I’m glad that someone else acknowledged how Megalania was as big as today’s Saltwater crocs.
@UnwantedGhost1-anz256 ай бұрын
What about weight/mass?
@Jay-jb2vr6 ай бұрын
That's obviously huge
@Sharktoz6 ай бұрын
I always enjoy hearing about this lizard. What I find interesting is that Megalania probably went extinct for the same reasons Megalodon went extinct. It wasn't a single factor, but a multitude of smaller factors that took their toll over time. I imagine humans coming into the picture was the nail in the coffin. Great video my friend.
@abdulazizrex6 ай бұрын
This creature truly was a dragon!
@widodoakrom39386 ай бұрын
Land version of mosasaurs
@knowncoralconsumer6 ай бұрын
the largest squamate of the land vs the largest squamate of the sea
@rishirajsaikia13236 ай бұрын
Mosasaurus was the largest lizard.
@Astrapionte6 ай бұрын
10:08 thanks for featuring and crediting my art! Loved the vid!
@PvtPartzz6 ай бұрын
Megolania? That’s a funny way to say Bunyip.
@bkjeong43026 ай бұрын
This is one of the Australian megafauna we do know was still around when humans showed up, not having succumbed to the continent’s aridification, so take that as you will in regards to why it went extinct. Also, Komodo dragons do NOT hunt by biting prey and waiting for it to die (and their venom is at most a secondary aid, not the main method of killing-something the ORIGINAL STUDY DISCUSSING THEIR VENOM POINTS OUT). They rely on slashing prey open with their jaws and teeth and quickly inflicting physical damage to bring it down instead. The same would have applied to megalania as well (and to the carcharodontosaurs much further back, which were more specialized for this sort of attack)-the idea of large predators biting prey and then doing nothing but follow and wait isn’t supported by the hunting behaviours of any large predators alive today, even those that bleed out their prey.
@spikezilla546 ай бұрын
.....you just said the same fucking thing. A ripping bite that would cause damage and bleeding added with a venom that keeps bleeding going while they move away to lower risk of injury is how it happened.
@UnwantedGhost1-anz256 ай бұрын
I wonder if that sort of tactic is outdated compared to long-distance pursuit hunting today?
@bkjeong43026 ай бұрын
@@UnwantedGhost1-anz25 they’re not mutually exclusive (wolves for example are long-distance pursuit hunted that bleed out large prey). My point is that predators that bleed out prey don’t hunt by biting prey and then just slowing following behind it while doing nothing but wait.
@hooktraining39666 ай бұрын
It's a well known fact that monitor venom stops blood from clotting. This means that the lacerations do not stop bleeding.
@bruceswinford49016 ай бұрын
I'm not sure, Australian Aboriginals art depict more than a few ancient megafauna but megalania is absent
@luisvelez19525 ай бұрын
The Ice Age and ancient Australia animals deserves a movie trilogy film of their own, imagine an antagonist with a tamed Megalania and a protagonist with a prehistoric Lion. Megalania is the real life Kommo-o Pokémon of the modern world.
@ophiophxgic6 ай бұрын
i really enjoyed the video, i just have a small little nit-picky correction, the perentie (V. giganteus) is more closely related to Mertens water monitors (V. mertensi) and Spencers goannas (V. spenceri) the closest living relatives to the Megalania are Lace monitors (V. varius) Komodo Dragons and Crocodile monitors (V. salvadorii) but anyway great video very informative and i love seeing people talk about monitor lizards, i dont believe you touched on it in the video but monitor lizards are very intelligent and it would safe to assume that megalania were also very intelligent and that just makes them so much cooler
@jakemoss35066 ай бұрын
Love the Ark reference 😂
@Alberad086 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for providing this interesting feature!
@zakan48986 ай бұрын
01:50 I like that you put ,,To Walk The Earth" becouse this is true but it is not the biggest lizard ever like you said at this minute and this is a big mistake - this title belong to mossasaurs and they leave the megalania far behind :p
@MourningCoffeeMusic6 ай бұрын
And Titanoboa since snakes are lizards too !
@zakan48986 ай бұрын
@@MourningCoffeeMusic you are right
@jacklantern74796 ай бұрын
@@MourningCoffeeMusicoh come on. Then humans are fish
@bruhmingo6 ай бұрын
@@jacklantern7479snakes are lizards, and humans are fish.
@bruhmingo6 ай бұрын
Huh? He just said it’s the largest to exist, not the largest to walk the earth.
@tsaageotrimm6 ай бұрын
magnificent beast, true monster lizard!
@touremuhammad59836 ай бұрын
When you brought up competitors, my one issue is that Quinkana was not semi-aquatic but was a fully terrestrial crocodile.
