Where Was the Temple in Jerusalem? (Episode #4) Archeological Evidence?

Many Christians now believe that the Temple was located in the City of David, rather than in the traditional location on the Temple Mount. We’ve debunked all of the myths that attempt to prove this claim. However, many wonder if there is any archaeological evidence that the Jewish Temple was actually on the Temple Mount.
Today, we went on the hunt to look for evidence of the Temple at its traditional location. You’ll be shocked at what we found.
Are you ready to find out the truth? Episode #4 in our six-part series “The Temple: the Search for its True Location” premieres today.
You’ll want to subscribe to the channel so that you don’t miss out on any of the upcoming episodes in this cutting-edge video series.
If you’d like to help us make more videos on location here in Israel, please consider making a one time or monthly donation to The Israel Guys: theisraelguys.....
Purchase the book, Jesus Loves the Temple: shop.theisrael...
Learn more about this topic as well as the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem:
www.cryforzion...
jerusalemtempl...
Twitter: / theisraelguys
Facebook: / theisraelguys
Instagram: / theisraelguys
Subscribe to our Rumble channel: rumble.com/c/T...
Make sure to subscribe, and sign up for the rest of our content at theisraelguys.....
Download “The Israel Guys” social media app: theisraelguys.....
#theisraelguys #templemount #jerusalem

[@HadasahB]

It is time! THIS is such a needed series! Thank you, Israel Guys!

[@janiceridsdale2904]

Thank you very much for these 4 episodes , all the EVIDENCE & work it took to gather it all . Grately appreciated .

[@debrawolfrunninghorses77emma]

what a great episode. I say right on. I especially like the trumpeting stone at the foot of the Temple Mount. Great work, Israel 🇮🇱 Guys

[@barneygimble8984]

This video claims the steps were not fast enough for Roman soldiers. Some animal bones, maybe kfc And WHAT? if this video showed any proof of the location of an ancient Jewish temple ,it would have been the first prrof EVER shown. This is NOT proof that a temple ever existed Just bulls#it assumptions

[@richardfetzer4933]

I play the trumpet. Standing there is something I've often thought about. The shofar is easy. The type of trumpet they used at those locations were metal, large, and loud. And their sounding was never ignored. And quite a privilege to be responsible for!!!

[@AntonioRodrigues-cc2fw]

Glory to Jesus Christ and blessing the Israel Guys.

[@hakamgill4555]

GOD BLESS you love from Pakistan Lahore blessed Israel plz pray for me amazing study good job

[@cindypollard7972]

I love all this discussion on the temple. I was in Israel in 2015. The first thing I did was to ignore all the Catholic holy sites. I looked for true Biblical locations. Thank you for discussing all the location theories and what Scripture says. I love all the discussion of Scripture.

[@christopherscallio2539]

Then You'll Love This. kzbin.info/www/bejne/mHXKmISopZaafbc

[@skylinestudiosrc]

Why would you do that ?

[@anlerden4851]

I love your programs so much Dear Israel Guys.😊😇🥰😍🤗

[@christianapologetics7161]

I can't wait for the next episode! Great work team! God bless you all!

[@TheIsraelGuys]

Thank you

[@jonathankuaana2115]

Maybe the next episode will show the construction of the 3rd temple and they'll be getting rid of that sight for sore eye, the Al-Aqsa mosque. Long live Israel 🇮🇱 forever and ever

[@donovanwint1277]

You guys are really so very slick with your presentation of the location of the Temple and the Temple Mount.

[@AJAJade]

This is amazing! I don’t know why but Infound myself in tears at the end of this episode!!!!! It is so beautiful how you have put this together! Thank You! YHVH BLESS YOU AND KEEP YOU!!!!

[@rosalynseglem5022]

You boys have done an amazing job revealing the TRUTH! THANKYOU!!

[@tonysaint6749]

thank you from Australia, for clearing this up. God bless you and your work.🙃

[@smuir6104]

This series is one of the best you have ever done

[@TheIsraelGuys]

Thank you!

[@kevinpritchard3592]

Watched the entire series.....GREAT JOB GUYS

[@monamorgan8202]

God bless you for showing us the truth. Happy Feast of Trumpets!

[@reneelapenna6289]

Thank you so much for making this series! So important that the other theory be thoroughly debunked as you have done

[@barneygimble8984]

Why do you think it is important? Do you want to start a war over it? Do you deny alaqsa is 1400 years old?

[@Enochphilw]

They havent debunked it they are using trickery and peer pressure to decieve the masses.

[@rjanmyhre]

@@barneygimble8984 al aqsa is not even 1000years old. Start a war??? No belivers in Yeshua and the Jewish people from Israel doesn't start wars. It's important because it confirms the Biblical story.

[@barneygimble8984]

@@rjanmyhre did modern Israel start a war with the British?

[@janiceridsdale2904]

Barney , would it make you feel good to be denied Your Most HOLY place of worship , due to HATRED & JEALOUSY ? ISLAM has Mecca & Medina . GOD - LOVEING - KIND - JUST - Wants people to live in peace , so ISRAEL even though GOD has given them the Victory every time - gives up more land - temple mount - etc. To what spoiled brats who pout & wine & throw a TANTRUM every time they dont get there way = Surrender that devils deceptive Qur'an & come back to JESUS = GOD LOVES YOU - BUT HIS incredible patience WILL wear out & it is so sad the outcome for those who REFUSE GOD's undeserved ( we - all have sinned & fall short of the GLORY of a HOLY GOD ) MERCY.

[@blancarosabeltranvelazquez4176]

Exciting episode!. Thank you very much for sharing!. 🇮🇱

[@donovanwint1277]

So very, not only interesting, but exiting to Boot. Bless you Guys.

[@deonvandermerwe3000]

You 'Guys' have really upped your production quality and impact of your presentations. It really is good. Well done and thank you for awesome work.

[@hxhdfjifzirstc894]

I really did not enjoy the production, specifically. All show, no go.

[@rjanmyhre]

@@hxhdfjifzirstc894 so go watch something else

[@larryjones-emery807]

I am so grateful for this information!

[@drknockers5716]

Great series well done

[@stewiefy]

Ps 3:21 - 23 Ps 3:24, 25, 26 Zech 14:1-4 Rev 11:7-15 (October 2022 - Nisan 5786) Mark 13:10-27 Matt 24:14-29 Joel 3:14-16 Isa 13:9-12 Amos 8:11-12 Rev 14:8-12 Rev 13:12-18 Rev 18:2-23 Rev 6:12

[@AngieLeuallen]

Thank you guys, we appreciate you, shalom!

[@johnclonch9344]

I love series about Israel archeology, it’s proven the factuality of the Bible, keep up the good work.

