10 Obscure Movie Clues That Explain Everything

[@paulmasuicca5304]

Of course Mr. Pink got away. He became Buddy Holly in Pulp Fiction.

[@stevenm8503]

If it was that easy to identify a replicant, they wouldn’t need all the emotional response questions.

[@johnburt7935]

They wouldn't need that expensive and delicate Voight-Kampff machine, just a penlight.

[@khatdubell]

this

[@corbz273]

Quill probably couldn't understand the language of the High Evolutionary's people because they were created specifically by him and kept only on counter earth, so their language probably wasn't commonplace around the galaxy. But that doesn't explain how Drax is able to understand it

[@AWeirdoNamedKieraDaley]

It's Drax. I don't understand a thing about him besides he's silly and I love him

[@user-lb9xw4xf2q]

People complained about villains in No Way Home? I never heard it. Besides, one of the points of the movie was to revisit past triumphs, but change them so the villain can be redeemed instead of killed or remained mutated.

[@da-vidcargill4975]

Technically, they are redeemed in alternative timeline, they are still dead or prisoned in tobit and Andrew timeline

[@user-lb9xw4xf2q]

@@da-vidcargill4975 True, but at least there are also now realities in which they are alive and reformed. Some worlds remain unchanged, since Lizard's first defeat left him depowered yet alive, however I think his experience in an alternate Earth might help him grow; plus, seeing three Spider-Men work to cure him might make him appreciate the cure instead of resent it. Though, Sandman might have a rough deal, since it was only his powers that kept Flint Marko out of prison. I don't think people learned Norman was the Goblin until his death, so he has a second chance and freedom. Probably haunted by guilt, but still, no longer lead astray by his dark half.

[@johnburt7935]

@@user-lb9xw4xf2q Flint Marko didn't die, of course. If he had, the locket would have been left behind. He allowed his sand to blow away mwlodramatically in order to give the impression hat he had despairingly "surrendered", but in truth, he reassembled himself and went right back to trying to restore his humanity.

[@natsune09]

Anton getting the money in 'No Country For Old Men' is pretty blatantly told to the viewer. He figures out where the money was hidden earlier in the movie, and it shows the money was found in the same method at the end.

[@strange137]

In NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, it's clearly shown that Chigurh found the money when Ed Tom enters the El Paso motel room after Moss's death and finds the screws from the air vent and the coin used to remove them sitting on the floor. Chigurh knew where to look because of seeing Moss hide the money in the same place back in Del Rio.

[@CharlieFlanagan]

i always assumed that when they said that kane died alone, they meant it as metaphorical, not literal. he died with no family or friends.

[@johnburt7935]

Heh, like in the mystery novel where the clueless witness says "nobody" was in the house . . . completely forgetting to think of her servants.

[@user-lb9xw4xf2q]

Mr. Pink’s capture wasn’t subtle. It was off-screen but fairly clearly the sound of him being arrested.

[@BOTHthosearetaken]

Yes! Rafts! Glad to see I'm not the only kid who played with legos in the sink (or however you learned how buoyancy works)

[@65FASTBACKMAN-dx9ge]

I'm sorry but in Jurassic Park, there's no way the T-Rex would be able to just sneak up behind Grant, Ellie and the kids without anybody seeing, hearing or smelling it. Per Google, they believe an average T-Rex was around 12' tall and approximately 40' long, with some of them possibly being as tall as 15'-20' and weighing over 8 tons. There are multiple scenes in Jurassic Park as well as the sequels where the T-Rex shakes the ground when walking and the only times it doesn't, is for reasons of suspense. With the Galiminus attack in the first movie, the Rex was likely hiding in the trees and not moving until the dinosaurs ran by, then it attacked. So, obviously it wouldn't be making any noise if it was still. Every other time besides that and at the end of the movie in the Visitor's Center, the Rex makes noise just walking. In real life there's nothing to suggest that the Rexy would've shaken the ground just walking as bigger animals than it are alive today and don't shake the ground when walking or running. There are also multiple instances in the Jurassic Park books where the characters talk about how the animals can be smelled, not just the animals themselves but with the carnivorous ones, it talks multiple times about how the characters can smell the stench of whatever it was that the dinosaur just ate. This can be confirmed in the fact that anytime you go to the zoo, you can smell the animals, even those in cages or behind windows. The movie did what they did for reasons of suspense, both the ground shaking when the T-Rex was near. As well as it somehow sneaking up on Grant, Ellie and the kids at the end of the movie to shock the audience, considering we see the characters all cornered and believe there's no way they will be able to survive. That's the only reason how both can be accomplished in the same movie and is one of the biggest frustrations with the JP movies. I like the idea of the ground shaking where like with the movie Jaws, it leaves the audience with much more suspense in that you know the Rex is around but you can't see it. It's very similar to Jaws where if you just didn't have anything at all, the water wouldn't be as scary. But when you see the water and you have the music playing, you know the shark is around somewhere but you just can't see it. Same with the T-Rex in JP, in that you know it's around you and stalking you but you have no idea where it is. This is mentioned when Ellie and Muldoon go out looking for Grant and the children, yet find Malcolm. Ellie says something to the extent of I think it's behind us, and Muldoon replies that it could be anywhere. It keeps the audience on the edge of their seats, but makes it near impossible for the Rex to sneak up on the characters at the end of the movie without seeing, hearing or smelling it. Still a great movie, though a few little things like this frustrate me about it.

