Why don't moral philosophers behave morally?

[@depthoffield4744]

"There is a difference between knowing the path & walking the path" - Morpheus

[@rakeenmurtaza6096]

Thats not the point she was making, her point was more like "they know too much about the path to the point where it overwhelms them to actually walk it"

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more when I just wanted to be right there with you... Vs Think more when I know it's my way of how I express myself before you openly

[@homelessengineer5498]

"Waste no more time arguing what a good man should be. Be one." - Marcus Aurelius

[@jpf338]

Well Marcus Aurelius is just a fountain of wisdom. Maybe not the man but "meditation" it is.

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more nothing to worry about stuffs I used to worry all the time... Vs Think more like I fully committed to the way I wanted to be

[@lugus9261]

Schopenhauer: hey, compassion is kind cool Also schopenhauer: *kicks woman down stairs*

[@lugus9261]

@Dude Sweet just slips out

[@vsssa1845]

and he is famously unpleasant and rude, even to his uber-fans like wagner

[@ellistomago3369]

To be fair, she totally had it coming.

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as Harold Dwight Lasswell (1902-1978) who give the Model of Communication in the shape of a question containing many more questions such as *Who says, What to, Whom in, What Channel with, What effect?* Vs Think more the hardest way as how Dwight's model of Communication can also be described as psycho-sociological model of Communication because it deals with the psychological and sociological aspect of communication.

[@measureofdoubt]

In response to some comments so far: A priori, I would expect that studying morality 24/7 would increase one's moral behavior at least somewhat. At the very least, because it is harder to ignore moral standards when you've been thinking about them constantly, than when they never pop onto your radar. So the "Telescoping" (or psychophysical numbing) explanation I suggested in the video was a theory for why we might see no *overall* effect of studying morality on moral behavior -- i.e., a decrease from the Telescoping effect might be counteracting the increase from, let's call it, the "attention" effect.

[@cavalrycome]

Julia Galef There are two ways that ethicists could in principle be more moral than a control group of other philosophers. One would be if they are more diligent when it comes to the kinds of ethical decisions that both groups make about eating meat, voting, and so on, which I take it were the kinds of things Eric Schwitzgebel has been examining. If the world becomes more permeated with ethical choices for someone who studies ethics though, then ethicists could also end up being more moral by bringing ethical considerations to bear on a broader range of issues. That is true even if they don't happen to behave more morally on the decisions that both groups make. As for the telescoping effect, I can see how making an effort to vote would end up being one of a much larger number of things an ethicist rather than a non-ethicist might think are worth doing, in which case ethicists might find themselves spreading their moral effort more thinly, but a good test of the telescoping theory might be to compare the rate of unethical behaviors as well as ethical behaviors. I don't expect a telescoping effect would apply to the amount that each group lies, cheats on partners, etc. because these aren't as subject to the feeling that one's contribution to the moral good is just a drop in the ocean, unless of course there are people who think "I may as well cheat because I have so many wives" or whatever the relevant analogue would be in that case.

[@jasonhunter4419]

+Julia Galef It's unethical to teach nothing but ethics. Action is always key. Better to take action and say move my elderly neighbors garbage can back into their garage instead of write this KZbin Comment, oh well. Theoretically you can take pride in hypocrisy! Depending on what you believe, there's technically no moral consequences. Just give in! Do some drugs, eat meat, have sex, punch a homeless person, ect.

[@grantbarnes3678]

Julia, veganism is easy and simple, and vegans typically say going vegan was one of the best decisions of their lives. If you are not vegan, please go vegan. Veganism is about nonviolence. First and foremost, it’s about nonviolence to other sentient beings. But it’s also about nonviolence to the earth and nonviolence to yourself. If animals matter morally, veganism is not an option - it is a necessity. Anything that claims to be an animal rights movement must make clear that veganism is a moral imperative. Embracing veganism as a moral imperative and advocating for veganism as a moral imperative are, along with caring for nonhuman refugees, the most important acts of activism that you can undertake. Learn more about veganism at www.HowDoIGoVegan.com.

[@Brian.001]

+Julia Galef - Hmmm. I've certainly noticed this phenomenon in my own academic life, but I suspect there is a simpler answer. Moral philosophy, in my opinion, doesn't get anywhere. After all the years of debate and analysis, philosophers still vehemently disagree over what makes an action 'morally good'. So while academics stand up for one position or another, they have no resounding proof that they have chosen the 'right' formula. It deteriorates into a meaningless game, and keeps them in a job. I've ended up where I started out, really; a subjectivist. What moral discourse is actually about is expressing the sort of world we prefer to be a part of, and what sort of person we are or want to be. We can say that certain acts disgust or offend us, but not that they are objectively 'wrong'. So my answer to your question boils down to this: What sort of world someone would prefer to be a part of depends on how they feel about basic standards, such as fairness, honesty, etc. The Egoists (or narcissists) among us will prefer a world in which they can cheat, and get preferential treatment.

