅‍♀️🙅‍♂️ I've definitely got us watching movies in the sky together.💁‍♂️🍿💁‍♀️🍿📽🎬🎞📺 In a scenario like Jupiter and its estimated 90 or so moons, I imagine them someday igniting and manifesting here into Pluto. Representing cloud 9 and the 9th dimension.🌫🐶🐾🌫🐶🐾🌫🐶🐾🌫 Go further and imagine our super Earth with its own moons and they've evolved into a secret garden. 🌱🥀🌹🐞 I bet the dragons would love that too!!🦄🐉🧙‍♀️🧙‍♂️ We got galaxy collisions, twin flame connections, and flowery moons.🌌 Feel the vibrations!!!🐝🌻 Magnetism!!!😇😇😇 The shivers, quivers, and purrthquakes will create a timelapse effect, as the nervous system powers up. Activating our major chakras/pyramids. Creating erosion!! It's happening to me right now.👨‍✈️✈👨‍🚀🚀👽🛸 The Earth evolves around the sun, the same way the thought of love would in your mind, as you're evolving here yourself. Expanding!!💚 Then like any thought, give it enough energy, and you can accelerate the process. Eventually that thought of Earth gains enough momentum to fling itself out of its current orbit. This is how we create everything!! As for a super Earth, to me, it represents Mercury Rising. You're taking the thought of 3D Earth and flinging it across the universe. Like a frisbee!!🌡💔💕💖💗💞💝 Once again, I'm super impressed with mother universe's creativity, but not so much the difficulty of this experience. Momma definitely needs a spanking. Which I'm assuming she wants!! That's my current relationship with her.🙂🤗😍🤩 It feels like the more we awaken, the closer we get to our twin flame. Our true personalities coming out more. It gets this weird for me. I love and adore most of it. Purrthquakes!! I'm still missing the point to this whole experience. Earthquakes!! Why not just skip to the juicy stuff? I know we can.🍇🍈🍉🍊🍋🍌🍍🍎🍏🍐🍑🍒🍓🥥🥝 It makes me want to scream!!😱💜 I'm definitely getting the vibe we're dreaming from our heaven on Earth. We're already hooked.🐟🌞 Just focus on everything that's good, matching those thoughts to higher dimensions. We're all adorable.👶 Powerful souls wrapped in a human body. The ingredients already within us. Like a yummy sandwich. 😋 Nov 9th 6:25 pm!! My happy string of lights in the night sky are back.🦇🌟🦇🌟🦇🌟🦇🌟🦇🌟🦇 Just like origami, our lives are folding in and out, and the magic then either comes or goes. I'm gaining more perspective and trying so hard to produce more magic.⛩ We keep looking up!!🎈🎈🎈 5G technology would also be connected to the 5th dimension. Thank you, Jupiter!!💚 We don't settle!!!🐃🐂 We keep mooooooving forward.🐮 6G to infinteG!!🙀 G strings!!👙 We're following the sound of music.💃🕺🎵🎶🎷🎸🎹🎺🎻🥁 A frequency we can all gravitate to.📻 Neverland!!🧚‍♂️🧚‍♀️ I can definitely imagine the north star as the next singularity.💡🏳️‍🌈 All the light from the stars being drawn in. I've been staying tuned.🕵️‍♀️ Constantly monitoring the situation. We need more power!!📰🗞📚 My cosmic perspective.🐶🐾

[@mgabriel2636]

The milkyway is moving at 2500 times the speed of a plane Relative to what?

[@mgabriel2636]

@maxstrelets263 The earth's surface is moving with the Milky Way, so, obviously not.

[@maxstrelets263]

@@mgabriel2636 p.s. Imagine being on a boat floating down a river. Your speed can be measured relative to the riverbank (a stationary reference), or to another boat (a moving reference). Similarly, the Milky Way's speed is measured relative to stationary or moving reference points in the universe, not the Earth's surface.

[@davidanderson9074]

Yes, all space motions are relative to our understanding of other objects. I am guessing relative to the galaxies in the immediate vicinity of the great attractor.

[@mgabriel2636]

@@davidanderson9074 My point exactly. There are no objectively stationary objects, only objects stationary relative to something else.

[@mgabriel2636]

As in the earth moves beneath Chuck Norris' feet? Which is actually stationary? You can't determine without a third object.

[@trainmaster0217]

I don't believe it.

[@unisophia]

flushed down the cosmic toilet…

[@altonyoung3734]

I stopped watching at the mention of dark matter🙄. We live in an Electric Universe⚡

[@alienmemories]

I'm alien myself I don't approve that

[@Mantreaus]

In a few decades... Hmmm... Well, that was wrong. Science is finding an answer while finding thousands of new questions.

[@michellebeckham5310]

The universe is a giant toilet and we're being flushed.

[@Koyoshinkai]

A bunch of Scientists tells us the universe is expanding & another tells us we are being pulled towards the Great Attractor, but wait there's more, Andromeda Galaxy is heading towards Earth on a collision course, but why Andromeda is travelling faster towards us, & The Great Attractor is pulling The Milky Way & Andromeda towards it, lol

[@user-uc6hh1rm4w]

Its better to stay quiet and people think you a fool, than to open your mouth and confirm it

[@jeffpurnell864]

The space between 2 objects is expanding but if an object is moving towards another faster than the expansion if will move towards it.

[@user-oy6xb9wi2b]

If the Universe isn't real, then how can we be pulled towards great attractor,????

[@charlesbaldo]

Good point, what is real?

[@ronaldkemp3952]

Keep doing what you do, question the so called science. That's how science is done.

[@powerdude_dk]

The narrator repeats itself a lot of times in this video

[@philshifley4731]

Space Matters brings nothing new to the story of the great attractor. Just another repeat by a wanna be influencer.

[@theincrediblefella7984]

Literally any and all evidence points to the exact opposite of the great attraction, fool.

[@Lex-qv4hx]

🤓🤓🤓🤓😴😴😴😴 God dang I need some Adderall and 6000 gnomes?.........

[@AstroInfinitum]

Needs a different narrator

[@charlesbaldo]

The great attractor is also the great creator. Some may call it "God"

[@SSJ3Palmer]

Typical response. Wrong again. Put down the Sacramento wine and stop pretending to think you know about me or anything else.

[@keyscook]

Assumptions, based on assumptions, based on assumptions...etc. Ad nauseam !