Actually, it's a word. I had to look it up to believe it.
@miyuki-sama27617 жыл бұрын
its legit, didnt sound right until i googled it
@Tomyb157 жыл бұрын
I thought I had misheard.
@ninjad097 жыл бұрын
i laughed so hard when i heard him say that. silly linus
@Red4Ever7 жыл бұрын
i dont get it
@leodechant9847 жыл бұрын
All I care about is my k/D ratio
@pleasedontwatchthese95937 жыл бұрын
you some kind of furry?!
@ali_gaming31907 жыл бұрын
mine is 1:1000
@brontoab17 жыл бұрын
Leo DeChant all the losers do!
@saladgreens9127 жыл бұрын
k/d? pfft, its all about those assist tho
@poochyenarulez7 жыл бұрын
better get ready to be yiffed.
@pilebunker4207 жыл бұрын
is it me or linus' face and hands look too yellow?
@rev_dude7 жыл бұрын
ayy lmao they always have
@jorionedwards7 жыл бұрын
I see it x9.
@marcusx22x7 жыл бұрын
Looks like he ate a bag of cheeto's.:)
@rempuiafanai71037 жыл бұрын
ayy lmao Thats the thermal paste, cant believe its still there.
@pilebunker4207 жыл бұрын
you know the contrast ratio part makes no sense, right?
@mahirooyama94247 жыл бұрын
"a huge grain of salt" well it won't be a grain anymore more like a block of salt
@NitishDevadiga_Rattle-Snake6197 жыл бұрын
owlcity24 Deep
@Ignacio.Romero7 жыл бұрын
So clevelerlier
@stephentroyer38317 жыл бұрын
Just look closelier.
@sou100mit7 жыл бұрын
he meant kosher salt and not table salt.
@IannoOfAlgodoo7 жыл бұрын
I like the idea of a ball of salt more for some reason xD
@colonfrancelj93567 жыл бұрын
"If you look 'closlier' " - Linus
@tonya75177 жыл бұрын
- Linus 2017
@lorenzopirozzi72987 жыл бұрын
Jo-Bob Bubba Dude it’s an actual word, Google it
@jort93z7 жыл бұрын
a very old one though. not used anymore. might as well start using thou(not the unit obviously) again xD. Though it is quite weird people just decided they don't need a singular word for that anymore.
@colonfrancelj93567 жыл бұрын
Adverb closelier 1. (rare, literary, dated) comparative form of closely: more closely
@AB-sr9mc6 жыл бұрын
@Jo-Bob Bubba , Wikipedia is NOT a dictionary. Try the Oxford English Dictionary for example.
@LazerLord107 жыл бұрын
So... i have an old plasma screen TV. I'd assume that it has a pretty decent contrast ratio? It looks pretty good to me.
@javiercastillaOK3 жыл бұрын
"pretty good to me" that's very relative lol. I didn't notes that I had a crappy display until I compare it side by side
@ntz7523 жыл бұрын
@@javiercastillaOK plasmas have near oled level blacks,no led will ever get near them when it comes to contrast.
@alpzerlaken3 жыл бұрын
@@ntz752 but will putting another polarizer film to the screen increase a contrast ratio?
@ghaitm327 жыл бұрын
This video was really really amazing and informative, and the editing in the background for clarification was awesome, i mean all of your videos are high quality, but this one is special, good job team (y) .
@michaeldiaz59437 жыл бұрын
Closelyer
@thedanielchaniel7 жыл бұрын
"Infinite contrast" makes sense to me. The reason why some number divided by 0 is undefined is because as you approach 0 from the left (negative) side, the limit of some number / x is negative infinity; but, as you approach 0 from the right (positive) side, it's positive infinity. Because the limits aren't equal, it's undefined. But in the world of contrast ratios, aren't you really only approaching 0 from the positive side? You can't really have a negative brightness anyway. Hence, infinite contrast?
