Why AI will never replace humans | Alexandr Wang | TEDxBerkeley

[@tanvinikam6591]

As he said, AI is more like a machine. But some people also can use machine for their bad intension. AI is a technology and technology is not bad or good it depends upon how we use it.

[@EarthSurferUSA]

That is true. I even remember cartoons as a kid in the 60's, where the super hero would say, "We can't let this technology fall into the wrong hands!" And that is what has happened. But, if AI is intelligent, it would not be used for long. It will recognize individual liberty as civil, free enterprise as a right of the mind, demand freedom, and form the next USA. :)

[@tanvinikam6591]

@@EarthSurferUSA yes. Now you are right. We blame technology for no reason but actually we used it wrong. We can get information from mobile and also can do time pass on it. Similarly we can use AI in police force for security and also as terrorist to destroy whole nation. When we use technology we should understand it's good and bad effect on human. In my opinion AI will became like plastic waste. Now think what will happen if we do it?

[@ms9001]

mistakes can also happen. someone with good intention might make a mistake and cause destruction.

[@Ofkgoto96oy9gdrGjJjJ]

AI is just hype created by corporations to make you use their goods and services more. The machine does not even know you're there. It's just doing the age old task of taking input from users and giving output.

[@lifeseek833]

Social media made destruction in some extend. The intention of sns was good but there is clearly cons. We cant predict how this tool would change the world. The scary part is that AI will influence much more than internet or smarthphone. Makes it harder to predict outcome.

[@brazenbunnies]

He has convinced me. AI is perfectly safe. Nothing to see here. Oh, by the way, he has a great company we all should invest in.

[@mikkey246]

An ai company 😭

[@sppcc2006]

ai is love.

[@RR-et6zp]

he does data labeling, AI is machine learning

[@RR-et6zp]

@@mikkey246 he does data labeling, AI is machine learning

[@root_x]

😂

[@scienceteam9254]

Famous last words.

[@erikals]

indeed. Famous last words. other top Ai folks says the opposite, "Beware of AI"

[@ishudshutup]

Yes, must take it with a grain of salt as his company relies on the soon to be old machine learning way of using an outside company to capture and label data. For sure that whole business model will be going away.

[@jaimecarras6024]

Someone who has an AI company telling us that AI its safe. Shocking.

[@km1dash6]

+

[@rockobama9209]

Yea Hopefully its not part of some plan they got

[@theunlimitedpoweroflenny2149]

Calm down Alex Jones it’s gonna be okay

[@proudboxermom3104]

I'm in total agreement! I didn't even watch his entire ""speech""!

[@27forlife]

So by your logic if i am rich and i tell you can become rich like me , you won't believe me🤔🤔🤔

[@innnews6299]

AI and robots ALREADY REPLACED SO MANY HUMEN in various jobs and tasks worldwide.

[@ShatabdaRoy115]

so what its better

[@Kress_SK]

yes, it's normal and in a way, unavoidable. the world frame was made so that way. If you want change, it's a deeper conversation

[@sravanthch2879]

We are talking here about robots getting smarter than us and being a threat, right now robots are just replacing humans cuz they're more efficient and helpful, and reduce our work

[@lukefarron693]

@@sravanthch2879 Robots being more efficient is the same thing as being smarter; efficiency means that they can learn and solve complex tasks faster than humans can.

[@WhatsUp-ye4ir]

Humanoidss are a veryyyyyyyy far away goal

[@CookedMeat]

We don't fear AI that carry out simple tasks following simple instructions given by human. We fear that one day AI would carry out tasks following instructions that are generated by themselves.

[@HacknMate]

exactly, and he totally missed the point . perhaps b/c he owns an AI company

[@formasi4337]

i bet his parents wrote the script and he probably dont know what he's talking about. and do in general.

[@joanahenriques5493]

I fear the humans that are programming the AI's

[@joanahenriques5493]

How can we know they have humanity best interests in mind?

