I believe that Dean Thomas would have filled Ron's role as originally the trio was meant to be a quartet with Dean Thomas
@abrown76711 ай бұрын
@austinnighteyes1900 No offense, but Neville is not the "true Chosen One". He was an option for Voldemort, yes, but ultimately Harry was the one who Voldemort went after and marked.
@emmacurran52596 ай бұрын
I will say, if Ron was killed in book 4/5, then the movie writers wouldn’t have gotten away with assassinating Ron’s character prior to book 4. They would have given him the “if you want to kill Harry you’ll have to kill us too” line and they would have had him stick up for Hermione even more. They would have had more respect for his character.
@juliangerardino16822 жыл бұрын
I mean - the resurrection of Voldemort at the end of Goblet of Fire as it stands is arguably the darkest and most horrifying scene of the entire franchise. Add to it Wormtail murdering Ron Weasely after the line "kill the spare," within the very same scene, and we are presented with a book and ongoing series that could never continue under Scholastic. The series would have attracted an entirely new audience going forward while also alienating much of its already established fanbase. Rowling made the right call by having the trio survive.
@AHufflepuffAndASwiftie Жыл бұрын
Interesting question: Without Ron, who would Harry go on the Horcrux Hunt with, assuming of course Harry let someone else in on the Hocrux secret? Just Hermione? Or would he (& Hermione) bring someone else? Neville? Ginny? Luna? Lupin? Can't be Sirius cause he's already dead . . . unless he wasn't in this scenario?? I honestly don't know, but it IS interesting to think about . . .
@RJMiller733 жыл бұрын
It was Order of the Phoenix, not Goblet of Fire. She talked about in her sit down with Radcliffe. That’s why it took her so long to write that book. I also disagree about the Weasley’s, I don’t think they would want anything to do with Harry.
@maiawatson65573 жыл бұрын
The Weasley’s knew how important he was to Ron, and at this point they’re in the order already so I don’t see them not at least coming to a semi understanding that this was always a possibility. Coming to an understanding that it was not Harry’s fault.
@Anonomius02 жыл бұрын
I think you're confusing ron's potential death with Arthur weasley's.
@RJMiller732 жыл бұрын
@@Anonomius0 No, I’m not. She said that while she was writing Order is when she thought about it.
@RJMiller732 жыл бұрын
@@maiawatson6557 An understanding that their 15 year old son could have possibly been killed? They would have still been part of the fight but still distanced themselves from Harry.
@Anonomius02 жыл бұрын
@@RJMiller73 I thought it was while writing order of the phoenix that she considered killing arthur but then decided against it because that would make ron half harry and that's why she killed sirius instead.
@juliangerardino16822 жыл бұрын
Like you said - I don't think this franchise would have been nearly as successful or as fun to read if Ron had been killed off in Goblet of Fire. We have to remember that the first three books established the series as children's novels, so while the later books certainly did get darker and presented higher stakes, none of the trio could have been killed off any sooner than the end of book 6. I think it worked out for the best that the entire trio survived.
@glassfishplays36053 жыл бұрын
I feel like killing him in the last book would give not enough time to mourn his death mabey save Dumbledore for the last book and kill Ron in the astronomy tower
@isabellakarlsson53 Жыл бұрын
It wouldn't have been a good idea for the story or the success of the it at all. Everyone loves Ron (at least those who have read the books, the movies kind of made Ron unlikeable), Harry loves Ron. And without Ron, Harry just simply can't function. Ron is his mate. And without Ron, Harry only has Hermione, who would also be in grieving along with Harry. Actually, Harry would have been in grieving the whole rest of the books. And that would have just been too angsty. So, JK Rowling not killing off Ron was an extremely good idea.
@laurahugillofficial3 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a solid story.
@breebree8200 Жыл бұрын
There is a way to ramp up tension even higher. Just have Harry fall onto the Portkey before he could get to Ron. Then, at the final battle, Voldemort is there with an Inferius made from Ron's body and Harry has to stop Inferius!Ron before he can get to the Noseless One.
