Download Kingdom Maker on iOS & Android and start ruling today: pixly.go2cloud.org/SH3It
@arcan7622 жыл бұрын
we respect the hussle
@dmechanicodude39602 жыл бұрын
Given everything that has happened over the years, why hasn’t the uk ripped the band aid off and went for more federalization of the country. Given the divisions and bicameral legislature it might be a good idea
@justlisten822 жыл бұрын
We need to be able to simply click on the screen when a QR code shows up when using your phone to activate it. Or can we I just don't know how?
@TimEd.o7o72 жыл бұрын
same, link doesn't work for me.
@asimpnamedslickback37232 жыл бұрын
Honestly it’s actually not that bad
@alexandergangaware4292 жыл бұрын
Parliament: Treason is an offence against the country, not the King, and treason is bad. Also Parliament: Literally collaborates in a foreign invasion
@lioraselby53282 жыл бұрын
Eh it was less of a foreign invasion and more of just getting Dutch troops to take Parliament’s side in a civil war.
@richardarriaga62712 жыл бұрын
It's only treason if you lose
@LtZetarn2 жыл бұрын
@@lioraselby5328 and many royal family of many europe kingdoms is just like uncle, grandsons or distance relative to each other.
@FateDarkess2 жыл бұрын
@@LtZetarn yep
@williamparis5002 жыл бұрын
Literally from Parliament's website: "the Dutch ruler William of Orange landed at Brixham with an invasion force on 5 November 1688". That is very much the definition of a foreign invasion regardless of purpose.
@pieceofschmidtgamer2 жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: The British Monarchy still holds a surprising amount of power, however, it's not exercised by Elizabeth II because she, rightly, believes if she did so it would lead to the abolishment of the monarchy.
@CharlieZColt2 жыл бұрын
Here’s what I’m trying to understand. Americans seem to always frame the American Revolution as a fight against a tyrannical king in King George III. But wasn’t England basically 100% a democracy (for men at least) since the 1689 Bill of Rights?
@mharley37912 жыл бұрын
@@CharlieZColt this question has multiple layers to it. The top layer ( the stuff taught in US history classes) is that the bill of rights of 1689 only extended to the vote to people who owned land, and did not extend to Britain’s colonies. So the king and parliament were able to raise taxes on the colonist with out their representation (which is why “no taxation without representation” os a famous slogan in the US) A deeper layer is that there were a ton of other ideological differences between the colonies and the UK. The colonies wanted to expand west, despite treaties with Native Americans and the UK forbade it. The UK was also in the process of ending the slave trade/abolishing slavery in the UK, something that angered the southerners
@sovietunion76432 жыл бұрын
@@CharlieZColt ehh, it was only a democracy for those who had land, or very highly educated, and a few other exceptions. otherwise not really. like just over 2% of the white male population in britian could vote in 1770s, which considering how much of the population was under-literate and lacked understanding of noble politics its unlikely they would be able to make a educated response anyway america was very unique in having such a high literacy rate plus being so spread out with a lot of land to spread out with that democracy worked relatively well, especially with the method in america, where states today are still semi-autonomous even after several waves of centralization over the years
@pieceofschmidtgamer2 жыл бұрын
@@mharley3791 *The colonies wanted to expand west, despite treaties with Native Americans and the UK forbade it.* In reality, the only reason why Britain forbade it was because it helped to lower the cost of defending the colonies by minimizing the number of forts needed to cover the Trans-Mississippian West. Basically the British couldn't stop the colonists from moving west (and they knew it), but if they did move West past the line they would be outside Royal Protection. Essentially, the British didn't give a damn about the Natives any more than the colonists did. Basically, during this period the British operated in regards to the Thirteen Colonies with three motivations: Cut Costs, Raise Revenue, and Punish any Intransigence from the Colonists.
@dantelenister35032 жыл бұрын
Actually The queen is still the most powerful person in GB, because government doesn't have the power. Money dose.
