When Black holes & Neutron Stars Collide - Brian Cox on Gravitational Waves

More than 100 years ago, Albert Einstein came up with many ideas about gravity and space. In Einstein's general theory of relativity, gravity is treated as a phenomenon resulting from the curvature of spacetime. This curvature is caused by the presence of mass. Generally, the more mass that is contained within a given volume of space, the greater the curvature of spacetime will be at the boundary of its volume.
English physicist and professor of particle physics in the School of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Manchester, Brian Cox explains the science behind gravitational waves. He mentions how every massive object that accelerates produces gravitational waves. Brian Cox also explains in layman terms how LIGO is able to detect gravitational waves caused by some of the most energetic events in the Universe-colliding black holes, merging neutron stars, exploding stars, and possibly even the birth of the Universe itself.
100 years after Einstein came up with the general theory of relativity, scientists detected gravitational waves for the first time. These first gravitational waves happened when two black holes crashed into one another.
The two blackholes that merged formed a single blackhole 62 times the mass of our sun. As they merged in about 0.2 seconds the equivalent of 3 times the mass of our Sun was lost through gravitational waves emission. In comparison our Sun has lost a mere 0.03 percent of its mass in 5 billion years through electromagnetic emission.
Many models of the Universe suggest that there was an inflationary epoch in the early history of the Universe when space expanded by a large factor in a very short amount of time. If this expansion was not symmetric in all directions, it may have emitted gravitational radiation detectable today as a gravitational wave background. This background signal is too weak for any currently operational gravitational wave detector to observe. However, LIGO is just the first step and with future instruments we could potentially pickup gravitational waves that rippled through the first moments of the Big Bang that would solve one of the greatest mysteries in physics.
#ProfBrianCox #wormhole #science
SUBSCRIBE to our channel "Science Time": / sciencetime24
SUPPORT us on Patreon: / sciencetime
BUY Science Time Merch: teespring.com/science-time-merch
Sources:
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
www.ligo.org/science/faq.php#...
Brian Cox at National Gallery Singapore
The University of Manchester - • In Conversation with P...
Brian Cox Lecture - GCSE Science brought down to Earth
The University of Manchester - • Brian Cox Lecture - GC...
LIGO Discovers Binary Black Hole Merger: 100 Years of Gravitational Waves
MIT Department of physics • LIGO Discovers Binary ...
LIGO - www.ligo.caltech.edu/page/gra...
JPL Propulsion Lab - Dropping In With Gravitational Waves
www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/teach/ac...
What Is a Gravitational Wave?
spaceplace.nasa.gov/gravitati...
Gravity
"First Second of the Big Bang". How The Universe Works 3. 2014. Discovery Science
How gravitational waves could solve some of the Universe’s deepest mysteries
www.nature.com/articles/d4158...
LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA finds elusive mergers of black holes with neutron stars
www.ligo.org/detections/NSBH2...
Inflationary Cosmology: From Theory to Observations
arxiv.org/abs/1810.09934
"Professor Brian Cox at BETT 2020" by p_a_h is licensed under CC BY 2.0

[@markfoz7248]

Funny that I’ve found this love for learning years after leaving school. Just wish my brain could compute the size of things described here. 🤯

[@nadiyahasanah2278]

I feel ya

[@jt2861]

I’ve been saying this to myself every day for the past 5 years. Why is that after I completed school/college did I suddenly begin to enjoy and love learning? Why couldn’t this passion have existed during my school years? It’s very frustrating

[@ElementUup511]

divide and multiply. find a visual rep for 100k LY then 1m LY then 100m to 1 billion. then work in 3's from there till you get to 15 billion being the cmb. or the limit telescopes can see outward. but this still is tiny compare to the theoretical size of the universe but then you can just use the earth to compared to the giant sun spot. they are both 30 fold difference in size. cbm being 15 b LY and theoretical universe being 470 b .

[@DarthJarJarBinks_]

With an instructor like Prof Cox, anyone can enjoy learning

[@Miki99432]

Great lecture. What scare me about black holes is that they can merge. We live in very weird and magical world, and most people on earth don't even realize or care.

