Random continent: We won! Somewhere in the south: sir, the penguin navy is ready.
@CoolGuyArihant3 жыл бұрын
LOL-
@datrat32383 жыл бұрын
LOL-
@dustinmorgan10953 жыл бұрын
LOL-
@dustinmorgan10953 жыл бұрын
900 IQ UNO reverse card
@dustinmorgan10953 жыл бұрын
LOL-
@dannytps83493 жыл бұрын
antartica would easily win by just charging 12 million penguins
@davidbuitelaar66593 жыл бұрын
Dont forget canadadian polar bears
@darrenwalton15873 жыл бұрын
@@davidbuitelaar6659 'canadadian'
@youraveragerobloxkid3 жыл бұрын
No, just Switzerland until a decisive victory
@Alex-ds8xm3 жыл бұрын
They would at least do very well in Australia
@bobbydarunday90033 жыл бұрын
@@KlefkiTCG there is you kid
@johannes41232 жыл бұрын
I feel like the smartest thing Europe could have done was to form an alliance with Africa early on for both to take on Asia together
@yes80322 жыл бұрын
Exactly! Africa is very useful in this situation
@imortaldragonslayer.2804 Жыл бұрын
But it was a battle royale
@MrAsifiba Жыл бұрын
It's a battle royale, there are no friends during war!.
@Meow64 Жыл бұрын
There are no friends in this bro
@Gus5903711 ай бұрын
What app and map do you use for this?
@Hydra20543 жыл бұрын
Everyone forgets Antarctica... Who secretly carries thousands of Atom bombs
@lolskoleblahyo73533 жыл бұрын
@@paridkoci9639 ur mom
@paridkoci96393 жыл бұрын
@@lolskoleblahyo7353 No honey its your mom i think 🤔
@lolskoleblahyo73533 жыл бұрын
@@paridkoci9639 no it’s ur mom
@paridkoci96393 жыл бұрын
@@lolskoleblahyo7353 Who said that
@dodo98113 жыл бұрын
lol
@robertthe19th3 жыл бұрын
I was googling "When did the USA invade ju-" and said to myself, "Oh, Vietnam" and started laughing, I'm not really sure why.
@_marsMan_3 жыл бұрын
Lol
@kazakhdude3 жыл бұрын
Invade ju what?
@_marsMan_3 жыл бұрын
@@kazakhdude jungle
@_marsMan_3 жыл бұрын
@@kazakhdude 3:25
@ChairMappingProductions3 жыл бұрын
Same
@gabrielachacon9212 жыл бұрын
All the continets except Antarctica: (fighting) Antarctica: kids these days.
@03creeperboy3 жыл бұрын
although it seems like america or asia is winning i see that europe still haves a chance due to europe being able to be strong and tactical in times of need and have a great history of colonizing, good trading and being strong in times of war
@anxieux15243 жыл бұрын
Also, the developed infrastructure, developed education, and relative unity would do them well.
@Kittykcaty3 жыл бұрын
America its just a continent so i mean south and north should be together
@03creeperboy3 жыл бұрын
i know right
@03creeperboy3 жыл бұрын
@@anxieux1524 i agree
@zsqcarii3 жыл бұрын
@@Kittykcaty its divided via panama canal
@MisVEVO3 жыл бұрын
The rather short distance from Alaska to eastern Russia was completely ignored. I see that it's not the first thing to think of with such a map but in the end, this route is shorter than the distance from South America to Africa by far and therefore certainly something to be thought of
@choxoletyo85183 жыл бұрын
People seem to underestimate how truly cold Siberia is... even if you attacked in the summer, theres no way you could cross the entire Siberian region before the next winter hits and you know what happens when you're in russia in the winter
@MisVEVO3 жыл бұрын
@@choxoletyo8518 You have a point but for one, the route could also be used the other way towards Alaska which might lead to the same situation. You seem to know the climate situation around there better than I do but it's not needed to move further towards Moskau as China, Japan and Mongolia are just below. Reaching critical spots there to regain strength over winter might be crucial to winning a fight starting from the east. The same applies for going directly south once reaching Alaska rather than fighting towards the west coast first but once again, all in respect of what's doable with the climate. I would be interested to hear your take on that
@choxoletyo85183 жыл бұрын
@@MisVEVO I see your point, crossing siberia into Mongolia or china is a better option rather than a full scale invasion of russia, but it depends on how well the siberian front is protected. The russian troops stationed there are specially trained to fight in cold weather so it boils down to how fast north america can advance before a: winter hits or b: reinforcements arrive from the west
@AnderEvermore3 жыл бұрын
@@choxoletyo8518 or the Russians enter North America and take out Alaska and most of the empty land in Canada quite quickly.
@D-A-A-3 жыл бұрын
The dude totally wiped out South America without a thought Brazil is one of the biggest countries on the planet, south America isn't as poor as you'd think either just major corruption,
@BURNTBOB50002 жыл бұрын
The most important part: Every country in a continent likes eachother? India and pakistan: aw hell nah
@sub-zer01893 жыл бұрын
I feel like North America would actually have a pretty good chance seeing as they had all that time to prepare and mobilize while Asia hasn’t had a break since the war broke out.
