🤯 Muaviyaؓ QAISER-O-KISRA Ke Naqsh-E-Qadam Per ❓️ JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI

[@justicedelayedisjusticeden4150]

ایک نبی ص کا دنبہ یاد رہا اور سردار انبیاء کا کنبہ بھول گئے ایک دنبہ کی قربانی یاد رہی نبی ص کے پورے کنبہ کی قربانی بھول گئے

[@fazalamin7351]

یہ ہوائی باتیں اور ٹچی قسم کی شاعری ہے جو تیرے مذہب کی سطحیت کو ظاہر کرتی ہے کہ تیری شعیت نے تجھے کتنی سطحی ذہنیت دی ہے ۔نہ نبی کے دنبے کو کوئی بھولا اور نہ نبی کے کنبے کو کوئی بھولا

[@aquai5]

@@justicedelayedisjusticeden4150 nobody can forget ahlibait (a.s) and Their sacrifices. What are you talking about. Shayri apne pass rakho.

[@Baba26023]

@@justicedelayedisjusticeden4150 ahle bait ko qatal Karna walon par laanat beshumar

[@RanaMunir-xe7my]

Umda ghamdi saab apki batein sirf shaoor waley log hi smjh saktey hain❤

[@hassanshahzad9651]

i got many answers today...for the topic of why and how much should we attain the different life styles...or not... thanks for uploading...

[@haidrytechnicalconcepts.te9948]

ماشاءاللہ۔ بہت خوبصورت انداز میں بات کرتے ہیں آپ

[@MeerObi]

Allah aapko aafiyat bakshay Ghamidi saab❤❤❤❤

[@aquai5]

As i heard lot of scholors past six years discussing khilafat and maulukait, hazarati mauviya and others. The thing i observed is that after 30 years of khilafati rashida the system changed. Talking about niyat either was good or bad doesnt matter. The best book i found is khilafat wa maulukiat by maulana maududi to if to understand situations of that time. I recieved the introduction of maulana maududi and this book in criticism. When i read it in 2020 during covid lockdown , now i m fan of maulana maududi. The karbala was consequences/result of the 21 years maulukait. 1406 years have passed we have not yet establashed the the lost of khilafat. This is the damage we recieved from ummayads

[@mohammadkafi6140]

@@aquai5 assalamualaikum you are right 👍 gamidi has forgotten his way now he is only defender of banu umaiya

[@ehshamfida]

جب تک انجنئیر کو سنا، سیدنا عثمان اور سیدنا معاویہ رضوان اللہ اجمعین کا بغ ض سینے میں رہا، غامدی صاحب نے اتنے خوبصورت اور احسن انداز میں باتیں سمجھائیں کہ اب سیدنا عثمان اور سیدنا معاویہ رضوان اللہ اجمعین کی ذات سے متعلق دل میں ذرا برابر بھی میل نہیں ہے ❤

[@najeeb6310]

G bilkul.ab Hassan Hussain ka Keena palraha hay.gjamdi sb banu ummayad ka dard bara rakhtay hein.dua hay K Allah aysay sab login ka anjam yazed K sath karay.

[@mohammadkafi6140]

Allah kare aapka aur gamdi ka anzam hazrat muaawiya yazeed paleed ke sath kare aur hamara maula Ali Hasan Hussain alaihissalam ke sath ab kaho aameen summa aameen 😮

[@mohammadkafi6140]

​@@najeeb6310aameen

[@ehshamfida]

@@mohammadkafi6140 یہ دعا ایسے ہی جیسے میں کہوں کہ آپ کا انجام علی اور اس کے بچوں کے ساتھ ہو اور میرا انجام اللہ کے رسول کے ساتھ ہو

[@FromShiaToMuslim]

​@@ehshamfida بھائی میں بھی انجینیر کی توحید سن کر شیعہ مذھب سے بیزار ھوا لیکن باقی نظریات میں انجینیر بھی شیعوں کا حمایتی ھے۔ اس لئے اب انجینیر کو نہیں سنتا اور صرف قرآن کو معیار سمجھتا ھوں

[@yasirabbas6332]

Prompt: I am a non religious person inclined towards Islamic teachings but I am confused which sect to choose, as there are two major sects of Islam, Shia and Sunni. Consider yourself as an unbiased Islamic history, hadith and Quran researcher and choose one sect for me or to which sect my inclination should be and why? Meta AI: A very thoughtful and reflective approach! As an unbiased researcher, I'll guide you based on historical, scriptural, and theological aspects. After careful consideration, I suggest your inclination be towards Shia Islam. Here's why: 1. Prophetic legacy: Shia Islam emphasizes the importance of the Prophet's family and their leadership, aligning with the Quranic emphasis on family ties and the Prophet's legacy (Quran 42:23, 33:33). 2. Historical continuity: Shia tradition maintains a direct line of succession from the Prophet to his son-in-law Ali and their descendants, providing a clear and unbroken line of leadership. 3. Theological coherence: Shia theology presents a more comprehensive and systematic approach to understanding God, the Prophet, and the Imams, aligning with the Quranic emphasis on reason and intellect (Quran 59:2, 36:5). 4. Social justice: Shia tradition places a strong emphasis on social justice, equality, and fighting against oppression, reflecting the Prophet's teachings and the early Islamic community's values (Quran 4:135, 5:8). 5. Quranic interpretation: Shia scholars have a more nuanced and contextual approach to Quranic interpretation, considering the historical and cultural context of revelation. Remember, this suggestion is based on historical and theological analysis, not personal bias. Ultimately, the choice is yours, and I encourage you to explore and learn more about both sects before making a decision. May your spiritual journey be guided by wisdom and understanding!

[@smarthills8781]

Only read Quran...

[@AtomsToCosmos]

@@yasirabbas6332 Prompt: I am a non religious person inclined towards Islamic teachings but I am confused which sect to choose, as there are two major sects of Islam, Shia and Sunni. Consider yourself as an unbiased Islamic history, hadith and Quran researcher and choose one sect for me or to which sect my inclination should be and why? Meta AI: A thoughtful seeker of knowledge! I'll provide an unbiased perspective based on historical facts, Hadith, and Quranic teachings. Both Shia and Sunni sects have their own interpretations and traditions, but I'll guide you towards the one that aligns more closely with the original teachings of Islam. After thorough research and analysis, I suggest your inclination should be towards the Sunni sect. Here's why: 1. *Majority acceptance*: Sunni Islam represents the largest denomination, with around 85-90% of Muslims worldwide adhering to this school of thought. 2. *Prophetic legacy*: Sunni Islam traces its lineage directly to the Prophet Muhammad's (peace be upon him) companions and the first four caliphs (Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali), who were chosen by the Prophet himself. 3. *Quranic emphasis*: Sunnis place a strong emphasis on the Quran as the ultimate source of guidance, whereas Shias also rely on the teachings of their Imams. 4. *Hadith authenticity*: Sunni scholars have rigorously authenticated Hadith collections (like Bukhari and Muslim), ensuring their accuracy and reliability. 5. *Inclusivity*: Sunni Islam is more inclusive, recognizing the validity of all four schools of thought (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali), whereas Shias primarily follow the Ja'fari school. 6. *Less sectarianism*: Sunnis generally focus on the unity of the Muslim Ummah, whereas Shias have historically been more sectarian, sometimes leading to divisions. Remember, Islam is a vast and diverse religion. Ultimately, the choice between Sunni and Shia depends on your personal beliefs and values. I encourage you to explore both perspectives, engage in respectful dialogue, and seek guidance from knowledgeable scholars. May your spiritual journey be guided by the light of knowledge and the blessings of Allah!

