Why do philosophers hate women?

[@allsouls5997]

Any truth spoken is called hate.

[@Rem-n7m]

Facts

[@allsouls5997]

@@Calcium-mn9eq that's what haters say of truth. Truth is not pleasant to the hater. One day you will know better and see the light.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@Calcium-mn9eq "And if he were compelled to look straight at the light, would he not have a pain in his eyes which would make him turn away to take refuge in the objects of vision which he could see, and which he would conceive to be in reality clearer than the things which were now being shown to him?" - Plato, The Republic Btw, do you only have emotional reponses, or can you actually argue?

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@Calcium-mn9eq Did you delete the other coversation, because you couldn't prove me wrong?

[@Calcium-mn9eq]

@@josef-gorosinhuf5003 I deleted the whole comment because KZbin is not letting me post my true expressions. The censorship is annoying. It took me about 2-3 days to post you that comment where I included "contd. below", and I still had to break it in bits. It's so frustrating. I may have to delete my comments here as well and totally stop posting my comments on KZbin completely, if the censorship continues, since KZbin can't handle someone giving 1diot!c men like you a taste of their own medicine. But it permits men to @buse women. That's male privilege right there; it's fine if men do it to women, but not fine if women or sensible men do it back to silly men like you.

[@neindanke6526]

Wow. So the red pill is basically older then 2000 years

[@Calcium-mn9eq]

Yes. And it has always been harmful to women. That's why feminism movement began, because women were being oppressed by men. Women had to gain their freedom, because they're humans too. Thanks to feminism.

[@myusername3689]

I'd say it's much older than even that. Perhaps maybe even before written language.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

It was once called common sense.

[@Calcium-mn9eq]

@@josef-gorosinhuf5003 Only people with no common sense will call something as absurd as just hating a group of people simply because of their genitalia common sense. Your statements betray you. They prove you absolutely lack common sense.

[@Quwucuqin]

​@@josef-gorosinhuf5003 we don't say that anymore we keep them under the illusion

[@aaronfon18]

And the modern liberated women proved all of them right.

[@n30418]

How? Because the last time I checked women these days are more educated and earn more money than men.

[@Calcium-mn9eq]

@@aaronfon18 And men like you proved them all wrong. But they're too dead and dumb to know it.

[@Quwucuqin]

Exactly

[@Harold-ph1kk]

@@Quwucuqin Correct!

[@exoticgya]

Y’all have dehumanized and controlled us since forever. Men are the problem

[@laurasteif86]

They hated women long before they became philosophers. You would be amazed at how much thinking you do in isolation. No responsibilities, no constant interruptions, and no worries about the future. Silence and time.

[@gilgamesh7652]

Is funny that all religions and philosophies "hates" women, like some force works to make everyone around the world to have the same base conclusion about women

[@399d6]

In my opinion creator of this video should be ashamed for calling them mysogynistic. If you were learn by women to call intelligent men mysogynistic, then thats your problem, that u cant get basic stuff to mind

[@Rem-n7m]

It's not our fault that women are not programmed to see past a certain level. They are short sighted, easily manipulated and have seemingly evolved to prefer lies over truth.

[@henry6525]

The creator of this video has actually expressed his views but....to avoid being attached by the woke he used the word "misogynistic" to cover his feelings.

[@HugoSanchez-qq2oh]

But they ain’t wrong though

[@Rem-n7m]

Exactly.... I already commented that the reason women will never understand these words is because there is something in their brains that blocks them out when it comes to witnessing their own behavior.

[@mitsume_slay]

Lok your mom

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@Rem-n7m Hence the meme with no accountability.

[@Alejandrokosmidis-q2j]

He was never wrong.

[@denkverlag1]

And as so often… these great thinkers were all correct.

[@Misanthropic_hellhound]

They forgot the bloodlust part

[@anab0lic]

They didn't hate them, they just recognized their limitations.

[@Correction-zl2oe]

Hate is a jewish boogeyman no man hates women God made them to be our helpmates to submit to us as IF WE WERE GOD so the degree to which we RESENT THEM is justified as its the degree to which they have failed Gods explicit purpose for them to serve us so they are more then worthy of the scorn and derision and whatever you humans perceive as hate period.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

​@@Correction-zl2oe This is a matter of philosophy, not religion. Please base your arguments on empirical evidence.

[@blugaledoh2669]

Saying that women are meant to please men is not recognising their ‘limitations’.