@zhuljinjager4022 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised there's not many comments about Ireland and Northern Ireland actually being seperate now, I thought for sure when I saw the graphic at the end and heard "UK we all know and love"
@richardarriaga62712 жыл бұрын
IRA bombed the British into their place after famine, cultural genocide, and serfdom were imposed on Ireland. Though with Brexit, Cromwell's legacy may be undone if both sides decide to reunify in the coming decades due to the added stress of Brexit on trade in Northern Ireland. Ironic, since Brexit was an attempt to create the "UK we all know and love" even though it was more powerful under the EU.
@tbotalpha81332 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I can't tell if they were just playing up the British caricature of thoughtless self-centredness. Or if they genuinely forgot/didn't care about the bitter rebellions of the Irish against English rule.
@CosmicFreedoms2 жыл бұрын
it was a picture of the UK in the 1800's so its accurate and Sidequest is a british stereotype who of course loves the UK when it was at its height
@sir_vix2 жыл бұрын
Yeah the fact that Cromwell's new model army was responsible for a native population decline of between 15% and 50% (older estimates go as high as 83%), amongst the many policies of ethnic cleansing enacted by the parliamentarians, you'd think it would be worth inserting an ironic pause at very least...
@ThinWhiteAxe2 жыл бұрын
I think it was a deliberate joke
@exallted2 жыл бұрын
Glad to see SideQuest is getting sponsors, can’t wait to see you at one million subscribers!
@thegoldengamer93152 жыл бұрын
Fr
@PugkinSoup2 жыл бұрын
He’s shot up a lot, which is good, he deserves it
@arcan7622 жыл бұрын
To the moon!
@all_time_Jelly_Fish2 жыл бұрын
if the sponsor money allows for more frequent updates, it'll be the best thing that ever happened to SQ
@MySqueezingArm2 жыл бұрын
|redacted|
@ANDROLOMA2 жыл бұрын
"Politics is the gentle art of getting votes from the poor and campaign funds from the rich, by promising to protect each from the other." -Oscar Ameringer
@scpdatabase9692 жыл бұрын
It’s fascinating how an icon of actual power has become a pop icon instead. I wonder which force to be reckoned with today will be looked back on like the English monarchy today
@sirnikkel67462 жыл бұрын
I bet its Parliament.
@twomp56132 жыл бұрын
@@sirnikkel6746 man we really will be ruled by wealthy cyborg elites in the future won’t we. 😩
@jaromir_kovar2 жыл бұрын
Maybe the parliament itself being driven by the wants and needs of corporations?
@Ren_out_of_Ten2 жыл бұрын
The United States Oh wait, we’re already there
@sirnikkel67462 жыл бұрын
@@Ren_out_of_Ten China, Russia and the entirety of Latinamerica: *YES, JUST WEAKEN A LITTLE MORE...*
@Hollows19972 жыл бұрын
To clear up some confusion in this video: James II was the son of Charles I not Charles II as many have pointed out, James II became King because Charles II had no legitimate children.
@brendansunra2 жыл бұрын
My understanding is that James II's unpopularity was partly due to his Catholicism, whereas his daughters Mary and Anne were Protestant.
@Hollows19972 жыл бұрын
@@brendansunra correct. That’s why his daughter Anne was co-monarch alongside her husband William of Orange.
@No-hd4cg Жыл бұрын
@@Hollows1997 William III co-reigned with Mary not Anne.
@iangard9354 Жыл бұрын
The primary reason James II was deposed was more due to the fact that he was Catholic. Also I kinda find it weird you just completely skipped Charles II and the restoration of the monarchy.
@Boosher_ Жыл бұрын
kind of weird tbh
@yagamienjoyer440810 ай бұрын
i noticed that as well
@shadows_assassin31318 ай бұрын
I loved the people and the people loved me, so much that they restored the british monachy!
@freneticness69278 ай бұрын
Catholic and had an heir. No heir and it would have been fine.
@binder9468 ай бұрын
This is inaccurate and provides false facts. Monarch is the most powerful office. Even above supreme Court. Parliament is just a rubber stamp and pm can be removed by the crown but not the other way around. Propaganda piece tbh.
@Oodelally2 жыл бұрын
The Second Barons war was actually caused by the taxes imposed by Henry III to raise funds for the Pope’s war against Sicily - which would give the title to his son, Edmund - as well as the favouritism he gave to the Lusingans and the Savoyards (the Lusingans were even above the law at one point). It was actually Simon de Montfort and later Edward I who instituted the House of Lords.
