Where in Houston can you see the Earth’s rotation in action? | Foucault’s Pendulum

[@chenzog6657]

Freemason trickery. 😂

[@chenzog6657]

How stupid to prove the spin with this motorized device. Why don’t the controllers have a live feed of the earth spinning from a satellite. Because it doesn’t spin and it’s not a sphere.

[@stuartgray5877]

We measure earth rotation using fiber-optic gyroscopes tens of thousands of times a day worldwide.

[@jamesbarrett9066]

There is no motor in this device, been to several of them, but it does take understanding basic physics and use of one's brain. Flerfs are simple people without these basic talents.

[@aidanwelton6083]

​@@jamesbarrett9066 glerf

[@No_OneV]

One of the greatest inventions mankind has ever produced.

[@2Wheeligniter]

If the earth is spinning 😂😂 under the pendulum lmao, that means the building the pendulum is attached on is spinning too, making them all into an enclosed system, therefore the pendulum is not independent of the earth spin to show the spin, it is all part of it the building included. This is a bunch of crap, the earth is perfectly stationary. Believe your own senses people dont get fed lies.

[@stuartgray5877]

Fiber-optic gyroscopes prove you wrong

[@jamesbarrett9066]

The very long cable and the weight of the ball at the end as well as the basic laws of physics and the momentum isolate it from the fixed closed system you are claiming.

[@jamesbarrett9066]

Obvious you have never looked through a telescope.

[@JiminyClarkson]

If the earth spins at a very stable speed along with everything else on the earth with it, why would you be able to sense it is spinning?

[@rogerledwell5776]

It's a pallor trick

[@alexf962]

Is this what It feels to be mentally insane?

[@Kiwigucci]

I’m not a flerfer, but will that thing not only work if it’s position is at the poles??

[@DazzaOnGoogle]

The rate of precession depends quite specifically on latitude

[@ConnieFWill]

It works everywhere except on the equator

[@backyardlures4767]

This doesn't make any sense to me in a play like Texas, maybe the north or south poles

[@raymondpenacovfoff9784]

Love it 🤜🏼💥🤛🏼🌏🌍🌎👁️☀️

[@mrf3327]

Proof of magnetism

[@sH-ed5yf]

aha and why does it rotate

[@weschilton]

Its pretty clear that you do not understand what magnetism is or how it works. Brass (what this is made of) is NOT magnetic, so magnetism would have no affect on the pendulum.

[@jamesvega8676]

​@@weschiltonSo you were part of the team that put this together and know for fact it's pure brass?

[@johnpurefeeling6258]

​@@jamesvega8676 It has an iron core tending towards the magnetic meridian, a small electromagnetic ferromagnet which occasionally gives a push to make the pendulum swing indefinitely, a so-called Charron ring to eliminate the non-uniform variances in the plane of oscillation and last but not least, no one has considered that in physics a ball tends most of all to produce a circular motion, the weight of the ball makes a difference too and now tell the fairy tale of gravity and no one thinks anymore about the strong electromagnetic field of the earth. Et voila, a pendulum seemingly swinging with the rotation of the earth, in a closed frame. And why do people think the earth rotates? cause the pendulum is seemingly swinging with the rotation of the earth! It is always said that the earth would rotate below the pendulum, but it could just as well be that it is the pendulum swinging above the earth. There is no point in preferring one conclusion to the other. PS: The Allais effect states that during solar eclipses, the sun's emitted electromagnetism creates noticeable disturbances in the vibrational plane. Without Charronring, you couldn't just use what's not permanent in favor of or against a given sentence, because then you put the cart before the horse and violate honest investigative laws. It will not start to swing on its own and will stop eventually, cause we stand still. Set up several pendulums without a Charron ring, with otherwise the same parameters, in the same place and you will get several different results, since the oscillation cannot be constant.

[@jamesbarrett9066]

@@jamesvega8676 It takes understanding basic physics as to why this need not be magnetism.

