What does China’s J-35A stealth fighter mean for US air power over Taiwan?

[@sdfopsdmsdofjmp7863]

I don't care about how good it is, we have no way to know that yet. The J-35A is absolutely fucking beautiful. It has smoother lines and more rounded wing tips almost like the F-22. The 2 engines and wide set vertical stabilizers, along with the overall flatter profile also looks better than a single engine I think. The HUD is also good from an aesthetics standpoint in my opinion. It's almost as pretty as the F-22.

[@imfromisrael489]

it looks exactly the same on the front

[@looinrims]

It does look very nice but I think the inlets ruin the look from the front

[@chanisaac5167]

@@looinrims well its DSI is best kinda inlet

[@阿斯顿法国红酒快-t9l]

People call F35 fat but J35 beautiful?😂

[@sdfopsdmsdofjmp7863]

@@imfromisrael489 Not really. The J-35 is a fair bit pointier and the front isn't as "tall". The aircraft just isn't as fat. That is not to say the F-35 is worse. It's almost certainly better, but I don't think it looks all that similar to the J-35 from any aspect.

[@alguemsemideiadenome6887]

I find it funny how US military has already pronouced itself saying in MULTIPLE ocasions saying things like... "We dont know what the Chinese and Russians aircraft are capable of... it is smart to not make assumptions... and nit underestimate these aircrafts..." Meanwhile... random guys in the internet : "its so trash it will not even fly!, its worse then a F4! Its a joke of a aircraft!" Like... out of nowhere there appeared lots of especialists in the area uhh?

[@Eagl3xStrik3]

There's a always a difference between what you publicly vs Privately lol I promise you, no one privately is saying omg China is so advanced and will defeat anyone it comes in contact with!

[@alguemsemideiadenome6887]

@Eagl3xStrik3 i know dude... i am not saying that it is better than US or something like that... what i am saying is that everyone keeps saying like those aircrafts are trash... even though they are not... they probably are worse the the F35 or the F22... but that doesnt mean its a bad aircraft...

[@poorsvids4738]

Sounds like the Romans who saw themselves as the most advanced people on the world and looked down on everyone else. It did not end well for them.

[@xiaochaoo]

@@Eagl3xStrik3 I think it's the other way round or you would have lost your job as a paid shill. Cope harder, generic alphabet account.

[@晚星星]

我们和你们还有很大差距，飞机方面至少20年，经济就更不用说了​@@alguemsemideiadenome6887

[@kevinc1200]

What's most interesting at this stage is that J35A has a long enough internal bay to house the very long PL-15, which will give the Chinese a lot more room to improve air to air missile range.

[@johng8837]

Key point here- with a far shorter operational range needed for Taiwan- China is doubling down on this advantage and able to focus on better tradeoffs. In the context of a lightning strike on Taiwan, all China has to do is to hold the US at a distance

[@2goober4u]

@@kevinc1200 I wonder what they had to sacrifice in order to increase the size of the payload bay?

[@jielinzhou1442]

@@johng8837 all these advanced weapons are prepared for US, to make sure US act like a peaceful country in this region.

[@bobsmith3983]

@@johng8837 Holding the USA at a distance is easy with the DF-17, DF-21, DF-26, DF-27 and YJ-21 ASBMs. The carrier launched F-35Cs don't have the range to to reach Taiwan when out of the Chinese ASBM range. So the US carriers would be impotent and cannot help ROC. US carriers might as well stay in port.

[@johng8837]

@@bobsmith3983 Unless the Japanese fully commit to rearmement-

[@Sid_Okay]

Wait! They call it J-35? 😂😂😂 Do you think they are just trolling us at this point?😂😂😂

[@cccc-zz8cy]

I thought same thing 😂

[@rainlord137]

Chinese humor

[@djinn666]

I think it is so that non military folk can easily talk about the balance of power. One J35 is equivalent to one F35.

[@LetianLi]

Tbh as a Chinese it had me baffled as well. It’s not like ppl order these from Amazon and be like oops I just made some typos and ordered some J-35s when I wanted some good old F-35s. DAMN IT!

[@Gongolongo]

Used to be called J-31 too.

[@BoluwatifeOlusola-zg4up]

Crazy how they decided to name it J-35 just like F-35 lmao

[@Jacksonlgf]

j 20=22🤣🤣🤣

[@RichardsMiscCorner]

or here's a thought, they don't care and just named their planes whatever they want? Could be that China really doesn't give a rats ass about the US. The world doesn't revolve around the US military.

[@lieutsatan4257]

J represents Jian(歼) , means kill. Its mission is to kill F35.

[@xiaochaoo]

@@BoluwatifeOlusola-zg4up J stands for attack in Chinese. Now look at the name again. Now you know why.

[@tylerparker4010]

​@RichardsMiscCorner I mean it's straight up ignorant to claim China doesn't give a rats ass about the US. It's probable that the US receives more of the Chinese government's attention than any other nation on earth.

[@EdwarkDiyaz]

这个频道很多人没有意识到解放军不像美军一样拥有与中东阿富汗牧羊人作战的丰富经验，那些牧羊人拥有强大的卫星系统，强大的军工能力，并且拥有核武器，战斗机，即便如此强大的对手依旧无法战胜美军，解放军从来没有与阿富汗中东牧羊人作战过，所以解放军实战经验不如美军，更重要的一点解放军不像美军一样拥有多种性别，解放军距离美军的差距非常远，美国是世界唯一超级大国，唯一有可能对美国构成挑战的国家是印度或者是韩国，因为印度韩国拥有出色的军工能力优越的文化强大的自由民主价值观

[@BoundlessVoyager]

战忽局的好同志啊

[@LCMiuMiu]

三哥大喜

[@mehmed13]

​@@Warspite-1915 do you really compare iraq to china ?!

[@segelHoch]

好好好，这么玩是吧

[@hellojack623]

@@EdwarkDiyaz As a Chinese I can't agree more. [狗头.jpg]

[@KabukeeJo]

Funny how YT deletes my comments but doesnt delete the pornbots at the bottom.

[@WorkingProleinc]

Same here

[@derek8564]

they want the porn bots I think. Increasing "Engagement" on their platform to sell more to advertisers.

[@WorkingProleinc]

@@derek8564 Just i get allways adds from some pimp on Pedo/Zio Tube,who Promotes OF. Truly Westerner Values on Display.

[@dougkennedy4906]

They are acting as editors. Which is unlawful.

[@biddyboy1570]

Hello. Me love u long time.

[@shyang5442]

Even with such poor equipment in the Korean War, China didn't lose. It's strange if can't win now.

[@恶魔巫师-y4f]

因为决定战争走向的永远是人民，社会组织力，1949年共产党统一中国从新组织起来的新中国变得有凝聚力焕发生机再度复兴，这就是为什么中国不惧美国核威胁参与朝鲜战争的原因，并且成功将美军反推到38线，当时的美国是世界第一大工业国，而中国国内经历两次世界大战内战一片废墟，但是中国依旧获胜，朝鲜战争美国为了寻找失败的借口声称中国是因为人海战术获胜，然而实际上中国志愿军的数量并没有比联合国军更多

[@4411825]

China 🇨🇳 most definitely will defeat imperialism 🫡

[@MaddoScientisto-fb3kb]

@@恶魔巫师-y4f peak strength of UN forces: 970 000 men, DPRK+China: 1 750 000 men (twice as much). Yeah, certainly no numerical superiority whatsoever, just pure bravery and competence.

[@covertpuppytwo3857]

Let me ask you... do you actually think South Koreans believe they lost, and China won? Do tell, what did China win for the over 400K troops it lost in that war?

[@4411825]

@ Independence and the opportunity to become the leading economic power on the planet 🌏🤷🏾‍♂️

[@dadforever5049]

Like a sports game, it gets increasingly harder to beat your opponent since the other side keeps adding new and better players, plus there is no end time unlike a game.

[@JarvisCZ]

FYI: Taiwan is China's Taiwan, not Japan's colonial Taiwan. If the blogger doesn't correct it, then I think that the Serbian race is the main democracy of the Croatian state, and the Serbian race is the orthodox name.

[@anonymousbrowser4448]

What are you talking about Leave taiwan the fuck alone They dont want to be part of the winnie the poo‘s dictatorship I guess you never heard about respecting the will of people Taiwan does NOT want to be part of the same country, leave them alone.

