Philosophy of Physics

From Newton and Maxwell to General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Dark Matter, and Dark Energy. The nature of fundamental physical laws.
My Patreon account is at / eugenek

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available). --To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable. --To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video. --If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.

[@juano3000]

I developed a hypothesis for a Mechanical Overview of Quantum Physics. I would like to send it to you, for review.

[@SerVahnt]

Time doesn’t even exist nor has it ever existed. Just because we are born into a realm that appears to be decaying and corrupted. Our bodies/temples/avatars are withering away because of sin. Sin will always lead towards rot and filth. Just because the luminaries are in fixed position above in our sky/firmament doesn’t mean time is passing. LoL. Fear is what is destroying our fellow man, lack of proper knowledge and genuine wisdom is what many are lacking today.

[@jeminkukadiya5636]

I love philosophy!

[@spiritualconnection360]

Hi I have some questions can you respond

[@airplayrule]

In case youtube deletes my comment before you see it, here it is; 19:18 "Only in the 20th century General relativity and quantum mechanics were discovered" WHAT?? Do I have to give you the Sanskrit word for atoms? or specific time dilation for specific bodies like the polestar in the Vedas? Or are you goona use the word "discover" in a way that your claim here is unfalsifiable, like you did before? Speaking of which: At 12:09 "...to predict the existence of a planet before it had been observed..." But when I said the Vedas mentioned planets, GALAXIES, etc. you said that doesn't count as pre-dating your claims of who the first observer of galaxies were, because those weren't actual observations. So how come here, predicting something without direct observation, somehow counts, and is praiseworthy? Also, our ancient ancestors were MORE advanced in ways WE could only dream of. they had civilizations around for BILLIONS of years, not thousands. and yes, there's evidence for this...assuming you think absence of evidence should be taken as evidence of an absence And isn't it ironic that you accept relativity, yet, act like the Heliocentric model is not equally valid as the Geocentric model??

[@connemignonne]

The analogy with Mercury and Uranus was a very useful device. Love your work.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you liked the analogy and that you like my videos.

[@yavuzbahadrtaktak8020]

There was a Jupiter issue either. Which caused to speed of light calculations.

[@airplayrule]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky 19:18 "Only in the 20th century General relativity and quantum mechanics were discovered" WHAT?? Do I have to give you the Sanskrit word for atoms? or specific time dilation for specific bodies like the polestar in the Vedas? Or are you goona use the word "discover" in a way that your claim here is unfalsifiable, like you did before? Speaking of which: At 12:09 "...to predict the existence of a planet before it had been observed..." But when I said the Vedas mentioned planets, GALAXIES, etc. you said that doesn't count as pre-dating your claims of who the first observer of galaxies were, because those weren't actual observations. So how come here, predicting something without direct observation, somehow counts, and is praiseworthy? Also, our ancient ancestors were MORE advanced in ways WE could only dream of. they had civilizations around for BILLIONS of years, not thousands. and yes, there's evidence for this (not that absence of evidence should be taken as evidence of an absence). And isn't it ironic that you accept relativity, yet, act like the Heliocentric model is not equally valid as the Geocentric model?

[@carultch]

@@airplayrule The geocentric model is a valid point of view to describe the kinematics of the solar system, but it would be agony to use it to explain why the motion is what it is. You end up with epicycles upon epicycles, and ultimately end up having to appeal to the heliocentric model anyway to explain the causes of these exotic paths of motion. The heliocentric model is a lot more useful of a reference frame to describe the motion of the solar system, because the sun is a lot closer to being in an inertial reference frame than the Earth, in ways that matter at this scale.

[@bhanupratapsinghrajawat5233]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky zhfsidixu

[@wiliextreme]

Your videos are awesome, there are not a lot of other yt channels where spending 20minutes is not a waste of time.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+wiliextreme, thanks for the compliment about my videos.

[@_Sophisticated]

Ha

[@frankdimeglio8216]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky THE THEORETICAL, TOP DOWN, CLEAR, AND UNIVERSAL BALANCING OF E=MC2 AS F=MA: Ultimately and truly, time is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, time DILATION proves that E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) I have mathematically unified and BALANCED physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 is necessarily AND CLEARLY F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. INDEED, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. Great. It is CLEARLY AND FULLY proven in what is a BALANCED fashion. E=mc2 IS F=ma. In fact, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEARLY proven. It is a very great truth in physics that the ability of thought to DESCRIBE OR reconfigure sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) INDEED, E=mc2 IS DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma; AS time dilation proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, ultimately and truly, time is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. In fact, INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. Consider the man who is standing on what is the Earth/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. SO, the mathematical unification of Einstein's equations AND Maxwell's equations (given the addition of A FOURTH SPATIAL DIMENSION) proves that E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Look UP at what is the BLUE SKY. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Therefore, the PLANETS (including what is THE MOON) are understood to move away very, very, very, very slightly. Stellar clustering proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Indeed, HALF of the galaxies are "dead" or inert; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AND BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand !!!! Great !!!! By Frank DiMeglio