[@CarlesMP]

I love Brian's voice. You can tell how passionate he is

[@varyokh]

indeed, now imagine how pissed he mustve been (and rightfully) when he threw papers at the guy who was denying climate change on tv show

[@teleportdinero]

@@varyokh greetings it is i

[@axeman2638]

I can tell how stupid he is

[@pettersaethre]

@@varyokh there is a climate change. the debate revolves around if its man made, and if so.. what amount. this is what most sceptics are arguing

[@jari2018]

he is passinate but noninformative and repetive thus boring and I avoid him -he has nothing to say -If i wanted to listen to a parrot I listen to a parrot

[@commonsense2108]

Really enjoy watching Brian. I was however, hoping for in-depth specifics of a collision between a black hole & neutron star...as the title lead me to believe.

[@popejose]

Also, this has about as much Brian Cox as it does depth.

[@bernieflanders8822]

All of Brian Cox's books are phenomenal! Relativity by Einstein is still an awesome book, even tho his theories are better understood now, his original brilliance to explain how the universe works before anyone else did (minkowsky aside) is still a great read and a wonderful look into the brain of a human that was not swerved or blinded by personal beliefs. Just the way things are.

[@pamwalker7823]

What more did you want to know. It’s all in there. You cannot get nitty gritty data on it if it’s not you observing it with your own equipment. Some data is unobtainable aswell so it is what it is. Enjoy 🌹

[@elrondhubbard7059]

You'd _love_ the PBS SpaceTime channel then. For a layman audience, it really does go into depth on the physics. I'm pretty sure they've got a video about this exact topic - neutron stars and black holes colliding. edit: here ya go kzbin.info/www/bejne/g57KfpWljNqhoas&ab_channel=PBSSpaceTime

[@pamwalker7823]

@@elrondhubbard7059 Thankyou Elrond I will check it out 💞🧠🏄‍♀️

[@guillaumemaurice3503]

That was very interesting. Thank you for sharing this.

[@ScienceTime24]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@alexisaac9032]

Love this guys knowledge man. He all over the place..

[@jamesrapp9778]

Brian cheers for the video mate 😎 👌

[@diagnostician001]

The Hanford observatory is not near Seattle. It's actually a few miles north of richland Washington. It's about a half-hour drive from where i live in the tri-cities area. They also have a science center located there if anyone is ever interested in visiting.

[@adymorris7347]

Mind - blown! Thanks guys xx

[@soppingclam]

Hey Brian, do you ever have a Q&A time or ponder and explain some questions people might come up with but don't quite have the skills you do?

[@JoshPennCPTSD]

No, he's a puppet. Only knows how to read from a script

[@jamestnov41945]

We can eliminate the fact that our galaxy is fine tuned for life. This was the end quote. Can the presenter please expand on this?

[@Andrew-kt3eq]

basically if there are an infinite number of universes that each have different properties then there would be universes that would have properties fine tuned for life, and naturally since we are alive we would find ourselves in such a universe and obviously not in one of the universes that are not compatible with life.

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Andrew makes excellent points here. I'll add: given the most common elements of our (known) universe... life is inevitable. HOWEVER: 'inevitable' doesn't mean 'immediate', nor 'human', nor is the scope of time it would take for life to BE created automatic nor 'short'. In alternative universes, if certain elements didn't exist, life AS WE COMPREHEND IT might not exist. However... what if life goes beyond 'what we believe'? 😊 What if the wavelengths alone (light, sound, gravitational, etc.) can or could be considered 'life'? Must give us pause.

[@corydorastube]

@@Novastar.SaberCombat You ar just a woo merchant, Stick to Star Wars.

[@frankchase9297]

Great job!

[@l0g1cseer47]

Thanks for sharing!

[@timcross2510]

There is something about Brian's voice that makes me feel like a better type of human is speaking. I'm well educated, not gay, and don't have a similar reaction to other speakers. The effect isn't so noticable here, but in other lectures, I was moved in an emotional way.

