What If Stalin and Hitler Joined Forces During WWII

[@tomw.6757]

They DID team up. Just ask Poland.

[@TootsyBootsy]

I was very confused reading the title of this video.

[@jacobc4582]

No they didn't. They had a neutrality pact, non-aggression.

[@falconeshield]

They mean without backstabbing

[@wawa8408]

​​@@jacobc4582they did. Even before 1939.

[@jacobc4582]

@wawa8408 having mutual objectives doesn't make you a team. They had no alliance and did not actively defend each other. They were simply two entities that had similar goals for a short period of time. Russians didn't come to German defense, Germans did not come to Russian defense. Being friendly isn't being an ally.

[@alexanderkidonakis9185]

If I learned anything from Germany it’s finish one nation at a time.

[@JH-ed9rp]

Thats your only takeaway? 😂

[@GiannisandIrie]

Got a global conquest planned there bud?

[@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman]

Same

[@Katkayz]

Bismarck was right , he knew how to take over win countries and win wars

[@robbiecleighmarks3088]

Um.. good luck on your endeavors?..

[@maurd]

They did at the beginning. The biggest myth is that Russia hands were all clean in this.

[@unholyiiamas]

Is that really a myth or just ignorance?

[@davidford3115]

Agreed. The Molotov-Ribbentrop Alliance, also known as the Pact of Blood is blatantly ignored by leftists who don't want to acknowledge what Eric Hoffer observed: that the Commies and the Nazis in practice pandered to the exact same group of people/.

[@Cobrax_x]

Was anyone clean?

[@mastpg]

Yeah, everyone always says how innocent Stalin was. /s

[@neilsonhans4763]

It is a joke that Putin said Russia "saved the world from the Nazis" and conveniently left out that Stalin himself initially wanted to join the Nazis to destroy the allies however it becomes one of those deal gone bad situation.

[@DB-pd9je]

Alternate title "What if Stalin remembered to say no take backs!"

[@thomashenebry8269]

Silly comment.

[@crackbloke5974]

they should especially when both where socilalists.

[@ThePope406]

​@thomashenebry8269 Well he's right. They were allied in poland.

[@johnmcnulty2705]

Another what if is what if when Germany attacked the Soviet Union from the west the Japanese attacked from the east forcing the Soviets to fight on two fronts. The outcome in Russia probably would have been different. This also would have delayed the United States from entering the war with no Pearl Harbor.

[@waltersaddler4273]

Exactly true was listening to a podcast recently that describes exactly like you are saying.

[@sargesrum6117]

Soviets already had an army ready to fight Japan and were aware of all Japanese plans due some of their most skilled espionage agents. There is some information about that to be found, an agent caught that unraveled all plans of Germany and Japan. Japan couldn't split their war effort against the allied forces in Asia (India, Australia, Britain, America and even some Dutch ships wreaking havoc) and also the soviets. Not the resources, not solid control of their newly gained territories that they had to defend from all sides and not the manpower for it. Also don't forget the many Chinese insurgents and a small army that attacked from India.

[@superdouble8834]

Japan did try before and failed terribly and never dared to do it again. If they invaded on both sides, Ussr would literally gain Manchuria for free (maybe few quadrillion deaths) and china probably would never get Manchuria back from Ussr and Cold War might be very different

[@sargesrum6117]

@@superdouble8834 very much true

[@kgb4499]

???? The Japaneses would freeze to death in Siberia ☠️☠️☠️ and Japan needed to deal with China and USA

[@bsicc]

"What if"??? You mean like they did in Poland? They were literally allies with a non-aggression pact and carved up Poland together.

[@dealtanace]

someone commented before watchin

[@VladimirPutin-p3t]

Shhhh!! The tankies dont accept that part of history.

[@danielpuran2384]

Poland will be the cause of ww2

[@mattr2626]

They weren't really allies. They really just agreed to not attack each other cause neither side wanted the smoke

[@pritidube3478]

Shh! That isn't in the script

[@solaceinrage]

I mean, they very much were partners at the start. They just turned on each other, as evil tends to do.

[@Contagious93812]

they were never partners, the whole hitler's campaign was about the danger of bolshevism, molotov-ribbentrop pact had nothing to do with partnership but non agression, which means they were enemies. friends don't sign non-agression pacts because friends don't wage wars on each other.

[@solaceinrage]

@@Contagious93812 So they just both decided to attack poland around the same time? They very much fought together. That isn't non-aggression, that is cooperation. They were allies in a common goal. Current russians find it a very bitter pill because they have to face that they are in fact projecting by calling everyone else nazis, but them's the facts.