[@jonkomatsu8192]

Baruch HaShem! Mahalo shalom! 🤍💙🇮🇱✡️

[@montanatony5838]

My new favorite channel guys!

[@danovantuyl7911]

Interesting and well thought out, kinda helps when you're being things on facts and evidence, but well done! What's next, I can't wait.

[@barneygimble8984]

No facts No evidence Only assumptions See 8:08

[@antonioflores7123]

I thank you two gentlemen from the very bottom of my heart for quashing the doubt sneaking into my soul regarding the true location of the Temple of Hashem. My paternal grandfather's sister I'm am certain rests in the afterlife more contentedly because her name was Nicanor. As you know that is the name of the doorway in the gallery that when open one could see the Holy Temple beyond.

[@AnimeOtakuDrew]

Just watched the four episodes you've released so far. Loving this series and eager for the remaining episodes. This series earned my subscription. Thank you for these great videos!

[@TheIsraelGuys]

Glad you like them!

[@phearlesspharaoh3697]

Great content but i won’t be subscribing… they are very divisive by constantly trying to debunk Robert Cornuke, and calling him a liar.

[@AnimeOtakuDrew]

@@phearlesspharaoh3697 From the approach they're using, it doesn't seem as though they are trying to prove or disprove any one idea or person, but rather looking at the evidence and seeing what conclusion it points to without being swayed by any previous ideas or assumptions. In fact, at first it seemed that their analysis was indicating his ideas might be correct. Then the evidence against it started to stack up. It's not at all that they are calling him a liar, they are simply analyzing that evidence and drawing the conclusion that he was mistaken in his hypothesis. That's just part of being a researcher and/or scientist; you do your studies and draw your conclusions based on the evidence, but other researchers can look at that evidence and/or other evidence that leads them to a different conclusion. It doesn't mean ANYONE is lying, it just means one of the conclusions is wrong. Also, it seems to me, however, that Cornuke is the one calling people liars; he's the one who said of another researcher that is supposedly his friend that they know the truth but won't admit it because of the way they would be ostracized. It becomes unfalsifiable; if the guy denies it, he's just doing exactly what Cornuke said he would which doesn't prove Cornuke wrong in any way. The only one who said Cornuke was lying was the guy Cornuke made that claim about.

[@MrThatWatchman]

Jesus said the rebuilt temple comes from the Holy Spirit, since "we" are supposed to be the Temples for the Living God! Satan lives in a dead letter book, also a building built by human or demon hands.... Acts 7:48 However, God doesn’t live in temples made by human hands. ‘The heaven is my throne,’ says the Lord through his prophets, ‘and earth is my footstool. What kind of home could you build?’ asks the Lord. ‘Would I stay in it?

[@barneygimble8984]

@@MrThatWatchman Yep The Israel guys deny Jesus and worship roman stones placed by herod

[@Gene-kl1br]

Very enlightening !.!.!

[@loneranger1536]

It's amazing that those huge stones are still there where they fell after the Romans destroyed the temple. I didn't know about the steps leading up to the temple, two short steps and one large step. That's amazing to see that. Mind boggling.

[@Enochphilw]

Herod expanded Fort Antonia too so there are herodian stones there. Antonia completely obscured the Temple complex from the north. The romans wouldn't destroy their own barracks.

[@rjanmyhre]

@@Enochphilw Do you know more great jokes?

[@Enochphilw]

@@rjanmyhre Yes but are you entitled?

[@rjanmyhre]

@@Enochphilw entitled for what? Listen to jokes?

[@Enochphilw]

Entitled to the truth. True worship is in spirit and truth. I don't blow smoke up the ass of the general public but I might make an exception in your case.

[@kiwifruit27]

A great series, thanks. Also the ascent that is being uncovered leads to the Temple Mount

[@cindypollard7972]

I'm eager to learn more about the Mount of Olives. Jesus ascension, Bethany, etc.

[@jenniferhillman4844]

Great job guys!!! May Yah bless you for defending the Temple Mount.

[@josiahhilton]

👏💪

[@Gr82bsaved417]

Great information!! Satan is putting up a fight for the area for a reason!

[@goinghome1191]

You guys have confirmed for me what I had been suspecting, that the temple was right there. Thank you and God bless!

[@rogerduhaime1476]

Read Matthew 24:2 and guess again.

[@goinghome1191]

@@rogerduhaime1476 it's ok if you have a different opinion, it doesn't really change anything either way. Have a great week!

[@barneygimble8984]

At 8:08 THIS IS AN ASSUMPTION this is the temple mount

[@goinghome1191]

@@barneygimble8984 that is indeed a compelling statement my friend 👍

[@daliafel2020]

@@barneygimble8984 listen to it again yourself please... he stated that "the pieces" not that "the temple" itself itself is not.

[@charleshenderson1174]

Thanks guys

[@markhuebner7580]

Thanks! Great show!

[@rosiefrederick6403]

Loved your presentation. Would have been recieved by more people if you spent a little more time on more artifacts found in the siftings. Thank you for the info on corner of wall with trumpeter info on it!

[@lukehereiam9188]

Well done.

[@willcd]

Do you guys know where this is? There was also an occult passage built for the king; it led from Antonia to the inner temple, at its eastern gate; over which he also erected for himself a tower, that he might have the opportunity of a subterraneous ascent to the temple, in order to guard against any sedition which might be made by the people against their kings. Flavius Josephus and William Whiston, The Works of Josephus: Complete and Unabridged (Peabody: Hendrickson, 1987), 425.

[@youtubesux6361]

The stair theory is tosh. Castle stairs were often off pace to keep new comers unsteady and the regulars faster. I do agree with you as far as the location of the temple

[@Gailafathersjoy]

Where was the Tabernacle's (tent) location, before the temple was built? Maybe those grooves found in the city of David are from the tabernacle. Does anyone know the tabernacles location ?

[@wizzardofpaws2420]

I think who ever started the lie about the temple being located somewhere else is trying hard to get the third temple built.

[@Enochphilw]

Remember, Josephus wrote that Ft. Antonia completely obscured the temple complex from the north.

[@paulawallace8784]

''AND SOLOMON COMMENCED TO BUILD THE HOUSE OF THE LRD IN JERUSALEM ON MOUNT MORIAH" Divrei Hayamim II - II Chronicles - Chapter 3: 1And Solomon commenced to build the House of the Lord in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah, where He had appeared to his father David, which he had prepared in David's place, in the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite. אוַיָּ֣חֶל שְׁלֹמֹ֗ה לִבְנ֚וֹת אֶת־בֵּֽית־יְהֹוָה֙ בִּירֽוּשָׁלִַ֔ם בְּהַר֙ הַמּ֣וֹרִיָּ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר נִרְאָ֖ה לְדָוִ֣יד אָבִ֑יהוּ אֲשֶׁ֚ר הֵכִין֙ בִּמְק֣וֹם דָּוִ֔יד בְּגֹ֖רֶן אָרְנָ֥ן הַיְבוּסִֽי:

[@Enochphilw]

Many modern day Christians and Jews still call Josephus a liar.