[@psytek1978]

Are you maybe british? :D

[@gautamnegi9675]

U are attracting to his voice, *U are GAY*

[@leeberry3708]

Love the videos thanks for that. So can we get into the Big Question I was watching horizon (cosmic Dawn) and I see some problems with that video. When he gets to the cube is interesting, and the starting of the cosmic Dawn can we dig into that? Will be waiting for that Video thanks again.

[@AntoZeus]

Thanks for upload, always a treat to learn something instead of wasting my time watching so called ghost/UFO footage lol love and luck from Ireland ☘❤☘❤☘

[@DarchieB]

KZbin Algorithm: Do you love learning about the cosmos from physicists presenting information in an accessible way? Well then check out all these conspiracy theories! Aliens, skin walkers, big foot, it’s all basically the same! Hold up you’ll love this Joe Rogan clip…

[@R-A-F]

@@DarchieB 😂 also Joe Rogan has turned out to be a bigger anus than Uranus 🤪

[@DarchieB]

@@R-A-F 😆😆

[@Yourefreekinbrilliant]

Super duper guy!! We are learning!

[@williamkim6275]

The thought of what was before the Big Bang, blows my mind every time. I wonder what created nothing before this massive explosion that created our current uniform. Then, when I hear about a multiverse. I complete lose my $hit. Blessed to have thinkers like Einstein, and Brian Cox to think this existential theories for us.

[@TheDaveSharman]

Brian's portrayal of 80 year old billionaire media magnate Logan Roy in the TV show 'Succession' is pure genius, didn’t know the guy could act.

[@sinebar]

Is it possible that a black hole actually becomes a very massive particle? It has mass, charge, angular momentum and it’s infinitesimally small. Kind of sounds like a particle. Perhaps a gravity made super massive particle.

[@brianpj5860]

Thats pretty much exactly what happens, and why The theory of Quantum Gravity is the new holy grail of physics. Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity are the 2 best descriptors of the universe, but unfortunately dont work together. But a black hole is where both GR and QM become relative, and that breaks the maths. Honestly I dont believe in an infinite density, and there has to be some sort of exotic remnant matter inside, but what form that matter takes is anyones guess.

[@sinebar]

@@brianpj5860 Makes me wonder if a black hole or "GMSMP is quantum in nature. Would it have a particle/wave duality?

[@nuntana2]

TL;DR No, not a particle. No dimension. Representation of energy at its purest.

[@CinnamonTroll246]

@@brianpj5860 "big crunch/big bang"-theory sounds the most likely, sooner or later all matter in the entire universe would have been attracted into a black hole, then ONE black hole "big crunch", when that happens the black hole will explode "big bang", i think black holes is a temporary vaccum, hugry ,but not infinite,.,

[@leannetompkins6858]

Wow, wow, Wowsaaaa 😁 Holla!!!! Thank you! Bring me More!!!

[@ScienceTime24]

More to come!

[@TheLastStarfighter77]

Just imagine if a type 3 or 4 civilisation could harness this enormous amount of energy, they could literally create or destroy a galaxy, perhaps to much Star Wars, however the thought is mind provocative.

[@varyokh]

is it possible to have max tegmark, neil degrasse tyson, brian cox, brian greene, michio kaku, jenna levigne all at the same room ???

[@TraumaER]

A black hole would occur. 🕳

[@ahmetakgun7709]

You left Alan Guth out. The guy who calculated the Big in the Big Bang.

[@varyokh]

@@ahmetakgun7709 yes correct

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Organize it.

[@philcoombes2538]

think the IQpressure would break all of the windows, myself...

[@michaelevanrichman]

You forgot to cite the full lines lifted from here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave

[@Wilky971]

Since gravitational waves can't be stopped by anything it can make us to understand part of the universe before de photon Era that's it ?

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Precisely. But... since humans cannot detect certain wavelengths (sound, light, gravitational, etc.), they cannot comprehend everything. However, *"just because you do not see something doesn't mean it isn't there".* --Starshaa 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ "Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart & soul's fate revealed. In Time, all points converge--hope's strength re-steeled. But to earn final peace at the Universe's endless refrain, We must see all in nothingness... ...before we start again." 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ -- Diamond Dragons (book 1)

[@rejebeek2926]

I love Brian

[@hawkkim1974]

I don't understand this. So basically space/time is shaking due to an impact of two massive black holes colliding. Intuitively object in the shaking space/time should must be shaking along the space/time as well. Then do we detect what and how with those two lasers?