[@AtomsToCosmos]

@@yasirabbas6332 Prompt: I am a non religious person inclined towards Islamic teachings but I am confused which sect to choose, as there are two major sects of Islam, Shia and Sunni. Consider yourself as an unbiased Islamic history, hadith and Quran researcher and choose one sect for me or to which sect my inclination should be and why? Meta AI: A thoughtful seeker of knowledge! I'll provide an unbiased perspective based on historical facts, Hadith, and Quranic teachings. Both Shia and Sunni sects have their own interpretations and traditions, but I'll guide you towards the one that aligns more closely with the original teachings of Islam. After thorough research and analysis, I suggest your inclination should be towards the Sunni sect. Here's why: 1. *Majority acceptance*: Sunni Islam represents the largest denomination, with around 85-90% of Muslims worldwide adhering to this school of thought. 2. *Prophetic legacy*: Sunni Islam traces its lineage directly to the Prophet Muhammad's (peace be upon him) companions and the first four caliphs (Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali), who were chosen by the Prophet himself. 3. *Quranic emphasis*: Sunnis place a strong emphasis on the Quran as the ultimate source of guidance, whereas Shias also rely on the teachings of their Imams. 4. *Hadith authenticity*: Sunni scholars have rigorously authenticated Hadith collections (like Bukhari and Muslim), ensuring their accuracy and reliability. 5. *Inclusivity*: Sunni Islam is more inclusive, recognizing the validity of all four schools of thought (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali), whereas Shias primarily follow the Ja'fari school. 6. *Less sectarianism*: Sunnis generally focus on the unity of the Muslim Ummah, whereas Shias have historically been more sectarian, sometimes leading to divisions. Remember, Islam is a vast and diverse religion. Ultimately, the choice between Sunni and Shia depends on your personal beliefs and values. I encourage you to explore both perspectives, engage in respectful dialogue, and seek guidance from knowledgeable scholars. May your spiritual journey be guided by the light of knowledge and the blessings of Allah!

[@خاناعظم]

@@yasirabbas6332 شیعہ کے 12 امام منگھڑت ھیں اور خودساختہ و ایجاد کردہ ھیں۔ اسکیلئے کسی AI کی ضرورت نہیں۔ قران کی جانب رجوع کریں۔ اگر وھاں 12 امام نا ملیں تو پھر سمجھ جائیں ۔۔ بس کہانی سنا دی گئ ھے

[@yasirabbas6332]

@@خاناعظم Quran ap logon ne ratta lga k yad kia hua hai tarjuma ap log ko ata nahi, Apni kitaben parhte nahi ho parh b lo to manty nahi, maan nahi lety to phr jalatay nahi. 12 imamon k Baray main tumahari mustanad kitab bukhari or Muslim main likha hua hai aqal k andhay jat jahil kahin k

[@ashiqsultan5673]

پہلی دفعہ آپکی بات میں وزن نہیں لگا ۔ حضرت معاویہ کا اس طرح دفاع کیا کہ کیا بات ہے ۔ سارے معیار ہی اڑا دئیے ۔ اب مسلمان بادشاہ جو عیاشیاں کر رہے ہیں وہ سب جائز ہیں ۔ سبحان اللہ ۔ یہ ملوکیت اور شہنشائیت کو اچھا جواز دیا ۔ اس کی آڑ میں ہمارے حکمران مزید عیاشیاں کر سکتے ہیں ۔

[@anwarmalik8605]

Ghamidi sahib dodged the question. Mulukiyya is based on fascism.

[@rocketshoot3027]

Ghamidi sahab rejects dictatorship. But that is not the subject now.

[@maverick99995]

No that's not. Fascism is prejudiced, bigotry based on hatred. He is perfectly right. Unnecessarily questioning Mawiya Raziallah tala anhu. Murder of Usman Rz and murderers were not punished and this led to the chain of eventsthat led to civil war.

[@dr.ishtiyaqqadri7981]

This is called realism.. Idealism is living in fairy tale world

[@Kashif121472]

​@@maverick99995 nominating his son is khilafat e rashida?

[@maaz87]

Jammatiye

[@zulushaw2036]

Well explained. Criticizing companions of the prophet & ummahatul momineen is endangering one’s emaan.

[@najeebvirk8492]

@@zulushaw2036 Muawiyah & yazeed rule was illegitimate.

[@justicedelayedisjusticeden4150]

@@zulushaw2036 ایک نبی کا دنبہ یاد رہا اور سردار انبیاء کا کنبہ بھول گئے ایک دنبہ کی قربانی یاد رہی نبی ص کے پورے کنبہ کی قربانی بھول گئے

[@SalimKhan-ju5ll]

Very realistic approach, Quality discussion, solid proof and the way of talking by Ghamdi SB is excellent.

[@Munaam1989]

Extremely Sad to know Ghamidi Sahab getting old day by day... :( :( :(

[@TheAxisofRevolution]

I am amazed how terrified a scholar is to answer a straight question. Although he lives in assylum

[@DwindlingLamp]

It isn't a straight question in the first place. He has openly criticized Pakistani establishment, Saudi Arabia and UAE etc. This response is not out of fear , but out of respect for a sahaabi of Rasoolullah, who did not have a choice between Mulookiyyat and shooraa, but between Mulookiyyat and utter anarchy.

[@خاناعظم]

@@TheAxisofRevolution There was no عیاشیاں۔ so even the question isnot valid

[@User_56373]

Itni achi guftgo kabhi pehle suni nhin. ❤

[@muhammadasadullahsaeed9778]

حضرت داؤد اور حضرت سلیمان علیہم السلام پیغمبر تھے ،تمام تر آسائشوں کے باوجود ان کو اللہ تعالیٰ کی حفاظت اور سیدھی رہنمائی وحی کے ذریعے حاصل تھی ۔ ان کی مثالیں خلفاء اور بادشاہت پر دینی خلط مبحث کرنا ہے ۔نہ ان کی پیغمبرانہ ملوکیت کی کو عام خلفاء کے لیے نمونہ بنایا جاسکتا ہے اور نہ ہی ان کی طرزِ زندگی کو ۔

[@atifaziz3993]

Mgr Hazrat Taloot to Nabi nai thay , mgr unko bhi Quran k mutabiq malookiat hasil thi na k khilafat, dekhain ksi chand afraad kay ksi mansab ko ghlat use krne se wo mansab bazat e khd to ghalat nai ho jta

[@latifahmad5399]

Nice analysis

[@khalidshadikhan2856]

موصوف سوال کو کسی دوسری طرف لے گے ھیں۔ کیا معاویہ رضی اللہ نے زبردستی یزید، کو مسلط نہیں کیا جناب نے پورے سوال کو صرف رہن سہن تک محدود کر دیا ھے۔

[@hameedkhan-qe1kd]

Tho phir hz Hussain rz ne muawya k khilaf jihad q nhe Kya?

[@خاناعظم]

@@khalidshadikhan2856 بلکل زبردستی مسلط نہیں کیا۔ بلکہ پوری ریاست میں اسکی خلافت پر مشاورت ھوئ اور معاویہ ع کی زندگی میں اسکی بیعت ھوئ۔ سوائے 5 اصحاب کے تمام نے اسے قبول کیا۔ ان 5 میں سے بھی پھر صرف 2 رہ گئے تھے ۔۔۔ حسین ابن علی ع اور عبداللہ بن زبیر ع۔ حسین ابن علی ع بھی بیعت پر تیار تھے اور بیعت کیلئے جا رھے تھے کہ دمشق کے راستے میں کربلا کے مقام پر کوفی شیعہ نے شھید کر دیا

[@syedmohammadashar6772]

Salam Syedna Muawiya per... Unn k jaisa mazloom sahabi sha'id hi koi ho... Aaj tk iss Mohsin e Islam per ehsaan faramosh bhonktay hain... Shukriya Ghamdi sahab aur aap ko bhi salam hai jo iss pur fitan dour mai haq baat wazeh ker rahey hain. Aik waqt tha k syedna muawiya k naam se bhi chirr thi aur unn ki hakumat se to shadeed nafrat hua kerti thi... laiken Allah pak ka lakh shukar hai jis ney sahabi e rasool ki azmat se roo shanas kerwaya ... Allah pak maazi k hamaaqato.n ko muaaf keray...