[@Enochphilw]

They're deleting my posts.

[@paulawallace8784]

Soon David's Shoot will come build the Temple on Gd's Mountain Moriah: Yeshayahu - Isaiah - Chapter 2: 2And it shall be at the end of the days, that the mountain of the Lord's house shall be firmly established at the top of the mountains, and it shall be raised above the hills, and all the nations shall stream to it. בוְהָיָ֣ה | בְּאַֽחֲרִ֣ית הַיָּמִ֗ים נָכ֨וֹן יִֽהְיֶ֜ה הַ֚ר בֵּֽית־יְהֹוָה֙ בְּרֹ֣אשׁ הֶהָרִ֔ים וְנִשָּׂ֖א מִגְּבָע֑וֹת וְנָֽהֲר֥וּ אֵלָ֖יו כָּל־הַגּוֹיִֽם

[@darrenwolboldtalk2]

@@paulawallace8784 so why is the "temple mount" in outside of zion then ? its down by the stream as the temple needed flowing water even found the tent pole holes and old alter

[@spitfirered]

This Is Truly Amazing News!

[@WildwoodCastle]

I agree that the Temple was on the mount.. under the Al-Aqsa Mosque... Search 'Locating Solomon's Temple' by Norma Robertson

[@glennmiller7596]

Are you sure it wasn’t where the Dome of the Rock sits?

[@WildwoodCastle]

@@glennmiller7596 I invite you to go to 'Locating Solomon's Temple' and study the entire presentation... Then make up your own mind... Be fair and study all of the presentation without prejudice...

[@paulawallace8784]

@@WildwoodCastle The Foundation Stone that the Ark was placed upon lies under the Dome, not Al-Asqa.

[@paulawallace8784]

@@glennmiller7596 Yes, that's where the Foundation Stone lies.

[@WildwoodCastle]

@@paulawallace8784 How do you know that is correct..?

[@777Outrigger]

An archaeological discovery gives weight to the City of David Temple location. The ring of an official named Nathan-meleck was discovered in an area where the West Gate would be if the Temple was indeed in the City of David. Why is this significant? Because Nathan-meleck is mentioned in 2 Kings 23; 11. It mentions "the chamber of Nathan-meleck the official which was in the precincts". "Precincts" was translated from the word Parbar, and we know from I Chronicles 26;18 that Parbar is at the Western entrance to the Temple. So Nathan-meleck's chambers were at the Parbar at the Western Gate of the Temple and his ring was found in the City of David where the Temple West Gate would be...

[@bryansidders982]

Hi your message was not clear. I still dont know if the top where the Mosque sits is the original Temple site - or below the Flat top or traditional site ?

[@TheRight-handedStranger]

Thank you and Shana Tova

[@stephenrobbins6353]

Every time man thinks we know exactly something, God does something unexpected to prove we really don't "know" anything and that He id God. We will see what He brings about

[@mikejurney9102]

Trinkets and block??? Josephus writes about how ancient structures were cut down and the debris was used as landfill in other areas. So trinkets could have come from anywhere and moved to other areas; they don't mean anything. Likewise Josephus writes about how the block from the temple were carried off and used for other structures. So we don't know the original location of any loose blocks we might find; they don't mean anything either.

[@karinkarger8726]

How about loose seals belonging to priests? By name yet?

[@mikejurney9102]

@@karinkarger8726 Those are interesting. They help confirm the existence of those priests. But it really says nothing about where the temples were built. You need to find immovable archeological objects to give evidence of where the temple was built, like Hezekiah's tunnel, or maybe some reliable historical documents that specify the location with respect to places we can presently identify.

[@annemurphy9339]

@@mikejurney9102 Don’t you find it rather amazing all these artifacts got up and walked over to the same location?

[@mustangdru]

@@karinkarger8726 kzbin.info/www/bejne/oqiYYZxvl9mCaas

[@karinkarger8726]

Priestly seals verifying Hebrew and Biblical priest names...under the Temple Mount. How abnormal! Not!

[@noryk6237]

My children found fossilized butterfly's eggs, tiny mammal bones, and sea shells in our backyard. We have bitumen, clay, and obsidian as well. After a long winter, a pond is formed every year behind my backyard and sulfur smell comes out of it through bubbles. Many creatures live in this reserve, about 50 species of birds, thousands kinds of insects, and we have mammals and critters too. We don't know why this reserve is what it is because no government neither natural science authority has declared or assigned, or confirmed identification of the place. Same way with the Ufo's, Big Foot, and the Temple Mount stories. Everyone has an opinion about the Temple Mount but the evidence is always blurry, doubtful, or discredited, always inconsistent with the character of G-d.

[@MelKali]

So I think this is such great info! … and I’m such a thinker here. What if… 🤔… the place that they found in the old city of David which is claimed to be where according to that guy was the place where they had the temporary place of worship before Solomon built the temple? … because in the Bible it does say that the Ark of the covenant was placed in an area temporarily which is why David wanted to build a permanent place for it?!?! Just here in my thoughts. Any info on this? Could y’all find out? And make a video? Unless I’ve missed it.

[@TheIsraelGuys]

That is a valid possibility, some archaeologists have proposed this I believe

[@aaroncummings2613]

Read 1 Chronicles 21-22 and 2 Chronicles 3 and you will see that Solomon built his temple on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebustie which is in the City Of David

[@rjanmyhre]

@@aaroncummings2613 How do you know it was in the city of David? Have you seen the Temple in scale in the city of David?

[@aaroncummings2613]

@@rjanmyhre because it clearly says that in 1 Chronicles 21:22

[@aaroncummings2613]

@@rjanmyhre couple that with 2 Chronicles 3:1

[@garymoses1165]

Great information, thanks!

[@TheIsraelGuys]

Glad it was helpful!

[@RahelSings]

Excellent as always

[@TheIsraelGuys]

Glad you think so!

[@AdithiaKusno]

Why there is no mention in Midrash about the temple from 1,800 BC to 800 BC until the time of King Hezekiah? Could that be the actual place for the 1st Temple?

