Рет қаралды 2,289
In Re Canavan and Re Gallagher, the High Court of Australia decided an exception to the application of section 44(i) of the Constitution. The two cases concerned the qualification of members of parliament and senators who were dual citizens and did not renounce their citizenships before nomination for federal elections.
0:00 - Dual Citizenship
1:24 - Re Canavan [2017]
5:34 - Re Gallagher [2018]
// This video does not provide legal counselling or legal opinion about specific laws, matters and cases. This channel was created for educational purposes only. //
SUBSCRIBE: kzbin.info?s...
BECOME A MEMBER: / @aussielaw
*****
PLAYLISTS:
- Australian Case Law - • Australian Case Law
- Constitutional Law - • Constitutional Law
- Constitutional Provisions Explained - • Constitutional Provisi...
- Australian Government (Executive) - • Australian Government ...
- Australian Parliament - • Australian Parliament ...
*****
RELATED VIDEOS:
- Section 34 and the Qualifications of Members of Parliament - • Section 34 and the Qua...
- What happens if a Parliament Seat becomes Vacant? - • What happens if a Comm...
- Section 44: Disqualification - • Section 44: Disqualifi...
- Sykes v Cleary (1992): Holding an Office of Profit under the Crown - • Sykes v Cleary (1992):...
- How to Acquire the Australian Citizenship: Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis - • How to Acquire an AUST...
*****
RECOMMENDED READINGS:
- Australian Public Law (Appleby, Reilly and Grenfell)
*****
LINKS:
- The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act : www.legislation.gov.au/Detail...
- Sykes v Cleary : www.jade.io/article/67724
Re Gallagher : eresources.hcourt.gov.au/down...
Re Canavan : eresources.hcourt.gov.au/down...
*****
TWITTER: / renatosmcosta
ACADEMIC PROFILES:
law.uq.edu.au/profile/11028/r...
www.uq.academia.edu/RenatoSaeg...
#auslaw #australianconstitution #dualcitizenship