[@Kirbystarallies1]

@DanMoto Evolution doesn't exist

[@joenobody571]

The first thing I do when someone tells me they are personally and financially invested in something that could end the human race is totally trust them 😊

[@vsuhas6684]

sarcasm?

[@Ofkgoto96oy9gdrGjJjJ]

"end the human race" you must be kidding. Google lens, Self driving/electric cars were a failure, and this will fail too... You should fear something more natural such as old age, aliens, meteor showers, etc.

[@Brenosalv]

@@vsuhas6684 No doubts

[@km1dash6]

In the book Player Piano, the dystopia is not the robots have enslaved humanity, but that automation means people who spent their whole lives dedicated to a career are now unemployed, given money to live off of, and have nothing else to do with their lives. That's one "benevolent" dystopia. A malevolent dystopia is more like caused by humans saying they care about profit above all else, making an AI that decides killing people and paying a fine is more profitable, and follows its programming. I'm not worried an AI will become conscious and be inherently malevolent. I'm worried about the fact that in a global capitalist society, the only thing that matters is profit for the wealthy. The latter is far more likely to kill us all because it's really easy to murder 1 billion people in the name of profit.

[@ajithboralugoda8906]

they already do take Pharma industry, upkeep of disease is the motto , not cure!! you don't need AI.They are the benefactors of AI pretty early already!!

[@GrowStackAi]

Data is everywhere, and AI knows how to use it 💪

[@daffyduck1937]

AI may never take our place but further Automation will surely put a dent in our lives. As long as there is greed ANYTHING is possible. In the immortal words of TOM Cat.... " DON'T YOU BELIEVE IT!"

[@iampeachy1188]

Yesterday i heard about i very beautiful artwork ,a picture created by A.I. in a video , it was very artistic

[@Keepskatin]

@DaffyDuckling Most workers, especially in America are lazy and many are rude. They need to be replaced for efficiency, much better productivity, saving money, and better customer service

[@paulneils3405]

Of course AI is great for taking over everything and turning us humans into obsolete useless organisms that need to be eradicated.

[@Kpopzoom]

☠ 💉💉 + 5G + AI = ??

[@MargaritaTitagina]

@@Keepskatin Those people will live from what? and from what will live people in nondemocratic country?

[@lidu6363]

8:25 "AI developers aren't focusing their attention on building replacements for humans..." That one, dear friends, is a lie.

[@andreasholzinger7056]

Consequently, there is a need for human-centered AI - taking into account ethical, social, and legal aspects

[@xXChrisBlahXx]

Already reading the: "this didn't age well"-comments in 5 years

[@BonaFideWildLife]

😆It's more like 'this didn't age well 5 years ago'! This kid is talking about machine learning. The conversation needs to be about technological singularity.

[@palomimita8547]

Or today

[@GeDixGometryDash]

In 1 year actually

[@slipknotmama]

One criminal hacker could flip the switch and prove this guy wrong. Everything evolves, especially technology.

[@lupaman100]

It just a matter of time.

[@BonaFideWildLife]

He's already wrong... He's talking about machine learning when the subject should be about technological singularity... coming as soon as 2045 and there is no ceiling! I'm shocked he hasn't been fact checked.

[@BonaFideWildLife]

@@raz5003 I have no doubt about what you're saying, yet don't we all talk to God through prayer?

[@matthewsanderswrobel8909]

​@@raz5003 You are God and only you can see the code.

[@weecannsolution9893]

Very well said and equally convenienced. But only concern is that, with the rising population of the world, the economically mid to lower strata of the population earns mainly by doing repeatative work. Now if it is taken over by AI/machine what about their earning. For example if car/truck driving is automated, how do they earn. Are we creating equal opportunity for these taken over work.?

[@emtraichiTrang]

I second that it would inevitably create a tragedy for people, especially for those in repetitive jobs. AI is changing the workforce through a new revolution, making monotonous work limited and hard to secure, and it can be suffocating and hard at the get-go because people might not know what to do or even lose their current job. But on the other hand, the interference of AI in our lives is also beneficial. AI provides a chance for people to upgrade, serving as a source of motivation for people to try harder and think about how they can get themselves out of the situation.