[@fuckthishandlesystem]

Remember that it's only a relative 20 minutes and you might be able to pass them more quickly if you move faster or further away from the centre of gravity

[@henrywang6931]

BEST. PHYSICS. CHANNEL. EVER.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Henry Wang, thanks for that really great compliment.

[@kartikkaranth2683]

Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky why don't you collobrate with kuerzgesat both of u are best in science videos

[@henrywang6931]

Kartik Karanth They have different target audience, Eugene physics is more aimed at physics students, and Kuerzgesat is aimed at the general public. Altho it would be interesting if they collaborated.

[@commiesbegone2580]

Phisics are still mostly irrelevant

[@erincemrecelikten9125]

@@kartikkaranth2683 +3Blue1Brown :)

[@mohit4715]

5:27 Schrodinger's cat taking revenge 😊

[@timmy18135]

And kills kenny

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link: kzbin.info_video?v=DACcyBN5Jng&ref=share You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately. Details about adding translations is available at support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en Thanks.

[@sandeepoli7505]

Nepali

[@johnrubensaragi4125]

Done.

[@arisan8811]

い

[@dannieluckeyiii4600]

In

[@ZalexMusic]

the pace of this video is excellent!! really love the work you've done, eugene. you've always had quality content, but i'm very happy to see your production improving as well :)

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Alex Ruimy, thanks for the compliment. I deliberately kept the pace of my other videos slow because people who do not have a strong background in science or mathematics needed time to think about each point before moving on to the next one. I increased the pace of this video because this video didn't have things like complicated geometric models that people would need time to think about.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

If you like this video, you can help more people find it in their KZbin search engine by clicking the like button, and writing a comment. Thanks.

[@Kavetrol]

What do you mean by 'it's only approximation' ? There are only approximations in physics. Also, why would you say that Newtonian gravity is incorrect? If you apply Occam's Razor it's more correct than GR for most practical applications.

[@Kavetrol]

What do you mean by 'it's only approximation' ? There are only approximations in physics. Also, why would you say that Newtonian gravity is incorrect? If you apply Occam's Razor it's more correct than GR for most practical applications.

[@Kavetrol]

What do you mean by 'it's only approximation' ? There are only approximations in physics. Also, why would you say that Newtonian gravity is incorrect? If you apply Occam's Razor it's more correct than GR for most practical applications.

[@Luisitococinero]

I'll answer your three questions three times: Newtonian gravity is not correct on its concept. But that doesn't mean it's not useful. Newtonian gravity is not correct on its concept. But that doesn't mean it's not useful. Newtonian gravity is not correct on its concept. But that doesn't mean it's not useful. PS: I'm a computer.

[@kikithatsit2532]

Really i Think the Human can code you.Awesome answers!!

[@fhjfhdgh]

thanks alot for this! i almost never have to pause or rewind parts of your videos, it really goes to show how good you are at the combination of visual and auditory teaching! i really appreciate all the work that goes into these animations, they are always so on point with visualizung what is being explained

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+niv skillsurf, thanks for the compliment, and I am glad to hear that you like my animations.

[@escapethecircle7370]

These videos are amazing. I hope everyone involved in the production of then is very proud!

[@takkiejakkie5458]

The existence of this channel honestly gives me reason to look forward to a new year. So much to learn.

[@IsaacGreear]

This information is a true gift to those who wonder. Thank you.

[@VlanimationTales]

I don't know why, but watching this video and listening to your thorough explanation makes me feel satisfied. It's amazing how far we have come and how far we have yet to go! Keep up the brilliant work. 😊

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@VlanimationTales]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky You're welcome anytime! :)

[@shreytripathi5683]

truly awesome videos by this channel. seen all the videos and liked all of them thumbs up!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+shrey tripathi, thanks for the compliment. I am glad that you have liked all my videos, and thanks for clicking the like button on all of them.

[@mahendransockalingam8819]

It is an amazing channel.All the theory explained in simple manner and it is very easy to understand.Thanks a lot for Eugene.

