Weak Nuclear Force and Standard Model of Particle Physics

Рет қаралды 219,568

Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 549

@EugeneKhutoryansky 5 жыл бұрын

To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available). --To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable. --To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video. --If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.

@cheguevara2251 3 жыл бұрын

votre présentation est magnifique, Eugène, merci.

@Kokyiintx 3 жыл бұрын

I tried, it was still way above my head :)

@SpotterVideo 3 жыл бұрын

Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons. Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.

@rayagoldendropofsun397 2 жыл бұрын

What is anti matter particles made of ?

@paulhk2727 4 жыл бұрын

Here's the short version: The W-Boson is the magician amongst the elementary particles

@NoimannAlive 2 жыл бұрын

a W-izard

@WildEngineering 6 жыл бұрын

I love how you got the W and Z animations to emerge from inside the shapes. Very nice!

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks. I am glad you liked my animations.

@alexanderkorol677 5 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Did you make all of these yourself?

@EugeneKhutoryansky 5 жыл бұрын

Alexander, yes I make all the animations for my videos myself.

@alexanderkorol677 5 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky So you do everything?

@EugeneKhutoryansky 5 жыл бұрын

My friend Kira does the narration.

@bytefu 6 жыл бұрын

I am amazed by amounts of knowledge a typical particle physicist must possess. Surely, these animations took an incredible amount of work to be done. Thank you Eugene and Kira for such a rigorous explanation.

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@crowxe 6 жыл бұрын

These Physics Videos are my final resort when other videos overwhelm me with complicated explanations

@vishaljain4915 5 жыл бұрын

@@Brad-qw1te Trust me your not lol this isn't an easy topic. But this is the best explanation on it.

@mybluemars 6 жыл бұрын

I miss the days when an atom was made up of just 3 elementary particles.

@hinkles73 4 жыл бұрын

Quarks are still fascinating though!

@lass7212 4 жыл бұрын

Mot like we can go back

@samkes1061 4 жыл бұрын

What about colour charge

@baiwuli6781 4 жыл бұрын

but an atom is still made up of just 3 elementary particles: up quarks, down quarks and electrons

@wolfgangtscheu7132 3 жыл бұрын

I still stick to that idea and can explain a lot more than the Standard Modell with that assumption.

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

If you like this video, you can help more people find it in their KZbin search engine by clicking the like button, and writing a comment. Thanks.

@shubham1999 6 жыл бұрын

Very Good Video Sir.

@veerukumar250 6 жыл бұрын

Sir, please made a video on atomic structure consisting of full information about atomic orbital.

@crowxe 6 жыл бұрын

Already subbed

@charlesbrightman4237 6 жыл бұрын

Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty. _______________________________________________________________________________ Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.

@pronounjow 6 жыл бұрын

@@charlesbrightman4237 This wall of text needs to be its own video. A bit TL;DR there.

@taralgondalia1335 5 жыл бұрын

It is an underrated channel. You guys certainly deserve more subscribers. Amazing animation and presentation

@EugeneKhutoryansky 5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

@tonybaston3419 4 жыл бұрын

These videos have the right amount of simplicity so that I can actually feel like I learned something. Love them!

@sulfursw9286 5 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much! I guess this is one of the best popular explaination of the weak nuclear force in the internet.

@EugeneKhutoryansky 5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

@burningsilicon149 6 жыл бұрын

Can you do a video on The Higgs mechanism this format is perfect for it.

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

The Higgs field is on my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.

@Topspeedcraft 6 жыл бұрын

Yes yes yes yes yes please

@fjames208 4 жыл бұрын

Cool

@hinkles73 4 жыл бұрын

That's what I was going to say!

@hinkles73 4 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Speaking of the Higgs field, I wonder how the top quark gets massive enough, I mean, it's a paradoxical loop ( it's a bit short-lived, so it might not have had enough time to get mass, which means it couldn't decay, but it does, etc.).

@pierredecalan7497 6 жыл бұрын

Great job ! This channel deserves far more subscribers :-)

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks!!!

@Quantum_GirlE 6 жыл бұрын

The way of explanation in his videos make it much easier for beginners to understand! Trying to find a simpler way to teach my son these things, this is perfect! Amazing visuals and editing. Talented person!

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@brogcooper25 6 жыл бұрын

Best physics videos on KZbin?

