Who Cracked the Car Windshield?

Cheryl says she sold her 1999 Isuzu to friends, but took it back when they never paid. Who cracked the windshield?
#JudgeJudy
The Original! There’s only ONE Judge Judy. Visit our website for where to watch, weekdays.
Subscribe to Judge Judy on KZbin: / @judgejudy

[@calise7988]

The defendants are ridiculous . I can already tell the type of people they are when Judge Judy asked if they made payments & the defendant said “yes we paid insurance” trying to be slick . They’re lucky that she let even let them keep it for 6 months with non-payment .

[@ransom182]

They’re trying to be slick but they don’t resize that they are too stupid to pull it off.

[@jenkinsheinrich9009]

Hello there Calise, how are you

[@lalaparis2074]

Word! Some people are so gross..

[@keyvonjackson225]

😢😂😮🎉😢😮😅😂😮😢😢🎉❤😮😢😅😮🎉😢😮😢😢😢😢😢😮😂❤😮😅😂❤❤❤🎉😢🎉😂😢🎉❤😅😮😢😅🎉😢😢🎉😢😢😢😢❤😢😢😢😮😢😂

[@Pretty_milano23]

Judge Judy teaches me life lessons to live by. When buying a car take complete pictures and possibly a video of the car. Thank you JJ!

[@theworldaccordingtoallie1176]

Me too!

[@briel7904]

Also do that on the day you move in and out of an apartment.

[@badazzbarbiePOV]

@@briel7904 and if any agreements are made verbally when a psper contract is present get it in writing and signed

[@Emilia_Inkheart]

Also when renting!!!!!!!! Rental companies will send you a bill (sometimes by mail! which can take forever to arrive)after you've already returned the car and left because they know you can't prove it. Which is why you ALWAYS take a full slow video walking around the car and pointing out any blemishes you find

[@gi_girl6117]

The more I watch judge judy the more I realize no matter how u know someone always put in writing and never trust anyone

[@jesusisc0mings00n3]

Trust but verify or document with pictures, contract etc. It really protects both sides

[@bovinityleak2066]

You only hear about about the bad ones. For all we know a million more went well but when it goes sour…. here you are. Listen to jj.

[@DivusMagus]

​@@bovinityleak2066that's probably true, but getting it in writing and teaching pictures and nothing goes wrong you waste a few minutes of time. If you don't get those things and it goes wrong you could be out of a lot more than time.

[@Elijah-bj8pv]

Yep. Whenever I give my partner money I write it down and we both sign our names 😂😂😂 I used to just write a check but that’s another story.. 😂😂😂

[@DIDYOUSEETHAT172]

100% My brother needed $30,600.00 middle last year. He called up asked if I could swing it. No problem! OK says he. Next thing my email dings with his promissory note, with a payment plan. That is all it takes.

[@jamesr1703]

I want to drive a car for free for 6 months! No car payment, no lease. That would be about $600 a WEEK at a car rental. JJ did not compensate the plaintiff for her complete loss.

[@smiley27b]

I agree, they added miles + wear & tear

[@keithwhittington1322]

That would be IF she had included it in the suit.

[@lazkid220]

That is why JJ asked what she was suing for and she said only the damage

[@anndeecosita3586]

No good deed goes unpunished

[@jeffrowisdabest]

I'm so sick of mooches like the defendants who think everything should just be handed to them.

[@LC-se8pw]

The defendants are so shady 😒

[@peacefreedom4930]

They should have had to pay for using the vehicle.

[@howlong6103]

She should have said the car mileage is increased so she should be paid for it 😅😅

[@didi012578]

Seeing that they never paid a cent for it, that doesn't sound unreasonable!😂

[@boston_breezy]

Judge Judy takes no shit. Love her

[@bandhariwickette]

I don't think the defendants should've gotten to drive a car around for six months for free but it was the plaintiff's responsibility to repossess the car after the first non payment and she didn't so it might not necessarily be fair but Judge Judy was absolutely on the law when she didn't award her compensation and this is a court of law not a court of what's "fair"~ She didn't ask for it in her case anyways, just the value of the car~

[@robynparry]

Uploaded 11 minutes ago, this is a new personal best for me!

[@glanzera]

While it seems unfair that the defendants drove the car free for 6 months, the verdict is about making the victim whole. She has the car back and with the repair costs awarded to her, the car will be worth what it should be worth and the plaintiff will have the asset of $1,250, technically more than what she sold it for. Had the defendants kept the car, JJ would have awarded her the money for what she sold it for, $1,200.

[@AlexK-ew1mo]

It's with the assumption she can sell it for that much.

[@sophocles1198]

If they put a lot of mileage on it, it's worth less. Had she asked for depreciation maybe JJ would have given her a few hundred more.