[@Kabitu1]

Spectacular as always. Keep it up, you're giving us all something new to think about every time.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Kabitu1, thanks for the compliment. Lots more videos are on their way.

[@mander40101]

I am a visual learner, so these videos are very helpful in helping me understand the subject matter. Thank you!

[@Mark-Wilson]

atoms don't look like that tho tis just for understanding they have orbitals not orbits

[@ravindrasahu8738]

Magnificent work Dr.Eugene! One day I and my friend were talking the same that Biology and chemistry are actually physics. We are a great fan of your Work. We are so glad of your Existence in this Universe. How could I forget Kira Vincent?? I am very thankful to you Kira as well.

[@carlolisil7345]

One of the best physics channels on youtube! The visuals and narration are so comprehensible. Keep it up!!!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment.

[@jamesedward9306]

Absolutely outstanding channel. You are my go to channel. Whenever I'm having trouble with a math/science concept I'm always checking to see if Eugene has tackled it in a video that might shed some light for me. I also wander in from time to time to see if you have decided to address something I wasn't even thinking about, for entertainment. I am never disappointed. This channel is in the distinct minority of channels that keep youtube a valuable web page.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the really great compliments.

[@divinemother5138]

God bless you Eugene, a million times. Such excellent videos makes physics so easy to understand which was never before. Watching all your videos and have started loving physics, the credit entirely goes to you. Thanks a ton.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment.

[@JohnSmith-he5xg]

Great analogy about the possible ramifications of Dark Matter and Energy vs the orbits of Mars and Uranus.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@yiankes23]

Great Video, look forward to upcoming videos from this channel. Great content, and amazingly animated.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+alex yiankes, thanks fot the compliment about my video and my animations. Lots more videos are on their way.

[@sudheshnapolaggari2498]

I enjoy them every moment they are very informative and support me in making better decisions..thank you eugene

[@klaik30]

Ive always thought about this :) Nice to see a video of it to get the thoughts going, great vid.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+klaik30, thanks for the compliment. I am glad you liked my video.

[@chronitized]

you sir have cured my porn addiction through my love for all things engineer! Thank you so much *tear* seriously though these are the best representations of classical fundamental phenomena that I have ever experienced. Extremely well made and the quality is astounding. You are an artist and I know you do not know me but, you have done an insanely grand deed for me and I commend you, please dont stop what you are doing! Thanks for this!

[@doggo206]

chronitized miss*

[@delphini8055]

I’m just getting cured of my addiction of meat beating.

[@lix88440000]

I'm not cured

[@markcrnkovich]

@@lix88440000 When you realize, that the actions to you reactions is so predictable that you then get bored with self 'catering', and move on to learning and help figure out what dark matter is. By watching porn, are you the multiuniverse adding more entropy to the whole system, load after load.

[@lix88440000]

@@markcrnkovich that's how you deal with jokes, huh? And doesn't matter what you do in life, you're increasing entropy.

[@dramese]

You put so much effort on this.. And it really paid off, the animation makes much more easier to understand difficult concepts that will no otherwise be fully understand without a lengthy time and energy. I can't believe I can actually have an access to such treasure with no cost. I wish others like me know about this channel. Thank you 👌🏿❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment, and I am glad you like my videos.

[@rotflmaopmpqxyz]

Wow. Definitely the most thought-provoking video yet, thank you so much for creating this video along with all of your others. I am very happy to be subscribed to this channel (:

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+rotflmaopmpqxyz, thanks. I am glad you liked my video, and I am glad to have you as a subscriber.

[@TheChrasse]

wonderful video, Eugene! two of my favorite subjects, philosophy and physics, in the same video.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+TheChrasse, thanks. It can be argued that all physics is philosophy.

[@TheChrasse]

+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky That's right!

[@Fesenfull]

This channel is the best tool for buliding a relational understanding( as opposed to a instrumental one) of physics I've come across. You don't have to answer this, obviously, but have you ever done a interview or something similar(video?), to 'reveal' how you've reached this level/type of understanding? Keep it up!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Snorre Grimstad, thanks for the compliment. I reached this type of understanding simply because every time I learned a new concept in physics or mathematics, I always tried to visualize it in my head without any equations. These animations are the way I had always visualized these concepts.

[@jlunde35]

This is the best video yet out of the many fantastic videos you have made. Thank you and I wish you continued success in the New Year.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Jim Lunde, thanks for the compliment about my video, and I hope that you also have a happy and successful New Year.

[@JimmyFigueroa]

Honestly I love the animation and music tones and voice. Very informative.

