What Makes the EA-18G Growler the King of Electronic Warfare?

[@Interestingengineeringofficial]

⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out! *SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE

[@johnherbold5451]

I don't believe that the EA-18G ("Growler") has a 20mm canon like the Super Hornet does. There's no room for it on the Growler!!

[@katoblow100]

It doesn't. It has no guns whatsoever.

[@KnightOps290]

Was about to get in the comment section and say this. Lol

[@fishnchips5826]

It doesnt, it has a cover for the gun hole to make it slightly more aerodynamic.

[@georgen9755]

cutting off communication was a clever way to turn down faculty return to sender ? whose post . no reply ???? who answered all the inbox posts of my personal email

[@fly69er1]

They do carry Aim-120s. Air to Air Missiles.

[@liamlogan669]

"We do a microscopic amount of trolling" - EA18 Growler Pilot and Electronic Warfare Officer

[@WarGasm0824]

They had to ditch the M-61A1 in favor of electronic warfare equipment. It can fly unescorted because it can carry the AIM-9X high off boresight Sidewinder and AIM-120D AMRAAM Scorpion.

[@brett327]

No AIM-9X on Growler... not yet, anyway.

[@alexyoutubeacct]

@@brett327 The Aussies fly with the 9X, interestingly enough, because they paid for the testing. We, however, still do not.

[@MWL4466]

Ok, the Growler is now officially my favorite military jet. So cool !!

[@chuckdales5605]

This is one good-looking aircraft!

[@trippleoseven]

Ugly plane imo

[@Warhorse469]

I agree it's a very good-looking aircraft

[@Edgeverse]

It looks so similar to the F-18. What a beast!

[@nisarullah2969]

Send it to Ukraine if it servy then approved and tested. If it met the same fate as patriot missiles system then toy jet.

[@Edgeverse]

@@nisarullah2969 Perhaps that wouldn't be the best option? Maybe what Ukraine really needs is one of the Eurofighters like the Grippen or the JAAS 39.

[@angusmatheson8906]

​​@@nisarullah2969 🤡 💩 🇷🇺 💩 🤡 lmao wut? Ukraine hasn't lost even a single element of any of its Patriot batteries. Stop listening to Peskov. Idi nahui, Cyka Ruz katsap orc scum. Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 Heroyam Slava!!

[@fishnchips5826]

@@nisarullah2969 the growler have been serving in multiple conflict. What other prove do you need?

[@angrymitch1566]

@@nisarullah2969you mean the patriot system that’s still there and functioning? Congrats you hit one piece of a multi piece air defense system

[@GasperAlcaide]

Extra-outstanding Us. 🦅 Force superiority innovation ! Dale 🦅

[@whalehands]

Besides the f35, i think this is the most potent aircraft in the sky. Imagine if the AF did this with the f15ex.

[@moonasha]

seriously, it makes me nervous we don't really have a replacement in the works for the growler.

[@MillerJLee]

Makes me wonder what the AF is using for the wild weasel role now

[@trumanhw]

To get an idea of just how underpowered the F-18 series is: 2 × F-414-400 produce 44,000 lb, wet (just over the F-35A single TurboFan) F-15 EX - DRY General Electric - F110-GE-129: 17,000 lb-ft × 2 F-15 EX - WET General Electric - F110-GE-129: 29,500 lb-ft × 2 (in AB) F/A-18E - DRY General Electric - F414-400: 13,000 lb-ft × 2 F/A-18E - WET General Electric - F414-400: 22,000 lb-ft × 2 (in AB) F-22 - DRY Pratt & Whitney F119-PW-100: 26,000 lb-ft each or 52,000 × 2 F-22 - WET Pratt & Whitney F119-PW-100: 35,000 lb-ft each or 70,000 × 2 (in AB) F-35A - DRY Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-100: 28,000 lb-ft F-35A - WET Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-100: 43,000 lb-ft (in AB) F-35A, P&W "GO1" (Growth Option 1), Completed testing & production-ready: May-17 - Claimed Power Increase: +8-10% across all variants flight envelopes & improved, - Claimed Efficiency Increase: +5-6 % lower burn-rate, extending flight + loiter times Calculated out, result in: F-35A - DRY Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-100 (GO1): 31,000 lb-ft F-35A - WET Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-100 (GO1): 47,000 lb-ft (in AB)

[@gbonkers666]

Just make an F-14E or F14FX wild weasel....that would've been awesome...