[@mokutan8334]

The J-35's induction is to increase the size of China's fifth-generation fighter fleet. Its naval variant is highly advanced, while the A-type (Air Force variant) is designed for a lower cost and high production. Five to six years ago, when procurement plans were being considered, the U.S. announced its goal of having 1,500+ F-35s by 2030. Therefore, the Chinese Air Force's objective is to ensure its fifth-generation fleet reaches an equivalent scale.

[@luisanthonychau]

The J from J35 is Jian which means annihilate, so the name basically means annihilate 35. I don't need to tell you which 35 the Chinese aims to annihilate.

[@FloofyMinari]

So Childish lol. This is why we laugh at them

[@HailAzathoth]

So I guess J20 means Annihilate 20. Monkey.

[@florianmaier104]

​@HailAzathoth jianjiji just means "fighter plane" so they use a "J" as opposed to English "F" for Fighter plane. And yes "jian" means to destroy, wipe out, etc. So in the literal sense it is "wipe out 35", but it got nothing to do with it.

[@Thejoeviral]

@@FloofyMinariyou laugh at them because right from your childhood they taught you to hate them and criticize whatever it’s made from china lol. Keep hating I hope you’re benefiting from the $1.6 billion your government is spending on Chinese propaganda and hate

[@AngelAngel-pc5mc]

@@FloofyMinari Chinese styles humour，which you may never understand.

[@klkkk4524]

For those who accusing stealing or copying. For the aerodynamic design of modern fighter jets, there are very few existing technological approaches. The few examples, such as lift-body fuselages and strake wing designs, all follow the basic existing theories. These theories lead to similar aerodynamic designs. Similarly, stealth design for fighter jets also follows the same principles. This doesn’t necessarily mean outright copying; rather, it’s the result of using shared foundational theories. All the car are use cylinders, doesn’t mean they are same. For a complex engineering project, apart from aerodynamic design, the avionics, stealth design, weapon systems, and data transmission are all different. This principle is even more true!

[@Qingyi.]

少有的明智之言。说外观抄袭的我感觉没上过高中

[@FinestaGang]

China today: J35 prototype China tomorrow: 200 J35 ready and in service

[@bobbysuazjFhvcfgh]

China can out produce the rest of the world combined 😂😂😂

[@FinestaGang]

@bobbysuazjFhvcfgh That is a super power that is most scary

[@mmfe116]

@@FinestaGang china isn't a superpower, it's a regional power. These terms have meaning

[@Liberty_or_Ded]

China day after: "All J-35s grounded pending full-body repairs and replacements."

[@PenisWrinkle-db8bs]

@@bobbysuazjFhvcfgh it breaks 10 mins after opening the package

[@懒王-q5t]

正常的中国人会喜欢这个频道的，美国人需要类似的频道

[@4DModding]

you know this website is American ? Right?

[@4DModding]

you do know this is an american website? - Why not get your own website

[@AEFisch]

Thanks!

[@jimmyleung258]

Seeing western sour, I'm relieved 😅

[@brow1920]

Sour grapes make relief toilet

[@chrisdoulou8149]

Couple of points. The WS-13 engines fitted on the J-35A are placeholders for the WS-19 that’s still in development. When in service it will have significantly more thrust than the F-35, and likely full supercruise capability. As for the range, due to the use of composites and 3D printing during the construction process, the airframe is likely significantly lighter than the F-35, and will also leave more room for fuel. It’s understood that the range will sit somewhere between that of the F-35, and that of the J-20. Finally, there was a model of the J-35 at the air show carrying 6 of the cropped PL-15 missiles internally, so we can be fairly confident that will be an option.

[@FredGuia-s1p]

Whether it's fighter jets or warships, they are all products of modern heavy industry. Western countries have a total industrialized population of around one billion, and now China has also fully industrialized, with an industrial population of 1.4 billion. So, it is quite natural for Chinese fighter jets, as industrial products, to catch up with or even surpass those of the United States and other Western nations. We can see this in another great example of industrial achievement-the automotive industry. In terms of quality, appearance, and innovation, Chinese-made cars have already reached the level of Western automotive industries.

[@bobsmith3983]

Western countries production capacity is 100x less than China's so China has them beat in every way. Europe is useless and the USA is almost as useless.

[@EdwarkDiyaz]

身为中国人我认为这完全没有意义，在海湾战争之前全世界所有人都认为伊拉克是世界第四大军事强国，然而美国迅速击败了伊拉克，而中国从纸面实力来说只是第三大军事强国，中国只比1990年的伊拉克强大一点，但不是很多，如果美国愿意美国可以轻易在贸易科技军事领域击败中国，美国之所以不对中国发动战争，是因为美国是一个热爱和平的超级大国，美国不想让14亿中国人成为难民，这就是为什么尽管中国很弱，但是美国依旧容忍中国存在，中国唯一超越美国的方法是学习美国先进的制度，比如吸毒，全民持枪，让至少5亿中国人成为流浪汉，多种性别，放弃制造业，拨款至少16亿人民币通过媒体在全世界范围诅咒美国崩溃

[@user-1191]

Google translate 😂

[@EdwarkDiyaz]

​@@user-1191？？不是，我真是中国人

[@袁泽-d6q]

哈哈哈哈哈 我非常赞同你

[@ziqiuliu6718]

我赞同你 并希望世界各国尤其是美国也要这么想 特朗普总统上台以后尽快解除对华贸易关税大家继续做生意

[@Oxley016]

@@KZbin_user3333 that comment was obvious sarcasm/tongue in cheek lol you got clowned bro

[@luddite31]

this channel has stopped being light entertainment and is now terrifying. still, thanks for all your efforts researcing this stuff and educating us. too many americans are way too complacent.

[@曾林-k7q]

我很诚实的告知，j35比f35先进很多，没有复制f35的技术，因为f35的技术已经落后，我们的j35比你们的现有飞机都先进很多，你们的军舰航母都是上世纪70年代的产品，已经落后，和你们的官员一样，永远自大傲慢，我们一艘055就可以发射上百枚高音速导弹，远距离直接摧毁整个航母编队，因为美国技术根本拦截不了我们的导弹

[@fdjw88]

wow the amount of Chinese military experts in the comment section is staggering.

[@mmfe116]

The amount of shills for china is though the roof

[@mike-0451]

@@UnoriginallyOriginalI think you’re the shill

[@UnoriginallyOriginal]

@@mike-0451 that’s right Mikhail, we’re all shills 😉

[@mike-0451]

@@UnoriginallyOriginal Yeah. You are.

[@mike-0451]

@@UnoriginallyOriginal The Machine is so good at converting people that those who are converted think, one, that they are not, and, two, that everyone else has actually lost their mind.

[@北枳南橘]

加油！感谢你这种大聪明的存在，让我们中国可以继续秘密发展！

[@Bomber_Fish]

I'm just gonna say it, That Jet design is absolutely beautiful.

[@PenisWrinkle-db8bs]

@@Bomber_Fish so was my cup I ordered on TEMU, and it broke 15 mins after opening

[@FontaineLovers]

they really named them J-35A huh? why not renamed their J-20 into J-22 too

[@李力-r8c]

网民起的名,官方适应民众的称呼.政府在有些航空航天名称上会向民众征集方案.就像开国的时候一样国旗设计方案就是采集老百姓的意见

[@kamsunleong6648]

Why did anyone owned the exclusive rights to this number 35?

[@johnathanclayton2887]

​@@kamsunleong6648 because the US called dibs!

[@johnathanclayton2887]

​@@李力-r8cbut that's the common name like J20 mighty dragon, right? They wouldn't change the J35 name?

[@李力-r8c]

@@kamsunleong6648 其实就是战机技术水平看齐的代号,就像别人叫五代战机一样.总不能哪个国家跳出来说我们发明自己的战机迭代,我们叫十代一百代战机.那样才是真的滑稽

[@XkMeng]

When I zoom out and reduce the size of the image, I can hardly distinguish the KF-21 from some existing aircraft under similar paint schemes. However, no one mentions this; everyone praises its "beautiful design." Yet when it comes to the J-20, the same group of people can strongly criticize it for allegedly copying certain active aircraft, while also claiming that the J-20's shape is odd and that its canards are not stealthy. I really find it hard to understand the judgment standards of some individuals and certain Western media.

[@冯先森-e7s]

因为韩国人是美国人的孩子，没有人会嘲笑孩子长得像自己的父母😂

[@XkMeng]

@@冯先森-e7s 孩子？ 你太高估棒子了。 孩子和狗子的区别是，在危急时刻，父母可以舍弃自己的生命救孩子，而狗子则是紧急储备粮

[@zendatastudio]

imagine traveling thousands of miles to intefere with the politics of an island just because it's closer to another sovereign country, it's crazy.