[@waterbottle6644]

This should be required viewing for anyone studying in physics. I'm in my fourth year of my physics undergrad, and this has Legitimately done such an incredible job at putting into perspective what I've learnt so far, it's helped remind me of why I wanted to get into physics in the first place. Absolutely beautiful work!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments. I am glad you liked my video.

[@stellar8689]

After a few months in my life where I experienced LSD and studied a lot of mathematics in my own time, mostly geometrical proofs, I saw this view of physics clearly. It also enhanced my overall understanding and passion for physics, so my grades in my undergrad increased significantly

[@paulpalmer6002]

Love your vids bro, keep them coming! Thank u for making them

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Paul Palmer, I am glad that you like my videos. Many more are on their way.

[@lukasaudir8]

these videos are amazing, it conveys a peace felling and easy understanding of the universe... thanks for making it!!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment about my videos.

[@Feynstein100]

Great video as always, Eugene. Looking forward to videos on string theory. Keep up the good work, my friend.

[@Feynstein100]

+Feynstein100 Also, do you know about Stanene? It's supposed to be a *room temperature superconductor* www.nature.com/news/physicists-announce-graphene-s-latest-cousin-stanene-1.18113

[@silvianitti4426]

Field of Application of theories - Great work, always! A little suggestion. As it was already said I would not use the word “incorrect” for Newton's Theory of Gravity and Maxwells Laws of Electromagnetism. I would add an explanation on how each Physics theory is linked to a specific field (or area) of application. So it is not a matter of being correct or incorrect , but it's a matter of how wide is the field of application of the law. The application fields of Einstein gravitational theory includes the application fields of Newton's laws. The first field mentioned is bigger and includes the second one. So Einstein gravitational Theory is more “general”, not “correct” in an absolute terms and neither “more accurate” since the law can’t be separate by its own field of application. More over since Newton's law application field is contained in Einstein-gravitational-theory application field , than Newton's laws are not disprove but are “generalized” by Einstein. As Carl popper wrote “Science is not a system of assertions that are certain or established once and for all, nor is it a system that constantly advances towards a definitive state. Our science is not knowledge (episteme): it can never claim to have reached the truth, nor a substitute for truth like probability... “ To Popper it’s idealistic to look for absolutely-certain and demonstrable knowledge . Thank you for your work

[@ooraculo223]

This was one of the bests KZbin videos i had see in my life. KZbin shold give you a award. Your work is incredible.👏👏👏

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am glad you liked my video. Thanks for the compliment.

[@kjpmi]

I really like your videos. I understand the fundamentals just fine but there's something great about having these videos to refresh your knowledge.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+kjpmi, I am glad that you like my videos. Thanks.

[@rh001YT]

HI! I think it was a bit misleading to say that Newtons and Maxwells Laws were inaccurate as it would be better to say they were incomplete or maybe say they were superficial, they didn't probe deeply enough. But their "Laws" were very important for research into what if anything lay at a deeper level. But it is probably true or safe to say that scientific explanations have become more accurate. However not enough emphasis was given to the difficulties still at the heart of quantum physics such that it might not be that yet more fundamental laws will be discovered but that there may be walls beyond which we can't penetrate. The part about not being able to comprehend other life forms suggested a wall, so I acknowledge that. However equal treatment should have been given to a supposition that there is no life outside of Earth, or if there is it will be comprehensible.

[@ricklujan8670]

rh001YT ... I actually followed what you wrote and I have to thank you !! ... I was amazed by the beautiful bridge of consciousness and the beautiful juxtaposition of this perhaps

[@davidadegboye773]

16:26...

[@davidadegboye773]

Watch the whole video before you comment

[@npip99]

@@ricklujan8670 But, you can't argue that classical theories are correct. They're close, but if the answer is 1.9 and you tell me 2, it's still not correct.

[@ishworshrestha3559]

Ok

[@John77Doe]

Bravo, very well done. You had Dark Matter, and lots of other cutting edge stuff. You are addressing a very ambitious topic of Unified Field Theory head on. Einstein was just trying to unify Maxwell's Equations for Electromagnetic Fields with his General Relativity Equations. In his lifetime, the strong and weak forces were discovered. So the last 20 years of his life would not have succeeded in producing a complete Unified Field Theory.

[@douggwyn9656]

Actually Einstein had hoped to do more than just unify electromagnetism and gravitation, but those two phenomena were foremost. His general methods are currently used in quantum field theories, including string theory, although they also adopt other principles that Einstein would not have accepted.