[@linusverclyte4988]

Seeing that most people had a religious upbringing they were almost certainly told that certain actions were forbidden by god (murder, theft, lying...) yet this does not preclude alot of them from doing those things (even with the all knowing boogy man looming over them). I'm fairly sure the guards at Auschwitz knew deep down what they were doing was wrong but they had a stronger motive that allowed them to counteract that belief. Basically the main reason why human-beings don't act morally is because they have an ego that tells them to look out for them and disregard others in so far as they don't serve the primary goal. Animals without selves like ants do not display selfish behaviour and die for the group if necessary without any mental effort at all. As a human-being it's actually hard to do the right thing when you can benefit from doing the opposite or just doing nothing. Certainly when the stakes are high, e.g you see a wallet with a thousand bucks and no-one is around to see what you'll do: will you return it or not? If yes what if it contained 10.000 bucks or 100.000? You know you should return it because that's the right thing to do but having a lot of money which you didn't have to work for is also nice. This is only reinforced when, as in this case of moral philosophers, people don't expect you to exhibit moral behaviour or at least not more than the average person. When I have a little more time I'll look into the theory you suggested.

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as the two steps to end slide show Vs Think more the Hardest way as the three main categories of transition tab which include Subtle, exiting and dynamic content

[@depthoffield4744]

Sociologists that study philosophers? Do we have sociologists that study sociologists that study sociology of philosophy?

[@nimim.markomikkila1673]

+Quetzalcoatl™ I think it´s the next study on Pierre Bourdieu´s list:)

[@metametodo]

What about the philosophers that study the philosophy of studying the sociology of philosophy?

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as D is for *Detection* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as D is for *Deteriorated* again

[@tudornaconecinii3609]

When I, by the end of High School, started going to debating competitions, often pertaining to ethical questions, I wasn't doing it to "make the world a better place" in any capacity. I did it because it was interesting. I feel like this could be true for many moral philosophers. They are in the field not because they consider making the world a more ethical place to be of vital and immediate importance (which would necessitate their participation in bettering the worldstate), but because they see ethics as one of if not the most intriguing puzzle in existence. In other words, their number one priority is solving ethics, and actually making the world better is more of a secondary goal... or even a mere side effect.

[@salj.5459]

Probably the most accurate answer

[@aarond3657]

Debating ethics is what they like to do, it's competitive, gets them engaged and is interesting, as you said. Life is so much more than what any person finds interesting. An example would be, the ethical debate comes to an end and one of them is most likely going home to a marriage that will end in divorce (50%). In the bigger spectrum of life you deal with people and situations that you don't want to deal with and are also out of your control. Doing something that you love is in your control and adds to your energy. Dealing with all the little fires that are part of a toxic relationship or other area of life with it's own problems will exhaust your energy, it will deplete the executive functioning centers of the brain. In a debate, the speaker, like an athlete is ready to go, has a strategy and a mindset. In all the other areas of life you can't be that prepared so you're out of your comfort zone. The evil personalities of this world are in it for themselves and don't even care about truth or being moral unless it's a manipulation in front of other people, but that's not being moral that scheming for a good reputation because of all the awful they are really up to.

[@tudornaconecinii3609]

@@aarond3657 "The evil personalities of this world are in it for themselves and don't even care about truth or being moral" - This is true, but slightly underspecified. While evil, selfish people don't care about being moral, they do care about morality. Creating a stable thriving environment in which everyone is better off is just as valuable for them as it is for normal people, because they are part of "everyone" too. The classic example is that thieves would prefer to live in a society in which LESS theft was taking place, such that they could feel more security about the stuff they take remaining with them (as long as the measures taken to reduce theft didn't directly impede their personal ability to steal). A less obvious but more pragmatically relevant example is the big corporations who support policies increasing the minimum wage, because they have the excess profits necessary to sustain the increase while their smaller competitors choke. This basically amounts to two instrumentally nifty concepts: 1. that one needn't be virtuous to be coopted in the search and refinement of morality 2. that one needn't be virtuous to act virtuously, if it is convenient for them to do so.