@Rationalific 3 жыл бұрын

Wow! W+, W-, and Z bosons were always (since I learned about them) such a mystery to me! This video helped me understand them more than any other video (or other media) I've seen on them. I'm still interested in learning more about "rest mass", but wow...this was amazingly informative!

@EugeneKhutoryansky 3 жыл бұрын

I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.

@Rationalific 2 жыл бұрын

@Cliff Jumper Thanks a lot for that long explanation! It did clear things up! I guess I thought that while weight depended on gravity, mass didn't change. But like with length and time, it seems that mass also changes depending on the observer and the changes become more apparent as the speed of light is (nearly) reached. I appreciate you taking the time to inform me!

@olbluelips 2 жыл бұрын

Wow, the weak force is bizarre. Almost whimsical-feeling! Great explanations and animations

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link: kzbin.info_video?ref=share&v=iIWTRwJlrGo You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately. Details about adding translations is available at support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en Thanks.

@Arseniy_Arseniy 5 жыл бұрын

What's the difference between pion (quark+ anti-quark) that proton and neutron exchange and W-bozone (the same charge, the same parity, the same decay products- electron+ electron anti-neutrino) ? Thank you PS please, like me to see the answer

@quahntasy 6 жыл бұрын

Eugene is back with another cool video!

@joshuasukup2488 2 жыл бұрын

I am so glad for the animations, they really help me to wrap my head around the concepts!

@EugeneKhutoryansky 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks. I am glad that my animations are helpful.

@ximipa3mahezthasulthansyadi 3 жыл бұрын

🤯 Wow. Good explanation. I love visualization of concepts. It helps me staying away from misconceptions. And helps my understanding by a ton

@EugeneKhutoryansky 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@constpegasus 6 жыл бұрын

Keep these videos coming please. I appreciate the work and it helps me out understanding particle physics.

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

More videos are on their way.

@coloradowilderness3139 6 жыл бұрын

Best ever and best wishes for Eugene...

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@RobertoCerv90 Жыл бұрын

Was so much interesting, and complex. To see only once

@MichelRamosThe-Human 6 жыл бұрын

Subscribed! Wow what a beautiful voice!!!

@atiqrahman7289 Жыл бұрын

Extensive knowledge ---- huge Information---- difficult to perceive and diffucult to remember. Oh,MY GOD so extensive is this!! Oh, more than exhausting information. VERY ,VERY EXHAUSTING IS ALL THIS!!

@baskarans2509 5 жыл бұрын

Awesome sir, continue your work of spreading the thirst for knowledge on Physics through your videos. Yipheeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@EugeneKhutoryansky 5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment. More videos are on their way.

@baskarans2509 5 жыл бұрын

Awaiting eagerly for the videos sir!

@oriongurtner7293 2 жыл бұрын

I have one thing to add: there is a close representation (not perfect, but close) in a branch of classical physics for chirality, and that’s the direction of the spiral in a screw’s thread It has a rotational element even at rest, and uses a similar ‘left/right-handedness’ for its ‘direction’, and even though they both exist, you’re most likely to find the one kind, since the other just flat out doesn’t work with the same hardware Granted that’s from mechanical engineering, not physics or mathematics, but engineering is one of the practical applications of maths and sciences, soooo 🤷‍♂️

@maxa.9135 4 жыл бұрын

Great video, really helps to get a picture behind all the Maths.

@EugeneKhutoryansky 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@orbismworldbuilding8428 Жыл бұрын

So is a Z boson just a fancy photon with mass that can split into or be made from any matter/antimatter particle?

@deepakb5547 6 жыл бұрын

Eugene you have done a great job.

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@abramthiessen8749 6 жыл бұрын

Thank you, Eugene.

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

You are welcome and thanks.

@4grammaton 7 ай бұрын

"The top quark has a much larger rest mass than the other quarks" "When dealing with the top quark, the weak force is usually the strongest force in existence" Should the top quark be renamed the "chad quark"?

@papayawalivsliftwali9373 4 жыл бұрын

I didn't understand a single word but i felt like am in paradise. ...lol

@Parapresdokian 3 жыл бұрын

The BGM at the beginning was felt like I'm saving the universe.