@498fun7 жыл бұрын
Daniel Rockcastle Exactly what I was thinking dude. Believe this is true until we have panels that emit negative light. But that's just being black by default, so this logic probably always holds
@marcospacheco68354 жыл бұрын
Hmm?that makes absolute no fucking sense like your math is right and shit but your premise is wrong in order for your statement to be correct you would have to continuously and constantly approach 0 which in my very short research of infinite contrast monitors do not truly exist
@Seegs1087 жыл бұрын
Linus, your description is incorrect. The 3000:1 or 1000:1 numbers you're quoting are called on/off or full field contrast numbers. The scene in which you discuss how the bright city lights compare to the dark background would be quantified by an ANSI contrast or intrascene contrast ratio, not on/off contrast. This is because, most of the time, you'll never actually reach the level of on/off contrast the screen is capable of when you have mixed content on screen. On/off contrast numbers are used by manufacturers because, more often than not, they're much larger than ANSI and intrascene contrast numbers. Bigger is better for marketing and is the same reason they quote screen sizes in diagonal measurements instead of width and response time in grey to grey instead of black to black. The numbers you quote in your video (3000:1 and 1000:1) are full field contrast numbers which are measured when the entire screen is at it's peak white output (white level) versus it's lowest output (black level). For dynamic contrast people should also know that in these dynamic contrast modes there is also something called dynamic gamma which occurs to compensate for brightness compression. If we simply lower the brightness of the light source the image will look dull and flat so manufacturers use some gamma adjustment to make the lighter highlights in the image brighter to compensate for the brightness loss.
@Baigle17 жыл бұрын
great info!
@alrawandi84025 жыл бұрын
When a viewer knows more about a certain topic than every other person on KZbin, and goes online to hunt these videos down and expose them. The kinda trolling I like
@maxpayne4387 жыл бұрын
this guy looks like linus
@andrewschulzsd7 жыл бұрын
Max Payne it is linus
@aRaskyl7 жыл бұрын
palmtree486 Whoosh
@sorry_Im_stupid_but4 жыл бұрын
No this guy's Linus's brother techquick
@Jcob_C4 жыл бұрын
@@andrewschulzsd woosh
@Jcob_C4 жыл бұрын
@@kdermott8748 ik its not reddit, i didnt put r/
@Layarion7 жыл бұрын
5:22 that baby is like "what did i just get myself into?"
@RetroHellspawn7 жыл бұрын
I'm glad that you explained Dynamic Contrast Ratio and its different forms, because I had been told in the past that these contrast ratio measurements have been just purely arbitrary from brand to brand, but this makes a ton more sense.
@MrDextroll7 жыл бұрын
Linus should be a WWE presenter
@JBreuel7 жыл бұрын
The main reason i watch so many of yalls videos is because of 5:20. I have learned a lot because of your videos which i appreciate a lot, but also the way you are with your kids is awesome. Kepp it up LMG!
@jasonbrittain71107 жыл бұрын
yours ago when LED was 1st coming out, I was actually told That each company had thier own set standard for what one unit of light Would-be. so the same panel test of the exact same way at 2 different companies would come-up with 2 different Contrast ratios.
@ABaumstumpf7 жыл бұрын
you need roughly a contrast of 10 000 : 1 to really reproduce what a human can see, and over 1 000 000 : 1 to encompass scenarios like being in bright sunlight and then going into a pitch black room. And contrast alone doesn't tell the whole story cause it only says how much brighter the brightest colour is in comparison to the darkest black. But you also need to know how dark the black can become. Otherwise you get a screen that in black scenes is still looking grey but can burn out your eyes with its brightness.
@lemmiix5 жыл бұрын
so what monitor do you recommend depending on the contrast ratio?
@mastergx17 жыл бұрын
I get the infinite contrast ratio on the OLEDs. If they can turn the pixel off completely, any number they give for the maximum brightness will be infinitely larger than zero.
@william9677 жыл бұрын
"Closely-er" - Linus Sebastian June 13, 2017
@lodbldbol7 жыл бұрын
He said closlier in another video.
@dwarkesh127 жыл бұрын
Can you make a video comparing ips, va, tn, etc. panels. Your last video is 4 years old.