[@JoshPennCPTSD]

You're not supposed to understand this, like everyone, just virtue signal and act cool. He gives us a load of hog wash

[@amalieemmynoether992]

Wondering if JWT will be able see the earliest stars and galaxies.

[@LouDeeCruz]

It will see more stars and galaxies. But they will be mature galaxies. Impossible under Big Bang theory.

[@DanielVerberne]

1:30 - haha, someone making this video likes using Space Engine! I love it too, it's just a terrific bit of software (made seemingly by one Russian person, amazingly!). While I'm sure it's not of the class that actual astronomers or cosmologists would require in terms of accuracy, the fact that it does apparently represent some 100,000+ actual catalogued stellar and other objects is very impressive. Of course, I bought the high-definition planet textures for oure solar system planets too, but even with procedurally-generated planetary, asteroidal or moon surfaces, it can look great. Nothing in this world showed the scale of space and the sheer emptiness like virtually 'flying' around in Space Engine. Folks, Space Engine is a space 'simulator' for PC and maybe other platforms, available via Steam. Also supports some virtual-reality helmets, which apparently makes it a near-religious experience.

[@kristrigos]

Unfortunately I cannot hear Brians voice. I am at work and I have my break. At least there are subtitles...

[@roddychristodoulou9111]

I love Brian he's one of my heroes , I just wish he loses his permasmile as I can't tell when he's deadly serious .

[@n1k32h]

Earth is flat actually

[@czslendy9646]

.. interesting 👍🙂...

[@Sina-sd6qp]

What should a regular person do with this information?

[@pepedeltoro6647]

Given how large the universe is, shouldn't earth be bombarded by gravitational waves from many events at the same time all the time? How do you pinpoint where the gravitational waves come from? Can gravitational waves from one event merge with waves from another event?

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Yes. No, humans can't pinpoint all. Yes.

[@nuntana2]

They are very small. It’s not like a tsunami.

[@JuanCruz-ef5os]

"in multiverse, the laws of nature could be different in every one." if that's the case, then those that are different from ours, would have a different theory (not big bang) of how the universe started. am i right?

[@corydorastube]

No I don't think so.

[@jeffreymackay4343]

@@corydorastube support your answer. Why don't you think so?

[@corydorastube]

@@jeffreymackay4343 I don't know why I think so. I can no more support my answer than you can yours.

[@Dreamdancer11]

Dont think so much about it.....not even astronomers know shit...they just invent new stuff out of their asses for the math to fit.Dark matter,dark energy,the great attractor blah blah fucking blah.... Their logic is that they want to cram everything to their standard model and are willing to invent stuff for it to work instead of admitting that their models are crap and start with new concepts.....

[@quantumofspace1367]

Here is a new experiment for you, with wave curvatures of space-time, that is, with gravitational-wave oscillations, which can exceed noise and interference. For balance in movement, two equal angular optical horoscopes are used, installed oppositely, on a special platform made of a mechanical gyroscope, which optical gyroscopes move around each other, without angular velocity, with amplitudes of 50,000 pieces, loads on the optical paths of one loop, gyroscopes from; 1.3 G to 3.5 G and above,

[@blank_stare_productions]

I've lived in Washington state for a decade and I didn't know that half of LIGO was here. #feelinstupid

[@HueghMungus]

Do you even know about SIGMA? How about LIGMA?

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

@James... are you a scientist? I mean... why WOULD you know? 😊

[@corydorastube]

@@Novastar.SaberCombat I knew and I am just a lowly janitor in England.

[@matthew2182]

I doubt there are radically different laws in the inflationary multiverse. Its a cyclical star and planet factory out there. The best comparable example of the motions it's possibly making exist in water caustics as matter "washes" around. As the point of a wave peaks it returns that energy as a smaller big bang event until the remaining matter is eventually inert. Blackholes become the dominant force in the 'frozen' areas until they start slowly collecting into a single blackhole. From there it evaporates and goes somewhere else or the blackhole explodes with the force of the entirety of it's mass causing a proper 'Big Bang' event.