@jointcerulean33506 ай бұрын
Yup, that part was completely false, it was a completely terrestrial carnivore all the evidence and data shows it was a land carnivore. It had ziphodont dentition, like allosaurus, and megalania, tall broad vaulted high skull with forward facing eyes and nostrils. It’s pelvis was modified for a pillar stance like other sebecids and croc line archosaurs from the Triassic. And longer limbs. And other related land crocs like mekosuchus, voila, and trilophosuchus. Also Cuban crocs lived in fully terrestrial land ecosystems in the past as well.
@NightStrider3436 ай бұрын
If Megalania lives and evolves, it would be a convergent evolutionary equivalent to the T. Rex.
@jointcerulean33506 ай бұрын
More like a giganotosaurus Quinkana was more like a trex equivalent of the Pleistocene Australia
@andrewshear29276 ай бұрын
Ok, I really liked the video.
@Distix-uz8qr6 ай бұрын
Varanus priscus 🔥🔥🔥🔥
@MrPink-qf1xi6 ай бұрын
A real life Dragon of mythical stature.
@maniacram6 ай бұрын
Lizards aren't dragons.
@SaimonBhattarai26 ай бұрын
@@maniacram Thank you, Captain Obvious!
@maniacram6 ай бұрын
@@SaimonBhattarai2 not only that. They're ugly.
@UnwantedGhost1-anz256 ай бұрын
Looks like reptiles will never have a apex predator niche in the Cenozoic today. But I hoping I'll be wrong as the Australian monitors will one day evolved to be super sized.
@Polosatiy_Varan6 ай бұрын
Crocodiles are the apex predators of today. All land mammals macropredators are way weaker.
@jross95536 ай бұрын
My favourite animal of all time
@gman420026 ай бұрын
Sorry to break it to you, but since all snakes are lizards, taxonomically, Titanoboa was the biggest land lizard with mosasaurus being the biggest lizard of all time
@markcobuzzi8266 ай бұрын
It seems that depends on whether or not one is counting mostly aquatic animals as land animals, by virtue of them spending at least some time out of the water. That is, since Titanoboa is apparently thought to have a mostly aquatic lifestyle, compared to megalania. For example, saltwater crocodiles, walruses, male elephant seals, etc. can all outweigh polar bears. But polar bears are still generally considered the Earth’s biggest land carnivore today, with “land carnivore” implicitly meaning “fully/mostly terrestrial carnivore” in that context.
@Polosatiy_Varan6 ай бұрын
Snakes are not monitor lizards. They are very different from monitors, although they are related.
@colecampbell19066 ай бұрын
I honestly don't believe for a single second that their maximum speed was under 10mph. They were more likely to have been faster than komodo dragons. Maybe their walking speed was 5mph but their running speed had to have been at least 15mph or they wouldn't catch anything to eat.
@jointcerulean33505 ай бұрын
Indeed true, it would be interestingly to see studies on the biomechanics of megalania, and to see what kind of top speeds it can achieve, 15mph speed for megalania is apt. Also other biomechanic studies on the other apex carnivores that lived in Australia at the time in the same Habitat as megalania, such as Quinkana, and thylacoleo. Also I heard about an unpublished species of very large varanid intermediate in size between megalania, and a Komodo dragon in Pleistocene. And another Pleistocene species of ziphodont land crocodile that is distinct from Quinkana and in its own genus, and it’s skull is larger than the holotype skull of Quinkana. Also other unpublished species as well. Also wonder if Perenites actually can hunt kangaroos? Heard the species can which is intriguing.
@Polosatiy_VaranАй бұрын
@@jointcerulean3350 Large perenties can kill an adult kangaroo such as wallaroo.
@kevinnorwood87826 ай бұрын
I'm glad to know that Megalania is still accepted as a valid (if alternate) name for this creature.
@ahmedshaharyarejaz98866 ай бұрын
Ancient Aborigines were real dragon slayers in the past.
@daddypool44746 ай бұрын
Love the fact we got this vid, but have to heavily disagree with the hunting method/ diproptodon scenario. Macropredatory varanids like komodo dragons (iirc now thought to be the closest relative instead of the lace monitor) hunt via mechanical damage and the venom just sometimes gets enough time to cause significant effect or a failed hunt(still a very good job actually properly describing its hunting tactics although a little too much ephasis on venom for my liking while the mechanical potential cand be compared to being land sharks). Tbf bringing big cats was unnecessary as unlike the they don't need to target extremely vulnerable areas like neck or spinal cord cause their bites deliver actual deep lacerating damage anywhere so a bite on a limb renders it useless severing tendons and nerves while an attack on the abdomen would result in a disembowelment (actually we have such an observation documented when a komodo dragon ambushed and immediately gutted a water buffalo open incapacitating it on spot). Kinda sad there was no mention of komodo dragons evelving in Australia and coexsisting with megalania or being in the competition section. Still a great video and hope you will keep on creating future ones
@Polosatiy_Varan6 ай бұрын
Yes, and in Australia and South Asia were also monitors larger than Komodo and smaller than Megalania.
