What is a Square-1.5?

[@aryasaktiflister_aw]

Square-0.5 and Square-not1 was genius, to see that a big bandaged piece makes it more complicated. I can't wait for an actual algorithm analysis for both of them

[@郭凤-s5q]

Yeah...

[@ethankim6806]

@@郭凤-s5qyeah

[@nitugurung9787]

make a square -2

[@timeisahorse114]

Square-1n't

[@dakotabogart405]

Square-1²

[@Nizz0781]

Magnetize a gear cube

[@IamNOBODY026]

Yes

[@TrainingCuber]

Yes

[@aprilsheng153]

YES

[@AarushBhandari_]

Yes

[@fishercubergamer9328]

Yes

[@_Heb_]

I think we can go further. I expect a video on the Square-3, the Square-1/3, the Square-e, and the Square-i soon

[@HANG.1206]

square-(e^i) square-(i!) square-(root(2)) square-(phi) square-(pi) square-((1/2)!) square-(i^i) square-(i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^...)

[@agitated_cat]

i personally am expecting a square-pi video.

[@bagelnine9]

What about the square-π?

[@geeteevee7667]

HOW WOULD A SQUARE-i WORK

[@_Heb_]

@@bagelnine9 No such thing, it would be a circle not a square

[@Pixomite]

These puzzles are super trippy lol. Great video as always, I can’t even wrap my mind around how you’re even doing this.

[@happymario3223]

Someone: Hey, is that a 1x1? Z3Cubing: No, it's my *Square-(-3)*

[@supertails848]

LOL

[@MilanRubiksCube97]

Amazing. I love bandaged puzzles! I'd love to try this out. Also there is one more version you missed called "big block bandaged square-1". But I can definitely understand why it's not included as it's not a straightforward piece swap mod like the rest

[@deanjones6480]

I would call the Square0/Square2 a "Square Two halves" (Square 2/2). The new name is still distinct from Square 1, but also still mathematically holds.

[@JJCuber27]

I thought that you would swap one layer's pieces with another, but this definitely seems more crazy (also I've heard that a "Square-3" exists by putting square-1 pieces on one side and square-2 pieces on another)

[@void2258]

A square 3 would be a square 2 with the center cut into 4 pieces.

[@Izzythemaker127]

no part square-1 and part square-2 is shown in the video and its squae-1.5

[@rk31]

@@void2258 they have one that has sq1 on top and sq2 on bottom on the cubicle and it is know as square 3

[@hajackie9445]

A square 3?

[@AdvikSanjitBurnwal]

No a square 3 is basically a square 2 with edges cut in half

[@void2258]

Square 3: cut the middle layer in half on a Square 2 E(dge). square 2 M(iddle): cut the middle layer in half but leave the top and bottom as on a Square 1.

[@OmegaCat9999]

You should call the Square-0 and Square-2 mod the "Square-1Type2"

[@jesusfernandez2094]

I think it would better to name it "Square 2^0"

[@cater_piler]

square-1 fraud because it is and isn't a square 1@@jesusfernandez2094

[@Seres568]

0:35 this made me cry

[@guestguest8278]

Can you make tiles that can change a square 2 to a 1 or 0 it would save a lot of money

[@hedgergd]

Fun fact: the square -1 is actually a square -0.5, because every level down removes 4 pieces, but that only removed 2.

[@MemeAnt]

Call it a square I. For imaginary number.

[@TheMan10what]

you made me do math for the first time in forever

[@schuyler8497]

Amazing Z3Cubing

[@neon_05]

excited to see the square pi

[@victor_creator]

6:49 the square-root-of-2

[@eutatsu]

Thats a great name for it! or the Suqare-√2, read as square-radical two

[@MaxwellCatAlphonk]

Square 2%x+yц2z-(z²)ⁿ

[@g-squared2830]

MagLev: exists Z3Cubing: stonks

[@Charsleezyios]

Wouldn’t the square negative 1 you made, actually be a square negative 0.5, because the difference between the square 0, square 1, and square 2 is two divisions of the the top and bottom layer, meaning you would need to remove 2 divisions of the top and bottom layer of the square 0 to make an actual square negative 1?

[@samsonmarkarian9456]

You’re the best youTuber

[@lukatolstov5598]

1:35 Checkerboard pattern on square -1.

[@trulycubing]

leave it to z3 to find the funniest possible mods.

[@TyperMarlinGames]

That square- -1 has to be a joke, right?