[@hthrun]

I've never heard anyone complain No Way Home had too many villains. If anything, people wanted one more to make a Sinister Six...

[@johnburt7935]

Holy hat - I never even noticed...! Of course, in the Ultimate universe, Spider-Man himself was the sixth member of the Sinister Six, which I thought was pretty nifty. One of their better ideas. Better than the Wanda/Pietru subplot . . . . o_O

[@JohnDrummondPhoto]

In "The Usual Suspects", the gang surveys a docked freighter. The crew can be heard speaking an apparent Eastern European language. Dean Keaton asks, "What language is that? Russian?" Verbal Kint answers, "No. Hungarian." That's a throwaway hint to Kint's true identity as Hungarian gangster Keyser Söze. Most viewers totally missed that in real time and maybe didn't remember it even after the big reveal at the end.

[@Donathon-qx8kq]

One of the best ' twist ' in movie history

[@goodguyaus]

🤔I thought Keyser was Turkish?

[@Donathon-qx8kq]

@@goodguyaus ?...IDK...I think you're right

[@JohnDrummondPhoto]

@@Donathon-qx8kq @goodguyaus I think we're all correct. Söze was apparently Turkish but it was Hungarian gangsters that he had the famous run-in with. The ship with that witness on it was Hungarian. So I'd say that Söze was a Turk working out of Hungary and fleeing Hungarian gangsters.

[@ae_sko88]

The problem with your explanation for Titanic was the fact that she was laying perpendicular to the way Jack was trying to get on, so of course the door was going to flip over if they had both gone on the same direction at opposite ends. The door would’ve stayed buoyant and not have flipped.

[@shaggyfrankdizzl]

I always thought Mr Pink's death in reservoir dogs was easily understood. The police sirens and gunshots can be heard clearly.

[@metern]

If Peter Quill has a translator implant, why can't he understand Groot 😁.

[@Xboxcampking334]

Mr pink getting caught something I been telling people in my life for years 😂 yea can hear it

[@WhoTube277]

Bladerunner 2049 reinforces the ambiguity of whether Deckard is a replicant or a human. This is clear from Wallace's discussion with him if you're paying attention. The whole point is that it's never revealed. Did a replicant reproduce with a replicant? Did a human reproduce with a replicant? It all serves the theme of both movies: what does it mean to be human? The out-of-focus red-eye in the first film is subtle and happens only once raising the question of Deckard's origin. Regardless of what Scott or Ford say, they didn't write the screenplay, and Scott had nothing to do at all with the sequel (which is superior in many ways to the original). Basically, if you're not on board with never knowing whether Deckard is a replicant, you don't understand the movies.

[@djcjr1x1]

I agree about the movie's point but Deckard safely living in highly irradiated Vegas long term with his dog makes me think both were replicants.🤔

[@blueskies792]

He is clearly human in 2049.

[@WhoTube277]

@@blueskies792 Evidence?

[@blueskies792]

The Second movie. Blade Runner 2044 Deckard was a weak human (in both movies.) Racheal was built by Tyrell to create a hybrid replicant/human baby and that was Deckers immune compromised love child at the end of Blade Runner 2044. Hybrids often have genetic problems like an immune system deficiency. Wallace wanted Tyrells tech secrets because he could only make so many of his own. Deckard couldnt save himself but the replacant Officer K saved Deckards life. Officer K lived long enough to know he done a good job. A job well done.