@mathiasjackson59093 жыл бұрын
Asia has such a large population I think they would have the numbers to fight the war and mobilize
@Dogboi6663 жыл бұрын
I agree
@Bradex.3 жыл бұрын
@@mathiasjackson5909 China and the US are equal in Military roughly and India has nukes too unlike Canada so Asia is stronger but they both have one thing. NUKES
@riderchallenge42503 жыл бұрын
but asia has manpower and resources
@adampaul54433 жыл бұрын
@Rohan nukes aside Asia would easily win with like half the worlds population they can easily overwhelm North America
@_somebritishguy3 жыл бұрын
You forgot Antarctica, they would win.
@yeereehee3 жыл бұрын
fax
@sakanig3 жыл бұрын
@gustav champoski AND PENGUINS SLAPPING UR BUT
@Paji_7432 жыл бұрын
Penguin army poggg
@thomas_l33192 жыл бұрын
He said he wasn’t going to add it in
@Paji_7432 жыл бұрын
@@thomas_l3319 it's been a year man it's 2023 if we want Antarctica then we will get Antarctica
@TaitHawkins2 жыл бұрын
Australia does supply about 90% of Asia's resources, and has an incredibly strong army, a lot stronger than people think. You also have to think about Papua New Guinea, Australia and New Zealand seem to really win there, even against large powers lake Japan. The Australian military is also trained for those types of climates, so I do believe that Oceania would be able to survive much longer, and if you take into account their great strategic position with all of their islands, Australia could probably beat most of Asia, especially when Asia is occupied with other fronts.
@scp049leplaguedocter32 жыл бұрын
they have smol army
@Hy-phenn Жыл бұрын
Only chinese front and central is occupied. India Japan South Korea and many more have armies unoccupied.
@lachomeister__6896 Жыл бұрын
Agreed australia is this 16th most militarised country in the world
@bigbird2974 Жыл бұрын
@@scp049leplaguedocter3stop being dumb it's army is pretty good not the best but it's 16th on leaderboard
@Gus5903711 ай бұрын
What app and map do you use for this?
@parabolaaaaa49193 жыл бұрын
this would be better with alliances between continents and tension within continents
@urdailyfirecook10733 жыл бұрын
Yes
@cat_the_real3 жыл бұрын
True
@modest63663 жыл бұрын
yea but then you'd have an allience of north america and europe, oceania and since south africa is in africa africa, and at that point it would basically be every other continent versus asia
@Liam-zo4jm3 жыл бұрын
But then it would just turn into real life, its already basically NA, EU, OCE vs ASIA, and then Africa just does it's own thing. Alliances would just make this a realistic war that will eventually happen in real life.
@urdailyfirecook10733 жыл бұрын
@@Liam-zo4jm smart..
@smithys_exploration3 жыл бұрын
2:34 Russia invaded itself technically once before in real life
@zanderroullo92973 жыл бұрын
Soviet onion vs russian empire (Russia). (Russia)
@zanderroullo92973 жыл бұрын
Yes
@theaeroflyexperience22332 жыл бұрын
That is called a civil war/revolution , when the people are against the military and government
@themanwhoisaman6352 жыл бұрын
@@zanderroullo9297 s o v i et o n i o n
@jillianklassen1172 ай бұрын
@@zanderroullo9297Soviet onion 💀
@siddukallem96282 жыл бұрын
If I had this guy in my geography class…
@ambush-kr4dk Жыл бұрын
If he was the teacher we would have war debates every day 😂
@alphahawk32510 ай бұрын
I mean it'd be nice my current geography teacher thought Malaysia was part of Indonesia sooooo not the best geographer
@JoeKeogh-j8s8 ай бұрын
I would really like someone else in my class who likes geography as much as me
@alphahawk3258 ай бұрын
@@JoeKeogh-j8s ikr same
@f.b.i78173 жыл бұрын
Africa be like : why u bully me
@vitaminprotein68783 жыл бұрын
Italy: bcoz we are superior Ethiopia: what did you say Italy: I mean...you know
@sponge74643 жыл бұрын
They're used to it
@unrealgammer28713 жыл бұрын
I feel like he undermined Africa's true potential Africa has been getting realy stronk over the past decades it realy isn't the poor continent everybody thinks if is.
@unrealgammer28713 жыл бұрын
@Shaggy Maluze and Europeans had superior weaponry whish I have to say is pretty impressive
@Gyughghuvugvjhvg Жыл бұрын
Malta: wdym?
@MrOoYT3 жыл бұрын
“Russia continues to invade itself” *has flashbacks*
@Danymok3 жыл бұрын
Watching this video reminded me about how much of a virgin I am. This still was an interesting video, but that thought ceme to my mind...
@pegfingers3 жыл бұрын
we know
@seaniverson7870 Жыл бұрын
e
@kazakhdude3 жыл бұрын
Europe will win. They have Finland. They just say perkele and they automatically win.
@floridamanvergilfromaltern9383 жыл бұрын
yeah they have Switzerland for no reason too but wait Asia have Vietnam hmmm the fight gonna be intense
not many ppl are taking Australia/Oceania into account bc Australia has a stronger military then Indonesia and is isolated by and easy to protect body of water with only one face for invasion to come from which si the north, oceania would still lose but they would put up a pretty good fight because Australia gives china most of the coal china has and if Australia stops china will start to struggle a lot bc china is reliant on Australia and chinas power is all reliant on coal which Australia supplies them with aswell as many other resources, ultimately Australia will lose but the will probably push pretty far into asia
@keirajames35063 жыл бұрын
Thank-you. I was looking for a comment like that!
