If you're reading this, I love you. And more importantly, Jesus loves you. It's mindblowing to me that Jesus loves me. I assure you that I don't deserve it. Life is hard, I know you know that. But I'm encouraging you to keep your faith in the Lord until the end. If you don't have faith in the Lord, you better get some quickly. Everything is not okay, quite the contrary, but it will be. I look forward heaven, brother and sister, and I hope to see you there. I can hardly wait. Jesus Christ is Lord!
@DaiyveАй бұрын
Your channel and books have been a blessing for many lives, no one has ever conducted these conversations with as much evidence or in the right spirit as you.
@WatchingThereАй бұрын
Dear DD, many thanks for this video and for the clarification on "BY HIM" not "through Him" and the implications thereof. Blessings from 🇬🇧 keep pressing on 📖✝️🙏
@Scott48-w9i29 күн бұрын
by whom also he made the worlds that imply through
@Daiyve29 күн бұрын
@@Scott48-w9i The bible has always leveled with us on this topic, in the beginning "God said", and Jesus is The Word of God. God's word is both God and the one whom sent it. It's abstract but that is the mystery of godliness.
@gwencowan236729 күн бұрын
THAT was Great! HALLELUJAH! AMEN! I continue to pray for Chick Publications,the Chick Publications family, you Bro. Daniels and your family. The Lord keep His hedge of protection 'round about you all.
@DontLikeCubes28 күн бұрын
*alleluia Do believe if not mistaken the kjv has the name "jehovah" added which was created out of nowhere in the 1500s. (Occult appears to exist from 1000s and possibly during the early church days)
@billbates468229 күн бұрын
Dear Brother David: Most definitely Blessed with your very important and very special message about how accurate, faithful and true the King James Bible is, as far as upholding God's Word is concerned most of all! May the Lord continue to Bless your very important and very special ministry at Chick Publications most of all, especially if the Lord continues to tarry, as well. ❤️ Brother Bill
@JesusChristisMichaelsLord29 күн бұрын
I LOVE MY KJV BIBLE...
@marcyoverby381729 күн бұрын
SAME HERE,, ALSO...AMERICA STANDARD BIBLE..THESE TWO ARE MY FAVORITE AND ONLY....
@Tracy-Inches28 күн бұрын
@@marcyoverby3817 I love what Yeshua read too, the LXX/Septuagint
@Tracy-Inches28 күн бұрын
Which KJV? The one with the 14 books that were removed around 1880, or the current modern western version?
@DontLikeCubes28 күн бұрын
@@Tracy-Inches"yeshua" is NOT Jesus. Jesus is a king. "yeshua" is metatron, aka "the prince". Did Jesus not warn you about a prince?🤔
@Tracy-Inches28 күн бұрын
@@DontLikeCubes Whoa! Yeshua is a Hebrew name that is often used as an alternative to Jesus. It's a variation of the name Yehoshua, which means "Yahweh is salvation" and is rooted in the Hebrew Bible. Yeshua is also said to mean "rescue," "deliver," or "save". In the Hebrew Bible, Yeshua was a common alternative to Yehoshua in later books and among Jews during the Second Temple period. Yeshua in Hebrew is a verbal derivative from "to rescue", "to deliver". Among the Jews of the Second Temple period, the Biblical Aramaic/Hebrew name יֵשׁוּעַ, Yēšūaʿ was common: the Hebrew Bible mentions several individuals with this name - while also using their full name Joshua. Yeshua in English Jesus' name in Hebrew was “Yeshua” which translates to English as Joshua. Yeshua was a common alternative form of the name Yehoshua in later books of the Hebrew Bible and among Jews of the Second Temple period. The name corresponds to the Greek spelling Iesous, from which, through the Latin IESVS/Iesus, comes the English spelling Jesus.
@luvbowhunting29 күн бұрын
Excellent Bro.David‼️ You were born for such a time as this‼️🙌👏👏👏👏👏
@thewaytolifepublications29 күн бұрын
Amen! KJV has all of God’s Words!