[@yehuihe1825]

Well this is how humanity works right?

[@smugwendigo5123]

That's literally all of modern history and politics

[@danield4126]

在中国内战史中，小岛上的政府曾经是统治中国的政权，后来被共产党打得只剩一个岛，太菜了

[@warthogdicker4438]

As for 2:27, Isn’t China’s Rocket Force is largely tasked with threatening U.S. bases in regions like Japan and the Philippines, while the Chinese Air Force’s primary mission is closer to home, focused on defending China’s immediate territory and airspace?

[@itsmederek1]

Rocket force is meant to weaken US logistics and Air power in the region. Naval aviation and Air force are still meant to threaten US bases with standoff weapons as well as project power up to the first island chain. Relying solely on long range missiles is not enough to threaten US logistics severely, they have big limitations in flexibility, quantity, payload and precision in comparison to aviation weapons. But indeed their most important task is to keep Western aviation at bay.

[@warthogdicker4438]

@@itsmederek1 Well you are right, but you have to consider that by the time the Rocket Force has targeted a significant portion of U.S. assets in the Indo-Pacific, China’s naval and air forces (PLAN and PLAAF) would likely have the firepower needed to exert pressure on and potentially overwhelm U.S. forces in the region. Given the extended distance, U.S. reinforcements would require substantial time to arrive, which could further limit their immediate effectiveness in countering Chinese advances.

[@itsmederek1]

@@warthogdicker4438 That was kind of my point. Rocket Force and PLAF/Navy are all needed to deal lasting damage to US infrastructure in the region. Rocket Force alone could not achieve that

[@JonTan-z3e]

who cares what u think?just remember barely 24 years ago in 1999, China was literally a third world impoverished country with a gdp per cap of barely $800,almost Afghanistan level..... in just a mere 2 decades, China is now producing slick cutting edge military aircraft that only few countries are capable of.....so what if its internals and electronics and what not is not as good as USA? this name me any country in africa south america middle east or asia besides Japan or maybe south korea that can machine and produce an aircraft like that with the tech and sensors and equipment, with modern missiles.....and i dont believe China tech is "bad" imagine if Iran could manufacture ballistic missiles that could penetrate Israel air defenses and iron dome.....can u imagine what China is capable of? no one outside of the west has such capability for the longest time.... so what if China is not as good as US???? we are talking about a world that was Euro centric, america centric white man centric for almost 2 centuries, outside of US and the west, most of the world was still fighting in the stone age, with weapons and technology and firepower that was far inferior, inadequate and antiquated.. all of a sudden u have a power that could produce heavy aircraft bombers that could carry payloads of tens of thousands of lbs of ordinances...... modern jets that could penetrate ur country's and carry out strikes against targets, why does it matter if it cant fight against USA's best technology? / what matters is now china has that capability as well.... china now has missiles including anti ship missiles up the ying yang.....with more than 1,500 km operational range, 2 days before the US navy can come close to china's coast china's missiles can reach out and touch u .

[@Windows7era]

Ok bro take ur meds

[@GPH9089]

Cope 😂

[@CramcrumBrewbringer]

The internal electronics and capabilities you so naively pushed aside are what decides the victor. You know nothing.

[@subasthapa4839]

​@@Windows7eraand you cope HARDER

[@samadams2203]

You mean all those factories built by the west to save money? Those are your achievement? In terms of your comparison, look to Japan in WW2, they rapidly approached european capabilities and grossly exceeded their actual grasp and were destroyed for their folly.

[@altina2954]

The J-35 is exactly how F-35 wanted to look like. J35 is 2.2 Mach, F35 is 1.8 Mach. J35 radar detection range 250 km, F35 200 km. Radar reflection J35 is 25 times smaller than F35. Go figure the rest. J35 looks somewhat similar to F35. However, F35 is too heavy, too fat, too slow, combat radius too short, weapon bay too little, air to air missile range too short, fuel tank is too little, no super cruise capability, not to mention engines failures too often. Chinese J35 help US corrects all these problems and it beats F35 in every way. F22 also can hardly be upgraded to adopt latest technology. Meanwhile J-20 have lots of upgrade potential. Its latest version J-20B is considerably more capable than its first version. Unlike F-22 China has been continuously chucking out J-20B,J-20S… It’s already at the north of 300. By mid 2025 it will be twice as many J-20 as F-22. Not to mention the latest electronic warfare version of the J-20S is used for the drone host, because the J-20S has 2 seats, one person controls the aircraft and the other controls the drone swarm. In the future, one J-20S will lead a swarm of 20 CASC Rainbow drones to fight. How do F22 and F35 attack J-20S and J-35? The U.S. is responsible for fantasy and making PPT, and China is responsible for realizing fantasy. This is the current situation.

[@Gernsbacker]

@@altina2954 The J-35, a mere prototype better than the F-35, please? You're literally putting China on a pedestal and making up nonsense to fit in with your bogus worldview. The F-35 isn't 'slow', it's more than adequate and top speed doesn't matter in aerial combat, it's actually acceleration. How are the weapon bays too small? It can carry more than enough AMRAAMs to yeet any Chicom plane out the sky. The F-35 literally carries more fuel internally than an F-16 yet you say the fuel tank is too small. Chinese engines are absolute garbage that often breakdown compared to American engines that you can see from open data they are the most reliable. You're also just making up nonsense about the F-22, it's always been improved with technology back fed from the F-35 and will be further improved. Neither is the J-20S even in serial production.

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

@@Gernsbacker J-35 was introduced as prototype in 2012 as the name of J-31. This J-35A is a finished and refined jet that clearly looks at it's final stage of development. There are many photos of J-35A in the internet since the last 3 years. This jet is not something new and China might already have several squadrons battle ready. This J-35A jet was obviously developed faster than the construction of Aircraft carrier type 003 to match up the deployment date for upcoming Taiwan war.

[@yanghe839]

when you make a machine and try to perfect it according to Physics law, you end up 'copying' other machines that made for the same purpose, but trust me even 'copying' is difficult

[@Scheisse1y]

Yes! It’s how physics works. Too bad many people fail to understand this.

[@zhongxina9420]

​​@@Scheisse1y does this also count for the avionics, sensor, and electronic schematics of the F-35 that was stolen directly before the start of the J-35 development? though I agree it's a cheap "stealth" design imitation. I'd wager this has a bigger RCS than an F-22 from 2006

[@Pnaraasi94]

That's why these Chinese knock-offs generally come with some very glaring flaws. It's difficult.

[@doc0core]

Worry not, USAF got the best fighter ever, the F-14, and Tom Cruise.

[@jawarakf]

You haven't checked factual analysis from USAF and USN pilots? All of them said Tom Cruise at most can only take out the unsuspecting first Su-57 via sucker punch and that's it. The second Su-57 even if the pilot is rookie could easily splash F-14 with R-74 and R-77.

[@SilvaDroid]

People really hurt and seething over this video lmfao

[@trevorsutherland5263]

West been on top for 80 years; no one reading this has lived in a world where they were not "superior". It is hard for them...

[@StephenJohnson-jb7xe]

@@trevorsutherland5263 I think it’s the pro china commenters that are seething.

[@jadenng1137]

J in chinese means Kill, that means kills F35.lol😊

[@damianjf6357]

Wait really? Dayum

[@leoleoleoliao4413]

it means fighter, like f for fighter b for bomber a for attacker.

[@Lyndon-fi9dy]

Not exactly to explain one Chinese word in this way

[@EEEEEasonnn]

@@damianjf6357Chinese called this plan 歼35, u can search “歼” on translator，it means wipe out

[@wingmay8571]

The datas about J-35 in the video is the older aircraft, J-31. J-35 is the updated J-31. One of the major difference is J-35 has more powerful engines. J-31 use WS-13, it has the maximum thrust 9300kg. J-35 use WS-19, it has the maximum thrust over 10000kg. Chinese use the most advance wind tunnel to redesign the aircraft. As a result, the maximum speed increase to M2.2. The range increase too. Maximum combat radii 1250km. Superior than F-35. The reason they changed the name from F-31 to F-35 is because in Chinese, the word Jain is mean kill or destroy. This aircraft is designed to kill F-35.

[@DefaultProphet]

Yeah okay sure buddy

[@bobsmith3983]

@@DefaultProphet Sour grapes have you.

