Why Are the Police Investigating “Non-crime”? - Andrew Doyle

This authoritarian abuse of state power has to stop...
💥Join us on our Journey to 1 Million Subscribers💥
Andrew's Substack - andrewdoyle.substack.com/p/wh...
Andrew's Twitter - / andrewdoyle_com
Join our exclusive TRIGGERnometry community on Locals! triggernometry.locals.com/
OR Support TRIGGERnometry Here:
Bitcoin: bc1qm6vvhduc6s3rvy8u76sllmrfpynfv94qw8p8d5
Music by: Music by: Xentric | [e-mail] | www.xentricapc.com/ KZbin: @xentricapc
Buy Merch Here:
www.triggerpod.co.uk/shop/
Advertise on TRIGGERnometry:
[e-mail]
Join the Mailing List:
www.triggerpod.co.uk/#mailing...
Find TRIGGERnometry on Social Media:
/ triggerpod
/ triggerpod
/ triggerpod
About TRIGGERnometry:
Stand-up comedians Konstantin Kisin (@konstantinkisin) and Francis Foster (@francisjfoster) make sense of politics, economics, free speech, AI, drug policy and WW3 with the help of presidential advisors, renowned economists, award-winning journalists, controversial writers, leading scientists and notorious comedians.

[@triggerpod]

Subscribe for more Andrew Doyle content! Let us know what you want to see him cover next 👀

[@martinjackman2943]

I picked up the wrong beanie when leaving my local cafe The police were called and registered it as a "Non-crime HAT incident" ...

[@StillAliveAndKicking_]

I accidentally picked up someone else’s bag of maggots when fishing. The police recorded it as a non crime bait incident.

[@martinjackman2943]

Sura Fatihah is HATE Speech

[@hugod2000]

This was a really brilliant video. Thank you for sharing.

[@littlecatfeet9064]

If he hasn’t already talked about or to Tommy Robinson yet, he should.

[@docsavage8640]

Can we all acknowledge now that "hate crime" is just a euphemism they use to allow them to persecute anyone they disagree with politically?

[@taylorlibby7642]

Objectively there is no such thing as a "hate crime". There's just crime.

[@shaunwild8797]

I could see these hate crime laws being misused years ago.

[@IMDunn-oy9cd]

Accurate summation of current events.

[@joleaneshmoleane8358]

You and I and everyone reading this can acknowledge this truth. But it doesn’t matter. Nobody with any power or the political will to help change things is able to do anything other than what we’re already doing; talking and complaining about it. Seems not a single person on planet earth has any idea what to do beyond acknowledging and complaining.

[@SpiritzPlanet]

What Humza said: “It gives police an idea of where there might be spikes of hatred.” What he meant: “It gives my stormtroopers an idea of what dissidents are up to.”

[@trogglepope9792]

Because non-criminals are safer to harass than criminals.

[@LoneWolf-rc4go]

Plus they are easier to investigate as usually it's in the form of a complaint made against somebody. You already have the suspect for absolutely minimal effort.

[@AlexAnder-rv1gu]

@@LoneWolf-rc4go And those people are generally calm, mild-mannered folks who just take the police abuse. Whereas actual criminals are going to cause so many problems that police would much rather just go after the non-crimes.

[@terrathunderstorms3701]

Literally this. Cowards.

[@augustusomega4708]

the english have no backbone, I knew something was up when they legally enforced television licenses, they can do anything with you feeble minded chip munk sounding derelects

[@pixie3458]

Exactly.. Low hanging fruit

[@docsavage8640]

Imagine taking offense at someone's speech and contacting the police. Sounds like the kindergarten teacher's pet seeking a pat on the head for snitching on his classmates.

[@shaunwild8797]

It's exactly that. Remember the Nazi's got the youth to report on their parents if they spoke out of line.

[@taylorlibby7642]

It's especially awful because it's anonymous. You have no opportunity to face your accuser.

[@ClaireGarrard]

Precisely.

[@urbanegorilla6005]

Usually her classmates.