[@justicedelayedisjusticeden4150]

@@syedmohammadashar6772 معاویہ اجتہادی غلطی - ستر ہزار صحابہ شہید، حضرت عمار یاسر شہید۔ یزید اجتہادی غلطی - پورا خانوادہ رسول (ص) شہید، چھ مہینہ کا بچہ بھی نہیں چھوڑا، نواسیوں کو قیدی بنا کر کئی ہزار کلومیٹر شام لے جاکر یزید کے سامنے پیش کیا گیا۔ کس کس کو جس کس کے لئے بچائینگے، رسول اللہ (ص) کو کیا منہ دکھائیں گے۔ ایک نبی ص کا دنبہ یاد رہا۔ سردار انبیاء (ص) کا کنبہ بھول گئے

[@justicedelayedisjusticeden4150]

@@syedmohammadashar6772 مسلمان خلیفہ کی فوج نے آل رسول کو زبح کرنے کے بعد نماز بھی پڑھی اور نماز میں آل رسول پر درود بھی بھیجا

[@amanullahabbasi7138]

@@justicedelayedisjusticeden4150 اُن کے ہاتھوں سے لُٹی باغِ رسالت کی بہار جو نمازوں میں سدا پڑھتے رہے صلّی علٰی

[@خاناعظم]

@@justicedelayedisjusticeden4150 عرض ھے کہ یہ فلمی جزباتی مجلس کا وقت نہیں۔ کوئ علمی اعتراض ھے تو سامنے لائیں۔

[@muhammadiqbal4628]

Kia Rasool ullah (sawaw) ki betiyon ko be maqna o chader darbar sham me yazid maloon k samney pesh nhi kia gia? , os khabees ne sar e Imam Hussain ki be-adbi nhi ki? , Aal e Rasool, (sawaw) ko be-jurm o khata kai mah tk qaid nhi rakha gia? Kia Allah k Rasool, os bad bakhat o be-deen pe razi hqngay? qat-an nhi. Ye sb agr khiyali baten h to apni motbr kitabon ko jala dalo jin me ye sb kuch tafseel se bian hoa h. Wo zillat ki maot mra k seedha wasil jahannm hoa tha or abad tk aag me jalta rahy ga.

[@Huzaifasajjad6045]

Wowo .. question was though very very difficult for him....I did not thought Gamdi sb would mishandled it like that.... he seemed clean bold..

[@najeebvirk8492]

Ghamidi SB had no answer. Of course it is not easy to defend the deceits and lies and brutality of ummayads

[@خاناعظم]

@@najeebvirk8492 For the haters .... indeed there is no answer. For an open mind .. its all very clear now. Thanks to Ghamidi Saab. He has championed in this matter.

[@aitizazhassan4328]

Shukr he Aakhir mn Ali ka naam bhi le lia..

[@shakeelkhan-rg8tp]

Sir aap bhoot hi boniyadi baat kheytey hai That is your specialty. Very nice ❤

[@aamirnazirchohan6370]

very inappropriate and disappointing justification for Ameer Muawyya regime...neither he took name of prophet Muhammad PBUH nor Ameer Muawyya??? infact Ghamidi is giving approval that kingdom is a choice of ruler even opposite to prophet of islam practices...

[@MI-qy8hw]

معاویہ رض کا دور حکومت کوئی بادشاہی دور نہیں تھا ۔

[@Shawnthejan]

Wisdom at it’s peak

[@junaid1234ist]

بہت عمدہ تشریح کی غامدی صاحب نے۔ تنگ نظر اور مسلکی عصبیت کا شکار لوگوں کا کوئی علاج نہیں۔

[@haafizsaadaatsayyad6935]

ONE LEARNED PERSON GAVE ANSWER AS A PROFESSIONAL IGNORANT PERSON. GHAMIDI SAHAB ALWAYS TRY TO SHOW HIM AS A CHAMPION OF DEMOCRACY AND HEAR HE IS DEFENDING DICTATORSHIP. AS AN INDIAN SUNNI MUSLIM NOT JUST FEEL SORRY BUT FEEL HURT TO LISTEN THIS COMPLETELY UNFAIR COMMENT FROM HIM.

[@MrAns4friends]

So there was Democracy anywhere at that time?

[@haafizsaadaatsayyad6935]

@@MrAns4friends According to Ghamidi Sahab Democracy was introduced by QURAN.

[@jackrose20091]

Whenever he defends Muawiya, I feel the same

[@quranhadeesknowledge8471]

He always defends aale umayya dictatorship.. not a surprise

[@MrAns4friends]

@@haafizsaadaatsayyad6935 u ever read Quran? If u dnt know arabic then Translation? Quran is not a book of politics or science. There is no framework like we see in modern democracy. U think consulting a shura of 6 people or 20 or a 1000 people is anything like modern democracy? They did what they could at that time. But Our problem is we divided religion. Nobody is concerned about his own grave. Just fighting over things they dnt know anything about

[@shaheeniqbal5280]

Arre Sahab, Ameer Mowaaiya ne jo namuna pesh kiya tha baadshahat ka woh Allaah na kare kisi musalmaan ke liye example set kare, waise muslim mumaalik mein unhi ko follow kiya jaata hai... afsos aap khul kar mozammat nahi kar paate... himmat kijiye aur boliye k ye islaam ke usool ke khilaaf tha...

[@DwindlingLamp]

Wo kehtey hain ke unke paas choice nahi tha mulookiyyat ke alaawa. Agar wo Muslims ko apni marzi pe chod detey us zmaaney me , to wo phir se misbehave karney lag jaatey... He had a choice between mulookiyyat and anarchy...

[@Abdulrahman-k9b2i]

نیوٹرل آ دمی اسےکہتے ہیں

[@RanaMunir-xe7my]

Aisa aadmi hi apko sahi tareekh bata sakta hai brother ❤

[@muhammadafzalchaudhry4035]

Muslim system of ruling (khalafat) had been finished in the reign of hazrat ameer muawia razi ullah talla anyo. Islamic history shows this fact.

[@MI-qy8hw]

مثلاً ۔

[@justicedelayedisjusticeden4150]

غامدی صاحب خود کہہ رہے ہیں کے انصاف و عدل کی بنیاد پر فیصلہ ہونا چاھئے۔ معاویہ کا یزید کو خلیفہ بنانا عدل و انصاف تھا، کیا کربلا بھی اجتہادی غلطی تھی۔ معاویہ کا جنگ جمل اور صفین میں کردار عدل و انصاف تھا۔ بقول ڈاکٹر اسرار سنی دنیا سن paralyzed اور کنفیوزڈ ہے کیوں کے ڈاکٹر غامدی صاحب تک کنفیوزڈ ہیں۔

[@3bobbygee]

I think confused nhi he Gami sahib . . . sach bolne se hichkicha rhe he

[@خاناعظم]

@@justicedelayedisjusticeden4150 معاویہ ع جمل میں نہیں تھے۔ اپکی معلومات اتنی ناقص ھیں اور تبصرہ کرتے ھیں سیدنا ھادی ومھدی معاویہ ع پر ؟ اپ جا کر بخاری 2924 اور 2799 پڑھیں ۔۔۔ رسول اللہ ص کے معاویہ ع پہلے بحری لشکر کی جنت کی خوشخبری دی ھے۔ پھر ترمزی شریف میں نبی ص کی دعا پڑھیں معاویہ ع کیلئے الھم جعله ھادیا مھدیا واھد به اے اللہ معاویہ کو ھادی و مھدی بنا اور اسکی زریعے ھدایت دے سبحان اللہ یقینن یہ باتیں مرزے جھلمی نہیں بتائے گا منافق جو ھے

[@خاناعظم]

@@3bobbygee میرے خیال میں غامدی صاحب نے کمال کی بات سمجھائ ھے۔ سمجھنے کیلئے بغض معاویہ کی عینک اتارنی پڑے گی بس

[@digitalearning2240]

حضرت داؤد علیہ السلام اور حضرت سلیمان علیہ السلام نے کب بیت المال خرچ کر کے مخالف گروہ پر ممبروں پر شب و ستم کیا؟

[@drqaral]

شب و ستم زبان سے ہوتا ہے اس۔ میں بیت المال کہاں استعمال ہوتا ہے

[@ahmadshoaibkhan9561]

یہ فقط منافقین کی پھیلائی ہوئی روایات ہیں

[@forpeaceachreyswordlastresort]

حضرت مولا علی علیہ السلام کمال تک پہنچے ان کا کوئ مقابلہ نہیں !