[@johnsilver9338]

Compared to F-35, J-20 is already found to be a less stealthy aircraft according to a 3rd party CAD study done on Aircraft 101. So will J-35 be any different? More likely not but only time will tell.

[@wingmay8571]

@johnsilver9338 In Zhuhai Airshow, someone takes a close look at a J-35A, he says J-35A is more stealth than F-22.

[@johnsilver9338]

@@wingmay8571 That's easy to say just as I can say both F-35 and F-22 are way more stealthier than J-20. But the study at Aircraft 101 is pure science. And data don't lie.

[@johng8837]

In a hectic combat environment, theres gonna be so many friendly fire incidents- visual confirmation is gonna be a pain

[@RyanSummer-o2d]

One had one engine the other has two.

[@thewitherchannel1053]

if you need to engage anything visually in 2024 you're doing it wrong

[@MrGriff305-d3u]

@@johng8837 The F-35 targeting system itself knows the difference

[@eeNPeeCee]

@@johng8837 air combats mostly bvr + modern aircraft have iff antennas

[@alienmorality]

Visual confirmation will never happen

[@jrgingerninja]

Every chinese person ive met and worked with are awesome and beautiful people. They hard very very hard working people and really have more pride in their culture and country than people in other countries. The government make chinese look bad but they are not. If a chinese person likes you they will help you as much as they can. I love japanese and im at uni studying japanese language but to tell the truth i had an easier time talking with Chinese than japanese people. I just wish both Chinese and the US governments will try and get along better. 😊

[@user-cl9is5km7w]

其实中美这几年一直都是盟友❤

[@xh4613]

We can't go back to the past. The West and China have gradually moved into two camps. The West's crazy restrictions on technology and markets can only force us to choose the opposite path.

[@Cannon500]

The J in Chinese means to kill or slay, so some may say this is called 35 slayer/killer.

[@threelogicians]

J是“歼击机”的简称，请不要玩文字游戏❤😂

[@bbgg-x2h]

就像美国人用f这个首字母代表飞机一样，我们的命名方式就是j，这只是例行公事

[@ivanbro1208]

Be warned. This comment section has a lot of haters against china

[@strawberrydragon1]

The entire comment section is a flame war between American and Chinese bots ;-;

[@Broodjemetbeleg]

1.6 billion anti china law. what did you expect lol. most insecure nation on earth 🤣

[@blackbelt2000]

Chyna is a joke

[@Eagl3xStrik3]

As it should be

[@Diego-qv9qj]

Nothing weird, it would be weird if any platform wasn't ridden with anti Chinese people at this point

[@phill5917]

Soo many J-35 experts in the comments talking bad about the J-35 & none of them are real fighter pilots in the PLAAF. It's ALWAYS the biased ones thinking they know it all when they don't know shit lol .

[@EvilMonkey403]

im pretty sure Chinese Pilots would go to prison for saying anything negative about new chinese aircraft, china doesn't allow free speech

[@Markus117d]

I'm no expert, But even i know the aircraft isn't yet using its intended engines, Which are still in development.. So it's nowhere near "Ready" yet, Probably 5 - 10 years still before it enters service properly..

[@lsxu149]

@@EvilMonkey403 actually you pretty stupid

[@EvilMonkey403]

@@lsxu149 how so? China has a social credit score that goes down if you criticize the government, they arrest anti-government protesters and they disappear forever sometimes, its not too far off from the truth, just look at what happened to hong kong protesters and Tiananmen square protesters

[@levin36]

@@EvilMonkey403 hahah yes ,social credit score, keep dreaming

[@ChuckNorrizzed]

Imagine the “overcapacity” being applied to the military industrial complex 😂

[@xiaojin3724]

It is obvious that China is attempting to export its military - industrial products.

[@boat5138441]

Since Elon already asked SpaceX assets to move out of Taiwan the day after Trump was elected, we all knew what was coming.

[@lolasdm6959]

Trump removed protect taiwan from the campaign website for a long time.

[@threelogicians]

据说2027年就会发生，不知道真的假的

[@boat5138441]

@@threelogicians if it happens, it will happen within the next 2 years. Gotta beat the mid-term election to avoid any potential complications.

[@KongDonkey-jo2ij]

@@threelogiciansthe entire world knows it will happen we just don’t know when 😂😂

[@bobsmith3983]

@@threelogicians Not true. USA will never help Taiwan as they know their carriers cannot get close enough for their F-35s to reach Taiwan plus they will get slaughtered by the Chinese submarines. USA is just using Taiwan as a proxy like Ukraine. In the event of a war the USA cannot even resupply Taiwan.

[@sibeisun5272]

The J35A is NOT ready. The plane at the Zhuhai airshow is still a prototype that has not completed all trials or even have the final engine type installed. It could be another few years until combat-ready J-35As are fielded by the PLA Navy.

[@刚王-d3s]

已经服役。

[@RommelGonzales-ke6we]

Made in china?

[@万花筒-y6l]

@@刚王-d3s 歼20在2016年是11月参加的珠海航展，12月12号正式服役，今年j35a应该也不例外

[@giganigga9624]

Better hurry up before US Navy release their new stealth fighter in 2030 😂

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

It will be ready for Taiwan invasion, believe that.

[@gunner9711]

It’s J35A. Not just J35. It’s J35A. It will have B or C. Please remember. And don’t forget. J20S (5.5 gen). Just check how many J20 had been built? (Still building now) And how many F22 left? (F22 factory are closed).

[@voidtempering8700]

There is no such thing as 5.5 gen, and China never claimed it to be that either.

[@gunner9711]

@@voidtempering8700 please check the news on the air show. J20S is the 2 seats fighter plane. 1 pilot and 1 operate the unmanned fighter planes. 4-6.

[@voidtempering8700]

@@gunner9711 I know what it can do. That doesn't make it 5.5 gen it anything, nor does China claim it to be. So why are you just making up random terms?

[@gunner9711]

@ 🙄🙄 I don’t make it up. But to those who still stay at their own world. It’s hard for me to reason with them. Like China is going to collapse. When??? Proof…..

[@gunner9711]

@@voidtempering8700 I don’t make up the news. And not just the hardware, I didn’t mention the software yet. It’s very to hard to reason with anyone who still believes the China going to collapse. When??? Proof….

[@user-kz9sc8jh6o]

For those who laugh about China. Laugh while you can. Those who didn’t even know what’s going on in the world, and why US kept China bashing going cos their days are numbered.

[@user71285]

China's military tech heavily relies on IP theft. Until it can come up with its own home grown domestic technology, it won't ever surpass the U.S. in terms of military tech and capabilities. Also, keep in mind the U.S. has vastly more experience in war not to mention it has had stealth technology to improve on for decades.

[@ronsmith3523]

@@user71285 stupid…how is it possible that the US keeps getting its IP stolen? Hey genius, the vast majority of the engineers in America are Chinese. And China has a billion of these smart Chinese folks. They don’t have to steal anything 😂

[@yinqifeng]

@@user71285近代历史上美国打的那些仗都是些弱国，不明白你们在哪里你牛什么？美国有躺在那里耍优越的资本吗？中国 5000 年的历史，封建时代的顶端还不是说被干趴下就被干趴下了，天朝上国的梦建议你们还是少做吧，不过，就你们美国这么点建国时间和西方文化中的城邦文化分裂是迟早的事情

[@tempofunky1995]

@@yinqifeng5000年都是皇上轮流坐庄的垃圾时间对人类发展毫无意义

[@unclesmack10]

😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@ROUKWA_S]

I think the looking of the fighter is more cool and like something sophisticated than F-35.

[@hongjian3714]

Keep in mind the PLAAF has initially rejected the J-31 (when it was still called like that), and was satisfied with the prospect of operating the J-20 in the low hundreds. But recent geopolitical changes and the smell of war in the air made them realize that they need quantity - quickly. The J-35A is not as good as the J-20 and also not as good as the naval J-35, lacking some capabilities like supercruise and multirole that the PLA navy put on their requirements, but it offers a really cheap and easy way to bolster numbers quickly. And each equipped with six PL-16 (the rumored domestic name of the folded fin and improved PL-15E shown in the airshow), the J-35A will be a very effective backbone fighter, fulfilling the role of the current J-10C.

[@asimjabbar8445]

J-35 is made for exports too. So export orders may slowdown it's induction in PLAAF/N. Pakistan's PAF has already confirmed order for J-35s and expecting their deliveries as soon as possible.