[@anab0lic]

@@blugaledoh2669 you clearly haven't studied this subject.

[@leebennett1821]

The World is built and maintained by men if men just walked away the world would fall apart

[@marykk6246]

Modern times has proven this by how irrational chaotic women are today

[@prk30]

Women are chaotic by nature. They are inherently confused beings and that is why women have never built civilizations at any time, because they are incapable of ordering or hierarchizing, which is rooted in their contempt for higher values.

[@kayakMike1000]

Women have always been irrational and chaotic. They just recently added uncooperative.

[@pollyandgus]

cmon mary, then that makes you irrational and chaotic too. then why bother commenting when you yourself believe your comment holds no water... putting your own people down earns you no points

[@rutrakainmeiez5107]

You can either understand them or love them Can't have both

[@S.D.323]

So you don't love your mother?

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@S.D.323 He meant romantically, or are you trying to suggest that an Oedipus complex is somehow healthy?

[@gilgamesh7652]

​@@S.D.323 Who see his own mother as a woman at base?

[@S.D.323]

@@josef-gorosinhuf5003 that isnt healthy but neither is having contempt for half the human race

[@anab0lic]

@@S.D.323 its not really contempt, its understanding their limitations. And id argue that very much is healthy.

[@aspiringscientist1616]

Where's Schopenheur?

[@BigasBorba]

I think he already approached Schopenhauer's view, I might be mistaken. He is a special case since he wrote and essay about women

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

Too brutal.

[@CognitioOccultorum-X]

All the smartest people throughout history made the same conclusion regarding women, doesn't matter where, when and how they lived. Modern times are no different, expect now it is forbidden to make such comments, so the philosophers of today refrain from doing so. To call them misogynists is just plain ignorance. If interpretations of observations are true and verifiable, it shouldn't matter who's feelings they might hurt, they must be communicated.

[@spiderrr8175]

just because some smart people from historic times made similar conclusions about women doesn't make it justifiable. Just like how great leaders from history could've made a great impact in societies but could still justify slavery or even owned slaves. Society has progressed and evolved so much since then with new discoveries and information that is easily available. It's quite obvious that you've been hurt before, and I'm sorry that's happened to you, but it still doesn't justify or give you the right to rationalize hate towards an entire gender and make gross generalizations.

[@CognitioOccultorum-X]

@@spiderrr8175 Saying that I've been hurt before is the same as saying that I've been breathing all my life. It doesn't mean anything. Everyone, no matter the gender, creed, race, socio-economic status, etc., have been hurt before. Including you. This world is not a very nice place. And nobody's hating on anybody. Since all the institutions which held society together have been removed, I think we should be allowed to address it, without someone from the crowd yelling "Hate speech!" The point being is that it's not worth to deal with women in a long term romantic setting anymore. More and more men are realizing this and opting out. And as usual with these things, the thinking element of society is the first to acknowledge the fact, and slowly the rest are following. You can't stop it.

[@spiderrr8175]

@CognitioOccultorum-X You come across as a man who has let his past mistakes/heartbreaks contaminate his mind and well-being and refuse to better himself. You believe hiding will make yourself feel like you are above people when, in reality, you can not stand the sight of seeing someone being happier than you. They probably have gone through tragedies and heartbreaks just as much as you do, but they've had the will to move on. You hide on the internet promoting hate and have a warped idea of what "the truth" is, but you don't actually care enough to look into the nuance of everything. You just care about your own narrative. You just want more people to feel as bitter as you because you are bitter yourself.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@spiderrr8175 What is the truth. Tell me wise one. If possible with numbers, facts and data. Not a Schoppenhauer guy, but your "You just care about your own narrative" statement goes both ways. You come across as a man who has let his past mistakes/heartbreaks contaminate his mind and well-being and fled from that part of his mind and refuses to better himself. You believe confronting will make yourself feel like you are above people when, in reality, you can not stand the sight of seeing someone being more content than you. They probably have gone through tragedies and heartbreaks just as much as you do, but they've had the will to face reality. You hide on the internet promoting false love and have a warped idea of what "the truth" is, but you don't actually care enough to look into the nuance of everything. You just care about your own narrative. You just want to feel more alive by acting superior to others, because you are uncertain you chose the wright path. You see? Without substance, I can write something like this, too. Let's stop the gaslightning and argument properly.