[@mr_jerryrune]

no. the square one is a rectangle

[@SimonTiger]

6:29 According to J Perm, the square-2 is easier than the square-1. However, he actually managed to solve the square-2 by blockbuilding (so not like a square-1), and he also doesn't know how to solve a square-1...I still agree that the square-2 is easier tho Also, taking the average of 0 and 2, we get (0+2)/2, or 2/2, so I guess the last puzzle should be called the square-2/2?

[@muyou0107]

J Perm can solve SQ-1.

[@SimonTiger]

@@muyou0107 In his square-2 vid he said he has no memory on how to solve a square-1

[@Helio_Asou]

It is cuz you don't need previous knowledge in order to solve intuitively a Square-2, you just need 1 basic conmutator and that's it. For intuitive Square-1 you need to deduce a lot more stuff, and bandaging is a big problem. Yes, there's the speedcubing method, but reaching that method intuitively is hard. I know how to solve both puzzles, and I solved the Square-2 like a Time Machine lol

[@SimonTiger]

@@Helio_Asou So you're saying it's easier to FIGURE OUT a method to solve a square-2. Just realized, that begs the question: is blockbuilding actually a better method for square-2 than solving it like a square-1 (like...speedsolving-wise or whatever)?

[@Helio_Asou]

@@SimonTiger It depends. If you want to just solve the Square-2 blockbuilding is way easier to learn and you skip a lot of unnecesary stuff (no cubeshape, almost no algs, no parity), but if you already know how to solve a Square-1 it might be better to learn reduction. The thing with "just solving puzzles" is that there's not a better method, you can go with the thing that works best for you, unlike speedcubing where the method is really important for a bunch of factors and you're really limited by that. Now, about speedsolving Square-2... reduction is the way to go

[@cardinalhamneggs5253]

The last puzzle should be called “Square One Alternative” or “SQ-1 Alt”.

[@NehaPatel-ii6nh]

Your an square 1 expert!

[@ItsTonez]

You have the craziest mod ideas 🤯😅

[@cubingclackingnoise597]

his next video: i have solved the square-0.5 and square-not1 and i will show you how

[@lukatolstov5598]

Shapeshifting puzzles is that, which changes it's structures.

[@duchoang591]

NICE VID❤

[@rgnszeb123]

“Fractional numbers of squareness” Lego Boyz 2022

[@dreamergamer1isbadlol47]

Yoo no way I actually almost called the -1 completely in terms of design (I made a comment recently on his last sq- video with the trifecta and didn't expect to see this)

[@everestfarmer9250]

You could do a puzzle that's one big Square-Negative-One piece and four Square-One pieces per side and call it the Square-Not-Zero. Or, if you're British, Square-Not-Naught ;)

[@ultrachad5492]

Magnetize a master pyraminx

[@elijahj.w]

Add adjustable magnets to an RS3M? I think it would be interesting!

[@farzanaraz9487]

Square-(-0.5) can be made by removing half of a square-(-1) and a square-0 and mixing them up. Square-0.75 can be made by removing half of a square-0.5 and a square-1 and mixing them up.

[@tropangace9123]

Happy cubing sir

[@cfoper8822]

Woah woah woah square one is turning weird now

[@dfwrailvideos]

Okay, a cube between a square zero and square 2 is a square 1, or a square-1-squared?

[@Humulator]

square 2/2

[@samuelefront9901]

Jperm be like: "Trying to slolve a square-0.5 with no help (COMMUTATORS)"

[@the.meepiest1171]

what if you instead of bandaging the diagonals you do each side. or what if you made the square-not0.5 a -1 combined with a 2

[@tesseract7586]

i love the square-[0,2]

[@TheSpeedQuber]

Nice watch tan

[@ftosolverfr1020]

Square 3

[@mr_jerryrune]

z3 cubing, i was watching when you were at 10k subs you’ve grown, lots i remember your old intro with the z3 cube, and the one you 3d printed, please respond, it’s my dream

[@omgcubing9964]

Send the square-0.5 and the square-not1 to cube master. He's a square-1 god

[@lukatolstov5598]

We have a square-3 and square-4 too.

[@Swagpion]

The square-(-2) is the boob cube.

[@ItsLuminousOfficial]

If ur reading this z3, I love your content

[@OConcretoGamer]

You should call the Squere-0 and Square-2 mod the Square-n't

[@jimiwills]

Brilliant 😂❤

[@burnedgrapes]

try making a mirror force cube!