[@King_Noel]

In the UK it will have a big effect on teachers. We have something employers use called a DBS check that has several levels, most companies will check for a criminal record, but schools and other government departments will go deeper. At those deeper levels, they will find these none crimes recorded and its likely to cause problems with getting jobs for people. Also anyone that doesn't like their child teacher can cause serious damage to their careers very easily

[@carolyoung5529]

Jailed for words but kidnapping a child gets community service.....

[@geroldgrimel4811]

Neither of those things are true.

[@buildmotosykletist1987]

@@geroldgrimel4811 : Both, weirdly are true.

[@gkm3838]

@@geroldgrimel4811 Why don't you tell us why you think they aren't real.

[@geroldgrimel4811]

@@gkm3838 4:53 "Nobody has actually been arrested for non-crime." And crimes against children are universally and infamously the most harshly punished offense in the modern western world, for decades. I really can't fathom how deep under a rock you must be living to not know this. Do you want to ask me how I know that heat is hot next??

[@georgesoros6415]

This is what the people who were against the Peelers always said would happen. Give the police too much power, and they will always demand more. People all have a long list of things they don't like. Tough.

[@tomround8271]

Law abiding people are easier to arrest than criminals. Diversity hires can't be expected to tackle criminals 🤷‍♀️

[@Stephen-up3sd]

Hopefully with the resignation of Yousaf, the previous resignation of Sturgeon and the publication of the Cass report, the tide is beginning to turn on this nonsense.

[@Bapate-rh9be]

Has the law been withdrawn? No! Politicians get a boner on laws like this. Add to this that western nations have little to offer to their citicens and you have the perfect downturn.

[@taylorlibby7642]

Now is not the time to relax. They're not going to give up on their pernicious ideology just because of a couple of setbacks.

[@jon-xd7tl]

Yousaf may have gone, but his blasphemy law is still in place. Labour also voted for Yousaf's law. Will Labour introduce something similar for the UK if they are elected?

[@curlyspikes7114]

@@jon-xd7tl A dead cert

[@williamsulman2646]

​@@jon-xd7tllabour are definitely going to tighten up the speech laws. I have a funny feeling we are going to get blasphemy laws for the peaceful.

[@ephraimwinslow]

It's pronounced: "Totalitarianism." (Of the absolute worst "moral busybody" kind.)

[@catritz]

“ *Evil cannot create anything new, they can only corrupt and ruin what good forces have invented or made* ” ― J RR Tolkien “ *It has one iron rule: logic is an enemy and truth is a menace* ”

[@williamhensley8698]

Go after criminals....who can sometimes be difficult...or investigate non-crimes. Seems like a no brainer for a lazy cop.

[@cp4512]

The police are a joke. Pretending they’re short of resources, whilst having plenty of spare capacity for non-crime. Their budget could be cut if they have so much spare time fir this ‘hate crime’ rubbish.

[@TheWorldTeacher]