@johnnyvans_7724 күн бұрын
KJV IS THE PURE WORD OF GOD I BELIEVE THAT GOD USE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO PRESERVE HIS WORD IM A FILIPINO BUT TAGALOG BIBLE IS CORRUPTED AND GOD LEAD ME TO READ KJV, I BELIEVE THAT GOD USE ENGLISH LANGUAGE BECAUSE ENGLISH LANGUAGE IS THE MOST SPOKEN UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE 🔥👑✝️
@mikefrench478729 күн бұрын
Amen and Hallelujah ♥️🩸🔥🙌
@end-days29 күн бұрын
Thy word above thy name
@ufbunitingfaithfulbeliever74027 күн бұрын
Amen Amen Amen!
@AVKingJamesBible29 күн бұрын
Wooo hooo another video! 👍
@paulflannigan88826 күн бұрын
David W Daniels, thank you for your pursuit of the truth and standing up for God's Word. It's bleak out there in the "church". Just read through these comments.
@sound-the-alarm725 күн бұрын
Best times right now because just as Peter wrote we also have The Word of God made more sure. Prophecies happening right now exactly as written. Praying we all have the word in our heart. "Sanheidrin" has been taken away... "Holy of Holies" has been taken away "Berean" has been taken away Grievous times but the good news is Jesus who "Who" not "which" is the only one who makes the bitter waters sweet.
@Qty777729 күн бұрын
Few SDAs uplift the KJV, much appreciate the channel The KJV is very BEST!
@DontLikeCubes28 күн бұрын
sda have an upside down cross as the logo, and do believe if not mistaken the kjv has the name "jehovah" added which was created out of nowhere in the 1500s. (Occult appears to exist from 1000s and possibly during the early church days)
@DontLikeCubes28 күн бұрын
sda have an upside down cross as the logo, and do believe if not mistaken the kjv has the name "jehovah" added which was created out of nowhere in the 1500s. (Occult appears to exist from 1000s and possibly during the early church days)
@biblereadingoutreach228429 күн бұрын
*A LITTLE LEAVEN DOES WHAT?* Galatians 5:7-9 Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth? This persuasion cometh not of him that calleth you. A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.
@huntncover29 күн бұрын
The supernatural Bible changes are real . Any older person that memorized scripture 50 years ago can testify to that . There's more than one reason God had us memorize His Word - He knew that this would happen , hence the warning at the end of Revelation , and Amos 8 : 11,12. Jesus mentioned also that " Heaven and earth will pass away , but my words will not pass away . " He knew that someone ( The devil ) , would begin to try this , but fail miserably . " He will seek to change the times and the Law , and they shall be given into his hand for a time , times , and a half a time " . This is very real , and the precious KJV is his biggest target .
@Mr-pn2eh29 күн бұрын
Mandela effect does not exist you fool
@Daiyve29 күн бұрын
I'll trust the bible over the memory of the older people. Haven't you heard of the Mandela effect? Satan is changing the name of children's books and peanut butter too? When some misquote, those that hear will take it as true and remember it as true. There are black and white movies misquoting the verse, the collective used those kind of sources as the bible rather than the actual bible.
@ohgin1234529 күн бұрын
What are you implying. That the Bible changed? You devil?
@huntncover28 күн бұрын
@@Daiyve Go look in your old KJV Bible in Matthew in the first chapter . Tell the truth - Is Jesus descended from Judah , or Judas ? Boaz or Booz ? In the parable about new wine in old wineskins , where did the wineskins go ? Bottles now . In Psalms we were told to hide His Word in our hearts . That's exactly what a lot of us did , and there's more than one reason for it .
@Daiyve28 күн бұрын
@@huntncover The name Hebrew Judah is Judas in Greek, just as Elijah became Elias. It has always said bottles, the word wineskin is not even found in the 1828 American dictionary. I know the idea that you are living in a paranoid hysteria of magical attacks is a humbling concept and would be embarrassing if it were true, but I'm just leveling with you so that you can overcome it and have peace and proper faith in your bible once again. It's not good for you to believe all the bibles of the earth have changed like the tower of babel, especially since it is not true. Is there anything I can possibly say to convince you otherwise? Humanity believes "someone" changed jiff peanut butter to jiffy and satan cared enough to change the berenstain bears name. Was he just testing out the large hadron collider mguffin before he fired it at the KJV? Don't make your Christian ambassadorship into a mockery.
