The mellow music in the background makes your presentation easier and more enjoyable to listen to.
@krevisj13 жыл бұрын
SUPER helpful for my Master's level epidemiology course! Thank you so much!
@juliecarson55843 жыл бұрын
I second that!
@marwaalrubaiy76623 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much.. Iam doing master degree in community medicine in Iraq and this part of epidemiology just made me cry.. I watched your presentation and everything was so clear..
@thomaswentworth64334 жыл бұрын
You sir, are truly awesome. Far, far better explained than in my introduction to epidemiology book. Thank you.
@margarettrimble15843 жыл бұрын
So clear and professional...thank you! This is a terrific supplement to my epidemiology course!
@lesliethompson19953 жыл бұрын
You are my hero! Thank you!!! Very helpful for my health & mortality demography class. Thank you thank you thank you!!!
@AyushKumar-so7ry2 жыл бұрын
You saved me buddy, I cracked an offer letter today. Thanks a lot.
@TheHealthMatters4 жыл бұрын
really helped me understand whilst trying to navigate my undergraduate Bachelor Health Science Epidemiology Unit thank you!
@vanjaXP3 жыл бұрын
Excellent video, completely answered the questions i had.
@dr.navidsoltani43264 жыл бұрын
Hey Justin, your material is just absolute gold. Thank you so much for maintaining and sharing such clear tutorials. Do you use anything besides Excel? I would love to see your concepts applied in a stats workflow, say for example with Python/Pandas or R.
@memememe38783 жыл бұрын
thanks for making this so much easier to understand compared to how my lecturer explained
@nitranjan90654 жыл бұрын
Exactly, similar analysis, me and my wife (statistical) have discussed. Thank you very much for detailed explanation.
@aonmay8947 Жыл бұрын
That is a super clear explanation!!!!
@ragulshan64904 жыл бұрын
Thanks for an amazing video. if you didn't put up this video, i would have believed what media says about kerala vs India.
@aleek91803 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooo much for this video. It helped me understand way better for Epidemiology
@fetabrown4 жыл бұрын
Hugely helpful, the explanation and graphics made it really clear. Thank you!
@nkosivumilezhou83743 ай бұрын
This guy is the best better than my teacher🔥😂
@chickteghen90982 жыл бұрын
Cameroon ECID, Hello, Clear and concise... Thank you
@SagaContinu4 жыл бұрын
Good video, good diagrams. Appreciate your effort ZED. Will be going through the rest of the series.
@bushrazaman98823 жыл бұрын
Nicely explained . Thanks
@fernandojackson720710 ай бұрын
Great presentation. How would you go about finding, testing for possible/potential counfounding factors if, e.g., you didn't know of the effects of age in rate of disease?
@epiminutesbykazi2 жыл бұрын
Excellent! Very clear explanation with COVID-19 as an example made the talk very contemporary and understandable to all. Thank you.
@onceee9243 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, it's very easy and understandable once i watch this video and I love how you explain it. Big thanks!
@user-fo3ug3cr4m2 жыл бұрын
How would the calculation look like if I wanted to standardise for another variable e.g. male-female-distribution in the comparing countries?
@honouraf4 жыл бұрын
Sooo helpful! Love how you explained it! Thank you!!
@Pickett13122 жыл бұрын
Stunning stuff!
@atropabelladonna9974 жыл бұрын
The best explanation ever!!
@kayodeolofinro15702 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation, this will help my test.
@gabrielburcea95784 жыл бұрын
a bit confused on how exactly you get the mortality rates in the standard population. it will help a newbie like me to understand exactly how you get the mortality rates in the standard population at step 1, although you mention before step 1. Nevertheless, I find this movie very helpful. Additionally, it will help emphasising on when to use the indirect standardisation vs. direct standardisation . I am saying this because indirect standardisation may apply to a dataset that does have low numbers for age group.
@ge0rgeth0mas Жыл бұрын
34 years living in Kerala and I just find out that we have a flag. Well explained video. 👍🏻 But when should we use direct standardisation and when should it be indirect?
@sreeram2050 Жыл бұрын
When the age specific death rates of two or more populations are known, we will go for direct standardisation. On the other hand , when the age specific rates of the population of interest are unknown , indirect standardisation is to be applied. Even I am seeing the flag of Kerala for the very first time [mallu here :) ]
@appliedstatistics20432 жыл бұрын
Justin I wish you could start a series about time series ARIMA model!!!
@xcastcastone90073 жыл бұрын
So helpful! I wonder is it possible to use standardization to standardize other rate, such as morbidity rate or hospital admission rate? or is it only specific for standardize mortality rate? and do we always need to standardize every data we read before making interpretation? I really appreciate if you could answer my questions....
