Stock Pvkv 4 in realistic battles has 2.7 degrees per second, same as the m10. So, he isn't *fully* incorrect by saying that the m10 has the slowest turret rotation speed, but he also isnt fully correct either. I didn't even know the Pvkv 4 existed though-
@crackerman55193 ай бұрын
its a good tank though
@otaviom64803 ай бұрын
The Archer has the slowest traverse rate in the game at 1.7 degrees per second without modifications. Meaning it would take it almost five minutes to do a full rotation if it had more than 40 degrees of traverse range
@spectreblitz93123 ай бұрын
@@IDKAnymoreAmIRealwar thunder adds vehicles that existed either in blueprint or manufacture. So yes, of course it existed. 😂😂
@JVBKing3 ай бұрын
@@otaviom6480 The wiki says it's actually 1.5° stock. Must be using some of that wrist action to power the boiling vessel 🤣
@IndianaNorthWestern3 ай бұрын
Going from the M10 GMC to the M36 GMC is like going from a bicycle to a car lol
@poptart23-lg2ro3 ай бұрын
m18 is the supercar
@R5W-CheeseburgerMan3 ай бұрын
I remember when it used to go M10 to M18, and the change in turret rotation speed was insane
@anonymous-cs8zt3 ай бұрын
but you lose the abiltity to eat a lot of shells at its br
@GewelReal3 ай бұрын
@@anonymous-cs8ztdoesn't matter when you're open-topped anyway also 90mm pocket nuke launcher is way too much fun
@kamalal-hamid46343 ай бұрын
@@anonymous-cs8ztfair, but every time I play it, if something sees me and I don’t shoot first, I die. Prolly a skill issue though lol
@CatGamer747-83 ай бұрын
I love how I see this as I am playing the M10 lol
@iwantmynametobeaslongaspos71943 ай бұрын
Were you scrolling while waiting for the turret to turn
@CatGamer747-83 ай бұрын
I wish lol
@TheMinman8083 ай бұрын
@@iwantmynametobeaslongaspos7194bruh that’s wild 💀 Some say he’s still waiting for his turret to turn around now
@ahuman05053 ай бұрын
Don't worry, all you have to do is follow three simple steps! 1. Unlock all the turret traverse modifications 2. Sell your soul to Gaijin in order to get a max level gunner for better targeting 3. Quit (warning, step 3 is impossible)
@mig2five3 ай бұрын
@@ahuman0505it's just the sad truth with gajin and his corporation......
@AviatorVyns3 ай бұрын
In situations where the tank turret is slow I just turn the whole vehicle
@kylekrewson28573 ай бұрын
Having your armor at an angle is a bonus
@AVerySexuallyDeviantOrange3 ай бұрын
@@kylekrewson2857even when angled, its got a whopping japan tier of frontal armor, the angle is not helping for anything besides maybe a .50
@SnatchUWU2 ай бұрын
There's a Soviet medium tank that's like that s*too slow AF I just turn the whole tank
@SerbijaSupreme2 ай бұрын
It was actually in the user manual, it stated that you should turn the entire Hull instead of rotating the turret and only use the turret as a fine aiming
@TheEDFLegacy2 ай бұрын
@@SerbijaSupreme That's exactly what I was thinking. It's more of a convenience than a useful feature; certainly better than a fixed-forward mount, but has almost the same drawbacks as one.
@f1fan8063 ай бұрын
It was also because the turret was heavy on the front which prevented it from traversing on a hill steeper than 4 degrees, to fight that they installed weight blocks on the back of the turret (this can be seen in war thunder)
@World_of_War_Thunder3 ай бұрын
Finally someone who tells the whole story
@derinfomann45813 ай бұрын
Also, they wanted the TDs to be as Cheap as possible, so they cut some corners for Cost
@steyn17753 ай бұрын
Oooh That's what these things are
@wartimestudios28983 ай бұрын
if i get shot down in my bi plane by one more of these fuggin things ima lose it
@TheGoober21003 ай бұрын
This is probably my best aaa vic
@Potatoies3 ай бұрын
50 cal my belioved
@stillcantbesilencedevennow2 ай бұрын
@@Potatoies f*ck yes, and so many American tanks have em. I bet that gun terrorized the axis.