[@paulawallace8784]

''AND SOLOMON COMMENCED TO BUILD THE HOUSE OF THE LRD IN JERUSALEM ON MOUNT MORIAH" Divrei Hayamim II - II Chronicles - Chapter 3: 1And Solomon commenced to build the House of the Lord in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah, where He had appeared to his father David, which he had prepared in David's place, in the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite. אוַיָּ֣חֶל שְׁלֹמֹ֗ה לִבְנ֚וֹת אֶת־בֵּֽית־יְהֹוָה֙ בִּירֽוּשָׁלִַ֔ם בְּהַר֙ הַמּ֣וֹרִיָּ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר נִרְאָ֖ה לְדָוִ֣יד אָבִ֑יהוּ אֲשֶׁ֚ר הֵכִין֙ בִּמְק֣וֹם דָּוִ֔יד בְּגֹ֖רֶן אָרְנָ֥ן הַיְבוּסִֽי:

[@sydfreed9818]

It shouldn't really matter because when Jesus comes back to judge the earth and destroy his enemies and set up his kingdom you will know then without any doubts because he is the God of the old and new testament.

[@ac7160]

It matters because The 3rd Temple would be in the SAME place where the other 2 Temples stood 🙄. There is ONLY ONE PLACE that God chose to put His Name, that’s why is called HaMakom!!

[@Theaddekalk]

that the temple would be in city of david and not on the temple mount is just so weird for me

[@elibennett6168]

I'm curious why?

[@Theaddekalk]

@@elibennett6168 Because there is so much that just doesnt fit an go against it. i can understand somehow but even archeology go against it, and thats not the onyl thing

[@rogerduhaime1476]

Matthew 24:2 But He responded and said to the, "Do you not see all these things? Truly I say to you, not one stone here will be left upon another, which will not be torn down. Now either you don't understand what Josephus said or someone is lying! And as Yahshua can not lie.... Well! My point is that you have an entire wailing wall that you tell me has been standing since that time. And when Yahshua HaMashiach speaks and has it recorded for us, you can take that to the bank. Not one stone upon another, not except for this wall! No; Not one stone upon another.

[@Setfree60]

Your interesting point !

[@reneelapenna6289]

Go watch their other video about this. There are other Herodian era walls in Jerusalem still standing. Even a wall from Hezekiah's time. So either Jesus was lying when he said no stone left on top of another, or he was walking about the Temple itself (which was what the disciples had just asked him about). There are zero stones standing on top of each other from the temple. The retaining wall of the Temple Mount is not the Temple.

[@jeffreyhutton8283]

In the Holy Bible Matt24;2 Jesus does say all the buildings will be demolished not one stone will be upon another. Another words the buildings were destroyed and some of the upper parts of the Jerusalem wall was torn down but later rebuilt.

[@lalaLAX219]

What about the two connected colonnades Josephus described being attached to the Temple from the Antonia fortress? Couldn’t this be the “fast” access Josephus was referring to?

[@TheIsraelGuys]

The colonnades are a bit of a myth

[@francisbusa1074]

The late Israeli archeologist, Eilat Mazar, has presented lots of evidence that the First and possibly the Second Temples, were built in the City of David, and that the tombs of the kings of Judah which were nearby, were destroyed. It's actually quite compelling if you examine the archeological evidence along with what the scriptures say.

[@JaneH3675]

2nd Chronicles 3:1 . .tells you exactly where the temple was built.

[@prvbs31mama]

VERY good point!!!!!!!

[@charleshurdle7010]

What did Jesus say, Matthew 24 chapter, did he tell the truth?

[@ScottWood-b9v]

Is it possible that the temple of David was built in the city of David and Harrods temple on the temple mount?

[@mustangdru]

I just hear a lot of it must be and not here is why. I don't have a horse in the game but it's obvious the only thing you have to go off of is "Tradition". Tradition based off experiences from hundreds of years after the Temple stood. Trumpeting Stone could have been on the 600ft walkway between FT Antonia and the Temple. The stairs? If it was Ft Antonia It would have needed stairs too. The Living Water Source to the Temple is non existent until Harods time when the Roman's built an Aqueduct from Solomons Pool. Do you honestly believe the Roman's built an Aqueduct to the Temple out of the kindness of their hearts? Or was that water for their fort? Think about it. Common sense. I'm not saying the Temple was, or was not, on the Temple Mount. Simply that you have provided no evidence it was. Just repeating it was and saying Tradition says over and over does not suffice.

[@christopherscallio2539]

The Currently known area called Temple Mount (Fort of Antonia) is North of the Old City. The Temple is South of the "Temple Mount." The only Area that has No Building Development in Jerusalem.

[@paulawallace8784]

''AND SOLOMON COMMENCED TO BUILD THE HOUSE OF THE LRD IN JERUSALEM ON MOUNT MORIAH" Divrei Hayamim II - II Chronicles - Chapter 3: 1And Solomon commenced to build the House of the Lord in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah, where He had appeared to his father David, which he had prepared in David's place, in the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite. אוַיָּ֣חֶל שְׁלֹמֹ֗ה לִבְנ֚וֹת אֶת־בֵּֽית־יְהֹוָה֙ בִּירֽוּשָׁלִַ֔ם בְּהַר֙ הַמּ֣וֹרִיָּ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר נִרְאָ֖ה לְדָוִ֣יד אָבִ֑יהוּ אֲשֶׁ֚ר הֵכִין֙ בִּמְק֣וֹם דָּוִ֔יד בְּגֹ֖רֶן אָרְנָ֥ן הַיְבוּסִֽי:

[@christopherscallio2539]

@@paulawallace8784 Yes Scripture is Truth. I Question that Mount Moriah is Where it is Claimed to be Today. Which would be Outside of the Old City. I lean toward the two ancient records that Mount Moriah was Razed Down Into the Valley Side? This House that Solomon Commenced to Build was in Jerusalem as this Scripture clearly reads. Today's so called Temple Mount would have been Outside of Jerusalem in Solomon's Day. And as Ornan was a Jebusite. I Contend that His Threshing Floor was most likely within the City of Jebus. Or City of David, or Jerusalem and not Outside the City at the so called Temple Mount. Although Ornan may have Owned Land Outside the City. This verse can help your view without Historical context or help my view with Historical context. Yehovah said a few times that He would pick a City to Place His Name. Yehovah. So clearly it would be a Place that was already established as a City. And Not Outside of a City. Inside the Old City, Gihon Spring would be at a Perfect Location if the Temple was South of the so called Temple Mount. Temple Needs Running "Living" Water as Commanded. I Doubt that they Pumped the Water Uphill to the so called Temple Mount. Clearly One Stone still remains upon another at the so called Temple Mount Foundations. Nothing stands in the way of Rebuilding on the Correct Site but Stubborn Tradition. Like the Stubborn Tradition that 3 Days & 3 Nights are an Evening Day & Evening of less than 36 hours. or the Stubborn Tradition that a Clear Command from the Fiery, Smoking, Quaking Mount of Shofar Shout that Grew Exceeding Loud was Unclearly Changed by Tradition & Not Command from Sabbath to Sunday. I'm willing to learn back to Your view if Evidence can Bring Me Back. Convince Me Brother. This Topic Needs Discussion to Bring Us to Truth.