[@Anubis437]

​@@solaceinrageYou mean evil like US who turned against Saddam Hussein after initially supporting him against Iran.

[@erertertert44]

they weren't it was purely a strategic alliance, Hitler's aim was to destroy the Jews, bolshevics and eventually the entire Slavic population inhis mission for Lebensraum for the Germanic people

[@erertertert44]

yes they collaborated in Poland but only through convenience they hated everything eachother stood for and were destined to fight. the eastern front was the real war the western front was merely a diatraction

[@caseyh1934]

How is this a 'What if'?? That is EXACTLY how it hot started

[@SEAZNDragon]

Not quite. They just agree not to fight each other and split Poland.

[@MasterFootballSoccer]

Did you watch the whole video?

[@caseyh1934]

​@@MasterFootballSoccerdon't need to. Actually studied history.

[@fox2569]

@@caseyh1934The video doesn’t talk about actual history, that’s why it’s a ‘what if’

[@jaredproffitt3720]

@@SEAZNDragondude learn history Russia actively helped take over Poland with troops and Russia lost over 250k troops trying to take over Finland

[@olegskokojevs4323]

They did team up, read the secret protocol signed together with Molotov Ribbentrop pact in 1939. In fact, Germans and USSR started the ww2 together by attacking Poland.

[@stargazer-elite]

Fun fact this was surprisingly close to happening the USSR was decently close to joining the axis Remember that the axis was never made to last just that they were all authoritarian regimes that had similar goals and they would likely go back to disliking each other after

[@davidford3115]

Indeed. More people should be aware of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Alliance, also known as the Pact of Blood to carve up Poland.

[@enginecrafter7718]

There's no way any possible alliance between those two would last. Their ideological differences were too much to bear. The molotov ribbentrop pact was a result of europe's refusal of USSR's proposal of anti-axis alliance prior to that, and when europe refused, they were still totally unprepared for war so they needed to stall germany for as long as possible (thus came Molotov Ribbentrop pact).

[@mikeguilmette776]

An interesting aside with that is if the Allies had been able to woo Italy - after all, Mussolini wasn't any worse than Stalin ever was.

[@57thorns]

@@enginecrafter7718 While there is no way their alliance would last, the question is how long the Soviets would be part of the Axis powers, because the video title is wrong. It should be "what is Germany had not attacked Soviet when they did, thereby ending the Molotov-Ribentroff pact".

[@enginecrafter7718]

@@57thorns That's true, but most probably they would fall out of favor of each other very quickly this way or another. Their ideologies are like day and night, completely incompatible. My guess is that IF germany remained oblivious to the whole thing and just went back to their own thing, the soviets would get ready for war and then would sweep over germany and all the areas it had annexed (with or without day D), and after it was all over, they would either install socialist governments across those liberated states or otherwise aid in their would be worker revolutions.

[@DjDeadpig]

True Nazbolism has been achieved

[@shawnv123]

W

[@janorgaWB]

The world war started in 1939, not when Germans invaded the Soviets

[@johndurham6172]

There is a school of thought that teaches that the war started when Japan invaded China.

[@ogbighomie9738]

​@@johndurham6172there was many relatively small conflicts through the 1930's but things really got serious when two of the largest armies in the world completely annihilated Poland in September 1939

[@shubhnamdeo2865]

@@ogbighomie9738 Japan invading China is not a "relatively" small conflict, it resulted in tens of millions of deaths, and Shanghai had fallen to Japan in 1937 which was among the most important cities of China, and it was a big battle of a million men.

[@ogbighomie9738]

@@shubhnamdeo2865 Japan invasion of China started in 1937 but it lasted for over 8 years

[@ogbighomie9738]

@@shubhnamdeo2865 that is local conflict just like Russian Special Military Operation is a local conflict. There isn't world war at the moment

[@thomasuga5708]

Just imagine if Germany didn’t backstab them. The Allie’s could’ve lost or caused even more deaths for the Allie’s especially

[@cookiecola5852]

Most likely not, no matter how we slice or dice it Sovjet army was garbage, tho the Red army eventually manage to stand up against Germany, but that was with a huge assistance and aid from America and the allies

[@Nigga978]

cap@@cookiecola5852

[@imranhossain3669]

​@@cookiecola5852You the American guys are always rude and have no knowledge about Russia

[@shubhnamdeo2865]

@@cookiecola5852 Yeah but the Axis Powers would have been provided great resources by the USSR. And also, the Soviets were re-modernizing their army as they suspected that Germany would betray them sooner or later. And mind you, the T-34s were already ready in 1940 and only awaited mass production. But yeah only after tasting two or three major defeats in battle would Stalin have decided, "This army work isn't my thing, maybe I'll just get out of the way of the generals."

