What is Airbus' next aircraft?

Рет қаралды 56,569

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 47

@tobiwan001 3 ай бұрын

The 777X is delayed to the point that it will only have a brief timeframe to compete with the A350 until an A350neo is launched.

@WhyInnovate 3 ай бұрын

AB won’t make any major changes as Boeing is such poor competition at the moment no need to do major overhaul

@nikobelic4251 3 ай бұрын

I think they will Even though Boeing is having issues if they come out of these issues with a far superior airplane Airbus will fall behind

@williamwatitwa3534 3 ай бұрын

Wait untill china gets certification for its planes and starts printing them out ,

@itsme-vw5yo 2 ай бұрын

@@nikobelic4251 no Airbus prefers to have a competition so their backlog won't flood more than it is already.

@Sacto1654 3 ай бұрын

I think GE is seriously looking at a GE9X variant specifically tailored for the A350-1000 in a future NEO version.

@artrandy 3 ай бұрын

I imagine GE are "seriously looking" on in envy at the success of the A350, whilst the B777X programme is continually suffering delay after delay to certification, and has its own technical issues. The latest being about the integrity of the engine pylons. Oh, how GE must be regretting that they upset Airbus & refused to engine the A350-1000 at the start of this project, which gave RR an open door, cemented an exclusive contract between Airbus on the 350 with RR until 2030, and with technical developments being derived from the UltraFan testbed, RR are now upgrading the XWBs. By the time Airbus feel they need to Neo the A350, I suspect that the GE9X will be very old technology. Besides, what's in it for Airbus, to go to the expense of funding an engine option on an aircraft which is already sold out until the 2030s? The A350 clearly doesn't need GE to be a success, its only American airlines that demand to have US engines (though I tip my hat to the people at Delta), and if every legacy carrier in the US would order it with GE engines, Airbus couldn't possibly supply it. So there is no incentive for Airbus to upset RR, for nothing, when its RR that are delivering the goods. GE made their bed, and it was with Boeing, and now all the company's w/b aspirations are stuck with that of Boeing. Tough. Too bad.........

@x-gamessimulator1067 3 ай бұрын

Yap @@artrandy

@artrandy 3 ай бұрын

@@x-gamessimulator1067 Yap went the dog, because he couldn't express himself in words............

@basilpunton5702 3 ай бұрын

Started with a wrong statement "a tube with two engines". Completely ignored the A340 and A380.

@jeremypearson6852 3 ай бұрын

With a five year backlog of orders, Airbus doesn’t need to be in a rush to deploy another model.

@Yabd13 3 ай бұрын

Yeah, they're already dealing with hundreds of orders for a350s, a320s, etc.

@porroapp 3 ай бұрын

AI avatar looks alright

3 ай бұрын

The lip sync is a bit dodgy though

@Dilipverma81 2 ай бұрын

you are best news channel for airplane

@haemmertime 3 ай бұрын

Having the air frame done but not the engine would be a very soviet thing to do😂

@klyvemurray 3 ай бұрын

6:17 Cool story, bro ✈

@pravasitrollen-qf4pl 2 ай бұрын

good video

@மாஸ்மனோ-ற1ண 2 ай бұрын

Please come back to make more videos. I enjoyed this channel, am sad you don't make more content.

@DanFrederiksen 3 ай бұрын

I'm not sure airbus needs to fear a narrow niche of 777. But I would like to see a plane done in pure carbon fiber, in a more aerodynamic shape a bit like Celera and Piaggio such that its compound curves makes just a carbon fiber shell rigid enough. So it has no frames or stringers, as light as can be. In A320 size and 2mm thick CF it could hold 10 bar pressure and weight only 1.6 ton for the entire fuselage. Similar for wings and some for floors etc, it could be around 4ton before engines. A lighter plane needs smaller engines so I would place them at the back like a private jet or Embraer ERJ. Better aero and rear engines could be much quieter cabin. It also means it can have shorter gear which is lighter and simpler. Then take it up to 50000 feet or higher where the air is thin and let it soar. I think you could pull off maybe 40% reduction in fuel consumption which would be pretty huge. If it's also quick and inexpensive to manufacture then it will be very hard to beat. And despite reputation, carbon fiber is actually quite inexpensive. It easily pays for itself. I estimate that an A320 size plane would use 150k$ worth of brand name carbon fiber and that's just insignificant cost. btw I would make it without windows. Digital windows on a quality OLED screen on the back of the seat. Where you can select what direction you want to look in better quality than looking out a window. It should have airless tires and spin them up with an electric motor for touchdown so it shudders less and wears less. It could also have motors to push back by itself but that's a little more risky to have motors opposing the landing direction but with careful design it could probably be safe.

@x-gamessimulator1067 3 ай бұрын

A220-500 Coning Soom

@runeskogstad6927 3 ай бұрын

Doesn´t airplanes need to have some metal In the fuselage and wings to prevent lightning strikes?