[@BasicBobby]

I like your analysis. Though, you made some mathematical errors when dealing with 2 engines in a few spots just FYI. Playing devil’s advocate-the F-18 is as designed this way for a reason-pretty much specifically for the Navy. It needs to be very good at low speed, maneuvering, and it needs engine redundancy. The Navy prioritizes engine redundancy, airframe size, and maintainability more than the other branches, because its access to resources is much more limited when deployed and accidents leading to a foul deck can compromise the safety of thousands at one time. Therefore, they needed two engines, and a small airframe, that prioritized maintainability and reliability above raw performance. That’s how you got two smaller engines that output about the same amount of thrust as an F-35’s single engine. I like the hornet, the F-35 was designed to be an air superiority and deep strike weapon. Using one engine instead of two, wasn’t the Navy’s preference, it was simply a compromise because of prohibitive cost. That and, the F-18 was originally designed to be a low-cost, lightweight complement to extremely expensive air superiority and fleet defense planes like the F-4, F-14 and F-15 (in the initial design competing for AF contract). Budget cuts in the 90s, led by geniuses like Cheney, left us with only these lightweight fighters. Then the F-35 took much longer than expected, the Navy cut the procurement size, and the F-22 was canceled by the Air Force (meaning the Navy had even less expected support). So we’re judging it at a bar it wasn’t designed to meet, and it’s been thrust into trying to meet by strings of bad decisions stretching across a decades. The Navy essentially panicked when China started to become an obvious near-peer threat. They didn’t have replacements for the F-14, EA-6, S-3 readily available and the F-35 was decades away from becoming available. So, they asked for the Super Hornet and Growler-bandaid options that were really never meant to be impressive or highly effective. Just good enough and readily available. So anyway, here we are. Thanks Bush, Cheney and Obama for screwing everything up.

[@johngodden4363]

Understand Australia has 11 growlers currently. The twelfth caught fire during training exercises. Also believe another five are on order.

[@JimOHalloran]

When the Australian government was looking to buy Super Hornets and Growlers to replace the F-111 and bridge the gap until F-35 deliveries started the plan was to buy 24 F-18F Super Hornets, half of which would be pre-wired for conversion to Growlers in the future. In the end though, all 24 Supers were left as Supers, and the RAAF decided to buy an additional 12 new build Growlers. One of which (311) caught fire on takeoff during a Red Flag exercises in the US and it was replaced by a new aircraft that the US Navy had in storage (313). There are no more growlers on order to the best of my knowledge.

[@alexyoutubeacct]

The cockpit layout information at 3:30 was very wrong, the display and caution light layout in either cockpit is nothing like that. Notably, only the EWO has the 8x10, which we like to call "the jumbotron".

[@smeary10]

Flown and operated by only two nations. The US and Australia.

[@Tsepher_W_T]

One thing people don’t know is that it’s predecessor the EA-6B was even better at its role

[@gbonkers666]

Probably could carry more ECM gear and anti-stuff weapons.

[@Tsepher_W_T]

@@gbonkers666 not really but it was purpose built unlike the EA-18

[@Tsepher_W_T]

@@gbonkers666 it did have a higher carry capacity though

[@y0sarian]

@@Tsepher_W_Tas someone who worked on ea-6bs…. Nah man. First off what it can do publicly and what it really can do are never the same, either model. Knowing nothing about the EW upgrades, the A-6 was a Vietnam era jet that was falling apart even after upgrading and you know it. 18’s are reliable and faster I believe at the very least. Sheer takeoff weight doesn’t correlate considering electronics tend to get smaller and lighter over time.

[@lakedude5961]

I believe the gun is missing on the ea-18

[@Interestingengineeringofficial]

You're right that the EA-18G Growler doesn't feature an integrated gun. This omission is intentional, as its primary focus is on electronic warfare capabilities rather than close-in combat or self-defense.

[@jimbob100-d3l]

@@Interestingengineeringofficial Then take it out of your description...

[@Jakesullivan2112]

@@Interestingengineeringofficialwell maybe adjust your video then where you say it has a cannon .

[@StefanBlagojevic]

Now even has an achievement "King of the Mountain Rainier" as well.