LAW ENFORCEMENT: For most of human history, there were no POLICE to enforce the law, because, until relatively recently, most humans resided in clans and/or tribes, in which every member of the social group knew each other far more intimately than do modern urbanites, and since the agricultural revolution, residing in farming communities or in small hamlets or towns in rural areas, where crime was less endemic, and also because ancient societies were self-policing. If a child committed a crime, rather than being carted-off to Juvenile Court by a member of the local police department, his or her mother would administer any necessary punishment. If the mother had broken the law, then the master of the house would discipline her. If the husband was to commit an offensive act, his father or employer would take punitive measures, and so on, all the way up to the head of that society (normally the chief priest or the king). Of course, this paradigm rests on the assumption that each discrete member of society enforced the law on an individual basis, and we can know for certain that they did so, to a very large extent, otherwise their populations would have perished, or at least have disintegrated to such an extent that their communities were plagued with serious problems. Just see how much wasteful infrastructure modern societies require, in order to perform the duties previously performed by all its collective citizenry! A massive police force would be practically superfluous in even a DECENT monarchy, what to mention under a holy and righteous king. When a nation (even a very populous one, such as has been the case in the past couple of centuries) is established on virtuous principles (“dharma”, in Sanskrit), the requirement of even a small police force would be highly-questionable, because it would be ensured that every single citizen receives proper training in dharma. It is far preferable that individuals adhere to the law voluntarily, rather than by brute force, wouldn’t you, the reader, agree? This explains the reason why modern bureaucracies tend to expend inordinate amounts of resources in order to keep watch over their own citizens. Due to their criminal nature, such illegitimate governments are unable to promulgate holy and righteous living, and so, are compelled to literally spy on their own people in order to minimize public unrest, whereas a true monarch will facilitate genuine spiritual teachers (brāhmaṇa) to spread dharma among the masses, beginning with their own seminarians/disciples, who in turn, will teach the head of the households of their communities, who in turn, will teach dharma to the individual members of their (extended) families. Many, if not MOST crimes, particularly acts of unmitigated violence, have their seed in poor child-rearing practices, especially highly-traumatic incidents such as neglect, physical mistreatment (that is, undue bodily harm beyond legitimate corporal punishment), and psychological abuse. In order to treat such unfortunate mental health outcomes, this author recommends regular psychotherapy, combined with yoga/meditation. Of course, this does not include that percentage of humanity who are afflicted with obvious psychological abnormalities, such as psychopathy. When the leaders of society (that is, genuine kings and genuine priests) ensure that dharma is promoted in their nation, such odious crimes will naturally be minimized. At present, human society is rapidly heading towards destruction, due to the lack of proper adherence to dharma.

[@andrewharrington7435]

They ignore nonce crime in favour on non crime.

[@HFamilyDad]

Its a fucking disgrace

[@siras2]

Every member of the College of Policing should be required to appear before a House of Commons Committee (so we get to hear what excuses they'll dream up), before being sacked and prosecuted.

[@HarryBuxley]

best comment ive read on the internet in years.

[@williamvorkosigan5151]

Investigating non crime gives them something to do while they do nothing about burglaries or stolen cars.

[@thoughtfulalbatros9683]

They’re not investigators, they’re data collectors They just ask questions, write things down and make tea until there’s enough to convict - glorified secretaries

[@janetrichardson2644]

Why have a police force who investigates none crimes but won’t investigate actual crimes if they don’t believe they can be resolved?

[@terrorbilly1]

Because they're being told to do so. It is a process of depleting police resources and doubling down on innocent citizens to create anarchy in the country. Soon enough there will be no "normal" people left. Just elite, police (who guards the elite) and criminals.

[@user-pb4xt4rg3z]

well, they can't be resolved if hte police won't invesigate them; so bullying the public is the more satisfying role.

[@thoughtfulalbatros9683]

They’re not investigators, they’re data collectors They just ask questions, write things down and make tea until there’s enough to convict - glorified secretaries

[@user-sc4mv2hu2c]

A Muslim worrying about antisemitism and homophobia....go figure?

[@georgetravers9333]

The pathway to invading a city Is to say "we are all just as pretty" If you lower your standard They'll join evenhanded With no morals in life, but self pity

[@paulbuswell6566]

I bet he's popular at Friday prayers

[@NeraBuffy]

Obviously using those words as code for islamophobia

[@youtubeyoutube936]

It’s a plan to undermine western society

[@anonymousonlineuser6543]

I am reporting you for hate crime bro.

[@loop1479]

The legal system has become as mad as a bag full of cats.

[@nyogtheeldritchgentleman]

1984 should be required reading for everyone, followed shortly by Goldberg’s “Liberal Fascism.”

[@briancox9357]

And, Fahrenheit 451

[@ddoherty5956]

Orwell wrote a great many books and there's lots to learn in all of them . "Down and out in Paris and London" would also be worth everyone reading as it looks very much like that is what we are being stared back towards.

[@docsavage8640]

Trouble is the Left reads them to get more ideas of how to implement their goals

[@rplea]

Particularly outrageous that these non-crimes that require neither victim, evidence, or investigation, are not only recorded without the knowledge of person involved but also then revealed to potential employers.