[@muntee33]

Doug Gwyn Thats because AB was championed in order to advance a vested interest. Even Field Theory and Electrodynamics is confined to the limitations and requirements for the manner of which, time, motion, gravity, force dominance, fundamentals of matter etc etc. imagine being on the forefront of Field Theory and understanding the reason and dynamics of the approximation given to matter and that approximation is the concept of the particle. But still being absolutely limited to including aspects of this concept into your research and progress while still being stuck with ‘electron particle’ and ‘velocity of a photon’ F’ing useless. Imagine what time dialation and gravity (higs boson ‘particle’ does to the resonant and harmonic properties of a field.... Or trying to research and experiment with field dynamics and not being able to even consider the universe as an open system.... and rubbish like string theory, m theory has to be artificially crammed into rubbish like quantum vacuum and dark energy.

[@billmaghan]

Best lecture I've seen all week. And so nicely narrated!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment.

[@student69741]

I just love these videos. They are very much informative. Thanks a lot for bringing them to us. 🙏

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment about my videos.

[@FitnessLoco]

You just got me an A* in physics thanks 😊

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Glad to hear that.

[@smustavee]

I am gradually falling in love with this channel. How can I contact with you guys? I am hypnotized when I watch your videos. Oh! you beauty storytellers of physics.

[@MrNaufan]

Nice explanations. What a great piece of work. This is the most fascinating video I've ever seen.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments. I am glad you liked my explanations.

[@divyaarora158]

Another amazing video, just loved it! Thanks again for this one

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Glad you like my videos. Thanks.

[@PDHo-hl3ld]

This channel is super underrated

[@srijitapaul5080]

No.

[@mucho5656]

This is amazing. I love the example of learning long addition instead of memorizing every sum combination. I would like to point out that as we discover further and deeper into universe, the more we discover about the history of the universe, BUT not the present. Since the speed of light limits us from looking into others' present. Such as when we look at the sun. We are seeing how it was... 8 minutes ago. Good luck on the future of your channel!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Mucho, thanks for the compliment, and I am glad that you liked that example. And yes, you are of course correct that we are always only looking into the past.

[@TheDcfan01]

+Mucho Also, keep in mind that there is no such thing as a universal present moment..

[@saeadabdoli]

Thanks for sharing your brilliant ideas with folk. I can't find suitable words to describe your works and efforts. I only can say You are awesome.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments.

[@kenczepelka9794]

This is seriously one of the very best channels on youtube. Don't ever stop making videos!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment. More videos are on their way.

[@pierrelacombe4757]

Special congratulations to Kira Vincent. Wonderfull clarity of voice permits to me to understand the majority of the explanations, despite the fact that I'm French, and I speak English with difficulties (and with dictionnary) I beg your pardon for mispelling and syntax errors !

[@raykent3211]

Je suis anglais et je peux dire que ce que vous avez écrit là est presque parfait, avec un choix de mots au dessus du niveau ordinaire. Félicitations! Mais le mot "wonderful" s'écrit avec une seule "l" à la fin..... et peut être "with difficulty" (singulier) est un peu préférable dans ce contexte. Voilà, pas grande chose, et je viens de faire plus d'erreurs ici, sans doute!

[@MakS-vb8ed]

What's the name of background music you've used at initial phase during the video?

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

All the music in this video is from the free KZbin audio library, and the names of the songs are the following. Renaissance_Castle Stale Mate Waltz_of_the_Flowers_by_Tchaikovsky

[@philosophyphilosophy903]

Ma'am I love your videos genuinely.

[@bhagyesh27]

All your videos are the only reason i am able to understand the physics and its laws very much. Thanks a lot for such great videos, eagerly waiting for more.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Bhagyesh Purohit, thanks. I am glad to hear that my videos are useful. Many more videos are on their way.

[@theophilus749]

The pre-Newtonian mediaevals come in for a lot of stick from those who are unaware of the relevant history. Here is a quote from Jean Buridan, a 14th century French priest, taken from his _Questions on Aristotle's Metaphysics XII.9._ "...after leaving the arm of the thrower, the projectile would be moved by an impetus given to it by the thrower and would continue to be moved as long as the impetus remained stronger than the resistance, and would be of infinite duration were it not diminished and corrupted by a contrary force resisting it or by something inclining it to a contrary motion." This sounds like Newton and the concept of inertia. In truth, figures like Copernicus, Galileo and Newton did not live in an historical vacuum. They had the knowledge they had at least partly from their forbears.

[@AlchemistOfNirnroot]

Wiki?

[@william41017]

Newton is often quoted saying "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants."