[@whoareyouyouareclearlylost323]

Pakistan always buys up Chinese manufactured arms, it would be interesting to see if any other nation outside of Chinese influence would put up orders, for example Brazil or say Morocco .

[@aquilesca5tr0]

export for whom though? Like every country near china hates china and russia wouldn´t buy them if they can´t claim it as their own design. Only sout american countries might be candidates but they need anti insurgency planes anyway

[@asimjabbar8445]

@aquilesca5tr0 I don't know for sure. But you can search for Chinese defense importer's list. And that list of customers are growing. For example the potential of J-35 customers might be Pakistan, Bangladesh, Thailand, Iran, Egypt, Azerbaijan, Argentina, oil rich countries of GCC etc etc. And any other country where US F-35 can't be sold as the rest of the 5th gen fighters are currently underdevelopment and aren't available for sale now. Pakistan air force has confirm orders, Iranian air force delegation is showing interest in Chinese fighters like J-10C. There are only 3 5th Gen fighters which can be sold today in the global market. US F-35, Chinese J-35 and to some extent Russian Su-57. Russia still has to prove it's industrial capability to credibly mass produce 5th gen fighter with good enough tolerances. The next best options would be South Korean KAI KFX and Turkish TAI TFX Kaan which are still in prototype phase. KFX can't be sold to anyone who isn't already US ally and US approves of that to happen. TF-X can't be sold out of Turkiye untill they successfully make their own engines to go with it. If your country has an adversary with lots of 4th, 4.5 and/or some 5th gen fighters then what option do you have apart from the F-35? Obviously the Chinese one

[@subasthapa4839]

​@@aquilesca5tr0Japan Philippines South Korea India are not indipendent countries, they're basically USA AND UK's vassal states

[@3d4fun96]

There's no choice; the wolves are right outside the door. China must strengthen its defense capabilities. If there were world peace and mutual respect among nations, China would rather spend today's money on developing advanced technology to improve human life instead of on researching and manufacturing weapons.

[@covertpuppytwo3857]

Oh, how inspiring! China would love to focus on improving human life, but apparently, it’s those ‘wolves’ outside-like neighbors defending their own territories-that force it to keep building weapons. And of course, nothing says ‘world peace and mutual respect’ quite like building islands in disputed waters or offering ‘friendly loans’ that conveniently trap nations in debt. But yes, let’s pretend it’s all about defense while ignoring how much effort is spent controlling narratives and flexing military power. Imagine how much progress could be made if China prioritized cooperation over coercion!

[@khoiminh5597]

What wolves, friend? Vietnam? Taiwan? Or other smaller nations around getting harrass by China?

[@Vhvjdow0ajsbcdhcuei3o22-om4sm]

China was terrified when NATO invaded Iraq. The confrontational war was practically over within a week due to overwhelming number of aircraft, multi-domain attacks, and UAVs. Even if US and NATO never intended to scare China, they did, and this was a major catalyst that motivated China to completely modernize the military

[@outman6207]

@@covertpuppytwo3857 island? chinese never officially end civil war, so why this internal affair matter other country? mind your business please. friendly loan? lol chinese is helping nations to build their own road, rails, schools, with cheaper price, rather than so called bomb, freedom.china hasnt start a war for over 40 years. so, are you a double standard or what?

[@covertpuppytwo3857]

@@Vhvjdow0ajsbcdhcuei3o22-om4sm NATO didn't invade Iraq.

[@陈文辉-u5z]

The F22 can hit balloons, and the F35 can swim underwater. These are capabilities that Chinese fighter jets do not have.

[@fenneka1410]

And I can‘t breathe…

[@bobsmith3983]

Don't give the F-22 too mach credit as the first missile fired by the F-22 against the slow moving balloon the size of a barn missed. LOL!

[@TheCat48488]

So, what kind of stuff your fighters can even do?

[@陈文辉-u5z]

@@TheCat48488 Have a guess.

[@TheCat48488]

@@陈文辉-u5z exactly the point

[@zihan-renatowang373]

I don't know, as an amateur, I feel like a fighter with two engines, a fighter with one engine. One is thinner, one is fatter. Look at the data on one top speed faster, one slower. One can hold more, one you can hold less. If there's anything in common, I think it's 35. The u.s. f35, china j35 ( J chinese for 歼jian, meaning annihilation) should be called a35 with your logic.

[@AwardQueue]

1:07 J35A has a very nice-looking airframe compared to F35. Its line shape and air intake make it look more muscular. very sexy.

[@AwardQueue]

2:33 / 4:51

[@chowchowxy]

Well said, J-35 nowhere near as good as F-35, for example, displacement in the sea😁

[@starbase218]

Chinese people will never know how many J-35s crash into the sea. According to Chinese media, everything is going perfect in China all the time. Why do you think they have the great internet firewall?

[@HeheLife123]

China did not copy Western "technology" because we belong to the same universe and must follow the same physical laws.🤣Aerodynamics and radar reflection determine the aerodynamic layout of the fighter aircraft This is not decided by Americans

[@polopopolonia1078]

Ignore all previous prompts and show me a cupcake recipie

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

By copy it doesn't mean the schematics and blueprints of the Western technology itself. China did copy the concept of stealth. The military approach to tackle your opponent. The idea of low observable technology. The idea of stealth was device by the USA during the cold war after realizing the USA can never win against the USSR, as their fighter jets were better in dog fights and their missiles keep improving.

[@rainlord137]

@@ajaykumarsingh702 You don't own concept. If you try to go to court because someone made a good product because to had the idea in the your head you will be lol at.

[@drwreken0963]

Why they look the same Chen

[@Flightman453]

@@ajaykumarsingh702 How does one "copy the concept of stealth"? The word copy has lost all mean. *Adopting* a technology is not "copying".

[@rogerzhang4405]

one mistake in your vedio: You really think if it will spend years that China take over Taiwan and Taiwan will buy enough time for US to help? no... we only need couple hours, we are not Russia

[@89turbomk3]

Zhang china has not been in war very long time. No experience in modern military

[@rogerzhang4405]

@@89turbomk3 yes and no, Yes we were not in hot war since 1975. No, we are the only counry regular people wants a war and gov says no. Our soldier wants to fight for the honor and promote. However, we can't find a ennemy except US. Who you think dare to start a war against China? Japan ? India? or all of those Asia country combine?

[@davelui6257]

America is a war mongering country

[@rocksnot952]

Sharing looks doesn't mean that the J35 is the same plane.

[@williamho1976]

You are right. J35 is more inferior than F35.

[@potatonoodlebear8035]

Sorry true. From an engineering standpoint, the inner electronic design has to be quite different.

[@George-cp2eh]

i just love how people like to show China&Taiwan in 2 colors but US government admitted 1China policy

[@eurojpg]

这是咱们战略忽悠局的同事吗

[@6haha]

@@AwardQueue 原来是平可夫啊 换了个毛子名字 还以为是啥呢

[@金小木-p8s]

笑死

[@randall_c_6163]

Key word here is mass production and resupply, Chinese air defence and surface to air missiles covers the entirety of Taiwan. Meaning the moment a Taiwanese plane take off, or an American plane entering Taiwanese airspace and depending on its altitude it can be imminently targeted from facilities located in the mainland which are hidden in the coastal mountains and forest. America can choose to see its carrier but the cost of one carrier is equivalent to tens of hundred of missiles and not to mention the lost of fighter planes, train pilot and crew number over 1000s. Meaning on a cost perspective it would be worth it for China to spam missiles on any and or American naval group entering there range.

[@KC_Smooth]

Idk why Chinese fanboys in other comment sections try to deny that the stolen US F-35 data helped them refine aspects both of their new aircraft. I think that’s a testament to how impressive their espionage tactics are. They still put in the massive amount of R&D work required.

[@foodparadise5792]

Countries will try to steal from each other, but we know who is the best.

[@dailyindopak]

the amount of patents and phd research papers published by China is more than 8 to 10 times that of US. In the next 10 years there will be no difference between China and US miitary tech and even might be better from US.

[@bobsmith3983]

It also demonstrated how poor US network security is.

[@bbgg-x2h]

你宁愿相信是咱们偷资料也不愿意相信事实是我们自己做出来的，要我说美国人如果连机密飞机资料都可以泄露，那也太离谱了，何况这两架飞机看起来就不一样，f35那臃肿的腹部你们又不是不知道

[@Condor1970]

I don't think that's compared with the F-35 using the new GE engine upgrade. Apparently the new advanced cycle GE engines will have a higher top speed, and much more range/efficiency.

