What is 566 nm in Hertz? - Wavelength to Frequency Practice

What is the frequency (in Hz) of light having a wavelength of 566 nm?
How to calculate frequency from wavelength.
How to convert nanometers to Hertz.
How to convert wavelength to frequency.
Teachers Pay Teachers Practice Worksheets: bit.ly/TheChemTeach-TPT
Light Calculations Practice 1.0:
www.teacherspayteachers.com/P...
Answer Key 1.0:
www.teacherspayteachers.com/P...
Question is credited to Chang Chemistry 10th Edition 7.7 (b)
My Website - bit.ly/TheChemTeacherWebsite
My Teachers Pay Teachers Site - bit.ly/TheChemTeach-TPT
My KZbin Page - bit.ly/TheChemTeacher

[@surir9911]

Thank you

[@gabrielacostatourinho8175]

thank you so much! perfect explication

[@alianajihaanizar2805]

Thank you✨✨✨

[@arisraort4521]

Buen video!

[@Lovelyleyy]

Just what I needed

[@violet1993]

HULOG NG LANGIT TALAGA TONG VIDEO NA TOH 🙌🙌

[@donut3408]

Thank you you help me with my chem homework very good good

[@andreantonyninantayzarate8502]

Where do you get the final result? it doesn't come out on the calculator maybe you can explain step by step please

[@BunnyDoxx]

thank you this makes perfect sense.

[@thechemteacher]

I'm glad it helped!

[@Jennifersantos-ot8br]

how did you get the -7 in 5.66 x 10^(-7 )?

[@thechemteacher]

In orange, I converted 566 nm to 5.66x10^-7 m. I needed to convert nm (nanometers) to m (meters) so that I could solve for Hertz. Does that answer your question? If that doesn't answer your question, what are you getting instead of -7?

[@juliannamarie8067]

If I were instead to divide the 566nm (10^-9 m/ 1 nm ) would it give me the same result? It’s is alright if I use it that way?

[@thechemteacher]

Yes, 566 nm x (10^-9 m / 1 nm) = 5.66x10^-7 m. That way is also correct!

[@juliannamarie8067]

@@thechemteacher Thanks for clearing doubt !

[@subdynoman]

It would have been wrong for me, it clearly states to give the answer in hz

[@hoofheartedicemelted296]

Explication - The process of analysing and developing an idea or principle in detail. ie; "This term is meaningless without further explication and analysis" "On further analysis, I agree completely" lol. Sorry couldn't resist. 😋

[@eroskane1866]

Please 220hz how much nm thank you

[@thechemteacher]

Watch this video of mine for a problem just like yours. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZXIpIOlaL19oNE

[@mariamarli9239]

Num tinha em português?

[@thechemteacher]

desculpe eu não falo português

[@mariamarli9239]

@@thechemteacher a legenda querido

[@thechemteacher]

Eu acho que as legendas estão apenas em inglês. (I think the auto-generated captions are only in English)

[@mariamarli9239]

@@thechemteacher ah que pena, mas quando eu vi o vídeo tinha legenda em português obrigado por me responder

[@awetlegese4885]

Oh thank you but how you get to 300×10/8÷5.66×10/-7=5.30×10/14 My q is how you get +14

[@thechemteacher]

If you do the wrong order of operations you will get the wrong exponent. If your final answer has an exponent of 1 (5.3x10^1) then your calculator did the wrong order of operations. Using parentheses for (5.66×10^-7) should help.