[@wills.8662]

Well, for one thing the Canadian Parliament wouldn't have embarrassed itself last week....

[@DanH-u3f]

They did and split Poland in half to start WW2. Had they continued the alliance, Germany could have finished off Britain and started an Atlantic naval war with the US.

[@erikzemmers7935]

And everyone always forgets Latvia Lithuania and Estonia

[@bradleykhoury2102]

everyone forgets that the African campaign was a thing not just sealion

[@tolabassist3302]

Germany would finish off Britain? They couldn't even beat the British in the Seas much less the Air

[@erikzemmers7935]

.

[@superdouble8834]

@@tolabassist3302well this time it’s different, instead of thousands of planes, they *will have millions of planes made of humans supplied by Ussr * They would actually have more factories and way more planes and troops. Their wonder weapons would have succeeded and the new order will rise. Japanese empire might still fall when Ussr replaces Japan and demolish Japanese empire

[@aniapersa3454]

Imagine how fast the soviet would have fallen if it was a 1v1 😰

[@bassislandbannanas]

Now this is the kind of video I like from infographics

[@branfordmonticello853]

Nearly EVERY historian always leave out that Stalin tried to join the Axis Powes before the Barbarossa invasion. For that reason, the Soviets don't deserve sympathy. It's Stalin's fault.

[@skip123davis]

patton was right: after we conquered the germans he wanted to push further into soviet union and take them out next. "since we're here." he wanted to just finish it all up. he would have saved the world a lot of trouble, but occupying germany AND taking on the soviets would have been a tall order.

[@stevenroberts9992]

yano patton also said. that they faught the wrong enemy ;) and that he basically admitted that they should have joined forces with germany right? dont just nit pick quotes my dude lol

[@BilalAhmad-ff3xq]

​@@stevenroberts9992u have a point but notzees having enemies is not the same as the West having allies. What kind of reasoning abdicates the crimes of the ussr for the simple fact that the notzee also committed attrocities. Two things can be true at once u know.

[@kop1522]

​@@stevenroberts9992 He didn't mean it in that way, Patton didn't believe the Nazis were good or anything like that

[@Mustapha1963]

True. He did know that they knew how to fight. @@kop1522

[@NormalChannel95]

Patton and MacArthur would've saved the world a lot of trouble, doesn't mean they'd be right tho however Russia and China wouldn't be as much of a threat today

[@72tadrian65]

Honestly, if the dude stayed out of the whole genocide thing, he might’ve been a real revolutionary.. Crazy thoughts from old man

[@vger4781]

@user-wj6dt5bq3w Well, the French obviously thought so. When the Germans did it to THEM, they went ballistic in the treaty of Versailles however.

[@AndiGe_]

Well, in HOI4 this is called the unholy alliance

[@kwhp1507]

This kids is why Poland wants Russia to mess around one more time.

[@svenerikjohansson8130]

Interesting and backed up by a lot of facts. Well done research work, and a good summary. Contrafactual history - what could have happened "if or if not", and why, is often fascinating me.

[@brianmelton400]

They did Stalin insured ww2 when they allied against Poland.

[@VladVladimirabitch]

My people don't like facts or the truth 🙃

[@shawnv123]

that’s not the same as joining the axis though, the soviet union was a third party during ww2 from thirty nine- forty one while the allies were only the uk and france

[@evilcarlonis9015]

Stalin proposed an alliance between the two the pact moscow/berlin but germany didn’t agree with the sphere of influence proposed by stalin.

[@davidford3115]

And yet they still signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Alliance. Germany was content with letting Finland and the Baltic States be in the Soviet Sphere.

[@tiagoramalhais5493]

Their egos were too big to form a lasting aliance

[@davidford3115]

Ironically, it was only the Austrian Painter who wanted to tear up the Molotov-Ribbentrop Alliance. Almost all of the other members of the Third Recht wanted to maintain their mutually profitable arrangement at least until the Western Allies were defeated if not longer.

[@shubhnamdeo2865]

Yeah, that's for sure.

[@davidford3115]

@user-wj6dt5bq3w That was not reason enough to tear up the "Pact of Blood" as the Poles call it.

