If world's population didn't reproduce like rabbits it could have been.
@liamriley98163 жыл бұрын
Take solace in knowing that in a parallel universe, these aircraft won out and today they are so big they have casinos and saunas on them.
@joemama-fz2gl3 жыл бұрын
@@liamriley9816 but instead were stuck with stupid planes with small leg room and a claustrophobic feel
@cynicalyinsane50763 жыл бұрын
Really does just shows you that the wars and the limits of pols imaginations are what has lost alot of these amazing machines to the past I think the biggest issue like you see with alot of these designs is the technology didn't fit the vision at the time and just wasn't up to par for what the person had in mind, ppl had wild and amazing ideas but never had the imagination to believe that just maybe one day with time and patience we might crack it and finally figure out the flaws
@geetarguy7773 жыл бұрын
I don’t see why the military doesn’t have a fighter flying boat that can just land and take off from water...
@nicholasaudy60644 жыл бұрын
Bring tears to my eyes that this kind of concept failed. Looks like something straight out of an alternate universe
@scootergeorge95764 жыл бұрын
You probably think the Bristol Brabazon was a great idea too. kzbin.info/www/bejne/d2fTpHh3hMZ9m7M
@tommycouser6564 жыл бұрын
i was just thinking the same thing. This looks like a steampunk design.
@mrvespuccia.k.ameganite17474 жыл бұрын
The plane would fit in the fallout universe if the plane just looked a bit more 1950s (which it already looks) I can just imagine a commercial for this by Poseidon energy on a wall somewhere and the enclave was able to hold on to one after the war.
@scootergeorge95764 жыл бұрын
@@mrvespuccia.k.ameganite1747 - Could you please translate that into English?
@blackleprechaun79664 жыл бұрын
If not for WW2 this very well might have been the reality today.
@jackturner99854 жыл бұрын
I swear to God this channel is going places. The animation skills and the effort it takes for research etc must be astounding ! We salute you, Sir Mustard!
@depausvandelilithkerk57854 жыл бұрын
Yes, I agree. Mustard really have put some extra mustard on that mustard in this Mustard video.
@williamfulgham20104 жыл бұрын
@@depausvandelilithkerk5785 all that mustard talk has made me hungry. I think I will go eat now.
@danroberts90504 жыл бұрын
20 years from now this channel is replaced by ..... the flying boat! LOL
@saratov994 жыл бұрын
So where is MiG-25 episode?
@marygrech76444 жыл бұрын
You have e no writ to aware to God o r by God
@6rimR3ap3r3 жыл бұрын
Flying boats really feel like a successor to blimp traveling. Luxurious, slower paced traveling with extravagant solutions. It's a shame this idea didn't even survive for the rich.
@Rob.N7713 жыл бұрын
Well said sir.
@Noobie2k73 жыл бұрын
Yeah, i feel Flying Boats might have survived if those trying to keep them around didn't keep putting them in direct competition with Land plane air-liners, which they just lose out too on almost all the points they were trying to fight on. If they'd just kept pushing Sea-planes as more an alternative to cruise ships and luxury travel it might well have worked. Like Push Sea-Planes not as a simple mode of transport but as a part of the experience. Like they did with Airships at first.
@setro55823 жыл бұрын
Final Fantasy stares from a distance.
@sevenravens3 жыл бұрын
Would love to travel in a zeppelin across the Atlantic or anywhere! Would be awesome to just fly across America low and slow and just watch the world go by.
@Rebotified3 жыл бұрын
If only we had a elon like guy to invest.
@jaymaster1034 жыл бұрын
Man this channel is therapeutic, you have vast amounts of knowledge and everything just flows. You keep me glued to my screen the entire video. Animations on point. Keep up the good work.
@jch81754 жыл бұрын
Jay I am legally unable to like due to you a having 69. I would unfortunately be hurting you by doing so
@AlonsoUQ4 жыл бұрын
I agree
@nathanielw82344 жыл бұрын
"...designed for a future that never existed" *damn that part hit hard*
@jdg99994 жыл бұрын
Every time I see stuff about the post-WW2 British aircraft industry it makes me imagine an alternate universe where Britain remains a superpower and can keep developing awesome stuff instead of losing all its industries.
@nathanielw82344 жыл бұрын
@@jdg9999 Indeed, it's quite a shame that Britain had to suffer so much throughout WW2. Good thing America swooped in and had their back.
@L0stJ0hnny4 жыл бұрын
@@jdg9999 - 17.4 million Brits believe that they're actually living in that alternate universe…
@nathanielw82344 жыл бұрын
@@L0stJ0hnny I don't blame them. They suffered so much morale loss, something had to boost their ego. Just ask Winston Churchill.
@basswarnow4 жыл бұрын
me_irl
@tristar10124 жыл бұрын
Today is a good day. Eat your heart out Valentine's Day I'm here for Mustard's amazing aviation videos!
@miniena77744 жыл бұрын
TriStar 101 Don’t tell me what to do.
@sirrliv4 жыл бұрын
I choose to think it is appropriate, celebrating a romantic dream of travel from the past.
@jimdavis83914 жыл бұрын
Only Valentines interest me are the tanks.
@CRohitSorte4 жыл бұрын
Only Aviation
@evonrn20004 жыл бұрын
@@miniena7774 Be Told what to do...it's already Done!You were Told😂
@porthos61183 жыл бұрын
I can still remember the sound of the "Cattalina" flying boats taking off from their base in Rose Bay in Sydney Harbour. There was about 2 miles of runway markers set out on the water. But just that glorious sound of big prop engines revving, building speed and then slowly trailing off into the distance. Sorry starting to tear up of days gone by. Thanks for the vid.
@hebn.3 жыл бұрын
The Catalina has always been a plane that I'd adored since I first saw it as a kid. I once got to see a shell of one that was being restored, but never a complete one, let alone get to see one flying. I bet that was quite a sight to behold. I did however get to sit in a Bristol Beaufighter in Melbourne, that was quite surreal.
@stanpolchinski89562 жыл бұрын
cancel all feeds?
@tomgreene79422 жыл бұрын
Ah, my family went to Catalina Island, California, back in the early 70s, and my two oldest brothers got to fly home on a Catalina flying boat. I was so jealous and couldn't wait until I'd be old enough to do it too. Too late, the line was closed down. At least I got to see it take off and land. A beauty to behold.
@robbie903010 ай бұрын
A great plane was the Catalina. I’ve never seen one flying.
@CommaV94144 жыл бұрын
'Travel over 9000 kilometers' You awakened a long forgotten part of my brain with that line
@davidvasquez084 жыл бұрын
Wauser *Angry Vegeta noises*
@katherineberger63297 ай бұрын
WHAT, NINE THOUSAND???
@akam99194 жыл бұрын
Love hate this channel: They show something cool, then tell you why it didn't work.