@justyourachtungpanzer25273 ай бұрын
that explains why panthers were camouflaged as M10s
@eort44993 ай бұрын
Cries in Achilles
@MultipilotSimulation3 ай бұрын
I was thinking the same thing
@carsondimech1293 ай бұрын
Meanwhile it’s still Britain’s best tank until the firefly 😭
@twurtle12hd393 ай бұрын
@@carsondimech129ummmmmmmmm no?
@ukgamer28173 ай бұрын
@@carsondimech129it's close but the 75mm cromwell wins for me but that's just personal preference
@elduquecaradura14683 ай бұрын
@@ukgamer2817not good for frontal but decent in side shots, possible thanks to how fast and nimble is is not a personal favorite of mine, but trustable if I had just some luck. However I miss the explosive filler when I face some kinds of tanks like lightly armored or open top ones, I know there is HE, but shoot and switch ammo is a nuisance that can cost me the tank. 6-7/10 for me
@noahsawesomevids4223 ай бұрын
Once m10s gunner get aced than it’s pretty unexpectedly mediocre speed
@spectreblitz93123 ай бұрын
Expectedly* because to say unexpected means you didn’t know?
@LESSERSCMITT262A1U43 ай бұрын
5 degrees per second you mean?
@Michael-uc2pn3 ай бұрын
@@spectreblitz9312 I think he means the aced turn speed is actually decent when compared to the regular speed for the M10, but still utterly mediocre. Like you don't expect the crew skill to make that big of a difference.
@alexphenex83 ай бұрын
>WT >CoH2 music What a crossover!
@JanZizka-fk8im3 ай бұрын
I mod my king tiger to one shot m10😂😂
@spartan87053 ай бұрын
Royal Artillery treated their Achilles as self-propelled anti-tank guns, which with such a slow traverse is probably a better role for them
@MSUTri3 ай бұрын
Well yeah, it's a tank destroyer, not a tank. By design and doctrine they're best used for ambushes from prepared positions, using their superior speed and mobility (compared to most contemporary tanks) to deploy from reserve in advance of the flanks of attacking enemy armor columns. However, the M10 was heavy, slow, and by the late war under-gunned, so it wasn't really the best at fulfilling that role. It was a stopgap solution.
@beanssnaeb31543 ай бұрын
M10 my beloved you have carried me through everything
@Bobfish3033 ай бұрын
Same. It's my most played vehicle out of any in the game
@yaboianz3 ай бұрын
Early WW2 engineers in the US loved hand cranks apparently, both the M10's turret and the F4F Wildcat's landing gear are fully hand cranked
@CatNibbles3 ай бұрын
Hand cranked landing gear was not uncommon in a lot of planes. You have to think as an engine; either you can install a motorized landing gear with the extra weight of a small motor and battery, or you can not do that and have a cheaper to produce aircraft with a better power to weight ratio, or use that weight to add an extra few machine guns and ammo, or fuel. Which one of these would you rather have, one that only affects you for less than 1% of your flight time, and can break down much more easily, or the ones that can affect your strategic, tactical, or operational capabilities?
@TheSaturnV3 ай бұрын
I read somewhere that pilots could unlock the landing gear and put the plane into a hard bank and flop gear out...just don't get your hand near the crank 😣
@Lesocialist3 ай бұрын
And because no one could predict that in the future people will recreate the worst days of their lives just for fun.
@bennettvasconcellos483 ай бұрын
In
@brendenburke2723 ай бұрын
American M2 medium tank AKA the (walking) machine gun nest.
@TheJuggtron2 ай бұрын
Walking being the operative word
@arcroyal12583 ай бұрын
The Archer:
@brunex_247z83 ай бұрын
Now check Kv-2 rotation
@Spartan_2-13 ай бұрын
The German variant. 🙃
@DoshHet3 ай бұрын
Also MAUS:
@dancomando3 ай бұрын
Panther has hydraulic booster LinkedIn to current engine speed but later panthers had booster operating at max engine speed
@TheOreoOverlord3 ай бұрын
partially true but its mostly for the reason of america desperately needed a tank destroyer with a more punchy gun than it currently had. the M10 was designed as a stopgap measure based off the Sherman chassis. as such, more complex parts like the hydraulic turret drive were omitted to keep the machines simpler in the design process and also quicker easier to produce.