[@Bellthorian]

Question, there is a third site for the temple that is in the Jewish quarter. It is based off the claim that the Torah niche's in a synagogue are supposed to be pointing to the holy of holies. Surviving first century synagogues all have their Torah niche's aligned with a spot in the Jewish quarter. I would be interested to hear your opinions.

[@MrThatWatchman]

*For the Synagogue of Satan?* Jesus said the rebuilt temple comes from the Holy Spirit, since "we" are supposed to be the Temples for the Living God! Satan lives in a dead letter book, also a building built by human or demon hands.... Acts 7:48 However, God doesn’t live in temples made by human hands. ‘The heaven is my throne,’ says the Lord through his prophets, ‘and earth is my footstool. What kind of home could you build?’ asks the Lord. ‘Would I stay in it?

[@paulawallace8784]

@@MrThatWatchman 'AND IT SHALL BE AT THE END OF THE DAYS, THAT THE MOUNTAIN OF THE LRD'S HOUSE SHALL BE FIRMLY ESTABLISHED....ALL THE NATIONS SHALL STREAM TO IT." Yeshayahu - Isaiah - Chapter 2: 2And it shall be at the end of the days, that the mountain of the Lord's house shall be firmly established at the top of the mountains, and it shall be raised above the hills, and all the nations shall stream to it. בוְהָיָ֣ה | בְּאַֽחֲרִ֣ית הַיָּמִ֗ים נָכ֨וֹן יִֽהְיֶ֜ה הַ֚ר בֵּֽית־יְהֹוָה֙ בְּרֹ֣אשׁ הֶהָרִ֔ים וְנִשָּׂ֖א מִגְּבָע֑וֹת וְנָֽהֲר֥וּ אֵלָ֖יו כָּל־הַגּוֹיִֽם:

[@stevenklinkhamer9069]

You'll get no argument from this sports fan. Points well taken. Case closed its sounds like. Another excellent presentation.👍

[@romanarmendariz4351]

That Cornuke's teory about Holy Temple location makes non sense at all. I don't know why they keep pulling it. The Holy Temple of YHVH always goes AT the Temple Mount absolutely.

[@tonygarcia0072]

Although I am in agreement that the temple was situated on the temple mount, I am not convinced that the location of the "trumpeting" stone or any of the other stones lying at the foot of the temple mount can be used as evidence; The romans supposedly destroyed the site containing caves claimed to be the tombs of the Davidic dynasty by quarrying it to build Aeolia Capitalina, they would not likely ignore a source of stones closer to hand such as those at the foot of the wall. I think it is more likely that these stones were repurposed, and fell during a later earthquake. I seem to recall a story that there was an earlier attempt to rebuild the temple, and an earthquake overthrew the stones they had already raised...

[@rhodeehernandez926]

I was thinking about those rocks too...sounds like a conspiracy....looks like those rocks were placed there, so we tourist will have something to look at and marvel...maybe? Shouldn't the rocks be underneath the ground? The future temple will be demonic and will be place on that mount, not on God's holy place...which may be in the city of David...just a thought. Come Lord Jesus!

[@bobbieleland7687]

The Bible says, the guards walked down while Peter was getting beat.

[@speaktruth9313]

The floor tile looks like Amish quilts… have always wondered if there is a lost tribe in the anabaptist community…

[@shainazion4073]

Look up *Norma Robertson* KZbin channel. She does a walk through of the Jewish Temple.

[@norminatorrr]

You said, “It’s not a theory….” Even the expert flinched when you said that.

[@MrThatWatchman]

Jesus said the rebuilt temple comes from the Holy Spirit, since "we" are supposed to be the Temples for the Living God! Satan lives in a dead letter book, also a building built by human or demon hands.... Acts 7:48 However, God doesn’t live in temples made by human hands. ‘The heaven is my throne,’ says the Lord through his prophets, ‘and earth is my footstool. What kind of home could you build?’ asks the Lord. ‘Would I stay in it?

[@rjanmyhre]

@@MrThatWatchman what are you trying to communicate? You are just as a webtroll you just ignore people's response to you and you claim all this nonsense which has nothing to do with the content or not even what this video communicates. It seems like you are the only one who gets it but what your really are showing is that your a Biblical illiterate. You use the Scripture like a drunk uses a lamp post, for support rather than illumination. Now go study

[@MrThatWatchman]

@@rjanmyhre Satan had to have a weapon, something people falsely considered "Holy", something preceived as sacred, to combat the Holy Ghost. This is why Satan had bibles made up by his rulers as a device to control the people by the old covenant principle of ruling by the written law, which was done away in Christ. The letter kills but the spirit gives life. People of this time are controlled by the bible instead of the Holy Ghost If you are under the control of the bible then you are controlled by Satan. Satan uses the scriptures, the old covenant to deceive the whole world. Satan uses the bible, because he can’t get control over people that have the Holy Ghost, but he can control them with Bibles.

[@SpotterVideo]