@megaclodsire4 жыл бұрын
In an ideal world, we would make giant aircraft just for the hell of it
@meghanachauhan93804 жыл бұрын
They show you cool, then throw shit on it :(
@meghanachauhan93804 жыл бұрын
@@megaclodsire probably one with low population. But that world wouldn't be much rich cuz capitalism needs a lot of people to spend a lot of money to work. So the government would need to undertake it. But it wouldn't cuz democracy and political drama
@erickg35084 жыл бұрын
and you need ro see what happened to the comet the one that tanked this type of aircrafts... crazy!
@davemccombs4 жыл бұрын
Or over-the-top sponsor asskissing, something cool, sponsor asskissing, sponsor asskissing. My god, this channel has more spots than a dalmation.
@JP-19904 жыл бұрын
"Made for a future that never existed" I think I know this feeling.
@assassinaria4 жыл бұрын
Except this time, we are in the alternate universe.
@ElwoodBlues8304 жыл бұрын
That's the same idea for the self-driving car. Maybe...
@hyri31884 жыл бұрын
Elwood Blues I hope so. Self driving should only be an assist, not a full function you know?
@howardwayne39744 жыл бұрын
In my dreams I live in the 1920's piloting a china clipper to midway island.
@Applekuchenthetasty4 жыл бұрын
We got the boring time line
@shevetlevi28214 жыл бұрын
I've always loved those flying boats of the 1930's like the Boeing 314 in "Raiders of the Lost Ark". They were kind of the aviation equivalent of the Orient Express. Any plane that has multiple levels, bars, restaurants and sleeping cabins is very cool.
@barfuss20073 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/rGPEkoucpt15qLM
@markprange43862 жыл бұрын
I remember the Martin 404's sound when it flew over Oxford, Mississippi in the early 1970s.
@shevetlevi2821 Жыл бұрын
@@shastamccoy7777 I know exactly what you're talking about. You see that route animation in old movies. It goes perfectly with these beautiful old planes.
@shevetlevi2821 Жыл бұрын
@@shastamccoy7777 :-) Have a good weekend.
@mattperson729310 ай бұрын
There was no Boeing 314 in Raiders. That was a Shorts Solent Mk.III
@erode.51014 жыл бұрын
Saunders-Roe: Foldable wingtips Boeing: *Aight, let's do that*
@lp11thewolf794 жыл бұрын
The 777x
@martijn95684 жыл бұрын
Cough, any postwar US Navy carrier plane
@FearlessLeader20014 жыл бұрын
Didn't Blohm & Voss and Consolidated do that as well, earlier in the 20th century?
@rozeone69734 жыл бұрын
lol
@erode.51014 жыл бұрын
But I don't think they made passenger models, they all made military models
@sentinelcheese34204 жыл бұрын
9:50 That's a shame for someone so amazingly talented get demonetized for just talking about history. I wonder if covering topics regarding automotive would suit your channel. There's a lot in terms of development and strange creations that took place you could cover about like the Brabham BT46-B, The Tucker car, Chrysler Turbine car or the amazing creations of Lotus boss Colin Chapman. Or even just record breakers like the Spirit of Australia or Donald Campbell. Love to see such videos on your channel in the future! :)
@mj64634 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I never saw that mig 25 video :(
@augustovasconcellos71734 жыл бұрын
@@mj6463 wait, did he actually make that MIG-25 video? I've been following his channel for a long time now and I don't remember him ever posting it.
@nybotor4 жыл бұрын
Some automotive videos would be good, like the history of the McLaren F1, the first gen Ford Taurus, GM EV1, and maybe even a video on British Leyland!
@Hyntin4 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately we're all just a tad bit too stupid to decide on our own what to consume and might make a "wrong" decision. How scary would that be? I don't even want to think of it! It's OK though. They know what we should see and learn and will do their best to make sure we choose correctly. Thank you big brother for watching over me. :)
@williammagoffin93244 жыл бұрын
KZbin currently believes that anything related to "human conflict" is unsuitable for monetization and thus will be blacklisted by the algorithm. To paraphrase Karl from IntrangeTV: "human conflict" describes all of human history. History is just one subject on KZbin's shit list, they are targeting channels dedicated to scientific inquiry and human rights as well. Bloke on the Range just has a recent video featuring a discussion between him and Karl about running their respective channels and how the current owners of KZbin are stifling discussion of things they in some cases should be encouraging. As Indy Neidell has suggested all KZbin really wants is videos on cats on vacuum cleaners.
@mokopaneledwaba21894 жыл бұрын
Made for a future that never existed Concorde: want a hug?
@talalzahid22413 жыл бұрын
Idiot, concorde served for almost 3 decades !!
@karlsonchee27013 жыл бұрын
@@talalzahid2241 on a small scale. compare to thier original goal to revolutionized air travel, I would say the concorde is a failure
@CatalinaThePirate3 жыл бұрын
😕 I want a hug. I love flying boats. 😳
@terminator30003 жыл бұрын
@@talalzahid2241 the concorde was a heavily subsidized prestige object. Not really a revolution in airtravel.
@venusreena25323 жыл бұрын
@@karlsonchee2701 ... glass half empty?
@ShelbyAQD3 жыл бұрын
Flying boats are an oddly nostalgic thing for me. It probably stems from seeing fantastical versions of them in so many shows and games in my childhood. I can't help thinking that right now would be a great time to begin developing a new generation of these aircraft. They might never be as efficient or cheap as a standard plane, but they offer such whimsy that it definitely seems worth it to me.
@m2heavyindustries3782 жыл бұрын
Certainly, if you have the investment money to start work on one
@pgmreallaw2 жыл бұрын
I would imagine modern technology could make them more efficient and if we had more planes able to land on water, it would alleviate crowded land-based airports which pose a significant environmental cost (rainwater runoff, loss of vegetation, over-development, etc.). Landing on water would free up some infrastructure investments as really only a port would have to be built rather than a large field covered over in concrete.
@LiterallyMark14 жыл бұрын
Instead we sit in rows like people in sweat shops. Edit: I take it back lol dunno why I said that and why so many people agree, this is the only reason why flights are affordable
@hoppinonabronzeleg94774 жыл бұрын
And sit next to morbidly fat people who's flab constantly squeezes around the armrests!
@LionsGateCorp4 жыл бұрын
Indeed. Greed always wins its way, sadly.
@m2heavyindustries3784 жыл бұрын
If less people flew, then this wouldn't be a problem- mass flying is the issue, not plane tech. Peasants
@probablynotabigtoe94074 жыл бұрын
You can always pay for 1st class... There Is a reason more legroom costs more money.
@jamesgarrison64304 жыл бұрын
Sweat shops have more room between rows
@alexnagessar43024 жыл бұрын
When Mustard uploads, my heart nearly stops. I LOVE YOUR VIDS
@affandi994 жыл бұрын
Saunders-Roe Princess Now that is something new to learn and makes me more curious. Thank you Mustard !