@msweat29 күн бұрын
I'm just amazed that anyone mentions a Ford Aerostar. Hardly any are still running, axel notwithstanding.
@Mr-pn2eh29 күн бұрын
It's just an example sentence
@msweat29 күн бұрын
@@Mr-pn2eh well yeah. I realize that.
@joshuaa307528 күн бұрын
Regardless of this damming information, Converting people that force usage/adoption of the modern Bibles in most churches is nearly as difficult as changing post and mid trib rapture believers to pre trib believers
@Daiyve26 күн бұрын
The modern church would still be in rough shape even if they had a proper translation, it's more a symptom of their indifference rather than the cause of it. The scholars and institutions also force or pressure them to use the bad translations.
@jsko8227 күн бұрын
Btw... "forth" is the only word that is mentioned 888 times in KJV.
@curtisjones616228 күн бұрын
Being a Ford of course it needed fixing!
@talia438523 күн бұрын
There is no such expression as God the Son in the entire KJV Bible. Always the Son of God, which is not the same. God bless all from Poland.
@user-cw4dc3jc6s25 күн бұрын
Brother David - many thanks for this. I often read the Louise Segond French translation of the NT. I believe it is based on the same text as the KJV NT - can you advise on this?
@austinvestrand45853 күн бұрын
How often do you speak at out at Churches? I Pastor Lighthouse Baptist Church and would like to have you sometime.
@vasnellen915829 күн бұрын
Considering the first books of the compilation were written by Moses, then all the translations, then the selection and compilation that was adjusted and formatted to fit what became the King James, there are obvious imperfections. Missing but mentioned is the Book of Jasher, Book of the Acts of Solomon, all the books of the laws of Moses, all the books of the Kings of Israel and Judah, the book of Samuel the Seer, the book of Nathan the Prophet, the book of Gad the Seer, the book of Nathan the Prophet, The prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite, and in The Visions of Iddo the Seer against Jeroboam the son of Nebat, Book of Shemaiah the Prophet, and of Iddo the Seer, and Book of the vision of Nahum the Elkoshite. Is it surprising these words are also found in scripture? 2 Nephi 12:45 And because my words shall hiss forth, many of the Gentiles shall say, A bible, a bible, we have got a bible, and there can not be any more bible. 2 Nephi 12:46 But thus saith the Lord God: O fools, they shall have a bible; and it shall proceed forth from the Jews, mine ancient covenant people. 2 Nephi 12:53 Thou fool, that shall say, A bible, we have got a bible, and we need no more bible. 2 Nephi 12:54 Have ye obtained a bible save it were by the Jews? 2 Nephi 12:64 Wherefore, because that ye have a bible, ye need not suppose that it contains all my words; neither need ye suppose that I have not caused more to be written: What is most important is that a persons name is found in the Book of Life on judgement day.
@DWDaniels29 күн бұрын
God did not choose to preserve those words. He kept His promise to preserve His words. And the Book of Mormon you quoted has been changed over 3,000 times, with no documents whatsoever to justify a single change. I suggest you read the King James Bible and pray for understanding.
@Mr-pn2eh29 күн бұрын
David Daniel's is an ex Mormon by the way so therefore he knows what he is talking about.
@kathleenking4726 күн бұрын
You're a Mormon?! Even they don't know about The 6/9/1978 clause Joseph Smith, may have made it up...
@berean65Ай бұрын
The 2 King James Bibles that I have, have words changed, words added. I noticed that one of the KJV bibles I have shows the name Thomas Nelson Publishing on it. The other one I have is from the World Publishing Company, Cleveland and New York. 22311 West 110th St. Cleveland 2, Ohio Haven't yet checked to see if any verses are missing. I haven't been able to get a hold of a real, uncorrupted KJV bible. Also, the dollar tree stores are selling KJV bibles that are printed in China. Those are also corrupted. Would love to get a real uncorrupted KJV bible but haven't found any.