[@LaoTzudonym]

I miss a 90s Isuzu. Hate that this one got damaged.

[@djjmoney773]

Here because I'm addicted 😩

[@mashaallah8249]

OMG same. 😖😂

[@robertdavidson3934]

good thing she had that picture .

[@ChocolateEyedGirl87]

Hm she should've gotten something for them driving it around for 6 months. They were running the miles up on it and lowering the value

[@madad0406]

Sadly wasn't in her complaint.

[@mommyeclipse4373]

I LOVE YOU JUDGE JUDYYYYYY

[@Castronian]

This has got to be the quickest case from Judge Judy I ever seen

[@jaypeee97]

Lol then look up judge judy horse case that shit was done in like less then 3 mins 😂

[@Castronian]

@@jaypeee97 Damn

[@elizastonereliza3545]

Don't let anyone use your car

[@CoCo-yv3hl]

Win & keep it moving

[@MariaProvenzano-i5f]

Love JJ she brings everything together with fair judgement.

[@KittyeScott-d3q]

Defendants r sneaky&grifters.😒

[@WarGrowlmon18]

She should've sued for the car payments🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[@katesweeney9101]

She could only sue for the car payments if the defendants still had possession of the vehicle. Since she took the vehicle back - which she should have done after the first payment was missed - then she isn't owed anything. Hopefully the plaintiff learned a lesson here. And the defendants are still scumbags for taking a car and driving around for free for 6 months and not feeling bad about.

[@sandrawilson8737]

Judge Judy is very beautiful and very intelligent and the best judge ever

[@Mary-pg3lu]

I have no idea why sometimes, they refused to answered JJ'S question ⁉️

[@DIDYOUSEETHAT172]

1:12 Its called body language. And it is shouting I am about to start lying my ass off!!

[@susiesunshine43]

Ooooo. No she didn't just get smart with JJ!!! AND then she tried to say she "paid insurance" and trying to pull the wool over JJ'S eyes, that crap won't gonna happen!!! Judge Judy lied in court one time saying how she's not a genius, lol, knowing damn well she is!!!

[@PhantomWorksStudios]

Her logic: well if car dealers can repossessed a car and they still have to pay them why can't I do the same??

[@aaronsondag8347]

$122 for an alignment? Did they align the front and set rear toe? Cause if it was just for the front end or just front and rear toe or just front toe that’s a lot!

[@johnjerrehian4642]

This is what happens when one plays bank and does not have a written agreement. Sure, she has the car back but in what condition and how many additional miles. All this affects value.

[@travishoopes9626]

After she sells the car, if there is a loss, she would be able to sue the defendants for that loss as additional damages. Since the car appears worth more than what she initially sold it for, the only way to get more money is to go and sell it and prove an actual loss from the deteriorated condition.

[@celi9133]

Not sure why JJ wouldn't award her the wheel alignment - standard service.

[@maxval5933]

I don't agree with this judgment. I know JJ was trying to "make the plaintiff whole", but the truth is that making her whole means that the defendants borrowed and used the car for six months without paying anything. In cases where the sale of a car gets revoked, the buyer should pay for the time they used it as if the car had been rented. Otherwise, there's an unjust enrichment from the defendants because plaintiff fulfilled her obligation ("to deliver the goods"), and defendants gave nothing to her while still benefitting from the use of the goods. Btw: I know that JJ probably didn't give her a judgment for the use of the car because JJ didn't want plaintiff to get an amount of money that resembled the total value of the car while still keeping the car. However, the unjust enrichment still happens.

[@xoxjanjounxox]

She should have gave the defendants the car and the title and the plaintiff the money. That would have been fair.

[@CameronL211]

Not how it works bud, she sold it for $1200 and got it back and now with the repairs it’s still work $1250 thus she lost nothing. If u get a car repossessed you still will not have to pay the outstanding balance. I do however think they should have paid for the alignment but judge Judy probably is thinking, it most likely was not aligned before they got it and with the age there’s a good chance it wasn’t.

[@xoxjanjounxox]

@Cláudia Silva maybe the car was worth more in that case. I saw a case where the defendants were making payments and they did not get back their money..

[@maxval5933]

@@CameronL211 When you get a car repossessed you don't have to pay the outstanding balance, but while you had the car, you paid for it; that's the whole point. Defendants in this case paid absolutely nothing. Plaintiff may not have lost any money (which is what JJ meant by "making her whole"), but the doctrine of unjust enrichment still applies. Plaintiff lost all the mileage that the defendants used and received nothing for it. If this had been a rental and not a sale, you wouldn't think that plaintiff "lost nothing". In that scenario, if defendants had paid nothing (like they did in this case), and if plaintiff had received back the car plus damages (like she did in this case), you would still think that defendants should pay for the rent while they used the car.