@timpassmore74552 жыл бұрын
It's a mystery how Saunders Roe lasted as long as it did. Their largest production run was only 31 airplanes, and those delivered to the RAF were only in service a few years. Worst was the Lerwick that was dangerously unstable. Another failure was a jet powered fighter that the RAF "...concluded that the design was incapable of matching up to the performance of land-based designs". Kittiwake 1 A.3 Valkyrie 1 A.4 Medina 1 A.14 1 A.7 Severn 1 A17 Cutty Sark 12 Short service life A.19 Cloud 22 " " A.21 Windhover 2 A.27 London 31 Introduced 1936 Retired 1941 A.19 Cloud 22 Last one delivered 1935 Withdrawn 1939 A.33 1 A.36 Lerwick 21 Very unstable 11 lost in accidents A.37 Shrimp 1 Developmental only SR.A/1 3 Jet flying boat fighter SR.45 Princess 1 as described in this video After this, no further seaplanes left the drawing board. They did have one land based plane of which 17 were built, but it was designed by someone else.
@doankhang94962 жыл бұрын
they built hulls for other flying boats in their earlier years
@Irfan872 жыл бұрын
Private backing?
@tspcrowther Жыл бұрын
They were also developing helicopters and hovercraft that likely helped them stay afloat.
@misterribal4 жыл бұрын
Imagine an airline has one flying boat jet-powered airliner today, they could offer really remote locations for cheaper and even organise a cruise ship like trip. They would own an untapped part of the market. This has potential
@jielynsabarez26934 жыл бұрын
It could also open up ocean airports, the airports could be used as a refueling station. The only thing Im concerned about is the pollution it would make in it's wake.
@drdewott91544 жыл бұрын
If such a market was catered for then so many islands like St Helena wouldn't have to invest the sums into constructing airports
@Airwerxco4 жыл бұрын
A vehicle that can offer charter air travel to remote locations without an airport for a small number of interested passengers.. Yes if only a craft like this existed. *cough* Helicopters *cough*
@KamikazeCommie5014 жыл бұрын
nope
@Skullair3134 жыл бұрын
This would be wildly inefficient. Like the jet-train and zeppelins it is just not competitive to modern jets
@stixheaven67894 жыл бұрын
Had a small heart attack when I saw the mig 25 video PLEASE MAKE ONE its probably my favourite plane. A video on it would be amazing!
@robd61224 жыл бұрын
Sigh... If only KZbin (and advertisers) can understand that knife is only a weapon when you want it to be a weapon and the same applies with anything basically
@kutter_ttl67864 жыл бұрын
If he does make one it'll probably be a Nebula exclusive. The way KZbin algorithms works it wouldn't be worth his time to put it here.
@stixheaven67894 жыл бұрын
@@kutter_ttl6786 yeah, it's unfortunate but I guess that's the way it is
@bobthetree59354 жыл бұрын
The flying boats remind me of airships from studio Ghibli movies.
@IvanQuaglia4 жыл бұрын
me too
@superroydude4 жыл бұрын
Miyazaki is known to be a plane enthusiast so im sure that was intentional.
@Tigershark_30824 жыл бұрын
@@superroydude Not only that, his father worked in the aviation industry during and after WWII. Planes are such interesting things, as they fulfill humanity's desires of flight. I can tell you from experience that flying is so freeing. Anyway, take care and have a great day!
@kwaivioussankensa36644 жыл бұрын
They remind me of those planes from nausicaa of the valley of the wind that the army used
@lucianmoore60124 жыл бұрын
Porco Rosso is a fabulous film
@Gribbo99994 жыл бұрын
I remember sometime in the early '60s I took a trip to the Isle of White with my parents and the Princesses were still sitting on the Saunders-Roe slipway . It was before the 747 had ever flown and it's size was an impressive site for a young feller. I think we may have been on a pleasure boat trip because I even remember the guide on the boat saying something about "white elephants' as we passed the yard - which I thought was funny having never heard the idiom before.
@davidhowe69052 жыл бұрын
Yes, I remember seeing one too, about the same time, must have been on a school trip from London. To be frank, even by then it was a sorry sight (but obviously still memorable!)
@paulmcmahon11292 жыл бұрын
I saw those abandoned hulls/fuselages lying in the mud about the same time. Amazing, but really sad for a plane-mad kid. Nobody believed me when I talked about them: finally, proof that I wasn't dreaming! Thanks for that.
@davidjones3322 жыл бұрын
I remember seeing them too, at that same time but I'm sure we walked past the yard and viewed them from the nose. I remember they were cocooned in some sort of silvery plastic material which was coming loose and flapping around one of the hatches. They were the first large aircraft I had ever seen close up, and hugely impressive.
@laszlokaestner57664 жыл бұрын
Saunders-Roe were an amazing company that, towards the end, had little luck with actually selling stuff. Not only did they produce the last and arguably greatest flying boats but they built the first hovercraft (as shown). They also built Black Knight/Black arrow which was Great Britain's entry into the space race. The Prospero satellite launched by Black Arrow is still in orbit and still apparently broadcasting its radio ping. The Princess car and passenger hovercraft that crossed the English Channel were built in the same hanger as the Princess Flying Boat! Most recently the successors to SARO in East Cowes now part of the GKN group make winglets and have about a third of the world market. Most Boeing and Airbus types have been made there. Also some of the major design for the A380 was undertaken at the East Cowes site so they still do big! The hanger that made both types of Princess now makes aluminium high speed water craft. This venture - Wight Shipyard - is quickly making a name as one of the best in the world in this field. Recent boats include the newest Thames Clipper, and two ferry/party boats for Cancun in Mexico. Currently they are building four craft for Malta.
@Automatic-Diaphragm4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info, that's exactly what I expected from the video when they started with the M&A diagram but moved on prematurely :D
@johnburns40174 жыл бұрын
Britain's entry into space exploration was well before Black Knight. kzbin.info/www/bejne/rYipd62Ca5qXe7M
@cedriclynch4 жыл бұрын
The day after the satellite Prospero was launched in October 1971, the UK government cancelled its space programme.
@sirmartinfrobisher4 жыл бұрын
I have big memories of the Princess. In my final years at school just outside Southampton. I discovered that the council was opening an Adventure Centre on the old seaplane base at Calshot. I asked the school if they could organise for us to attend there each week for sailing lessons (the dream of my life). The answer came back, yes and yes. So each week about 20 of us travelled to Calshot. There were two Princesses, mothballed on the slipway, looking very forelorn. She had to get the dinghy masts under their wings. There was no chance of flying but they still sit in the worn glow. I am 71 and still sail, so it was a good public investment.
@wilmaknickersfit4 жыл бұрын
What a fantastic memory you shared. Thank you!
@LionsGateCorp4 жыл бұрын
A life well lived, a tip of the hat to you, sir.