@neonoone46883 жыл бұрын
He put Papua New Guinea as one country the left side is part of Indonesia I don't think you talk too much consideration with terrain in geography
@uuw_3 жыл бұрын
yeah maybe, but indonesia does have like 300million people, the whole of Oceania has like 40mil. It is a possibility though
@hiimyou44323 жыл бұрын
not to mention that it would be near impossible to invade the outback and Australia could launch guerrilla campaigns
@SAMURAI-di2bn2 жыл бұрын
You forgot Indonesia has malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and other's on its back.
@Chaseleep2 жыл бұрын
Power scale :1 asia 2: North America 3: Europe 4: South America 5: Africa 6: oceania
@pepsi_gaming24 ай бұрын
7:antarctica
@maxmazing33403 жыл бұрын
It would be cool if Europe and North America Join together to defeat Asia
@PBandShayne3 жыл бұрын
I would be easier for Asia to destroy itself then when they're weak enough then send in America to deal the finishing blow. America would probably defeat Europe before going to Asia.
@canadaball39733 жыл бұрын
There is a chance of that happening because a lot of North American and European countries have good relationships with each other and it would be hard for aisa to countrol all the land they have
@helloto31593 жыл бұрын
And that would be a Racist Leauge
@TvConfusionn3 жыл бұрын
@@helloto3159 what
@muhammadfaranbindastageer37353 жыл бұрын
ACTUALLY I believe Asia can defeat both of them together lmao
@breloomation88343 жыл бұрын
What do you use to make these videos, like what drawing software do you use?
@aganaziri911615 күн бұрын
The 3 continents:wohoo! we won let's go baby!! antartica:sir the penguin navy and aircraft is ready to charge
@DaviesT3983 жыл бұрын
As a European I have to admit that Asia would win
@cp122983 жыл бұрын
He is showing that Russia is literally with the west LMAO? They are with NATO? Just imagine... Russia will surely try to crush the NATO countries
@_casanova3 жыл бұрын
@@cp12298 I still don't see why people call Europe and the Americas, the "West." The earth is round, so that means since I am in America, Asia is the west. Technology has improved greatly and is shared around the world meaning no one really has a technological advantage like before which is why the term, "west" came to be.
@riderchallenge42503 жыл бұрын
@@_casanova that countries themselves wanted them to be called west as developed countries. They are new that is why. East is India and China which are old. And also today are developing countries.
@riderchallenge42503 жыл бұрын
@@_casanova and Australia and NZ are also called as the west bcz of politics even though they are not in west geographically.
@_casanova3 жыл бұрын
@@riderchallenge4250 I already explained why we shouldn't be called west anymore. We don't have technological superiority and sure as hell don't have population superiority. Your logic is also flawed, the east is new? Are you meaning as countries or culture, because way I see it, culture defines a country, and culture has been in the east since like the beginning of mankind.
@awesomeoakwood10683 жыл бұрын
Your videos are really well done and entertaining!! Thanks!!
@IS33-n5w Жыл бұрын
13:12 greenland: hi hi penguin no1 how are you? Antarctic: oh, just chillaxing here Greenland:????? Antarctic: why are you saying??? Huh penguin no 2? Greenland: cause theres a hell of a war going on penguin no1 Antarctic: relly? Greenland: yea
@ImCyberian Жыл бұрын
lol
@tomaattiX3 жыл бұрын
I like how the Americas are just having Their own little battle for half of the video
@raler64983 жыл бұрын
I may be biased as an Asian but: 1)Asia isn't going to be low on manpower and resources. Most of the resources (etc. oil in middle east) and people (etc. china, India) on Earth are on Asia 2)India, China, Vietnam, North Korea and South Korea's militaries are comparable to the USA. What were their militaries doing this entire time apart from a short time in Russia? 3)Europe doesn't have that large a military - Vietnam and North Korea could beat the entire continent together as long as they had economical support from China, Japan or South Korea 4)Indonesia isn't weak - it can defeat Oceania by itself if it also had some economical support. 5)Japan is rich. Did they also sit out the war? 6)North America would have either attacked or been attacked by East Asia as soon as South America collapsed 7)Africa isn't that weak. It still has comparable military size or probably larger than Europe (Europe would still win though since it is so wealthy) 8)You forgot Antarctica with it's army of penguins and Atom bombs. No country nor continent could beat them. My point of view of the continents are: Europe and Oceania are rich but not very militarised, The Americas are moderately rich and militarised, Africa is poor and not very militarised and Asia is Rich and very militarised. Different parts of Asia vary so when the war first starts, they will be on the losing end. However, when the powerful parts of Asia join in, they will definitely be winning.
@thomasbrennan10383 жыл бұрын
@Kaushal Acharya a united Europe along with North America could topple Asia, it’s not even a question.
@olp38503 жыл бұрын
I doubt north America would attack Asia immediately after taking over south America because taking over South America must have been costly for North America. I think they after conquering south would just go on the defensive.
@eminem29552 жыл бұрын
I doubt Vietnam and NK could defeat Europe we Russians and Das deutsche Volk würde niemals kapitulieren are hard to beat and Indonesia would crumble if they attacked Oceania and North America would not be in trouble from east Asia because we would have nuestros hermanos y hermanas centro y sudamericanos es posible que nos superen en número, pero le daremos una proporción de 10 contra 1 good day sir I speak my languages and leave
@Thirzy3 жыл бұрын
there is no way north America would take south America that quick getting through jungle and mountains not to mention the cold
@jjwh3 жыл бұрын
Nah, it would be quicker - in reality, they would just capitulate rather than fight a hopeless war. There is nothing they could feasibly do.