[@theunknown8735]

​@@spiderrr8175immediately resorted to Ad hominem. Wonderful

[@JohnAloah]

Most philosophies were unattractive looking and they had negative experiences with them so they understand human nature better then beautiful people. This is no mystery for those unqualified for love

[@nnconfomiststoic888]

Only physically good looking peeps are worthy of love. 😂. What if your partner is gorgeous but abuses you manipulates you gaslights you? Is that love? Like women you only value appearance looks. Like women your thinking is also shallow, frivolous superficial irrational. You partner needs to have qualities gratitude integrity rationality, only then you'll have peace and harmony otherwise appearance is always deceptive. You can't also think deeply and profoundly like these philosophers.

[@johnanderson6946]

nice projection lol

[@MCADHD-rf5kl]

@@nnconfomiststoic888 Yes, true, all of that you pointed out, after the pre requirement of being sexually attractive. What this guy called "fit for love.".

[@SenEmChannel]

1.Philosopher is usually ugly. 2. Women hate ugly men. 3. Ugly men resent women. 4. Ugly create philosophy to bring women down so they can feel better than them.

[@Drottteve]

Trying to twist it right according to the taste of the day, ridiculous.

[@DESKWERKSJB]

Aren't we talking about "Immanuel Kant" @1:50??

[@eljamman1]

Man, I cracked up 😂

[@rolandwhittle8527]

KZbin has a serious problem with subtitles I've noticed 😂😂

[@allotimohamed5043]

amazed that the channel try to explain the harsh truth of women to not be banned by youtube.

[@drakecliff8378]

Nowadays youtube is catering to redpill audiences because they want to make money out them

[@henry6525]

this is why he used the word misogynistic as a cover....

[@u-8743]

I don't think misogyny is the right term. That means hatred of. Where is the hate? Why is it hateful to say we have differences?

[@eohrefare7346]

I wonder why… ?? Maybe because it’s an obvious truth obfuscated by open lies.

[@mrwojna]

What I’ve come to understand about them is this. Many can be extremely unreasonable. The word extremely is not extreme enough. I’ve been romantically entangled with some who, when they were in such an unreasonable mood, would sooner allow themselves to be clobbered by an 18 wheeler than step out of its way if it were I who warned them it was bearing down on them.

[@Correction-zl2oe]

women would drag us all to hell before admitting they are wrong

[@nnconfomiststoic888]

I have a sibling, totally irrational ungrateful a total maniac who shaved her head bald. I'm even ashamed to call her my sister, drives me up the wall screaming obscene words.

[@helvete_ingres4717]

'their views reflected and reinforced the prevailing social norms' - imagine someone doing that, whoa

[@nathanforrest3483]

Because they're smart.

[@hanson2649]

As a girl, these philosophers are right

[@Correction-zl2oe]

And as a girl your saying so has less then 0 bearing on truth as many have said something is more likely true if women dont like it so understand an aberration like u claim to be should be viewed with extreme skeptism

[@hanson2649]

@@Correction-zl2oe facts are facts. Facts don't care about what you like

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@Correction-zl2oe To quote Musashi: "You kneel before truth or live a lie."

[@iforget6940]

​@hanson2649 Care to explain miss

[@romitkankariya8355]

I appreciate your bold acceptance in this man hating, women favouring society of today

[@Skylinez999]

The only hate here is the title of this video

[@3lp536]

in my family, women stay at home, cook food, help to educate the kids, take care of us, while the men simply bring the food and money, but they both make the rules about the household.

[@mk-mq1od]

Today we can see they were right

[@juliusspartacus5437]

Why? Because by nature they are objective thinkers utilizing logic and reason. Take the emotion and political correctness out of analyzing the nature of women, and.....

[@AppleJacksCereal]

Instead of trying to psycho-analyze them, why don’t you contend with their claims?

[@anab0lic]

because their claims cant be contended with.

[@Dennis-nc3vw]

Crimes rates and ADHD diagnosis show its not that simple. Men and women both have their strengths and weaknesses. But I think a belief in female inferiority has been a good counter the men's innate, ruthless desire to pander to women (like any male animal, our most base instinct after eating and sleeping is to protect and impress the female). Until we can confront that, we need the other to function as a society.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@Dennis-nc3vw To quote Nietzsche: "The war between the sexes is eternal. There will only be peace once one calls himself master."

