Check out some more of my Global Politics videos here! kzbin.info/aero/PL-MZyeaK_bhvgZfBQ_AfjizWO27-YzXeB
@thucanhnguyenho69664 жыл бұрын
The video is so helpful. Thank you ! International Studies is not a fear for me anymore.
@KorczyksClass4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for your kind words!! I'm so glad my video was able to connect with you. :)
@dexmuc43 жыл бұрын
I’m doing a bachelor undergrade of international studies
@tonystark5593 жыл бұрын
one of the most friendliness teacher ever
@KorczyksClass3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!! I'm glad you think so. Thanks for watching! 😊
@melaiawaisale10812 жыл бұрын
Doing an assignment for polisci and your videos have helped me immensely. Thank you!
@KorczyksClass2 жыл бұрын
I'm glad you found them helpful! Best of luck in your Poli Sci class. :)
@pcrato06272 жыл бұрын
Amazing introduction on liberalism! Keep up the good work!
@KorczyksClass2 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I hope you found it helpful!
@reishamaharani84492 жыл бұрын
Hi! Just want to say that your video is really helpful, thank you! I really mean it✨ glad i found this channel
@KorczyksClass Жыл бұрын
I'm so glad!
@q-mansion1452 ай бұрын
Nice work ,keep it up ❤
@KorczyksClass16 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@davidmurra65664 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video! It is very helpful.
@KorczyksClass4 жыл бұрын
You're very welcome! Thanks for watching! I'm glad it helped. 👍
@aisteadomaviciute44093 жыл бұрын
your videos are so detailed! thank you
@KorczyksClass3 жыл бұрын
I'm glad you found it helpful! Thank you! 😊
@shereeheihei56233 жыл бұрын
Thank you it's so helpful, I greatly appreciated it. I hope this happens in my life
@KorczyksClass3 жыл бұрын
I'm glad you found it helpful. All the best!
@chidinmauba61212 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much for your video ☺️ I have a question though? Is liberalism same as Idealism? Thank you!
@Diademic111 Жыл бұрын
I think Liberalism is the easiest of the theories to understand and it's also not so saturated in paranoia
@rynor71323 жыл бұрын
Sho how would liberalism handle a conflict between competing states? For example. Right now China is exercising dominance in the south china Sea and is claiming rights according to the 9 dash line. China's neighbors disagree and believe China is encroaching on its territorial rights with regard to their waterways. let's say China decided to occupy one of the land features in the Spratly Islands that the Philipines claims belong to them. How would America, under the Paradigm of LIberalism respond to this situation?
@KorczyksClass3 жыл бұрын
This is definitely a tough one! China's actions would certainly be better explained by Realism in this case. If the USA was acting under a liberal paradigm, they would seek to pressure China to change course through liberal institutions, for example, like the United Nations. (Obviously would be ineffective with China holding a veto on the security council). .. or perhaps through multilateral sanctions, in an effort to maintain the stability of the liberal order. Liberalism relies on states acting liberally, and the world increasing in democracy, and China in general is a challenge to that.
@rynor71323 жыл бұрын
@@KorczyksClass I argue it is nearly impossible to employ liberalism to address a crisis where the adversarial nation is a realist. that just does not seem to work no matter how i think about it.
@rynor71323 жыл бұрын
@@KorczyksClass Yes, that is what i thought, the US would use the United Nations but China has also shown a propensity to disregard rulings by world bodies such as the dispute between China and the Philipines in 2012 which the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) ruled against China.
@ayoubhamdi13 жыл бұрын
@@rynor7132 What if real decision makers of all world powers give zero regard or genuine belief in Liberalism and its glamorous objectives? What if politically the world today is three-dimensioned, namely the real decision-makers, the intellectuals (politicians, press, the elite etc) and the rest, where the first dimension/category has its own doctrine (I claim it to be absolute REALISM), whereas the second and the third share the same aspirations and glamor of Liberalism? After all, the reality check says that the biggest liberal states, the icons of Liberalism themselves are implementing the complete opposite of Liberalism in a way that's more obvious than ever. Away from books and theory; reality says it all...my humble opinion and (objective, I hope) observation.
@shahabmesgarzade28413 жыл бұрын
Hi, as I found your video so helpful, I was wondering if you have any video about marxism and constructivism theory ???
@KorczyksClass3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words! Unfortunately I don't have videos about those. They're definitely on my list of videos to make. I do have a video on realism vs. Liberalism you can check out here though: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fp2XZHWfr6yXa8U And one specifically on realism: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Zp2vZ36MeMibars
@RighteeTighty3 жыл бұрын
Liked how you explained it, very clear, I finished Liberalism by Ludwig von Mises. My problem with Liberalism is that it assumes the people desire the same. 1 thing if its a small homogenous community; race, religion, culture. How can it work on a ship where no1 agree on the direction/destination? At best we all vote & end up where no1 wanted to really go. Especially on a global scale. This is why I love Hobbes, but where his for the state, I'm like pro-monarchy where Christ is King. We'll accept a Republic, but 16th & 17th amendment. Honestly their a list but capitalism, education, etc via a moral frame work. It takes virtuous people to uphold a Nation; after all, what's the point if not communities of strong families?
@VisibleMRJ2 жыл бұрын
Liberalism should get rid of all your military power so that others can believe in liberalism also.
@Nasserist19692 жыл бұрын
Iraq 2003 Libya 2011 Disproves Liberalism and makes Realism the true law of IR.