[@shreddedreams]

exactly .

[@mayankify]

Perception of senses are limited. One can say that there can be something more to perceive which our senses can't perceive.

[@TehFingergunz]

Another great video, Eugene. Keep being awesome!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+TehFingergunz, glad you liked my video. Thanks.

[@renatofernandes1086]

Thanks for creating this beautiful video, made my day better.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Glad you liked my video.

[@addul1996]

You're the best :)

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Amer Amodi, thanks. :)

[@GottfriedLeibnizYT]

gotta love physics !

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Gottfried Leibniz, everyone should love physics.

[@alexandrugheorghe5610]

+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky funny thing is that you can't ignore it. The most outstanding example I could give someone was the following: everytime you go to toilet to sh*t, no matter who you are and on what planet, you are only able to do that because of gravity (curvature in space time of the planet on which surface you are standing on), otherwise your bowels wouldn't work correctly this is the example I give to most people because it strikes them so much that everytime they go to restroom they would think of gravity that they are able to do "rest themselves" cheers Eugene! to a better new year :-) thank you for everything!

[@MeteCanKarahasan]

This is wrong. You can excrete upside down in australia, or side ways in asia. The gravitic pull does not tell the rectum to work, it is no plant root.

[@baskarans2509]

Your videos are worth watching! They explain the core concept of Physics. Thankyou very much! I am extremely Extremely grateful to you.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.

[@Dilophi]

Hello @@EugeneKhutoryansky, can you help me with this question? Simultaneously depends of, in which frame of reference you are. And the same goes with lengths. There is no universal Timespace But when we assume, that this universe is simulated, does this mean, there is an universal Timespace. If we stop the simulation or shut it down, then everything in the simulation must be going to halt simultaneously. If we are outside of the Simulation, we could scan the Brains of the people inside the halted silulation and see what they are seeing. One train passenger could see 2 events simultaneously, while a person outside the train sees it non simultaneously. But what is true in the halted simulation? The Train will also appear short from the outside observer and has normal length from the inside observer(passenger). What length does the Administrator of the simulation measure? The Philosophy always search for one absolute truth. But Einstein allows 2 truths. Can be Einstein wrong in a context of a more absolute reality(the world outside the simulation)?

[@superjoker6]

great work guys. keep it coming

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+stefanos kofiras, thanks. Lots more videos are on their way.

[@JohnVKaravitis]

2:30 Here's your "one set of laws" that explains everything: "Shit happens."

[@WiseGuy508]

The singular of "phenomena" is "phenomenon".

[@b43xoit]

Yes and "number of numbers" should replace "amount of numbers".

[@fnalfnal9264]

Wise Guy so what

[@blake301987]

Great Video Eugene. Thanks for making it.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+blake301987, Thanks. Glad you liked it.

[@cenkersengoz1498]

If youtube ever gets caught on fire, your channel should be the first to save :) Wonderful content as usual, bringing some nice philosophical insight to the matter. Thank you very much.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Cenker Şengöz, thanks for the compliment.

[@SciAm14]

How do you make the animations and using which program

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+SciAm14, I make the 3D animations with the program "Poser."

[@SciAm14]

+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky Do you have anyone help you?

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+SciAm14, I make all the animations on my own. The narration is done by a friend of mine, Kira Vincent, who is a professional voice actor.

[@SciAm14]

+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky Ok,thank you for your time answering! Appreciated.

[@somlata295]

It must be hard to make a professional video on your own. I am just speechless about your work, Eugene And the narrating is also amazing👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍🆒🆒

[@fmissark]

I miss the little puppy

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Franklin Missark, you can still see him on my Facebook and Patreon pages.

[@anonymous2609]

Magnificento! Many Thanks! Please keep rollin!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. More videos are on their way.

[@jordanthijssen7721]

This is like an advert for physics. A really good one.

[@chiphill4856]

To say at 2:39 that "we now know that Newton's Theory of Gravity and Maxwells Laws of Electromagnetism are actually incorrect." is misleading at best. It is more accurate to say that these laws have been found to be "incomplete". Indeed, Newton's and Maxwells Laws are used everyday in successful engineering and physics work. These Laws have been refined to more accurate, but they are not incorrect.

[@v3le]

Newton Laws of are totally icorrect. They only gives an good approximation. Good approximation, easy to apply, conceptually intuitive etc. does not mean it's correct. This is not how the universe works (in terms of springs and cannon balls).

[@chiphill4856]

So, you are saying that Force does not equal Mass times Acceleration? Mathematical proof, please!