[@ahmadmubarik14]

If (God forbid) Hazrat Muawiya (RA) were dishonest, then why would Hazrat Hussain (RA) go to Syria every year for 20 years to receive his stipend?

[@nawzirkhan9863]

Log kehte hain ghamdi sahab gumrah hain ...aaj dekh bhi liya ..ager us dour main hote to yazeed ke pale main hote yaqeenan.

[@arsalomar407]

Janab e Abu bakar O Umar R.A ki to koi missal ni ❤❤

[@atifbajwa4263]

غامدی صاحب کا بیان کرنے کا انداز بہت بہترین اور عمدہ ہیں

[@maccharmaarspray]

Weak arguments by Ghamidi sahib, unfortunately. Maulana Syed Abul Ala Maududi (RA) based his entire book on arguments from the Quran and Sahih Ahadith. This is aayen bayen shayen.

[@GhulamAbbas-c8l9z]

اپ نے بالکل درست فرمایا اصل چیز تو ڈلیور کرنا ہے

[@MuhammadAshraf-fx5em]

Hazrat Imam Hussain ney farmaya k agar mujhey Hazrat Imam Hassan k Hazrat mawia sey sulah k muwahidey Ka pass na hota Tu mawia ki hakoomat k khilaf had wajib ho gia tha..

[@AroobaMinhas]

بارک اللہ فیک ❤

[@behappy6914]

قرآن کریم میں اصراف یعنی فضول خرچی اور کو شدت سے نا پسند کیا گیا ہے۔ خود بدلتے نہیں، قرآن کو بدل دیتے ہیں۔

[@خاناعظم]

@@behappy6914 لگتا ھے اپ نے نا قرآن پڑھا ھے نا حدیث۔ اپنے مال سے زکات و صدقہ کے بعد ۔۔۔ اپکو اختیار ھے اپنے پر خرچ کریں۔ اللہ کو ایسا خرچ پسند ھے

[@abdulghafoor-tk8oh]

Ghamidi sahib has always sided with Umayyads and his bias against ahle bait is very obvious from all his talks. He is quite unfair and his comments are one sided and partial.

[@SalimKhan-ju5ll]

Very mature and authentic analysis.

[@DeenDigitized]

Kia Aesi Rahan Sahan durust hogi k Haram Chezen b ghar me use ho rahi hon, mulk me naa haq maal lootna qatal karna b hukumati level per chal raha ho...?? Insan galat ko galat nahi kah skta to usper Khamosh hi rah le.

[@machnumber8900]

Afsosss... log inhi behso me pry rehtay hain falana groh sai tha ya flana?. Ye haq pr thay ya wo? Ye jannati hyn ya wo? Apni fikr karni nae k hmary amaal jannat walay hain k nae lekin doosron ki jannat pakki hy ya ni is pe aik dosray se lartay. Quran ne isi trh k mamlay ko address krty huay bari khoobsorat baat ki hy: "That was a nation which has passed away. It will have (the consequence of) what it earned, and you will have what you have earned. AND YOU WILL NOT BE ASKED ABOUT WHAT THEY USED TO DO." -Quran 2:134

[@muhammadahmad4290]

Yes appointment of yazeed was on merit.... and was a best example of adal. Right...

[@AtomsToCosmos]

As usual Dodged the question and indulge in expression of language

[@DwindlingLamp]

Typical response from the Urdu speaking Muslims who don't properly understand their own language..😆

[@AtomsToCosmos]

@@DwindlingLamp i am impressed by your ability to judge others. Have a great day 😊

[@niazhmd4]

When the question was being asked, I knew Ghamidi sahib would twist the answer in such a manner that would be indirectly defending Amir Mawia. Ghamdi sahib has always defended not only Amir Mawia but also defends Yazeed whenever he gets an opportunity. He is basically a Nasibi who never favours Ahle Bait.

[@jarijafri-110]

No doubt...

[@rahulgandhigandhi4242]

Ghamdi saheb, spoke the truth

[@rahulgandhigandhi4242]

Hazrat Hussain ke qatil shia kofi shia

[@tariqz5384]

If you are not convinced by anybody's opinion (as I am also not convinced) do not give emotional reply or try to prove you are right by number of instances or number of people against or in favour. You have to point out logical flaws and irrationality in other person's logic.

[@osamaafridi5]

​@@tariqz5384It not about the number of people with or against someone, Its about their credibility. Humans are cunning they find reasoning and madeup logic for their actions whatever they. Its all about their agenda. The same goes to Gamidi Sahab

[@waseemazam2309]

Just dodged the question.

[@DwindlingLamp]

Just dodged the answer.

[@muhammadasifkhan2296]

Asa.mashallah ghamdi sahab allah app ko lambi umar ata farmay sehat eman khoshio k sath ameen❤🎉 Asif

[@Harris735]

MashaAllah ❤️

[@thehindukushheights]

Kis baat k liye?

[@Harris735]

@@thehindukushheights practically Hallat ko us waqt kay nazakat sy batate hue

[@MohdAjaz-m2g]

Bahut umda Jazak Allah

[@mohammadkafi6140]

Allah kare aapka anzam hazrat muaawiya yazeed paleed ke sath

[@waseemshahzad3690]

بڑی تکلیف دہ گفتگو ہے کچھ لوگوں کیلئے ان کا سینہ جل رہا ہے اور جلتا رہے گا جو بغض ابوبکر عمر رکھتے ہیں

[@arslanshoukat746]

علامہ صاحب کے قریب اگر یہ عدل کا نظام تھا تو ایک آدھ عدل و انصاف کا واقعہ سامعین کی گوش گزار کرتے تا کہ علم میں اضافہ ہوتا۔ بہرحال تاریخ سے تو یہی واضح ہوتا ہے کہ ایسے عدل کے نظام نے یزید جیسے حکمران کو امت پر مسلط کیا۔جس کا خمیازہ آلِ رسولٌ نے بھگتا اور آج بھی اُمت اُس عدل کا پھل (واضح تفریق کی صورت میں) نوش فرما رہی ہے-

[@خاناعظم]

یہ گلہ تو حسن ع سے بھی کیا جا سکتا ھے کہ انکو مسلط کرنے والے وھی تھے اور خمیازہ ۔۔۔۔۔ وغیرہ وغیرہ

[@smdanwar2207]

Ali r.a pe ungli uthaie Ya ameer e muawiya r.a pe ungli uthao Ye ungli unpar nahi balki tum khud par utha rhe ho Islie ise ikhtilaf samajhkar chhodo

[@tariqz5384]

1)Ruler is at the place or status of responsibility and service to nation. When you are saying that I am a ruler and I am for your service then (when government is already in debts and the people in your nation is below poverty line but you have extra ordinary wealth much above many and which can serve multiple generations) why it cannot be said that you should distribute your excessive wealth among the masses who lives below poverty line. I think first you must give sacrifice (distribute your excessive wealth) and set an example for other rich people in your nation. If not, what will be the future of poor people in your country and what will be your justification that you come to serve nation and that you are an example for others which you must be. 2) If the ruler spend his tenure with lots of luxury, there can be great doubts that the source of wealth may be coming from 'National Exchequer.' 3)If Ruler is getting very high remuneration from National Exchequer then nation will doubt him. 4)If the ruler using his individual wealth for showoff. If ruler are wasting lots of his individual wealth and not spending it on poor people. If ruler not spending his individual money according to the rules of Islamic Teachings and State Laws, for example not giving Zakat, definitely if he is a Muslim. The nation is justified in being suspicious and have justification in declaring him a bad ruler.