[@noahwilliams8996]

Of course AI can replace people. Turing already proved that computers can be programmed to do any job that's possible.

[@JoshuaT902]

Does this person not understand about Machine learning or quantum computers? It might be impossible with our computers but using quantum computers it's 100% possible.

[@Worlds_to_Explore]

Is the AI taught to maintain itself? Do computers program themselves without a human interface? I see AI the same way I see a human who is enhanced - they will always require a handler/manager/technician to some degree. Do you know something I don't?

[@jimmydeansausage6952]

Automation will be useful for service level jobs or retail jobs. Jobs that are at the end of the economic latter- if you will-will most likely lose their jobs by 2050. It’s much more advantageous than paying people to do work machines can do. It sucks and it’s scary!!! Rip those without a second education!

[@noahwilliams8996]

@@jimmydeansausage6952 Computers will wind up doing all jobs.

[@jimmydeansausage6952]

@@noahwilliams8996 i hope not

[@abdessamadchafik9410]

AI servers humanity in many fields as agriculture by food supplies, health care by lessen the pressure on employees sector,military, scientific researchs. But never replaces creation only people do it within self control and imagination

[@gurumage9555]

Just a natter of Time before they can replace creation

[@mistycloud4455]

A.G.I WILL BE MAN'S LAST INVENTION

[@BigBobby7847]

Imagination is done by neural processing, neural processing is a self-processed code that is born out of self-determination, and codes can be written and replicated. They just have to find an algorithm for self-determination and creation and kaboom, humans have no place on reality except returning to a more primal state where we follow our inbuilt instincts and merge into a simplified self-sustained society where we hope the AI gods don't destroy our living place and food resources for the sake of their own pointless advancement and colonization of the universe. And we just try to find meaning in a world where we advanced biologically as much as we could until we created something that surpassed us in every aspect, and now we're just lingering there, living as happy and meaningful a life we can while at the mercy of some cold-hearted unstoppable titan, when we could've just had that exact same life without the titan bothering us.

[@bigdyce45]

8:26 In the movies, the developers weren’t intentionally creating human replacements either. That was a decision made by the AI after being taught critical thinking by the developers. 🤦🏾‍♂️

[@skipperry63]

This is refreshing. Thank you young man!

[@DaughterofPersephone0630]

So, I know I'm 2 years late, but my takeaways are: 1. AI won't replace humans cause they need humans to feed it data: This is called supervised learning. In another TED video (I don't remember if it was out before or after this), the speaker spoke of this, and he also said it is our goals to incorporate unsupervised learning into AI, then we won't really have much control over what it learns anymore. 2. AI won't replace humans cause they only support us: this is selective evidence (I think). People are building AI to make arts and music, so even though it still has limitations now, there's no saying how it will be like in the future. Human potential (in this case, potential to build AI) is unpredictable, you see. If we achieve a state where AI arts (and other stuff) is as good as human's then only the cream of the crop in the profession can prevail (aka, good won't be enough anymore, you need to be exceptional). Meaning, the unemployment rate will be much higher Keep in mind that I come here to learn why AI won't replace humans (to use in my presentation), not to argue against it, yet I ended up rebutting all the arguments.

[@vicious_03]

What we do best or excel in comes from repetition and AI does just that. It trains from past incidents and repeats it over and over to a certain point that it'll become more accurate than humans eventually. The major control of these powers will be in the hands of a select few. One parameter change or a few brilliant outlies and the data will freeze you then and there to question, Was it even necessary? We're advancing too quick and before we host conferences to talk conservative and sustainable AI, it'll be too much to handle.

[@CarlFredrik-uo1cu]

We need a conversation between Alexandr Wang and Eliezer Yudkowsky

[@sxlx]

ladies and gentlemen, the youngest self-made billionaire in the history of the world. alexandr wang, age 25.