[@v3le]

@@chiphill4856 more precisely F = m(dv/dt) + v(dm/dt)

[@megugu2155]

@@v3le not hating you or anything but do you know any websites where they explain this? i need stuff to learn about.

[@megugu2155]

@@aduantas dug deeper into calculus and yeah F=ma is wrong... if the mass isn't constant. and yes thank you for that reco i might look into it later.

[@universe12e]

Human atoms and molecules including DNA do follow laws of physics.DNA decides the physical appearance of the creature his expected future if he/she/it live in the same manner that his parents lived once.But if the offspring chose something different then the outcome may be difficult.Example,it is most likely that an offspring of parent having diabeties may likely ot get diabeties but his/her action could defy his/her fate by being more active ,by changing his/her life style.So there is a free will to change his/her fate.This is what we call Fate. and by meditation practice you could apply right knowledge,right actions which helps to change the Fate.So As in ancient Indian texts says that everything's fate is decided but at the same time it is also said that there is free will.One can change his/her/it's fate by right knoweldge,right actions.

[@kwgm8578]

I enjoy the videos. They provide a unique perspective on topics in both classic and modern physics that students will appreciate. My experience as a STEM teacher taught me that students have preferred ways of learning, and my effectiveness depended on my ability to explain course topics in multiple ways. These animated videos can help students challenged with traditional learning tools, like the text book, and the 45 minute lecture. I wish I had these available when I taught, and as a student.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@ElieElKhoury19]

WOW. I found this channel and the content is amazing! Thank you very much the videos are extremely useful!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+ElieElKhoury19, thanks. I am glad that you like my channel, and my videos.

[@TheSandreGuy]

I have a bit of a problem with the saying that "when we study physics we also study the basics of chemistry and biology..." I''m not a biologist so I'm not going to touch on that topic, but as a chemistry student I have to point out that *many* physical phenomenon are actually explained by chemical theory of bonds. For example, the photoelectric effect is a physical phenomenon and can be entirely calculated with a physical mathematical model. But in order to understand why electrons can even be "knocked" and flow so "freely" to begin with, you have to understand the underlying cause of the nature of the metallic bond. Of course at the *most* basic level of the universe such as when you come to the level of quarks you can get away with just pure physics to understand the universe (although even at that level you almost start to enter pure mathematics). My point is that even phenomenon that are entirely physical such as passing electricity through a metallic rod, or stretching a rubber band and releasing it, are only possible due to the laws of chemistry and how matter structures itself. Also, I know it's a technicality but an important one, chemistry is among other things the study of electrons and their innate behavior, and are *elemental particles*, and as such chemistry is just as "basic" as physics. So generally speaking it's a bit misleading to say that by studying physics you also understand the basics of the other sciences. In order to understand the universe you need to understand how all sciences conjoin and give us the full picture.

[@andreadedomenico1479]

Hi, I'm Italian, in our Chemistry books (university books) the first part talks about quantum mechanic, because indeed, phisycs is the base of chemistry and biology :)

[@TheSandreGuy]

+Andrea De Domenico Quantum mechanics is merely the name of a mathematical model used by both physicists and chemists. See quantum chemistry: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chemistry

[@andreadedomenico1479]

+The Sandre Guy thanks :) seems like chemistry and phisycs are the same thing, in this case

[@TheSandreGuy]

Andrea De Domenico They are interconnected. One can't have 90% of the physical phenomena we know without chemical bonds, and in turn they can't exist without some fundamental physical laws.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+The Sandre Guy, the theory of how atoms bind to each other to form chemicals is a part of quantum theory. Therefore, I think this disagreement is simply a matter of semantics, as what you are referring to as chemistry, I would also refer to as physics.

[@wagfinpis]

exquisite composition! I am just amazed by this god-send of a channels productions every time! people have a sense of their connections and relation to the multiverse through the experience of their consiousness. we once looked beyond the mundane and prosaic and to the sky and projected the limits of our observational powers of reason, and again in the age of "M" theory we are able to project the reasoning of our experiences of consiousness beyond the Newtonian and deterministic into the orders of the multiverse. I truly love it.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@wagfinpis]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky it is very honorable how you represent such a distillation of the minds and work of so many greats and unheard of. universities do not teach students to have visions when emulating the work that Tesla produced. there is a very long and profound history of cultivated consiousness preceding significant developments in the sciences and mathematics. this video is much more tasteful than my more color full bias, that comes from my own experience.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments.

[@Pollymichaelis]

instant subscribe. keep up the good work!