[@Abby-xk1pr]

Generalization is never smart.

[@pinkopalinko1840]

Aristotel was right.

[@davidmock9040]

Stating that these philosophers were simply a product of the time seems like some pretty shallow thinking, when so many of their ideas and opinions are still talked about in the modern day. Just saying.

[@Nastymedicine]

Everyone is free to an opinion.

[@peterroberts4509]

Because they sacrificed brains for beauty

[@Misanthropic_hellhound]

I'm pretty eve didn't like her role. Lilith was right when she left adam forever. Adam really fucked up in the garden when he wanted a mate that was lesser.

[@phantom8926]

​@@Misanthropic_hellhoundwhere can I learn more about this?

[@HaxxorElite]

​@@phantom8926bible?

[@Misanthropic_hellhound]

@phantom8926 paradise lost talks about eve feeling sad and hated her role

[@santythehamster]

The vast majority of people are zombies, functionally illiterate. Don't think you're special just because you think a little (I say the same to myself

[@timitarecom]

as muslim we believe god sayed 1400 years ago in the quran about women "They are a garment for you, and you are a garment for them"

[@deanbarucco9214]

I found the title of the video laughably absurd and ignorant, it's not that the ancient philosophers had contempt and hatred towards women, they just understood how women intrinsically and naturally operated, they understood female nature and if you look at certain statistics that pertains to females and how modern females are conducting themselves and behaving in modern society, you would see that they are one hundred percent correct in their assessments and not wrong, and the way philosophers describe females, they've always been that because female nature is not synonymous to time period and location, it's synonymous to what there biology and what there intrinsic nature is and what there natural desires are.

[@Fluxdeken]

The only reason is : neuroscience (evolution). All those philosophers are simply more into details of human behaviour, noticing all women “features”.

[@rolandwhittle8527]

Before i went out into the wide world i use to be sympathetic to women and various ethnic groups that we were all equal and the same with same sense of capabilities. But now after many decades all that is s blown away. Most women struggle with everything just only care about making image to impress lesser men below them. Since they have had total freedoms same with different ethnic peoples there has been no great world changing achievements by them in the world. And the world has been a worse place because of that. This isnt misogynistic this is reality those philosophers saw that long ago sadly we cant change anything now.

[@anab0lic]

we can change things, don't give up the fight for a better future brother.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@anab0lic No need to fight or give up. Stuff happens without your consens. Just enjoy the meet grinder.

[@anab0lic]

@@josef-gorosinhuf5003 stuff happens as the result of people taking action.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@anab0lic And why do people take action?

[@anab0lic]

@@josef-gorosinhuf5003 to enact change.

[@JL-yt5hy]

Contempt for women around the world is universal and deeply institutionalized, unfortunately.

[@kinghermit]

Yes. I've been around both good women and bad women in my life. So while I can understand the contempt some men feel about women, it doesn't justify their hate of all the women. Calling them inferior in many ways are just plain crazy, since a lot of my teachers are intelligent women. If men allowed women to have the same opportunities as them, overtime injustice against men will be eradicated since society finally agreed that women should always be held accountable because they're capable of rational thoughts. Meanwhile, a lot of men whine about women's wrongdoings but at the same time doesn't realize that the injustices they received are the results of heavy societal expectations of given to men because they're regarded as the only sex who is capable of rational thoughts and actions (thus responsibilities). Misogynists wanted women to take accountability but at the same time regarded them as incapable of rational thought. Which is a contradiction since if women aren't capable of rational thoughts, like senile or mentally disabled people, then they should not bear responsibility or held accountable for their actions.

[@fujithegreat6069]

​@kinghermit Hey, you're being too rational for a man. We can't have that here 😠. Seriously tho, I agree. I'm a dude, but I've met more scummy dudes than I've met scummy women. This whole division of the sexes is just plainly dumb. Is it so hard to get along?

[@secretagent4610]

It’s literally the opposite in most of the world today, but believe whatever lies you want.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@secretagent4610 It's concerning to see that certain trends on social media seem to normalize hostility toward men, often with little pushback.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

That's a thought-provoking issue. It might be worth considering why this dynamic exists, even though throughout history, men have often been seen as biologically or culturally inclined to protect, provide for, and care for women.

[@arvyreyes7782]

Because they get rejected a lot

[@weirdotter930]

If men are not the superior, then who is?

