What is Energy & Work in Chemistry & Physics? - [1-1-6]

[@NickyGorinov]

Like a masterful conductor, you have orchestrated my journey of learning, transforming complex concepts into captivating melodies that resonate with understanding. Your passion for knowledge is contagious, igniting a spark of curiosity that will forever guide my path.

[@gentlej8865]

OMG, I feel like a genius whenever I watch any video lesson about physics and have full comprehension of it. Thank you sir.

[@MathAndScience]

Welcome!

[@silhouette4926]

Absolutely enjoying learning from these videos

[@frankdimeglio8216]

@@MathAndScience Consider what is E=MC2. c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Consider what is THE EARTH/ground. Consider what is E=MC2. Now, consider what is THE EYE; AND consider what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. SO, consider what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/as SPACE; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE; AS WHAT IS E=MC2 CLEARLY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, notice what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. Now, consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun ON BALANCE !! They are the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! CONSIDER WHAT IS E=MC2 ON BALANCE. Gravity is an interaction that cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE !!! Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE !!! c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Think. What is E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent. What is THE EARTH/ground is fully consistent with/as (AND IT IS BALANCED WITH/AS) what is E=MC2 (ON/IN BALANCE). BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE), AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Again, ON BALANCE, consider what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/as SPACE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! CLEARLY, I have mathematically proven and explained what is the fourth dimension. Magnificent. By Frank Martin DiMeglio

[@melvinhc]

I know the feeling of feeling smart, after watching this genius, versed in so many technical subjects. I have watched him dig into DNA and explained for example the 4 base pairs of DNA, and why Adenine and Guanine always connect together. That was one of my most eye-opening and fee-smart moments I've had while trying to grasp and understand New information.

[@yordanmishev6781]

I don't even need to watch, but just listen and I can hear how excited you are about it, that makes for a great teacher! Thank you!

[@MathAndScience]

Wow, thank you!

[@alixavien3462]

You are doing immeasurable contribution to science, i wish we could clone you and distribute them to every school as teachers

[@judithreyes4664]

Yes!! I agree😊

[@AR-tp2te]

LoL YES

[@agroxk]

you are the greatest tutoring channel I've ever seen ❤

[@georgep4465]

Such a pleasure to listen to a person who has a real gift (desire plus knowledge) for explaining

[@loipham31]

What makes lessons taught by Math and Science exciting is he links Physics and Chemistry perfectly. This can only be done by people who have best knowledge and understanding in science and nature.

[@MathAndScience]

Thank you so much!

[@franktrevorpagsuguiron973]

Thank you for this video! I started watching you back 2 years ago, and I aced all of my STEM related subjects because of you. Instead of doing it just for the grades, your videos hooked me into science and mathematics even more. Your videos definitely improved my skills. Advanced congratulations to your 1M subscribers!

[@MathAndScience]

Wow thanks so much. So happy to hear of your success! And thanks for the 1M kind words! Actually hard to believe it!

[@ottofrank3445]

Again very well explained. Your talent is that you make everybody understand the topic.

[@MathAndScience]

I really appreciate the nice comment!

[@syedshah4802]

Thank you so much for all your hard work you put in, It means the world.

[@MathAndScience]

I really appreciate your kind words!

[@channel4change430]

I am a seasoned employee working to enter into the field of Engineering Tech. My Masters is in Social Work. You are an excellent teacher. thank you bc this is so simple to understand and it matches my book to a "T".

[@user-abd_almer313]