[@shubhamsingh7405]

Brilliant! One of my favorite videos.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+shubham singh, thanks. Glad you liked it.

[@wandrespupilo8046]

I'm so happy this channel is finally getting the attention it deserves, this is the best physics content in yt.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@Petrhrabal]

As always. Extremly interesting, revealing and creepy as hell :D Good job!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Glad you enjoyed it.

[@muneebtarae898]

Best physics channel by a clossol margin The way everything is presented just bring another level feeling of physics That was not practiced ever before!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment.

[@HussainAbdi_]

Wow. I think this is the first KZbin video that I have ever liked. Not because I don't like other videos, but because this is the only one that I am proud to like (if that makes sense?). It is really an amazing video and I am looking forward to exploring your channel. Thank you.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+TechnoGeekHA, thanks. I am glad that my video is the first one that you are proud to like, and I hope you also enjoy all my other videos. Thanks.

[@MrBazioto]

AMAZING VIDEOS... CONGRATULATIONS - YOU DO AN EXCELLENT JOB.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment.

[@electronicsinstructor4267]

Your excellent videos are a great resource for teachers ! Thank You.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment about my videos.

[@theuniverse5096]

This is the ONLY channel on KZbin which has videos, with the best animation, best content,best explanation and super super super easy to understand. Thanks a lot! I really appreciate it.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+mehvish mujawar, thanks for that really great compliment. I am glad to hear that you feel that way about my explanations and my animations.

[@theuniverse5096]

+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky +Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky I must say to you, that all of your videos make everything pretty easy to understand,and rather easy to grasp and remember. I had a few advance papers to write and I had almost given up understanding a few concepts, but watching your videos have made it so very easy. And believe it or not, I even tend to watch your videos for fun (my family thinks I'm crazy doing math and physics for fun!) Hats off to you. I hope you keep making videos. And I shall try to support you the best I can! I hope you make more of videos with slightly mysterious physics topics as their mechanism is harder to grasp. But truly Sir/Madam, your videos are THE BEST!!!😊

[@digitaltheory4534]

Your animations crack me up AND help me understand physics. Not many things have that ability! Thank you!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Josh E. You are welcome, and thanks.

[@yashin2068]

This video was absolutely informative and gave me missed parts of the knowledge. I watched this video in couple of hours, because I thought about the material. Since my teenage time, I have thought about these matters, and I would love I watched this video and your other products 10 or 20 years ago... I am someone who have never accepted or been convinced about whatever I was taught. I was thinking and am thinking something similar to these theories and speculations, but at the same time really different. Personally speaking, the truth of everything will be covered forever, but God one day may make us understood about the all or at least about these matters... I can be wrong or right, who knows. At this point, I am perfectly sure, there are something that we even don't know about their questions, forget about the answers! Thank you

[@evrardmusic]

The visuals of these videos makes the observations surreal.

[@aBrightDarknessHD]

I get to watch stuff like this while revising for my Signals and Communications exam. Greatest physics channel ever.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thank for the compliment.

[@expressingmyself684]

Thank you thank you thank you

[@gamestuff8213]

Your videos are classics in the making.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+Game Stuff, thanks for the compliment about my videos.

[@AndresRamirez-uy1jd]

AMAZING ! thank you very much very inspiring

[@imyujun]

Superb video. Had to watch multiple times and other videos that are somewhat supplement.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. Glad you liked my video.

[@imyujun]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky I love your videos and youtube-liked them to support you.

[@MANOJTIWARI-ni8jr]

Thanks for helping people for free, your videos are very insightful.

[@programmatore97]

excellent explanation!! thank you so much for these videos!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+programmatore97, thanks. I am glad you liked it.

[@TheRomichou]

This Channel deserves so much more subscribers! it should be used in schools. we would get tones of new Einstiens, or Hawkings willing to study physics

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+TheRomichou, thanks. Perhaps one day I will have a lot more subscribers than I do right now.

[@infomage]

I loved the video as if it were named "Summary of the history of physics." I think of "philosophy of physics" as being about formalizing (or not) the scientific method and connecting it to epistemology. For example, is there an algorithm or equation that would tell us where there are gaps in our knowledge? Or is there a process that could automatically go from data to a theory? How does math connect to reality? Etc. I think these are active debates, a conclusive answer to which would seriously enhance our understanding of physics. I would love to see your video on those subjects. Thanks for the videos! They are the clearest explanations I've ever found!

[@irvingdelgado6426]

Your videos are amazing! Thanks a lot.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Glad you liked my video. Thanks.