@shaunfilby80263 ай бұрын
The panthers turret traverse is slow for balance. Irl its 15-24 sec for full rotation depending on model
@soto16493 ай бұрын
we have a and g model in warthunder that can hit 20second turret rotation
@shaunfilby80263 ай бұрын
@@soto1649 the tank museum's panther is recorded at 18sec for full rotation. 15 seconds is without the rpm limiter on later models
@Demcalves3 ай бұрын
The D variant is historically the first variant produced for wartime use. They didn't initially connect the turret traverse to the engine like in later models, the D variant used a hand crank instead, probably for the same reasons the m10 was hand cranked. If you removed the speed governor like you mentioned and maxed out the engine to 3000 rpm the rotation was clocked at like 36 degrees as mentioned on its actual Wikipedia page. That rotation speed value is used for the panther a at least in arcade battles
@-ruttley34573 ай бұрын
The Panther with the slow turret is the Ausf. D, confusingly this is the first production variant, with the Ausf. A coming later. The Ds were the 1st 1000 or so vehicles produced from early 43 to late 43, their turret traverse was limited to 6° per second, iirc because faster rotation was causing electrical fires or faults, its not a game balance thing
@ElevatedAce_1093 ай бұрын
I always thought that slow turret horizontal traverse were for better accuracy, guess i was right
@jurgenh.79803 ай бұрын
Yes but also no. Pretty much every tank had a mechanical turret drive and backup. Final gun laying was pretty much always done by hand while powered traverse no matter which variant was only used for rough gun direction. Its more about the fact how it was implemented in the tank. Many tanks, also germans, had foot pedals for power traverse and cranks for hand traverse. Russians often had a "2in1" crank, giving it some limitations since you had to be at the right position to activate powered traverse. So yes. Slower traverse is needed for accuracy but not that slow and fast traverse is still needed and superior.
@ElevatedAce_1093 ай бұрын
@@jurgenh.7980 "The more you know"
@tritankista89763 ай бұрын
Pvkv IV: Pathetic.......
@Majorite3 ай бұрын
That thing's horizontal might as well be in the negatives!
@cylerherbst91433 ай бұрын
@@Majorite me, trying to aim left, watching as the gun aims right:
@AHSValor3 ай бұрын
For its BR, the M10 was the only American tank I feared as a German player
@Sgt.Fish.443 ай бұрын
The only thing I fear is the IS Series 😅
@ydk1k2533 ай бұрын
The M18 will become your new fear when you hit 6.0 BR
@AHSValor3 ай бұрын
@@ydk1k253 I thoroughly expect that one. And in a smaller package no less
@Alpha_6273 ай бұрын
@@ydk1k253 grown up m22?
@imperialguardsman57263 ай бұрын
They were the only thing that consistently killed me when i was in my KV series tanks
@wathog223 ай бұрын
I’m loving the COH2 music in background😁
@Eifelwolle3 ай бұрын
probably best RTS music. prove me wrong
@leon_yeet2 ай бұрын
@@Eifelwolle hold up, COH1 had the best
@rafaelleal53373 ай бұрын
I use it like a tutel. Just track rotation
@springfield1973 ай бұрын
Well not only that but tank destroyers weren’t meant to start driving towards enemy vehicles, they sat at a location and was able to fully traverse with the turret itself a larger range with easy movement. Not like war thunder where players drive and shoot. Lots of players don’t take that into consideration. It’s why we need bigger makes one war thunder, Much bigger maps in air and ground. As well as naval.
@HERMETICTELEVISION3 ай бұрын
it's not real life. we aint gonna sit for 10 hours in wait for the enemy to pass by bro
@springfield1973 ай бұрын
@@HERMETICTELEVISION then don’t join that game mode
@springfield1973 ай бұрын
@@HERMETICTELEVISION I much rather have games where there is more room on the battlefield. Not be in the other teams spawn in less then 30 seconds.