@sweytank4 жыл бұрын
And now your comment is 3 years old. Yet nothing new, no video on that. Sedlyf
@michielolijslagers19037 жыл бұрын
Keep up the good work you guys, i've learned a lot from these video's. I do have a couple of suggestions for other video's (mainly network related): - Full duplex vs half duplex communication - MDIX (cisco feature to determine what sort of cable is connected) - ssh vs telnet - MAC address flooding - DHCP and DHCP spoofing, DHCP snooping - NTP (network time protocol) - VLAN and the types (default, data, native, management) - VoIP - Default gateway, Broadcast, Unicast, Multicast, Loopback - Load balancing - Static routes, Dynamic routing, Floating static routes - Router-on-a-stick (mainly used in VLAN's) - ACL - NAT and PAT I know there are a couple of them that are complicated to explain easy, but I hope that i see one or two of them apear on my screen.
@nO_d3N1AL7 жыл бұрын
I like the editing in these videos, keep it up! Makes it a lot easier to explain than just having a white screen with someone talking and adds value to the video
@JimClonk7 жыл бұрын
3:44 Isn't that sugar? It does have the cube shape salt usually has, but only partially.
@allanjmcpherson4 жыл бұрын
Since light output is always nonnegative, there actually isn't a problem treating a ratio relative to zero light as infinite, though it still isn't particularly helpful because it's the same regardless of the maximum brightness of the OLEDs.
@DETERMINOLOGY2 жыл бұрын
@ 1:40 this video is still valid. OLEDS look like the one on the left compare to LED/QLEDs that look on the right. Sure the one on the right is brighter by all means but the blooming / lack of contract kills it thus the picture on the left may be dimmer but the detail is perfect you dont lose any detail in the bright/dark areas and everything is balanced. Thus now a QLED isnt as bad as the one on the right but there is still blooming, Contrast is meh so they kinda represent each other in some type of way and with OLED having insane contrast it fits more with the picture on the left... Funny how old videos still relate as of today but the take away is i feel like contrast is what really makes the difference
@MYCHANNEL-lb1qq7 жыл бұрын
"one billion to one" *1,000,000 to 1 pops up behind him* They never fail to make me laugh
@jomialsipi7 жыл бұрын
I was expecting a "Over 9000" joke
@RynaxAlien5 жыл бұрын
Waiting for microLED displays. QLED displays offer great contrast and visual quality at lower cost
@kevinmoehring82597 жыл бұрын
"closelier" -Linus (2017) this vid was actually super helpful though. bravo.
@SCRedstone7 жыл бұрын
> Shows baby Me: hey, that's cute! Conspiracy Theorists: Linus' baby is just acting as a prop to have more people listen to his ad spots for him to receive more of that sponsor money.
@SCRedstone7 жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@harrysvensson26107 жыл бұрын
the divide by 0 => undefined is because you get different results when approaching 1/0 from left and 1/0 from right. 1/(0.1) grows positively while 1/(-0.1) grows negatively => they will not move towards a single point at really small values of x => undefined. Because using smaller positive values approaches +infinite while going from left approaches -infinite. And those are two very different places. But... in this case... it would be +infinite (not -infinite, and not undefined) contrast ratio because you would only use positive numbers. Meaning that you wouldn't take into account the left hand side (the negative numbers).
@ZLau137 жыл бұрын
Thanks for explaining dynamic contrast (and the huge ratios advertised with it).
@gbc90537 жыл бұрын
I wish I had 1:1 contrast ratio
@gbc90537 жыл бұрын
IT'S A JOKE!
@Goofygiggles7 жыл бұрын
GBCAwesome hue
@Ivannbeats4 жыл бұрын
GBC you would be bliiiind man
@ei..6 жыл бұрын
There is two monitors i have been looking at. One of them (by Philips) seems more appealing with extra features and stuff, and has 1000:1 contrast ratio and 10000000:1 dynamic. The other one (by AOC) does’t have the extra features and has almost the same specs on the panel with 1000:1 contrast ratio, but it has 20000000:1 dynamic contrast ratio. Should I go for the Philips one?
@rickshaw05137 жыл бұрын
I liked just for the baby
@Psykomancer7 жыл бұрын
Pervert.
@kevh63037 жыл бұрын
Actually, Linus is an adult, just very short.