[@WhoTube277]

@@blueskies792 You're not basing your answer on what's in the movies. You're just speculating. It is established in the films that not all replicants have super strength. There are different types for different purposes. Luv is stronger than K, for instance. You say Deckard is a "weak human," but he certainly seems stronger than Rachel, a replicant. You're trying to solve a mystery that isn't MEANT to be solved because that would ruin the point of the movies.

[@PrinceIsot]

Pretty sure you can even hear the cops order Mr Pink down before some shots are heard. He went out like a G

[@alm2187]

What was that one sci-fi? Dude gets lucky with a woman who's already into him enough that she knows little details of what he likes during sex. (She attributes her precise knowledge to simple girl talk.) Then her arm gets cut in an accident and circuitry is exposed instead of blood. He freaks out, as anyone well might if he/she/they thought a robot had duped her/him/them into sex on false pretenses. Later, the woman proves she's a human with a cybernetic prosthetic arm. So could Deckard be an ordinary man who once needed his vision corrected medically? Couldn't a human have robotic eyes implanted if medical science recommended it?

[@user-lb9xw4xf2q]

I don’t think Blade Runner had cybernetic technology, at least the Replicants weren’t robots, but artificially created and modified humans. If Deckard had robotic eyes, they would look mechanical, as opposed to organic with a weird reaction to light.

[@dragolance]

What about every time a dead person was shown in the Sixth Sense there was Red in the scene which led up to the reveal at the end? Would that count?

[@shereadsmysteries]

I don’t think so because this list is about questions that people believe were never answered in these films. Everything was answered at the end of Sixth Sense.

[@thebatman8895]

Once Rose got onto the door, Jack should have tried again. He tried once to get on, and not again. The way he pulled on the door made it sink. He could have tried to shimmy onto the door a different way and been successful in getting onto the door. Gave up too easily and it cost him his life.

[@DavidPruitt]

Door flip =/= door sink. There both holding on and is isn't sinking. They could have what switched off of it truly was the buoyancy.

[@Jagangable]

Bladerunner only makes sense if he’s a replicant and it’s the whole point of the film, it was never a debate.

[@DarianDuncn]

Titanic wasn’t about buoyancy either, check Mythbusters they proved the door could have handled two full grown men and rose isn’t that heavy

[@danielsantiagourtado3430]

Happy Easter 🎉🎉🎉🐇🐇🐇

[@eliteempire0453]

Happy Easter 🐣

[@s.a.l948]

You too

[@Donathon-qx8kq]

Same

[@spaceo8568]

Garfield's spiderman never had a problem with people knowing he was spiderman. He took his mask off every chance he got.

[@josephnichol6025]

That No Country for Old Men thing is a bit of a stretch.

[@9liveslie-cat-lie129]

And that's why he was saved in Blade Runners at the end

[@encognitusmaximus7598]

With Quill's translator does that also allow him to speak the other languages or we presume everyone has a translator? I get it translating what he hears but doesn't explain him speaking those languages back. Unless we're supposed to think/believe it also changes what he says, keeping everything we hear in English?

[@ginsugray5469]

This is something we’ve learned from Star Trek: never peer too closely at the concept of the universal translator. We just don’t do that. Because we just don’t.

[@user-lb9xw4xf2q]

I presume such an interconnected galaxy would mean that they can understand each other’s different languages (like in parts of Europe). There could also be the Star Wars excuse of there being a predominant language called Basic that everyone uses to communicate between cultures, albeit some who can’t speak it can still understand it, as too do people understand their alien language. In Doctor Who, the TARDIS has a translation circuit that makes someone be able to talk and understand languages they don’t know, yet they don’t realise it, as it just comes across as in whatever their native tongue. Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy has a funny one with a Babel fish that lives in someone’s brain; they consume external stimuli of sound then excrete in the host’s own language so they understand. Most people have the fish, so can communicate.

[@SQ_YorkshireCamping_GaSC]

Even though Ridley Scott says Deckard is a replicant, and he, in one shot, looks to have the eyes.. Replicants don't live as long as He did.

[@brianartillery]

But then again... Who does?

[@renearevalo7255]

And they can't reproduce organically, right? 🤔

[@djcjr1x1]

The latest series replicant had no set lifespan ie the need to find them in 2049.