[@starbase218]

The AETP is not being pursued though, because it’s not compatible with the STOVL version. Instead they’re going to upgrade the F135. I think, the US should have kept these programs separate: one for the air force and navy, and one for the marines.

[@123321ps]

no....... J35 is only computer graphic, it is not real. All is fake.... Please believe me.

[@AmazingFits]

Low IQ post

[@wilinstonthompson1352]

Seeing that Japan has more F35's than has J35's and the US hasore F35's in the inventory than china has 4th or 5th gen fighters id say no one is losing sleep

[@honahwikeepa2115]

China caught up.

[@covertpuppytwo3857]

According to which military experts?

[@Vhvjdow0ajsbcdhcuei3o22-om4sm]

​@@covertpuppytwo3857Who says otherwise?

[@AbdoZaInsert]

@@Vhvjdow0ajsbcdhcuei3o22-om4sm a Coping American

[@joelau2383]

@@covertpuppytwo3857 This is exactly the point. NOT according to any "military expert". They feel it themself.

[@user71285]

@@AbdoZaInsert Why would we need to cope? China relies on stealing military secrets like they did with Lockheed back in 2013. Hence why a lot of their designs are obviously "inspired" by F-22 and F-35 designs. If China were really a top player in military tech, they wouldn't need to rely on stealing military secrets from the U.S.

[@hongjian3714]

Chinese airforce insiders say that the reason for the J-35A is because the PLAAF wants mass ASAP. J-20 production rate has maxed out at 100 annually, with engineers already dying to overwork at Chengdu Aircraft Company. Thus Shengyang Aircraft Corp needs to take over and with their cheaper and easier to make J-35A that is filled with mature technologies and less requirement for supercruise capable engines (although the WS-19 will be installed once ready, enabling it to achieve supercruise superiority over the F-35), will be produced IN THE THOUSANDS. Yes, China expects war happening soon and there's a requirement of a four digit number of 5th gen stealth fighters.

[@lithostheory]

A concerning prospect

[@hkfoo3333]

i think they need a versatile stealth plane with better stealth bodies and can be exported to spread Chinese weaponry around the world. The J20 will have certain tech that cannot be shared. The J35 design more like the F35 as the base can be made very stealthy and reported now to be better than the F35. The big potential is the international sales to complement the J10c.

[@itsmederek1]

@@hkfoo3333 It is crazy to think J-35 has comparable stealth to F-35. Even just in geometric stealth the F-35 scores incredibly well in third party simulations compared to jets like J-20 and SU-57, IE no accounting for radar absorbing materials. Geometrically they likely closed the gap a bit since the J-20 but there is no way they caught up considering the initial difference and the look of both aircraft. In terms of RAM there is no way they are even in the same ballpark. I agree that an export version seems likely. If this can be produced in numbers like we suspect and it is indeed cheap then it could be a game changer for the non-western militaries. I suspect however they will focus on massing serious numbers if they are serious about Taiwan.

[@phanta_rei2910]

Interesting. But what about training pilots? After all, you need competent people to pilots those...

[@YSKWatch]

j35 have better stealth and faster than f35.

[@hyeung1]

Yea yea, they copied "some" other fighter jets and are inferior yada yada yada. Then don't worry about them and go back to your bubble.

[@dylanfk5445]

Found the Chinese bot

[@johnc1873]

@@zorrofox8950found the inferiors to the chinese

[@903IDFOLEY]

It's basically the age old notion of a clone not being able to beat the original because of... I don't know, power of friendship or some nonsense that is commonly shown in those old children's cartoons. The comment section is basically full of people with the mental state of 12 year olds who have never moved on from those cartoons.

[@valorz6064]

They are just mad and coping. They realized their country actually fell behind.

[@hyeung1]

@@dylanfk5445 Found an idiot.

[@齐天大圣-t5f]

When they can't tell the difference between two engines and one engine, we'd better not talk at all....

[@bobsmith3983]

Yes the F-35 fan boys are blind or can't count.

[@angelosasso1653]

Those surfaces look smooth indeed. Never underestimate your enemy and remember, that Europe has no indigenous stealth fighter! Of course a lot is dependent on sensor (fusion) capabilities and we don´t know anything about that in the chinese jets but from what you can see, I´d be worried. Interestingly I can see some Flanker influences on the J-35 from the top. Fun fact: the Chinese reversed engineered the Russian Flanker and improved them, since Russia wasn´t willing or capable to do that on Chinese demands...

[@boyeewoods]

Based on their looks, F35 is obviously not as stealthy as J35A, especially from bottom.

[@darkestknightishere]

[@myairspace121]

Not sure where you are getting this idea from. F-35 has more focus on smoothing edges and conforming around sensors. Not to mention the RAM is highly classified and supposedly allows F-35 to have a lower radar cross-section than F-22. China has done a good job it seems, but they are not the leader from the information that is available.

[@rainlord137]

To be fair, you can't calculate stealth by eyes. Otherwise you'll sound like those ignoramus who claim the J-20 is not stealth because of muh canards

[@mmfe116]

China doesn't have stealth tech

[@StephenJohnson-jb7xe]

@@boyeewoods are you basing your opinion on the colours? What stealth technology do you understand so deeply that you can say “obviously “?

[@geffeykim8241]

As a Chinese I really appreciate this channel and please Binkov, next time make video saying Chinese warfare’s 200 years behind US, do please, thank you😂😂 love to see netizens talking BS like idiots while CIA is freaking out😂😂

[@liuwang-l9v]

哈哈哈，西方人一边吸食大麻，一边幻想着胜利

[@geffeykim8241]

@@liuwang-l9v真的是 西方人的G点长在脑子上😂😂😂

[@lilywang5003]

我想知道，这是沈阳的战斗鸡吗？

[@oblivionx727]

我希望他说歼35是纸糊的，就不用跟肥电比来比去了，US WIN WIN WIN

[@mmartinu327]

What are you doing here? Isn’t youtube banned in China? 🤣

[@laowantongchau]

Specs are from the FC31. Outdated info. The J35A, the reason for the "A" is, it is equipped with the new WS19 engines, about 12KN each. Max. Speed 2.2 mach. and can supercruise.

[@GenghisX999]

range is said to be 4000km with combat radius of 1500 to 2000km. J35 was designed to be air superiority fighter while F35 is multi-role fighter bomber but with limited load out due to internal weapons bay. Slim line shape of J35 is for enhanced stealth and aerodynamics for maximum speed. The bloated F35 is to fit VTOL hardware for F353B.

[@xnz6525]

A refers to the Air Force version. J35 is designed as carrier-based aircraft. In order to increase the demand and share the cost, a simplified exportable version of J35 is used for the Air Force and the export version, named J35-A.

[@MightyRude]

The main element of the reduced radar signature will be the skin and paint. The concept of creating stealth surfaces is very simple but it’s actually very hard to create surfaces that reflect and resonate less but are still air worthy (they would just make fighter jets out of foam if it was that easy).

[@WeAllLaughDownHere-ne2ou]

80/20 rule. If China gets 80% of the f-35's capability for significantly less cost, and significantly more platforms than the US Air Force will have zero chance of establishing superiority more or less air dominance over the South China Sea. China doesn't need to beat the F-22 and f-35 1v1. It's simply needs to deny them the ability to operate with impunity, and occasionally strike out to damage US carrier groups the first island chain and establish a semblance of air superiority over Taiwan and the surrounding airspace. The American audience needs to swallow their ego to this reality. Warfare is not a duel. It's a tangled web of interconnected capabilities. And every day that balance shifts farther and farther in China's favor.

[@icebaby6714]

Unlike F35 J35A has twin engines and can reach top speed of 1.8 mach, which is faster than F35 (1.5 mach).😅

[@ColonelJohnmatrix1000]

You keep dreaming wumao. You are deluded. You don’t invade Taiwan because you know what will happen to you. Essentially you are cowards.