What did the first century witnesses say? In the writings of the Roman Historian Tacitus below he said a “spring of never-failing water” came out of the Jewish temple. (The Jews Book Five (1-13) of The Histories by Tacitus ) 12. The Temple was like a citadel and had its own walls, which had been even more laboriously and skilfully constructed than the rest. The porticoes around it constituted in themselves an excellent defensive position. To these advantages must be added a spring of never-failing water, chambers cut in the living rock, and tanks and cisterns for the storage of rainwater. Its builders had foreseen only too well that the strange practices of the Jews would lead to continual fighting. Hence everything was available for a siege, however long. Moreover, after Pompey's capture of Jerusalem, fear and experience taught them many lessons. So taking advantage of the money-grubbing instincts of the Claudian period, they purchased permission to fortify the city, and in the days of peace built walls meant for war. Already the home of a motley concourse, its population had been swollen by the fall of the other Jewish cities, for the most determined partisan leaders escaped to the capital, and thereby added to the turmoil. There were three different leaders and three armies. The long outer perimeter of the walls was held by Simon, the central part of the city by John, and the Temple by Eleazar. John and Simon could rely on numbers and equipment, Eleazar on his strategic position. But it was upon each other that they turned the weapons of battle, ambush and fire, and great stocks of corn went up in flames. Then John sent off a party of men, ostensibly to offer sacrifice but in reality to cut Eleazar and his followers to pieces, thus gaining possession of the Temple. Hence-forward, therefore, Jerusalem was divided between two factions, until, on the approach of the Romans, fighting the foreigner healed the breach between them. In the passage below we find Titus used Fort Antonia as his base of operations on the day the temple was burned during 70 AD. They had previously gained access to the temple by attacking the foundation of Antonia for seven days. (Book 6, Chapter 2, Section 7) This passage proves at least part of Fort Antonia remained intact on the day the Jewish temple was destroyed. From War of the Jews, by Josephus, Book 6, Chapter 4, sections 4-5. "4. Now it is true that on this day the Jews were so weary, and under such consternation, that they refrained from any attacks. But on the next day they gathered their whole force together, and ran upon those that guarded the outward court of the temple very boldly, through the east gate, and this about the second hour of the day. These guards received that their attack with great bravery, and by covering themselves with their shields before, as if it were with a wall, they drew their squadron close together; yet was it evident that they could not abide there very long, but would be overborne by the multitude of those that sallied out upon them, and by the heat of their passion. However, Caesar seeing, from the tower of Antonia, that this squadron was likely to give way, he sent some chosen horsemen to support them. Hereupon the Jews found themselves not able to sustain their onset, and upon the slaughter of those in the forefront, many of the rest were put to flight. But as the Romans were going off, the Jews turned upon them, and fought them; and as those Romans came back upon them, they retreated again, until about the fifth hour of the day they were overborne, and shut themselves up in the inner [court of the] temple. 5. So Titus retired into the tower of Antonia, and resolved to storm the temple the next day, early in the morning, with his whole army, and to encamp round about the holy house. But as for that house, God had, for certain, long ago doomed it to the fire; and now that fatal day was come, according to the revolution of ages; it was the tenth day of the month Lous, [Ab,] upon which it was formerly burnt by the king of Babylon; although these flames took their rise from the Jews themselves, and were occasioned by them; for upon Titus’s retiring, the seditious lay still for a little while, and then attacked the Romans again, when those that guarded the holy house fought with those that quenched the fire that was burning the inner [court of the] temple; but these Romans put the Jews to flight, and proceeded as far as the holy house itself. At which time one of the soldiers, without staying for any orders, and without any concern or dread upon him at so great an undertaking, and being hurried on by a certain divine fury, snatched somewhat out of the materials that were on fire, and being lifted up by another soldier, he set fire to a golden window, through which there was a passage to the rooms that were round about the holy house, on the north side of it. As the flames went upward, the Jews made a great clamor, such as so mighty an affliction required, and ran together to prevent it; and now they spared not their lives any longer, nor suffered any thing to restrain their force, since that holy house was perishing, for whose sake it was that they kept such a guard about it." Why was Solomon anointed king of Israel in Gihon? 1Ki_1:38 So Zadok the priest, and Nathan the prophet, and Benaiah the son of Jehoiada, and the Cherethites, and the Pelethites, went down, and caused Solomon to ride upon king David's mule, and brought him to Gihon. 1Ki_1:45 And Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet have anointed him king in Gihon: and they are come up from thence rejoicing, so that the city rang again. This is the noise that ye have heard. 2Ch_32:30 This same Hezekiah also stopped the upper watercourse of Gihon, and brought it straight down to the west side of the city of David. And Hezekiah prospered in all his works. All of this provides tremendous evidence that the Dome of the Rock is the true location of Fort Antonia. Josephus said Fort Antonia was built upon a gigantic rock, and that rock is still there today.

[@aaroncummings2613]

Great research and commentary 1 Chronicles 21-22. 2 Chronicles 3 clearly states that Solomon built the House of the LORD on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite in the City Of David

[@timm2020]

Can I go and sift through the dirt for artifacts? Is it open to the public?

[@jonrunningbear8206]

Also Paul was taken by roman guards up stairs and he stopped and spoke to the crowds so the fort was the temple mount

[@carlthornton3076]

Very Good!... #257 ✝ {9-30-2022}

[@sar8349]

Why the dispute? Isaiah 14:12-14 “How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn!
How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low!
 You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; above the stars of God
I will set my throne on high; I will sit on the mount of assembly in the far reaches of the north; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.’ I will sit on the mount of assembly - assembly = moed. The mountain where YHVH proclaimed His holy days would be celebrated is the target of the adversary to make himself like the Most High. As the time draws near for the new earth and heavens to be established, the adversary will use great deceptions on covenant believers and cause them to believe the lie.

[@bigbellyjack]

Even the Kaaba in Mecca, Islam's holiest site, was once a Hindu Shiva temple.

[@bigbellyjack]

@@mattr.1310 There are plenty of articles available on the internet that mentions this. I heard it long before the existence of the internet whilst living in India. Also, there are many examples of Hindu temples in India taken over and converted into mosques. One of them is no other than the Taj Mahal itself. I think my topic relates very much to this video and to the subject in general which will become more apparent in the next episode.

[@bigbellyjack]

@@mattr.1310 Called originally Tej-o-Mahalaya, signifying a Shiva temple, is what Shahjahan converted to Taj Mahal. The Moguls whilst conquering India were so envious of Hindu Vedic places of worship they either destroyed or commandeered them by force.

[@sciencescholar3440]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@Redarmor333]

So I'm watching this video nine months later. And my question is with all this evidence why won't they go ahead and build the new Temple?

[@Martraul-CoramDeo]

Yes the Temple stood on the Mount but not on the location where the current mosque is stationed. The Golden Gate entrance should be in direct line with the Temple entrance, the Muslim mosque does not fit the puzzle . Follow the line from the Golden Gate and it will lead to the Holy Place.

[@richardfetzer4933]

I think the blocks that were thrown off the mount, could all be 3D scanned and by an AI see if the temple could be reconstructed, or parts of it. Would you refuse permission to move broken stone around a little to get a good scan, if that proof might be that critical? It's time.

[@michaelsekich5974]

For sure without a doubt?

[@annacorts8609]

🤔Stairs? I know that there was a ramp on the side, it would be difficult for many to go to the top by just climbing stairs.

[@TheIsraelGuys]

The stairs are still there, you can see many of the original stones

[@ac7160]

They didn’t have elevators, there were even “stairs” in the pyramids. They used a ramp for the Altar so the priest won’t be exposing themselves while going up the STAIRS!! That’s why the way the stairs were built, one big and two short ones. Have you ever visit it??

[@brucekaplan6124]

I believe the stairs they are showing are on the South side of the Temple Mount. The stairs lead to a set of large openings that have been sealed off, but you can still clearly see the outlines.