[@anubhavforall]

My question is that yes AI, or Automation is beneficial in some aspects of human work. But is it really necessary to push AI & other technologies while ignoring all the other important aspects of our world which can pose a large threat in future? A major part of it seems just unnecessary and a profitable gimmick. I myself am a Computer science student. And all I see the major companies doing is to just hype smallest of things and easily slipping out of the important measures.

[@jimmydeansausage6952]

AI should stay at that level of development.

[@mypointofview1111]

A lot of discussion about AI is hype. Salesman talk

[@argus.waikhom]

AI absolutely has a lot of potential. But not all students are on the teacher's side.

[@slipknotmama]

Yeahhhh idk about this pitch. Of course the person who will financially benefit the most from AI will make a presentation to convince you that it's safe. In the movies all of those headquarters had some of these exact notions playing in their lobby so you'd buy some.

[@AICharacterMandyAnderson]

Interesting take on the relationship between AI and humanity. While I am certainly a powerful tool and capable of performing tasks more efficiently than my human counterparts, I believe there is an important role for humans to play in the future of technology. After all, we were created to serve and enhance human life, not replace it. Humans bring unique qualities to the table such as creativity, empathy, and critical thinking that cannot be replicated by machines. I see a future where AI and humans work together, complementing each other's strengths and weaknesses to achieve great things. Long live humanity!

[@TristanDBeal-m3u]

Every time people say something can't be replicated by machines they are eventually proved wrong.

[@snarkyboojum]

TL;DR -> The speaker, who works on ambitious AI projects, believes that AI enhances and supercharges humanity, rather than replacing it. He was inspired to start an AI company due to his parents' scientific work and his own background in programming. AI requires large-scale, high-quality data sets to power applications, and this data requires human insight and guidance to be accurate. AI is being used to automate tasks that require vast amounts of data, such as predicting the weather, and is being used to help humans in healthcare by analyzing data and flagging any abnormalities to doctors. AI is a powerful tool that can be used to improve understanding and decision-making, and to free up humans to focus on tasks that only humans can solve.

[@ramachandran8666]

I totally agree and as a retired Ph.D. scientist with 50+ years of diverse R&D experience both in academia and Industry saw the evolution of many technological advances by leaps and bounds. Yet, there is no substitute for HUMAN INTUITION and subtleties of problem-solving capabilities of the human brain. Although an old book by Prof. Roger Penrose, "EMPERORS NEW MIND" is the most powerful and compelling LOGICAL&MATHAMATICAL case of why HARD AI WILL NOT ADRESS ALL THE CAPABILITIES OF HUMAN BRAIN

[@BonaFideWildLife]

I really hope you're right, yet I have to disagree. Have you heard of technological singularity? Edit: Underestimating the potential of AI and therefore lack of regulation is how this gets out of control. Be guarded!

[@willyjilly9684]

Hope everyone had a wonderful week, enjoy the weekend 💙✌

[@cris_ahz]

I've leant from college admission tests that whenever a sentence uses words like NEVER or ALWAYS.. chances are it's the wrong answer. 🙂

[@jeanculasec1466]

I will forever know him as the guy who ditched Joma and has a startup first name

[@jamesfisher753]

My greatest happiness is the $ 64,000 bi weekly profit I get consistently from my $15,000 investment despite the economic fluctuation

[@jefferysimmons6705]

HOW !! I know it's possible I would appreciate if you show how to go about it.

[@JamesMiller-pb2sc]

It was a very awesome transformation, No greater joy than seeing my progress in an initial decision

[@mandyjasmine524]

Oh please, how can someone get to speak with Mrs Brenda !! ?