[@Son_of_the_Sun]

They were right though. Iv never met a woman that really cared about virtue or philosophy at all. They are naturally more emotional and therefore lack the self control necessary to pursue such things

[@DanielCayo-uj3pg]

@@Son_of_the_Sun exactly, look at these only fans models. And also they would literally murder their own kids whenever it suits them or when they feel like it, but would intentionally get pregnant when there’s a draft. They don’t care about being righteous at all, most of them are selfish cowards who focuses on expediency and their emotions only.

[@juliettechanlon4610]

I disagree with you, as a woman I am interested in philosophy, and in high school my philosophy teacher was a woman and most of the people in my class became interested in philosophy thanks to her. Maybe you haven’t met enough women, or they don’t feel comfortable enough to share deep thoughts with you.

[@georgesmith5201]

@@juliettechanlon4610 In my experience.. women seem to severely limit themselves on what philosophical subjects they tend to focus on. Men certainly have a more colorful pallet - you can't really predict what arguments they will put forth or how they will intermix broader themes in philosophy. Half the time a woman, who is "into philosophy", focuses on feminism, abortion, or their opinions on social justice. - If a woman told me she is into philosophy and starts to argue about value theory.. I would be surprised. If a man told me he is into philosophy and starts to argue about reality, as it relates to him being a man.. I would be equally surprised.

[@joyce4193]

they just dont want to talk to you

[@ChadNorwood-g1v]

@@juliettechanlon4610 women dont really have deep thoughts like men do because there is no reason for them to think deeply. Even if we forget all other factors like brain differences on this point alone can by argued. People develop deep thoughts because they have problems that wont ever go away unless they themselves find a solution for them. Since women's problems are all solved by men even taking all iniciative to do so a woman doesnt ever have to think deeply and thats why they dont.

[@marcpadilla1094]

No. Equality is not an accomodation of opportunity or outcome. A natural liability. Irrational.

[@D_402S]

Because the truth is often hated by the world

[@Freebot3]

Emmanuel Cvnt, greatest Western philosopher there ever was lol

[@anab0lic]

lol

[@achantus1]

Muslims still understand how things should be.

[@rustcohle2406]

maybe one of the reasons why they were "misogynistic" is because maybe they were right? if most of geniuses of history came to a similar conclusion about a subject maybe thats something to consider

[@Fandar]

And all those that came to the conclusion came from one half of the population against the other half.

[@rustcohle2406]

@@Fandar I mean the half they came from represents an overwhelming majority of history's geniuses that made advancements in pretty much every major field maths physics philosophy etc

[@Alejandrokosmidis-q2j]

Aristotle dedicated his life to the search for truth and wisdom, everything he said is true.

[@fasces_]

Or they were just eight

[@gwang3103]

It's interesting to note that in Hinduism, femininity is REVERED. Durga and Kali are among the most powerful of all Hindu goddesses. SHAKTI, always described as feminine, is a universal power that underlies and sustains all existence, and is even equated with pure consciousness. I also seem to have read somewhere that men who despise the fairer sex do so because women can make babies, can bring new life into the world, but not men. Who are therefore disposable.

[@Dennis-nc3vw]

But we're told pregnancy is a great curse that we're supposed to pity women for, so...

[@theunknown8735]

How are they going to make babies without sperm? Your last sentence very close to penis envy. Utter horsesh*t

[@redx12ae33]

funny that hindu laws are the way they are then huh. such things as Sati, women paying dowry rather than men among others especially what with their cultures overly sexual obsession and women often having to endure disgusting treatment from so-called men from there... ye hinduism is the culture that reveres women... bruh

[@henry6525]

Sure, this is why in India, women are generally subservient to man.

[@lambert801]

The man has equal part in procreation. Good luck having babies on your own, women!

[@Simonfromtheblock]

Emmanuel who? :D

[@LaMach420]

Based and mysoggykneepilled

[@oriraykai3610]

Aristotle wasn't "much of western philosophy", he was ONE defective Greek. 😆

[@Hmvc-mx8wv]

"Aristotle was ONE defective Greek" - Angry Woman

[@Fandar]

These philosophers like Aristotle never really accomplished anything anyways. They were just popular. Popularity doesn't mean someone has actually done anything good.

[@jailbirdblues2414]

Or maybe these geniuses were simply correct and we should listen to them

[@Lazarusgaweseb2438]

They knew that giving women more than the rights they need had serious concequences to men.