@jointcerulean33506 ай бұрын
Interesting, is it the unpublished new species of Varanus ? Also heard of a varanid in India that was Komodo dragon sized from the Pliocene, might have also been around during the Pleistocene, though fossils only known from Pliocene. And Komodo dragon or possibly Komodo dragon fossils on Java.
@r3n5466 ай бұрын
Great video!
@TheOverseerDebates6 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@paleoguy21656 ай бұрын
0:19 that picture is from my local museum, and I’ve seen it in person. Trust me, the picture doesn’t do it justice. This mount is next to giants like mamenchisaurus and amargasaurus, but even they aren’t as impressive to me as the megalania. You’re select those sauropods to be big. But this thing…was BIG. It’s back legs are as wide as my entire body
@phillipmitchell22546 ай бұрын
Not to be pedantic but keep in mind Titanoboa and Mosasaurs were also lizards, so if you're going by length or weight it may not be accurate to say megalania is the biggest lizard, you could definitely say biggest legged land lizard tho
@markcobuzzi8266 ай бұрын
To be fair, the video’s title at least specifies that it is the biggest lizard to walk the Earth, even if the video itself seems to call it the biggest lizard (period) at one point.
@Polosatiy_Varan6 ай бұрын
Titanoboa is not a lizard, it's a snake.
@Saurian255 ай бұрын
Snakes are *not* lizards.
@phillipmitchell22545 ай бұрын
@@Saurian25 All squamates are lizards.
@Saurian255 ай бұрын
@@phillipmitchell2254 No, they are not … clearly, have no clue on what you talking about, that’s obvious.
@zakan48986 ай бұрын
I see many critique in comment do not bother brother you just got few things wrong or just we are picky material was enjoyable for me and overall good.
@UnwantedGhost1-anz256 ай бұрын
I wonder if a pack of stray dogs or dingoes would easily dominate the majority of early Pliestocene Australia ecosystems over time? Could Megalanias still thrive in the present day?
@Polosatiy_Varan6 ай бұрын
Yes, megalania can thrive in Australia these days. Moreover, Megalania would easily wipe out dingoes, just as Komodo killed dingoes and cats in Indonesia.
@darthmalgus9876 ай бұрын
Please do rex vs deinosucus
@tyrannozilla16 ай бұрын
a real dragon🐉
@rubric-eo5yj11 күн бұрын
quinkana is a land croc or am i wrong
@TheOverseerDebates8 күн бұрын
From what I have read it seems to be debated between terrestrial and semi-aquatic with terrestrial being seemingly sketchy at best. But that doesn’t mean it’s ruled out.
@eddieds3126 ай бұрын
Funny how little tiny lizzards are so fast that you cant catch them with your bare hands. But the big giants ones are as slow as molasses WTF?
@Polosatiy_Varan6 ай бұрын
20-25 km/h is fast for the large land predator.
@supercyc106 ай бұрын
So, curious. Do brits also use the imperial system for convenience? Cause you were flip flopping between that and metric?
@mikes56376 ай бұрын
The guy is Australian.
@supercyc106 ай бұрын
@@mikes5637Ahhhh ok, thank you for correcting. Question still stands.
@dr.orange65095 ай бұрын
@@supercyc10yes; both British and Australian use both (miles ,gallons )etc.
@supercyc105 ай бұрын
@@dr.orange6509cool
@keithcole85366 ай бұрын
Good old science not knowing what something was due to lack of evidence but yet that doesn't stop people from throwing words around
@jointcerulean33506 ай бұрын
What part of the video? There were certainly incorrect parts in the video
@luisvelez19525 ай бұрын
Megalania vs Utahraptor
@jeremyconnor4145 ай бұрын
More
@LoudmouthReviews6 ай бұрын
Largest LAND lizard. Largest period is Mosasaurus as it was at least ten times larger
@blueguy21286 ай бұрын
Bruh the title says "to walk the Earth"
@LoudmouthReviews6 ай бұрын
@@blueguy2128 But in the video he sometimes just says “largest lizard”
@mikes56376 ай бұрын
@@LoudmouthReviews what a pedantic little nitpicker you are. Get a life.