@unitedstatesirie7431Ай бұрын
you have the 'New King James' version ?
@berean65Ай бұрын
@@unitedstatesirie7431 No. Mine says Authorized King James on it.
@mva1965Ай бұрын
@@berean65I’ve noticed this also, so I no longer buy Thomas Nelson bibles.
@berean65Ай бұрын
@@mva1965 I don't either, however, I can't find an uncorrupted KJV bible anywhere. The only thing I can do is correct the corrupted changes and put them back to the original format of the King James Authorized 1611 bible.
@berean65Ай бұрын
@@unitedstatesirie7431 The NKJV bible is also corrupted.
@eisenhornoverlip472422 күн бұрын
Didnt God say in deuteronomy 14:24-26 that they could exchange their tithe for money and take it to the temple?
@benanderson411829 күн бұрын
“For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him.” (Colossians 1:16; NIV) In him, through him and for him. No doubt that Jesus was a Person of the Godhead present at creation. I've used that verse dozens of times to show that Jesus is the Creator. Sad to see Chick promoting KJV Only. Why not stick with preaching the gospel in all languages including modern English? We are saved by faith in Jesus Christ, not by faith in King James.
@cleightcleight362329 күн бұрын
Heyllo to you Jut curious since you said 'Jesus IS God the Son' I am wondering- where is that stated just as you said it in the KJV?? Or any other translation for that matter? I know we are told MANY times that Jesus IS the OF God. But I don't recall reading any passage saying Jesus IS God The Son.
@luvbowhunting29 күн бұрын
Psalms 2:7, 12; Proverbs 30:4(doesn’t say God the Son, but it is there), Hebrews 1:2, again, doesn’t SAY God the Son, but it’s there. I’m sure they may be more, but at moment, not sure where. Would have to study..
@berean6529 күн бұрын
@@cleightcleight3623 The term, "God the Son," comes from Catholicism and their pagan trinity. God is not 3 persons of a pagan trinity. That idea comes from vain Philosophies and Egyptian beliefs. Catholicism followed suit with that thinking and it bled into other denominations. Look up the pagan origins of the trinity.
@benanderson411829 күн бұрын
John 7:8 in ESV does include the word "yet." And then Jesus "stayed in Galilee." Only after the disciples went did Jesus decide it was time for him to go. No lying.
@user-cw4dc3jc6s25 күн бұрын
The plain reading of the text in the ESV does give the impression of dishonesty.
@martinlohstroh27 күн бұрын
Been through this 20 years ago. All this KJV onlyism. Just causes division in the church. Nothing wrong with most morden translations.
@Daiyve26 күн бұрын
There is only one proper translation to convey the author's intent. Do you have faith the bible is perfect? If you believe it's inherently flawed and skewed by men, then your opinion that there is nothing wrong with a modern translation would make sense.
@kathleenking4726 күн бұрын
If you have a KJV to back it It's funny 12 years ago, I used to see more KJV/NIV bibles In Christian bookstores Today, I can't find them Most churches used KJV as a basic, until 1970 When inflation, then the gas crunch happened
@Daiyve26 күн бұрын
@@kathleenking47 there is no copyright on the king James so anyone can print it and big publishers have less to profit because we already reject their footnotes that criticize the king James.
@Enemyofdabeazt23 күн бұрын
We know its you satan
@godogs8023 күн бұрын
It is obvious you have not done any study of the history of the Authorised Version(KJV) or any of the modern bibles. You would find out the big differences between The KJV and the modern, satanic bibles.
@johnlawrey218128 күн бұрын
I fail to see how using the phrase God the Son is unscriptural. Is Jesus God or is He not? And if He is the Son not the Father, why not refer to Him as God the Son? The Scriptures warn us against those who strive at words.