[@thelastofthedinosaurs]

Philosophers: I cant understand it so it is just piece of meat.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

Not quite true. It's more like, you either understand them or you love them.

[@Quwucuqin]

Mf thinks he is more wise then the people who created the foundation of wisdom

[@georgetapia1010]

Also they probably had major mommy issues. I read that Rousseau, one of the examples mentioned, had a masochistic tendency to misbehave so his mother would beat him. This is from his own autobiographical works btw.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@georgetapia1010 The use of "probably" in your statement already suggests some uncertainty. Psychologically, masochism and a mother complex aren't actually related. Masochism is about deriving pleasure from pain, while a mother complex is more about emotional dependency and unresolved conflicts with the mother figure. Rousseau describes in his autobiographical works how, as a child, he found a kind of satisfaction when he was punished by an older woman, Madame de Vercellis, because it meant he was getting her attention. But it's worth noting that his mother died when he was very young, so he never experienced direct punishment from her. Rousseau often dramatizes his experiences and tells these stories to reflect his longing for attention rather than actual masochistic tendencies.

[@D_402S]

Bro thinks he's greater than Aristotle 😂

[@JuryNullificationNOW]

Total propaganda video designed to demonize the traditional roles that have ensured the success of humanity.

[@FromTheWombTotheGrave]

“Traditional roles” were only in The 1900s Thought history It was only 40% of men reproducing While most men were gonna be alone. It was the strongest tribes getting all the women.

[@HaxxorElite]

​@@FromTheWombTotheGravebullshit brother

[@FromTheWombTotheGrave]

@@HaxxorElite nice argument

[@HaxxorElite]

@@FromTheWombTotheGrave i know right :D

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@FromTheWombTotheGrave In various ancient societies across the world, monogamous marriage and traditional gender roles were the norm for most of the population: Ancient Egypt: While elites practiced polygamy, most Egyptians followed monogamy. Husbands provided through work, while wives managed the household and children. Ancient Greece and Rome: Monogamy was the standard, with men as providers and women in charge of the domestic sphere. Public roles for women were limited, reinforcing traditional family structures. Ancient China (Han Dynasty): Confucian values emphasized monogamy for most, with men as the heads of the household and women managing domestic duties and raising children. Ancient India (Vedic Period): Hindu traditions promoted monogamous marriage, with men as protectors and providers, and women responsible for household management and family care. Ancient Japan (Heian Period): Monogamy was common, with men working in public roles and women managing the home and family, particularly in noble families. These examples demonstrate that throughout ancient history, monogamy and traditional gender roles were widespread and deeply ingrained in various societies, well before the 1900s.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

Your comments are not being deleted. They are in the "newest comment first" section

[@DanielCayo-uj3pg]

But they were right, all of them, and don’t forget about Arthur Schopenhaur. And the reason why women are like this is because that society is too soft on them, spoilt them and granted them too much privileges which I can list one by one, since the beginning of time. They need discipline, and they need it fast, and if there is a draft, draft them as well, they need it. Some of you might argue that their biology is not capable of it, but think, do they actually deserve this privilege?

[@Fandar]

Women are like what? You are just talking nonsense with nothing to back it up.

[@DanielCayo-uj3pg]

@@Fandar I do, since life is harder for men in basically every single way.

[@DanielCayo-uj3pg]

@@Fandar and sorry, facts don’t care about your feelings.

[@pollyandgus]

@@DanielCayo-uj3pg facts don't care about your feelings either baby

[@DanielCayo-uj3pg]

@@pollyandgus well then please describe your ‘facts’. I want to now what made you dismiss me.

[@llamad3381]

1:53 XD

[@georgetapia1010]

Unless there's a video about what Eastern, African or (Native) American philosophers thought, it seems that this is merely a European mindset.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

No it's not. Schoppenhauer derived his philosophy from buddhism. Many philosophies, religions, and cultural traditions have viewed women with skepticism or placed them in subordinate roles: Buddhism: Traditionally saw women as obstacles to spiritual enlightenment, needing rebirth as men to attain Buddhahood. Hinduism: Texts like Manusmriti often place women in a submissive role, seen as sources of temptation. Christianity: Frequently portrays women as subordinate, with Eve’s role in the Fall symbolizing temptation. Islam: Some interpretations view women as a source of fitna (temptation), with strict rules on their behavior and dress. Judaism: Traditional texts often limit women’s religious roles and depict them as secondary to men. Traditional African Cultures: In many African societies, while women held crucial roles in family and community life, they were often excluded from positions of political or spiritual power. Gender roles were strictly defined, and men typically held leadership roles. Native American Cultures: Views on women varied greatly among tribes. While some like the Iroquois had matrilineal systems and respected women's roles in decision-making, others restricted women's participation in leadership or spiritual practices, often seeing them as tied to domestic responsibilities.