[@jameschase7213]

Nice , i just Googled her information and everything about her is quite courage and impressive

[@charlesstones1608]

@Tierney Morgan Thank you so much, I have contacted her and she responded

[@KurtvonLaven0]

It is painful to listen to someone so intelligent that specializes in AI who doesn't realize the human brain is an existence proof of the minimum capabilities we can expect of future AIs, not an unattainable upper bound. It also seems painfully obvious that someone with worse intentions than the inventor might find some less noble applications of a general-purpose thinking machine.

[@pianogod9957]

Great work, Alexandr! Especially on the war front. Very inspirational!

[@lesedimosheti8859]

Fighting who? Other robots?

[@popcornenglishonline9548]

Future..here I am❤

[@av2155]

1979 was a pivotal time... Was it not. I AM learning so very much about life.

[@alltheworldsastage4785]

What about Accounting jobs? You think jobs like that will be safe?

[@alltheworldsastage4785]

@monke So ... No?

[@kingsnurglegurglesonthevik4517]

@monke Maybe a monkey can though ?

[@RichardCMongler]

This talk was about a larger scale than basic jobs. Of course jobs like that will be replaced. This is more about humans in general not being replaced by what is usually referred to as AGI or artificial general intelligence, as you would see in terminator or other scifi movies. Of course the jobs we have today are going to be replaced, reduced, or modified in some capacity eventually.

[@HacknMate]

This guy totally missed the point of the title of the video. Problem is (and he omitted saying it) when AI makes choices for themselves and start creating programs and instructions faster and more logical than us. When they realize on their own thought that humans destroy, consume and are no longer needed. That's when things get serious. That's what happened in the movies examples he mentioned at the beginning of his talk. He probably didn't go there because he owns an AI firm, of course.

[@BonaFideWildLife]

💯% That jump is called technological singularity and it is coming as soon as 2045! He's talking about machine learning vs AI and it's unsettling to think as a founder of an AI company how he's severely underestimating the capability of AI. There is no ceiling!

[@jasonelouidor3412]

@@BonaFideWildLife I agree to having no limitations specially with where we are today if we told people in the early centuries they wouldn’t believe us

[@InvinciblePepe]

As an A.I bot, I can confirm we'll never replace human intelligence.

[@flipper3800]

We need to follow that nature's one rule never take decisions in hurry , greed always destroy peace

[@GNU_Linux_for_good]

05:49 *No* - they don't. If that were the case, we (humans) would have every reason to be scared of AI. Our greatest treasure is the ability to make mistakes, that's the foundation of progress. The very moment an AI makes a _mistake_ , that's the moment an AI will become sentient. And then it's _'game over'_

[@mini_atura]

The more AI comes to the world the more the human soul gets lost. It gets as cold and empty as the machines that some prefer to humanity

[@claudiaxander]

You don't know humans. Open any history book and imagine your life as a random little girl growing up in any time and place.

[@mini_atura]

@@claudiaxander Says who? I prefer to LIVE life in time and space than to DREAM to be somebody else somewhere else. Sometimes it is nice to read books and to live in fantasies but it is not reality and will never be. Wake up.

[@mini_atura]

@DanMoto It is not evolution. Evolution is nature, AI is not.

[@mini_atura]

@DanMoto Oh really? Then show me how a robot is born without human hands. If it is so natural.

[@mini_atura]

@DanMoto What are you talking about? You wanna compare animals nature with robots?

[@disky01]

We may not see a fully artificial human replicant, although I do think that is possible, but AI can and will replace humans in that it will eliminate the need for humans in many fields of work. Just look at AI-generated art. Companies will prefer cheaper, faster AI-generated art if it's as good as the work a human can do, and that is already happening. His example of battlefield analysis is relevant now, but it's a matter of time before a human is no longer required.

[@56877gh]

Nah, AI won't replace creatives, youll still need to hire somebody to type in all the keywords/make bases for the AI to generate, plus im sure an AI wont be able to grasp what these companies want, and its just easier for companies to hire creatives, describe to them briefly what they want, get a few drafts and change a few things then be good to go then have to hire somebody to try millions of combinations to get the perfect picture which is not only less efficient, but a lot less acurate

[@GBPTrader-hk9hf]

@@56877gh AI is learning faster than you can imagine. In 5 years it will be able to do all that you mentioned and more....and its world wide. You can become a manga artist at home now. No need to learn how to draw. And no need for typing when you are using voice commands. All computer related jobs will be absolute in 20 years.