[@ryancuts]

Best jet in Australian air force, sadly we only have 12 of them

[@Sinistercabbage]

That is still more high performance electronic warfare aircraft than all countries in the world except US :)

[@GroundZeroTactical]

That's sufficient for Australia six in one direction six in the other.😅

[@shatner99]

Wish we had these and several dozen regular Superhornets along with35s. Create a new CF18 flight team with the classic plane.

[@chrismair8161]

The Energy!

[@arrowjsmith153]

The EA18G worlds best.

[@josemoreno3334]

Cool.

[@GrowlerJams]

Please remove my content from this video immediately, or I will file a copyright claim against you. You are using clips from two of my videos without permission.

[@hermanmusimbi4337]

dude, Its transformative. You'd lose the DMCA in a heart beat.

[@makvynas9]

skill issue

[@frostedbutts4340]

stay mad

[@GooxGoox]

howd the copyright claim go?

[@skylerallens]

Nah, once you post a video online it's out of your hands at that point. Should have watermarked your videos.

[@bopitbull3957]

I'm so sick of people saying China can beat the U.S.A in the air it would be over in a few hours with china trying to negotiate to save a few planes. The 150 Raptors could take care of them alone.

[@DeadPig325]

Yuh

[@DeadPig325]

This thing is truly "next level"

[@herrwolf5184]

The Growler was not effective against the Chinese Navy. kzbin.info/www/bejne/rZyTZIWAeLmKp5o

[@AnTiThesis-HaT-HoT]

Why does UK not have these?

[@AA-xo9uw]

The UK doesn't have any $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

[@dennychaput4689]

Is this a Grumman bird or Boeing?

[@Msit508]

You Doffe not help me I can understand all Suppy program😮😢

[@ryancuts]

Im happy Australia has 12 of these, seems silly other country's besides usa 🇺🇸 don't have them

[@RiMajol8081]

Watching this 02/02/2024. U.S. just launched airstrikes using EA18 Growler to jam enemy radars.

[@creolespanish34]

So, if these guys had the enemy's COs phone numbers, they could send them personalized gifts, provided they forget to turn off their devices on the battlefield

[@victorinoiilubang2539]

But China says if "defeated" the Growler.

[@GoodCitizen-gm1tl]

yes, the Growler was defeated by the Chinese PLA Navy in the latest eletronic warfare secretely occurring in the South China Sea. The US chief commander was dismissed by the Pentagon as a result of the defeat.

[@GoodCitizen-gm1tl]

China’s cutting-edge electronic warfare (EW) capabilities are transforming the balance of power in the South China Sea, as shown by a recent encounter between US and Chinese forces. This month, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported on China’s enhanced EW capabilities by shedding light on a December 2023 incident between a US EA-18 Growler carrier-based EW aircraft and China’s Type 055 cruiser Nanchang in the contested South China Sea. SCMP says that in December 2023, the US Navy dismissed William Coulter, commander of US Electronic Attack Squadron 136 (VAQ-136), stationed on the USS Carl Vinson, citing a loss of confidence in his ability to command. The report says that a month later, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) recognized the Nanchang’s crew for their actions against a US carrier fleet. It also notes that Chinese media highlighted an encounter involving an EA-18G, believed to be from Coulter’s squadron, and the Nanchang cruiser. The report mentions that PLA scientists recently disclosed in a Radar & ECM journal article that AI-enhanced radar gave the Nanchang an advantage over the EA-18G’s jamming capabilities. It claims that the EA-18G, manufactured by Boeing, has been upgraded since 2021 for future warfare but faces new challenges from the PLA-Navy’s (PLA-N) integrated radar systems and communication strategies.

[@mbmann3892]

:29 That was a hard landing .

[@sidharthcs2110]

That's how the Navy lands

[@alexyoutubeacct]

Navy ain't got time to flare. Recongize the city in the background? The casinos are waiting!

[@chak2822]

The growler and all other jets, ARE STILL BIG, I thought they were tiny, not at all they are big planes still

[@acupofsoda2443]

Shit that was a hard landing

[@skylerallens]

By design and all intentions.

[@TheRpg1964]

Did anybody know that Australia also operates the EA-18G? Probably not!

[@AA-xo9uw]

Plenty of us know that the RAAF has 12 EA-18Gs.