@harryblischke19132 жыл бұрын
I loved Saturday morning cartoons as a kid and I still love them as a middle-aged man. Thank you SideQuest for your EXCELLENT content, even the advert.
@jdhed.mcpack69472 жыл бұрын
I remember visiting this channel for the first time, it only had 32k subs a couple of months ago, but now it's ten times that, they've finally got the attention they deserve
@JatPhenshllem2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I remember when the subs used to grow by 10k or so every few hours, that sure is what you call peak period
@jonathanbowers89642 жыл бұрын
The kings of Britain lost all power forever when Elizabeth II took the throne and declared she would reign forever. Our immortal queen will make sure that another king will not sit on the throne of Great Britain ever again. Long live the Queen.
@jonathanwebster70912 жыл бұрын
I think the irony of changing the Line of Succession from semi-salic (women can succeed, but only if they have no brothers), to absolute primogeniture (eldest child of the monarch can succeed no matter their gender)in Britain, while I am of course, totally in favour of it, is that literally everybody in the direct line of succession is male. So, no matter what happens (barring the highly unlikely event Britain becomes a republic in the future, or an unlikely series of deaths), we'll end up with Kings reigning over Britain for pretty much the next 150 years. This is equally true for Denmark and Luxembourg, who have both changed the law of succession to be gender-neutral, yet all those in the direct line of succession are all male.
@EmyrDerfel2 жыл бұрын
Don't threaten me with a good time.
@sovietunion76432 жыл бұрын
so this is where the plot of "alice in wonderland" comes from, its actually a documentary
@Hurmeri2 жыл бұрын
God save (us from) the Queen!
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
It is the 41st Millenium, and the Goddess Empress of Mankind sits upon her Golden Throne...
@Norsilca2 жыл бұрын
I've read a lot about this but I still didn't know about things like the Provisions of Oxford. Nice video.
@f89jgb72 жыл бұрын
Same, it's a TIL moment for me too just now 💯
@mokinsen2 жыл бұрын
I have a new video idea: "That time, when a Swedish company had a monopoly over the German match-market" After WW1 Germany was completely out of money and a Swedish match making company offered a deal for some money, if they could have the monopoly over the entire German match-market. With the "Zündwarenmonopolgesetz" (lighting ware monopoly act) that Swedish company controlled the German match-market from the 20's to the 80's
@aaronjust58622 жыл бұрын
Yes!
@lucaswebdev2 жыл бұрын
non english native here, what's the match market ?
@mokinsen2 жыл бұрын
@@lucaswebdev A match is a little piece of wood and if you strike it on a rough surface it ignites (fire is then on it) and you can use that to light other things, like candles or fireplaces. The Match Market is the market for said matches
@lucaswebdev2 жыл бұрын
@@mokinsen oh ok thanks alot, i had forgotten it was called that way
@DarthFhenix552 жыл бұрын
@Sabizos It is an easy word, it's just like writing reallyeasywordingerman.
@steezymeez86382 жыл бұрын
I recently found this channel. I’ve always been a history buff, but I learn about everything I was never taught in school on this channel. Well done! You earned another subscriber!
@Mario-hu5rq2 жыл бұрын
Crazy how fast this channel is growing, I remember subscribing at 10k.
@fireproximity42252 жыл бұрын
Same here, I was initially stunned to see how few subscribers they had considering the great video quality. Now I'm happily surprised to see the channel doing well
@romigithepope2 жыл бұрын
@@fireproximity4225 Me too. These are top notch videos.
@blink182bfsftw2 жыл бұрын
Yeah I subbed at 1k and thought he was stealing videos from a bigger channel bc I couldn't believe a channel with this production would be that tiny
@ALELisMe2 жыл бұрын
Man I really love this channel. I swear I see it coming 1-2 years from now you will have at least 1,2 million subs and still be making this kind of videos hopefully. Really enjoy:)
@PugkinSoup2 жыл бұрын
While it hasn’t started yet I’m absolutely positive this will be yet another good video of sidequest
@bahrom942 Жыл бұрын
Hey dude you seem comment afore watchin' video, watch till end then comment 😎😎
@PugkinSoup Жыл бұрын
@@bahrom942 way to necro an old comment that was just mean to complement the channel
@dylanking69602 жыл бұрын
If German bombs knocked out the electricity at Buckingham, would that count as the king losing his power? Edit: Buckingham, not Buckminster
@sstff67712 жыл бұрын
👌😂😂
@bunwat2232 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@jonasdavies18062 жыл бұрын
When HM Queen Elizabeth was Queen, why dont we use to call that palace bucqueenham?