[@Sweetheartx74]

If she didn’t get the car back then yes she would be able to get compensation for the car but since she got the car back she doesn’t get the money

[@tylertyler82]

Why are all of these litigants standing at a slant?

[@briel7904]

😂😂😂😂😂 true

[@vet-7174]

" Great Thank You " 😆😅

[@savannahjackson8513]

What??? You mean I can’t have my cake and eat it too??

[@davidhaney1394]

Why is it people think they can go to court and make a profit ..lol

[@amberwhite8323]

JJ didn’t like the looks of the plaintiff

[@shuromad3667]

That’s my TV mom lol!❤

[@hankrhill324]

$59 for a tire? That’s gotta be the worst tire from the junkyard.

[@tonyhoward7004]

Wait a minute! A tire for $59 ?!?!?! Was this a bicycle?

[@shanawahadali1273]

What justice being served ? When to start with you did the wrong thing by driving a vehicle without insurance 🙄

[@brownskinbeauty.]

If you can't afford to pay a car note every month, why would you take a car with a cracked windshield? That makes no sense

[@joeywomer]

Does the plaintiff have a problem that she's leaning to her right like that?

[@mojisoladeji]

Put whatever transaction you make with people in writing, folks. The defendants behaved like freeloaders using that vehicle and not paying as they said they would.

[@josephcatsanchez6590]

Not a good friend

[@andouille9950]

I am not selling a car to anyone on payments. You want to make monthly payments: get a loan from a bank, credit union, and so on and so forth...

[@EnDB]

She's not whole. She didn't have use of that vehicle for 6 months. No one rents a vehicle for free.

[@tapdance6767]

Typically, I agree with JJ but not this time. The defendants drove a car for free for 6 months. What a deal.

[@ishahcanah7351]

The plaintiff didn’t include that in her case. Judge Judy asked her in the beginning and she said just damages. At the end Judge Judy told her it wasn’t in her claim. JJ gave her everything she asked for… broken windshield and tire. Plus she took the car back.

[@myfaithlove9393]

Dem lady is mad greedy lessons learned never let someone have your car

[@taylornicole4554]

$59 for a tire? where?

[@jazze63]

So they had a free car for 6 months? Why didnt she sue them for not making the payments on it??

[@stevelozano9523]

Fix it and sell it for 1200 and that will make you whole... Just like the tire. 😟🤦‍♂️

[@DD-d6d3]

I disagree with JJ on this one. The plaintiff should have received money for them driving the car. They never made a single payment, and now they have the car rented for free.

[@twoplyboy]

Its only because it wasn't apart of her lawsuit, she didn't write down that she was suing for that otherwise Judge Judy would have dealt with it

[@ReyoVR]

1:03 JJ asked specifically if she was just suing for the damage and she answered yes. JJ was lenient on awarding her the windshield damage already when she has no proof. Their contract didn't specify any interests or fee about late or missed payment so P couldn't have gotten anything anyway.

[@ashleygthompson6313]

JJ asked in the beginning was it for damages & she said yes so that’s pretty clear case

[@nancylarrea9396]

I disagree, she should get something for the car. They used it, she should at least get what you pay for leasing a car.

[@truegrizzlesfan2292]

I get what you saying but the car is only worth 1200. It's no way the defendant should pay more than what car is worth or half the value. The Plantiff should repossessed the car back in 2 months not 6 months. That was on them. Especially they can get all the repairs fix and resell the car . Next time, the Plantiff need to do better job with contract from day 1 not 6 months later If the party font pay anything we will take care back with in xyz days...

[@johnnieredwine8663]

WTH?? I would sell my husband to find a nice-looking $1,200 car hey come on what is she crying about period. People are getting STOOPIDER By the second..js

[@danbirmingham1168]

I like Judge Judy ,but she was wrong this time

[@northernlight40]

Judy getting senile ,what about the miles they put on it ,

[@eolafan100]

The female defendant needs to get better quality false teeth.

[@bigtimetimmyjim6486]

I did 🙂

[@lianmawii]

It says 8 comments but i see none

[@thatgirlPAIGE94]

Same! Yours was the only one that came up

[@curtissylvia4617]

sort by "newest" then the comments will show.

[@elvickRULES]

Sort by new, it’s now I see yours. Can’t see any replies though and not sure how to fix that lol

[@prairierider7569]

I have the same and replies don’t show. Are you in Canada too? I have a hunch if you are

[@lianmawii]

@@prairierider7569 im from india😂

[@69misst1]

She is whole but it doesn’t discourage the defendants from pulling the scam again on someone else