[@parashit2181]

For sure, there will be no James Bond movie because Ian Fleming had fail his mision

[@AmbyVish]

I personally think that Britain could've protected itself from the Germans. Their navy was much stronger than the German one, they had the Home Guard and they had the whole British empire to rely on. I think what would end up happening is both sides have a peace treaty and Britain exits the war with all pre-war territories

[@TwoDerrick]

"The Ju Bomber" what a name

[@davidford3115]

The Stuka? Oh, thanks to the short "Daffy the Commando" I present these two nuggets: A MESS of Messerschmidts. A Junk of Junkers (87s).

[@Splizzyfr]

Nice

[@marcinsurowaniec6504]

Ribbentrop Molotov ...

[@Bekindifnot...]

You see, you can experience all of these what if questions if you just play Hearts of Iron 4

[@karelhemala5699]

They did actually. Poles can tell you.

[@Zapper-kq1zg]

No

[@karelhemala5699]

@@Zapper-kq1zg Yes, they demolished Poland together at the start of the war... So I don't know what your "no" is reffering to :D

[@fizzbrew]

@@karelhemala5699 just a bot

[@robertliskey420]

Here is a thought that always bothered me (50 plus years studying this) What if Stalin just said "NO" you can't invade Poland?

[@ogbighomie9738]

Stalin knew that there is so much to gain from splitting Poland. Eastern Poland from 1930's were mostly Ukrainian and Belarusian people so he got the old borders back while the enslavement of the polish people was left for the Germans. Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was really great deal for Stalin.

[@kronotic]

I recommended this video idea to them! Me! They listened to ME! 🙌🏼

[@kanudutta4427]

Can we all appreciate how much he works for us

[@MichaelMcMoron]

Half of it is manuactured fantasy bs

[@Funnywierd3369]

United States?

[@thomashenebry8269]

Trudoif? That man child is in constant war with his own people, just like his father, Fidel.

[@goldengoose9941]

Name a better duo I'll wait

[@brendanfrost2475]

A comprehensive video for two of my childhood heroes. Nicely done!

[@zurielsss]

They did team up in Eastern Europe. Until operation Barbarossa

[@m.a.2633]

That would have been a terrifying thought.

[@richardbarbee71]

Love these videos good job

[@kriscarlson2716]

300 million Germans?

[@THE_ErwinRommel]

0:07 THATS THE GERMAN EMPIRE BORDERS

[@Dakshgamehaksh]

Yeah

[@markphelt6395]

Well Poland certainly tested the beta. 🤷🏾‍♂️

[@shubhnamdeo2865]

Yeah, all of Eastern Europe experienced the beta tests, and sadly it did not make it to release stage, the game got bugged and then broke down.

[@deanpanton1719]

Love the vids

[@haydenmarx6823]

They did.

[@MrMaximille]

They DID join their forces in 1939 and were teammates till 1941, until the "conflict of interests" popped up

[@epicsweatstuff5139]

End of the world as we know it

[@antmck99]

You mean end of Russia and Germany since the U.S was the only country with nuclear weapons

[@epicsweatstuff5139]

@@antmck99 I forgot about that

[@grandcanyon-d4d]

​@@antmck99the axis would have nukes too

[@KingOfGods27]

The biggest crossover since Batman v Superman

[@easiesteevee2532]

Thing is with the Americans not knowing about concentration camps, the British and Americans both knew of them due to polish and jewish escapees. They choose not to act.

[@D2attemp]

Poland: what do you mean “what if?”

[@troystaunton254]

He literally did. Then he betrayed him.

[@davidG-ni9ey]

Nobody: The Polish: Stalin coming from the East and Adolf in the West💀

[@derickdoig4008]

I can't see any possible way for Germany to build a navy to match the Royal Navy, let alone considering the American Navy getting involved.

[@XenSolation.]

Navy isn't everything

[@derickdoig4008]

@@XenSolation. at sea it's the only practical way to move an army and its equipment. Great Britain is an island.

[@akhsdenlew1861]

@@XenSolation. it's a lot though... and then don't forget the nukes... the americacs were the only ones with nukes. The only reason that Europe was not nuked, is the fact that USSR made some heavy lifting in the eastern front. if USSR was WITH germany, nukes would've 100% dropped in USSR ( churchil already wanted USSR nuked EVEN as allies), and ofc they would have to nuke germany as well.

[@XenSolation.]