@MonsieurDean2 жыл бұрын
1:59 Ha, I see what you did there. 😂
@PakBallandSami2 жыл бұрын
lol mr z got the joke
@jaidengabriel16752 жыл бұрын
"My name is Chri-"
@Blackadderthefourth2 жыл бұрын
I look forward to SideQuest hitting 1 million subs, the deserve it for this content.
@bigdee8682 жыл бұрын
I love the Chris Hansen cameo. I couldn't stop laughing. It's the little things like that I love about these videos.
@RaKaNiShU1172 жыл бұрын
This channel is brilliant at shining a light on so many lesser-known facts!!!
@hotmechanic2222 жыл бұрын
England has had 7 Queens not 6, Jane, Mary , Elizabeth , Mary , Anne , Victoria , Elizabeth. Or 8 if you include Matilda (although not generally classed as queen)
@barneyh70142 жыл бұрын
Does Jane really count though ? Edward’s will wasn’t approved by parliament so you could argue she wasn’t the legitimate queen.
@barneyh70142 жыл бұрын
I’d probably be inclined to include her though.
@christopherboyle24032 жыл бұрын
Freddie Mercury?
@trooololol2 жыл бұрын
Why are there 2 Mary? There's only one. Are you thinking of Mary queen of scots? She was never queen of England
@hotmechanic2222 жыл бұрын
@@trooololol Mary the 2nd was the eldest daughter of James the 2nd , she ruled jointly with her husband William from 1689 to 1694, Queen Anne was her younger sister
@Alec01242 жыл бұрын
A wonderful platform you have created. Keep up the good work kind sir!
@saxtonhalegaming2 жыл бұрын
4:50 Parliament: "Charles I committed treason against England, therefore he must be executed!" Also Parliament: *Organizes a literal invasion against England*
@AhmedFathy-lt6wl2 жыл бұрын
Your content is very interesting and well made, and the narrator's posh accent is the cherry on top 👌 I'm glad this channel is slowly getting more recognition. Hope the best to you!
@SolracCAP2 жыл бұрын
Happy to see this channel getting the attention it deserves!
@gavindoyle6922 жыл бұрын
“ … to form the United Kingdom that we all know and love.” Ireland: “Eh, hold my Guinness.”
@aznluvr72 жыл бұрын
O'Doyle rules!
@hauwasagoodcharacter255711 ай бұрын
I personally am glad it’s a constitutional monarchy. I think it brings stability without authoritarianism
@MrWeeseAChine2 жыл бұрын
This channel is so high quality in its education and entertainment that I get giddy seeing a new upload.
@PakBallandSami2 жыл бұрын
“The prince's official job description as king will be 'defender of the faith,' which currently means the state-financed absurdity of the Anglican Church, but he has more than once said publicly that he wants to be anointed as defender of all faiths-another indication of the amazing conceit he has developed in six decades of performing the only job allowed him by the hereditary principle: that of waiting for his mother to expire.” ― Christopher Hitchens
@williamthebonquerer91812 жыл бұрын
You are on a quest to single handily amend Pakistans international reputation
@jonathanwebster70912 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, Ol' Hitch was mistaken in respect to this: the title 'Defender of the Faith' (Latin: 'Fidei Defensor') has absolutely nothing to do with the monarch being head of the Church of England: it was originally granted (somewhat ironically, by the Pope) to Henry VIII for his defence, in his book, of the Roman Catholic Church against Martin Luther and the then-nascent Lutheranism. The title was then *re-granted* to the monarch by subsequent Act of Parliament. It was the later Act of Supremacy that established the monarch being head of the church. So the title is, just like the crown itself, the gift of parliament, who can rescind it by simple Act of Parliament (as they can the crown).