الطاقة الكامنة : وهي الطاقة الغير مستثمرة ومثالها : الشخص الذي لديه طاقة مخزونة تجعله طبيبًا ، مهندسًا ، معماريًا .... العمل : هو استخدام الطاقة الكامنة ، وهو إنجاز شغل ما ، عبر مسافة . ملاحظة : يرتبط العمل ارتباطًا وثيقًا بالطاقة الكامنة . رمز المسافة : d . رمز القوة : f . القوة الثابتة : مثل الدفع بقوة ثابتة لا تتغير . القوة الغير ثابتة : مثل الدفع بقوة غير ثابتة تتغير وستدخل في التكامل والتفاضل لذا لن يأخذها . رمز الشغل : w . معادلة الشغل : القوة × المسافة . او رياضيًّا : W = F . D وحدة المسافة : m / المتر . وحدة القوة : n / نيوتن . وحدة الشغل : j / الجول . اما الناتج فسيكون جول بالثانية مثال : W ( 3 ) = F ( 3 ) . D ( 1 ) => 3 J/S الطاقة الكامنة مثلًا اذا صعدت عاليًا راح تزداد واذا سقطت صرفتها للتوضيح : صندوق |_| صندوق ٢ |_| ________ _________ ارض ارض ايضًا الصندوق ٢ لديه طاقة كامنة اقل لذلك لن يكون سقوطه كقوة سقوط صندوق ١ . القوة الكامنة : الكتلة مضروبة بالجاذبية والارتفاع PE = mgh g = m/s² H = m M = kg الطاقة الحركية : الطاقة الكامنة مخزونة مثل سحب الشريط المطاطي اذا تركته تكونت عندك الطاقة الحركية . KE = 1/2 mv² الطاقة الحركية = نصف ضعف الكتلة وسرعة الجسم سرعة الجسم m/s الكتلة kg المثال على الطاقة الكامنة والحركية : لديك مدينة ملاهي فيها افعوانية كالتالي 1 _ 2 \ / _ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / ________\ /___\ /___ اذا كنت على أي ارتفاع سواء ١ او ٢ فانك لديك طاقة كامنة محددة حسب الارتفاع والمسافة والخ ، وإذا نزلت فأنت هنا تستخدم الطاقة الحركية . اتذكر ان الدكتور قال الجاذبية أقوى بملايين المرات من القوة الكهربائية ؟ هنا ستستفاد من هذه المعلومة . القوة الجاذبية F = G ( ثابت الجاذبية ) أس ( m¹m²/r²) هذا ليس درسًا للفيزياء لذلك ابحث عن ثابت الجاذبية في الفيزياء . R المسافة بين الاجسام M = kg كيلوجرام R = m متر F = N نيوتن القوة الكهربائية F = K ( q¹q²/r²) Q هو شحنة الجسم K هو ثابت الكهرباء R المسافة بين متر الاجسام

[@LouXio]

One of the best lesson I had. I wish my high school Can be like you. Thanks.

[@kville5796]

Your work is truly outstanding, Professor. Your expertise in your field is unparalleled, and I am grateful for the knowledge you have shared with us. Thank you for being an inspiration and setting the bar high for all of us striving to make a difference.

[@Christian1846-c4s]

I thought that I was just slow to pick up these kinds of concepts since I had to pause the video, and then replay it again as it's hard for me to sink numbers in my mind. Thanks for making this topic digestible for everyone.

[@Divine-n7v]

Sir you are the best science and math teacher in the world. I have watched all of your videos.

[@MathAndScience]

Wow thank you so much!!!

[@frankroper3274]

This is the type of science that is interesting to me! It's the kind of science we deal with every day but never think about it.

[@MathAndScience]

Very true!

[@joesephrameka6616]

Thankyou Jason for taking and sharing your time to making these lectures. I saved your lectures in a playlist and I watch them like I'm right there in class, ready to learn. Basically, I turned my playlist into a school, and I have you as one of the teachers in the playlist.

[@ahsanrubel2869]

You speak rightfully that we should think problems in terms of energy! You are best in business sir!

[@Aukage]

The explanations being offered in these lessons are almost priceless. I may have been too young to pay attention or understand when in school ... but now that I'm older WOW are the ideas resonating within me. That said, my high school physics teacher would have failed me if I said the answer to the KE problem was 1.94x10^5 J. Based on significant figures, it should be 1.9x10^5 J. But again - exceptionally well explained.

[@Sawdust6666]

Im really grateful for these lectures. You're so clear and concise with your explanations. Thank you very much. I look forward to watching the whole series.

[@EnlightenedEndeavor]

Turned this for my 7 y.o, he enjoyed. To my surprise. It was good for me as well, to refresh my school program.

[@MathAndScience]

Awesome!

[@tubeyourom]

Awesome approach to the knowledge of energy. Practical.

