What SpaceX Just Did With Falcon Heavy Shocked Whole Industry!

What SpaceX Just Did With Falcon Heavy Shocked Whole Industry!
===
#techmap #techmaps #elonmusk #starshipspacex #falcon
===
intro 0:00
Reusability 0:47
Alternative option 4:18
Rocky start 5:53
outro 8:31
===
1) SOURCES OF IMAGES AND VIDEOS
Justin: / goaliebear88
/ @goaliebear35
Jenny Hautmann: / jennyhphoto
/ jennyhphoto
===
What SpaceX Just Did With Falcon Heavy Shocked Whole Industry!
Would Nasa still boast that its space launch system is the world’s most powerful rocket at a reasonable cost?
Would ULA still settle down in the old-style rockets which cost rip-off prices?
Fortunately, those didn't happen thanks to the presence of Falcon Heavy, especially can't help but mention a vital achievement that SpaceX has already made on this vehicle.
Now, the government can save a lot of tax dollars on significant projects while the age-old companies get motivated to grow.
Furthermore, this is also a great motivation for the unicorns in rocketry to rise strongly in the twenty-first-century space race.
Find out everything in today's episode of Techmap.
What SpaceX Just Did With Falcon Heavy Shocked Whole Industry!
But before we begin, don't forget to subscribe to the channel and enable notifications to stay up-to-date with the latest news from SpaceX and the world of space.
It's not by chance a new entrant like SpaceX Falcon Heavy can easily beat the old guards like ULA's Delta 4 Heavy, Vulcan Centaur, and Nasa's Space Launch System. The secret weapon here is the capability to meet the technical requirements for the national significant programs while offering a much lower cost per launch. When mentioning the price, can't help but mention the reusability, the holy grail that SpaceX has been chasing.
What SpaceX Just Did With Falcon Heavy Shocked Whole Industry!
Unlike the fully reusable Starship, Falcon Heavy jettisons its second stage after stage separation as its brother Falcon 9 but it also throws its center core to receive additional power. It's due to its main destination tending to be a distant location like geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO) where its payload performance is reduced by the reusable technology. When recovering all three booster cores, the GTO payload is 8 tons. If only the two outside cores are recovered while the center core is expended, the GTO payload would be doubled.
The two only things they try to recover are both side boosters and a part that fewer people mention, fairing.
The fairing is located on the upper part of the rocket and consists of two half-shells made of carbon composite material that split in space. The fairing is jettisoned approximately 3 minutes into the flight and is recovered by SpaceX for the future mission.
===
Subcribe TechMap: tinyurl.com/3z5ysrtf

[@stephensfarms7165]

Question, why don’t all companies recover their payload fairing? If SpaceX can do it why can’t all of you, who don’t care. No one recovers its first stage. This is why SpaceX is ahead of all of you. Good luck 🍀.

[@techmap9]

SpaceX truly is a pioneer 👍👍👍👍

[@stephensfarms7165]

@@techmap9 Yes, they are the greatest in Aerospace and Engineering.

[@roberthayes5037]

Because of politics. Pay to do what ever you want. SpaceX are the only ones concern of space trash and the only ones that have plans to get rid of it.

[@Ron4885]

I agree 👍

[@user-ip5rf7ef4t]

6 million reasons

[@Ron4885]

Those farings really heat up on the way back 😳

[@MarioP9511]

They can use old boosters as center cores.

[@Jim-uu1qo]

We wont to see the center stage come home to no wast........ add a tuge stage to the center stage rocket

[@ew1usnr]

That scene at 1:07 is absolutely astounding.

[@techmap9]

Have a good day

[@googleaccountuser3116]

Wow, they scratched the surface of earth. NASA will be impressed. "That's amazing! We only got as far as interstellar space 60 years ago." a NASA employee commented.

[@techmap9]

😝😝😝

[@techmap9]

SpaceX does what Nasa has dreamt about

[@DemoBot-yq7dn]

Yeah, I'm still in "shock". Gonna need therapy after this one.

[@wm9782]

I'm curious as we put more of the Earth's mass in space does that change our planet's orbit trajectories?

[@davidhawkins7138]

Simple answer is no. Orbiting mass is still part of the mass of Earth. Orbiting objects do cause the center of mass of the Earth to wobble very slightly, but the wobbles balance themselves out to 0. A more complicated answer is that displacing anything on Earth (e.g.: moving your cellphone from one room to another) displaces the Earth's center of mass slightly, which then displaces the center of mass of the sun/earth orbit and will therefore change the orbit trajectory, but this effect not measurable. Earth loses roughly 90 tonnes of atmosphere to space daily and gains over 40 tonnes from meteors. This will have a bigger effect.

[@wm9782]

​@@davidhawkins7138Thank you, so does bringing stuff into the planet or transferring mass to another planet have more of an effect than leaving into orbit does? Thinking of Mars Mission when he gets it to happen. I wonder if the governments think of this. I would think long term wobbles affect the core of the planet too which supposedly is reversing direction.

[@electronicsworkbench]

It was shocking when it first flew but now it's normal. Nothing shocking now about FH. Move along.

[@techmap9]

Nasa always shocks about it. SpaceX can do what they have dreamt abt

[@REAGANBAGONA]

show it.....show it,,, show it...

[@jessicasimplicioreis3824]

Alguém assistindo??😊😊😊

[@techmap9]

As usual, a lot 😜😜😜

[@user-wu5im2uh6h]

if it makes you vomit while listening then it's possibly AI

[@malcolmmcguinness3709]

So where are all the first stage components

[@ludgatecircus15]

Elon - "The best part is no part and the less parts the better" Start with that because over the long run that philosophy is likely to make a cheaper as well as more reliable rocket. It is like old school VHS players (for readers 35 years and older). The manufacturers added more and more features, all of which had "some" useful application, but over time enough people did not need the added complex features, yet the remained on the player thus maintaining a high cost. It was great for companies to shout about their new features, but ultimately people want a VHS player not a nuclear reactor. Cut the dubiously useful features out, increase reliability, and reduce cost. In short, Elon has learned from earlier mistakes like the VHS player.

[@darkkennny1]

Klickbait. Nothing new. Move on.

[@gottfriedheumesser1994]

If the whole industry can recover from this shock? Stop with such idiotic headlines!

[@mattpkp]

AI is destroying KZbin this entire video was probably machine created.

[@cbaesemanai]

its all automated content trash

[@jessicasimplicioreis3824]

🖤🤍🖤🤍🖤

[@techmap9]

😍😍😍

[@jessicasimplicioreis3824]

@@techmap9 😘😘😘😘

[@markjeghers4408]

There's nothing shocking about it. You need to stop the dishonest clickbait exaggerations in your titles. I'm blocking you right after I post this comment, but maybe if you get a little more honest and lose the phony sensationalism, you might not lose too many more viewers after I am gone.

[@techmap9]

🥹🥹

[@tracybone3730]

Join the movement boycott McDonald's, pass it on

[@REAGANBAGONA]

where are the starship flight4 and boaster why they don't show?..they must to show, because too much advertise.

[@fionajack9160]

What Space x JUST. DID has been done before by them, so how whole industry shocked ? No need to endlessly repeat what’s already been covered Readers hungry for new info ”The two only things they try to recover are both side boosters”” Not proper English, but much fewer gaffs overall than some previous posts. If not AI composed, then maybe AI editing would catch errors?

[@techmap9]

Have a nice day 😍

[@techmap9]

I will improve it

[@Svartepetter.]

Anyway there is details meny people not yet know of.