@Brett3232 жыл бұрын
Wow just saw your subscriber count! I’m pumped you’re finally getting some of the recognition you deserve! Congrats!!!
@bfmtrooper54542 жыл бұрын
On the whole king idea. It would be interesting to see a video on hungary after ww2. A regent without a king and an admiral without a navy. Yknow..
@BrammBass2 жыл бұрын
I really enjoy the animation. I even fully watched the sponsored part! Also because I'm happy that you actually found a sponsor. I'm already looking forward for the next video!
@woodlandcreature88572 жыл бұрын
Based on how the modern British Parliament behaves I long for the days of divine right
@brendansunra2 жыл бұрын
Just be glad y'all didn't end up with King Boris. Imagine trying to put a crown on that mop head, yikes!
@woodlandcreature88572 жыл бұрын
@@brendansunra haha that's true, glad we avoided that! However, a Stewart Monarch would be much better than BoJo, would be difficult to be worse
@comeatmebro30122 ай бұрын
“They also added Ireland into the mix.” is a bit of an *oversimplification*
@tyrellarson2 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure the Irish are going to like that last depiction of the UK.... Still... love this channel. Great as always .
@petelosuaniu8 ай бұрын
Have you told the Americans? According to them the Tyrannical King personally led the troops into battle in the American Revolutionary War. In reality, he probably didn’t have a clue what was going on (as he had ongoing dementia and other mental health issues). Parliament had all the power.
@noahmaynard4022 жыл бұрын
Im so shocked. This has the quality of animation and writing as a multi million view channel. Sharing with everyone!
@countschad7 ай бұрын
Please do a video about how and when kings in the UK became figureheads.
@willforest53022 жыл бұрын
Mentioning Henry III without mentioning the role of William Marshal was a great shame. it's also important to mention that the Barons where demanding the ancient liberties of their Anglo-Saxon ancestors that where lost when the normans invaded.
@anderskorsback41042 жыл бұрын
Which is rather ironic considering how the great majority of those barons were descendants of those invading Normans.
@willforest53022 жыл бұрын
@@anderskorsback4104 yes exactly, they where the decendants of both and basically decided the Anglo-Saxons had the right idea on kingship (mainly because it benefited them)
@JollyPirateAhoy2 жыл бұрын
Newly subbed. Me and my 8yo an 6yo love these videos. Kudos to whoever you are
@jalengaalswyk44092 жыл бұрын
new to the channel, content is straight to the point and easy to follow. excellent work
@shoutyshouty2 жыл бұрын
6:06 Wilhelm scream!
@ezekiel06062 жыл бұрын
it's rare for me to ever download from a sponsor but I trust this will be fun
@Sp3kCookie2 жыл бұрын
Okay the sponge bob reference is what makes this channel god damn amazing. Keep up the good work!!!
@Derekzparty2 жыл бұрын
It was my understanding from watching previous KZbin videos that the Queen has the same powers as Charles 1 claimed. If she were to commit a crime she couldn't be arrested because the ability to arrest people is done in the name of "Her Majesty's court service".
@kulrigalestout2 жыл бұрын
That artistic 13th was beautiful!
@thepotatoarmy9802 жыл бұрын
Rest in peace queen
@kevinsworldK.w692 жыл бұрын
What an amazing video for someone who is not experienced within the British early history, this is probably my favorite sidequest video ever
@Zarastro542 жыл бұрын
“100 years later they also added Ireland into the mix; to form the United Kingdom we all know and love!” The Irish: “Are ya sure about that?”
@astr0nox Жыл бұрын
Classic British sarcasm
@shevek59342 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to part 2 about how we got from Queen Victoria's relative political activism to the political neutrality of Queen Elizabeth II.