@heinersaller53743 ай бұрын
Nice said. You want realism? Try this
@rocketcello53543 ай бұрын
Join air sim, some planes that are literally useless in RB are great in sim. For example, the radar-equipped DO-217 fighter. Great for shooting down bomber formations. Or the B-25. Goes from a meh medium bomber into a rat that can take out a base and a half, or can easily destroy a convoy, cause it can fly low and fast, and the lack of gunner coverage on its belly doesn't matter, and you're harder to spot.
@BONE96463 ай бұрын
Pvkv IV has the slowest rotation in the game
@thermobarickitten10623 ай бұрын
i was absolutely horrified when i first used it
@luukasteivainen-ur6nm3 ай бұрын
Turret rotation jumpscare
@KayThunder3 ай бұрын
Even though the m10 has a bad turret traverse speed, it makes up for it in firepower. I used it ONCE in grb as a flanker, it killed a lot of kv1s and t34s
@SprayandPrayman223 ай бұрын
I was playing my M10 on the reworked Fields of Poland map with a single cap point in the main town. We spawned on the south side so I went straight to the hill south of the town to counter any flankers and caught a Puma like I expected. What I didn't expect was the enemy team to not just take the cap but roll over my entire team. I quickly went from flank guard to the front line in a matter of minutes as Panzer IVs, T-34s and KV-1s blitzkrieged their way out of the town. But I didn't back down and they weren't paying attention. I quickly began racking up kills before they even began to realize I was on their flank as they pushed to my spawn. By the time I finally died, I hadn't breached double-digit kills but I was close but more importantly, I shredded the enemy team as they pushed out of the town, giving my team the opportunity to push back into the town and take the cap. We won that match and I'm pretty sure I finished with 13-ish kills.
@KayThunder3 ай бұрын
@@SprayandPrayman22 nice job man
@Doge_on_a_Tank3 ай бұрын
i would rather it have no turret
@reubenpoort95543 ай бұрын
Within reason its gun was so heavy that a faster turret rotation would tip the tank on an angle this the implemented counterweights to help
@mif6803 ай бұрын
m10 destroyer in post scriptum
@Xeraghusta3 ай бұрын
The m10 was actually supposed to get the turret drive motor off of the Shermans, yet the US army decided that it was unnecessary and scrapped the idea.
@adin83253 ай бұрын
Cries in Achilles td
@spectreblitz93123 ай бұрын
It’s because it’s a long range sniper, and the turret traverse speed matches with leading a moving target at long distances. The turret was designed to be slow to help with smoother aiming
@Klimotine3 ай бұрын
Ehhh no, its shitty rotation speed was a byproduct of a heavy, handcranked turret with a huge counter weight on the back there is a reason the M36, a future evolution of the M10 had a much faster rotation speed, it wasnt on purpose it was just a byproduct of several little faults the M10 possessed that where fixed on the M36
@mitri53893 ай бұрын
@Klimotine yeah that's all tanks... all tanks need to have a balanced turret. War thunder is just a dumb game we're they decided to balance certain vehicles by doing stuff like this.
@clonescope24333 ай бұрын
@@Klimotinethe church was relatively unbalanced but all these are results of trade-offs that ordinance board and the tank destroyer board went for When developing the M10 it was seen as a stop Gap just like its predecessor the M3 GMC it was a compromise to get a more effective chassis with a gun in combat then leaving the tank destroyer forces handicapped.