@toferg.826420 күн бұрын
There is a possible defense of Jesus’ honesty in the counterfeit John 7:8. But i want to refute it right after i give that defense. It’s that he used the present tense of “am”, rather than i shall not go or am not going to go. The problem with this, is that it is supposed to be in Contemporary Modern English. It’s supposed to be easy to understand. And in fact it is placed in the context of such English. If someone _today_ says i am not going to such’n’such holiday celebration, then he means it for the whole year. Now, Contemporary Critical Text bibles like to add italics more freely than the KJV. So why don’t they add a funny-font word of “yet” or “right now” or “at the moment”? I was first made aware of this from this movie: kzbin.info/www/bejne/opTLc5J5esxojKssi=w-mz_A2luldXyVyO&t=3477 . It stood out to me more when i first heard it than it does now. But the actor for Jesus raises his pitch on the word “am”, possibly trying to emphasize a present tense. Perhaps the printed version can at least make “am” bold. It’s a problem in the Critical Text. The Critical Text is counterfeit. I’m hoping i have helped y’all to be ready with an answer.
@watchmen-nehemiah4v208 күн бұрын
The KJV has italicized words all over now. Are you closely reading your KJV Bible? Also we see very basic words that are simple to pronounce with hyphens and diphthongs to purportedly help the reader correctly pronounce the name or place. These are clear additional evidences to changes to the material world ( bibles ) that are undeniable if one slows down and carefully does a biblical inspection. Jesus is The Word. Jesus does not change and God is not a liar. So know Jesus, hearken to God's voice. Know Him and obey Him. Blessings. -Bryan
@drapedup7629 күн бұрын
Why do you use the term “God the Son” it’s never that way in the KJV it’s “the Son of God” “the Son” the whole “God the Son, God the Holy Spirit, God The Father” that’s not scripture: God The Father, The Son, The Holy Spirit
@kennethnealKOGE29 күн бұрын
If Christ is divine, then his perfect life is absolutely meaningless to humanity, as it proves nothing since a god putting on a suit of flesh and refraining from sinning means nothing, as a god cannot sin.
@johnlawrey218128 күн бұрын
Jesus’ perfect life means everything to the sinner because His sinless blood as both God and Man covers all sin for the believer. If you understand that God is perfectly holy, and He will judge you by the standard of perfection, then it is VERY good news that Jesus died for your sins and rose again to make you justified.
@kennethnealKOGE26 күн бұрын
@@johnlawrey2181 If Christ is divine, then his perfect life means nothing, because it is not difficult for a god to refrain from sinning. In fact, it is impossible for a god to sin. In living a sinless life, he only did what comes naturally to him (if he is divine). That does not help me at all, because what comes naturally to me is the opposite.
@johnlawrey218122 күн бұрын
@@kennethnealKOGE If you admit that you do not live a perfect life, and that God is perfect, you are acknowledging that you will be judged by His perfect standard and thus you need a perfect Savior. Stop being stubborn and receive God’s perfect gift of salvation.
@koreyoneal262325 күн бұрын
I'm what one would call a KJV "preferist" , meaning that i prefer the KJV over the newer versions , I believe that overall the KJV is one of the best versions but not perfect . Unfortunately , the majority of you don't go far enough back into Christian history , stopping at Rome and not going back to The Jerusalem Assembly , led by Yeshua's own brother , James The Just . Sorry but The Ebionites were the original followers of Yeshua and they didn't teach the virgin birth , nor did they teach that Yeshua was some sort of "god-man" , both the virgin birth and the "god-man" views are pagan concepts and were added to the GREEK Gospels later on , the original manuscripts were written in Hebrew and Aramaic and according to what we know of the Hebrew Matthew , there was no genealogy and no birth narrative and Luke , which borrowed heavily from it , didn't have the genealogy or birth narrative either . Paul was most definitely in the wrong by saying that Yeshua became sin for us . 2 Cor 5:21 is a definite contradiction of what Yeshua said here in Matthew 5:20 : Matthew 5:20 KJV 20)"For I say unto you, That except YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven." There's no such thing as imputed righteousness , Paul was wrong and that's just one reason why The Ebionites and James The Just said that he was an apostate and a false apostle . Something else that The Ebionites didn't teach was substitutionary atonement , by animal or human , it wasn't Yeshua's death on the cross that brings salvation , it's His teachings and interpretation of The Torah that brings salvation , completely opposite of what Paul taught . One more thing , pisteuo has translated as "believe" but when it's directed at a person it means to obey that person , so throughout John's Gospel pisteuo should have been translated as OBEY UNTO YESHUA , not just "believe" in some facts about Him , my advice to you and everyone else that calls themselves a Christian , actually follow and obey Yeshua and not Paul
@PamelaSmith2001029 күн бұрын
Well, I just caught you in a lie Jesus calls himself, the son of God he's never called God the son
@watchmen-nehemiah4v2029 күн бұрын
Today's kjv has many blasphemous verses. Jesus is called an it and a thing. The Holy Spirit in kjv is called an "it" also. God is called a created being and has a Father ( kjv ! Yeee ouchhh ). God is named "Jealous" in kjv. Moses asks to see God's glory and God instead shows Moses His "back parts" .... Yes. Back parts. God is now destoying wonderfully (KJV) and God is swearing and things/events are repenting God ( KJV )... God's word is preserved with HIM psalm 12. Daniel 7:25 warns us of the changes to bibles, laws = written instructions very literally God's written instructions are altering. This IS happening regardless of our programmings, preferences and opinions. Jesus IS The Word of God ( Gospel of John chapter 1, Rev.19:13 so, "Follow Him."