[@geetanjalir2093]

​@@josef-gorosinhuf5003 Manusmriti is not a spiritual or religious book for the Hindus, it's a Law Code. The Vedas, namely, Rig Veda, Atharvaved, Samveda, anf Yajurved, are the principal religious texts. Other important ones are the Bhagavat Geeta, and the Puranas, The Ramayan and The Mahabharat may be referred forsymbolic, literary, poetic interpretation of the Vedic principles to be read in the light of the vedas.

[@Dennis-nc3vw]

Absolutely not. Read Confucius.

[@geetanjalir2093]

@@josef-gorosinhuf5003 why was my comment deleted? It's fishy

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@geetanjalir2093 It wasn't. Go to "newest comment first". YT doesn't like spicy topics.

[@tonynugget7223]

Even the buddha himself was right about women

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

Not only the buddha was cautios.

[@nnconfomiststoic888]

So he first had fun,, left his wife and sought solitude and Meditation

[@bimblealong]

Judging ancient history by today's morals!? Real Intellectual stuff here then....😂😂😂

[@محمدالعمري-ز9و]

Because men are rational and hence dislike the irrationality of women and of course especially philosophers are against women! I also like to philosophize and I always get on women's nerves.

[@clearlister]

anything gets on their nerves

[@Correction-zl2oe]

Uhh rationality is infinitely better than irrationality lets play a game tell me an important situation where irrationality is the superior path ill ive u .............the rest of your natural life you wont find one lol.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@Correction-zl2oe Logic is the most important factor, which seperates us from the animalistic part of nature. It's the thing that made as top of the food chain.

[@theunknown8735]

​@@josef-gorosinhuf5003based and aristotlepilled

[@Hgvcunk]

The hubris of believing oneself omniscient, compounded by the experience of rejection from women, may indeed culminate in such a fate. It is an undeniable truth that some among them were profoundly isolated individuals.

[@henry6525]

It was their choice if you understand that. Being isolated from women creates a wonderful space where creativity and philosophy thrives. Very few philosophers were married.

[@Hgvcunk]

@ All that I am certain of is that the Ancient Greek philosophers were afforded such a choice, though I harbor some reservations regarding whether the same could be said for Kant and Schopenhauer, to name a few. Moreover, during the Middle Ages, philosophy could only truly flourish in environments where individuals were bound by the vow of celibacy.

[@henry6525]

@@Hgvcunk Not just Middle Ages.

[@johnanderson6946]

and they were absolutely right go cry!

[@ChadNorwood-g1v]

the claims of these philosophers are also undeniably true. Just because its contempt that makes one state negative things doesnt mean those things arent true.

[@DarthZeromus]

There is nothing new under the sun. What has been will be again

[@matheusventurim-bg9sp]

Based.

[@artemisgruis1528]

So this biased nobody making the video pretends to know more and to be on higher and righteous moral ground compared to the conclusions of some of the greatest men to ever be alive. So he actually critiques without any knowledge or merit the conclusions of these great thinkers and philosophers? This is the case of magnanimous philosophers throughout the ages coming to the same consensus. So basically great men from different time periods, circumstances and nations all collaborated in some sort of way that transcended time and space to conspire to keep women down from positions of power???

[@RammingSpeed-lk8kk]

How is maki g an accurate observation one and the same as "hatred"?....I can observe that Sharks sometimes eat people, it doesnt mean I HATE sharks.

[@santythehamster]

I understand that women are imperfect men, but I still think it's strange because we are all women at conception as far as I know (aside from other things like genes), as if we were machines for women to have children .

[@Dennis-nc3vw]

We really are. Historical studies show we descended from twice as many women as men, meaning women just had to exist to pass on their genes, where as men had to impress women. So we've been genetically engineered over time to be women's servants. It's basically what The Catalyst described in Mass Effect 3. The created surpassing and rebelling against their creators.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

The real tragedy is that the "collective queen" holds intrinsic value. Men struggle, feeling the need to resist her pull to maintain their own sense of freedom.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@Dennis-nc3vw Beautifully said!