[@ChristineMicancin]

The continuity of your teaching is so beautiful. Thank you so much. You help me be a better teacher for my students.

[@fahimkhalasi4115]

thank you i did not realise you can relate energy to both chemistry and physics

[@glenmartin2437]

Thank you. Good pedagogy makes a real difference!

[@dianatrejos8346]

One of the BEST professors. Ever Thank you so much for your passion for your knowledge and the way you really teach. Your technique makes sense and is an easy way to understand those topics. Thank you

[@djaberbenhayane8094]

47:04 What about endothermic reactions Sir? They absorbe heat to lead atoms from higher to lower energy stat? Or ftom lower to higher energy stats?

[@MoonArrowTarot]

Thank you so much! Your organized, concise, and colorful visuals combined with the manner in which you break down the information is 👌🏼 Very grateful to be watching your videos❤

[@tosinogunfowora2596]

Your lessons has helped me to be top 2 in my class

[@kingoffire9373]

Thank you so much for these videos, such clear and passionate explanation! There is only one thing in this video that maybe I missed or maybe it wasn't really important enough to note but I kept thinking the whole time you were talking about potential energy, you never really touched on how something gains potential energy, the energy that has to be put into it for it to be stored. Like lifting the box or clicking up the roller coaster. Anyways, most people should know that but I kept thinking it might make it come full circle for some people a little bit more. Not to criticize, I know you understand it much better than I do and have years of doing this, that was just one thing that I kept listening for is all.

[@joshlikestobeanerd2125]

thank you so much for the work that you’ve done (God Bless You). You’re a true teaching talent.

[@Louminati00]

i'm not trying to says he's wrong but @17:23 he says he would have more potential energy on a ladder then on the floor isn't it the exactly the same amount of potential energy because gravity is acting the same no matter your level but the only difference is on the ground the potential energy is unrealized like if the floor fell out from under you gravity acts with the same amount of force

[@Azealothe]

He is correct, when you are on the ground you do not have any or very little potential energy. If you are on the top of the ladder you have a higher potential energy however as you move down the ladder or even fall off the ladder that potential energy is doing "work" (energy is being used to move something through space) and that work converts the potential to kinetic as kinetic energy is the energy of motion. Whereas potential energy has the "potential" to do work or move if allowed such as the elastic example he gave

[@vestepharpersuasion]

This was a great lesson, thank you! I also screen shotted the two atoms you drew because you inadvertently created a smiley face 😀, so some hidden fun!

[@gabrielshaughnessy6523]

You've got it and I congratule you 👏🏻 Energy is everything. This is the stuff that makes me appreciate science. I loved your physics overview and electrical engineering stuff. You know what's important and have synthesized the value

[@Kmdtigger]

Chemistry is relative to physics. This was a very good lesson. I'm taking chemistry in the fall and wanted to know what I was getting into and came across you channel. Thank you I think I will enjoy the class in the fall.

[@felixyongco4420]

He is a Godvsent maths and science tutor. He explains more in details based on the previous lessons and. will proceed accordingly to the course direction.. Thank your. Sir. Jason for all your patience .. I can. remember. .. 32 ft / sec / sec . I also. can remember that ... WORK = FORCE X DISTANCE and. where. : F .. is in pound ( lb ) d...is measured in ( feet ) always .. UNTIL. . System International ( S I ) came. along .. learning and. Engineering measurement. changed. to. ... newton .. ( Force. ) meter ... ( distance. ) It is. hard for me , but I. feel. happy. with. Sir. Jason guiding me in understanding the. subject. matter and. other. students too... Very. good educational blessing. and help..

[@guyver268]

Great revision of what I learnt at school and university 50-odd years ago.

[@analogman3070]

At the beginning of this video the information you were ABOUT to share had the HIGHIST POTENTIAL ENERGY. At the end of the video the information I received in my brain has the HIGHEST kinetic energy. Am I sorta close? LoL

[@teyronnewreality]

That was a fascinating lesson. Thank you for taking the time to explain.

[@marziehlotfi4799]

thanks for your nice explanation, could you please relate the kinetic energy to work like what you did for potential energy?

[@josemello649]

Great class, thank you...

[@ursulagwozdz1955]

Thank you,Jason Gibson.