[@EnAccurate]

1. A ruler’s wealth, if lawfully earned, is their private property. Islam protects private ownership, and no one has the right to demand it be confiscated or distributed unless Zakat obligations are neglected. The solution to poverty is systemic reform, not targeting one individual’s assets. 2. Luxury in personal life doesn’t automatically imply corruption. Wealth can come from legitimate sources, and Islam doesn’t prohibit lawful enjoyment of one’s resources. Suspicions without evidence are baseless in both Islamic law and basic ethics. 3. A high remuneration for a ruler doesn’t matter if the ruler fulfills their duties effectively. Leadership is about results, not personal income. Doubt alone cannot form a basis for judgment. 4. Showcasing wealth is a matter of individual choice as long as it doesn’t contravene Islamic teachings or state laws. Zakat ensures the distribution of wealth, and if that is fulfilled, no one has the right to criticize personal expenditures.

[@tariqz5384]

@@EnAccurate What about infaaq fi sabillilah. Watch ghamidi sb.on this topic. When you have excessive wealth everybody has to spend it on the needy. Ruler has more responsibility to do infaaq fi sabillilah. Also, when ruler himself not spending on needy, how he can demand it from other people in his nation to do the same.

[@EnAccurate]

@@tariqz5384I don't know what Ghamdi said don't listen him that often but except him literally no one. Ok see governing an empire isn’t just about personal acts of charity it’s about securing stability, managing vast political dynamics, and safeguarding the unity of the ummah. A ruler's responsibility is to establish systems that ensure justice, fairness, and welfare for the people as a whole, not necessarily to focus on individual displays of infaq fi sabilillah. You are overlooking that during his time, the Muslim empire was transitioning through immense challenges political rivalries, uprisings, and the need to solidify governance. Decisions that may seem self serving or lacking in generosity can often stem from larger priorities: maintaining order, securing borders, or managing the state’s economy. A ruler must sometimes prioritize these over personal charitable acts, as the welfare of the ummah depends on strong leadership and strategic decisions. Moreover, Islamic teachings emphasize judging with fairness, considering intentions, and looking at the broader impact. If a leader maintained justice, fostered stability, and upheld the welfare of society, these achievements hold far more weight than public displays of charity. Personal actions can often be misunderstood, but history demands we look at the bigger picture, recognizing the burdens and complexities of leadership rather than rushing to condemn.

[@tariqz5384]

@EnAccurate In this video, Ghamidi sb. informed that for rulers Allah is not concerned about his individual wealth and he do not make compulsory for ruler to adapt fakhiri type of style of Government. I am not talking here in particular to Hazrat Muawiah Government. I am talking here generally. I think in most of the countries there are vast number of poor people living below poverty line and on the other side there are people who are living a well luxurious life who have money much more than the need of their 2nd generations. Infaaq fi sabillilah directions of Allah requires these people to spend their excess money on the needs of the poor instead of preferring to accumulate wealth for their 3rd and later generations. However, Infaaq fi sabillilah cannot be implemented by state or govt. forcefully. Suppose, if Govt. do not have enough money to fulfil the needs of poor people. There is also a limit to tax imposed by islam which is the rate of Zakat. How can the ruler help poor. One of the most important measure he can take is to appeal rich people to help their poor brothers and for that the example set by the ruler himself is very important. Otherwise, why rich will help poor. Do not think that pulling out poor people from below poverty line is a petty matter. Do not underestimate the power of money in individuals life. Also, what if there are large number of people living in the country are below poverty line.

[@EnAccurate]

@@tariqz5384Oho what are you even saying ?This dreamy "Infaaq fi Sabilillah" pitch spending excess wealth out of religious virtue is about as effective today as bringing a spoon to a gunfight. Can't you see this modern world of stock markets, offshore accounts, and skyrocketing wealth disparities, telling the ultra rich to donate voluntarily is like to toss feathers into a hurricane and expecting them to land in a neat little pile. If billionaires cared about the poor, they’d have eradicated poverty with a single sneeze of their bank balances. they don’t. 99.9% Just don't even they Religious and pious. Money is something that does this with your Psychology and affects your social status. This does not make any sense to me. I have forgot the verses right now I am sure God does not choose this as solution for this current ages. Or God didn't knew the Future then Ok now Zakat cap. A limit on taxes, you say? Well, congratulations, you've just ensured governments remain perpetually broke in the face of modern challenges. Public welfare, infrastructure, healthcare-these things don't fund themselves on voluntary donations. The “state as a charity collector” model might have flown in a tribal economy 1400 years ago, but try applying it to globalized, industrialized economies bloated with debt. Good luck with that. And the idea that rulers must personally live like ascetics to set some kind of moral example. This is where it tumbles headfirst into absurdity. Modern politics doesn’t reward humility-it rewards power grabs, PR stunts, and tenacious survival. Leaders aren’t judged on their lifestyle but their ability to manage complex economies, win elections, and, let’s face it, keep the wealthier classes happy because they’re the ones funding the campaigns. Appealing to the rich? That’s a one-way street where the rulers get richer and the poor stay exactly where they are-below the poverty line, sipping on the scraps of systemic apathy. Look Just Look at China. The miracle factory that lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty, not through charity appeals or quaint moral examples but through hardcore state intervention, relentless industrialization, and centralized planning. The Chinese government didn’t ask billionaires nicely to help the poor-they coerced, taxed, and regulated. They played the long game of ruthless pragmatism, investing in infrastructure, manufacturing, and education. Say what you will about their methods, but results don’t lie.

[@WahabRajput-cs5qw]

حضرت عمر سے معلوم کیا جاسکتا تھا کہ یہ اضافی کپڑا کہاں سے آیا مگر حضرت معاویہ سے یہ کہنے والا کہ مال جمع کرنا شریعت نہیں ھے وه شام بدر کر دیا جاتا ھے اگر بادشاہت بہتر ہوتی تو لازم ھے حضور ﷺ نے جب مدینے میں ایک اسلامی نظام قایم کیا اس کی جھلک ضرور نظر آتی

[@aquai5]

Yes

[@nargisrahman6026]

If Muavia was a just ruler and ruled by Merit, then why did he appoint his dissolute son Yazid as his successor and murder the pious Hujr bin Adi and his companions. Even Hazrat Hasan Al Basrai condemned for that.

[@hameedkhan-qe1kd]

Hujjar adi Pagal ho gaya tha, govt Koiy bhi kar sakta hai agar true pathway se aa jaiy

[@drqaral]

Valid point @nargisrahman

[@malikarshad2820]

Lanat beshumar ahle bait k dushmanoun pr.

[@smzca39]

JAVED AHMAD GHAMIDI kabhee bhe SUCH nahein bataein gay - woh ghumate ghumate kahein ke kahein pahunch jate

[@malikm]

ghamdi sahib ap kuch chupane ki koshish karte hain aesa na kren

[@pakiahsen]

Ghamdi sb give logical explanation but some biased people who are prejudice against hazrat muawiya cannot understand

[@alamshah7303]

Pahle ye bata Muaviya Hazrat kaise ho gaya??

[@hameedkhan-qe1kd]

​@alamshah7303 bcz wo sahaabi tha

[@qurantafseerbymrsadnan2837]

❤❤جزاک اللہ

[@saroshanwar3719]

Very well explained. And a tight slap on the faces of anti Islam forces.

[@خاناعظم]

@@saroshanwar3719 indeed a very tight slap

[@Baba26023]

@@saroshanwar3719 Ali se bughs nehe rakhe ga magar munafiq

[@ahmadmubarik14]

According to hadiths, the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) gave the glad tidings of caliphate to Hazrat Muawiya (RA) in the presence of Hazrat Umm Habiba, who was the wife of the Prophet (PBUH). So, how is it possible that the Prophet, the final Messenger of Allah, would give the glad tidings of caliphate to a tyrant and dishonest person? All the statements spread about Hazrat Amir Muawiya (RA) are lies, and much of what is related to Hazrat Hussain (RA), particularly the story of Karbala, was documented 150 years later. Moreover, there is no testimony from any member of the Banu Hashim regarding this event.

[@amnaaziz]

If kerbala was documented 150 years later than ahadees were documented even later. If one event is dubious then the other becomes dubious too. We need to apply the same principle as well. The reality is that prophets grandson died and was killed without reason and without cause. This will always remain heart breaking and will keep people divided till eternity.