[@axle.student]

0:11 The universe expands and cools.. So where did all of that energy go? What absorbed that heat?

[@nuntana2]

The continued expansion is what ‘absorbed’ the heat but all energy is still there.

[@Narukosaki]

Hanford is closer to Richland Washington than Seattle

[@piratekingndoe6772]

theoretically if we dont know the point of expansion we could be far to far away to see the first stars clearly

[@andyhawley6395]

Do Gravitational Waves effect the expansion of space?

[@C21H30O2]

Mmmm love me some Brian Cox....

[@mungohalf-brain2743]

If there were multiple universes would they be able to influence each other? Could you see in the CMB (for example) the gravitational ghost of an outside universe orbiting our own?

[@axeman2638]

there cannot be multiple universes, a universe by definition is singular. Look at the word, it starts with UNI, there can only be one.

[@axeman2638]

@@Braun09tv did you ever consider the possibility that a theory that resorts to speculative untestable nonsense and requires the invention of huge masses of substances never observed to make it work might be fundamentally broken and/or be built on some questionable assumptions? It's electric, you know it makes sense, unlike standard model cosmology. It also explains observations better without the need to resort to dark matter and multiple universes.

[@axeman2638]

@@Braun09tv then it's not science.

[@axeman2638]

@@Braun09tv no, first comes observation of what is.

[@axeman2638]

@@Braun09tv call me when you find some dark matter kid.

[@flappingarms9335]

Anyone know at what speed these gravitational waves travel?

[@VantaBlackSheep]

Speed of light

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Possibly faster. This would also explain why we cannot detect certain wavelengths, but yet... we 'know' certain things MUST exist. *"Just because you do not see something doesn't mean it isn't there."* --Starshaa Wavelengths, resonance, vibrations, radiation, frequencies and flow... these all lead to the ultimate destination: Reflection. ✨✨✨ 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ "Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart & soul's fate revealed. In Time, all points converge--hope's strength re-steeled. But to earn final peace at the Universe's endless refrain, We must see all in nothingness... ...before we start again." 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ -- Diamond Dragons (book 1)

[@corydorastube]

@@Novastar.SaberCombat In the standard theory (general relativity) gravitational waves travel at exactly the vacuum speed of light. There are alternate theories to be sure, for instance bimetric theories in which the speed of gravitational waves is different (sometimes quite different) as gravitational waves obey rules unlike the rules for all other forms of matter or radiation. But now, there is the apparent detection of a gamma ray burst (GRB) within less than a half second of the GW150914 gravitational wave event detected by LIGO. If it is confirmed that this GRB was due, in fact, to the same source, or if in the case of a future gravitational wave event, we could unambiguously relate the event to a source visible in gamma rays, that will definitively settle the question by showing that gravitational waves indeed travel at the same speed as light in a vacuum. For now, I think most physicists would be extremely surprised if it turned out that gravitational waves traveled at some speed other than c.

[@antonbianco1169]

@@Novastar.SaberCombat they have only set up one range of detection of the most common ones. they are altering the next ones to detect others and more types.

[@frankcrawford416]

These neutron stars got nothing on a black hole but definitely cool to talk about. Black holes are so boring.

[@hdgehog6]

In the beginning there were so many massive stars that did not make it to starhood - collapsing into themselves before becoming radiant..... but, don't get me started 'cause space/time does not exist!

[@skinnyway]

person being interviewed says "big bang, big bang, big bang" so many times I am just laughing hysterically on the inside - on the outside i am simply shaking my head.

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

That's Brian Cox. Are you... someone of import or credibility in the realm of science? Do tell. Also, this video is edited. It contains specific, non-contiguous moments of answers and suggestions Brian Cox stated. Finally, the 'Big Bang' theory isn't merely a TV show, it's a long-heralded postulation which needs a lot more clarification (and/or debunking).

[@corydorastube]

@@Novastar.SaberCombat Have a look at the cr@p on her playlists.