@Sky1anders1922 жыл бұрын
Someone should write a fanfic about this
@joeydoesstuff2142 Жыл бұрын
I would but I haven’t read the books so it feels wrong for me to
@Allthingsasian2 жыл бұрын
If Ron died I would probably have stopped reading the books. Ron Weasley is our king 🤴
@Jana-ho9mu3 жыл бұрын
Where are the comments this is a good video
@blissfullycat02 Жыл бұрын
Ron was the heart of the group and it would have killed the momentum
@jennybalzer55732 жыл бұрын
No I love Ron Weasley I would have stopped reading Harry Potter
@saitarunikavuri14783 жыл бұрын
I think she also said that if Ron died, she would've paired Hermione and Fred up. So, we would've had an alive Fred. Anyways, I think the original plot made a lot of sense.
@RJMiller732 жыл бұрын
No, she never said that.
@superpokenate2 жыл бұрын
You’re right she never said that dunno why people think she did
@Cup1d._2 жыл бұрын
Bro am pretty sure Fred had a gf
@littlesparrow3033 жыл бұрын
I think if Ron did die then Cedric would have probably been part of the Trio. I mean we would probably get to see more of the Hufflepuff House and the members in it. I don't have an issue of Hermione X Harry ship if they did get together or Harry & Ginny getting close from Ron's death
@yaaaas97783 жыл бұрын
personally, I think it would've been Ginny. I doubt JK would've taken Cedric to be a part of the trio since he would've been introduced in the same book as Ron died. So Cedric would feel like a replacement only set up so there's a trio again, I think fans would've hated him and the books would've lost a lot of the quality they had
@RJMiller732 жыл бұрын
Cedric is three years older, how would that even work. Also, Ron would not have been replaced.
@Allthingsasian2 жыл бұрын
Personally I wouldn’t have wanted any trio at all. To replace Ron is just cheap and just dashes on his character. Ron was the perfect balance of the group. Harry relied on Ron to lighten the mood, he was his best friend, the person who showed him the Wizarding world. Hermoine loved Ron. Without Ron, Harry and Hermoine would be incomplete and if Ron died I think it should be kept that way. To feel the effects of his loss.
@ananyavishwanath15743 жыл бұрын
Can you make theories on the fantastic beast series
@SharpAsRavenClaws11 ай бұрын
0:17 what degrading comments?
@jamma.77 Жыл бұрын
Would Ron return as a ghost, though? That's something to think about.
@abrown76711 ай бұрын
I don't think he would feel a desire to stay behind. As SmartyPants said, I think that Ron would just come full circle with the "kill the spare" comment.
@emmacurran52596 ай бұрын
He would have been in the circle of the “people who loved Harry” when Harry used the resurrection stone before his sacrifice in the last book.
@Bearsona Жыл бұрын
Book 5 is the charm. Ron dieing instread of Sirius would have kicked off the war that was supposed to happened afterward in a maximum. Rowling made the mistake in Book 6 to try to get back to the "mysteries of the Book" style when the book was predestend for a training arc book. Harry being finally properly trained by Sirius and Dumbledore while learning about the Horcruxe too. Hermione evenly invested and getting closer to Harry then ever (in my version they would end up together) but may that as it be. Dumbledore still dies the way he does and marks the war as lost for the good side. Book 7 draws then a picture of the wizarding world of a Voldemort that won the war in all his horror, till Harry and the Order (with an alive Sirius with them on the hunt) emerge and kill Voldemort with more skill than and lame Expeliarmus.
@bluetuberthesecond48303 жыл бұрын
First
@a6cat1playing493 жыл бұрын
And I'm second
@meequalsbookworm30293 жыл бұрын
I didn’t love Ron honestly but Harry Potter is one of my favorite series as is so I guess I wouldn’t suggest a change
@dyland18423 жыл бұрын
Third
@bananaxoonana81313 жыл бұрын
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
@boshraalavi30412 жыл бұрын
actually, I think I would have preferred the "Ron is dead" version
@TheRealSavage05 Жыл бұрын
Why
@gilgamesh5472 жыл бұрын
I like this what if , i never like ron character anyway if this happen harry and hermione would have been together
@RJMiller732 жыл бұрын
No, they wouldn’t have.
@C0astinG4mer Жыл бұрын
@@RJMiller73 eh they probably would. I could see it
@emmacurran52596 ай бұрын
JK Rowling already complained that she didn’t put them together… so yeah. I think she would have (not that it would have been great writing)
@TaheishaLake4 ай бұрын
@@C0astinG4mer No Harry would have probally gotten with Ginny