[@novemberzed9163]

EW might have worked against smaller, less developed countries that divided states has terrorized, but it wont work against Russia and China who have their own electronic warfare and jamming means. That's why divided states cant send em to elenski, cause they would be wrecked over there, and they wouldnt be able to pick up the pieces of them.

[@smeary10]

Not sure about that. That's not why they're not sent into the Ukraine. The US or Australia (the only two countries that have Growlers) can't be seen sending such technology into that theater of war. Especially as only US and Aussie aircrew can ever operate them due to the years of training required.

[@novemberzed9163]

@@smeary10 They wont send em because they would get wrecked. Regardless of who pilots them. Survivability would be very low.

[@CherryColaWizard]

Any nation that has electronic equipment is vulnerable to EW, included China and Russia. What makes you think they can't also be jammed?

[@smeary10]

you never send Growlers in alone so that's a moot point. @@novemberzed9163

[@verdebusterAP]

How about no Russia's EW is geting picked apart in Ukraine, more the point, Russia's lack of EW is why they are getting their asses handed to them One of the tricks that US developed with EA-6B and EA-18G is the ability to track radio sources in real time By positioning aircraft at key points, they can locate targets by emission and track them in real time if Russia had that capability, HIMARS would have been destroy with in a matter of weeks Yet its been nearly 2 years and not one lost More the point, If Russia had that capability, they would easily picked apart the equipment sent by the west yet we are two years into it and nada

[@NCmtnDweller]

Americana !!

[@johnblaesel5493]

Never heard of the EA-18G Growler.

[@IndiaMikePapa]

You heard it here first!

[@johnblaesel5493]

​@IndiaMikePapa I guess so and I certainly wouldn't want that thing growling at me!

[@annazavarzina6145]

When you hear something you never heard before flying over your head, it could be another time. 🙂 I thought the end of the world happened. I grew right into the pavement. 😁

[@MrMattstearns]

I am glad i am out, and don't want to know nothing. This way me and my family can sleep good and let the cards fall were they may.

[@DeadPig325]

Amen

[@GoodCitizen-gm1tl]

the Growler was defeated by the Chinese PLA Navy in the latest eletronic warfare secretely occurring in the South China Sea. The US chief commander was dismissed by the Pentagon as a result of the defeat.

[@RyanSummer-o2d]

They got their bottom handed to them by J16Ds recently.

[@Angry.General1461]

It's just an F-18 carrying a heavier load. They should have kept the F-14 in service!

[@moonasha]

this has literally nothing to do with an F-14 it fulfills an entirely different role, an extremely important one I might add.

[@gbonkers666]

Yep.....call it the F14E or better yet the F14 FX (as in special effects) or the Buzzcat!!

[@RikkiSan1]

The f-14 is retired...let it go... it's over it's never coming back

[@atlet1]

False! Others have commented at some false claims. Growler is not unique. Russia have similar capabilities. Gripen E have all capabilities of Growler plus M2, supercruise, long range, high agility, high availability, low visibility, GaN tech, spherical action EW, multifunctional stealthy broadband radio link to other airplanes and two other radio links for the rest of the military force. It's a omni role fighter that can do ever mission very good, even in the same flight. Everything is built in, except long wavelength EW pod and RECCE pod.

[@spiff1003]

0:28... Naval aviators can't land (flare) if they tried to! :D

[@jimclarke1108]

Top secret😁

[@gbonkers666]

Wouldn't cutting off an enemy hearing and sight be the first indication that the enemy's coming? "Jammed? but how could they be jamming us if they don't know we're... if we're coming!?"--Lando Calrissen, The Return of the Jedi. "It's a trap! All fighters pull up!!"

[@Msit508]

2013

[@well-blazeredman6187]

I wonder how the capabilities of the Growler compare with what the Israeli Air Force can do.

[@smeary10]

Never underestimate the Israelis.

[@brett327]

Israel doesn’t have a tactical airborne Electronic Attack platform.

[@IndiaMikePapa]

@@brett327they do, the F-35…

[@brett327]

F-35 is not a tactical Jx platform like Growler, though it does have some very limited Jx capabilities. Growler and F-35 work together as a team to achieve the desired effect.@@IndiaMikePapa

[@amourosman3959]

@@smeary10Israël is nothing without usa

[@Msit508]

2x more then

[@Msit508]

Electronic (2013)

[@HappyTime-nb6of]

only united states and australia have these. . :)

[@AnonymousAlcoholic772]

Wait, the plane has a range of 975 miles and a max speed of 1600 miles per hour? So at cruising speed it can loiter for an hour? Wtf? Has to be a mistake

[@kacpertokarz8268]

Sounds about right, on full afterburner at max speed a fighter jet will burn through all it's fuel in like 10 minutes. Cruising they typically only get a couple hours without adding external fuel tanks.