@willpaul52024 жыл бұрын
I'm jealous
@whitehorse19594 жыл бұрын
Pack it in, you old fart ;-)
@hevendor9584 жыл бұрын
a Flying Boat Hotel *oh HELL YEAH THIS FLYING BOAT IS MY TYPE*
@handlemonium4 жыл бұрын
Yeah kinda like an A380 and Concord Luxery combined, but slower xD
@solunasunrise4 жыл бұрын
flyin boat casino and opium den
@raijinmeister2 жыл бұрын
It's incredible how back in the 50-60-70s so many designs were concerned with ppassengers' comfort, a clear contrast with what we have nowadays.
@Ushio012 жыл бұрын
They also cost a fortune to fly on them. The Boeing 707 and DC-8 all had standard seats with 34 inches of pitch. Today economy is 28-30 inches while business class is 36 inches. For seat width todays first class is just 22 inches while economy is 17 inches while back in the 60's economy had 21 inches! The sacrifice for flying to be affordable for middle and lower income is todays economy class. Back then even the cheap seats were business class pricing. 1952 was also an interesting year since not only was it this flying boat and the Comet both having their first flights but the SS United States became the fastest ocean liner to cross the Atlantic. It really showed the change from the industrial age to the modern age.
@MarikHavair Жыл бұрын
Well, they were mostly accommodating the rich, the same change happened with passenger trains.
@csours4 жыл бұрын
9:21 Strangely Futuristic and Archaic at the same time; That's how the 1950's Britain do.
@TheInselaffen4 жыл бұрын
Great inspiration for Thunderbirds though.
@zakofrx4 жыл бұрын
I am very pissed that I missed the Giant Flying Boats. Flying around the world on a Pan Am Clipper would have been and experience. The world just moved slower for those with means back then and you got to enjoy the trip.
@TheInselaffen4 жыл бұрын
@@zakofrx very few had 'means.' Nostalgia is rubbish. I am quite happy with now.
@shebbs14 жыл бұрын
@@TheInselaffen True, and likely future generations will feel the same as you about our time, will be interesting to see how 2020 is regarded.
@livethefuture24924 жыл бұрын
Owain Shebbeare As of 2020 we are nostalgic about the times when we even could fly...
@stormtrooper66024 жыл бұрын
9:41 mig-25....i really love that fighter...
@LogieT2K4 жыл бұрын
Storm trooper awesome bit of soviet engineering
@Axemantitan4 жыл бұрын
Are we going to get to see the MiG-25 video?
@super-cacti4 жыл бұрын
I....I am speachless. You actualy made a video of one of my favorite aircraft! Thank you so much!
Boeing 747: im the first double deck plane Saunders-Roe Princess: am i a joke to you?
@fierfighter4 жыл бұрын
@Paul Ricchiuti oooooh thats true
@definitely_notme41124 жыл бұрын
Airbus A380: im the first fully double deck plane Saunders-Roe Princess: am i joke to everyone?
@igameidoresearchtoo65113 жыл бұрын
@@definitely_notme4112 apparently a joke to my dad XD
@maskedavenger25783 жыл бұрын
Boeing made an earlier piston engine powered double deck airliner with sleeping berths .that both BOAC & Pan American Airlines used before the Comet & Boeing 707 on routes across the Atlantic in the 1950’s .I think it was called a Globemaster or similar name had four engines & 2 decks & was a conventional hard runway aircraft it might have even been designed during WW2 ready for peacetime .Large flying boats were well past their sell date buy the time that SRP monstrosity hit the sky .Howard Hughes spruce goose dwarfed the SRP flying boat anyway .
@CaseyJonesNumber13 жыл бұрын
@@maskedavenger2578 you're thinking of the Boeing 377 Stratocruiser. Its lower deck was very small and cramped, and on most airlines it was used as a bar, with seating room for only about six. The Douglas Globemaster was indeed a double-decker, but was used only for freight, and never went into passenger service.
@LemonToGo4 жыл бұрын
The gods of aviation have blessed us on this holy Friday!
@davidosaje41004 жыл бұрын
Yes
@kalpakwadettiwar94874 жыл бұрын
Amen
@thejay89634 жыл бұрын
E
@gabrieltassi40304 жыл бұрын
I stopped my shower to watch this
@GIPvideos4 жыл бұрын
I was about to shower before I saw this
@IxoraNera4 жыл бұрын
@leo Ng with your phone??? something feels fishy
@asherdie4 жыл бұрын
I shower while watching.
@althejazzman4 жыл бұрын
I don't shower each time Mustard releases a video. Priorities, right?
@sailintothesun34214 жыл бұрын
I need a shower after watching this
@charliebrown36074 жыл бұрын
1:37, not the only time a plane has landed in the Hudson.
@alifsyafiq46114 жыл бұрын
That come also to my mind actually...
@VibeXplorer2 жыл бұрын
It simply doesn't get better than the technique and approach Mustard uses. The visual style is perfect and period-specific. He could have detailed the aircraft's design by depicting it sitting in the water or floating in a black void but instead, he turns it into a model on a desktop in an office or den complete with bookshelves in the background. Genius!
@Kanbei11 Жыл бұрын
Just a pity they didn't put that much effort into pronouncing Farnborough properly
@phoenixnoire24354 жыл бұрын
"Designed for a future that never existed." You can say that about a lot of things, but wouldn't it be cool to see the futures where they did?
@ashakydd14 жыл бұрын
Flying boats definitely were a more romantic concept than practical, in the long run. I would have loved to have seen that massive, final flying boat get built.
@gazaalley38624 жыл бұрын
@TukiRaja on twitch yessss
@EmeraldForester7774 жыл бұрын
Yes, a future where they have giant, nuclear-powered boat planes.
@spinyslasher65864 жыл бұрын
If you want a future with even more pollution, then go ahead.
@phoenixnoire24354 жыл бұрын
@TukiRaja on twitch or SNES-era RPG's?
@sirmeatloaf4 жыл бұрын
Imagine you're chilling on your roof, it's evening. You look up in the sky and see this
@raidy52154 жыл бұрын
*loud propeller noises*
@twandepan4 жыл бұрын
RaidyTJC it would be quieter than jets of the time I believe
@justin.g254 жыл бұрын
@@twandepan no its way louder.
@madzak98474 жыл бұрын
It woul sound like continious thunder BROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Even when some turboprop IL or TU flying over my house its quite disturbing , windows vibrating and sound is loud even with windows closed
@shadowwsk35074 жыл бұрын
*"BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR"*
@FalconFastest1234 жыл бұрын
If only Jack had met Rose on a flying boat, then everyone would still want them
@gregorymoore28773 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure Jack would have been blow off the nose of the aircraft while in flight. That headwind has got to be pretty strong. "I'm king of the worrrrrllll...."
@nabbitgohome96723 жыл бұрын
And instead of an ice berg causing the down fall now a whirlwind/tornado or hurricane and or a ice or sandstorm.