[@ankavoskuilen1725]

I have committed a non crime this morning: I have made myself a cup of coffee.

[@jasonwagner5571]

I’m I mistaken by equating these modern British policing tactics to the gestapo of the 30s and 40s? Quite scary…

[@frakismaximus3052]

Stasi

[@ddoherty5956]

Exactly that, they are just introducing it nice and slow so it arrives without us noticing.

[@docsavage8640]

How else can they catch and destroy non-criminals?

[@martindenham2207]

The joys of weak, immature, resentful people who seek to control others out of spite for whatever personal issues they don't have the maturity to deal with. This is never about solving the problem when the reaction to opposition is hostility, it's just about what's required to make such people feel better about themselves. Such people should not be allowed anywhere near positions of power, yet they seek positions of power to compensate for being weak. Exhausting.

[@4TheWinQuinn]

Very well put. I absolutely despise these people. Weak and controlling.

[@martindenham2207]

@@4TheWinQuinn Agreed

[@taylorlibby7642]

That whirring sound you keep hearing in the background is Orwell spinning in his grave.

[@clogs4956]

If all police are wrapped up investigating the “non-crimes” of the innocent, the real criminals can get on with serious crime undisturbed. Or maybe it’s just a grift…

[@angrytedtalks]

There is no law against hate. It is not illegal to be a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, a mysandrist or misogynist or to be religiously indictrinated. Crimes are _actions_ not opinions, not speech, not thought. The police are neglecting their duty to uphold the law if they are _ever_ involved in hate speech or butt hurt victim wannabes. Written hate speech may have consequences where it defames specific individuals, but it can never be illegal where the author is simply airing their opinions about categories or groups of people.

[@thevoxofreason8468]

Yeah, this is absolutely absurd. It's nonsensical.

[@totalcreativegaming6681]

It’s disturbing to think that Blighty is besoming or already has become an Orwellian nightmare similar to that of Russia, China, North Korea and several Islamic states, such as Iran & Palestine.

[@TheWorldTeacher]

I would MUCH rather reside in Iran than in the UK, that is for sure.

[@totalcreativegaming6681]

@@TheWorldTeacher Each to their own

[@robadzso]

Pre-Crime is here boys!

[@janpetersen7440]

A police force that goes woke invariably goes broke.

[@arfurwitt6221]

Of course they love it! If you investigate a non- crime and you get a non- result then you can claim it as a success.

[@aaronwjs]

Love from Commie Canada!

[@Robert-A-R]

The Canadians voted for Trudy…twice 🙈

[@AlexAnder-rv1gu]

@@Robert-A-R Thrice*

[@kevinstanley3581]

Don't forget that many in the opposition in Scotland voted for the hate crime Bill and recently voted against removing it from the statute book.

[@psychbomb7543]

I think the real question is, why are the police so stupid??🤔

[@TheWorldTeacher]