[@richgeshel8735]

The stairs... how do you account for Saul being brought UP from the temple to the Roman Fortress by Legionnaires, for his protection, when he was threatened with death by the Temple Guards? (Acts 21:31-37). He was brought UP, the soldiers carrying him UP. Fortress Antonia is NOT the Temple area. It measures 35 acres, one short of the nominal 36 acres a typical Roman Fortress encompassed based upon remnants found in multiple areas around Europe.

[@TheIsraelGuys]

The Antonia was a tower, of course there would be stairs. This isn't a problem for the traditional site

[@paulawallace8784]

'AND SOLOMON COMMENCED TO BUILD THE HOUSE OF THE LRD IN JERUSALEM ON MOUNT MORIAH" Divrei Hayamim II - II Chronicles - Chapter 3: 1And Solomon commenced to build the House of the Lord in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah, where He had appeared to his father David, which he had prepared in David's place, in the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite. אוַיָּ֣חֶל שְׁלֹמֹ֗ה לִבְנ֚וֹת אֶת־בֵּֽית־יְהֹוָה֙ בִּירֽוּשָׁלִַ֔ם בְּהַר֙ הַמּ֣וֹרִיָּ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר נִרְאָ֖ה לְדָוִ֣יד אָבִ֑יהוּ אֲשֶׁ֚ר הֵכִין֙ בִּמְק֣וֹם דָּוִ֔יד בְּגֹ֖רֶן אָרְנָ֥ן הַיְבוּסִֽי:

[@bertlorenz4203]

Good job with keeping the discussion going! The City of David temple location does not make sense. However, if you consider a Jewish Quarter temple site, those huge stones most likely just rolled down the hill during the destruction and ended up in that location after colliding into the Roman fortress wall.

[@lalaLAX219]

If the western wall is part of the temple, where are the Solomonic stones?

[@PADARM]

they are on the opposite side of the Western Wall facing Kidrom Valley. Watch the video called: Must See New Evidence that Proves the Temple was on the Temple Mount Over the Dome of the Rock!

[@Enochphilw]

PRAY FOR THE PEACE OF JERUSALEM, not for WW III.

[@natf5869]

What's the covered door way in the corner ?

[@elibennett6168]

I find Shukron's statement that there is no evidence bizarre. The city of David has temple zero. They have found the greek Acra that was built along side and overlooking the temple. They have the stepped stone structure that supported a monumental building. They have remains of a monumental building above this area that have only been interpreted as David's palace, not proven. Eilat Mazar herself speculated it could be an "unknown" temple. Below this building they found a Phoenician capital that could just as easily be interpreted as attached to the temple (stonecutters from Hiram of Tyre). They have various bullae, including the seal of Natan-Melech who lived at a temple entrance. I won't go on for sake of brevity, but these counter Shukron's claim of no evidence. The stairs below the Haram can very well be interpreted as the same stairs that Paul made his famous speech upon before he was brought into Antonia. We know from the scripture that this was outside the temple gates (they were shut once he was hustled out to be stoned). The model of Antonia shows no steps at all that the Romans could run down but be outside the temple gates. Of course there would be platform for speaking (as we see in the ruins). There had to be enough space for a crowd to gather to hear him. Given that Herod both built the temple (from the foundation up) and repaired and expanded Antonia, we would of course see similar archaeological elements. One of the problems with the temple mount sifting project is that the dirt was not found in situ, but layers were mixed and dumped over several years. As an aside, it would not be unexpected to see priest's seals in Antonia because we are told by Josephus that the fort was used for storage under the priest's seal. Additionally, dirt fill used to expand it likely had remnants of pottery, bones etc. (see what filled up the subterranean pool at the Gihon spring - lots of pottery, bones, very common to find it in rubble fill). Additionally, we know that the Haram had extensive work done during Roman, Crusader, and Muslim periods - rebuilding walls and platforms etc. They could very easily have taken dirt from a destruction layer and moved it there for fill. LOL - the archaeologist says we assume they are from the temple because they come from the temple period, and then one of the interviews says. "It's not a theory, we're talking facts". That is interpretive bias. A good interviewer would have probed the assumptions that the archaeologist uses to interpret - a word carefully chosen to describe the situation. He also made it clear they are a "basis for discussion". I have my own thoughts about the trumpeting stone (again we know Antonia was used for storage) but, suffice it to say that the latest theory is that the stones that archaeologists claim were thrown down form the temple mount may be better explained by an earthquake much later in history - why they are still in situ. You can read about Shimon Gibson's theory on this. I don't insist the City of David theory is correct, just that there is much more to the story than portrayed. There are some things hidden about Zion, whispering from the dust (Isaiah 29).

[@barriesmith3489]

Like the red heifers that many are raving about it is not that important the new temple that we will next have will be for the anti christ interesting but not important for salvation

[@elibennett6168]

@@barriesmith3489 Agreed that these things are not salvation issues. But I don't think the temple will be FOR the AC; rather he takes it over and defiles it with an idol. You cannot defile something that isn't holy. Likewise, the last temple was built from the foundations up by Herod the Great, who tried to kill Jesus. When Jesus gave the parable of the 10 minas, it is understood that the king that went off to a foreign land to be made king (Rome) was Herod. From the temple they likely could see Herodian, which Herod built in part to commemorate where he conquered the Jewish nation, delivering the nation to Rome that would end up killing so many millions. It is funny to me when Christians defend Herodian stones left one atop another at the Haram as if this is something good. It's the work of the man that tried to stop salvation from reaching the world. When Jesus said the temple and Jerusalem would be laid bare to the ground, I believe it. He wept over what he knew was coming and Jerusalem is still the apple of God's eye.

[@annemurphy9339]

@@barriesmith3489 The Bible calls the third temple the temple of God: if it were being intentionally built for the antichrist or for any evil, then it would be an inherently evil thing and not able to ‘become defiled’ as scripture says this temple will be. Religious Jews honestly do not believe that Yeshua is ha’Mashiach, & although they realize something is missing, in error they think it is that they have no temple in which to practice Judaism as given in Torah. They don’t realize there is now no access to the Father except through the Son. The abomination of desolation will be an event, I believe, that YHVH will use to open many blinded eyes.

[@JamesThomas-dn6hz]

Well said. I appreciate the attempts made by these two but we are discussing a city that has been occupied for almost 4000 years and has been destroyed, rebuilt and inhabited by so many different people. To say I found this here, so that means all this, is just straight foolishness. Now, all this is fun.....but what does the Bible say

[@yamyam2987]

Anyone pointing that the temples are on the other place beside on top of the Temple Mount complex is a fool

[@Ohios1Cheesehead]

It's lack of faith that allows alternate site viewpoints. If you see the dome of the rock or the mosque as problems you don't know God...