@HowToChangeName3 жыл бұрын
Doesnt matter as both will destroyed by climate change
@one-wingedangel51073 жыл бұрын
@@HowToChangeName Are you one of those people claiming trees are dying just because leaves are changing colors and falling off during autumn?
@HowToChangeName3 жыл бұрын
@@one-wingedangel5107 not sure, but im definitely not that guy who cant take joke like you
@cowsine4 жыл бұрын
1:40 "A flying boat landed on Hudson river!" US Airways: **Noice idea!**
@kiwitrainguy3 жыл бұрын
It only had twelve engines.
@igameidoresearchtoo65113 жыл бұрын
@@kiwitrainguy oh dont mind me just flying casually with 16 engines guess da plane
@Iugeer3 жыл бұрын
@@igameidoresearchtoo6511 antanov mk-12.56
@Shootyshoot-ls3xj3 жыл бұрын
@@igameidoresearchtoo6511 oh dont mind me just flying with 1 engine Guess the plane
@igameidoresearchtoo65113 жыл бұрын
@@Shootyshoot-ls3xj too many aircraft with 1 engine
@garlicapple22444 жыл бұрын
"Princess" isn't the largest flying boat that has ever flown, maybe the largest airliner, but not the largest. The actual largest flying boat was called the "Spruce Goose", or the Hughes H-4 Hercules which is displayed in my town in the Evergreen Museum. Funfact: It has a bunch of beach balls in it that you get to see if you go inside.
@leea87064 жыл бұрын
I was trying to remember the name of that! I remember it being mentioned in an episode of Phineas and Ferb where they built their own.
@garlicapple22444 жыл бұрын
@@leea8706 Oh my gosh you just brought back a distant memory in me :)! I remember! Ferb and the girls did like a classy musical number in that episode too!
@leea87064 жыл бұрын
Garlic Apple that’s exactly right! They also made theirs out of paper (a nod to the Spruce Goose being made out of wood) so that it would disintegrate when it landed on water and the seats were flotation devices. Phineas was also acting like Howard Hughes or someone from that time too. I’m a massive Phineas and Ferb fan, and despite being 32 my mum still buys me Phineas and Ferb stuff for Christmas, like socks or calendars.
@leea87064 жыл бұрын
Garlic Apple I’ve just remembered it was called the paper pelican!
@MyHeadHz4 жыл бұрын
I've been to that museum many times, the spruce goose always amazes!
@lordzadd4 жыл бұрын
Yeeeessssss! You're back!
@rileywags4 жыл бұрын
THE ONLY CHANNEL I HAVE NOTIFICATIONS ON AND IM SUBSCRIBED TO 571 CHANNELS
@midgetman42064 жыл бұрын
Same here, everything about these videos is high quality
@spielhund18334 жыл бұрын
Me too
@jeffstanley45934 жыл бұрын
Patreon would work better.
@TheInselaffen4 жыл бұрын
How do you ever plan to get to the end of the you tubes?
@ahpoiseheh4 жыл бұрын
Just like me ;-) Thought I was the only one!!
@markbigbadbear3 жыл бұрын
Man, I only stumbled across your website this afternoon. I'm amazed at the quality of your animations. Like in this video. The colour palette makes in the CGI parts make it feel like you're watching a travel flyer come to life. Beautiful :)
@felixcat93184 жыл бұрын
This was an accurate, well presented and narrated synopsis of the Flying Boat, with superb graphics and animation. A high quality documentary. Subscribed
@Rangayuthtube4 жыл бұрын
they should try to bring it back, sounds like the perfect toy for modern-day billionaires, this beats super yachts Anyday,
@ressljs4 жыл бұрын
I am kind of surprised there wasn't a small market for flying boats as a type of booze cruise vessel. I could see using them to bounce around resorts in the Caribbean or Mediterranean.
@NaenaeGaming4 жыл бұрын
I guess the ultra rich can afford both large aircraft for personal use (everything from a Leerjet to a 747 or even an A380) AND a super yacht, so they wouldn’t be looking for anything in the middle really. If anything, a flying boat would be a compromise - less space than a boat and slower/less efficient than an airliner
@idontwanttopickone4 жыл бұрын
I mean there's the AG600.
@quantumleap40234 жыл бұрын
@@NaenaeGaming A lot of superyachts already have helicopters on them.
@mattdyer95444 жыл бұрын
@@ressljs Many PBY-5 Catalinas were converted after WW2, with the turrets replaced with bubble windows, some are still in service.
@lancematthews98974 жыл бұрын
I’m just waiting for him to do the AN-225, anyone else ?
@lancematthews98974 жыл бұрын
The Comfy Chair Like it was designed as a Spacecraft transport but now it operates as a cargo charter
@luissemedo35974 жыл бұрын
YES
@HarrisChoudhry4 жыл бұрын
YES
@granttoye58523 жыл бұрын
I would love to see a major airline today take a crack at a brand new flying boat concept for 2020. Even if it's just a novelty or a marketing tool
@elliottd3233 жыл бұрын
Yes but it would be for the 1 percent as the upkeep costs and if it's so heavy with all the luxury fuel consumption
@truthislam64813 жыл бұрын
Grant, can you imagine one with electric motors and batteries? There is a company in Sweden, I think that B.Gates is funding to produce a small fully electric airliner!
@iamarizonaball26423 жыл бұрын
I would if I had 1 trillion I would fund any flying boat
@kashutosh91323 жыл бұрын
@@iamarizonaball2642 I will donate 1 trillion to you for this project as soon as I earn 10 trillion
@ranran28063 жыл бұрын
The weight of the batteries alone would be reason enough as to why it’s a bad idea. Not to mention the cost of excavating materials for the batteries would end up with more Emissions.
@zacharybarnes41104 жыл бұрын
Mustard: posts new video Me: AIRPLANES!!!!!!
@georgemoore32154 жыл бұрын
Bro did you watch the vid- it’s a seaplane
@avgjoeavglife4 жыл бұрын
Yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!
@indayteray86474 жыл бұрын
Mustard: flying boat Me, an intellectual: *swimming plane*
@pim23774 жыл бұрын
Why doesn’t have this comment more likes
@Nordic_Mechanic4 жыл бұрын
swimmin plane exist, its called a submarine doofus!
@str75234 жыл бұрын
Veikra but does it fly other then In the water
@tommipickalommi26894 жыл бұрын
@@pim2377 Because its not funny
@mikipav10644 жыл бұрын
The more i hear about civil aviation history, the more i’m convinced that it’s just a sad tale of amazing aircrafts failing because of way to profit driven airlines. Everything fast or comfortable fails because of the “costs are to high” philosophy.
@hernerwerzog97004 жыл бұрын
Well, it isn't "profit driven" A failed investement, an unprofitable one, would surely end in bankruptcy of that company E.g. the the Princess would be an complete and utter failure and would create 0 profit.