@jjhbcgaming9113 жыл бұрын
Thats why they go for the coast, they learned from Vietnam about terrain lol
@federicococo81862 жыл бұрын
In reality the only government that would fight the US is Venezuela, all the other countries probably would just hide their militia on difficult terrain for when the us is stretched thin. Latinoamerica is a very proud culture and we have a history of fighting better from within in our land than formal war. Probably that`s one reason the US never invaded any Lat. country, just coerced them.
@YeetTheDuck2 жыл бұрын
south america? cold? after the rest of south america is taken, chile, the andes mountain country, will surrender.
@Thirzy2 жыл бұрын
@@jjhbcgaming911 lol
@Yacbros.productions3 жыл бұрын
Him: asia starts to push into somaliland. Somalians: what was that last part?
@joeyready33 жыл бұрын
Africa: I am dead
@hammerofjustice38653 жыл бұрын
I think you should make a sequel to this video with North America fighting Asia. Sounds interesting.
@cat_the_real3 жыл бұрын
Good idea
@chosenone84563 жыл бұрын
Plz do
@mariotheundying3 жыл бұрын
@Rohan hear me out, nuclear bombs
@BlueFish053 жыл бұрын
Asia is much stronger....
@iranianintelligenceagency93373 жыл бұрын
If we don't count nukes I'd think Asia would win. Russia and China combined have to ground force to handle America, and I'm fairly sure China+Taiwan+Japan+South Korea+Russia+India not to mention Pakistan and Saudi Arabia's navies will be able to reach US shores, where they'll be able to win. And obviously no other country has a chance.
@dinopro7593 ай бұрын
Almost 1 mil, congrats adizz.
@frenchempireballmapper53633 жыл бұрын
Clicked faster than Addiz Pro Uploading The video!
@boschhotpointfan83543 жыл бұрын
Me seeing Switzerland in war: *Wait, that’s illegal.*
@Broomy1003_real2 жыл бұрын
Antartica be watching the chaos while eating popcorn.
@thanksthanks3883 жыл бұрын
I think Asia would maybe be able to invade Europe and Africa but I don’t think a invasion on North America could be possible. If they did invade from South America they would probably get locked in a stalemate at some point.
@tragicfalls31153 жыл бұрын
Promise you this africa could easily take europe
@WeatherDude7103 жыл бұрын
They probably get locked up near the middle of Mexico or south Mexico
@ericktellez76323 жыл бұрын
@@WeatherDude710 I can see them using the tried and trustworthy method of invading from the gulf of Mexico in the port of Veracruz but that would be it, the US can then entrap them by using Cuba Florida and Yucatan to create an embargo, which will leave the invading army without supplies
@WeatherDude7103 жыл бұрын
@@ericktellez7632 I see what you are thinking… I like your opinion on what would happen
@g.schauhan69033 жыл бұрын
@@tragicfalls3115 Maybe till the Iberian peninsula but I dont think they can defeat the French. No offense brother..
@blackbasilm93263 жыл бұрын
Amazing video, only surprising thing was that the joined America's (NA) didnt invade the weak Kamchatka area of russia and use its western front to invade easter asia which has probably most of its troops in the Euro/African front. If this were the case, Asia could be fighting a major war on two fronts and collapse under the two superpowers... Europe's invasion of asia would let Africa regain control of its previously occupied land (although after the probable fall of Asia it would succome to Europe or America) I see that the probable outcome would be a multi-front war between Europe and North America.
@ZiataYTofficial2 жыл бұрын
What App are you using to make this video? Just curious. Anyways, very entertaining as always.
@SasukeUchiha-ks3rz2 жыл бұрын
Have u found out?
@m.r.h56442 жыл бұрын
@@SasukeUchiha-ks3rz did u find?
@H1ydra3 жыл бұрын
i was expecting some countries suceeding from their 'alliances' to make it interesting
@anomaly61943 жыл бұрын
its a battle royale but ok
@Centaurz233 жыл бұрын
Seceding*
@randompersonl3 жыл бұрын
@@Centaurz23 im sure ur wrong
@Centaurz233 жыл бұрын
@@randompersonl i’m* you’re*
@randompersonl3 жыл бұрын
@@Centaurz23 oh i noticed the error
@Ludovicus17693 жыл бұрын
Well if we look at it realistically Europe actually has a chance, it is way more unified than the other two continents and has better infrastructure, not to mention that both North America and Asia have entire continents that aren’t their own and they would probably start rebelling creating more fronts. This would of course also happen to Europe once they take more land and because of that this would probably just be like 1984.
@TiagoOrange3 жыл бұрын
Nah Europe wouldn’t last long. They control Russia which is their main exporter of fuel and natural gas. they can just stop exports of fuel and then wait them out
@Ludovicus17693 жыл бұрын
@@TiagoOrange Did you even read a word I said?
@TiagoOrange3 жыл бұрын
@@Ludovicus1769 yes I did. Doesn’t matter if Europe is unified and has better infrastructure, no fuel for them would crumble their continent. America is more in danger then asia of having rebellions, because all Asia controls is Oceania which is very small and has pretty much no threat to Asia as they can quickly get it under control, and a bit of Africa which is no big deal, even if they try to start rebellion they can just stop focusing there and put some effort into the choke point between Africa and Asia in egypt by the Red Sea as most of Africa has very little army and navy so they couldn’t try anything big. Then asia let’s Europe into chaos because of the fuel and taunt them to force them to scramble their jets and stuff only to run away causing Europe to lose more of their remaining fuel. and after a while when they are crippled, they attack and take them over. North America is in a much harder place, as they control South America which is a bigger and stronger continent so they have to put more more effort into it, and then for their African colonies they also try to rebel but they couldn’t really do anything as they are almost primitive compared to an army like the USAs.