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think 🚛💎 Vs Think Driver, Handyman, Coolie, Loaders, Loaded materials, Challan, Taxation Permit, Mechanics, Diesels, Garage, Spare parts, importers, driving license, registration, plates numbers, exporters etc

[@alienzenx]

I think the answer is simpler. It's the same reason very intelligent people make seemingly stupid decisions in their personal lives. Intellect and character are not the same thing. Being able to reason morality is just not the same thing as being able to practice it. For example if you have a temper, knowing anger makes people act irrationally is not going to stop you acting irrationally when angry.

[@M3Lucky]

alienzen What is "character"? Personality?

[@MrNewberryL]

alienzen I suppose that might explain why they are no more moral, but it wouldn't explain their being less moral, if that was the contention.

[@alienzenx]

M3Lucky Character is an aspect of personality I guess.

[@alienzenx]

MrNewberryL I'm not sure it was the contention. Maybe I wasn't paying attention. I don't think that's true though. It may be true that people who identify themselves as philosphers are less moral, but I think it's fairly obvious why that is.

[@polaropposite1614]

alienzen Not sure I agree -- there's a difference between (largely) uncontrollable outbursts of emotion, and cogitated moral/immoral behavior. Most practices require both intellectual and emotional input, and moral philosophy is just a way of adding intellectual weight to our actions (while mediating our emotional inclinations). So raising a divide between intellect and emotion doesn't solve much. There's definitely a difference between moral reasoning and moral practice. The question becomes, then, why are ethicists so interested in ethics? Is it because ethics are important to them, or because it's just an avenue for them to work their intellectual muscles? That's rather depressing, I think...

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more why I can't randomly delete the select downloaded photos... Vs Think more to rationalise how an easy part become the most difficult part when I started to lose interest to what I focused on

[@masonkyle6318]

It's just like Hume said. Reason alone does not motivate us to do anything. Knowing what is good is not enough to do good. We have to want what is good in order to behave accordingly.

[@Zoomo2697]

Hume's critique of causality is a failure to understand the principle of sufficient reason!

[@hughbarton5743]

Phillip: thank you kindly! No, seriously. I have read Hume ( plenty? too much? not enough? not sure ...) But you managed in your brief missive to relate the first worthwhile thought he ever expressed. P.S. any Humephiles out there: yea, I know, I sound like an ignoramus. But : good news: I am equally dismissive of much of philosophical thought..I am not singling out Mr. Hume.

[@l1mbo69]

It is, if you have the innate desire to do the 'right' thing, that being whatever conclusion you come to by reasoning. It is for me, at least

[@SylviusTheMad]

"A man can do as he wills, but he cannot will as he wills." - Artur Schopenauer

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as how the difference between information and news lies in their particularity and generality... Vs Think more the hardest way as a proverb that says on Entertainment *"All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.'* and the wisdom behind this proverb is that relaxation and entertainment in everyone's life as important as work

[@JeffNippard]

Great analysis. It reminds me of the nutrition and exercise community; where the most knowledgeable authorities tend to not be in the most fantastic of shape.

[@beaumontstuff]

I knew I liked you😂 the fact that I found you here makes me happy! Love your videos bro.

[@yaqo6577]

Unexpected crossover

[@baileys6346]

Whoa. Dude, so weird seeing your comment here all these years later. I appreciate what you do for the fitness community.

[@alexmelodic2640]

Definitely didn't expect this Jeff on here!

[@DevPatel-if2jj]

@@alexmelodic2640 hes down bad

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as how Sergei Eisenstein at 26, he made his first feature film "Strike" released in 1925 Vs Think more the Hardest as how his masterpiece, "The Battleship Potenkin in 1925 presents a dramatised version of the mutiny

[@denny401]

The last thing a cook wants to do when they get home is cook dinner.

[@sieberozendal1627]

denny401 Chefs on the other hand..

[@SaifMalik-uz1tn]

Lol mans got a point

[@sirajussalekinsami]

maybe not a good analogy

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as Q is for qualitatiVE VS Think more the hardest way as R is for relatiVE

[@MrChaluliss]