@Rynewulf4 жыл бұрын
@@hernerwerzog9700 Even if it could have been helpful? Pushed nautical technology forward? Humanity is held back by profit driven metrics, especially considering the imaginary nature of fiat currency in the first place
@hernerwerzog97004 жыл бұрын
@@Rynewulf Even if it was helpful, it wouldn't be supported if it was too expensive We (sadly) live in a capitalistic society, where the profit of one is more important than the good of all
@Vlad-19864 жыл бұрын
anything cool, really. Aeroplanes are slowly getting lamer, slower and less safe.
@slojogojo27664 жыл бұрын
Nicht Sion Wagner People don't mass migrate to non socialist countries and no Western Europe "IS NOT" socialist !
@kg_canuck4 жыл бұрын
So if the war hadnt required tons of airfields to be constructed, we might be flying in turbojet ocean liners?
@teddytatyo4 жыл бұрын
It just meant that we would take an extra 10 years to transition to normal land planes. Economics always wins out in the end
@McHeisenburger4 жыл бұрын
Man what I wouldn’t give for flying boat airliners.
@MachineMan-mj4gj4 жыл бұрын
I remember seeing designs for an ultra-long range flying boat that used 747's as pontoon floats.
@totallyfrozen4 жыл бұрын
I’ve been fascinated by them for years. I’ve always wanted to fly in one.
@trainfan-ks5hk4 жыл бұрын
Practically flying cruise liners
@badscrewold31624 жыл бұрын
Let me guess: you wouldn't give your money they were asking for a ticket...
@DugrozReports4 жыл бұрын
Would you give $4,000 - $5,000 for an economy ticket on one? If not, that's why they failed.
@b-chroniumproductions31774 жыл бұрын
"the war hadn't been fought with flying boats" The PBY-5 Catalina in both the Pacific and Atlantic theatres: am I joke to you?
@elanlynn59734 жыл бұрын
庄司 慎吾 - Shōji Shingo Meaningless arguments never get old.
@Tigershark_30824 жыл бұрын
Darn good point there.
@jennifercheung64644 жыл бұрын
Let’s get some double crash action going
@akindudeerada58404 жыл бұрын
Y, even the short sunderland had its own share of victories in the second world war as a bomber. Also, if u are not mentioning the blom and Voss bv-238 then u gotta be kidding me! That thing was the largest flying boat to participate in ww2.
@erzhaider4 жыл бұрын
@@akindudeerada5840 Although that only existed in extremely small numbers
@nicocathelot11394 жыл бұрын
Modern jet liner: who are you? Princess: I used to rule the world
@rjelstyx49094 жыл бұрын
she never did though
@algerianprophet96544 жыл бұрын
Never did, lol.
@nicocathelot11394 жыл бұрын
Wut ever
@trainfan-ks5hk4 жыл бұрын
Me: *starts singing*
@algerianprophet96544 жыл бұрын
@@trainfan-ks5hk k
@Liberator74 Жыл бұрын
We need modern flying boats! 💗
@afilleduptaco4 жыл бұрын
The only channel I ever get excited when they upload
@aidang54094 жыл бұрын
Landing Gear: _Exists_ Sauders-Roe: *I'm gonna stop you right there*
@hexaltheninjawow95314 жыл бұрын
Especially on water.
@jamiejamesbaker92214 жыл бұрын
Steve Harvey???
@sirrliv4 жыл бұрын
As much as I understand the economic practicality of it, it breaks my heart to see the grandeur and opulence of the past fallen to the wayside like this. These days we've forgotten what phrases like "Luxury Travel" really mean; it's not just some extra legroom and complementary "champagne", it's feeling like you're stepping into a flying palace, something to make your heart flutter rather than just shrug and think "Mm, not bad." That said, I have to wonder if there might be a niche market for ultra-luxury flying boats in today's high-end tourist market, a special means for the absurdly rich to be pampered on their way to grand resorts in the Bahamas, or South America, or the Javanese Islands. Heck, there are parts of New Zealand or Japan where commercial flying boat service might make legitimate fiscal sense on a more moderate scale.
@RainingDarkChocolate4 жыл бұрын
I too can see it being a thing in this era of luxury
@DrewLSsix4 жыл бұрын
No, today flying in luxury is flying in an opulent private jet. Bypassing the crowds and even the various security screens to fly at your discretion pretty much when and wherever you like. You can have the entire cabin to your self for the ultimate in legroom or bring on wait staff and private chefs, a masseuse , bartender or whatever you could desire really.
@JohnJ4694 жыл бұрын
I've long hoped for the gas bags to come back. You can fly Australia to London in 24 hours, cramped into a tiny seat with average food or take 3 days, eating in a restaurant and sleeping in your cabin, sitting in the Observation lounge being served fresh coffee as you watch the world pass below. To quote Dr Eckener: "You do not travel in an airship, you voyage".
@rlh16894 жыл бұрын
How about affordable luxury like this one promised for the average person who can afford to pay a little more to travel like this? Why cater to the rich of today while the average person could enjoy this today.
@McLarenMercedes4 жыл бұрын
@@DrewLSsix How about those that are well-off economically and can afford luxury travel but not rich enough to afford their own private jet?? Do you live in a world of polarized extremes?? There are people rich enough to own their own private houses or apartments in different cities, yes, but most live in hotels during their visit. And while most of those live in affordable hotels there are also those well-off enough to be able to pay 4-5 times the regular tariff for a room so they go to luxury hotels.
@enoughofyourkoicarp3 жыл бұрын
9:14 Everyone: "It's big, impractical and ridiculously expensive, I'll pass." America: "I'll take five!"
@susangardini81613 жыл бұрын
America: I'Ll TAke YoUR EntiRe StocK
@matthewmosier84393 жыл бұрын
Actually, overexpensive is owned by European engineering. I mentioned to some people yesterday that Europeans spend 4 times as much to achieve 5% greater results. And when it comes to cars that's actually an understatement
@Salah.Ad-Din3 жыл бұрын
@@susangardini8161 Salty europoor
@leroy11544 жыл бұрын
Where are the eccentric billionaires when you need them? It would be amazing to see someone build something like that last design and get it flying, if only for the novelty.
@meghanachauhan93804 жыл бұрын
They're gaying around with random dudes cuz 21st Century
@voidofspaceandtime46844 жыл бұрын
@@meghanachauhan9380 Epstein moment
@fisterB4 жыл бұрын
One of them is building a Space Ship factory in Texas for the conquest of the solar system now. Better than looking back but I agree that it is a pity we don't have a flying Princess still in flying condition or a replica.
@jayperry8264 жыл бұрын
al dajjal shah e dunya had to use the word gay as a negative
@FalbertForester4 жыл бұрын
I've promised myself that should I land in the billion dollar net worth category, my first big purchase will be a new production Boeing Model 314. Boeing needs $$$, I need a flying boat, I'm sure we can come to an agreement.