In the hypothetical situation they fought the soviets, they would not have had those nukes. They relied on german scientists and even soviet ones. Their economy would have also been in shambles, not stable enough to maintain such an optimistic project. No nukes would have been dropped because there would be none to begin with. @@akhsdenlew1861

[@grandcanyon-d4d]

Germany might have showered them with V2 rockets

[@jebbroham1776]

The Soviet Union actually did consider joining the Axis after the fall of France, it was more of a means to prevent the invasion of Russia than an actual commitment to helping Germany defeat Britain.

[@Gettingchemo]

they joined the axis when they invaded Poland.

[@davidford3115]

Germany was basically asking the USSR to join the Anti-Comintern (ironic?) alliance with Japan. Stalin Demurred.

[@jebbroham1776]

@@davidford3115 this is true, but it was considered for a short time.

[@davidford3115]

@@jebbroham1776 While both the Japanese and Soviet viewed it as an anti-communism alliance, Germany and to a lesser extent Italy wanted to redirect it towards the US and UK. At least you are aware of those details. Sadly, those not familiar with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Alliance will be even less familiar with Anti-Comintern.

[@jebbroham1776]

@@davidford3115 ive been studying WW2 for almost 30 years, there’s very little I don’t know about the war in Europe, at least the war as we understand it in the present time. You can bet that as time goes on more facts and details will emerge from basements and attics of vets who’s loved ones donate their diaries and films to historians and museums, but for now, the basics give a more than clear picture into the politics of wartime Axis positioning in the first 2 years.

[@eduardovillagomez3675]

They did, it didn't last long, but they did

[@machector892]

It would have made the World War look like a pillow fight.

[@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman]

Oof

[@OnThePath777]

That would make Tradeu and the house of commons very happy 😊

[@AlisonBryen]

Oh. Canada. 🤦‍♀️

[@raymondmartin6737]

And Colonel Hogan with his men and women brought it down! 😂

[@JoshuaHistoryBuff]

They would have conquered the world together, it's that simple!

[@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman]

No, world conquering is hard asf and maintaining it is worst

[@PERU_VIP_007]

They never liked each other

[@DereC519]

wdym what if 😭

[@Karuro5222]

maybe they win ww2.

[@Meme_creator44x]

I just stopped watching your videos and right when I stopped watching your videos a video of yours popped up and it’s this one

[@jasongunningham9545]

I know right everything is either Russia or Ukraine videos

[@Meme_creator44x]

@@jasongunningham9545 yeah

[@havco501st7]

It was interesting at first but the more they kept popping up is when I stopped watching them until now

[@robertkarp2070]

Never knew Roosevelt sported a mustache.

[@garlandgarrison3739]

Poland: THEY DID !!!!!!!

[@LLEEMMRRPP]

This title is a little bit misleading You said "hitler's force+stalin's force" But what you are talking about is "Stalin's Non-intervention to Germany's invasion of Britain"

[@roo72]

They did for a long time.

[@Vandelberger]

This did miss a huge point. The reason the US / UK didn’t invade until 44 is because of how much material they sent to Russia. Tens of thousands of tanks, ammo, 400k trucks… insane amounts of material.

[@edmiesterful]

The main reason the US / UK could invade at all is that by 44 the Germans had been sufficiently worn down fighting the Soviets in the East.

[@shubhnamdeo2865]

@@edmiesterful And also the front at Italy was a bit tense, y'know?

[@drshakeelahmed7607]

Stalin+Hitler=Thanos

[@ethanwmonster9075]

mustache cannot be stopped

[@antmck99]

U.S = Odin

[@maxmaham]

Didn’t they join forces, and then filter betrayed Stalin? Lol

[@worri3db3ar]

...while critisizing of France and Britain but look at what america has become....

[@mathnerd97]

@15:22 it's not all about size, it's how you use it

[@SonicGI]

that's what sometimes always makes me think and try what would happen if this video really happened and I said something like this in my brain what would happen if America never existed? What will happen when WW2 occurs?

[@falconeshield]

America would be part of the UK

[@popscratchie3985]

WW2 has already happened?

[@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman]

​​@@popscratchie3985re-read 🤦

[@cfl_finn4831]

They did! Poland, France, Balkans, Low countries, Denmark, Norway and plenty others got occupied by Germany It was all uphill for Germany until they invaded Soviets and the war extended beyond the 2 year mark

[@nuclearraingames.]

It isn't how big your army is that matters, it is how well it performs." Look at Russia for a second and you will immediately agree.

[@davidford3115]

Indeed. How many times in history has the world's strongest military at the time been defeated by a bunch of backwater farmers?