[@AnonymousAlcoholic772]

@@kacpertokarz8268 thats with external tanks

[@kacpertokarz8268]

​@@AnonymousAlcoholic772oh if that's with external tanks then that seems incorrect, I would imagine it would be over double that.

[@AnonymousAlcoholic772]

@@kacpertokarz8268 ya cant be right.

[@SuperEdge67]

Its max speed is Mach 1.6 not 1600 mph. Mach 1 is the speed of sound. The speed of sound is much much slower than 1000 miles per hour.

[@brett327]

So much bad info in this video. Growler doesn’t have a gun, nor can it carry any AIM-9 variant.

[@DeadPig325]

This thing grot crashed by those women aaaaah!!!

[@touchofgrey5372]

It's hard to believe that in this day and age there is still someone who does not know the correct pronunciation of MACH! It's Mock 1.. as in Mockingbird!

[@dennychaput4689]

You might have heard an AI mispronunciation , typical these days , same with AI misspellings on CC.

[@SuperiorAmericanGuy]

Give Ukraine some of those types of jets to counter those sukhoi terror jets of evil soviet Russia.

[@mikedavis199]

Ukraine does not need, nor do they deserve these. Most of the jamming capabilities of these are still classified. Why would we give them to an army that barely even has an airforce? They'd get shot down because they don't know how to fly them

[@SuperiorAmericanGuy]

Would you recommend giving Ukraine other weapons then?

[@mikedavis199]

@@SuperiorAmericanGuy Nope. It's not our war to fight. I'm tired of seeing handouts to that country when the gear we CURRENTLY field is all half broken. 7 Years in the Marine Corps and I can count on one hand the number of "New" items I got issued at CIF. Why are we giving them our best when we aren't even getting it?

[@SuperiorAmericanGuy]

Ukraine didn’t attack first Russia did. Those Soviets want to rebuild the Soviet Union by exterminating Ukraine and america plus those commies made illegal terror weapons: T-14, Kirov, that Russian carrier of theirs, typhoons, Akulas and Su-57 terror jets.

[@gabriel-kn1bl]

​@@mikedavis199So the US soldiers won't have the need to fight the Russians is Ukraine can destroy most of them.

[@AndrewLambert-wi8et]

Russia is king of electronic warfare. Proven on several occasions. Next is France. I could be wrong in both cases.

[@aliciadurant2883]

T’abuse un peu… on a aucun équivalent en france

[@AchwaqKhalid]

Genuinely curious to know why you mentioned France 🤔 Never heard of any EW system coming from there

[@GroundZeroTactical]

🤣

[@mejestic124]

They don't even have high end electronic manufacturing capability so how would they be in the top game?

[@g-money1723]

You are wrong. Lol

[@motorcyclematthew5741]

Fake news 😂

[@interesting5638]

The growler is no joke it’s proven to be more powerful than the German/Italian Tornado ECR

[@GoodCitizen-gm1tl]

@@interesting5638 It was defeated by China in the South China Sea in December 2023 during a secretive electromagnetic warfare.

[@JimmyMichael-w7r]

Chinese J16 EW Suits is more advanced than US F18

[@eseetoh]

Really no gun? Then it's truly wasted to use this platform for EW when it has no close-in self defense ability. Better to use a non combatant platform instead.

[@Interestingengineeringofficial]

The EA-18G Growler is specifically designed for electronic warfare, focusing on disrupting enemy radar and communications systems rather than close-in self-defense. Its role as an electronic warfare platform maximizes its effectiveness in that domain.

[@LoudestHoward]

It has AMRAAMs to defend itself, the gun is gone because it's got more electronics in the nose.

[@eseetoh]

@@LoudestHoward now that makes sense.

[@philduoos2961]

@@Interestingengineeringofficial I was just reading about the earlier version - the Prowler. No Prowler had ever been shot down in its 30+ years of service (with no guns).

[@jimbob100-d3l]

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

[@edwardcook2973]

Still not as good as the Prowler.