Рет қаралды 4,602
"Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this subsection (3), murder in the second degree is a class 3 felony where the act causing the death was performed upon a sudden heat of passion, caused by a serious and highly provoking act of the intended victim, affecting the defendant sufficiently to excite an irresistible passion in a reasonable person; but, if between the provocation and the killing there is an interval sufficient for the voice of reason and humanity to be heard, the killing is a class 2 felony." - Colorado 18-3-103 (3)(b) C.R.S.
The first part of a 20 page essay I wrote a couple years ago will be in the comments below. Part of this video is loosely based on this Dr. Todd Grande video:
• Chris Watts - Familici...
That video is funny because he is SO CLOSE to figuring this out that it's almost hard to watch. If he just for one second thought, well, wait a second, if this profile matches the wife, not the husband, we know for sure she isn't the one who killed the kids, right? What? Chris claimed for the initial 2 months that the controlling, matriarchal, love-starved, emotionally tortured wife killed the kids?!?! OK hold on a second, let me look at this again." I mean he starts off the video by saying we know for sure Chris killed everyone, so it's really disappointing. There is no physical evidence whatsoever linking him to the physical deaths of those girls. There were two capable adults in that house that night and only one of them was ever interrogated or otherwise questioned. We didn't get to analyze Shanann's nonverbal body language in her media interviews or in her interrogations. She instantly gets a free pass from ALL scrutiny because she got murdered. It's morally impermissible to blame the victim, they all say. But can't someone be a victim of one crime and the guilty perpetrator of another? So is it really "blaming the victim", or is it a multi-part analysis?