[@LL-ue3ek]

What has been done to overcome the air friction that would eventually slow down the bob?

[@rogerledwell5776]

Research flat earth

[@RamseyRacing423]

Your joking right

[@davidj231]

​@@RamseyRacing423the Earth is objectively not a globe with a circumference of 24,901 miles at the equator. It appears to be a topographically-level horizontal plane and it absolutely is not rotating - the sky rotates above us. But no amount of logic will convince those who wish to remain willfully ignorant in their mainstream indoctrination... so enjoy your sci-fi globe 😂🤡

[@RamseyRacing423]

@@davidj231 sunset alone debunks you pizza planet a 1st grader could understand that, upside down moon in Australia, stars move in opposite directions in the northern and southern hemispheres, and move different from that at the equator, impossible on a flat earth

[@davidj231]

@@RamseyRacing423 yet still no evidence of that elusive curvature required to be consistent with the Earth being a globe with a circumference of 24,901 miles... even 1st graders understand that balls must have curves - at least until they're brainwashed into being the next generation of globe cultists. 🤣👌🤡

[@RamseyRacing423]

@@davidj231 your conspiracy is also unrealistic, basically half the population is lying, when do we get let in on the lie ? College ? Grad school ? At what point do we get to know the secret ?

[@rogerledwell5776]

They don't work

[@rogerledwell5776]

Lol earth spin

[@stationary.universe.initiative]

great

[@jimygod]

Houston we have a problem. The earth is not rotating around Foucault’s Pendulum. This would only happen at either pole. The earth is said to rotate west which would be in a direction under Foucault’s Pendulum. So it would not appear to move in a clockwise or counter clockwise manner anywhere but the poles.

[@ChristianIce]

Wrong.

[@jimygod]

@@ChristianIce What's wrong? Do you not understand your belief?

[@ChristianIce]

@@jimygod What I believe is irrilevant, your analysis is factually wrong, and also dumb. Here's the dumb part: "it would not appear to move in a clockwise or counter clockwise manner anywhere but the poles."

[@jimygod]

@@ChristianIce The pendulum is said to just swing over and back, it only appears to move because of earth's alleged rotation. At the poles this would be like a merry go round rotating around the pendulum. Anywhere else on earth, the alleged rotation would be like a Ferris wheel rotating directly underneath the centre of the pendulum. If you set the pendulum in motion with the alleged rotation, why would it appear to move?

[@ChristianIce]

@@jimygod No. On the poles it will take 24 hours to spin 360 degrees, on the equator it would not spin at all, everywhere in between it will spin proportionally, as it infact does, on the hundreds of installations around the globe. "At the poles this would be like a merry go round" No, it would spin back and forth and take one day to complete 1 circle.

[@johnnysudaca9713]

🤣🤣

[@alexf962]

Bet you are a flatearther

[@williamjensen365]

I used to be a pin-setter for a Foucault pendulum. Usually had to polish it too, because people would touch it and get fingerprints all over it. Sometimes also had to get the moon rock out of the safe and put it in the exhibit.

[@jameseves9209]

Well then you know it has a magnet in the 235 lb brass pendulum that is electronically controlled and it's all fake bullsh*t or you're a complete idiot NPC.

[@ronaldstallworth5925]

Bullshit

[@alexf962]

LMaO another angry flatearther that did not hear what he wanted. Pathetic

[@IBDESIGN]

fake

[@alexf962]

Butthurt flatearther

[@biser1901]