[@MathAndScience]

Welcome!

[@ruthaban2631]

Thank Sir for the very comprehensive explanation about the topic

[@mikecameraaction.]

I'm from India's rural area, thanks so much for making such informative video

[@tresajessygeorge210]

It is a very good lesson and excellent teaching...!!! THANK YOU... SIR...!!!

[@richardlankford8851]

Awesome teacher who made a difficult subject much simpler for me to understand.

[@허유선-y4m]

What a magnetic lecture it is!

[@edifonabasiumoh42]

I love you and i someday want to teach like you because you are really a science genius

[@MathAndScience]

You flatter me! I am sure you will excel in your studies!

[@АлександрКозеев-е2ф]

I really liked this video series, where can I watch the following parts? For example 1-1-7? ( i think this is Nature of energy - part 2 probably?)

[@muttonchops953]

Thank you! Awesome video.

[@1abeyabraham]

Thanks for the class . It reach all over the world. Which increases the knowledge of common people.

[@dayhaysuper3639]

at 28:00 he talks about burning (combustion) and is a very helpful explanation.

[@MathAndScience]

Thanks so much.

[@shoshannagardiner6083]

Soooo helpful! Love this guy.

[@andyrandy2278]

As always wonderful lessons!

[@MathAndScience]

Thank you!

[@brucewinningham4959]

Can the Total Atomic Numbers involved be an indicator of the amount of Energy involved in a Chemical Reaction,? For instance -- Does the production of Hydrochloric Acid from H2 + Cl2 ....... Require more Energy than the production of Water from H2 + O2?

[@gorillagaming1117]

So is the constant crashing waves of electrons on the nucleus what is making the quarks energized or move?

[@mohalbeheiry9231]

Really enjoyed this lesson

[@chunchun73]

Ma greatest teacher 🎉

[@brooklyn.Q]

Ohce again, a well explained concept

[@nikis7742]

Really appreciate for your hard work to make people understand what reality of science is you are brilliant and great great teacher you deserve atleast millions views on your most videos 🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@MathAndScience]

Thanks so much. I appreciate your kind words!

[@alchemy1]

Perhaps it is worthy of mentioning..... as you said only you wished if someone had explained it to you right from day one. Based on that, the following maybe worthy of consideration. You brought up Watt ( as if from nowhere), then explained it as joule/second. Lets wrap it nicely so it stands out clear. Maybe? So here we go: There are two types of joules. Mechanical joule and electromagnetic joule if you will. Mechanical joule (work) is when 1kg of mass accelerating to a distance of 1 meter in the time frame of 1 second. Power is the measurement of this work/second. I.e. Mechaical joule/second. Electric Joule: Displacing a coloumb of charges through a potential difference of 1V overcoming 1 ohm of resistance in one second. Notice how in this set up there is no mention of distance but mere displacement, more like some cross section if you will as if people just passing a door opening. That is rather interesting when it comes to electric joule. Thus; watt is this joule/second. Is this about right?

[@NobS019]

Sir, Im always a little confused on the idea that if we define something in physics like W=F•S, how does that quite align with our reality? I mean, does work really exist in the real world or energy? We cant see these things so how does it make sense HOW DID THE FOUNDERS 'FOUND' THE EXPRESSION FOR WORK OR FORCE OR ENERGY. I understand in case of velocity or acceleration, scince we can see them in an object. EVEN MOMENTUM??? HOW DOES THESE EQUATIONS MEAN ANYTHING?? PLEASE HELP ME. 1.F=ma 2.W=F•S 3.p=mv How does these 3 formulas make any sense in the real world.

[@nakamyamilly]

Hello thank you for teaching me🎉

[@nakamyamilly]

You are the best

[@វិទ្យាល័យអប់រំ]

Very nice 👍👍👍👍❤

[@shivanshverma7000]

Hello sir,I am 15 year old Indian ,and I want some guidance from you regarding chemistry ,well sir it goes like this.....i didn't study even a bit in covid lockdown, and now the schools are open, i am completely blank in the subject.......i literally dont know anything regarding chemistry...i now just watched your introduction of chemistry (6 year old video) ,it helped a bit ....but what should I do now ........like which videos, or topics should I start .....sir plz help I beg of you ...the anxiety is eating me inside out......plz sir I beg of you ....