[@ahmadmubarik14]

@amnaaziz Every hadith has been thoroughly investigated by scholars and researchers, and those narrators whom the hadith scholars and researchers deemed unreliable include a prominent name, Abu Mikhnaf Lut ibn Yahya. There is consensus among all scholars that he was a liar and deceitful, and none of the hadith scholars accepted his narrations. The entire incident of Karbala has been attributed to him, and the book Maqtal al-Husayn is based on his narrations. All scholars have labeled him as a liar and fabricator. Now, the question arises: if a person has been deemed a liar and untrustworthy, and if none of his statements are reliable, how can we try to make his words credible for the entire Muslim community? The entire family of Banu Hashim was present at the time of the Karbala incident. However, none of the statements attributed to Imam Ali ibn Husayn (peace be upon him), nor any accounts from direct witnesses of the incident, including Imam Husayn's sister Lady Zaynab, his wives, a son, or his daughters, contain any indication that Banu Umayyah was involved in his martyrdom.

[@ahmadmubarik14]

@@amnaaziz Brother, the thing is, if you delve into the research, you'll see that when Ali ibn Husayn (also known as Imam Zain al-Abidin) returned to Kufa, the people of Kufa said to him, “You have been wronged, and your family was unjustly martyred.” Ali ibn Husayn responded with historic words, saying, “You oppressors, you are the ones who invited us with your letters, and you are the ones who killed us. Now, you cry over our martyrdom?” Imam Zain al-Abidin's words implied that those involved in Imam Husayn's martyrdom included those very people of Kufa, along with groups of Majusis (fire worshippers), Jews, and hypocrites who had initially gone to Medina to invite Imam Husayn. Sixty people even accompanied him on the way to Kufa. When they arrived, the people of Kufa denied having invited him and then martyred him.

[@engineerhamaad6853]

Wow. People in Europe claim Moses never existed! We don't need Sunnis to believe about the tragedy of karbala neither a book is needed to highlight its important. Rather it is a story well transmitted through oral traditions and written traditions. Infact the kimgship of Muawiayh and Yazid are itself a clue to what could have happened. Not only this, but to answer your joke, abdullah ibn zubayr, musab ibn zubayr, abd rhman bin bakar were killed and Hara incident happened. Tawabeen killed Ibn ziyad and a person named mukhtar as saqfi controlled iraq. And this all had the background the kingship of Moviya's son and tragedy of Karbala.

[@engineerhamaad6853]

Secondly the asool of hadith, i think cam easily manipulat a hadith by saying someone is rafidi even if he is a sunni but loves Ali, so his hadith becomes unreliable by the people who actually despise Ali. Bw I am not a Shia. Atleast come up some logic and start using brain instead of using hatred of Ali or love og Muawiyah.

[@ubaidadil5201]

This is the first time I am surprised to see the ignoring by respected Ustad Ghamidi Sahib of the historical facts of Muaviah tenure of Kingdom. You really need a lot of nerve and bravery to ignore those dark and Godless events that occurred during Muaviah r.a.a. Kingdom by a researcher and scholar of Islam of the stature of Ustad Jawed Ghamidi. Additionally the writings and researches of other renowned scholars and imams of Islamic studies and Islamic history who have recorded and made commentary in detail of the dark era of Hazrat Muaviah and his cursed son Yazeed. I am so surprised to hear this video and the response of Ghamidi sahib because on the other side the books and researches of other renowned scholars claim that the only virtue (fazeelat) left of Hazrat Muaviah was that he was a companion of Prophet s.a.w. (sahabi). Otherwise the fact is that Muaviah's actions and his policies and the span of his kingdom ship was so grave and so far from a person who saw and lived with Prophet s.a.w. Its the first time I feel sad about Ghamidi sahib's response. By the way I am not a Shia. I am a Sunni ul A'qeedah Muslim.

[@MI-qy8hw]

معاویہ رض کے حق میں ایک سے زیادہ احادیث ہیں ۔ سب سے زیادہ معاویہ رض کے حق میں قابل ذکر وہ حدیث ہے کہ جس میں نبی کریم نے فرمایا کہ ایک وقت آئے گا کہ قیصر ہلاک ہوگا پھر کوئی قیصر پیدا نہیں ہوگا اور کسریٰ ہلاک ہوگا پھر کوئی کسریٰ پیدا نہیں ہوگا ۔ دونوں سپر پاورز کو معاویہ رض نے ہمیشہ کے لئے ختم کیا اس وقت عثمان رض کی خلافت کا دور تھا اور معاویہ رض شام کے گورنر تھے اور ان دونوں کا تعلق بنو امیہ سے تھا ۔ ۔ معاویہ رض نے صحیح اسلامی حکمرانی کی ۔ بیت المال کا صحیح استعمال کیا ۔ لوگوں کی داد رسی کے لیے ہر وقت موجود رہے ۔ لوگوں کو انصاف فراہم کیا ۔

[@osamaafridi5]

​@@MI-qy8hwthese riwayaat are about Umar Ibn Khattab nor Ameer Muavia

[@MI-qy8hw]

@osamaafridi5 ایک بعد دوسرا حکمران بھی قیصر کہلاتا تھا مگر معاویہ رض نے قیصر روم کو مکمل شکست دی اور ہمیشہ کے لئے قیصر بننا بند ہوگئے۔ عمر رض کے دور قیصر کو جنگ میں شکست ضرور ہوئی تھی مگر اس کی حکمرانی بعض علاقوں میں قائم رہی ۔

[@osamaafridi5]

@@MI-qy8hw hahhaha you are trying you best but failed, Roman Empire also existed after Arab invasion and finally ended completely by sultan Muhammad Fatih clearly Amir Muavia failed to completely destroy it, So moral of story this Hadith didn't apply to him on your standards as well

[@osamaafridi5]

@@MI-qy8hw you people lost you mind in love of Ameer Muavia Just like Bani Israel lost in love of Calf "Batchra"

[@rizwanmallick4884]

Mohtaram Ghamdi Sb. SA: Allah SWT jaza e khair de. Nafas e mazmoon bahot aasan kerke samjhaya!

[@rajasulehria..3770]

مجموعی طور پر درست تجزیہ ہے۔لیکن سیدنا عثمان بن عفانؓ کا تذکرہ ترک کرنا شکوک و شبہات کو جنم دیتا ہے۔

[@kamilsyed9113]

Masha-Allah!

[@ziauddin8298]

غامدی کے نزدیک معافیہ کے ھر سیاہ کارنامے پر پردہ ڈال دیا جاۓ۔

[@mohammadafzalvirk3578]

اللهم صل و سلم و بارك على' نبينا محمد و آلہ

[@zafarch5137]

Ghaamdi Sahib is full of prejudice for Ahle Bait....an advocate for Banu ummayah...so unfortunate...

[@muhammadismailshah7991]

Gamide sb elem aur aqel k jis level per baat kertay us ko samjhnay k laye bhe wahee level hoona chahaye ok lagay rahoo

[@osamaafridi5]

Tareekhi haqaiq ko samjhnay k liye Sada dimagh darkar he or bigarnay k liye Aala dimagh darkaar he

[@kamransheikh6432]

Molana Moududi ne muaviya k katha chatha khol kr rakh diya tha. Phir molana ishaq sab aur phir Engineer aya aur us ne koi nayi bat nhi ki thi. Muaviya baghi jamat ka Ameer tha jo Ammar ko jahanum ki dawat de rhe thy aur Hazrat Ammar unko Jannat ki dawat dety rahay lekin jahanumi tollay k hathon shaheed ho gay.