@redwanulislam67162 жыл бұрын
Yes possible for any numeric variable
@VictorOrdu3 жыл бұрын
I think KZbin needs to add a feature where, if you downvote a video, you have to state why! I just don't get it. I have a question, though. In the India example (direct standardization), when computing the standardized rates by age group, isn't Kerala part of the standard population for the rest of India? Wouldn't it have been better to do this computation, **excluding** Kerala?
@amysprouse13572 жыл бұрын
YOU'RE A GENIUS! THANK YOU!!!
@drnitishpanghal13922 жыл бұрын
Recommended book for demography and population studies?
@timy87492 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video! But I think the 1.2 standardized mortality at the end of the video should be compared to India's 1.7 rather than Karala's 2.2. Because you are applying Karala's death rate over to the Indian population, the 1.2 means if India had Karala's rate, India's number would have been 1.2 instead of 1.7.
@aviejaypaul65682 жыл бұрын
I think so too.
@anmolpardeshi31383 жыл бұрын
What if we want to adjust for multiple factors. For example race and sex along with age. This tabular method would become complex. So how would be deal with that?
@junaidshaikh27454 жыл бұрын
Hi Zed, Thank you for sharing. What do you infer, If the crude mortality rate is less than the Standardised mortality rate?
@sarayassin97092 жыл бұрын
minute:8:11 is the calculation correct for pop 2.2 and 7.1? im getting a different answer: 2.2/1000*5,900,000= 12980 and 7.1/1000 *1,400,000= 9,940 . am i doing the math correctly? or am i missing something
@duckcluck1234 жыл бұрын
Is it possible to estimate an age adjusted rate when you know the crude rate of death of a whole population and the age distribution of the population, but you don't know the rates of deaths for each age group?
@rlamb76392 жыл бұрын
This is exceptionally useful information. I am curious how it might relate to a mortality rates within a population. For example, in your examples related to COVID, you are evaluating mortality rates for the entire population (there are 5 million people here and 1000 died of COVID19), rather than saying there are 5 million here and 500,000 were diagnosed with COVID19 and of those, 1000 died. How might we account for age distribution with this? Would we still use the "all in" standard population or would our new standard population become just those 500,000 who had COVID19? Thanks in advance!
@univuniveral97134 жыл бұрын
Yo, bruh, just got a notification about your new video. Well done. I have a question: In linear regression, have you every experienced a dramatic increase in R2 and errors after standardising the predictor variables? That is happening to me as we speak. Any explanations?
@Uncertaintycat3 жыл бұрын
How would I compare deaths by age from one year to the next? The age groups always stay the same, but my populations grow and deaths grow as well.
@derekjsmith76623 жыл бұрын
Nicely explained!!!!
@hsingkao20244 жыл бұрын
Wonder how to identify the cause(s) of the significant difference between groups?
@jeevanpati19934 жыл бұрын
Hi Zed, how do i connect to you? mail or anything. And also in categorical x variables-advanced regression, couldn't understand the dummy variable trap thing. what exactly is it. either of agecat 1 , 2 , 3, 4 can be one. so if we are using all the agecat variables, then only all the data points will be considered in regression right. not clear, can you explain? thaNKS
@kalpeshprajapati33584 жыл бұрын
Clear explanation! Thanks!
@jafetilonga15893 жыл бұрын
Super helpful, thanks 😊
@Afshu973 жыл бұрын
nice explanation
@ThanzeelAhmed3 жыл бұрын
Hi I'm a demography student from KERALA, India
@cha16453 жыл бұрын
This is a good tutorial. Please dont post subtitle above the calculations. It's a little uncomfortable. Thanks for the explanation. Tc
@shayaandanish58313 жыл бұрын
Where'd you get the intro music from?
@anmolpardeshi31383 жыл бұрын
Why is indirect method not preferred? i.e. comparison after indirect method is not valid
@trishi124 жыл бұрын
what is the general population? white people? and what are the confounding factors?
@noel_214 жыл бұрын
I think the general population is everyone, including the test population.
@abdulqaadir65102 жыл бұрын
You're amazing!
@mahbubhasantonmoy55554 жыл бұрын
It totally clear my confusion.
@mariamalhosani23513 жыл бұрын
You are my savior
@Traveller_OP3 жыл бұрын
Nice example !
@loganynguyen4 жыл бұрын
Is this the same as normalization?
@wayfaring.stranger3 жыл бұрын
your disclaimer at 13:20 didn't age very well... lol