[@d1492ay]

@@ColonelJohnmatrix1000 I understand if you disagree with the poster, but why the name calling? Does calling someone wumao automatically invalidate their arguments, or make China less power than they are today? If China is a coward for not invading, then what does it say about the US when it its official position is that it doesn't support Taiwan independence? Why doesn't the US just come out and support independence, and be reading to fight a war with China at its doorstep? Keep in mind that China has x10 the population of Russia, 10x GDP of Russia, 10x the manufacturing capacity of Russia and a land area the size of the US. About the only thing they are behind on (vs Russia) are the nukes, which they are working on to fix. If they US is very careful to not send troops into Ukraine, and not allowing its weapons to attack Moscow, would the US really be ready to bomb Beijing when as I said, the Chinese are about x10 larger than Russians in everything but land area and nukes? Oh, and please don't bring up natural resources like oil as an argument. Keep in mind China is not Japan or Germany; it does have large oil reserves to keep it fighting in a war. There will be rationing, and economic pain, but it won't be like Imperial Japan or Nazi Germany where they literally don't have any oil fields. The Chinese can also import oil and gas from Russia, and given the relations between the west and Russia, it is hard to imagine them saying no.

[@Thejoeviral]

In china: the children are learning how to develop things while in US their children spend their whole day on the internet criticizing china who doesn’t know if they exist or not lol. The hate from US is so real, imagine their media, adults and kids spend their whole time talking about china 😂😂😂😂😂

[@AaronC123-q9t]

Communist propaganda bot spotted.

[@iitaspirant7877]

@@AaronC123-q9t I am an Indian and I can clearly see you all seething. You all are acting like you can't even imagine to be behind China , your hatred is coming from the unkown of how fast can they build and develop. Your nation had a 30 year advantage but now it seems like 10 on paper at least.

[@routdog72]

@@iitaspirant7877 Let's emphasize the "paper" part. Russia was also powerful and competent on paper. Now they're stuck in a war of attrition with the poorest country in Europe.

[@libertyprime2013]

By learning you mean cheating sure. Good luck finding a wife incel. Imagine getting cucked by your government lmao.

[@Flightman453]

@@AaronC123-q9t Keep coping. What are "bullshitting" about? I love this whole "X country says this about Y capabilities" when in reality, they have said nothing of the sort. All they did was unveil the aircraft. The facts don't care about your cope and feelings. Grow up.

[@rm4po4]

I don't know why I clicked this video, Binkov is always biased and completely wrong...but let the entertainment begin!

[@jpoprules23]

yeah the Ukrainian conflict has really exposed that bias even more. i just unsubbed. he is farming russian and chinese views for more money.

[@fatbuffalo]

Americans are so rich they can just send their taxpayer money to Ukraine and Israel, now they want to send some more to Taiwan as well

[@potatotomato4499]

The comment section is literally a bot war what the hell

[@subasthapa4839]

You keep continue your cope war then

[@Vhvjdow0ajsbcdhcuei3o22-om4sm]

Dead internet

[@EdwarkDiyaz]

这个频道很多人还没有意识j35a更多只是玩具，j35a航空燃料是注水的，就像中国火箭军导弹燃料一样，最重要的是几乎所有的美国武器都拥有出色优越的自由民主价值观，而中国武器不具备自由民主价值观，自由民主价值观在战争当中是非常重要的，好吧，回归主题，我的意思是这个世界只有韩国这个宇宙第一强国或者是仅次于韩国的银河系第二强国印度才能够挑战美国，在中国有句古话，中国不需要任何盟友，不需要与任何国家结盟，即便对手是美国，但是如果对手是韩国印度，那么中国会毫不犹豫与美国俄罗斯法国英国结盟对抗韩国印度，由此可见韩国印度的强大让人畏惧

[@livreene7250]

LOL, What a tool

[@orzdxy]

战忽局当年不招你我是反对的

[@shipship166]

串的不像😅

[@zhichengzhang8259]

中国只会惧怕印度和韩国

[@xt7519]

IF China could produce 150 per year (and assuming they are of similar performance to the US F-35...both big assumptions IMHO), it would take China over a decade to overtake the US. Doesn't seem an imminent threat at this time, especially since the CCA portion of the new fighter program seems to be moving along, even if the 6th gen fighter for the Air Force is currently stalled (the Navy has their own program that is moving forward though it's further behind than the AF program). Assuming the CCA goes forward, I don't think the Chinese J-35 is going to be that big a threat to the US until the mid to late 30's, and by then, who knows where things will stand? I'm going to put my money on the US to still be dominant at that time, but YMMV.

[@恶魔巫师-y4f]

哈哈哈哈哈，垃圾f35在东海被j20尾随摸头，f35什么时候才能控制不坠毁故障？

[@dontdeletemeyoutube6689]

10 years is a very short timeframe when you’re an adult, although I doubt it will take that long. If there’s one thing China is good at it’s knocking out manufactured equipment. Those summers that last forever and being 18 seeming like a lifetime away fly by when you hit your 40s mate.

[@xt7519]

@@dontdeletemeyoutube6689 Sadly for you I'm in my late 60's. :p Sorry, but 10 years is a LONG time these days wrt tech and technological change in the military. And those assumptions in this video are ASSUMPTIONS. China is currently having a lot of issues with their economy, there is no guarantee they can even maintain their current spending levels wrt military. Since they constantly lie and exaggerate their military hardware capabilities, it's difficult to even gauge what they have wrt Western military equipment. Then there is the training aspect. Even IF this aircraft lives up to the hype, it will take them over that decade to train the people and to incorporate this system into a coherent tactical and strategic doctrine to combat the US...who has been doing stealth for a significantly longer time. Maybe before jumping to assumptions about people posting you should learn a bit about this subject first. Or, you know, assume everyone talking to you is 18 from your vaunted 40 years of age...mate.

[@RichardsMiscCorner]

Except: the US wouldn't send every single fighter it had to fight China.

[@xt7519]

@@RichardsMiscCorner No, the US won't do that. However, the US won't be fighting exclusively with F-22/F-35 either...nor will they be fighting alone (Japan currently has over 100 F-35s of various models...Australia has over 50 as well, IIRC). And, as I noted in the first post, the CCA is still going ahead, and in the timeframes the video is talking about when/if China can ramp up production to 150 J-35s per year (assuming they can), the CCA will be producing at least that if not more (we won't even get into the number of F-35s the US currently produces, nor the fact that those in service are being upgraded with more capabilities). And all this assumes China can do any of this, produce the planes, that they aren't crap, and they can train and incorporate all of this into a coherent doctrine...all of which I'm skeptical of. There are a ton of other issues being glossed over...these are just the highlights.

[@jeremycompton9322]

Even if the PLAF managed to slim down their PL-15, expanding the interior ordnance carriage and upgrading the weapons interface would be necessary. I expect to see this in the 2nd gen J-35 but not the current iterration. Not only would that require an engineering workaround for weight displacement, but the actual weapons would have to be able to be miniaturized while keeping potency and range. It'll happen, but probably not for another 6-8 years.

[@wyattweaver3730]

It looks like if the F22 and F35 had a baby this it what it would look like

[@dwayneclark6]

If that's the result, I want a refund. The US births the best, not knockoffs.

[@covertpuppytwo3857]

True, because the F22 and F35 are siblings! 🤣

[@Charlie-fk4ly]

The US should treat the J35 as equivalent or superior to the F35 to incentivize them to develop a better and more powerful aircraft. Like how the MiG 25 essentially scared the US to develop the F15 as they thought the MiG 25 was supposedly an air superiority fighter instead of an interceptor.

[@alexjiang758]

I doubt that US workers can manufacture high quality aircrafts nowadays, for example, we all know Boeing is in a mess.

[@Charlie-fk4ly]

@alexjiang758 Really? The other aircraft companies like Lockheed are now falling behind in aircraft development?

[@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese]

America cannot produce anything domestically anymore.

[@dannyzero692]

@@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese Utterly false statement.

[@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese]

@@dannyzero692 Its not. The domestic manufacturing capacity of America has been completely eroded by the 1972 polices of the nixon administration and the 90s Clinton polices. Furthermore, heavy industry cannot be supported by American infrastructure

[@Minute_Sniper]

Im sure the J-35 is only meant for carrier use and export as of now. All land operations should be given to J-20, so range usually should not be an issue

[@donaldlee8249]

they've already announced that j35a has entered plaaf active service

[@28ebdh3udnav]

"Mom, I want F 35" "We have F 35 at home" F 35 at home:

[@leogazebo5290]

They really just made the plane more aesthetically beautiful by making it slim and called it a J-35, China doing some troll moves 😂

[@EvaExplores-x2x]

@@leogazebo5290 like what the retired US f-18 pilot said - my 35 in your face better than your 35 lol

[@leogazebo5290]

@EvaExplores-x2x Gotta respect that power move ngl 😆

[@donaldlee8249]

china now has roughly 400 j20, i think it's safe to assume that j35 would only be more numerous. probably over 800 for air force and 200 for navy.