@HENRYxOWL6 ай бұрын
Bruv how did u know that i played ark and thought that
@atticom6 ай бұрын
If course australia
@jointcerulean33506 ай бұрын
The info about Quinkana is completely false, it was 100% a fully terrestrial Carnivore NOT semi aquatic. It had ziphodont dentition serrated teeth like a theropod dinosaurs and like megalania, and like other land crocs such as sebecids and Plannocranids. It also had a tall broad deep valued snout with forward facing eyes and nostrils at the front not the top, lateralization of orbits and nares. And a modified pelvis for a pillar stance like in terrestrial sebecid crocs and Triassic terrestrial archosaurs in which it could not sprawl its limbs due to the configuration of the pelvis for a fully pillar stance. And fossils have been found in caves and other terrestrial landscapes and fossils sights were megalania, thylacoleo and other megafauna have been found. It also would have had long limbs. So this myth about Quinkana being spread to some Degree on some social media sights is quite perplexing because the data and evidence shows it was a fully terrestrial carnivore, not aquatic. Also there were other terrestrial crocs related to Quinkana such as mekosuchus, Trilophosuchus, and voila. Also a new ziphodont fully terrestrial crocodile with a well preserved skull has been found related to Quinkana from Australia and has yet to be fully published. There is a preview paper on it on researchgate. Also Cuban crocodile used to inhabit fully terrestrial landscapes in the Bahamas and Dominican Republic from isotopic data from Cuban croc bones found in blue holes on those islands. Also regarding Quinkana vs megalania 50/50 though more likely Quinkana most of the time due to having larger, more armored protective scutes osteoderms and a more powerful bite, jaws and skull. More likely it would be territorial most of the time, it would be like a Pleistocene version of a tyrannosaurus vs giganotosaurus.
@zoology77646 ай бұрын
Agree Quinkana was fully terrestrial but technically it prefered weter environments compared to megalina
@jointcerulean33506 ай бұрын
@@zoology7764 Indeed true, there are even fossils that indicate the genus was in New Guinea. Also interestingly besides the other ziphodont land croc Similar to Quinkana in Australia, there are even unpublished fossil material on aonther giant Varanid intermediate in size between a Komodo dragon and megalania..
@Saurian255 ай бұрын
You do understand that the megalania was, for one, larger than the Quinkana (and by a significant margin), yes? Not even the largest speculative fragmentary specimen of Quinkana compares, so It is not 50/50 for both, let alone with the quinkana winning most of the time. The megalania is much larger, and its teeth are sharper and capable of dealing more damage than the teeth and jaws of the Quinkana. It also has flexibility, agility, robustness, and armor.
@jointcerulean33505 ай бұрын
@@Saurian25 Well a 6m megalania vs a 3m quinkana, the megalania is winning that 100%, though considering there are fragmentary fossils of quinkana sp, or a closely related ziphodont croc species reaching 6 to 7m in length during the Pliocene. Id say its fair to say if quinkana actually reached 6 to 7m during the Pleistocene its a 50/50 Also quinkana was 100% terrestrial, the ziphodont dentition, skull morphology, and pillar stance pelvic fossils that sebecids had, and its closely related fully terrestrial relatives mekosuchus, trilophosuchus. No evidence for any aquatic lifestyle, those are outdated theories just as thylacoleo being a herbivore, or specialized in eating melons.
@suricata19936 ай бұрын
Namely wise, there used to be a pretty big one also called Tyrant Lizard King, don’t know if anyone ever heard about it 😜😂
@rew46406 ай бұрын
So exactly how can you be sure that it went extinct and it did not just evolved into a smaller size and become one of what we believe is a extant relatives?
@markcobuzzi8266 ай бұрын
If it has not already been tested, I think one possible method could be to run some DNA analyses between those of Australia’s modern monitor lizards and those of megalania fossils (if any of them are young enough to have DNA fragments still intact). If there is a close enough match to for one of the modern species to be a plausible descendant, then that might work. My only other guess would be to check and see whether or not the fossil record shows evidence that the modern species are a separate lineage existing independently from megalania.
@Polosatiy_Varan6 ай бұрын
There are no transitional forms between Megalania and modern Australian macropredatory monitors. And besides, Komodo dragons did not change after migrating to Indonesia.
@Moulton_Lava6 ай бұрын
Megalania or megalovania
@Thetacodile1176 ай бұрын
Their is actually cave art of this animal or more like hieroglyphs drawn by the aboriginals.
@joshuaW56216 ай бұрын
I think it’s time we start debunking the claims that Megalania still exists.
@ophiophxgic6 ай бұрын
im working on an awful archeology style series about herpetology based conspiracy theories and megalania is on my list ;)
@SniperBrutal-ll8oz5 ай бұрын
Lizard
@deweycollins83546 ай бұрын
I've heard aboriginal stories about it, some think it's still around
@jointcerulean33505 ай бұрын
More likely New Guinea. Though a 3m monitor seems more likely