@DiamondSane 6 жыл бұрын

Weak Nuclear Force and Standard Model of Particle Physics All in15 minutes

@chair547 5 жыл бұрын

The metaphor I prefer for virtual particles is that you're borrowing energy from the vacuum and you have to give it back. The more energy you borrow the sooner you have to give it back.

@stevenschilizzi4104 2 жыл бұрын

Brilliant and illuminating, as usual. Especially the last part about why the WF appears to us as being so weak. It is a kind of statistical illusion due to the rarity of such interactions. Meanwhile, the lifespan of a tau is itself very short. It adds up and makes sense. Though one may ask: why has Nature gone to the trouble of all this complexity??

@EugeneKhutoryansky 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks. As for the question of why nature works that way, that is a metaphysical question which we only can speculate about.

@the_kingslayer 6 жыл бұрын

Yes best physics Channel absolutely I love it

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

@CaptainShaq_ 6 жыл бұрын

You always blow my mind out of my head....its really good and knowledgefull documentation. .. Thanks

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@jonathanshafter1800 6 жыл бұрын

Fantastic series

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks. Glad you like it.

@kevinmartin2961 6 жыл бұрын

Are you planning a video on the Higgs mechanism? Like your QCD video, you could also add the interaction symmetry - SU(2) X U(1) - after all, not doing so is roughly analogous to showing a pictorial description of gravity sans the formula F=G(mm')/R^2. An overview of the Higgs mechanism may be the best place to start.

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Yes, the Higgs mechanism is on my list of topics for future videos, as is group theory. Thanks.

@emancipationproclaimation173 6 жыл бұрын

You deserve more views and subscribers than this. Awesome videos😘😘😘..keep up the good work

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

@nadadenada319 6 жыл бұрын

I'm just helping Eugene by making a comment

@kevinoduor9841 3 жыл бұрын

im so happy i stumbled on this

@mckehra14 6 жыл бұрын

So does the weak force act like a "force"? In which cases it repels and attracts like all the other fundamental forces? And if not, and it's only about the transformations, then why the name "force"? Or is there some kind of momentum transfer when the interaction occurs?

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Yes, there is momentum transferred in the weak nuclear force.

@mckehra14 6 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Well, there must be always momentum transferred in any interactions, since all particles have it (btw because of this I dont understand how the attractive phenomena is possible. Negative momentum?) But what properties of particles define whether there will be an attraction or a repulsion with another particle via the weak force? Again, if of course the weak force really acts as a "force" because you haven't answered that. But still big thanks of course!

@irithel-qy7db 10 ай бұрын

Hey, when the down quark turns into an up quark and the up quark turns into a down quark, is the electrical charge of the quarks transferred by w-w+ bosons? Also, after the up quark turns into a down quark and the up quark turns into a down quark, where do the electric charges come from? Does w- w+ come from bosons or is it a phenomenon arising from the nature of quarks?

@Neccronix 6 жыл бұрын

So how does this tie in with the dark and light side of the force?

@Trotskisty 6 жыл бұрын

Each midi-clorian has its anti-midi-clor.

@Pingwn 5 жыл бұрын

@@Trotskisty provided that the total amount of force-users is preserve

@uwuifyingransomware 5 жыл бұрын

But there can only be 2 Sith Lords at a time, so either Jedi are weak or there are wannabes in their ranks

@Pingwn 5 жыл бұрын

@@uwuifyingransomware the light side is the weak force and Luke is the top quark

@Rayne-jx6sl 10 ай бұрын

Hey, when the up quark becomes a down quark and the down quark becomes an up quark due to the weak interaction, where does the electric charge of the down quark and the up quark come from? Does the w boson give this electric charge or is it an event arising from the nature of the quark?

@zakirhussain-js9ku 2 жыл бұрын

Matter & space are made of microscopic mass, electric & magnetic particles. Increase in density of these particles induces repulsive & decrease attractive force. In heavier atoms density of these particles is higher which induces repulsive force. This results in spontaneous release of these particles along with other constituents of atoms. Relese of these particles decreases the density which makes the atom more stable. Density can also be increased by adding a neutron which also tips the density balance and split the atom.

@omsingharjit 4 жыл бұрын

Where weak nuclear force is found ? Inside protons, neurones or everywhere?

@criskity 5 жыл бұрын

3:43 "phenomena" is plural. The singular is "phenomenon".