@arqist29 күн бұрын
Source: "my memory." The KJV has hardly changed over time, aside from minor typographical corrections. The "changes" you mentioned simply don't exist. It's you who are distorting history and failing to see the facts clearly.
@watchmen-nehemiah4v2029 күн бұрын
@@arqist The KJV Bible is clearly altering. The KJV has been academically cited as an example of masterful usage of the English language. The cadence and grammar was once exemplary. This is not so today. There are grammatical errors and run on sentences and confused, unclear syntax on every page. Have you looked? Also we are told by God to memorize scripture numerous times. Are you saying that if Father asks of us to do this that we can't? Once you hide the word in your heart there is a preservation and these vivid memories are very reliable. There are many others that affirm and testify to Corinthians chapter 13 being the Love chapter in their KJV Bible. Judge not lest ye be judged... remember? Consider the sparrows they neither sow nor reap... remember? The Holy Spirit will confirm that bibles are changing.
@arqist29 күн бұрын
@@watchmen-nehemiah4v20 Who says it's a love chapter-God or your pastor? The KJV is the only true Word of God in this era, and there's zero evidence supporting your claims. Your memory means nothing if it doesn't align with the Bible. Leaning on emotions and memory leads to corruption, and that's how Satan manipulates people. Jeremiah 17:9 "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Isaiah 55:8-9 "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts." 1 Corinthians 3:18-20 "Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness. And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain." Proverbs 28:26 "He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered."
@arqist29 күн бұрын
@@watchmen-nehemiah4v20 Go and read your NIV and ESV. Don't mess with my KJV.
@watchmen-nehemiah4v2029 күн бұрын
@@arqist Your KJV today ( recent supernatural change ) says that God has the strength of a unicorn! 🦄!!! The correct and forever word is OX! Unicorn is blasphemous and obvious and confirmable error.
@nohandle25729 күн бұрын
I'm absolutely KJB ONLY. However the translators could not have been inspired as were the authors of our scripture. One little example: It's "Thou shalt not murder." It is not 'kill'.
@Mr-pn2eh29 күн бұрын
You contradicted yourself
@Daiyve29 күн бұрын
A person can convince themselves a murder is just a killing, you can't convince yourself a kill is just a murder. Can you see why God wrote it like this?
@nohandle25729 күн бұрын
@@Daiyve God din't write it like this! The Hebrew word is 'murder'.
@Daiyve29 күн бұрын
@@nohandle257 The meaning of words is determined by context, you have chosen to disagree with the context God determined to use. You have determined the context the translators determined is wrong, and you are right. You can be assured they put due diligence into translating the 10 commandments, read through their logic since you don't have faith in the perfectly preserved word of God. Then later maybe it will develop once the stumbling block is removed.
@nohandle25729 күн бұрын
@@Daiyve So you ascribe to the belief in Double Inspiration. I do not. King James was a great man as were most of the translators but they did not have like inspiration of Paul, the Apostle to the gentiles.