@Ludovicus17693 жыл бұрын
@@TiagoOrange So since you read my comment you realise that unity wasn’t actually my main point and instead it was simple warfare, larger borders to defend means having to use more troops, Europe would easily be able to push thru and the cycle will repeat. As I said it would just become a 1984 scenario, no matter the fuel. Sure Europe would be missing it for some days, but with Asia’s borders getting bigger Europe would easily be able to push thru and get to the fuel. I usually have to make long comments explaining my point, but this is so simple I don’t understand how you can’t get it.
@dodotikkhenk33783 жыл бұрын
@@Ludovicus1769 lol infrastructure ?what infrastructure u talking bout.What use of it in wars?
@ediemucoj11502 жыл бұрын
Me:adizz how much well you underpower EUROPE. Adizz:yes
@gunter17913 жыл бұрын
May I ask, what program you are using to paint the maps?
@snek_boi4202 жыл бұрын
Idk
@Night_77_F77773 жыл бұрын
The reason for Asia's victory is because Asia has a variety of terrain that some countries specialize in like South East Asia: Jungle, Middle East: Desert and then North? South Asia: Snow and then im pretty sure every nation can moblize into normal terrain. Another reason is Asia's resources, Central Asia, Russia, China etc. (tbh idk why you thought Asia would run out of resources) and then you look at Asia's man power, look at the population, does it need explanation? Asia is better than both continents in so many ways, I cannot see which continent can live again the Asians.
@Night_77_F77773 жыл бұрын
@H25JB9 im quite sure that the under developedness does not matter when there would be other nations helping you in your continent.
@rampage46953 жыл бұрын
@H25JB9 well 90% of countries in Asia is upper middle income or high income country and only 9% of the population lived in poverty compared to south america with more than 27% and Africa with 45%.Asia is the fastest growing continent in the world I know you never been to Asia ones😂😂
@FadedX3123 жыл бұрын
@H25JB9 China japan and Korea is good enough
@onejumpman46473 жыл бұрын
@@FadedX312 so your saying korea, china and japan can take on, russia,usa,uk,canada,france,indonesia,Australia, germany and poland and many more and russia would fight on European cause for some reason they consider them selves european i found this out when i searched up *is russia and usa allies*
@FadedX3123 жыл бұрын
@@onejumpman4647 only usa and germany are actually advanced. Uk and France is alright. Russia is asia/Europe so that doesn't count. Lemme ask how is Indonesia and Australia advanced?
@prestonangel4482 жыл бұрын
"Every Continent is going to war" Georgia, Russia, Turkey, France, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Cyprus etc: *Confused Confusing Confusion*
@Gaysexproductions9 ай бұрын
Why is France there????
@ChristIsKing4ever-l9w7 ай бұрын
@@GaysexproductionsFrench guinea, which is in south america
@Pizzaproductions1234 ай бұрын
They had their different continent counterparts
@FoxEye20233 жыл бұрын
i feel like Asia wins in Europe and Africa, but landing a invasion on the America's would be near impossible
@Joseph-dw8qc3 жыл бұрын
Not impossible but both continent would get high casualties
@Mr_Sakul3 жыл бұрын
The invasion would most likely be pretty easy. Invading already war torn South America and pushing north. The most difficult situation would probably be the logistical issues.
@olsenfernandes36343 жыл бұрын
Not at all, high tech weapons isn't as easily manufactured so it will end the same as Germany Vs USSR. The difference in numbers is huge.
@ericktellez76323 жыл бұрын
@@Mr_Sakul South America? Why, if their main goal is to reach the US starting from south america would make it incredibly hard just from the distance alone. I think it would be better to start with the Caribbean, like Haiti or Cuba.
@Mr_Sakul3 жыл бұрын
@@ericktellez7632 ofc one landing zone wouldn't be enough but one of the reasons is because it's far from US main core and the region is already war torn so it would be easier to invade and establish your presence there.
@noid787873 жыл бұрын
Asia Has 60% of worlds population so i predict Asia will win
@najibrahal45173 жыл бұрын
its 60% not 30%
@ruchikapandey68363 жыл бұрын
@@najibrahal4517 Yeah you are right
@Faris-FFSS3 жыл бұрын
its actually 60% of the worlds population
@noid787873 жыл бұрын
@@Faris-FFSS oh yeah i ment to type that
@Nightlight163 жыл бұрын
Population is not everything. Europe could invade Africa easily But Africa is PACKED with people.
@robloxbacon44722 жыл бұрын
What Website or app are you using?
@utexashorns05423 жыл бұрын
At the point we are at, America has a high chance of getting close considering the amount of land they have
@abhilas91123 жыл бұрын
Most of its all frozen and barely liveable, I’m talking about Canada
@eduardpeeterlemming3 жыл бұрын
How to be good colonizer: 1st colonize a place and 2nd you take every possible natural resource and for 3rd you leave
@eamonahern74953 жыл бұрын
Fourth break up the people and territories into political factions to encourage in fighting so they can't become strong and invade in revenge.
@goldenkiwi75593 жыл бұрын
5th: Be surprised when they don't like you.