[@Correction-zl2oe]

Dont flatter women machine implies efficiency lol

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@Correction-zl2oe You got his message wrong. He called men the machines.

[@ThoughtfulManiac]

Philosophy and science share the same parents- critical thinking and scepticism. But what distinguishes philosophy from established science is that science deals with comparatively objective truth eg laws of nature, while philosophy deals with comparatively subjective truth- eg humanity and lifestyle. Any imbecile saying "if the smartest ever men in history said that then it must be objective truth" are dismissing the very spirit of philosophy. If you don't strive to have ideas and discoveries of your own then you still lack critical thinking. If you do not dare to challenge a belief then you still lack critical thinking. The more one knows, the more they're aware about how little their knowledge actually is.

[@Correction-zl2oe]

Woah buddy we have at least as much evidence for women being nuts as gravity existing lol after all 99% are crazy and if you are an astronaut then you have been affected by gravity 99% of the time lol

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

Philosophy serves as the bridge between religious belief and empirical data, filling in areas where science may not yet reach but still offering valuable insights. While it may not claim the objectivity of scientific laws, this doesn’t make it less meaningful or truthful. Instead, philosophy provides us with frameworks and principles that guide our understanding of purpose, ethics, and existence. Its role is complementary to science, adding depth to the human experience beyond empirical evidence. If it's supported by data, then it's considered the truth.

[@PeggyMorgan-n7b]

The Christian Bible tells us how to be a virtuous woman. ❤️🙏

[@nnconfomiststoic888]

Looks like you're one

[@IvanTibster]

@@PeggyMorgan-n7b There is only one way to do it: by submitting to your man.

[@Barnstormer1969]

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

[@jazzpianotactics]

you are beta

[@NapalmMan69]

Islam ☪️

[@Serene-ogee]

Amen I hate the west

[@salieri8903]

Bunch of incels in the comments

[@kinghermit]

Unfortunately... I hope they meet a good woman so that they'll understand that everything is not black or white.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

I'm not celibate, but nice try with the shaming tactic. A piece of advice: Don’t rely on the shaming tactic too often, or it will lose its impact and become ineffective. And of course, it only works on people who can't navigate around ad hominem attacks.

[@Quwucuqin]

When you think you know something you know nothing of it

[@santythehamster]

​@@josef-gorosinhuf5003How is that a shaming tactic? I've seen you respond to comments from people that you think are wrong, so I'd appreciate it if you could correct me. Thanks And for the main comment, I've seen worse comment sections haha, in which they say that giving rights to women was a mistake or things like that

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@santythehamster "Incel" can be used as a shaming tactic because it carries a strong social stigma and often reduces complex discussions to dismissive or derogatory labels. Initially describing individuals who identify as "involuntarily celibate," the term has since become associated with negative stereotypes, including anger, misogyny, and social isolation. As a result, calling someone an "incel" in debates, especially online, is often intended to discredit them by implying bitterness, failure in relationships, or antisocial views, regardless of whether they identify with the incel community. This tactic is commonly used to sideline or dismiss a person’s arguments on gender, relationships, or social issues by framing them as resentful or socially marginalized. The negative connotation can quickly shift the focus away from the discussion and onto perceived personal failings.

[@refraf8030]

I disagree with the idea that women were made to be helpers to men.

[@RickSanchez-rd5tn]

Genesis 2:8 “It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him".

[@Anamerican01]

​@@RickSanchez-rd5tncristianity 🤣🤣

[@refraf8030]

@@RickSanchez-rd5tnHonestly I’m starting to believe that men are bigger helpmates to women than women are to men.

[@Cortez0]

@@RickSanchez-rd5tnGood one

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

I believe that we are the biological slaves of women. Women have upgraded our species through men. They hold the key to physical intimacy, which men are so addicted to. The one who can overcome their biological restrictions and rise above these needs has truly conquered their determinism.

[@deathsquad8891]

My respect for the philosophers: ✨🌍🌎🌏🌑🚀🏙️📈

[@PakSuyono-c4f]

What the purpose of woman?🥸

[@keithyoung7065]

Why do you say they are harmful views? They are true possibly?

[@jonathonwallace4128]

It's true. We all start out as female but men keep evolving. It's not hard to understand