@VincentReid6167 жыл бұрын
no he is a prop idiot thats why he doesn't give a fuck about reverence to anything. by dropping most of his sends on his vids causing damage time to get a new front man
@Kriae7 жыл бұрын
i'm glad he didn't drop the baby like usual
@ikhwanulfikribest6 жыл бұрын
what is the contrast ratio TBD, I found this in aqua tv specification?
@Markyroson7 жыл бұрын
2:35 "closelier" 😂
@GatsuRage3 жыл бұрын
i short.. should I or should I don't care if is 1000:1 or 3000:1? I'm looking to shop a monitor and I encounter one of 27" at 3000:1 and another one same price of 32 but 1000:1.... for gaming should I care?
@JakeTraver3 жыл бұрын
Was wondering the same thing. I looked at "Top Gaming Monitors of 2021", and they are all between 2500:1 - 3000:1. None of the millions:1. Which is how I ended up here. I'm getting this Samsung gaming monitor that is 3000:1, and we'll see how it goes.
@alphacentauri347 жыл бұрын
We all know the most important is that hips to waist ratio
@ruudygh2 жыл бұрын
i am confused. so sRGB is between 0-255, if a monitor have 1000:1 contrast, does that mean it is HDR?
@Rugg-qk4pl7 жыл бұрын
That photo comparing contrast ratios is so funny because my monitor has worse contrast ratio than either of them yet one is still darker than the other
@pickachublast87 жыл бұрын
Wow, my TV had a label "100,000:1" contrast and I was wondering, huh? But when you told me to look closlier, I saw "dynamic contrast" I'm mindblown
@theblondeglory2 жыл бұрын
This video helped me a lot! Thanks for making it to help inform the buyers
@kztech13197 жыл бұрын
I'm using one of the world's first ips panel - IDTech IAUX14S from 2001. it has 400:1 contrast ratio yet it still outperforms many laptop tn panels today
@v-xup67 жыл бұрын
so how does oled work with contrast ratio? blackest black on oled is off, so a million times brighter than off is still off...?
@Cade_Squirrel7 жыл бұрын
Meh... I have my eyes on a 4K LED HDR Sony Bravia, LCD technology is the tried and true technology that we know well and understand every aspect of it meaning we can get the most out of it, and LCD lasts for years, I'm always very wary of newer technology especially when it doesn't really add that much, LCD is just a trusted technology that I can be sure will serve me well, also low input lag and high Hz
@iwontliveinfear7 жыл бұрын
Two points: First: No two manufacturers use the same unit of measure when determining contrast ratios, therefore one brand's 3000:1 could actually be lower than another's 1000:1 Second: OLED isn't really "there" yet, and LCD contrast ratios still suck compared to my plasma display. Which, thanks to pixel shift has worked flawlessly for 5 years without any image retention. So what if I can't run at 4K, further than a foot away you would need an 80 inch panel to really tell the difference between 4k and 1080p.
@jur_esque7 жыл бұрын
2:35 What's up with Linus and "closlier"?
@ZeorGaming7 жыл бұрын
whats wrong with it?
@jur_esque7 жыл бұрын
He says that a lot and it confuses people that don't believe it's a word. He could easily say "closer" and get his point across just the same.
@zeromailss7 жыл бұрын
Jcnrose but it won't be as fun
@Rafael57YT7 жыл бұрын
Jcnrose then people should just learn the word and Google it. Not using the right word because people think it's not correct is ridiculous
@valderhide16747 жыл бұрын
Still can't believe Linus's hands ARE STILL STAINED from the thermal compound video
@LISTEDGames7 жыл бұрын
what about Brightness 250 cd/m² ???????
@meberg69587 жыл бұрын
Candles per square meter.
@spodeian7 жыл бұрын
I think an omega contrast ratio is more accurate, but if you want to go into accuracy we would have also noted the fact that the LED's are actually emitting light even while off meaning that contrast ratio is not infinite.
@nimbarkhirenkumar12263 жыл бұрын
Good But no any advice which to purchase VA, IPS or TN panel.
@Minecraft101ToonLink7 жыл бұрын
4:00 - "I told you not to divide by zero!!!" -Taran
@yasirer7 жыл бұрын
But OLED is still infinite, since the pixel goes down to completely zero black (turned off) then the difference between the black pixel and the on pixel is infinite. So what's with the 10M:1 contrast ratio? There shouldn't be a number to define it, It's ∞.