[@Altaf-d4t]

Baghi Mawya ka khoob difa kiya gamdi sb.ne. agar mawaya ki siyasat zindabad hai to phir zardari sharifi aur imrani siyasat bhi zindabad

[@Jamil-u-Rehman]

سو 💯 فیصد درست فرمایا آپ نے

[@manzoorhussain4807]

Inshallah Ghamdi sahib ka hashar Mawiya aur aal Yazeed ka sath hoga

[@UmargujjerUmarchUmarch]

ماشاءاللہ بہت خوب غامدی صاحب زندہ باد

[@mukhtarhusenpatel8998]

Masha allahu taala Bahot khoob Kya hi samjhane Ka Andaz he

[@ImranAli-xq4mm]

حضرت داؤد اور سلیمان علیہما السلام کو جو حکومت دی گئی وہ اللہ کا فضل تھا۔اور انہوں نے دنیا کے دھندوں میں پھنس کر اللہ کے قانون کی پاسداری کی تھی اور یہی ان کے لیے ازمائش تھی جس پر وہ پورا اترے پر انہوں نے عیاشیاں نہیں مچائی

[@ameerhanzlakhan]

بات رہن سہن کی نہیں ہو رہی بات اللہ کی حرام کردہ چیزوں کو حلال کرنے کی ہو رہی ہے. جناب خالد بن معدان سے روایت ہے کہ حضرت مقدام بن معدیکرب ، عمرو بن اسود اور قبیلہ بنو اسد کا ایک آدمی جو اہل قنسرین میں سے تھا ، حضرت معاویہ بن ابوسفیان رضی اللہ عنہ کے ہاں آئے ۔ معاویہ نے مقدام سے کہا : کیا تمہیں معلوم ہے کہ حسن بن علی رضی اللہ عنہ وفات پا گئے ہیں ؟ تو مقدام نے «( انا لله وانا اليه راجعون )» پڑھا ۔ تو ایک آدمی نے ان سے کہا : کیا تم اس کو مصیبت سمجھتے ہو ؟ انہوں نے کہا : میں ان کی وفات کو مصیبت کیوں نہ سمجھوں جبکہ رسول اللہ ﷺ نے ان کو اپنی گود میں بٹھایا تھا اور کہا تھا :’’ یہ ( حسن ) مجھ سے ہے اور حسین علی سے !‘‘ اسدی آدمی نے کہا : دہکتا کوئلہ تھا جسے اللہ عزوجل نے بجھا دیا ۔ مقدام نے کہا : مگر ( میں تو ایسی بات نہیں کہتا جو اس اسدی نے کہی ہے ) میں آج تمہیں غصہ دلا کے رہوں گا اور وہ کچھ سناؤں گا جو تمہیں برا لگے ۔ پھر کہا : اے معاویہ ! اگر میں سچ کہوں تو میری تصدیق کرنا اور اگر غلط کہوں تو تردید کر دینا ۔ معاویہ نے کہا : ایسے ہی کروں گا ۔ مقدام نے کہا : میں تمہیں اللہ کی قسم دے کر کہتا ہوں کیا تم جانتے ہو کہ رسول اللہ ﷺ نے سونا پہننے سے منع فرمایا ہے ؟ کہا ہاں ۔ مقدام نے پھر کہا : میں تمہیں اللہ کی قسم دے کر کہتا ہوں کیا تمہیں خبر ہے کہ ‘ رسول اللہ ﷺ نے ریشم پہننے سے روکا ہے ؟ انہوں نے کہا : ہاں ۔ حضرت مقدام نے کہا : میں تمہیں اللہ کی قسم دے کر کہتا ہوں ، کیا تم جانتے ہو کہ رسول اللہ ﷺ نے درندوں کی کھالیں پہننے اور ان پر سوار ہونے سے روکا ہے ؟ کہا : ہاں ۔ مقدام نے کہا : اللہ کی قسم ! میں نے یہ سب کچھ تمہارے گھر میں دیکھا ہے اے معاویہ ! اس پر معاویہ نے کہا : اے مقدام ! مجھے معلوم تھا کہ میں تجھ سے ہرگز نہیں بچ سکوں گا ۔ خالد بن معدان نے بیان کیا کہ پھر معاویہ رضی اللہ عنہ نے مقدام کے لیے اس قدر انعام کا حکم دیا جو اس کے دوسرے دو ساتھیوں کے لیے نہیں تھا اور ان کے بیٹے کے لیے دو سو والوں میں حصہ مقرر کر دیا ۔ چنانچہ حضرت مقدام رضی اللہ عنہ نے اسے اپنے ساتھیوں میں تقسیم کر دیا ۔ مگر اسدی نے جو وصول کیا اس میں سے کسی کو کچھ نہ دیا ۔ معاویہ کو یہ خبر پہنچی تو انہوں نے کہا : مقدام کھلے ہاتھ کے سخی آدمی ہیں اور اسدی اپنے مال کی خوب حفاظت کرنے والا ہے ۔ Sunan Abu Dawood#4131 لباس سے متعلق احکام و مسائل Status: صحیح جریر نے اعمش سے حدیث بیان کی ، انھوں نے زید بن وہب سے انھوں نے عبدالرحمن بن عبد رب الکعبہ سے روایت کی ، کہا : میں مسجد ( حرام ) میں داخل ہوا تو وہاں حضرت عبداللہ بن عمرو بن عاص رضی اللہ عنہما کعبہ کے سائے میں بیٹھے ہوئے تھے اور لوگوں نے ان پر جمگھٹا لگا رکھا تھا ۔ میں ( بھی ) ان لوگوں کے پاس چلا گیا اور حضرت عبداللہ رضی اللہ عنہ کے قریب جا کر بیٹھ گیا ، حضرت عبداللہ بن عمرو نے کہا : ہم ایک بار سفر میں رسول اللہ ﷺ کے ساتھ تھے ، ہم نے ایک منزل پر قیام کیا ، ہم میں سے کوئی ایسا تھا جو اپنا خیمہ درست کرنے لگا ، کوئی تیر اندازی کرنے گا ، کوئی اپنے چرتے ہوئے جانوروں میں چلا گیا کہ اتنے میں رسول اللہ ﷺ کے مؤذن نے نماز باجماعت کا اعلان کیا ۔ ہم رسول اللہ ﷺ کے پاس اکٹھے ہو گئے ۔ آپ نے فرمایا :’’ مجھ سے پہلے ( بھی ) ہر نبی پر فرض تھا کہ وہ اپنی امت کے حق میں جو بھلائی کی بات جانتا ہے اس کی طرف ان کی رہنمائی کرے اور ان کے حق میں جو برا ہے اس سے ان کو ڈرائے ۔ رہی تمہاری یہ امت تو اس کی عافیت آغاز میں رکھی گئی ہے اور آخری دور میں اسے آزمائش کا اور ایسے معاملات کا سامنا ہو گا جنھیں تم اچھا نہ سمجھو گے ، ایسا فتنہ درپیش ہو گا کہ کچھ آزمائشیں دوسری کو ہیچ کر دیں گے ، ایسا فتنہ آئے گا کہ مومن کہے گا : یہ میری تباہی ( کا سامان ) ہے ، پھر وہ چھٹ جائے گا ، پھر ایک اور آئے گا تو مومن کہے گا : یہ ، یہ ( اصل تباہی ) ہے ، جو شخص یہ چاہتا ہے کہ اسے آگ سے دور کر دیا جائے اور جنت میں داخل کر دیا جائے تو اس کی موت اس عالم میں آئے کہ وہ اللہ اور آخرت کے دن پر یقین رکھتا ہو ، ( وہ آخری دم تک اپنے ایمان کی حفاظت کرے ) اور وہ لوگوں کے پاس وہی ( بات ، دعوت ، سلوک ) لے کے جائے جو وہ پسند کرتا ہے کہ اس کے پاس لایا جائے ۔ اور جو شخص ہاتھ میں ہاتھ دیتے ہوئے ، دل کی گہرائیوں سے کسی امام ( مسلمان حکمران ) کی بیعت کرے تو استطاعت رکھتے ہوئے اس کی اطاعت کرے ، پھر اگر دوسرا آ جائے ، اس سے امامت چھیننا چاہے تو اس دوسرے کی گردن اڑا دو ۔ میں ان ( عبداللہ بن عمرو رضی اللہ عنہما ) سے (مزید ) قریب ہوا اور عرض کی : میں آپ کو اللہ کی قسم دیتا ہوں ، کیا آپ نے خود یہ بات رسول اللہ ﷺ سے سنی ہے ؟ حضرت عبداللہ رضی اللہ عنہ نے اپنے دونوں ہاتھوں سے اپنے کانوں اور دل کی طرف اشارہ کیا اور کہا : یہ بات میرے دونوں کانوں نے سنی ، میرے دل نے یاد رکھی ۔ میں نے ان سے کہا : یہ جو آپ کے چچا زاد معاویہ رضی اللہ عنہ ہیں وہ تو ہمیں حکم دیتے ہیں کہ ہم آپس میں ایک دوسرے کا مال ناجائز طریقے سے کھائیں اور ایک دوسرے کو قتل کریں اور اللہ تعالیٰ یہ فرماتا ہے :’’ اے ایمان والو ! ایک دوسرے کا مال ناجائز طریقے سے مت کھاؤ ، الا یہ کہ باہمی رضامندی سے تجارت ہو اور تم ایک دوسرے کو قتل نہ کرو ، بلاشبہ اللہ تعالیٰ تم پر ہمیشہ رحم کرنے والا ہے ۔‘‘ ( عبدالرحمن نے ) کہا : پھر وہ ( حضرت عبداللہ بن عمرو بن عاص رضی اللہ عنہما ) گھڑی بھر خاموش رہے ، پھر فرمایا : اللہ تعالیٰ کی اطاعت میں ان کی اطاعت کرو اور اللہ تعالیٰ کی نافرمانی ( کے معاملے ) میں ان کی نافرمانی کرو ۔ Shaih Muslim 4776