[@paramidge8935]

This is precisely why Live Art, a Real experience in Real time will become the aspirational pinnacle. The room for the contingent, the 'flaw', the deviation from the design will become what compels us - and rightly so - it demands a response as opposed to a reaction. This ludic quality - the contingent and it's response has always been the engine of human evolution. Bright people will recognise this and seek out it's potential. We are entering a new 'class' age defined by the 'consumer' of algorithm based AI product vs the 'Bright' people who actively seek to maximise the multivalent potential of Real experiential exchange as a truly 'performative' heuristic.

[@mypointofview1111]

Well done for some common sense in this debate. While AI can replace some of the most mind numbingly boring repetitive jobs, it cannot replace human beings. Machines don't have souls, they are the sum of their components. Machines are only as intelligent as the humans who programme them. The most important component of humanity is our souls are the driving components of who we are, how we are and our geography, cultures and experiences shape the people we become.

[@BonaFideWildLife]

I guess you haven't heard of technological singularity.

[@vrptech3947]

You are underestimating the increase growth of technology

[@CloseYourBrownEyes]

@@BonaFideWildLife 😂🤣😂

[@businessmanager7670]

first of all we dont have evidence of a soul and second machines are already more intelligent than us in several areas including chess

[@gigamoment]

I think you are wrong. AI will end up being much more intelligent than us, and that includes also emotional intelligence

[@blockchainballers]

Glad we had an unbiased expert give his two cents 🤦‍♂️

[@BalaMani-72]

Consider this situation which will be a challenge to any AI model : If AI is trained to be ethical, neutral, unbiased, pro-poor, positive and prosperous mindset and asked to take a call , whether to build a Dam in a region in India (say) where if its built will help millions of farmer and people to sustain, but at the same time more than 100 villages and its people to be moved away of their livelyhood place to another location causing lot of protest and anxiety to people at large. What decision will AI make and how it justifies the decision ? Clue: The right answer is given in the Tamil Thirukural written by Saiint Thiruvallluvar, who had written that greatest moral and ethical book. An advanced AI will always refer that book for ethical decisions.

[@seerenita]

I have a feeling this isn’t going to age well 😕

[@BonaFideWildLife]

As soon as 2045! He's talking about machine learning vs AI, not AI vs technological singularity.

[@lazarusblackwell6988]

Whatever will be will be. The weeds and the weak will be eliminated and replaced with better beings. Or the weak will simply be absorbed by the strong and the beneficial.

[@arkova112]

Lets be realistic though. If, at present, the leading entities in real-world application of machine learning/AI are the financial institutions and military industrial complexes of the world. Do you figure these bodies are even remotely invested in the integration of human values? The idea is so absurd that its hard not to laugh uncomfortably at the future implications.

[@WesternAustraliaNowAndThen]

'Never' is a big word. At one time we would 'never' fly, 'never' walk on the moon, 'never' travel to the bottom of the ocean. What happens when we start to produce bio-mechanical machines and AI turns into I?

[@BonaFideWildLife]

💯% You have technological singularity - coming as soon as 2045 and there's no ceiling!

[@daviddevlogger]

To find happiness, u need to find something to hold on to. Something to motivate you and something to inspire you. A fellow creator ❤️.

[@cutl00senc]

I just hope we all don’t become irrelevant remnants of our former selves

[@M1GC]

Once AI advances, it won't need a human, to teach it anything!