@ssamDJ7 жыл бұрын
MR. AWESOME To get the ratio for a screen you divide the highest brightness with the lowest brightness. So in the case of an OLED we get the division x/0 wich is undefined, not infinity.
@starone4207 жыл бұрын
2:40 to2:50 so they claim this the highest that can achieve so how we can know what's actual contrast ratio of the tv bcz oled r expensive anyone can explain please 🤔🤔🤷♂️?
@aomine68177 жыл бұрын
I just realized that even though linus channel is about high-end electronics, they still upload videos in 30fps
@wlsedlacek5 жыл бұрын
What's the contrast ratio of the notebook and monitor used?
@JaxDagger4 жыл бұрын
Question, im looking at 2 projectors 1. 10,000:1 ratio and 3500 lumens 2. 20,000:1 ratio and 2500 lumens due to the size of the projector and it being a projector will this heavily impact viewing if i go for the first one?
@joaquinbaquie33196 жыл бұрын
3:41 I'm sorry....I'm from Asia..so I couldn't understand that salt thing...(he sounds sarcastic) I just wanna know witch is good..10m:1 dynamic...or 80k:1 dynamic???!! please help me out...
@delta83887 жыл бұрын
"Dull Stars on a Charcoal background" perfectly describes an actual night in Baltimore, Md, And New York City, and Chicago IL.
@Kureiji-Desu7 жыл бұрын
i thought he was talking to Dennis there at the end XD
@goodoc82484 жыл бұрын
i was just watching linus's HDR video and now i'm here because i found a DCR setting on my monitor
@RoboticNerd7 жыл бұрын
Technically with oleds it is an infinite contrast ratio. A fully lit pixel is infinitely brighter than a totally black one. Infinity is weird. If you think about it, even 10 is infinitely bigger than 0 when you're thinking about it in this sense as 0 cannot be multiplied to equal anything but zero until you actually add something to it. So any number greater than zero is infinitely larger when comparing it in this way.
@ssamDJ7 жыл бұрын
Robotic Nerd But to get a ratio you divide the highest brightnes with the lowest. That gives you x/0 wich is undefined.
@RushilKasetty7 жыл бұрын
A Freaking Sandwich But if you use limits, it approaches infinity, which works well enough.
@ssamDJ7 жыл бұрын
True
@c503421820032 жыл бұрын
Very detailed explanation. Thanks 😊
@JackRyanFox7 жыл бұрын
So what would be considered the "on par" ratio to get?
@CrawfordAutomation7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this, was actually curious about this recently.
@rorygood99537 жыл бұрын
The picture on the TV was Samuel Beckett Bridge in Dublin
@guisgarcia5 жыл бұрын
This video was WAY better than I expected.
@gavindownes45417 жыл бұрын
why is the OLED red pixel a different shape different from the blue and green ?
@Addition27 жыл бұрын
I know it is a bit late to ask, but what is more important for a monitor/tv? sRGB coverage or contrast ratio?
@NPC-fg6up7 жыл бұрын
Im still a bit confused. So should i get a 1000:1 50 000 000:1 or 100 000 000:1 contrast ratio monitor. Im looking for the best possible quality picture.
@user-235907 жыл бұрын
i'm still amazed by my square LG monitor i bought ten years ago, it's a TN panel, and still has better contrast, viewing angles, and less bleeds than my new IPS and VA monitors.
@FerdiCildiz5 жыл бұрын
so should Ii buy a 1000:1 monitor?
@nathansiapno59667 жыл бұрын
I wish Linus would also talk about internet connection bufferbloat vs speed.
@Jeffrey3141597 жыл бұрын
0:50 "Brick and Mortar Stores"?
@Root1747 жыл бұрын
I don't know if they still do, but I remember how Samsung would often list "infinite" as their contrast ratio for their monitors.
@aidanjt7 жыл бұрын
I haven't seen infinite contrast bring advertised before, but I have to admit that I'd be curious about what it would be like to sit 5 metres away from the surface of Rigel. I can't imagine it'd be good for my health though, or my power bill, or the grid in general.
