Why Artificial Intelligence Matters - Eric Schmidt

[@loveplay1983]

The definition of job loss only suits developed areas, you could easily identify the issues that automation will bring to those who are living in poor developing places, unless, some portions of the richness give up the notion of the monetary subject.

[@nishanthmudkey5055]

At least there is one guy who has spoken some sense. Thank you

[@geoffread2707]

Wow! So many cranks making comments. We need to improve education standards. Hopefully AI will help us to do that.

[@profyeah25]

did you see the lady's "I'm sorry face" at 26:21 ? I love it, when Eric speaks

[@venkatbabu186]

People usually work for special purpose enhancement areas. Power management traffic management distribution management etc immediate automation etc is AI areas of advancements.

[@KristerNielsen]

Technology can't change quickly enough if you ask me

[@almightyalious2804]

it is at lightning fast level, do a research yourself and you'll be shocked my brother

[@sdprz7893]

Yeah you definitely don't work in tech, things are changing way too fast. We need to slow down, we don't really know what we're doing.

[@arthurrobey4945]

Like to work? Let's take a vote. Do you like to work or do you have to work?

[@baronvonbasscat]

*STOP THE CENSORSHIP*

[@tterb777]

People freaking out about jobs. As he states, "AI won't replace jobs it will replace tasks". Further, "AI will increase 'job' opportunities" due to making more possibilities. WHY do people fear walking out their door and just simply dismiss possibilities. I don't understand this fear for the future. Seriously, I'd be more fearful this very moment that trump starts a nuclear war or makes americans hate each other right now, today, than AI 20 years from now...

[@matthewbaumann630]

What jobs will there be if AI can design better products than humans?

[@aliqazilbash5231]

I am a puppy in real life but I can tell the difference between fake love and real love. you can't fool me from a distance, man

[@singletron3722]

When they start rolling out A.I. more mainstream like sell driving cars and the limitless other applications, we will shortly see an unprecedented growth of wealth inequality.

[@renestjacques1]

Beautiful vision ..!!

[@sameerchhetri9466]

We want the Sergey Brin talking on AI .

[@tblsaci]

When AI really happens, we stop producing us.

[@CandidDate]

It's been called 'the last invention.'

[@valiok9880]

Real powerful persona

[@husnainanwaar1992]

space x will connect the planet with free internet by 2025

[@rtonce]

People are softened, weakened, so that we no longer need to live much, walk so far, think so hard or experience life, but robots do, and we no longer communicate in person much, but our cells are our go betweens. Tech evolves, and as we outsource our own physical and mental capacities, we regress...to a dumb, useless and extinct state. The Answer is: All governments MUST tax all robots. A single robot to be defined as something that replaces a single person's job. If one robot replaces 10 people, then it is taxed 10 times, and this tax should equal the amount it would otherwise cost to keep a human worker, and this tax revenue needs to go ENTIRELY and DIRECTLY into providing a basic income to ALL countries people. It should never be manipulated or invested or in any way intercepted before equal division and each individual benefits. This is the only path of equalization, because boycotting, protests or discussion is already lost. What you can do? Don't LIKE this comment, but paste it, discuss it, in person, at lunch with anyone, instead of discussing the weather. Suggest it repeatedly and relentlessly to each and every political representative whenever they are present...I mean unless in the near future you plan to leave land and live on a boat with your children, and simply watch from a distance as the world is further dumbed down and devours each other further. ELON THIS IS THE BALANCING REGULATION NEEDED!

[@arnom1885]

It's a vision. I just don't agree with it at all! Think of the self driving car. It will be there and it will be here soon. (3 years). This not only means the end of drivers around the globe. But also, since less accidents are expected, less repairmen, less aftermarket, less insurance and eventually, since only a few will want to own/drive a car, less car production. (A car stands still for around 95% of the day So theoretically we could do with 95% less cars in the world). Now think of agriculture. Think of healthcare, education, mining, banking, legal, heck! Maybe even politics! (IT-guys, you're safe if you're a developer). About the fertility-issue: there is one. It just won't be a big issue within the next 12 years. Also it is expected in 20 years or so we can integrate with computers/AI. "Upload" our brain so to say. Who needs reproduction when you can have orgies in the virtual world which will feel just as good as 'the real thing'?

[@profyeah25]

interesting

[@Khannea]

I don't trust him, at all. There's something not all right with this guy.

[@aleksandrasignatavicius6772]

I often talk in same way and people don't trust me because they don't see emotion. Reason why he talks like that is because he is arrogant about what he knows and he talked many times about this before, because of that it also seems memoraized. sorry for grammar

[@christheother9088]

Absolutely.

[@Axelvad]

You have have a point, but hes actually on point in every regard except the likeablility wich is not why he's up on stage