[@blueskies792]

No, Decker is cearly human. Blade Runner 2049 clearly reinenforces the idea. Rachel was created by Tyrell to give birth to a human hybrid. That hybrid is Deckers and Racheals immune compromised love child.

[@nathangillon7294]

Mr. Pink! Finally, someone mentions this! (Though I was under the impression he was shit by the police)...

[@fuspuz8540]

Reservoir Dogs was very good.

[@kaydog2450]

deckards eyes in blade runner might have been a vfx fault thats never been fixed then again could be something thats designed to make the audience question if hes human or not but there abvanced replicants that can age and reproduce but i would say male would be human female replicant

[@zoeherriot]

The setup for the VFX in blade runner to achieve the eye glow is so deliberate, it’s unlikely that it was a mistake.

[@Shortfusefilm]

The Unicorn dream is what gives him away, it is obviously a planted memory and that's made clear from the unicorn origamis Gaff makes.

[@johnburt7935]

The origami was cut from the original release, remember.

[@johnburt7935]

Oops, sorry, I'm wrong - the origami was in the original release - it's the unicorn dream that was cut. Thus, the origami unicorn was just origami, proving that the detective had been there. With the unicorn dream included, it's proof that other people knew what Decker was dreaming.

[@Shortfusefilm]

@johnburt7935 absolutely, the dream drives it home!

[@Butcherbg]

I know this will make no sense whatsoever, but in the context of something I have previously wrote under a Wojak dedicated video, this can be perceived by me as a bait and yet I cannot not "damn you Buoyancy"... Anyways now that I've got this out of my system I have another a bit more coherent statement, or at least one semi based on realistic facts. If "the glow" is what I think I saw, I am pretty sure every actress in certain type of ~amateur videos is a replicant as well. Also while typing this obvious BS because I wanted to underline the "non professional" lightings captured in the performers eyes... I did remember that years ago "Red Eye" correction was real digital camera selling point. IDK if it became so natural cameras have it that people forgot about it... but back in the day like 80% of the people on the ~film cameras (the one with you know the chemical compound stuff that required specific shops to be ~extracted on glossed small cardboards ~or something) were apparently replicas... LoL... The World is Caught. And also just to be clear the color of the glow in ~the first scenario is different because is directly out of those round fluorescent lamps/bulbs around the camera itself. (on Behalf of BTS clips, I've never personally seen such an equipment from ~either end).

[@Resimaster]

I'm sure this very channel has pointed out the Titanic "plot hole" at least a couple of times, yet now they seem to realise they screwed up because they clarify it correctly in this video.

[@solgoode]

If you post it on the internet, it never truly dies. The thought that Electro could've seen the footage of Mysterio outing Peter as Spider-man, is valid.

[@garretthendricks6350]

Those are different universes

[@chris-ph4ko]

it flipped because they both tried to get on the same side. its been proven several times it would have worked. stop bringing this shit up

[@pugnatumterram7452]

Didn’t mythbusters already debunk the buoyancy argument?

[@All5Horizons]

The opposite. They also weren’t able to get both of them on the door unless they tied life jackets to the bottom.

[@derekstein6193]

​@@All5HorizonsLife jackets that were worn and available. Also, Jamie and Adam definitely weigh more than Jack and Rose, so not exactly a one-to-one comparison.

[@All5Horizons]

Didn’t say that it was. I was just answering their question about the episode.

[@margegarland7635]

Problem with that is.. it's possible but not very likely cause how many people would know it could be done, let alone how to do it, especially back then

[@kailmek]

@@derekstein6193 Adam and Jamie used weight-correct dummies for Jack and Rose in their final tests. And while it might well have sufficed to keep them both alive (note, not out of the water - the trial made it clear they'd still be partially submerged, and feeling the effects but not nearly the point of Jack's canon fate) James Cameron was on set the whole time. His comment? "But the script is quite clear - Jack dies." :-) So, plausible but busted by authorial fiat. And though pointed out below that they might not have known it could be done I counterpoint that in situation like that your brain isn't working nearly as clearly. it's why, for instance, militaries drill and train so much - they're basically wiring in specific response and learned instinct so that when fit does hit shan your brain processes and reacts differently than an untrained civilian.

[@davidcroucher6262]

They recreated the eye flash in Ready Player One for the scene where they trick the badguy into thinking he's been held hostage in the real world. In a film full of Easter Eggs that was the only one that actually seemed clever.