@DanFrederiksen 3 ай бұрын

@@runeskogstad6927 I think they embed some metal strips here and there, apparently it's manageable. maybe even if you ignore it. many small GA planes are pure composite. Airbus A350 and B787 are mostly carbon, I haven't seen any large metal in them. I wouldn't be surprised if they just put thin metal tape along the spine before paint and that's that. But it's worth considering in the design. Carbon fiber is slightly conductive but it might explode and delaminate the hull which is an expensive repair

@khairulnaeim756 3 ай бұрын

Maybe if want to build new version one, maybe can started with honour our words (safety, security, customer comfort & so on), with this inspiration, maybe can get what it will be...😊 rather than started with fantasy (logic) first...

@jmonkfische 3 ай бұрын

Really interesting video thank you 😄 Does anyone happen to know which movie or tv show the footage at 6:04 is taken from please?

@jayanthj-g6r 2 ай бұрын

Why are you not making any more videos?

@MartinHarvey 3 ай бұрын

You mentioned REX and its turboprop operations but quickly showed an all-jet and now bankrupt REX! PS we wish REX all the best with its current troubles.

@anthonydeas2173 3 ай бұрын

I think the RR ultra fan can be scaled up or down dependent on wise or narrow body styles, and there is talk of an open fan engine design as well... Interesting times ahead.. I think an a350neo would gain market traction especially as the 777X test flights have recently been suspended

@x-gamessimulator1067 3 ай бұрын

I don't think the Ultra Fan is a next-generation engine. It's nothing more than a Geared TurboFan Engine. The problem with the Geared TurboFan Engine is that the take-off power is reduced! During take-off, the turbine fills up, but a gearbox lowers the FAN's RPM, which reduces power!

@watcherzero5256 3 ай бұрын

@@x-gamessimulator1067 RR are saying the Ultrafan is about 10% more fuel efficient than the current gen and 25% more than the previous gen. They are achieving it by going large and light, larger slower rotating fan blades move more air per rotation. This would be incompatible with the 737 as it has very limited ground clearance and the you would have to scale it right down for a A320 such that a reengine probably wouldn't be worth it. But for a new generation of aircraft designed to accommodate larger engines with higher wing placement and taller landing gear it offers great potential. To reduce gearbox power loss they have removed the low pressure compressors and isolated the gearbox. So rather than a five stage process in other geared turbofans of Fan-Low Pressure compressor-High Pressure Compressor-High Pressure Turbine-Low Pressure Turbine. Instead its a three stage process of Fan-High pressure Compressor-High Pressure Turbine-Low Pressure Turbine.

@x-gamessimulator1067 3 ай бұрын

@@watcherzero5256 Ultra FAN is big and weak! The GE 90X has more power in almost the same size!

@x-gamessimulator1067 3 ай бұрын

@@watcherzero5256 It can be 25% more efficient but with much less take-off power! The gearbox is good for cruising because in cruising the FAN + engine power can spin freely, increasing the turbine's exhaust power, but it's lousy for low-altitude flight, where the turbine is most required! low altitude flight where the turbine is required the most! If it was so revolutionary, most airplanes would have these engines! The A350 uses the RR 8X XWB trains and the A380 uses a Grearded engine!

@x-gamessimulator1067 3 ай бұрын

@@anthonydeas2173 It can be 25% more efficient but with much less take-off power! The gearbox is good for cruising because in cruising the FAN + engine power can spin freely, increasing the turbine's exhaust power, but it's lousy for low-altitude flight, where the turbine is most required! low altitude flight where the turbine is required the most! If it was so revolutionary, most airplanes would have these engines! The A350 uses the RR 8X XWB trains and the A380 uses a Grearded engine!

@rdmorris1947 3 ай бұрын

You, sir, are cute as a bug's ear.

@ireneuszfus8398 3 ай бұрын

Unless they'll make this "blended-wing" thing it's not too important for "normal"people, cause all the passenger planes look the same for me and many more ppl, It's jest a tube with wings and engines in different sizes. I, for one, can't even tell a difference between boeing or airbus, either from the outside or the inside. Sure i know, there are some differencies but none to make them distinguishable from one another in my eyes. Except i'd rather not fly on boeing for safety reasons

@nikobelic4251 3 ай бұрын

Average landlubber opinion, and no offense it’s not worth much….

@decam5329 3 ай бұрын

60 or 16 a month?

@x-gamessimulator1067 3 ай бұрын

I believe that the next generation of airplanes will be hybrids! 100% electric airplanes will have a hard time as well as hydrogen airplanes with their heavy tanks with Hydrogen at 700 Bars!

@nikobelic4251 3 ай бұрын

Airbus already said they are working on a 100% SAF A320 replacement and a Hydrogen powered airplane that will be separate (Zero E) one of the zero E concepts could be a hybrid blend of hydrogen and kerosene / SAF. But the A320 replacement would be conventionally / SAF fueled

@عمار_طواف 3 ай бұрын

just get the a330 neo and nake it 70m long, new wing and ge90 engine with a250 or 787 ass

@smorphin9757 3 ай бұрын

Bedenkt bitte die Warme Luft Regen Generatoren waagerecht u l schiene und seitlich flach mit Luftdruck kammer und verengte Kanäle Pressluft schmal, breit hinten und Flügel dazwischen frei lassen und mngnetfeld u l Schiebe und Luft und Staub und Wasserteilchen. Übersetzung m arcel m agnet