@berean65Ай бұрын
Look up the pagan origins of the trinity. The trinity doctrine comes from philosophy and paganism and Catholicism followed suit. God is not 3 persons of a trinity. The trinity is not biblical. The trinity is catholic false doctrine. The GODHEAD is biblical. Colossians 2:9 God is 3 parts, consisting of soul, body and Spirit. We are made in God's image. We also have 3 parts. We each have a soul, body and Spirit/Ruach/Nephesh which is the breath of life breathed into our nostrils to become a living soul, yet we are each, one individual. The only difference is, is that we are mortal and God is Immortal. The bible says that we who are mortal, must put on immortality. 1 Corinthians 15:53-55 When Jesus was being baptized, God sent the Holy Spirit onto Him. 1) God is the soul 2) Jesus is the body, the Word made flesh 3) The Spirit is the Holy Spirit God is 3 parts, not 3 persons. If God was 3 persons, then that would make 3 Gods, not one God. Scripture says that there is only ONE God. In order to be a complete person, you would have to have a body, soul and Spirit. When we die we are separated from our bodies. We split apart. Our Spirit goes back to God who gave it. Our bodies go back to the dust it came from, until our bodies are reunited with the Spirit/Ruach and soul.
@hermonymusofsparta29 күн бұрын
You said the trinity was false and then described it with a different word, Godhead, which means Goodhood/divinity. 1 John 5:7 KJV For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. 3 in 1. That's what the Trinity is. A tri (3) in one (nity). A Diunity would be 2 in 1 for example. A Bidant is a two pronged spear and a Trident a three pronged spear. God is 3 in 1. The word Trinity originates from Turtullian who was excommunicated by the Roman Catholics as a heretic and joined the Monatists. The Catholics just picked up the term later but they did not originate it. Paganism is polytheistic and the pagan religions did not believe in one God. The Trinity is monotheistic. So no, the Trinity is not pagan or Roman Catholic and you seem to not understand the terms.
@berean6529 күн бұрын
@@hermonymusofsparta No. You don't understand. The 3 that bear record are God the soul, Jesus the body / flesh that dwelt among us and Spirit / Holy Spirit. These 3 are 1. Look up the pagan origins of the trinity. Do some real research, instesd of being spoon fed lies from philosophers and Catholicism. If we are made in God's image, then if what you say about a trinity is true, then we should be 3 gods in one. We all know that's not true.
@arqist29 күн бұрын
@@berean65 what you described aligns with the knowledge I have, just using different terminology. Dr. Peter S. Ruckman’s book Body, Soul & Spirit thoroughly explains that concept, yet still uses the term "trinity," which hasn't caused any confusion in my understanding. So, there's no need to act as if using the term "trinity" is somehow pagan. The concept of the trinity even applies to the devil: Satan (not exactly a soul, since they don't possess souls like humans do, but can be seen as the counterpart to God the Father), Antichrist (Body), and the Spirit of the Antichrist (Spirit), which makes sense because the devil always tries to mimic God.
@berean6529 күн бұрын
@@arqist The trinty causes a lot of confusion. Mainly because the trinity doctrine comes from paganry and philosophy. Look up the pagan origins of the trinity.
@hermonymusofsparta29 күн бұрын
@@berean65The Trinity is not three gods in one. You have ignored everything I said and misrepresented the doctrine you are supposedly refuting. You are arguing over the use of the term "Trinity" more than anything because the actual doctrine you have described (Body, Soul, and Spirit) is the Trinity. 1 Timothy 1:6-7 KJV From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling; [7] Desiring to be teachers of the law; *understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.* Name one pagan religion with sources that worshipped a unified single deity in three. You can't because they didn't. They worshipped multiple gods. If the Trinity is Roman Catholic why did the Roman Catholics reject the man who came up with the term "Trinity"? Just because they picked up the term later does not mean the doctrine of the Trinity as found in 1 Jn 5:7 all of a sudden becomes pagan or Roman Catholic.
@jasonodell79er29 күн бұрын
Approach the Bible as the book that clearly explains that the earth is not a spinning ball.