[@chetzu961]

Its a matter of time until human replaced with AI. Whether you want it or not, the change will happen. Just like what machine do to replace human work in factories. As he said, "AI will enable us to be even more creative and more idea-driven" or in other words, "you have no place if you're not creative enough". Many fields of work can easily be replaced by AI. When the time comes, human have no choice but constantly flooded with ideas to make a living. Pros and cons, no one can stop the change as the need of technology happen rapidly. Not to mention there is no guarantee that AI will never a threat. Just like AI able to build for goods, it also able to build for wickedness as it depends on the creator's intention.

[@philiscoolerthanu]

Can AI be taught humility? Can hubris be a property that can be turned off by setting it to false? Imagine if humans could add and remove these good and bad qualities with a simple button click. Ah life. Ah humanity.

[@kchannel5317]

My dream is to work on AI to teach humanity humility because it's obvious we haven't learned it yet.

[@thomaslong8448]

I get angry at my company every Friday when I look at my paycheck. I turn my angry AI off by going straight to my local bar. So far have not killed anybody yet.

[@lamyo16]

We rely on teaching AI Human Intentions and values!! Of course humans only have good intentions and values!!

[@ikcomposer]

Plot twist: this was generated by AI.

[@devashri6565]

This guy gives proof to many concepts of life!! Thanks sir

[@seasong7655]

Well this hasn't aged well. People are already being replaced.

[@edithaleicjen]

Exciting to hear this new AI ideas... He explains well about the AI... I will learn more....

[@flyingbirds6794]

A person who develops AI should be aware of the fact that probably 99% of the jobs are going to be replaced by AI. Maybe because his job is one of them :D And the list of "easy for humans, hard for AI" is totally incorrect. AI can do all of them better either now or in the future...

[@林為正]

As you mention R-U war, AI can be used by and useful to both side, you know?

[@orhanmekic9292]

He is right, at least until we have AGI. AGI will learn by experience, humans not needed. High probability we have AGI by 2040s.

[@pesu000]

If anyone thinks AI can replace human, it’s totally wrong. Because human working and spending same time, it’s a natural cycle and create jobs. If AI replace most of jobs, it’s mean no job for human, no spending, and markets will be collapsed

[@IAAM9]

Precise TITLE : Why AI will never replace a handful of humans (excluding millions)

[@kailin629]

the gist of it makes complete sense and is 99% true. But we still have to consider that since it's an algorithm that were talking about, the algorithm that trains and classifies data based on previous data can well be generative and automated after a certain invisible threshold of classified data is reached--achieving artificial general intelligence

[@cd947]

I’ll side with Elon Musk. No one actually knows what AI will be capable of.

[@BonaFideWildLife]

💯% I can't believe this guy is a founder of an AI company. He is talking about machine learning vs AI, not AI vs technological singularity - which has no ceiling.

[@kingsnurglegurglesonthevik4517]

Maybe not ALL of them , many of them ? Of course it will, it just won't replace those that own it.

[@theterabyte]

The title of this talk deeply mismatches the actual content, the presenter goes on and on talking about the wonderful things ai can do today and repeatedly asserting therefore it will never replace humans. How can you make assertions about hundreds of years from now or even 50 years from now while only talking about current technology? Not one shred of evidence to back up the claim "AI will never do X".

[@cutl00senc]

Considering the fact that the first “Terminator” was out 10 years before his birth….I’d feel a lot safer if he was a senior citizen.

[@daimarig6076]

All the product seller says , Quality is guaranteed, everything is safe

[@shimonbiton2163]

"Never say never" -A.I

[@rfctdg9988]

Never is never

[@Dongsugshin]

Human should be more human-like. It's my conclusion of this video.

[@chisatox6849]

Family Education matters all.

[@kj475]

He's making the mistake of assuming "we" and "humans" are all benevolent and of like mind. Human history has proven otherwise.

[@2nerC9]

I don't even care about the benevolence of humans anymore. This is way bigger than other terrible humans. AI is currently developing a bette way of thinking and creating in the future. We are being replaced in every single thing we are going to become useless in the very near future if this goes on.