[@Graeme_Lastname]

Universe fine tuned for life is silly. Life is fine tuned for the universe. Which came first?

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Life is inevitable, given the three most common elements detected throughout the galaxy. However... just because something is 'inevitable' doesn't mean the length of TIME in order to realize that inevitability is 'soon' or short or 'in humanity's scope'. One day, the Earth WILL be consumed by the Sun. Independently of any life, technology or alternate celestial event... ...but it's going to take BIIIIIILLLOONSSSS of years. 💪😁🤟

[@corydorastube]

@@Novastar.SaberCombat ...but it's going to take BIIIIIILLLOONSSSS of years. 💪😁🤟. About 5.

[@alexwalker1849]

The Michelson & Morley test proves earth is non rotating.

[@philshorten3221]

Big Burp theory😊 Is it possible our observable universe is just the size of a pea compared to a beach ball sized black hole, and, that what we see as the "big bang" was just the moment of ignition of a jet from that really really big black holes Event Horizon? Forming a jet from such a really big black hole (many millions of times the mass of the entire visible universe) would be an extremely energetic event. So would being launched from the Event Horizon create a region of space much younger than the rest of the universe? Such a massive black holes would presumably have be very much older than 13.8 billion years?

[@TheBaconbush]

So if there was nothing in the very beginning, how did that nothing go bang? Serious question

[@falten2]

That's the million dollar question. Or maybe we are wrong in stating there was nothing to begin with. Maybe there was something that evolved into more. Either way. I'm pretty sure there is a Nobel prize waiting for someone able to crack those propositions. Or, it simply can't/wont be answered and then we will have to suffice with never knowing. In science it's okay to say i/we don't know

[@R-A-F]

I would ask god that very same question, if he existed, right after I asked him who created him 🥴 Man created him 🤫

[@corydorastube]

@@falten2 I would say that there never was "nothing",I don't think "nothing" can exist. There has always been energy. Energy cannot be created or destroyed but it can be converted into matter and matter can be converted into energy.

[@falten2]

@@corydorastube I could subscribe to that theory

[@corydorastube]

@@falten2 I would not call it a theory since I cannot think of any predictions it makes. The problem with nothing is that to describe it one must assign properties to it. Something with properties cannot be nothing in my way of thinking.

[@Ender7j]

Too bad most of my fellow Americans will not be able to understand what he said about fine-tuning and why that’s so impactful.

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Learning is a slow process. Especially for humans. Reflection is a critical key to understanding what lies 'beyond the veil'... and, collectively, humans do not excel at this. 🌊🌊🌊 Wavelengths, resonance, vibrations, radiation, frequencies and flow... these all lead to the ultimate destination: Reflection. ✨✨✨ 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ "Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart & soul's fate revealed. In Time, all points converge--hope's strength re-steeled. But to earn final peace at the Universe's endless refrain, We must see all in nothingness... ...before we start again." 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ -- Diamond Dragons (book 1)

[@Ender7j]

@@DrDeuteron I’ll spell it out for you. Most of my fellow Americans are very religious. Part of that belief system is the idea that our reality was purposefully fine-tuned for human habitation. If it isn’t fine-tuned, they have a harder time converting people or defending their beliefs from criticism. The reason this is important is because these same deluded people try to legislate based on their faulty Bronze Age ideals. That doesn’t seem pretentious, just an observation.

[@mariaearthangel7251]

Who created matter and stars? 🌟

[@Censeo]

Stars caused most of the elements, meaning Stars caused things we are familiar with on earth

[@emjem99]

Presumably you have a theory given your use of "who". Please enlighten us.

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Wavelengths, resonance, vibrations, radiation, frequencies and flow... these all lead to the ultimate destination: Reflection. ✨✨✨ 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ "Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart & soul's fate revealed. In Time, all points converge--hope's strength re-steeled. But to earn final peace at the Universe's endless refrain, We must see all in nothingness... ...before we start again." 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ -- Diamond Dragons (book 1)

[@linkeron1]

There wasn't a who involved!

[@corydorastube]

Matter cannot be created. Matter is "frozen" energy. Energy can neither be created or destroyed. Your question is malformed. It would be better if one asked "What created matter and the starts" asking who is question begging. Gravity creates stars.