0:24 „Foucault's pendulum is often cited as proof of the rotating Earth, but upon closer investigation it proves just the opposite. To begin with, Foucault's pendulums do not swing equally in a particular direction. Sometimes they spin clockwise and sometimes counter-clockwise, sometimes they fail to spin and other times they spin too much. The behavior of the pendulum actually depends on: 1) the initial force that caused the swing or application of electromagnets 2) the apple-shaped hinge used, which readily facilitates circular movement over any other. The supposed rotation of the Earth is irrelevant and completely irrelevant to the swing of the pendulum. If the supposed constant rotation of the Earth affected the pendulums in any way, there would be no need to manually set them in motion. If the circadian rotation of the Earth causes a 360° uniform circadian rotation of a given pendulum, then there should be no stationary pendulum anywhere on Earth! But let's take a closer look at the work of the pendulum. Let's start with momentum first. Many intelligent people say that the movement of the pendulum is caused by its momentum, but the Heliocentric theory tells us and teaches us that we move at four different speeds and in four different directions at the same time (except for the movement around the axis at a speed of 1666km/h, 2-second motion around the Sun at a speed of 107,000 km/h, a 3-thirds spiral motion in one of the arms of the Milky Way, together with all the planets of our Solar System, moons, satellites, ISS satellites and space junk formed by the thousands of rockets launched into "Space " spiraling around a huge Sun 112 times the size of the Earth a grain of sand moving at a speed of 804,670 km/h and 4 fourth the motion of our entire Galaxy moving 2,800,000 km/h, not including the tilt motion on the axis of 23.4(66.6) degrees, as a twitch that serves for the seasonal variations and the time difference during the winter and summer periods, that is, Foucault's pendulum excludes all these movements and accepts the momentum only from the movement along axis of the Earth ignoring all others in the Heliocentric theory. And the Heliocentrics claim that this is momentum. But do we really know what momentum is, what causes it to happen, and what momentum does? But no Heliocentric can give a meaningful and logical explanation involving these movements, for example, our body keeps doing what it does because we have momentum, well, but what is momentum? Inertia is the tendency of a body to keep moving, well that's great, but why does it keep doing what it's doing? Answer: - Maybe because there is momentum there is momentum. What? OK, but what is momentum? Answer: - Tendency of a body to retain motion and continue to do so. OK, but why does it? Answer: - Because there is inertia,..etc., and so we go round in a circular reasoning, like a magic circle in which you will not get a meaningful answer. So that Inertia is quite possible to be a Universal Property of Inertia, which Universal Inertia is only possible if there exists an Aether in space, or a rigid boundary between the atmospheric gas and the suction vacuum, which rigid boundary may be the very source causing Foucault's Pendulum to moves as does the Coriolis Effect and so people like Einstein and other "Scientists" cannot use Foucault's Pendulum as proof that the Earth moves. The Coriolis Effect, as well as Foucault's KZbin✞😆 Pendulum KZbin✞😆, as well as the Gyroscope, which shows 15 degrees of deflection when forced into motion, as . Heliocentrics argue that they demonstrate two completely different frames of reference, that is, t ..e., we must have two completely different inertial frames of reference, one reference frame being the Earth, which with one inertial frame and the second inertial frame being the atmosphere(air), where the "Foucault Pendulum" and the "Coriolis Effect" are together in the same inertial frame of reference, which are attached to the Earth, moving and assuming motion in the direction of the assumed eastward rotation of the Earth under the second non-inertial frame of reference, which is the atmosphere. Heliocentrics claim that they demonstrate two completely different frames of reference, that is, to have the "Coriolis Effect" we must have two completely different inertial frames of reference, one frame of reference being the Earth, which appears as the first inertial frame and the second non-inertial frame this is the atmosphere (air), in which demonstrations are obtained a statement that everything that flies in the atmosphere (air) such as fired bullets, projectiles, airplanes, thrown balls, birds, insects, helicopters , drones, smoke, clouds, and everything in the air remain stationary in this atmosphere as a second non-inertial frame of reference, and everything on Earth, which is the first a different frame of reference rotates and moves in the east direction of the supposed rotation of the Earth, that is, when we are in a Helicopter or Airplane in the atmosphere that travels in the South direction we must see how the continents, plains and the