@grassh0pper4 жыл бұрын
I have a bit of fear flying over the ocean and this would have calmed me down
@VictorDude984 жыл бұрын
Especially since you’re pretty much dead if something goes wrong while crossing the Atlantic
@ashakydd14 жыл бұрын
That is if the ocean is calm enough to land on where you are and your airliner is doing well enough to land.
@exoressdelivers704 жыл бұрын
I have a fear of flying over the ocean to but agreed to fly only on Chalk's Airline seaplane that went from Ft. Lauderdale to Bimini. I reasoned that if the engines failed the plane could land on water. Just weeks before my scheduled flight one of their planes crashed into the ocean shortly after take off due to engine failure. All aboard were killed.
@vbscript24 жыл бұрын
Not me. Try landing one of these things on ocean swells. Not exactly easy, especially at the speeds that a turbojet or turboprop one would need to land. The engines back then were *far* less reliable than they are now. Since the dawn of the ETOPS era (i.e. the era in which we've flown across oceans in twin-engine aircraft,) I'm not aware of even a single incident of an airliner crashing or ditching into the ocean due to loss of power.
@tomberg92194 жыл бұрын
I doubt that a flying boat's hull would've survived a landing in rough seas.
@GandalfTheWho4 жыл бұрын
Flew to Lord Howe island in a flying boat back when I was a kid, about 50 years ago. A great memory.
@clintelkins96303 жыл бұрын
"Landplanes can't land on water" Mustard: shows a water plane land on the Hudson Sulley: I can do that, easy
@brotheralaric71773 жыл бұрын
mhh, i wouldnt say easy.
@trolly42333 жыл бұрын
It only landed for a few minutes though, before it sank into the “runway”
@uwetheiss9703 жыл бұрын
@@trolly4233 Do you consider standing on a gate still as landing? He landed it. What happend after isnt part of the landing. You can land a land plane on water. But only once cause they cant swim.
@Salah.Ad-Din3 жыл бұрын
Oh my God, when will people shut up about sulley
@ArpanD4 жыл бұрын
So sad: "The Story Of The Princess That Never Ruled [the skies]" !!! Really they could at least keep 1 plane alive just fro show in museum, the design was awesome. Why did they sell the parts of ALL the planes? It really was a bold concept, so long back, despite being a commercial failure, I salute Saunders-Roe for their innovative gamble. Thanks for the video Mustard
@meghanachauhan93804 жыл бұрын
Cuz muneez
@tyrstone35394 жыл бұрын
Cuz muneez
@xanx35724 жыл бұрын
Cuz muneez
@Kaebuki4 жыл бұрын
Cuz muneez
@zodiotekgaming4 жыл бұрын
One reason being what he literally said clearly in the video. The airframes after being in long term storage corroded and rotten through, because salty water
@samovarmaker96734 жыл бұрын
last time i was this early, the Saunders-Roe Princess was still flying
@ghajik.4 жыл бұрын
sadly I wasn't alive then
@davidvasquez084 жыл бұрын
Ghajik same here
@Onegaiprofessor4 жыл бұрын
Oof
@livethefuture24924 жыл бұрын
It never flew with any airline.
@KarlBunker4 жыл бұрын
You had me at "bar and lounge." Where can I buy tickets? And hey, good pitch for Curiosity Stream; I'ma click that link!
@Jehty_4 жыл бұрын
At Qatar Airways, Emirates, etc.
@livethefuture24924 жыл бұрын
For about 10,000$ sure.
@SaxonSuccess4 жыл бұрын
I remember seeing them parked up in Cowes. It would have been around 1953 ish, and we sailed from somewhere in Dorset to the I of W on a paddle steamer, then a coach tour around the Island. We were on a holiday visiting relatives in Poole at the time... So steam trains were involved too. Those were the days... (Takes off rose tinted spectacles, and makes a brew.)
@tommot72362 жыл бұрын
Excellent comment! We must both be a similar vintage! 😂👍
@bobfreestone17522 жыл бұрын
Adrian, Lovely comment that brought back memories aplenty ! I was 5 in '53, and left the IOW having lived near Bembridge for about three years, after my father left the marines based at Southsea. Keep the RT glasses on...... Bob.
@leejones50264 жыл бұрын
Aww, why do such beautiful things like this always die out? I always loved flying boats and wish their were still around as I would have liked to ride the Princess.
@leejones50264 жыл бұрын
To hell with that! I wanna travel in style! But you're right, that's why we can't have nice things like flying boats.
@oakoakoak22194 жыл бұрын
@A Frustrated Gamer You'd be surprise how hard it is to make a profit by being an airlines. The fact that they treat us like cattle is because they have to. otherwise they would never make any revenue. So yeah you gotta understand that too
@yawteg4 жыл бұрын
TailSpin taught me about these as a kid in the 90's.
@brianhall41824 жыл бұрын
Yup. Talespin made me love the concept of the flying boat. The PBY Catalina, Pan AM's Clipper service, flying to exotic locales in relative luxury, all during an era of rapidly evolving technology.
@trollking994 жыл бұрын
The Sea Duck!
@RuskiWaffle4 жыл бұрын
Huh? I'm late to the party, can you guys explain?
@EndricksGame4 жыл бұрын
"Or even plane prejudice" Heh.
@DavidCurryFilms4 жыл бұрын
I sea what you did there...
@makhenaten3 жыл бұрын
Such a pity flying boats aren’t kept as a unique boutique travel option - nothing like them, and they, plus airships, truly excite me always✨🚀✨
@investorbloke4 жыл бұрын
Seaplanes were actually very important in WW2. They were utilised in various tasks from anti-submarine patrols to air-sea rescue and gunfire spotting for battleships. They sank submarines, recovered downed airmen and operated as scout aircraft over the vast distances of the Pacific and the Atlantic, as well as with UK coastal command.
@plushifoxed4 жыл бұрын
"a plane designed for a future that never existed" is this hauntology
@traptownkys19474 жыл бұрын
Sadalogy
@VCYT4 жыл бұрын
something like that line is the next democrat party slogan.
@DragonEXtwo4 жыл бұрын
That's what I was thinking.
@plushifoxed4 жыл бұрын
@@VCYT penus and balles
@chai66694 жыл бұрын
Witchcraft
@CyriacS4 жыл бұрын
This channel is by far my favorite on youtube. Thank you for making such amazing videos!!
@dominichoughton81192 жыл бұрын
Someone else has probably already mentioned it, but you can see one of the Saunders-Roe flying boat jet fighters (the SR.A/1) at the Solent Sky Museum in Southampton, UK. They also have a Short Sandringham flying boat you can go inside and look around in.
@AtheistOrphan2 жыл бұрын
Visited last weekend. Excellent little museum.
@phiutubeful4 жыл бұрын
Does anyone else want one of those desk models he shows? Like, imagine those beautiful models sitting on your desk... oh wait... does he make those? IDK Yes, I know that they’re cgi, but if only we could 3D print them...