[@HarryBolz-st5ki]

​@@davidford3115😂😂😂

[@shino8854]

Home advantage plays a big part.

[@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman]

​​@@davidford3115thats why speed, incredible tech and tactics and geography always win,...... Mostly anyways

[@davidford3115]

@@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman Technology tactics and terrain are force multipliers.

[@chad_dogedoge]

Well , we are in post apocalypsis now if that happen

[@BurksToreyArky]

The "what 88 bomber"??!!😂😅

[@jayr7890]

"what if" they did lol

[@seanscott]

well technically they were allies at the beginning of ww2 with their pact between them basically stating i wont attack if you dont. stalin allowed germany to test their "non" military vehicles and aircraft in the soviet union because of the treaty of versailles stating germany must demilitarize and were forbid of forming another military force. then germany launched operation barbarossa and invaded the soviet union effectively ending the pact on june 22nd, 1941.

[@randoomrandoo1230]

THEY DID IT WAS CALLED THE MOLOTOV PACT!

[@TheBasicsofficial_]

fun fact is that Stalin was MORE against the NAZIS THAN EVERYONE ELSE

[@brokenbridge6316]

Nicely done video

[@3801NSWGR.]

This ‘what if’ is just what if they didn’t do operation Barbarossa. Not really a what If they were friends, but a what if they stayed friends

[@SuperiorAmericanGuy]

Now do a video about the history of the jet engine so I can talk about the Me 262 terror jet that killed my American grandparents.

[@Skipper.17]

Why is it with these that the British commonwealth is never bought up in the conversation.

[@dongfloppy4088]

Yea im pretty sure Russia was on the Axis side before they realized that they were loseing and decided to join the Allied side. Pretty sure and some how its something alot of people don't know.

[@stargazer-elite]

Your saying they did an Italy 😂

[@glowyboi7175]

Russia was never "losing" against the West, they were backstabbed by the Nazis.

[@jeremiasnolasco-uw2lt]

They did team up, it’s just that it was a military pact, the Soviet Union was never part of the axis powers, so up until 1941 it was a neutral country.

[@MaxDangerPower]

If they and Japan allied, we would have likely lost.

[@grandcanyon-d4d]

imagine a rain of V2 rockets and a horde of Japanese Yamatos

[@MaxDangerPower]

@@grandcanyon-d4d If enough V2s poured onto a city, it could do significant damage, but they weren't known for accuracy. Towards the end of the war, Germany actually had fighter jets. If the war were more prolonged, they probably would've had nukes and fighter jets before we could stop them.

[@grandcanyon-d4d]

@@MaxDangerPower they would have had way more than enough with the Russian resources

[@michaelmoore7568]

They considered themselves so similar that the could convince each other to join their side. The Nazi's literally originated Stalin's campaign for example. They later both changed minds and tried to be the first to betray the other.

[@Snagprophet]

You should take a look at Operation Vegetation to understand why Germany would never be able to conquer the British Isles. All the Americans did was save the Germans from being irradiated with anthrax bombs which would've killed millions, because it gave us an opportunity for D-Day.

[@jorge5724]

Let's be honest if it wasn't for the Soviets the Allies would have lost

[@froilangonzalez963]

True Stallon had the best mustache man

[@AmbroseP27]

Yeah, If they continued being friends we would’ve lost

[@brockpodgurski6144]

They did...

[@snakeeateerrrrr]

They did…

[@ScentlessSun]

The USA would have had to use more than two nuclear weapons to win the war.

[@antmck99]

Ill say this, Russia would be gone. Germany would be as it is

[@akhsdenlew1861]

@@antmck99 not really, germany would've been nuked as well.. if germany doesn't fight USSR on the eastern front, germany is RIDICULUSLY strong.

[@grandcanyon-d4d]

how many nukes would have been dropped on the USA too?

[@cozakokotano6448]

Germany would have swept through all over Europe nuking Germany alone wouldn't be effective. They will have to nuke all the countries occupied.

[@bradleykhoury2102]

I love how no one here points out that Germany most likely does't sealion (mainly because they really cant) and infgraficshow forgets about the Africa campaign and them bailing out Italy

[@flea1985]

Thers no If.... They where allies in 1939

[@JonP_4-31inf]

They did... this video is hilarious.

[@Michael_Afton40]

If germany never betrayed the soviet union we would live in a WHOLE different world

[@coreyleander7911]

Okay but they did. How is this video real? Anyone can look up the German Soviet commercial agreements during the Holocaust