Why a full-range driver and High-End Audio are not compatible.

[@georgeswanson9483]

Within its limitations a well designed single driver back loaded horn loudspeaker can sound very good and combined with well designed simple tube amplification is a great way for people to have a place to start without spending an enormous amount of money. You have to start somewhere.

[@bartvanransbeeck1341]

Romy the cath has good ears and taste, inthe 60 ies in Belgium a audio brand 'Dumortier' Sforzando ' told me 'the best mid ' is the vitavox driver...he prefered actif crossovers , he saw amplifiers having stability issues caused bi caps in passif crossovers....he make klipsch alike systems with vitavox mids and electrovoice 18" bass....

[@tonymckay6556]

old dog the best mid are the we555 and telefunken.

[@martymcfly3837]

The Voxativ products tell me a other story to my ears. Just listen;) everybody has other preferences..

[@Mikexception]

I heard here many times repeated "second harmonics" which was not defined how to understand it .I suspect author has in mind some original harmonics which are due to many reasons lacking because overlayed by most speakers systems . . So far I heard many times about second raw harmonics distortions which is must in el guitar amplifiers.

[@rewind9536]

You can cut off the whizzer cone and then have an excellent wide band driver.

[@tonymckay6556]

talkative old dog the ultimate is a system with deep imaging. i already listened the expensive wilson sonus focal and tidal, all garbage no imaging only loud for deaf audiophiles.

[@Rowuk2024]

Full-range is a bad name. There is nothing full about their response. Wide band could be more realistic. The issue of tonal requirements for each band is not even understood by the single driver advocates.