@Valtersss1237 жыл бұрын
Loving these FAP (Fast As Possible) series!
@TheEcorristine7 жыл бұрын
Well explained, clarity at last, oh and cool wrap up..
@noahw58877 жыл бұрын
I wish Plasmas were popular. They probably would have still been made if so. My TV has a 30,000:1 native contrast ratio and it still looks beautiful to this day even though it's been 9 years with it. No LCD/LED TV can come close. OLED looks amazing but the price not so much.
@adamikhsannugroho3 жыл бұрын
So should I enable DCR or no? main use is gaming and movie watching
@stigmsr17 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on refresh rate? It used to be 600Hz was good with plasma and 240Hz with 3D capable tv's was the norm. Now it seems with the 4K TV's they're mostly 120Hz with some sort of motion marketing hype word before 240 or higher like "Motion rate" or "Motion Flow XR". What's up?
@jlars2317 жыл бұрын
my tv is really old, and i calibrated it to make it look better. but in doing so i realised the calibration assumes a certain performance that my tv didnt have. so i made my own config where i pumped up the contrast and brought down the brightness. you lose a small ammount of detail in very dark scenes but overall it makes the tv look heaps better and ulitimately made me hold off on buying a new tv
@secretofgaming71857 жыл бұрын
4:18 "FreshBookS haS you covered."
@xperiago80497 жыл бұрын
are the contrast ratio and resolution independent? can hd display has higher contrast then fhd?
@drewbullet13185 жыл бұрын
This matters so much monitors have custom settings for Asus monitors they use ASCR mode for example it literally will change your gaming experience and even just watching tv.
@alwaysamongdragons73547 жыл бұрын
I always find it odd when visual examples are shown in a video like this. You need a high contrast monitor or the side-by-side examples will look exactly the same.
@alpzerlaken3 жыл бұрын
Will putting another polarlizer flim to the screen increase contrast ratio?
@MrBiggins997 жыл бұрын
So is a monitor with 1000:1 contrast ratio and DCR turned off good for gaming? Is getting any higher than that even necessary?
@motivational-f9j7 жыл бұрын
your the best bro big fan helped me to build my tech life and everything
@motivational-f9j7 жыл бұрын
please always update on computer tech like you always do because you really help
@lukebbx66282 жыл бұрын
What is the highest contrast ratio in a display? Like 80M:1?
@kurstxmo7 жыл бұрын
Thanks, this was just the explanation I was looking for. So would it make a noticeable difference between a monitor with a dynamic contrast ratio of 5,000,000:1 vs 10,000,000:1?
@reedcarpenter29943 жыл бұрын
Does contrast ratio matter on smaller TV's. Like 22"? I can choose a 22" with 4000 to 1 or 24" 800 to 1. Would I be able to tell a difference? Both native both the same brand and I would be watching TV on them not gaming
@ewcho89953 жыл бұрын
you would tell a huge difference. 800:1 is aweful. 4000:1 is pretty decent
@reedcarpenter29943 жыл бұрын
@@ewcho8995 even on a 22 inch?
@satellite9647 жыл бұрын
Contrast Ratio >>>>> Resolution
@craftyox7 жыл бұрын
1:10.000 minimum, if you cant find the ratio in the item info, odds are its less than that
@theignorantphilosopher48557 жыл бұрын
I suppose if individual pixels can be turned off, then the contrast ratio is actually infinite, though of course that could tell us nothing. It would still be infinite even if the brightest bright was barely noticeable. This of course leaves us, or at least me, with the question, what does these numbers actually mean, when it comes to OLED that is? Are they just arbitrary numbers which only function is to let us compare between panel types, or is reality somehow involved?
@Moejoe6477 жыл бұрын
Technically even an OLED panel doesn't have infinite contrast ratio, since there is no material in this world that is perfectly black.
@RustinHawver7 жыл бұрын
Aw... Look at the cute little baby! Congrats on a wonderful child!
@maverick6c6317 жыл бұрын
hey Linus, can you review the best mini projector for console gaming if someone wants portability to play multiplayer games with friends (eg. just dance, FIFA/PES, any co-op and splitscreen etc) ?