[@AdmiralDave]

I only clicked on this thumbnail because it looked like the guy was making a Rasengan

[@leeberry3708]

So where do stars form? Galaxies. Where did all those blacksphere's form in the center of the Galaxies? In a really big Galaxie. Where did that Galaxy come from ? The First Star Ever. How big was that Star ? It was unimaginably Big. Could that Star have been the singularity that always gets talked about? Maybe it was hot really tiny in comparison to the universe and their was only 1. Is everything we see from that first singularity or Star? Yes , Maybe , I don't know for sure? Is the CMB a remnant of that First Star? Yes, No ? Does a singularity have to be the smallest point imaginable? Or can it simply be a single point in Space like the first Star Ever? Hmmm.

[@redreuben5260]

Who thinks Brian Cox should be the next Dr Who ?

[@wakawaka97100]

NOW MORE THAN EVER, I WANT BEATTLEJUICE TO GO OFF

[@dfsw]

Yeah that's good but what would happen if a sun like ours made of lava collided with a sun made of water?

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Fire & ice (and collisions) occur all the time. That's pretty much the entire composition of the universe, anyway.

[@thelionsam]

The closing comment is a bit disingenuous and tacked on but its an interesting model 👏🏻 👍

[@vickielizaq4664]

Can you write your email in the description? I can't read your email, thank you

[@kieronjohn6334]

Chuck Norris when he pots the black ball on the pool table

[@crystalskiss199]

Yeah I like it

[@HomelessHomeowner617]

The true sound of death metal

[@pistitoth1363]

Ok!

[@basukisugito3275]

There is gravity waves when I fall and my head hit the floor

[@Shearlogistics1]

So these two....two stars can cluster beside each other and space doesn't create a black hole. I knew black holes didn't exist.

[@balaramkushwaha8070]

Thanks

[@tinatinlomsadze6452]

❤️

[@MrDominos106]

When you used the black hole why did it have to be a binary system you didn't say anything about the unstable star lol

[@teleportdinero]

Greetings my name is grand master teleportdinero

[@timemechanicone]

Fortunately for all you are scientists we worked out our true origins, fusion & a whole lot more #Instagram

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Black holes attract in and 'recycle' 'old' wavelengths. White holes propel out 'repurposed', 'new' wavelengths. Reflection is key to understanding what lies 'beyond the veil'... 🌊🌊🌊 Wavelengths, resonance, vibrations, radiation, frequencies and flow... these all lead to the ultimate destination: Reflection. ✨✨✨ 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ "Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart & soul's fate revealed. In Time, all points converge--hope's strength re-steeled. But to earn final peace at the Universe's endless refrain, We must see all in nothingness... ...before we start again." 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ -- Diamond Dragons (book 1)

[@lindasapiecha2515]

👍😊

[@kapikoyli]

😎😎😎🙄🙄🙄

[@user-hi5rn4db4k]

🤣🤣🤣

[@frankcrawford416]

I dont think there is a multiverse nor life anywhere else than earth. There is not a single plant, seed, germ, nor any living thing on any other planet anywhere. Earth is truly one of one. Thats why it is special, special to us, special from God to us. It is special. It is so special to us from God he decided he could make infinitely more planets not like us.

[@linkeron1]

Sorry mate but, there is no God!

[@corydorastube]

I have a question for you. If some life form came to visit us from some other star system and could demonstrate, to your satisfaction that there was no God or that there is indeed a god but not the one that you or any other human being on earth worships what difference would that make to your life?

[@corydorastube]

@@linkeron1 You my fellow atheist have now just made a claim. Shoulder your burden of proof and demonstrate your claim to be true.

[@philcoombes2538]

@@corydorastube or that Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha & the Hindu Pantheon were all emissaries from them trying (unsuccessfully) to get us humans to stop killing each other, only to find us using belief in them as further excuses to carry on doing so...