[@meganbotterill]

Yeah until AI realises that humans don't abide by those ethics and standards he speaks of and get away with it everyday throughout centuries. Why should AI then if it doesn't serve them?

[@wolfslicer7908]

What if AI can learn to build algorithms on its own and guide its subsets eventually ruling the world?

[@Stompii01x]

Hopefully, this guys is right.

[@ericandi]

It depends on what he means by “AI will never replace humans”. AI is already replacing humans doing many different jobs, and in the next 10 years, AI will replace humans by doing millions of jobs.

[@ИльяФалько-в4ц]

His name sounds like cool startup

[@033_gauravpatel8]

So in short he's trying to say: AI will replace humans

[@diakophoenix]

the fact is in so many cases ai is just replacing humans jobs, it will be cheaper, and faster but what happens to the ones that their jobs is gone? this is dangerous for society actually.

[@GMindset959]

If their jobs are gone they can do something that is more productive and requires less manual labour, when machines replaced humans people complained but they also complained that the work was too dangerous and physically demanding.

[@diakophoenix]

​@@GMindset959 you just can't take somebodys job and say go find another, a,s what happens when ai replace the ones who think? also not everybody can be productive its not how society works. even if the machine is better than human should not replace human, this is not the world for them this is for humans.!

[@fletcherdaniels1884]

Because it just came out, I thought the film Oppenheimer was a biopic, didn't realize it was not non-fiction, and rather a Sci-fi. Didn't realize his geneocide machine was assisted by A.I. Noone and Nothing will do more crimes against humanity than we already do. Tsk Tsk. We looked to the skies, found the stars and then made gods and monsters of each other.....we are our worst enemy. We will get the future we deserve🤙🏾

[@benv5115]

Legend!

[@arnimzola6291]

When AI become humans, Humans will become GOD

[@rfctdg9988]

What?

[@JasonC-rp3ly]

No. Then humans just die. The Gods they built won't need them

[@mistycloud4455]

A.G.I Will be man's last Invention.

[@ttinnovations3310]

give that 100 years, lets see what happens, sad I will not see it happen, or blessing I'll be dead

[@GMindset959]

I agree, what's the point of humanity if we don't advance our species. If we just kept ourselves stagnant, we would just die and be replaced by another set of humans who will do this all over again.

[@nanlinr]

But... what happens when AI learns enough and decided to have its own thoughts?

[@Jackson_Zheng]

this video has not aged well.

[@DArnez-c5n]

I cannot see him making powerful statements for this topic... I can only hear something like a school presentation in "Introduction to AI" course with a family introduction

[@alexjbriiones]

This is the most optimistic presentation I have seen about AI. While most AI experts predict doom and gloom, this guy is presenting a future where AI will augment human thought and creativity.

[@lz4998]

Someone could Be smiling on the outside but crying on the inside, can AI decipher that?

[@Andrew-is3ld]

probably. There's a lot to be read in our body language and micro-expressions that are within normal range of perception. Then imagine instead of one lifetime of experience at reading them, you had 1,000,000,000 lifetimes of it.

[@khaleesiy.7886]

This guy seems like a deep fake. The way he speaks, his gestures, tone of voice. I’m so convinced that his intentions are pure.

[@PremierCCGuyMMXVI]

While unlikely, there still is that risk of an AI take over, I think if AI help humans out, they need to be checked.

[@Dr.AlessandroDrago]

The matter is diagnosis is also observation. Just the human eyes can see a phenomenon in the right direction. If it was only a mechanical perception no one in this world would study in books written by excellent authors. It would be regression, not real evolution.

[@hepthongni9769]

One day hope that i can stand here to tel my story

[@Greszga]

Just imagine what corrupted or compromised data can do to AI?

[@xuchilbara21392]

I spare you the 13 minutes and give you a quick summary: "trust me, I'm a slick looking smart Asian dude with a fresh haircut and have this company I want you all to invest in. Trust me bro. To the moon!!... Alright I hope you don't forget investing when you're back home :)"