@doughnut35083 ай бұрын
I was playing the T-80U(Russian one) and I didnt have parts and I had HEATFS. And some guy took out my ring so I was running around with a black turret ring with next to no turret rotation speed. And a M1A1 AIM died to me in CQC
@Ren231143 ай бұрын
American skill issue or russian Bias, the question is real
@doughnut35083 ай бұрын
@@Ren23114 no clue a T-80 with slower rotation speed than an M10 with level 1 crew with a red gunner apparently beats an abrams
@EnricoPucci523 ай бұрын
Fun fact: M10 was orginally created to destroy japanese tanks, so it didn't need fast turret rotation
@Nobody101153 ай бұрын
No? It had lackluster turret rotation speed because doctrine at the time was for TD’s to be used defensively. Also it’s main focus was mounting the 76mm gun to be more effective at hitting hard targets like tanks at longer ranges and more effectively than the 75. In fact they were incredibly unpopular in the pacific and were mostly used as infantry support due to a lack of enemy armor, as most Japanese tanks had thin armor and knocked out by Sherman or Stuarts
@thegrimgripper84163 ай бұрын
Bruh m10s was in europe, pacific was Sherman's and sturats and plus japenese tanks were light tanks and terrible a Stuart was better than almost of them and Sherman was over kill
@stvdagger80743 ай бұрын
@@thegrimgripper8416 The 819 TD battalion, equipped with M10s, saw action against Japanese in the Palau Islands
@lippytheoneguy89683 ай бұрын
Aced you can get it up to like 5°/sec
@amgaddy3 ай бұрын
umm Kv2
@somethin55973 ай бұрын
Kv2 is faster
@pappugaming90383 ай бұрын
Archilles has the same rotation speed
@wolfe67443 ай бұрын
That’s because the Achilles is an M10 with a 17 pounder
@pappugaming90383 ай бұрын
@@wolfe6744 it shouldn't even exist in the game, it's just Achilles but with a bad cannon
@spectreblitz93123 ай бұрын
I just use the whole tank, can’t be bothered with the turret
@cherrypoptart20013 ай бұрын
M10/Achilles were some of the very best low br vehicles imo, only thing that were a threaten were soviet tanks with their APHE shells and planes that strafed u and the occasional bullshit artillery. I can recall a few times where enemy shot me through me in my M10 and the shells went right through and exited or literally didnt damage anything
@gamerfan84453 ай бұрын
I have to disagree with you. Considering that M4 sherman is a better protection than the M10.
@SkunkdMonk3 ай бұрын
Why did the US Army design a tank with such a slow horizontal drive? They didn't. Not a tank.
@thegrimgripper84163 ай бұрын
Its a spg
@aircranekris3 ай бұрын
Simple answer, you shouldnt need to traverse the turret when your a td sitting in a tree line or a forest waiting for your enemy to march in front of you 😂 idk just a guess
@arthurwilliam21063 ай бұрын
yeah, that's correct, if the M10 is on a situation that it needs to rotate 40 degrees quickly, then it's definetly doing something wrong, or the logistics weren't doing their work
@gigachad62303 ай бұрын
cries in achilles
@St0ckh01m3 ай бұрын
Turn up the music, i can almost hear you
@haminabowl78763 ай бұрын
They're literally all hand cranked at that era...
@SirCabooseCCCP3 ай бұрын
They have powered turret rings though that assist with the traverse, thats why when your engine dies your traverse is slower because the engine isnt using its power on the turret drive
@ole9933 ай бұрын
No😂
@beansontoast59963 ай бұрын
Multiple tanks had electric turrets. The Sherman for example
@Laurenz3573 ай бұрын
@@beansontoast5996 m10 is a sherman aswell
@spamuraigranatabru11493 ай бұрын
@@Laurenz357 M10 was redesigned for the requirements of tank destroyer branch, the_chieftain has some good archive infomation about it all The only thing it shares in common with the M4A2 it was based on, is the engine, running gear and lower hull
@tywarden54263 ай бұрын
H8 hmc turret rotation🤣
@vivivi..3 ай бұрын
I know right, thats what i hate the most when i first play wt on us tech tree😂
@Diamond-vp9je3 ай бұрын
Doesn't matter when the gun kills tanks anyway. But I understand the concerns
@DPWLVr3 ай бұрын
Better than the 105 sherman
@STGMORRISON3 ай бұрын
No
@magyar_matriot3 ай бұрын
105 Sherman is better
@chernoblyat.1523 ай бұрын
Playing the first panther after playing the M10 feels like a literal blessing, even though it's just a few more degrees of rotation per second
@infinitevoid___3 ай бұрын
Still better than that one Swedish tank.
