Why AI Art Is Bad: The Truth Behind The AI Art Trend

[@RaisedByRage]

hey guys! dont forget to subscribe, I have a couple more videos coming out this month :] will be experimenting with reddit stuff also, do let me know if there is a particular style of video you guys want :]

[@saladfingers7560]

Love the video. But it's hard to caoncentrate bc the pano is a bit loud

[@RaisedByRage]

Sorry 😬😬 will adjust the volume levels better next time!

[@Татьяна-х8л7х]

There are many goods that just copy/pasted on the factories by machines, they are cheap and accessible, as well as fast food, simple box-shaped houses made of plasterboard, cheap synthetic clothes, but there IS a huge value of hand-made furniture, hand-made unique accessories, food from the chef according to the author's recipe . It's just mass consumer goods with no soul and no quiality, AI art is the same as everything that I listed above, it is cheap, fast and easy for those who don't want quality because it's too expensive... or just because they have no taste.

[@nailbomb420]

One thing I want to point out is you said AI has a brain, but in this case that's not true, generative AI is literally just an algorithm. If AI had a brain, we would be venturing into something much much wilder, because then we would have the ethical dilemma of the AI being equivalent to a living thing, and living/intelligent things tend to have rights etc and it would be potentially unethical to force a sentient thing to make art or do any other task. Honestly at that point, I wouldn't mind AI art, because it would hopefully be something that the AI created because it wanted to --- however that is very far away from being a thing, like I said all we have at the minute is algorithms, not AI brains. Anyways, liked the video, like your style - \m/ subbed \m/ -

[@RaisedByRage]

The algorithm is what I'm referring to as the "brain" haha, not an actual brain in the traditional sense! Glad you liked the video, thank you so much 🫶

[@Gisleburt]

Really enjoyed the video (though def turn down the bg music a touch 😉, though I know from experience its hard to gauge as it always sounds different on different headphones/speakers/etc). Think you hit on all the main points but would also like to put forward the enormous energy cost. Like, its a frightening amount of energy (and therefore carbon) to train and use these models.

[@RaisedByRage]

(Will make a mental note about the bg music!) Energy cost is a good point, I wasn't aware of this actually!

[@Dasamael]

Thank you!!!!

[@RaisedByRage]

You're welcome!

[@owinlaa]

The piano music is a bit too loud

[@RaisedByRage]

Sorry 😬

[@carultch]

@@RaisedByRage Was it AI generated piano music?

[@RaisedByRage]

No it wasn't.

[@pestkaislearning]

SAY IT LOUDER FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK!

[@RaisedByRage]

Glad you agree !

[@r3nnoc]

really great video ! ! the music is maybe slightly too loud

[@Gentlyjack1]

I couldn't even artificially hear the person talking, had to read the captions for the entire video... I mean I already do read them even if I can artifically hear the voices anyways. (Am deaf, relying on HA/CI for artificial hearing)

[@RaisedByRage]

I am so sorry guys! I will do better in balancing the audio levels in my next video :]

[@jorgmuller3110]

BTW The jump cuts are a bit annoying formally, they remind me a bit of "Max Headroom" ... oops

[@voidnoidoid]

my mum wanted to ai generate my CV pic 😭😭😭 ai art sucks ass for multiple reasons youve touched on and i agree

[@RaisedByRage]

Nah what the heck 💀💀

[@yukouri]

Ai has an algorithm that can only calculate probabilities and put pixels next to each other, but it’ll be unable to explain the why of its actions on an image it has made as it has no brain to reason with. Other than that, great video!!

[@RaisedByRage]

Glad you enjoyed the video!

[@kimsfusionart]

New subscriber, like you style.

[@RaisedByRage]

Thank you so much !

[@Rlg4x]

Good video :).

[@RaisedByRage]

Thank you :]

[@jorgmuller3110]

Art can be a hobby, but it is more so an attitude of perception. That should not be outsourced to soulless machines, right

[@Xavier-r7c]

Lovely Piano playing in the back , The AI has it's uses maybe as a tool to help artists experiment and develop artistic ideas. Also It's cool having a generator to make anything you want from cool profile photo to something that you make from feeling and thoughts to an image.

[@toragom9957]

neah... AI is the future.

[@whitenightmare4426]

the chaos's future, if people don't fight against it

[@toragom9957]

@@whitenightmare4426 Ginny's out of the bottle. Fighting it is a mistake.

[@SkippysBacon]

​@@toragom9957I guess I'll just let my dreams die then... Oh well. Nah. Real art has value that's worth fighting for. Sure, AI is here to stay. That doesn't mean we have to lie down and let it take over completely. It's not an easy fight, but it's not a mistake to fight back. Besides, as AI art takes over the internet, it becomes part of the training data and it will corrupt itself by feeding on itself. It needs real art to sustain itself.

[@toragom9957]

@@SkippysBacon AI needs that. AGI won't need artists. Future is here. Adapt or die.

[@thatfishbone]

@@toragom9957 You can't even spell without AI now. That is tragic.