[@Denorial]

make a square 3, or what i call it Z3 cube. please make your own cube like yoo cube by cubehead.

[@fullestegg]

square -i is way more fitting for the last cube

[@pentapodes5708]

I thought the same thing :)

[@AyaanIsFromPakistan]

Hey Z3 Cubing Make the Square-3!

[@alan720p]

make like a "force" square-1 with only 1 solution (shapeshift) bc the orginal has 2 (shapeshift, and colour)

[@treehooputg]

Can you make a maglev megaminx

[@Scudmaster11]

Did you solve the square-1/2 on video?

[@thisislame1233]

What is a square negative three?

[@zainislam6102]

Can u make this a real cube to order/buy

[@ayoutubefan9710]

I’d call the “square not 1” the “square |1|”

[@PaGDu333]

Square absolute 1

[@mythrilchromee1379]

square -2: literally a 1x1

[@peterzvo]

This man is crazy

[@BingusRingusMcDingus]

Boooooooooooooo rushia bad

[@peterzvo]

@@BingusRingusMcDingus No.

[@bannerlord6055]

New cube square and a half

[@SamiSaba2]

Magnetize an atlasminx or maybe even a minx of madness

[@jackboggess3251]

Could any of these have parity

[@dgp423]

just checking with you if i can copy your pb sheet format

[@Z3Cubing]

Fine with me, it's just a spreadsheet!

[@dgp423]

@@Z3Cubing thanks

[@dabbingsquidward7749]

If you make the top colors of the square -1 the same then it will become a q-biod

[@NehaPatel-ii6nh]

Bro if you are having trouble on the sqaure 0.5 just forget about the algs you know on sqaure 1. That is what i will do. It will be easy for me because i don't square 1 algs.

[@JoanRubik]

It would certainly be called a squer-menos 0

[@zodiakgames]

The combo of square 0 and 2: square root -1?

[@schuyler8497]

5:47 That is the Square-1.5

[@SweetyTurtle]

Thx❤

[@Blackfromstickworld]

To make a square -2 just remove the top and bottom

[@RorysAdventures2024]

Next video: What is a square 3?

[@최현석-d1s]

one day you can live stream until you solve all of your puzzle!

[@jagerplays6794]

I would like to see square- -2

[@Kewber]

NICE!

[@Flornnn]

So square-(-2) is a 1x1x3?

[@W4LRUS7769]

Try mixing all of the square 1, 0, and 2

[@PaGDu333]

Square Root2

[@HmmmmmLemmeThinkNo]

I would imagine that you should skip the "make it a square shape" step - that'll come at the end?

[@Matt-no7gg]

The Square-0 and 2 Halves

[@mcjavabelike8320]

imo the fraction of a square-x cube should be smaller cube used to make it --------------------------------------------------- larger cube used to make it

[@zainislam6102]

A square-1 diagnosied with square smallness

[@whataboutbort]

Z3cubing if you see this you’re the best and I love your vids

[@taliheffetz3468]

i miss legoboyz3

[@Amir-vp7di]

He still is legoboy

[@HGSE_10]

If you don't know to solve square-0.5, I will make the tutorial to solve the square-0-5. (Coming soon)

[@SharpsDoubleRifle]

The square-(-1) should be the square-(-0.5) and the square not 1 should be the square-1.3 repeating, sounds better imo

[@LexiLex421]

How about calling the square 0+2 as the square e Or square i? (Oh wait that’s -1)

[@Vortexion09]

Yoooo. I love this video. I have an idea for you. Try to put in a frizer a new lubricated Rubik's cube and see what happends. Pls, if you make this video, put my comment. Thank you👊👊👊

[@8316WC]

Now make a square -3. :)

[@jhgvvetyjj6589]

Square (−0.5) : Merge square 0 pieces and square (−1) pieces

[@young_mikolaj]

i'm waiting for a square-3

[@theletteralpha]

god what would a square -3 look like

[@abzcbe]

Current square puzzles: square 1, square 2, square 0, square 0.5, square 1.5, square -1, square -0.5, square not 1

[@hedgergd]

7:10 square 0.999

[@SuperJxl]

square -.5, square 1.5 and the square root.

[@bmwM3gtr561]

Try making a Square 3

[@AlvinBalvin321]

a better square-0.5 would have all 6 equaly sized peices

[@HANG.1206]

square-(-0.5), square-i and square-(-i) is existential?

[@mathiasbrio2105]

What about a square-e, or a square-(π-3) Oh, and what about a square-(√2)