LAW ENFORCEMENT: For most of human history, there were no POLICE to enforce the law, because, until relatively recently, most humans resided in clans and/or tribes, in which every member of the social group knew each other far more intimately than do modern urbanites, and since the agricultural revolution, residing in farming communities or in small hamlets or towns in rural areas, where crime was less endemic, and also because ancient societies were self-policing. If a child committed a crime, rather than being carted-off to Juvenile Court by a member of the local police department, his or her mother would administer any necessary punishment. If the mother had broken the law, then the master of the house would discipline her. If the husband was to commit an offensive act, his father or employer would take punitive measures, and so on, all the way up to the head of that society (normally the chief priest or the king). Of course, this paradigm rests on the assumption that each discrete member of society enforced the law on an individual basis, and we can know for certain that they did so, to a very large extent, otherwise their populations would have perished, or at least have disintegrated to such an extent that their communities were plagued with serious problems. Just see how much wasteful infrastructure modern societies require, in order to perform the duties previously performed by all its collective citizenry! A massive police force would be practically superfluous in even a DECENT monarchy, what to mention under a holy and righteous king. When a nation (even a very populous one, such as has been the case in the past couple of centuries) is established on virtuous principles (“dharma”, in Sanskrit), the requirement of even a small police force would be highly-questionable, because it would be ensured that every single citizen receives proper training in dharma. It is far preferable that individuals adhere to the law voluntarily, rather than by brute force, wouldn’t you, the reader, agree? This explains the reason why modern bureaucracies tend to expend inordinate amounts of resources in order to keep watch over their own citizens. Due to their criminal nature, such illegitimate governments are unable to promulgate holy and righteous living, and so, are compelled to literally spy on their own people in order to minimize public unrest, whereas a true monarch will facilitate genuine spiritual teachers (brāhmaṇa) to spread dharma among the masses, beginning with their own seminarians/disciples, who in turn, will teach the head of the households of their communities, who in turn, will teach dharma to the individual members of their (extended) families. Many, if not MOST crimes, particularly acts of unmitigated violence, have their seed in poor child-rearing practices, especially highly-traumatic incidents such as neglect, physical mistreatment (that is, undue bodily harm beyond legitimate corporal punishment), and psychological abuse. In order to treat such unfortunate mental health outcomes, this author recommends regular psychotherapy, combined with yoga/meditation. Of course, this does not include that percentage of humanity who are afflicted with obvious psychological abnormalities, such as psychopathy. When the leaders of society (that is, genuine kings and genuine priests) ensure that dharma is promoted in their nation, such odious crimes will naturally be minimized. At present, human society is rapidly heading towards destruction, due to the lack of proper adherence to dharma.

[@donner101]

The police desperately need to track spikes in non crimes according to Yousless. They also need to find out where the antisemitism and the homophobia is happening. Well those two are easy the antisemitism is happening on the streets of London and in college campuses and the homophobia is happening at the Tavistock, inside Mermaids, inside Stonewall, inside the Scottish Green party and inside the SNP.

[@briancox9357]

And the mainstream media

[@beehive5835]

It would be interesting to see what would happen if a large % of "hate incidents" were lodged against the police & politicians.

[@movieknight68]

That's a great idea actually

[@terrorbilly1]

I believe this already happened to Yousless.

[@ddoherty5956]

Recycle bin I expect.

[@thebluelunarmonkey]

Flood the system. I was walking into a store and someone didn't hold the door open for me. I was shopping and a woman stared at me for two seconds.

[@fanfeck2844]

Every normal person should be honoured to have one. Police are a joke now

[@Hickalum]

I want one.

[@danielharrington8691]

The police are bound by law to do this. Blame the politicians / lawmakers.

[@raulthepig5821]

No. Police can refuse, they just don't want to because it is easier not to.

[@stitchjones7134]

'I was just following orders'

[@ddoherty5956]

The High Court have told them it's illegal, the Home Sec has told them to stop it. Their leaderships WEF paymasters have decided that we have no sovereignty and they want this kind of policing.

[@gkm3838]

@@raulthepig5821 Police cannot refuse a lawful direction. If the Government made it unlawful they are compelled to investigate.

[@VernonStradling]

How can something that's a non-crime be unlawful?

[@Handletaken4]

We cancelled our golf trip to Scotland next month and will go to Nebraska instead. Better weather, no Moeslumbs, great steaks, blonde women.

[@ankavoskuilen1725]

People in the olden days understood human nature better. The old laws knew people with a grudge would try to harm the people they held a grudge against.

[@xenialafleur]

"Next thing you know, they'll take my thoughts away" - Megadeth

[@elusivemayfly7534]

This is literal thought policing. There is SOMETHING these government officials are getting out of this beyond moral satisfaction

[@callmeishmael4870]

Simple answer: because it's easier than investigating real crime.