@eduardpeeterlemming3 жыл бұрын
6th: recolonize them
@lfcfan283 жыл бұрын
7th: rinse and repeat
@I_hu85ghjo3 жыл бұрын
@@lfcfan28 but this time do it and let the people of your nation think that you're liberating the country
@Kosmicgamers3 ай бұрын
a continent wins Meanwhile in antartica : child’s play
@escapefr0mslender3 жыл бұрын
Ethiopia is known for having very strong fighters so they would be helping Africa a lot and since Morocco and Ethiopia have good relations Morocco wouldn’t be taken so easily
@jasonmaltezos29963 жыл бұрын
Γεια
@AvatarStudioss3 жыл бұрын
Exactly this guy is being offensive
@the7th7503 жыл бұрын
7:55 you’re forgetting about the area in the southernish parts of the Ural Mountains between Perm and Yekaterinburg which links the Russian plain and West Siberian plain, this would prevent a likely stalemate as either sides could traverse this area into the other continent
@hoppschwiizwmundem Жыл бұрын
what app dp you use to make these videos? and whats the map that you use? i also want to make mapping videos
@rodrigomechetti75683 жыл бұрын
I knew right at the start that north america would win against south america but i liked that you made it actually quite hard the war it makes the video more interesting.
@heitorhyuga45343 жыл бұрын
North and south América is one continent
@jedilordlog85433 жыл бұрын
@@heitorhyuga4534 That was until Theodore Roosevelt came along.
@fayhaaheed38897 ай бұрын
Antarctica:sir the penguin navy is ready
@Chill546762 жыл бұрын
what are you using to make this video?
@levbegus1873 жыл бұрын
This in the early 20th century would be a breeze
@zacianhero90973 жыл бұрын
Knowing that the enemies probably know that America is low on man power, this would probably give America a chance to surprise attack from Alaska to Asia. Asia hasn't caught a break. Meaning that they will soon run out of energy. Leaving America with a BIG chance to take over most of the land. This would leave Europe surrounded. They just might surrender. America will have won the war in the end. Antarctica would be quite easy to conquer too.
@turnerlost14282 жыл бұрын
3:28 Vietnam be watching like “ALL WENT ACCORDING TO PLAN”!!
@Yacbros.productions3 жыл бұрын
(This is a little bit of usa bias but) I think North America would win, mostly because they have the Atlantic between them and Europe and the pacific between them and Asia, so if they control those oceans, there safe and can make landings on Beijing, Tokyo, Lisbon, Copenhagen, etc.
@_marsMan_3 жыл бұрын
Possibly but North America is carried by the US and Canada. Asia has more than 2 billion troops. Europe has the weapons, men, and stability
@pizza_113 жыл бұрын
Yeah but asia has China, Russia, India, The Middle East, Japan, which together would be very strong. Edit: Forgot about the European Russia
@mehmetemincoban84993 жыл бұрын
It's not that easy to do landings you know,this is not like D-Day,you are saying a whole continent with more than 4.5 billion people.
@yolk68673 жыл бұрын
@@pizza_11 they would be strong but their navies are currently weaker then the US's
@crazywarriorscatfan90613 жыл бұрын
I'd say Europe would put up a huge fight, but would ultimately lose to Asia. I'm not sure who would win between NA and Asia. I think Africa would become the main battleground because neither side would risk amphibious assaults until later.
@g.schauhan69033 жыл бұрын
@European Socialist Union true
@uuw_3 жыл бұрын
@European Socialist Union yeah its definitely a major possibly, although due to the massive fight between europe and asia i feel like asia would lose alot of resources. which might hinder there performance against n America
@kakaibakaonlol31632 жыл бұрын
asia has india and china
@user-hr1uw4cj2z2 жыл бұрын
@@kakaibakaonlol3163 Russia has more nukes than whole asia
@Khiyoken2 жыл бұрын
@@user-hr1uw4cj2z the number of nukes doesn't matter both can still end humanity and this is a war without nukes
@A-90_ahhh Жыл бұрын
Can you please tell me what app that is? 2:16
@BleedRed-eo3zn3 ай бұрын
Its paint. X its only on pc or windows
@Bobuxbaconyt2 ай бұрын
Microsoft paint
@bread_boy_gaming30683 жыл бұрын
asia africa and europe: *fighting a lot* north america: *eats popcorn*
@moymo61253 жыл бұрын
Europe is the most developed and richest continent, and I believe with its strong history of it put aside its arguements it would make a powerful and unstoppable team
@ericktellez76323 жыл бұрын
The US has more than enough Nukes for every capital in Europe 🤷♂️
@hrishabkumarsharma13553 жыл бұрын
Asia has wayyy to many people. If history is any indication smaller more technologically advanced countries lose to larger armies
@moymo61253 жыл бұрын
@@ericktellez7632 if europe United then it would have more money , population and spending than america. Then the nukes wouldn’t really be a problem, america is basically a bunch of inited countries anyways like what Europe would be just shit and not take care of it’s citizens
@moymo61253 жыл бұрын
@@hrishabkumarsharma1355 Russia CS Great Britain. Russia Vs France , China vs Great Britain, India Vs Great Britain . India vs France , Spain vs morroco . Canada / Great Britain vs america (war of 1812) and much more All the victors where the smaller countries, and that’s only the two countries I know history from
@hrishabkumarsharma13553 жыл бұрын
@@moymo6125 Russia vs France , Russia won because of the winter and Napolean used troops from all over Europe in his invasion of Russia to specifically balence out numbers,india vs gb isn't comparable since india wasn't a unified entity and many indian states allied themselves with the British. The British conquest of India was paradoxical that way since it was more about timing because technology wise both sides were about the same but the Brits recruited millions of indians to fight for them. But all this is useless anyway since today India and China have more firepower and military hardware than France , gb and Germany. Europe has essentially no power projection in Asia, in Africa maybe but not Asia.