@nachobusiness193 ай бұрын
Should be around 4.5 degrees a second, because irl It took around 80 seconds to fully rotate. Or I’m wrong and did the math incorrectly…
@mr_ThreeEight_17763 ай бұрын
No you're pretty on the ball, the devs are just salty piss babies
@paulocarvalho13513 ай бұрын
U guys are clearly deaf since he said "without modifications" wich means with modifications it can get way faster than the stock variant
@mr_ThreeEight_17763 ай бұрын
@@paulocarvalho1351 no it really doesn't, it shouldn't even need mods since if the game were even a SHRED of realistic i wouldn't need a fucking ACE CREW to almost get the same speed i would in reality. Go watch the m10 training vids dum dum
@nachobusiness193 ай бұрын
@@paulocarvalho1351 When it was stock it was around 80 seconds.
@ethanspaziani10703 ай бұрын
In other words people should be happy the turret moves at all
@nukeboy76333 ай бұрын
Well just turn your tank then aim from there, it's a good sniper
@CountryboyCale3 ай бұрын
If you motor or transmission is out then what?
@datcap62893 ай бұрын
@@CountryboyCale correct me if im wrong but if your transmission goes out then it either broke down, which it most likely didn't, or it got shot, and iirc american tank destroyers had horrendous armor so you were basically dead if you got shot anyway.
@CountryboyCale3 ай бұрын
@@datcap6289 this is war thunder, you dont die from one shot or have “health” that can he depleted. You have to kill the whole crew or blow it up. If you shoot a track, it can go in circles. If the transmission, engine, or driver gets hit it cant move until its repaired. So, you cant turn the tank anymore and the turret is under its own power to move.
@CountryboyCale3 ай бұрын
@@datcap6289 and i am talking about if your transmission got shot in War Thunder
@datcap62893 ай бұрын
@@CountryboyCale oh i thought you were talking about IRL also yes you can die in one shot in war thunder you just need to hit the right area
@whetser3 ай бұрын
Makes me glad I chose the German tank tree.
@Chounubis3 ай бұрын
Wherabooo
@Eifelwolle3 ай бұрын
@@Chounubis What makes him a wehraboo? its not mentioned that he meatrides "superior german technology", unless that is a term for Germany mains
@lemomannmusicproductions40743 ай бұрын
"Crank that shit faster, Johny, or we're all gonna die!" M10 turret creaking faster
@draysoncrook48983 ай бұрын
Cries in M2
@THECobrabitch3 ай бұрын
Try the Chi-HA Short Gun.
@onyxdragon11793 ай бұрын
M10 wasn't supposed to get into sticky situations where it'd need to rotate the turret more than a couple of degrees. Of course, not that it didn't get into said situations (or be forced into them), but it was supposed to engage stuff from range, so slower traverse didn't matter there.
@boredgrizz60373 ай бұрын
“GET THAT FUCKING GUN ON LINE” *”IM FUCKING CRANKIN MY BEST SGT”*
@brendenibrahim22653 ай бұрын
Brother I treat the m10 like a casemate lmao I do not have time for that shit
@BoMBAstiCcCc3473 ай бұрын
This sound track was from CoH2??!??!?! I like it dude
@El.fish.the.chocolate2 ай бұрын
The gunner is that guy that you think it would be ease to beat in a iron arm match but hw then reveals the giant muscle arm that it is his arm.
@Orangethemartian2 ай бұрын
M10 is prob one of the best 3.0 tanks in the game (with all upgrades)
@BigPapaKaiser3 ай бұрын
Because this thing is not supposed to be engaged in knife fights, and you don't need superfast rotation to lay on target at long range. You actually want slow and precise
@ramal57082 ай бұрын
I like to play flanking sniper with the M10 but when a faster enemy comes in behind me or at the side, I would never have the time to traverse and attempt to kill the threat. You could play this as a frontal assault tank but friendly support at your flanks would be preferable
@MolecularDrift3 ай бұрын
The premium Porsche Tiger is also a very slow, manually cranked turret.
@Lillkraken2 ай бұрын
The BT-42 laughing in the background
@ParalyzedTank3 ай бұрын
*owns stock M10* *engine got shot and no power* *trying to turn the turret* 💀
@johnlanderglea61203 ай бұрын
Hearing the COH2 theme battle is just triggered my PTSD
@Theover40003 ай бұрын
Now I’m wishing that I had recorded the Armada Megatron that I had as a kid before its (factory) batteries completely died. That thing made a lot of funny noises as time went on;batteries only died in 2022.