@Prideace932 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure that those Kings disposed saw the corruption of parliament such as how did the parliament execute Charles is by literally forcing their own people to sign his execution
@luiszuniga28597 ай бұрын
Nobody signed the Magna Carta, it was a verbal agreement between the king and the barons
@wilhelmhetrick89482 жыл бұрын
We did skip over parliament illegally bleeding the monarchy of it's power over time. Here and there they passed little laws that stripped the monarchy of powers such as vetoing many things, raising taxes during a time of war without consulting parliament first and deciding the budget of branches of government etc. until we get to post WW1 where the monarchy lost the last of it's power except as commander of the Royal Armed Forces and the ability to declare war and sign peace treaties. It's a real shame because the monarchy was doing real good for the people in the late 1800s and really was being lead by kings who wanted to better the life of everyone. Parliament actually in many ways caused worsened conditions after WW1 because they gave so much power to big business, and since the monarchy just before the war was working to remove big business monopolies and power the businesses clung to it like never before when they got it back. And it is the cause of many economic problems the UK faces today.
@zacharygustafson87142 жыл бұрын
Mind sharing where you learned this info? I know a fair few loyal chaps who would love to use this info against the republicans.
@wilhelmhetrick89482 жыл бұрын
@@zacharygustafson8714 I wish I could tell you friend, but I've watched hundreds of documentaries and read lots of books about the subject of UK history alone. I just turn on a documentary or audio book when I play games. I really don't remember what specific title of the one it was I got this particular bit of information from. I think the title was something along the lines of "The innocents of the last monarchs of Europe." It was an audio book, and it went over how most of WW1 was to blame on big business buying out parliaments, or what ever version of it a country had to pressure them into wars and how they did it. It also goes over how they used the wars to strip the last of the power away from littlerly all monarchs in Europe. It also shows that WW1 was a war everyone should've saw coming because of all these small micro wars nations were getting in, raising tensions but the media was covering it up because the wars were all basically big businesses competing for resources not countries. Very fascinating stuff. Also I to am a staunch loyalist to the monarchy, though the German monarchy, but I root for the Queen across the channel all the time. I do hope you get your monarchy back and your empire one day.
@FirstNameLastName-gq3uv2 жыл бұрын
@@wilhelmhetrick8948 Is this a LARP?
@wilhelmhetrick89482 жыл бұрын
@@FirstNameLastName-gq3uv yes people having different opinions is clearly the definition of larp
@FirstNameLastName-gq3uv2 жыл бұрын
@@wilhelmhetrick8948 I don’t know, I’ve just never ever met anyone who was pro-monarchy. Like I’ve been plenty of people quibble over what flavor of republicanism a country should adopt, but this is the first time I’m seeing anyone want a return to monarchy. I always thought monarchists were a meme
@tuskiomisham2 жыл бұрын
Every episode gets better. Well done
@Tut3592 жыл бұрын
RIP Elisabeth II
@jasonbarrette49802 жыл бұрын
I swear I just heard an ad that was voiced by this guy right before the video started
@Mars-ev7qg2 жыл бұрын
With people being arrested for holding up signs saying not my king it seems like the current king still has a dangerous amount of power.
@Justin-pe9cl Жыл бұрын
To be fair it’s a stupid thing to do.
@Swissswoosher2 жыл бұрын
4:44 you skipped over the King who brought back Partying, Charles II.
@Arturino_Burachelini2 жыл бұрын
Animated movements of some long standing figures in the frame is somewhat torn... But damn, adaptation of a spongebob meme is priceless I generally thought that obsession with land (in contrast to the obsession with a murdering and pillaging strongman AKA the king) formed somewhere in Germany or Italy (since the realms were long disunited). But your description of the king's court cleared up what took Historia Civillis two protracted videos to cover. No wonder nationalistic historians call England one of the first nations around (plus the Dutch and the Cossacks) since they first started paying attention to land more than to the king.
@ScottishBr4h2 жыл бұрын
Well played at making my eye twitch with the Ireland joke
@lpseudonyml2 жыл бұрын
Congrats on getting that Cards, The Universe, and Everything Money. Hope it helps keep this show going.
@Sakhi_BH2 жыл бұрын
Great video! It's nice to see you grow fast because you deserve it!
@KarlMarshall2 жыл бұрын
5:29 trigger warning
@Caiyde4 ай бұрын
I physically flinched when you covered the Republic of Ireland with the Union Jack
@CoffeeSuccubus2 жыл бұрын
A funny video you could do is talking about how England has no government. It's a funny unknown fact people don't know, England never had a government since 1707 due to the acts of union. There's even a literal England Independence movement!