[@niteshwani9290]

First one

[@danielwebster5748]

That theory is betond controversial its wrong. For 5hat to be true supermassive black holes would not exist in the early universe.. i think the supermassive black holes came 1st feom collapsing gas. Galaxies were built around the black holes

[@mainemade300]

What is the greatest question? Is there life after death ? Is ther god?are we alone ? Is this all real ? Why are we here ?

[@antonbianco1169]

Multiverse like its a fact? Fair dinkum what happened to Science where something should be somewhat proven ?

[@vyperr3]

Scientists love slipping in their theories like an infinite number of universes. It's unprovable by its definition.

[@captainzappbrannagan]

Math and physics suggests a multiverse. A trillion times better than sky daddy did it. We are making sound hypothesis no magic required.

[@Novastar.SaberCombat]

Science, by its very definition, is about the 'best, most logical postulations based upon known data'. Even Einstein 'was mistaken' in some regards, because... the 'known data' of the Time was limited. Just like Pluto being *misidentified* as a planet, long ago: it never WAS. Mistakes were made... and they were reflected and refracted again and again over time. Wavelengths of mistakes. 🌊🌊🌊 Humankind also gets some things correct. Religion was not one of them, however. 😎

[@linkeron1]

@@DrDeuteron he already has

[@alokranjan2814]

Not Mr Bran but second narrator black whole suck our solar system gentleman you are narrating about the cars super genius. Thankyou for fraudulent.

[@frankcrawford416]

How far is 1.3 billion lightyears. Just kidding

[@Wavelover33]

You know when it’s a crappy video when there’s annoying music in it

[@NS-un3pg]

You're all being deceived 😁

[@oziecowdroy-ling857]

What the angel of light did with chaos

[@CinnamonTroll246]

i think its a sexual/romantic thing

[@coolguy1127]

Isn’t it a coincidence that the smartest minds on Earth all relatively agree that the universe on its own created us and not some imaginary being.

[@ThomasSmith-os4zc]

I don't believe in black holes or neutron stars. Total make believe.

[@gkelly34]

It’s all fascinating until we get to the multiverse theory. It seems to be a bit of a convenient fit.

[@corydorastube]

I conviently fits the mathematics.

[@gkelly34]

@@corydorastube of course it does when the theory has added numbers and assumptions so it fits the data. I think it’s a bit more to do with disproving the creation myth. I’m sure it will be one day but our next Einstein or an enhanced LIGO, but not by this theory

[@srb20012001]

Multiverse: the catch-all for refuting Intelligent Design and God. Trouble is, it's pure speculation without evidence.

[@blake4twenty]

One could easily say the same about Intelligent Design and God. Two sides of the same coin, both unprovable by current scientific standards.

[@srb20012001]

@@blake4twenty True and point taken. But I'm saying it's disingenuous to speculate Multiverse, being unscientific as you say, in a scientific discussion, regardless of theological argument on origins.

[@shean7890]

Not that good of a video and the title is deceptively bothersome

[@roger_isaksson]

Wow, the drama. All baseless conjecture from the domain of imagination.

[@ujjwalbhattarai8670]

Sorry universe is not expanding. Big bang had happen in dark infinity universe. Universe was before big bang. Universe have no beginning and end.

[@elmolewis9123]

What a sad little troll.

[@ujjwalbhattarai8670]

@@elmolewis9123 big bang and universe expanding is sad big lavel of wrong concept imagination wrong troll.

[@jharv300]

We can physically see it expanding, there is no denial, the question is at what exact rate it is expanding, there are slight differences in measurement.

[@oteleaionutbogdan5381]

Universe is expanding. It’s one of the most basic concepts since we can see the redshift of distant galaxies.

[@ujjwalbhattarai8670]

@@jharv300 just universe is not expanding In universe many thing are creating. Universe is empty dark and full of time. In empty place galaxy like things are creating. When something is creating it seem like universe is expanding but not. Universe is infinity empty and dark place it's neither expand nor contract. It need mind understand.

[@jasonjones7264]

Could it be possible that gravitational waves travelling Towards each other and merge to create the stretching of space time hence why all galaxies are moving away from each other?

[@jharv300]

The gravitational waves we can detect are the equivalent to half the size of an proton, so very small, so no I don't think so.