Where did the woolly mammoths go?

See the full interview with Dr Tas Walker here: • Only the Bible Can Exp...

[@creationministriesintl]

See the full interview with Dr Tas Walker here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/lYTSYZelaNOCjtk For more information and further reading, see: → The Woolly Mammoth - creation.com/woolly-mammoth → Mammoth-riddle of the Ice Age - creation.com/riddle → Why a mass extinction at the end of the Ice Age? - creation.com/kill-chill-ill → What caused the Ice Age? - creation.com/what-caused-ice-age → Secular scientific problems with the Ice Age - creation.com/ice-age-problems

[@user-ds2ej3wn8p]

There was no ice age. The mammoths instantly snap froze due to the collapse of the water mantle, this is why they are found with undigested food in their stomachs and buttercups still in their mouths. Before the collapse of the water mantle Antarctica has lush green vegetation. There is no mention of seasons until after the flood. There were also no desserts before the flood, Potsdam university calculated that the age of the Saharan desert to be only 4400 years, the flood occured 4400 years ago unknown to the Potsdam university.

[@creationministriesintl]

@@user-ds2ej3wn8p Please see the the video and articles linked in the comment you replied to. There was an ice age, the Flood provides an excellent explanation for it, and the evidence with woolly mammoths is consistent with it. The canopy theory was once popular, but has since been abandoned with good reason. For an explanation, see: → Were “the waters above” a vapour canopy? creation.com/vapour-canopy-problems → Why the canopy theory doesn’t hold water - kzbin.info/www/bejne/rJCXfqZraZZrbs0

[@chopppacalamari]

⁠@@creationministriesintlthe mammoths were there before the flood. And they did snap freeze. They stayed there still frozen during the flood. And yes the flood caused the ice age. The broken ice shell rode the magnetic field and all fell at the poles. That’s the only way to get minus 250 on the surface of the earth.

[@user-ds2ej3wn8p]

@@creationministriesintl The bible teaches that there was a mantle before the flood.Flora and fauna grew differently to gigantic proportions, and experiments have been conducted in the US, tomato plants grown as tall as trees, in atmospheric conditions that mimicked the water mantle, increased CO2 on O2,. Experiments in aquariums produced giant fish. Before the flood different atmospheric pressure allowed animals such as dinosaurs to exist, after the flood dinosaurs ceased to exist since partial air pressure was insufficient to support them, dinosaur fossils prove that dinosaurs had small nostrils and could not have survived in today's post flood world. You're entitled to your opinion I guess but again there was no ice age, there was a sudden transition from no seasons to seasons, there would have been minor differences in temperature at the poles.

[@CharlesEBright]

Very interesting.

[@NewcreationinChrist-dg2gs]

God bless you CMI ☺️🙏✝️ praying for you

[@johnnywilson715]

If you're in the Bible, you'll find out exactly where.

[@hemramachandran5626]

Yeah right! Keep believing!

[@SalvableRuin]

I read Michael Oard's book on the ice (or one of them) and it was fascinating. I have yet to see an atheist explain the data in a way that fits the evidence.

[@relativetruth8889]

Ask a direct question instead of agreeing with pseudo-science & purporting to be open minded... ... I'll give you the current science on any question you want in a simple form...

[@JesusSavesRepent]

@@relativetruth8889 Why is evolution still a theory?

[@relativetruth8889]

@JesusSavesRepent it's a theory & a fact: it's observable in easy to visualise microcosms... somewhat analogous to how evolution works over millions of years... one of the simplest to grasp is with artificial selection: comparing dog breeds between the early 20th century & the 21st century is one example / artificial selection is used comprehensively in agriculture also... broccoli & kale & Brussel sprouts all stem from wild mustard plants etc.... ... the fossil-record is extremely robust in some instances & lacking in others: but through that record, we know humans have a common ancestor with the other great apes... we just don't have time machines to prove these things: just gene sequences & fossils.... ... when theists demand absolute detail from events hundreds of millions of years ago & yet their discernment level for nonsense gives talking snakes and zombie resurrections a pass... well, there's nothing that will open their eyes... ... the fact creationism is not taught in any school in a country where 9/10ths of the population profess to believe in God speaks volumes...

[@alancoates8955]

​@@JesusSavesRepent a scientific theory is an explanation of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and corroborated using the scientific method of observation measurements and evaluation of results . Now you know the difference between a theory and scientific theory

[@stanley626]

@@JesusSavesRepent you obviously don’t understand the term “theory “ when used in a scientific context

[@jobertus660]

Best answer ever. He must be a comedian

[@rickallen9167]

Wooly mammoths and Noah's ark... A good interpretation of retrospective evidentialism... Given enough time and faith anything is not only possible, it's permissible too.

[@davidcolgan5803]

Siberia? Woolly mammoth have been found all over North America

[@mrsogre]

Woolly mammoths have been found in permafrost. Permafrost does not consist of dust.

[@dougbarrett7803]

The woolly mammoth was before the ark

[@mchooksis]

This guy is just making things up as he goes along. Completely contrary to the evidence.

[@Concerned-Nihilist]

OK, so at the end of the ice age, Siberia froze over again? Make that make sense. The ice age in the tundra's permafrost never really ended.