@The_Captainn2 жыл бұрын
Look at that nice, juicy sub count. I'm not sure what took so long, but lads (and lasses?) you've made it. Congrats, SideQuest! See you at 1 million!
@ecclesiasticman44172 жыл бұрын
1:59 pun moment.
@orphanobliterater70272 жыл бұрын
Great Video. I Am Enjoying These
@derrickstorm6976 Жыл бұрын
People still blaming the royal family for colonialism though
@nachosauce47702 жыл бұрын
"Honey wake up sidequest just posted" 🤩🤩🤩🤩
@FilipinoBoii2 жыл бұрын
RIP for the Queen
@AG4HUNNA2 жыл бұрын
nah
@urmum37739 ай бұрын
@@AG4HUNNA edgy
@ianrogerburton16702 жыл бұрын
LOVE IT ! Very Monty Pythonesque and highly informative, although many historians consider that the process continued right up till Victoria.
@johnz35352 ай бұрын
Charles III should abolish the parliament immediately and restore power to the crown.
@yamz37132 жыл бұрын
One of my new favourite channels! Great animations, short and informative! Didn’t know about the name of “house of commons”
@michele31352 жыл бұрын
Fun to watch my bachelor's degree thesis in a 6 minutes video
@BrownFoxWarrior2 жыл бұрын
I always imagined how much it'd suck to know that you're of royal descent, yet you end up being a celebrity at best with no actual benefit of rolling lucky to be born onto that family.
@RedLogicYT2 жыл бұрын
I've been in the hospital for a week. Hope I get home soon. Thanks for the video.
@qfox167892 жыл бұрын
The UK has actually had queen’s almost exactly 20% of the time
@jackdoyle7453 Жыл бұрын
Pretty sure it was Simon De Montfort who first invited the knights and burroughers.
@PakBallandSami2 жыл бұрын
"No. I am not a royalist. Not at all. I am definitely a republican in the British sense of the word. I just don't see the use of the monarchy though I'm fierce patriot. I'm proud proud proud of being English, but I think the monarchy symbolizes a lot of what was wrong with the country" -Daniel Radcliffe
@jonathanwebster70912 жыл бұрын
Meh, I think there's better people to represent Britain than "that guy who became famous for playing Harry Potter".
@WanderTheNomad2 жыл бұрын
@@jonathanwebster7091 no one's stopping you from quoting those "better people"
@jonathanwebster70912 жыл бұрын
@@WanderTheNomad "Those who imagine that a politician would make a better figurehead than a hereditary monarch might perhaps make the acquaintance of more politicians." -oh no, shit, that's Margaret Thatcher 🤦 the moral equivalent of dog shit, only not as fragrant (or as attractive). To be fair, I hate everything the woman stood for, but I think she had a point this once. Also as someone from the North and more particularly, Lincolnshire, sorry for producing Maggie Thatcher. No really, sorry about that. Sorry.
@jonathanwebster70912 жыл бұрын
@@WanderTheNomad "The monarchy is a political referee, not a political player, and there is a lot of sense in choosing the referee by a different principle from the players. It lessens the danger that the referee might try to start playing" -Bertrand Russell.
@malegria96412 жыл бұрын
Only a few months ago you were so small, im so happy to see you get the subscribers you deserve!
@k.butler8740 Жыл бұрын
At least them Kings kept slavery tamped, until the glorious revolution that is
@gryphonbotha18802 жыл бұрын
5:31
@skashax777x2 жыл бұрын
wait a minute, I'm sure Ireland rebelled took back the southern part of the land mass and GB somehow held on to the Northern land mass we call Northern Ireland? I think you ended a little prematurely, A bone of contempt for many
@KYLETIBOR2 жыл бұрын
@3:37 What a reference A+
@shinxxed2 жыл бұрын
I remember commenting before you got to 100k and now you're so close to 400k. Keep up the amazing videos!
@theblackneon539611 ай бұрын
Went from being an empire with incentive for growth, to a nation inhibited by bureaucracy.