[@mustangdru]

How's that a lack of faith? The Bible tells you were it is located. To just follow tradition over the Bible... THAT'S a lack of faith.

[@sandyharman5067]

There is a third location. Not in the city of David, but on the mt to the west of the temple mt. Old pictures prior to israel rebirth, show it as the sight of the temple

[@charlesstuart846]

I have entered through the wooden bridge to the traditional temple mount, walked through the plaza, seen the blockup Eastern Gate. Seen the stones at the bottom that the Israeli Guys suggest are remains from the second temple but everything indicates no threshing floors but instead the remains shows 36 acres of the ruins of the Antonia Fortress. There are walkways for soldiers next to the walls, stables and trails for horses. The plaza is not flat it has slopes and trees everywhere. The feel one gets when looking down at the blockup Eastern Gate from the top of the mount is that One is inside a military Fortress not on top of Mount Zoriah. Another feeling one gets up there is Pure Evil, the hatred directed toward us from Muslim visiting the Dome of the Rock is real, this place has no feeling of being or ever having been holy or ever could be holy ground.

[@paulawallace8784]

''AND SOLOMON COMMENCED TO BUILD THE HOUSE OF THE LRD IN JERUSALEM ON MOUNT MORIAH" Divrei Hayamim II - II Chronicles - Chapter 3: 1And Solomon commenced to build the House of the Lord in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah, where He had appeared to his father David, which he had prepared in David's place, in the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite. אוַיָּ֣חֶל שְׁלֹמֹ֗ה לִבְנ֚וֹת אֶת־בֵּֽית־יְהֹוָה֙ בִּירֽוּשָׁלִַ֔ם בְּהַר֙ הַמּ֣וֹרִיָּ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר נִרְאָ֖ה לְדָוִ֣יד אָבִ֑יהוּ אֲשֶׁ֚ר הֵכִין֙ בִּמְק֣וֹם דָּוִ֔יד בְּגֹ֖רֶן אָרְנָ֥ן הַיְבוּסִֽי:

[@russberg900]

So when is the third temple going to be built?

[@paulawallace8784]

At the End of the Days, just as Isaiah prophesied.

[@russberg900]

@@paulawallace8784 But how soon?

[@paulawallace8784]

@@russberg900 One indication of the coming of David's Shoot is that Gd first sends Elijah to come and Undo all Division in the Family Fostered by False Teachers.

[@russberg900]

@@paulawallace8784 but do they have a timeline when construction will begin on the temple?

[@paulawallace8784]

@@russberg900 The Moshiach will be build the Temple, he comes at the End of the Days, just as Scripture tells.

[@jvlp2046]

Normally, the People have to Build or Purchase the HOUSE first, before procuring the requirements inside the house such as furniture, appliances, curtains, lighting, and plumbing fixtures, etc... In Jerusalem, Israel the Jews had already prepared all the requirements needed for the 3rd Temple, such as the Red Heifers (Cows as sacrifices), Standard Clothes of the High Priest, Silver Utensils, Temple's Traditional Instruments, Jewish Candlestands (Menorah), the Holy Scriptures Written in Scrolls (Books of Torah and Tanakh), including the Temple Plans, Scaled Building Model, etc... except for the Actual Physical Building itself... Ironically, the 3rd Stonewall Temple is nowhere to be found... Not yet built and still debating and negotiating up to now where EXACTLY the location of the 2nd Temple that was completely and totally destroyed except for the gate walls (obviously) in around 70 A.D... Christ said, "NOT ONE (TEMPLE) STONE WILL BE LEFT UNTURNED." ...(Luke 21:6)... "NO TRACES" found? That this means that God does not really want the 3rd Temple to be REBUILT for God does not want any more animal sacrifices after His own Son's Sacrificial Death on the Cross and Resurrection had already been fulfilled (Finished)?...

[@paulawallace8784]

''AND IT SHALL BE AT THE END OF THE DAYS, THAT THE MOUNTAIN OF THE LRD'S HOUSE SHALL BE FIRMLY ESTABLISHED....ALL THE NATIONS SHALL STREAM TO IT." Yeshayahu - Isaiah - Chapter 2: 2And it shall be at the end of the days, that the mountain of the Lord's house shall be firmly established at the top of the mountains, and it shall be raised above the hills, and all the nations shall stream to it. בוְהָיָ֣ה | בְּאַֽחֲרִ֣ית הַיָּמִ֗ים נָכ֨וֹן יִֽהְיֶ֜ה הַ֚ר בֵּֽית־יְהֹוָה֙ בְּרֹ֣אשׁ הֶהָרִ֔ים וְנִשָּׂ֖א מִגְּבָע֑וֹת וְנָֽהֲר֥וּ אֵלָ֖יו כָּל־הַגּוֹיִֽם:

[@joebarzo9935]

Posted during the Feast of Trumpets. Gentlemen...how very appropriate of you.

[@convoymaloney]

In the city of David as it says in the bible.

[@sunriserascal2755]

*Both Josephus and the Pilgrim gave the location as within the City of David, and one stadia (600 feet) BELOW the Millo, the market steps shown. *The Pool of Siloam was the people's mikveh, the ritual cleansing pool they used before walking to the temple. But if the temple was on the mount and not within the City, that means they had to walk over a sewage system WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THEM UNCLEAN. Meaning the trip to the mikveh had been a waste of time. The rabbis would have never tolerated such a farce. *There is no living water on the mount, just made-made cisterns. The only living water is the Gihon Spring, down inside the City walls and within easy reach of the actual temple location. *There were more than 10,000 Roman troops and personnel occupying Jerusalem. The only place large enough to hold them was the mount. *A standard Roman military encampment is approximately 19.5 acres in size. Which, just coincidentally, is the size of the mount. Quite the coincidence. *What people call Fort Antonia just to the north of the mount was actually the Roman military stables. *Less scientific but still very interesting, is that David's tomb lines up precisely with the City location of the Holy of Holies, and not the mount. But finally and far more important is the "why". Why are people making such a fuss over the mount? It's because of the misconception of the location of the FINAL temple. Which must be where the last 2 were. Says who, exactly? Who says that's where it HAS to go next? But the Word says something quite different in Isaiah 1:26. Which gives the location as Gilgal. Gilgal, not Jerusalem. Gilgal, where the Ark of the Covenant rested for at least 14 years at the very beginning. Gilgal, which was used repeatedly thereafter as the location for the re-cleansing and re-dedication of Israel several times over the millennia. Gilgal, that was recently located and excavated. Gilgal, which is located in an area that is undisputed as to ownership. THE LAST DAYS TEMPLE WILL BE LOCATED IN GILGAL, not Jerusalem. The Word says so.