[@randywise5241]

"Truth looks like hate to those that want to believe the lies." Or want you to believe them. You are allowed to hate things. That is what free speech is about. It is not a crime in a free land to be offensive in your speech. It is offensive to say otherwise in a bad way. "If you cannot speak freely, you simple are not free." "Cutting out a man's tongue only proves you fear what he says." Truth is the only way to fight lies. Those that have no truth in them do not want the truth spread. It is against their desire to control.

[@Solidsnake0208]

Beautifully put

[@StevenSiew2]

Yes, but whose's truth? A's truth or B's truth. If a transwomen has "Their own version of TRUTH" then they are right and you are wrong. Society cannot function when different parts of it have different versions of TRUTH.

[@tagus100]

I want to go back to the time where calling the police because someone said something mean to you on the Internet would get you fined for wasting police resources.

[@zenRichard]

Surely the answer to this insanity is for everyone to report everyone else; the system will thus be rendered invalid.

[@ddoherty5956]

They will classify that as vexatious hate 🤣

[@danielshagman]

Comedian makes death threat, works on the comedy circuit that evening. Man says he hates Islam, gets arrested. Anybody telling you that we're "moving in the right direction" is gaslighting you, and you should tell them so.

[@homahak]

Another question is the “hate” bit. What if it’s just “dislike”? Or “not very keen on”? A “Non-Crime not very keen on incident” doesn’t quite cut it does it. Why have we bought into their language?

[@pauljohnson6233]

England = Big brother. Scotland = Biggest brother.

[@yorkie23D7]

"We need to check your thinking"??? Jeez that is sinister.

[@ph8077]

Because they've solved all of the actual crimes...duh!

[@Seekingsophia00]

😂😂

[@billyhughes9776]

Can we all just agree IT'S happening, and has been for some time. The doors of the trap are being closed one at a time slowly but surely.

[@ddoherty5956]

Whats more worrying is that the Prison service are already imprisoning non criminals for non crimes!

[@TheMasonator777]

Non-crime is the province of non-cops.

[@geoffbagwell34]

Why? Because Britain as the country my grandparents fought for no longer exists.

[@joleaneshmoleane8358]

I feel like it’s way too late for us to be asking these obvious questions. The time for questioning their policies, actions, ideologies is over. Long passed in fact. It’s time for something else, but bc everyone is such a coward and living in such deep denial, they likely have no idea what I could possibly mean.

[@internetfairy1]

This has to be a symptom of mass psychosis.

[@margaretgrey4238]

We need to keep track of each of these individuals and get them removed/sued from police force one at a time. Sinister criminal activities of those in charge of policing. Big Hug All...

[@scotswumin5502]

No supporter of Murdo but that was ridiculous. Utterly over reaching outrageous legislation

[@deemac9263]

Insanity.

[@dobythedog]

We are all sitting on our arses while this happens. Why are there not mass protests in the streets? I think the pressure cooker will eventually explode.

[@imperiencypher5584]

Progressivism poisons everything.

[@mikenewbold1699]

i had the police banging my door at midnight last saturday night over a facebook sale where the buy claims i sold them a broken item i didn't. madness

[@GiacomoSorbi]

The most worrisome part is that the police is keeping a borderline illegal activity going, despite being told not to do so by both elected representatives of the public and, well, sheer common sense. Oh, and also that they are basically ignoring any other crime that does not reach the front page of a newspaper and so will put the consistent slack of a growing number of them in the spotlight: right now in London, they seem to ignore almost everything short of a murder to focus on this garbage.

[@robadzso]

Well said, Brother.

[@Omegaspeedmaster69]

Society has become more angry and demoralised by high crime due to the actions of the justice system. I dont know who's really behind this,but I do know it's no accident.

[@homewall744]

It's easier and safer to track non-crimes, so that's what government agents will naturally seek to do instead.

[@J1mston]

So glad that “Doyley” has become a regular contributor to Trig, his input is always worth listening to.

[@FAArchbold]

Free speech!!!!! Needs restoring now!!!!!!

[@RevDiscarnateEntity]

Waste of police time and our money. Who voted for this? 🎉

[@jdlotus8253]

The College of Policing needs to be prosecuted for acting contrary to Law and directing police to act contrary to Law.