@mueezadam8438Ай бұрын
The British empire was propped up by the exploitation of their colonies. They always were. First it was just Ireland but more and more nations were made to bend the knee
@MrArthoz2 жыл бұрын
Malaysian here...our political party here always complain that our King should follow and obey the constitution and bow to the wishes of the parliament. I always got to explain the British constitutional monarch is different from Malaysian constitutional monarch. The Brits cut off the head of their king and crowned another, the power of the constitution comes from the Parliament. While here, we are absolute monarch only the council of Kings chooses to allow constitutional democratic rule. Constitution and law comes from the king. It's not bad, because often when we got lousy ministers or political parties attempting to subvert the nation or becomes utterly corrupt or abusive to the people...the council of kings just step in threatening to dissolve the democratic rule and revert back to absolute monarchy. There's even provision that the King may reject minister, head minister or prime minister elected for the position. Also the military is directly under the king. Once we had a terrible flood, our king ordered the army to blast a small islet at the river estuary to make the flow bigger and relieve the flooding...he even paid the cost from his own royal treasury. Not to mentioned there's the volunteer regiments of royal guards made of the common citizens in every state to uphold the royal sovereignty. In short democracy works if they work for the people's interest...but now when the elites and corporation corrupted them...all you get is suffering. Here, the parliament are just managers to handle the day to day operation of our nation under the scrutiny of the board of directors which is the Council of Kings...the public servant who works for the people, not some political big shot master dreaming to be the next Churchill or Thatcher. But honestly we do have corruption and scheming politicians...nothing is perfect. But thing is, we even managed to deposed a prime minister and put him in court and caused many more political coalition to collapse is the sign that our form of constitutional monarchy works.
@stevetheheadcrab71102 жыл бұрын
The thing is about stuff like that is. Alot of Kings are corrupt. If he and his council wanted to become an absolute monarch and rule with an iron fists nobody could actually stop them. Considering they control the army. So all it takes is ONE bad egg and kaboom. Hence why in the UK our queen's and King's are only Ceramonial.
@sirsteam64552 жыл бұрын
People forget that regardless of ideology or government people can be corrupt or altruistic whether they a elected official or a Absolute monarch, with either system having their benefits and their weaknesses
@OlvAsterisk2 жыл бұрын
alot of british communist or socialists hate the monarchy lol that just fitting lol
@vaibhavs79482 жыл бұрын
Ahh.. My birthday and my good friend Sidequest. Very Much Invited..
@Ghost-tv1yg2 жыл бұрын
him : the United Kingdom we all know and love me from a UK formal colony : yeah about that
@crowbar95668 ай бұрын
Yeah but your former colony is even less popular 😂😂
@MultiSciGeek2 жыл бұрын
This was interesting, and it got me wondering... Can we get a video on the Dutch please?
@historybuff14jones772 жыл бұрын
English civil war, nice
@ManOfTheWeek5962 жыл бұрын
well the civil war was only one step and not the first one, the parliament already existed before that and had some power, which charles 2 ignored wich lead to said civil war
@historybuff14jones772 жыл бұрын
@@ManOfTheWeek596 I thought it was going to be about the English civil war as it showed the king who I thought was Charles the 1st and a parliamentarian so that’s how I got that assumption
@psychols20078 ай бұрын
What a lot of people don't know is the "Leges Edwardi Confessoris". Apparently, a codified set of laws that stipulated (as well as other things) the responsibilities of the monarch. The reason I say "apparently", is because it's widely understood that these laws were not really based on Edward I rule, but rather as a way to help smooth over the transition of power to William the Conqueror. In any event, these laws (referred to about 1070 and composed about 1135), were a key principle (with language such as "a king who fails in his duty loses the very name of king") in possibly why no English monarch since 1066 has ever held truly despotic power, even before 1215.
@ChopSquadBaby Жыл бұрын
Islamic England would have been so cool 😊 respect to that guy 👑
@mueezadam8438Ай бұрын
Would’ve never happened. Britain’s geopolitical position always saw itself distinguished from continental Europe. Everything from paganism to Christianity was always kept isolated from its neighbours
@ChopSquadBabyАй бұрын
@@mueezadam8438 na, it definitely could have happened 😊
@rubenlarochelle18816 ай бұрын
"The king can't be prosecuted for treason, because treason is against the king!" "The king's behaviour has lead to the king being prosecuted by us and risking his head, I'd say he did in fact act against the king."