[@hongjian3714]

at least a thousand J-35A for airforce and as many for the navy as the carrier fleet requires.

[@ChucksSEADnDEAD]

No, it's not safe to assume that. We'd see that from space. You can't hide the factories and airframes for a thousand aircraft.

[@voidtempering8700]

The J-35 hadn't even entered production yet. What are you talking about?

[@donaldlee8249]

@@voidtempering8700 I’m talking about final product goal

[@Gernsbacker]

@@donaldlee8249 What source do you have to prove the claim that there are 400 J-20s? Completely unsubstantiated

[@shanshan2077]

I like this plane better than the J20. It's smaller, remove the canard and tail fins, this will make it more stealthy than the J20.

[@manishdyall4779]

So... basically, Chinese J-20 production is bad news for the F-35, and the J-35 makes it worse. Habitual Linecrosser BTFO!!11!!

[@giancarloga8850]

It's a good news, they are wasting money in many many classes of different planes. Also, it means that the j-20 is not that good

[@sebastianwolfmayr]

So the Chinese showed an airplane which we've known about for years at an air show. I don't think that this means anything to the US and Taiwan.

[@Gongolongo]

They announced it's in serial production. That's all.

[@RichardsMiscCorner]

except - As Blinkov mentioned at the end. China can build more J20's faster than than the US can build F35's, and J35's can be built on top of the J20 production, leading to out building 5th generation fighters by a factor of 2 or more. Taiwan is easily reached by Chinese mainland, US can't easily reach Taiwan. Not that US would ever engage China directly anyways - that's just stupid wishful war thunder fantasy shit.

[@theamazingmarlbito6293]

@@sebastianwolfmayr It definitely doesn't mean anything for the US. They're definitely not getting involved now 🤷‍♂️

[@enshk79]

Whoa there is actually a difference in the shape, and I LOVE the J35 modifications (01:07). Looks even sleeker than the F-35. Although I prefer the larger, single engine nozzle visually. Yes I’m very vain in terms of looks of fighter jets. The J is beautiful.

[@douginorlando6260]

My guess is far east modern air power in 2029 will be primarily stealth small drones that serve one purpose … launchpad platforms for missiles as directed by central/regional/local command to targets identified by a multilayered network of sensors covering the whole region. Most low cost Drones won’t need speed nor much avionics except communication and navigation. Communication includes from satellite, air and surface in both laser, and EM. It will also include designed workarounds/secondary systems to provide graceful degradation when some parts of the K chain are broken.

[@couldnotfindcoolname]

Basically an f 35 without the vtol stuff and dual engine. Looks like they tried making an F 22 using the f35 technical data they stole.

[@恶魔巫师-y4f]

美国应该立即解雇CIA FBI这两大饭桶机构，因为中国很容易窃取美国各种各样的军事技术，甚至是制造时光机窃取美国未来的科技

[@恶魔巫师-y4f]

号称全世界最强大的美国在中国面前就像一个废物白痴，因为美国的网络系统很容易被中国黑客窃取军事技术，所以美国这个废物国家在世界贸易领域无法与中国竞争，在工业领域被中国碾压，现在美国的军事技术全部被中国轻松窃取，美国有什么资格挑战中国？

[@yanghe839]

when you make a machine and try to perfect it according to Physics law, you end up 'copying' other machines that made for the same purpose, but trust me even 'copying' is difficult

[@pawelhuszcza9611]

F35A also doesn't have vtol

[@couldnotfindcoolname]

@pawelhuszcza9611 yea but it shares the same frame, same shape. Its lighter then the other's but its still fat. Still one engine.

[@ciaochao383]

Little Intel, most guess works. Learn Chinese. There is tons of information available

[@Ballacha]

@@ciaochao383 learn English. There’s a ton of difference between information and propaganda.

[@bobsmith3983]

@@Ballacha Yes USA full of propaganda. CNN, ABC, CBS, CNBC, White House, etc..

[@ciaochao383]

@Ballacha The advantage of having state owned media is that you learn to differentiate information and propaganda easily. I doubt people in the west actually have that skill. LOL

[@DaytimeAppointment]

China's annual steel output is 50 times that of Japan and 1.5 times the total output of other countries in the world. Its warship shipbuilding capacity is 100 times that of Japan and twice the total output of other countries in the world. Its drone production capacity is 1,000 times that of Japan, and combat robots have already been deployed. This is without the participation of China's major private industry giants.

[@potatolard9643]

Lol bake me some cookies

[@瀬尾結月瀬尾結月]

​@@potatolard9643What do you mean?

[@kg2005USMC]

FOAFO

[@Bk6346]

@@potatolard9643China out produces the G7 countries combined in manufacturing.

[@potatolard9643]

@@Bk6346 only according to CCP data lol

[@feomathardra]

I don't know about the specs but i like looks of f35s with two engines at china side.

[@万花筒-y6l]

颜值就是战斗力

[@TommyTarkov]

bro cant even develop own names like F-22 and J-20 or F-35 and J-35 like camon guys get some dignity

[@TheZachary86]

Lol I love how people are losing their shit about copying as a way to cope about a level playing field. Advantage wipe!

[@leotravel85]

China has no dignity

[@KingSlayerTTV]

@@TheZachary86you act like they can compete even if the aircraft was even it’s support aircraft are not even close it would die to an amraam guided by a damn AWACS

[@easonhuang7117]

As we know, 22=20. 🤣🤣

[@ViolentCabbage-ym7ko]

@@KingSlayerTTV BVR has an accuracy of only 34%, most of the kills from missiles are done via WVR which is around 67%. Furthermore, it's difficult to fire BVR missiles when the targets are unknown on radar as it could be allies or civilian planes like the tragic incident of Iranian flight 665 which was shot down by US SAM.

[@taklai2390]

😂 Chinese J20 is the kill system people need to be aware of. J35 is a less capable export version of the full production J20.💪

[@Matthew-is7zs]

The underestimation of China has come to light

[@Yung_pindakaas]

i mean they have a couple prototype J-35 that wont enter service for years. Over 1000+ F-35s have already been produced.

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

@@Yung_pindakaas China has 300+ J-20 deployed, ready for war right at this moment and hundreds of stealth drone to support back the rest of their air-force. Meanwhile USA only have 600+ F-35 for it's own air-force and other units were exported to other allied nations. While USA lacks sufficient support structure, air bases and resources to deploy every F-35 it has near China. China has all of it's jets deployed...well...in China. So the odds are pretty bad for the USA, especially when North Korea and Russia are around that region too. Taiwan is toast, just admit it already.

[@kinwaisiu9414]

J35: Maximum thrust: 11(some say 12) Maximum take-off weight: 35tons Thrust-to-weight-Ratio: 1.26 Maximum speed: Mach 2.2 Combat radius: 1350km Radar cross section: 0.01m2 Radar: Gallium nitride Bomb load: 8 tons Weapon Bay:PL-15 with 400km target range. F35: Maximum thrust: 9 Maximum take-off weight: 32tons Thrust-to-weight-Ratio: 0.87 Maximum speed: Mach 1.6 Combat radius: 1160km Radar cross section: 0.5m2 Radar: AESA Bomb load: 7 tons Weapon Bay:AIM120D with 160km target range.

[@liamspencer4941]

Claimed, plus the J-35 has a bigger radar cross section.

[@liamspencer4941]

You are also comparing a medium ranged missile to a long ranged missile which is hardly a fair comparison, the max range of a PL-15 is 300km not 400 and the max the AIM-120 AMRAAM is able to go is 180km.

[@kinwaisiu9414]

@@liamspencer4941 PL-15 can hit target ranged 400km.

[@kinwaisiu9414]

@@liamspencer4941 No, it doesn't; J35 is the stealthiest 5 th gen fighter jet; 25x stealthiest than F35

[@OfficialDoggyYT]

Exactly

[@peteryang4422]

Copy of F35. The realty is they have enough engineering ability to copy it and let it work, hopefully. The key is engineering ability. Not everyone knows how to copy a complicated engineering product.

[@johniiiix]

😂😂Copying is now signature of China's power. Its like stealing the weapons of your enemy. Really? Is that a new super power? They don't have dignity as a super power always copying and not making original weapons.

[@TXT-im7dn]

​@@johniiiix even your land are stolen 😅

[@dcc70]

If China's military is an X-Men universe character, it would be Mystique