@mrtophat_junkbot8 ай бұрын
Antarcticans: Sir, are you sure to launch the penguin airstrike? The penguin government: Yes, it’s kaboom time.
@ArkansasMapping3 жыл бұрын
Prediction 1. Asia 2. North America 3. Europe 4. Africa 5. Oceania 6. South America
@generalgrenade64633 жыл бұрын
Right Africa beats na and Europe?
@pomagranitz7013 жыл бұрын
@FAIZ DAYAN Yea, but a lot of that manpower is "unfit" for fighting. Also the bad infrastructure makes organization hard and the outdated weaponry is a real slow down. Also Europe has 750 million people, and North America has 370 million people.
@ArkansasMapping3 жыл бұрын
@FAIZ DAYAN and ethiopia
@majorhommy3 жыл бұрын
@FAIZ DAYAN dude... When two countries on the continent have needed weapons and equipment, and the others are poor as hell, then they'll absolutely lose the war between the high developed Europe or north America. Remember that Europe colonized all Africa some time ago. Man power isn't that important in the war as you think.
@pomagranitz7013 жыл бұрын
@FAIZ DAYAN Almost everywhere accept like 4 developed African nations is an under developed, corrupt nation.
@nugget30023 жыл бұрын
North America Would get close to winning with taking most of Asia but eventually the war will make both continents low on war resources and troops so then Asia with their major population would win
@rkpyi86163 жыл бұрын
Asia also have more resouces...
@onejumpman46473 жыл бұрын
@@rkpyi8616 how?
@Tanghulu_masterr3 жыл бұрын
@@onejumpman4647 Well Asia has a bigger landmass compared to North America so bigger landmass means more resources.
@Yiorgos409 Жыл бұрын
True but North America has huge amounts of money and equipment-its navy could easily blockade Asia's and Asia is far less unified than North America or Europe and in a realistic scenario would collapse faster than any other continent aside from maybe africa due to rebellions
@SomebodySharp3 ай бұрын
@@onejumpman4647Middle East is in Asia
@anamonteiro11735 ай бұрын
@AdizzPro Amazing channel! You make amazing videos, and I bet you think lots and put lots of planning and work into it! Also, I really want to do those sims like you, but I don't know what the website or app I need to do that is. Pls tell me what app/website you use? :)
@ethanharrison3363 жыл бұрын
The thing is europe has Britain and Germany and Switzerland. And Britain would never give up and probably be a pain in the ass to teeter an invasion against. Let alone the fact that America would conquer all of the resources that were readily available in the south and would lose middle eastern oil trade as a result of this war. A lot of factors would come into play but it would be a lot easier for America to hold its land then europe or Asia fr. There would almost always be a resistance.
@paflamenace65133 жыл бұрын
Strongest army in Europe si France...
@salemkitty57863 жыл бұрын
The USA also has a whole lot of oil of themselves. It’s scary to think we’ve never seen the USA at nearly its full power
@JJaqn053 жыл бұрын
@@salemkitty5786 Yes we have. And it wasn't that impressive. Russia could obliterate the US into small pieces if it wanted to. The UK could destroy all of North America if they wanted to. America could destroy Western Europe if they wanted to.
@AleksandraSudobina3 жыл бұрын
@@salemkitty5786 remember tsar bomb? Yea, about that...
@yourdaildoseofnothing65543 жыл бұрын
@@JJaqn05 no your absolutely wrong
@carycole-anthony57873 жыл бұрын
how do youget the map and draw on it?
@charles_not_found77382 жыл бұрын
The thumbnail: Philippines, East malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Indonesia, East timor: Well, we dont exist.
@kingston21953 жыл бұрын
The one error that I spotted was that the Canary Islands started off the war as part of "Africa" when they are actually spanish islands belonging to Europe
@sportsdorkzproductions94583 жыл бұрын
I think that Asia would begin to push into Europe, Taking Belarus, and Europe would sign an agreement with North America to team on Asia, with Asia being the major power.
@animedeal9 Жыл бұрын
What do you use bro and I like all of you videos and also I am one of the subscribers who likes and watches all of your videos
@centeot3 жыл бұрын
Asias got the manpower North America has the best position to be in Europe has the most skill historically taking over other places This is stalemate
@TiagoOrange3 жыл бұрын
Europe wouldn’t last. Without Russia’s exports of oil and natural gas, I’m surprised if they even made it this far
@amdinru33 жыл бұрын
what website/app do you use for painting? I was wondering so I could maybe use it sometime. Edit: I love how he said ‘The small Australian army” when Australia is ranked 19 out of the 140 countries that has an active army, so it’s kinda unrealistic that Indonesia would successfully capitulate the country.
@tallerstond81053 жыл бұрын
Australia has literally 12 times less people lol?
@Barack_Obama_Gayming3 жыл бұрын
There are 197 countries
@notblank70143 жыл бұрын
Wondering the same thing lol
@dwaynethewokjohnson77733 жыл бұрын
fr tho what he using pls someone help us lol help a pal in need
@SasukeUchiha-ks3rz2 жыл бұрын
@@dwaynethewokjohnson7773 u found out what he uses?