[@ciriloguisadio8260]

Great teacher...

[@ciriloguisadio8260]

Thank you, great teacher...

[@Ebonyqwe]

If you had antimatter then could that mean the gravity formula could give you a repelling force (I.e. a negative number like you get if the + vs - in the electric force equation)?

[@samsonwills9965]

Thank you Jason...you kinetic me...

[@fahimkhalasi4115]

thank you for linking energy to chemistry and physics

[@kristoferdahlgren2783]

Hello! In which package can i find this leasson?

[@ryannguyen8886]

Where were you when I was in these classes. I did well in physics but it’s just remote memorization- there is no context to connect concept

[@mohalbeheiry9231]

You are great teacher thank you

[@lncompetentGaming]

Thank you for your fantastic video and enthusiasm! Also first!

[@MathAndScience]

Welcome and thank you!

[@MykmotoTv]

happy 1 million subscriber sir jason😀

[@MathAndScience]

Thank you - almost there!!

[@ot7saranghae124]

exquisite class

[@santoshlikhite1846]

❤ thanks teacher

[@coolloser85]

How do I support this man

[@Nodalthree]

Excellent

[@MuslimahForLife27]

What is the difference between Work and Kinetic Energy?

[@neeuqollav2224]

where is part 2? 🥺 I notice that whenever there is part one, there is no part 2..

[@miladhussein5411]

From Iraq and see your lesson 💜

[@smzakirhussain7604]

You are only like you, Sir.

[@muhammadmuflih1157]

thank you very much Man

[@PP-gr5xs]

Hi, thank you Sir. Have a nice day.

[@MathAndScience]

You too!

[@RobinMyaing]

wht happened to lesson-1-1-5 ?

[@agm1992]

Thank you very much,Sir!

[@MathAndScience]

Welcome!

[@gatdetriekthian-py8nv]

What's the different between psychic and mathematics

[@lifelight9789]

where is episode 5? please

[@thedeadmansstory3049]

great!

[@Mikiyasshegaw]

come on men i don't have to go to school anymore if you keep up with this lessons

[@kokibuchek5635]

Amazing.

[@hichamarroub2276]

Omg you are too close to reach 1M subs

[@MathAndScience]

Yes so close!!! Maybe tomorrow! Thank you so much!

[@ramsundarpanda754]

Please make a video of optics...

[@MathAndScience]

Will do!

[@ahlawy-news]

Where's part two? ,Teacher I searched a lot

[@fahimkhalasi4115]

thank you

[@kamalibrathwaite]

What if the potential energy is at ZERO when on the ground, and the ground caved in, will you go from O to negative numbers?

[@Omniverse99]

No, energy is scalar( meaning only has quantity not direction) so when you cave in you will create new height(still positive number)

[@kamalibrathwaite]

@@Omniverse99 Thanks

[@carultch]

@@kamalibrathwaite I disagree with your previous respondent. Potential energy can be negative. It just means that the potential energy is less than the potential energy at the location we arbitrarily define as zero. For GPE on this planet where g is close enough to uniform, this just means you pick a location, give it a zero z-position, and anything lower than that z-position will have negative potential energy. Usually you pick a location such as the floor, the ground, or sea level as this datum. It ultimately is differences in potential energy that you care about, so where you define zero potential energy makes no difference in any applications of the concept. For GPE in the universal sense, with GPE = -G*M*m/r, there is a convention to establish GPE to equal zero, when r=infinity. This is simply for mathematical convenience, because we simply set the +C term equal to zero, after integrating, so we keep it simple and don't need to determine what C equals. For electric potential energy, if there is a location where positive EPE exists, then if you simply switch the sign of the charge, you would then have negative EPE at that same position. Again, EPE is defined with an arbitrary datum just like GPE, and it is ultimately differences in EPE that we care about.

[@akikotsukamoto1334]

But at the bottom, the box is not moving, and KE seems to be zero.

[@zaynfanmalik4411]

think you sir very mutch your explecation is very eazey

[@MathAndScience]

Thank you!