@flybobbie14494 жыл бұрын
There are companies that will custom make any aircraft model, they are in India and far east. Just look them up and reasonably priced.
@cdogg17874 жыл бұрын
it's a 3D model. Mustard makes all the 3D models for his videos
@Fartsmucker14 жыл бұрын
They are available, my very good pal George Dexter carved the prototype for the production run. He also built a 10 foot span PSS glider version which looked fantastic in the air.
@liu74 жыл бұрын
Mustard makes all the 3D models he showcases in his videos.
@DrWhom4 жыл бұрын
@@liu7 It is really clever to present them as table-top models. As CGI, they are good but would not be convincing enough as part of a life-action movie (no disparagement, this is a one-guy outfit, and you probably know how many cgi people work on feature films). But as a table top model, they look like every boy's dream.
@mohammedbucheery43714 жыл бұрын
I was literally reading about his plane and other flying boats over the past few days, and it’s such an awesome coincidence that you happen to make a video out of it! Thank you so much!
@ejtamayo53174 жыл бұрын
Videos: Awsome Detail: Amazing Commentary: 999/10
@aj-2savage8964 жыл бұрын
FANTASTIC CGI illustrating a FANTASTIC subject. You left out the Conroy conversion concept.
@YTartschool4 жыл бұрын
This was fascinating, thanks for the quality entertainment :)
@CuoreSportivo4 жыл бұрын
i'm not even mad this channel uploads so rarely, since when they do, they're spot on!
@tomasjakovac79504 жыл бұрын
This was all I needed for Valentine's Day :)
@venugopalank.v23364 жыл бұрын
I loved the way how the music dropped at 4:45
@kleenexbox9743 жыл бұрын
yeah, its kinda funny I feel like "what do you mean nobody wants these?"
@williamschwan2074 жыл бұрын
6:47 missed a great opportunity to call it plane prejudice. This is why their flying boats never took off (pun intended)
@johnjephcote76364 жыл бұрын
I remember the abandoned hulks sitting at Calshot Castle. By the way, over here we pronounce the two words 'flying boat' as if they were written 'flyingboat'.
@rfvxrfvx52784 жыл бұрын
when do you remember last seeing them?
@williamfulgham20104 жыл бұрын
I know, sometimes you Brits run words together like that and we can't even understand what you're saying over here in the states. I guess since you guys originated the language, you can do just about whatever the hell you want to do to the words, and get away with it.
@johnjephcote7636 Жыл бұрын
I think, maybe 1958 or '59.@@rfvxrfvx5278
@johnjephcote7636 Жыл бұрын
@@williamfulgham2010 Ha ha! It is just that 'flyingboat' is a compound noun, whereas 'flying (pause) boat' has only one noun (boat) and 'flying' is the adverb.The sense is different.
@SAMPLETEXT2853 жыл бұрын
Imagine what commercial Aviation would be like if aerospace designers and engineers had no restrictions and could build whatever they wanted We would truly be in a different world.
@Zawmbbeh2 жыл бұрын
interwar planes seem to fit this concept! lots of cool stuff was born there
@jscott10002 жыл бұрын
I'd start with flying aircraft carriers
@edwingeorge10 Жыл бұрын
I would go for nuclear fusion jets
@TechMaster-ug4ft4 жыл бұрын
I love the 3D animations and renders on this channel.
@doughembree32994 жыл бұрын
fantastic video! It's really cool seeing the ambitious history of flying boats beyond the H-4 Hercules, and it's always sad to see just how much potential was lost with these designs. I feel like the history of the SR.A/1 must be a pretty fascinating just on it's own, it's not every day that you saw someone try to develop a flying boat jet fighter.
@Cby05304 жыл бұрын
6:03 Saunders-Roe still remained committed to flying boats. That's what kills a company.
@Imtahotep3 жыл бұрын
This is where Titanic meets lighter than air, I think they once hoped the Hindenburg would/could meet the luxury requirements but as far as hydrogen was concerned there was a 'steep and fiery down side' onto the rock like sandy shores of New Jersey. My wife's people say, "vakapuna", a "boat" that, "jumps" into the air: nothing is more romantic to me than this connection to the south Pacific. Were I not here. Faka 'ofa pe 'au!
@freddieallan3583 Жыл бұрын
Always loved flying boats ..love seeing them in old movies
@rangamans10604 жыл бұрын
"What if we make a Bristol Brabazon but... now hear me out... we make it float"
@rangamans10604 жыл бұрын
@MichaelKingsfordGray shit my bad, I didn't catch that. Cheers
@jessewheinrichs3 жыл бұрын
Im convinced that a flying boat would be amazing. Like going on a cruise with more range and the luxury accommodations.
@AlbertaGeek Жыл бұрын
Pretty naive of you to assume that in any given airplane regardless of size that the airline companies wouldn't still be cramming in as many seats as possible.
@seeingeyegod4 жыл бұрын
"The comet brought in a new era of people experiencing explosive decompression and falling to their deaths from speeds not thus far attained"
@loicdeniel83614 жыл бұрын
The princess had a pressurized hull lad.
@keithwaites99914 жыл бұрын
What ruined the Comet was - as yet unknown - metal fatigue. .no aircraft had flown higher or faster for so long ( jet fighters could only sustain high speeds for short periods )
@auroratherob0t2 жыл бұрын
This is by far my favorite video made by him
@ethanjones15214 жыл бұрын
I need the Saunders-roe ocean liner plane to be built! Can you imagine how awesome it would be to fly halfway around the world in sea plane like that! Holy crap!
@robertknowles26992 жыл бұрын
Can the weight be like an AL bicycle? It can be far safer for hikers, Darwin on the Trail minimalist ultra light folks, or people who like coast and safety of landing following river route. Hybrid decending windmill for acceleration later?
@danroberts90504 жыл бұрын
Well, I'm wagering everything I've got that they come back. I just bought a ton of Saunders-Roe stock from a guy in a '72 Pontiac.
@meghanachauhan93804 жыл бұрын
I'll make those motherfuckers come back. Vertical flight ftw
@jrt8184 жыл бұрын
Check with a broker before you depose of stock from defunct companies. Sometimes they were absorbed by companies who are still around and might have considerable value.
@danroberts90504 жыл бұрын
@@jrt818 I'll.... do that.
@jay999_4 жыл бұрын
Hey that's the same guy who sold me these awesome speakers.. But he had a white van though...
@thebasiclegoman32623 жыл бұрын
The trouble is, 30’s 40’s 50’s and 60’s had creativity for their future. And most of the time put them into action, but the 21 century just think anything that doesn’t look average is to far fetched and impossible. It makes me sad. I, personally, would love to see a massive cruise liner in the sky.
@sylak21122 жыл бұрын
Those jet seaplanes drawing have suhc a elegance to them. So sleek. It is a shame we don't at least have some of them around.