@damongeo840 3 жыл бұрын

Exactly; it is from the Greek language [φαινόμενον (singular), φαινόμενα (plural)].

@maxwellsimon4538 3 жыл бұрын

I recently heard another explanation that all W boson interactions with quarks smaller than top occur because the W boson's mass can change due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principal in order to not violate conservation of energy, and that this is why beta decay is a rare occurrence.

@sciencepower608 6 жыл бұрын

I have a question. Why exactly do these particles spontaneously transform into different ones like the an electron turning into a -w boson and an electron neutrino. What causes it.

@nadadenada319 6 жыл бұрын

Nobody knows the Origin of anything

@theshadypersonify 6 жыл бұрын

God Bless you Eugene Khutoryansky :)

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@joshuajanowski7424 6 жыл бұрын

Great video, as always. Hope you can help me out with a couple of questions: What do the shapes that you use to depict quarks in these videos represent? Also, I've encountered terms such as 'weak hypercharge' and 'weak Isospin' before but I've never understood what these properties are or how they relate to the weak force. Do you have any explanation that could help me with that?

@chromacat248 4 жыл бұрын

if 3b1b discovered the third dimension

@lmiones Жыл бұрын

Nice presentation! At 9 m or so it shows a clear parallel between W's boson theory and pi meson theory of nuclear force; EWT was initially called Quantum Flavor Dynamics ... is there a duplication (conceptual correspondence?) between EWT and the One Boson Exchange (pion, omega, rho) theory of Nuclear Force? Or is it a "refinement"?

@kengounited 6 жыл бұрын

Greatly appreciate your efforts, your physics understanding, and your musical taste; hope you'll play Rimsky-Korsakov (Scheherazade maybe) in your next video :-)

@yogran1 5 жыл бұрын

I love your videos! It always helps me get a more intuitive understanding of these concepts. I have a question: At 14:18 what do you mean by the time duration being smaller? Does the W boson exist for a shorter time? Also if it is possible for these virtual particles to interact then why do we consider them virtual?

@robertcalkjr.8325 6 жыл бұрын

Really nice visuals, thanks!

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@robertcalkjr.8325 6 жыл бұрын

You're welcome. The only problem that I have is believing that "zero" exists in the universe. It seems to me that even if a particle has zero mass, it should at least have a charge, "-0 or +0". But I don't know the mathematics. Maybe someone can explain how zero can exist in the quantum universe.

@pestypig 6 жыл бұрын

Finally an in-depth look! Thank you

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@burningoyster 6 жыл бұрын

You blow my mind every time

@educationyoutube9253 6 жыл бұрын

Very good as always!

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

@nitinhirve7854 6 жыл бұрын

Mam please please make a video on....how all communication process works....how sound waves converted into electrical signal...n most important how actually electrical signals converted into radio waves..what hardwarr runs there...n then how that signals get transitted throght air.

@wordprocessbrian4497 6 жыл бұрын

research US Army mos 31F network switching systems operator and maintainer. manuals should be online. Engineers write the manuals so an 8th grader can understand.

@Mernom 5 жыл бұрын

Sound>electric=any sort of microphone.

@mikeclarke952 6 жыл бұрын

Question: How can the W boson transform into all 3 types of leptons with each having such different masses from each other, when the corresponding neutrinos all have a mass of practically zero? Is it all just explained with velocity of the products?(i.e the electron would be moving the fastest). Edit: I didn't wait until 13:40 when you explained the violation.

@topten7064 5 жыл бұрын

Great thank you very much

@prateekjainphysics 4 жыл бұрын

Best physics channel

@EugeneKhutoryansky 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

@Ardalambdion 6 жыл бұрын

You explain things that are seemingly impossible to grasp by normal people in ways that we can comprehend :)

@EugeneKhutoryansky 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@王海-w6x 4 жыл бұрын

i feel like watchinthis video is like learning about the pieces of some weird chess game

@123TeeMee 4 жыл бұрын

So can a particle just absorb as many Z bosons as it wants or only one or what, and can it emit them whenever? I realise this is a very vague question...

@AllYourMemeAreBelongToUs 3 ай бұрын

1:00 “Each particle has an associated antimatter particle with the same mass but the opposite electric charge thereby doubling the number of particles.”