[@nickstreeservice4454]

They think ice age now as ice caps. Ice age is prior to nova of our sun. They think it was all created 6k yrs ago. . Just to confuse everyone.

[@Bruce-vq7ni]

"Noah's Ark" - - - 🤣😅😆🤣

[@charlo90952]

Shouldn't Google put a disclaimer on this stuff?

[@user-sy4ov7tb3q]

Why?

[@7thdayman]

Because many people want restrictive rules on things that trigger them until they realize the same rules traps them. Freedom of speech is freedom for everyone. Freedom to believe accordibg to dictates of conscience is imbedded in your constitution. If you disagree you have freedom to do that too.

[@randytriplett5106]

No you got that one wrong! They froze almost instantly when the canopy collapsed

[@nickstreeservice4454]

Maybe. . Right on for knowing of the water canopy. Do you know how a water canopy ?

[@SalvableRuin]

No, they didn't.

[@victorcoenen5471]

Why weren't the poor neanderthals not allowed to board Noah's Ark 😂 Come on, guys!

[@Ange65230]

It was a great place to live! Really!! You were there were you?

[@davidrudd6550]

I’m a Christian… love Christ, but these literalists are wacko

[@nickstreeservice4454]

It took 1000 yrs for the water to settle and the ice caps to form after the water canopy broke. I like your thought on the mamoth being on the ark. The 1000 yr old large elephants would fall into the preflood era . I think the old ones floated on the flood waters and froze in the ice caps as they developed.

[@SalvableRuin]

There were no mammoths on the ark, and no Creationist claims they were. You can mock all you want. It doesn't change the reality of Noah's Flood.

[@relativetruth8889]

​@@SalvableRuinspeciation?... in less than 6,000 yrs?... you know things aren't qualified as fossils till 10,000 yrs.... thus pseudo-science nonsense will never be taught in any of the millions of schools kids go to to learn... you know why?... the earth wasn't made on the 23rd October 4004bc... & talking snakes never existed... you'd do better casting off your cozy blankey...

[@CRuM770]

If only there was some evidence for the water canopy instead of desperate attempts by creationists to explain ridiculous stories in an ancient book written by barbarians who knew nothing of the world around them. No evidence of a worldwide flood, no evidence of a migration of all of the animals of the world from a point of origin, and no evidence of a water canopy. 0 for three, yooouuu'rrrre OUT!

[@JACKnJESUS]

Gibberish....

[@JamesDavis-ky6fj]

I’m a catholic and love god but these guys are wonky

[@jeffreybrandes881]

I lost you at Noah's ark. 😂

[@nickstreeservice4454]

The one they did the sonar scans on in turkey reciently. . Yup . . Its the ark !

[@jeffreybrandes881]

@@nickstreeservice4454 😆 🤣 😂

[@nickstreeservice4454]

What did you find on the ark ? Or its just rocks ? Dont be shy now. . The world is watching for your athiest answer​@jeffreybrandes881

[@jeffreybrandes881]

@@nickstreeservice4454 Fairytales are true for you. 😆

[@nickstreeservice4454]

Thats the athiest answer to avoid not understanding. If there was a ice age then the world was ice and nova of our sun ended the ice. It evaporated from the heat of nova. It went to the thermosphere and stayed there. It made a water canopy around the world. Thus 1000 yr old animals that lived long. Only way for that to happen. People lived 969 yrs old under the canopy. The oceans were above. If you track halies comet it came very close to earth and knicked it. The oceans fell. Huge global massive flood. Only way there also. So if you look you will see it clearly. Nova of our sun and a messed up solar system to ahow it. Uranis on its side and the rings on Saturn are debris from nova. Jupiter has oppsite rotating moons. Many more on each planet. So check that out !! You were lied to in the public school system . You are not from a monkey.​@@jeffreybrandes881

[@MrGlobal88]

On the other side of the ice wall

[@peterjm5707]

Stick to your religion leave the science to the smart people

[@EagleZoo]

Its OK for you to quit watching at any point. There is no such thing as freedom from religion. The ones that are professors in their own faith within colleges are doing way more damage to society.

[@richardelliott9511]

Seems to be more than a few holes on that theory....

[@SalvableRuin]

Yet you pointed out none. Curious.

[@aricar705]

Wrong! This is so ignorant.

[@Night_Crew_Artist]

Let me guess. You believe the lies taught to you in high school about evolution? You were brainwashed, and you should listen to creationist scientists to gain the truth.

[@Night_Crew_Artist]

Ignorance is only looking at one side of a topic and assuming it is correct.

[@aricar705]

@@Night_Crew_Artist this person believes that humans and dinosaurs roamed the earth at the same time I’m sorry. It’s freaking stupid and ignorant. There’s plenty of scientific evidence against it, but I guess I should just accept this guy’s interpretation of the Bible. I’m a Christian by the way. I admire his enthusiasm, but it just didn’t happen.

[@foreignwarren7361]

​@@Night_Crew_Artistno ignorance is ignoring global scientific consensus.

[@jvelez5381]

No scientific consensus on this. Just cuz a few scientists have written books