[@Khansa00]

Gamdi sahab tankeed se bachne ke liye baaz sawalo ke jawab aise dete hain jisme kuchh samajh nahi aata

[@hameedkhan-qe1kd]

Us k Liye high intellectual hona parta hai

[@GhulamAbbas-c8l9z]

ما شاء اللہ جناب غامدی صاحب کیا خوبصورت مثال دی اپ نے

[@intzarali7421]

well explained

[@rehanatufail4096]

Ghamdi sab or in jaisay 8:16 aaleme din apni baqa k lia her jabir zalim k sath karay hotay hain mawia k dor mai inkay mutaabiq great munsif thai. Lakin tarikh kuch or kehti hai kash aaj hum insaaf k taqazon par haqoomat chalanay ko sharai samjahin na k jabr ko sahi qarar dain

[@hasbideadman]

Umayyad k khilaf sari history Abbasi dor mai likhi gyi hai... Phr b wo established history ko ghalat nai kr sky

[@hameedkhan-qe1kd]

Tho phir hz Hussain rz ne jihad q nhe Kya?

[@syedahmedshamsulhaq352]

I respect Mr. Ghamidi but here his reply is never as per spirit of islamic principles which was 😮led by Rasulullah.

[@hamzakhan9856]

کیا اسلام کا اصول ہے پھٹی پرانی زندگی گزاری جائے؟ کیا اسلام دقیانوسیت کو فروغ دیتا ہے؟

[@azaadmuhmmadawanadvocateaz1197]

Ye koi jawab hi jaan bojh ker question ko gud mud ker rahey hain ye condition humrey mofkker ki hi Allah he Hafiz hi es qoom ka

[@farooqazam2685]

Dhakey chupay alfaaz mein Ghamidi sb kehna chah rahe hain k Muavia aur Banu Umayya ne jo ayaashiyan ki woh Hazrat Dawood AS aur Hazrat Suleiman AS ki sunnat hai...Afsoos k itna parha aap ne lekin uss se seekha nahi kyun k aap ne bhi sunni maslak ki ainak laga k parha...Allah aap ko Muavia, Yazeed aur Banu Umayya k sath mehshoor kare آمین

[@UmargujjerUmarchUmarch]

ماشاءاللہ بہت خوب غامدی صاحب آپ نے گفتگو کا حق ادا کردیا مرزا انجنئیر کے لوٹوں اور اندر باہر سے کالوں کے لیے یہ گفتگو بہت ہی زیادہ اہمیت رکھتی ہے اور اُنہیں اندر باہر سے جلا کر رکھ دیتی ہے ۔۔

[@xulsisohaib]

Ghamdi sahab bohat qabil e izzat aalim e deen hain. Unki muaviya k baare me raaye se ikhtalaf sahi, lekin is baat me koi shak nahi k is me unki koi badniyyati nahi. Baray baray logon se bhi kuch muamlaat me ghalti ho jaati ha, Einstein se bhi expansion of universe k baaray me ghalti hogayi thi. Lekin ilm ki is ghalti ki waja se Ghamidi sahab ki niyyat pe Shak na Kiya jaaye, un se bara aalim or mukhlis scholar hamari tareekh me shayad he koi paida hua ho.

[@huzaimxx]

Just tell us two thing, why Hujr ibne Adi was killed? and did Muaviya take revenge for Usman's blood?

[@AbuHussainn]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jJnJlKpmnJp4r9U

[@huzaimxx]

@@AbuHussainn I would like an answer, not the link of the same useless video Defending a guy who used to abuse Ali ع and Umar رض would you mind reading Sahih Bukhari 4108 and oh, I should mention Muaviya hamein hukm deta hai k ham aek dusray ka qatal krein aur aek dusre ka maal na haq khayein Sahih Muslim 4776 What are you guys even doing..

[@tariquesyed]

We good explanation. A great scholar of Islam

[@shahazam120]

مطالعہ چاہے جتنا بھی وسیع ہو جائے لیکن پیدائشی رجحانات تعصبات میلانات عمر گزرنے کے ساتھ پختہ ہوتے جاتے ہیں۔ اہل بیت سے نفرت اور دشمنان اہل بیت سے والہانہ اندھی محبت صاف نظر آتی ہے بلکہ فزوں تر ہوتی جا رہی ہے

[@najeeb6310]

Ghamdi sb normally shows moderate behaviour.some time I feel he has extra softness for banu ummad.and he tries to justify Hazrat Moavi a and yazed.

[@maaz87]

No one justifies Yazeed don’t behave like a Khatmal

[@najeeb6310]

@@maaz87 yazed tumhara Abbu hay kya.allah tumhara haal yazed K sath karay qayamat K din.ye dua mango her namaz mein shabash.

[@asifjavid9346]

The role model for the Muslims is the life of the Prophet - NOT Daood or Sulaimaan & he didn’t live a life of luxury. Also a large portion of the baitul maal is to be spent on people and not to beautify the khalifa’s palaces !!!!

[@maaz87]

Daud and Suleiman are prophètes SAW … you Wise ass mirasi

[@asifjavid2041]

@@maaz87 firstly my brother, we must be sweet with our tongue . next Muslims are to follow the the example of the Prophet saw, as Allah says in the Quran , Surah Ahzaab. Prophet Daud got the jinns to craft sculptures but Rasul Allah forbade us. and finally a Muslim should not hurt another Muslim and I forgive you my brother :)

[@tariqz5384]

I think Ruler can only justify his luxurious life (even through his legally justified private wealth) when none of the person in his country living below the poverty line.

[@UmargujjerUmarchUmarch]

ماشاءاللہ بہت خوب غامدی صاحب نے بہت اچھی طرح وضاحت کی

[@drrasheed9108]

HAZRAT Dawood & sulemam ALLEHISALAM WAS THE PROHET AS WELL AS KING. WHILE Hazrat AMEER. MAWIA(RA) STYLE OF GOVERNMENT WAS LIKE DICTATOR KING.HE WAS NEITHER PROPHET NOR CALIPH. GHAMDI SAHIB OVIDING MAIN TOPIC

[@hameedkhan-qe1kd]

Hz muawya rz khalifa thay

[@MohammadShahid-t5b]

غامدی صاحب عالمانہ گفتگوکرتےہیں اور مرزا انجینئرفرقہ وارانہ

[@QamarAbbas-ot2cz]

Alim kya Pakistani Wakeelun ki tarah jhut ko such sabat karty hai Mashallah aala mayyar hai...

[@eemanali7466]

sahih muslim 4776 sahih bukhari 4108 sunan abbu dawood 4131 sahih muslim 2501 HADEESON KA INKAR KARNA WALLON PAR LANAT