[@nicholasthomas6407]

Batman never rejected a sidekick

[@Milton2k]

11:53 No, it has been proven that it was a miscalculation from Cameron. The board/door is buoyant enough, proven several times and even accepted by Cameron.

[@AnarchyThirtySeven]

Or his eyes were replaced with artificial ones.

[@cmac6861]

Why does WC continuously refuse to acknowledge Jackie Brown?

[@cdnnorsedogdad5119]

What most people including this reviewer don't notice in "Titanic", Jack did not exist, he is a figment of Rose's Imagination. There is NO historical record of Jack's exitance. There is Historical record that show Rose exist and was on the Titanic when it sank. But NO Historical record that Jack exist. Jack is nothing but a figment of Old Rose's Imagination as she is telling her story which starts the film as she is being interviewed by James Cameron and ask to "tell you story".

[@MurderMostFowl]

Go home What Culture … you’re drunk. No matter what you think about whether Deckard is a replicant or not, (I am going to trust the screenwriter rather than the Director on this one) that scene is not intentional. It’s clear that the light they were using to illuminate Sean Young’s eyes briefly shined in Harrison Ford’s eyes when he turned his head. Besides, they literally show his eyes multiple times up close in the film. You even showed it in your clip. The test requires stress and calls for empathy. If you could just look at their eyes, they would just have caught them easily.

[@dannyayala3462]

Happy Easter second to comment

[@pyrolight7568]

If Decker was a replicant, then why was he only as strong as a human. All replicants were somewhat superhuman.

[@Unfixingalloy1UA1]

THANK YOU Ive always been so confused why people thought they could both fit on the door in Titanic. THEY TRIED AND FAILED

[@danjumasmith7122]

I could have sworn the Mexican guys got the money

[@garyv2498]

She was really a man in "The Crying Game"

[@dylanglaze990]

Jack should have found his own debri to get on there was plenty in the water. I'd have atleast tried before i allowed myself to freeze to death, i can't imagine how painful that would be. And with the t rex, is that really proof of it being sneaky or just a flaw?

[@JustNilt]

In real life, the water at the time of Titanic's sinking was about 28°F (-2°C). You've got a VERY short time to get out of water that cold before your body simply shuts down your limbs. It's a biological response to the extreme cold to attempt to maintain critical organs alive while potentially sacrificing an extremity or two. In ideal circumstances, you've got under 15 minutes before you're unconscious. If you can stay afloat, you can survive for another half hour or so and be mostly fine. While they weren't on the debris itself very long, Jack had been immersed in water for quite some time before the ship even sank. Considering the extreme amount of exertion he'd been through to even get to that point, the movie's portrayal of him succumbing very quickly to the cold is quite reasonable.

[@jamesmacker]

What happened to whatculture 😢

[@alm2187]

Hm? All of us viewers are likely to have our own plus & minus columns when watching, so your comment could be about almost anything. What specific, comparative aspects of this video are you commenting on?

[@Bowiebonolennon1982]

Are you talking about the commercials that interrupt the videos?

[@syphon_filter84]

Lolwut??? What are you talking about?

[@mingming37]

😢

[@DeaDlyCorpsE528]

They got sold to foreigners, so they can lecture americans

[@louisegrimhelm3041]

They proved on mythbusters that Rose could have tied her cork floatation vest to the door and they both could have survived

[@harryboyes2812]

The Mythbusters actually explained that it was about buoyancy in one of their shows, and Adam and Jamie proved that it was possible for both of them to have gotten on the door and survived. But James Cameron told them that Jack's death was part of the plot, and so he bit the dust.

[@jafar_snaids6047]

Oh big surprise! Another video featuring blade runner. 🤓

[@ItsJustCiCi]

Algorithm 👍🏾

[@liboud22]

The thing about Titanic is that the Jack was much safer than Rose, despite being in the water. See, the see water would have been less colder compared to the air. The average temp of the water would have been around 4 degrees C while the air would have been subzero. Hence Rose should have been subjected to hypothermia worse than Jack.

[@PeterPHasVids]

Whatculture fell off....

[@RandomTChance]

NCfOM SUCKED! 🤷‍♂️

[@Jagangable]

Bladerunner only makes sense if he’s a replicant and it’s the whole point of the film, it was never a debate.