earth's surface below us, which are second frame of reference, to travel and move in an Eastern direction, which in reality no human has observed such an effect. If a Heliocentric claims that the atmosphere is stuck immovably to the Earth and rotates synchronously with the Earth, then we will not have two frames of reference, but only one frame of reference, in which case we will not have the "Coriolis Effect" nor the "Pendulum Effect" Foucault' nor the laser gyroscope effect which claims to have a 15 degree deflection because they all demonstrate two different inertial frames of reference which are attached to the Earth as the first frame of reference and the atmosphere (air) as the second frame of reference. The "Foucault's Pendulum" as well as the "Coriolis Effect" move in the direction of the supposed rotation of the Earth, and Heliocentrics explain the movement of the pendulum as a result of it being the moment of inertia of an object from a circular path to a rectilinear one due to that the momentum makes it move in a given direction while the Earth is rotating below us at that moment, that is, the frame of reference and the circular motion continues to rotate under the rectilinear moving pendulum. Heliocentrics explain that the pendulum motion occurs because it is the moment of inertia of an object from a circular path that turns it into a rectilinear one, because the momentum causes it to move in a given direction while the Earth rotates below us in this moment, that is, the frame of reference and the circular motion continues to rotate under the rectilinearly moving pendulum. This means that the helicopter that rises above the Earth, the airplane that travels through the air, that air appears as a second completely separate frame of reference, the Earth below it continues to rotate, but this is not actually happening in our actual reality proving it with the natural observations of flying butterflies, insects, clouds, balloons, airplanes and helicopters, yet in some magical and capricious way the motion of the Foucault Pendulum synchronizes with the rotating axial rotation and it actually slows down its motion by knowing when the atmosphere slows down as you head towards the poles where the speed of 1600 km/h at the equator with a diameter of 40,000 km the speed eventually becomes almost equal to 0 km/h. in the direction of the poles and is exactly what the Heliocentrics tell us is true. But where does the atmosphere actually stop rotating, ie. where and at what height does the air itself not rotate? Nobody knows. If we go up and rise in a balloon we travel up to the upper reaches of the atmosphere, what happens there? Total nonsense that makes us think that the atmosphere, the air, is somehow applied and completely synchronized perfectly at a height of 1,000 miles up to the very surface of the Earth, yet we have clouds and winds blowing in all directions, causing a big problem with the Heliocentric theory. It is Pseudo-Science by its very definition that , they have never discovered, never proven or scientifically shown using the scientific method, exactly where this synchronization ends, how it synchronizes poleward with deceleration and, where is the limit and at what height does the vacuum begin and how is the pressurized atmospheric air contained which is effectively a gas in an open space together with the highly suction and absurd vacuum without any hard boundary. These are absurdities that are necessary to save the Heliocentric theory that we know from school from the earliest, fragile, vulnerable childhood susceptible to suggestion and programming age, on par with our belief in Santa Claus (Santa Claus) to create behavioral and command control over our mind and our naive childish consciousness!

[@alexf962]

Whatever you wrote Is false. A single sunset proves flatearth impossible. Everything you wrote Is nothing but deliberate misinterpretation of actual science meant to prove something that does not exist but gives you emotional comfort. There Is no flatearth model, there Is no flatearth map, there Is no flatearth.

[@Markorcallmeyo]

But isn't the pendulum from which it's hanging from , rotating as Earth?

[@weschilton]

Not really, the pendulum bob and cable are attached to a 360-degree free swivel. Once in motion the heavy bob's momentum wants to carry it in a straight line back and forth. But as the Earth rotates the pendulum appears to rotate (since we are fixed to the Earth our viewpoint is in relation to it, but its actually the Earth (and we) that are rotating. There is a very very small amount of inertia added to the swing through the friction of the swivel, but its minor compared to the momentum of the large linear swing.

[@Spliffie37]

Perpetual energy

[@IAmOnFyre]

unfortunately, gravity will eventually stop it. It's efficient, but not perpetual. They'd have to give it a push every now and then

[@Spliffie37]

@@IAmOnFyre it wil not gravity has nothing to do with it. It the rotation of the earth... and yes it will end when the earth ends....

[@weschilton]

@@Spliffie37 No, you are completely wrong.