@foxychinstrappenguin87782 жыл бұрын
Asia/North America/Europe: WE WON!! Antarctica with the millions of penguin soldiers and an army of huge bombs: I'm about to end this whole man's career
@Nystika3 жыл бұрын
It's all fun game til the scienctist in anartica makes godzilla
@Louisianaball-fn6ij3 жыл бұрын
Instead of saying “Russia invading itself” you could say “Russia invading Siberia”.
@Oscar928393 ай бұрын
As an Australian I can confirm we would be cooked
@meshonni77163 жыл бұрын
North america would have a strong navy they would use it to their advantade and possibly make an alliance with europe if allowed
@Timotej-c6e2 ай бұрын
People after 1M wiews ⬆️
@maddisonruby25303 ай бұрын
What app you use?
@tacke_4t2693 жыл бұрын
I mean this is just you drawing the map with minimum reasoning. It would be nice if you made one more realistic and detailed
@kristianjohnson2173 жыл бұрын
Ikr just completely ignoring geography
@hepersopon44593 жыл бұрын
From an asian perspective, I think NA and asia are interchangeable. Although asia *might* have a slight advantage due to sheer population. My list is 1. ASIA/NA 2. NA/ASIA 3. EU And the rest are irrelevant
@Carlos_Aguilarr Жыл бұрын
2:35 it’s not a weird thing to hear anymore😂😂😂
@Free_iraq Жыл бұрын
Why does everyone forget about the middle east?
@cooliocoolster123Ай бұрын
the middle east is NOT a continent, thats called a sub-continent
@MalDoesTech3 жыл бұрын
Bro north Africa easily could have invaded Spain. Do you not remember when the Europeans intruded north Africa but they couldn't handle the desert heat and the fact that north Africa has one of the best militaries in the African continent they could easily push them back.
@petesthename15883 жыл бұрын
Assuming Russia is on europes team, europe would be the most powerful land force, by quite a lot. They are up there in tech, just slightly behind NA. The second strongest land force is Asia, followed by NA. In terms of navy, North America would actually have the most powerful navy still, followed by a close matchup between Asia and Europe. Asia has more, but only really Japan and few new Chinese boats are comparible as the bulk of the Chinese and Indian navies are substantially inferior to modern western ships. Those three regions would still maintain sea superiority in their own shores for a substantial amount of time. North America is in the best position. Plentiful natural resources, large navy and extremely advanced tech. They would quickly blitz SA. Take it let resources, with very little contest from the other two contenders. Europe and Asia however would be constantly grilling it out. Japan is the important country for Asia as they have advanced tech to boost up Asia. However russias addition to europe, means that europe would punch through Asia, particularly the Middle East and Siberia. The longer the war goes on, the larger the advantage Asia gains, but NA and Europe had large initial advantages they can capitalise on. Theoretical are hard to predict, especially one like this which throws normal human nature out the window Europe would have the least natural resources, but could fairly easily move into Africa.
@g.schauhan69033 жыл бұрын
Brother I think you underestimating Asian technology. We also have Israel technologies and Indian and Chinese militaries are not that far behind...Btw about Military size I dont think any continent can match with Asia in terms of human resource and China, India, North and South Koreas hold the largest armies in the world not Russia. And the most important of all is Oil which is mostly in Eastern Africa(easily capturable) and Middle East Asia only. So yeah I dont think Asia would go down even if Europe and NA form an alliance
@petesthename15883 жыл бұрын
@@g.schauhan6903 modern wars are not won by manpower but machines. Asia definitely has population and resources, but they have significantly less tanks and aircraft. They would lose air superiority quickly, and get punctured through by modern Russian tanks
@petesthename15883 жыл бұрын
@@g.schauhan6903 if you also think that NA and Europe combined couldn’t beat Asia you are delusional on the strength of modern militaries
@krishwadhwani472 жыл бұрын
@@petesthename1588 3 months later, you realised how wrong you were. Asia would win easily.
@H1ydra3 жыл бұрын
im kinda suprised africa outlasted south america and oceania
@Hyguyboy Жыл бұрын
That is true. Aunt Artika would win because everybody would just die in because the penguins would kill them and polar bears like everything that’s in Antarctica would kill humans.
@sto81493 жыл бұрын
First
@caocotno3 жыл бұрын
No one cares
@Le-Sun3 жыл бұрын
Idc
@SmudgysCoasters3 жыл бұрын
You may have been the first commenter but I was the first viewer and it doesnt matter anyway
@arandomguy36303 жыл бұрын
@@caocotno then why are you replying if you don’t care
@maharlikamapping14293 жыл бұрын
@Luca Fortunato Gotta agree
@abcdefg-yh2cq2 жыл бұрын
I love the vids but just asking out of curiosity where are you from? You look American but I'm not sure
@robotika536Ай бұрын
Antartica: How about us?
@LearnwithMrCerveny2 жыл бұрын
What app are you using for your map?
@nordicnostalgia81062 жыл бұрын
Yeah. The continents will be aware of naval invasions. It’s not gonna take them by complete surprise. It’s super risky too and Africa for example still have to the power to repel or take back a successful landing
@katdoestuffYT2 жыл бұрын
“Indonesia has an easy time destroying the SMALL Australian Army” As an Aussie, I am offended
@frmda33302 жыл бұрын
australia is probably better than indonesia becuase of its air force