[@procyonlotor1906]

Motive? To increase their budget!

[@sofabuddha]

This was an attempt to introduce a blasphemy law.

[@pollyparrot9447]

'...no evidence of hatred other than the perception of the victim' would be better said as, '...other than the perception of the complainant'.

[@philipk917]

Thanks Andrew...seems to be no end to how low things have gotten. Thanks for being a reporting voice. ❤🧡❤

[@truthmatters5209]

We have seen where this leads. Policing thoughts and speech is what happened in Stalinist Russia only last century, sending hundreds of thousands to the Gulag. This would get even worse under Starmer and his left wing loons. Time to vote Reform UK.

[@derekspitz9225]

Glad Abu Hamsa lost his no confidence vote. But it makes no difference who replaces him. The crazy SNP will continue to drag Scotland down the Stasi-style identitarian, authoritarian rabbit hole. The only hope for Scotland is for the Scottish people to remove the SNP at the GE later this year🤞

[@yvonnerichardson6335]

Excellent thank you for pulling all this together.

[@TheCompleteGuitarist]

I would highly recommend that anyone *not* wanting to get into trouble with the police take up a less contentious activity such as car theft, breaking and entering, mugging, shop lifting and fraud.

[@ecmorgan69]

I thought Canada was a laughingstock, but the Metro PD said, “Hold my beer.”

[@thestandupphilosophers]

There's no such thing as a 'non crime,' when they've already decided that you are guilty, guilty of something...

[@paulsmith982]

Yes, the college of policing needs to be abolished, but for that to happen, we need politicians who don't bend over whenever some minority or other demands it.

[@rogeralsop3479]

Extraordinary!

[@nothappygilmore7634]

As an immigrant and a traditional liberal, I'm happy to see more right leaning governments winning elections everywhere. We need to put a stop to this garbage and prioritize free speech. Without free speech society degrades.

[@terrorbilly1]

There is no free speech as long as hate speech exists.

[@AlexAnder-rv1gu]

LOL! You realize that The UK has been ruled BY the 'conservative' party for years now, right?

[@olitonottero7620]

Great Share !!

[@mrror8933]

Police investigating non-crime is like a chef cooking with non-foods.

[@paulsonornot]

Don't call me Surely!

[@roblewis8227]

Non-crime on the rise!

[@FunderDuck]

Does law enforcement have the legal right to arbitrarily add any statement to a citizen’s record if there isn’t a crime or interaction with law enforcement? Seems like there is a global trend away from community policing (on and offline) into more of a centralized intelligence approach.

[@BirdingwithNick]

The College of Policing should be disbanded immediately and all its members prosecuted.

[@peterbumper2769]

Two reasons; It is low hanging fruit. A citizen is less aware of police tactics than a criminal, will confess their "crime". "Crime" solved, looks good on end-of-year report Easier to silence people who are political trouble makers

[@davidbarlow350]

The fact that the public are playing the police's game,reporting and going along with this,is a sad indictment of what British society has become. A few years ago these people would have simply been told to f*ck of and not not be so bloody stupid.

[@theunknownatheist3815]

Those of us in America 🇺🇸- if we can’t fix this at the Ballot Box 🗳️- we may have to resort to the Cartridge Box 📦

[@eugenechelsea]

Well said !

[@geraldcoffey3303]

Time to go. Time to go

[@antirnator8194]

The Police becoming complaints departments is great idea for the wellbeing of society. Building a society based on resentment is a winning strategy.

[@waltk7624]

It is much easier going after law biding citizens than actually going after dangerous criminals. Woke cowards 😢

[@BadgerDom]

Missing people, RTC’s… the police have always dealt with ’non-crime’. The obsession in hate crime is the issue, and the government who have forced them to via their oppressive crime recording rules.

[@SoulFlyer133]

All the people need to do is report every single time they're even remotely offended by somebody, to the point where every single citizen has at least 50 non crimes under their name. Start with politicians