@WhackingJam3 ай бұрын
It was purposely designed to be slow to help with concealment, saw that in documentary about war production
@biowaste1793 ай бұрын
the M10 was a designated tank destroyer, however it did not have the hand crank for simplicity, it had the hand crank because hydraulic driven turrets require the engine to be on to operate. keeping the engine off with the M10 covered in foliage made it nearly impossible to find. youd be dead before you found it
@user-nb8yt2il2r2 ай бұрын
I used to think this thing was ridiculously slow, then i hand cranked a bradley turret, and now i understand lmao
@anthony76973 ай бұрын
Because also the doctrine didn't require a fast turning turret. A lot of WT has removed how this was intended to function - basically, it's designed to be a sniper, where turret rotation isn't important. It's meant to ambush tanks from range, and then if need be run away - not directly engage.
@cyansphere33943 ай бұрын
M10A1:Am I a joke to you?
@yourfriend41043 ай бұрын
The m10 did add a battery to increase the rotation speed, but gajin never added it. Most likely will never have it. It's been way overdue.
@helbent42 ай бұрын
I imagine is was thought the M10 would be an ambush killer. It could choose it's position and when to strike.
@hansohasashi50933 ай бұрын
I just treat it like a fixed turret, and by itself, the tank is absolutely amazing
@cheetahman5153 ай бұрын
I used to use that tank because it has the most powerful round at that br, but it was absolutely painful
@Nicolas-zw5ex3 ай бұрын
Cries in Panzer IV
@Caroline_Grace-Gaspar.3 ай бұрын
The previous tank: *turns around* *Explosion* RIP CAMERA 💀😭😭😭😭😭
@ShieldGeneral3 ай бұрын
Spins the whole Chassis just to get a traverse
@Muck1233 ай бұрын
Help bro this god dam tank takes two years to look at a panzer than misses
@datnguyen210403 ай бұрын
GUNNER,CRANK THAT SOULJA BOI
@frank-ob7os3 ай бұрын
Please turn the music up, I can still hear you
@Mav72833 ай бұрын
Bro, someone critically damaged my turret rotation mechanism in the m10
@stephenstowe97113 ай бұрын
Also the m10 was actually pretty deadly in ww2, it has a lot of kills
@Souls_293 ай бұрын
Expect the Panther D still had the engine supporting the turning
@BASSHOLE87523 ай бұрын
Gotta keep those arm muscles in shape!
@borosdavidattila3 ай бұрын
So the whole point of the video, the "why" is answered by. "Because they needed it". Thank you very informative...
@slyllamademon26523 ай бұрын
This doesn’t matter when you know that you can use the hull traverse to speed up the turret traverse by turning the whole tank where it has to shoot.
@EpikBerm2 ай бұрын
the orchestra supporting the Soviets invading the streets of Berlin in Company of Heroes 2 in the background:
@Potatoespaceprogram3 ай бұрын
Have a look at the Sherman (105) next
@thelegoman11763 ай бұрын
still faster than m10
@marksheen48733 ай бұрын
Pretty sure they’d turn the whole tank for any major corrections versus the turret
@ZoltanKreko-ee6mo3 ай бұрын
Aaand, its biased and faster in wt
@tywarden54263 ай бұрын
You wanna talk bias talk about the tiger 2 lmao
@wallachia47973 ай бұрын
@@tywarden5426 american main detected he thinks german tanks are biased
@brokenfingerz34813 ай бұрын
@@wallachia4797 why? Im american main, but get used to eating any german animal tank, from the start of my playing WT(almost year ago) to these days with abrams gang in hangar. I find the bias idea funny, but soviets can be annoying sometimes(like a T-90A with almost the same weak spot in the middle between turret and armor as the first M1, sometime APFSDS get eaten by entire driver/turret rotation mechanism)
@wolfe67443 ай бұрын
@@wallachia4797german main spotted who thinks American tanks are biased
@wallachia47973 ай бұрын
@@wolfe6744 I never said American tanks are biased. Also, I main France.
@memsysr3 ай бұрын
"Cries is casemate"
@Monarch_E.3 ай бұрын
This song gave me ptsd back when i used to play lan parties after school man, i miss those days, hate OKWs tho