I have put more thought/energy into the question of "how do i be a good human/better human" than I've invested time or energy in anything else. Albeit I'm only 21 so my time is limited but i can say I've sunk more than 10000 hours with ease though there's no measuring it, its a daily behavior that's frequent and even ritual, coinciding with certain other regular behaviors of mine like showering and going to sleep. I agree 100% there is this telescoping effect, the more you consider the easier it is to disregard smaller things. What i find most interesting is if you go big enough you'll hit a point of nothing really matters yet it really does because its all there is anyway.. in other words, you can choose if any given action is or isn't significant, its utterly dependent on your perspective and standpoint in reality. What makes something valuable(significant) to someone is weather or not it falls in line with goals they have for themselves. Even if those goals have never been spoken of or succinctly thought. Now from here its important to understand that all of us fundamentally have the goal of feeling good. Its literally chemistry. At the point the matter that makes us up is out of balance it feels and is in almost all ways bad, ugly, and undesirable. These thoughts have led me to a point of seeking a lifestyle that propagates good. Thus caring about the small interactions that seem insignificant to the whole. There's a lot of tricks to making oneself care about the little worlds we all occupy but at the end of the day its simply work. You must put energy into the world to get energy out. It feels good to try. So for the most selfish of reasons i give a damn about the little things around me. I do it because if i don't MY little world is ugly. These ideas are honestly simple but i think the fact is that thinking only gets you so far. You must also act. So to bring this little rant back around to the initial question i would simply argue that behaving morally is an act of balance and continuous effort and the conditions "philosophers" tend to subject themselves to aren't the most beneficial to nurturing balanced lifestyles. Tbh the majority of the worlds society's "norms" aren't balanced, often out of date and out of touch with our emerging changing world. I could go on and on but id be surprised if anyone made it through all of this, ultimately I've said nothing new to anyone I'm sure haha.

[@salj.5459]

Great comment. I've thought things similar to you have outlined here, but I've never actually applied it or tried to motivate myself to do it through selfish reasons. Interesting

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as C is for *Clutch* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as C is for *Conveniently* again

[@linhtoan1851]

As a philosophy major, I think ethicists don't act as morally as they preach because of their ego. Of course this doesn't apply to all, but in general, people who are involved with more "intellectual" fields tend to have a bigger ego (in my experience), so they might put themselves above others. I've found this to be consistent with math, physics, and engineering majors as well. I.Q. is standalone from E.Q. - emotional quotient. Source: Am currently also a math major, and formerly a physics major.

[@manuelillanes1635]

So much pseudoscience for one comment

[@leonlx564]

@@manuelillanes1635 i dont think you k ke what pseudo-science is buddy. He literallt says "I think" demonstrating that he us offering his opinion, he is not claiming that he reached his conclusion theough sciene. He is admitting to the fact that he is just stating an anecdite. Dont be pretentious if you dont know what you are talking about.

[@salj.5459]

@Leonlx You made a good point, but holy fuck your typos make it hard to read

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as A is for *Angiosperms* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as A is for *Anatomy* again

[@UteChewb]

This explains Chidi from "The Good Place" so clearly.

[@bulwarkjm2]

I was thinking about the episode where they meet Doug Forcett.

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more to live life as blameless... Vs Think more though being ignored or avoided by many

[@JonSebastianF]

1:03 The background noise is a moral philosopher just checking if Julia's front door is locked... It was, so he left and tried again at 4:20...

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more to always recall those memories of somebody who inspired me what to do when I was in such a situation.. Vs Think more yet to fool not by evil suspicious mindset people

[@3vil3lvis]

Anyone that read "Intellectuals" by Paul Johnson might think that these philosophers were morally bankrupt.

[@dystopiaahoy]

I like Julia but her explanation here sounds like a rationalization.

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as A is for *Archimedes* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as A is for *Archeological* again

[@bonjourcoco]

Hey, as always this is super clever, i really love what you do and your way of thinking. Maybe a part of the problem is what a philosopher actually is. It might be a very different beast from someone who study and teach philosophy. Carefully watching a swimming pool all my life will not make me a good swimmer. Cheers Cedric

[@dystopiaahoy]

being a philosopher implies that you are somehow outside of what's going on, but also doesn't necessarily mean that you couldn't do it if you wanted to. In fact, doing so might give such a person deeper insight

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as O is for Operative Vs Think more the Hardest way as P is for Pave

[@kant12]

they know all the loopholes :P

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as how Sensitivity to various sounds and their minds is a must characteristics of a radio writer.. Vs Think more the Hardest way as how difficult and old words can also be used in the scripts of epics, ballad and ancient plays to depict that particular time period

[@andresvillarreal9271]

I believe there is a severe problem even in the name "moral philosopher". While moral philosophers are dedicated to the most bizarre scenarios, and to giving objective and absolute perspectives to morality, the rest of us just live and let live. And we are the ones who actually give meaning to "morality in action". If you actually want to study morality you do not start with "you have Hitler and Stalin and a gun with one bullet, who do you kill". You start with your dog, or any other sophisticated, gregarious animal and look how they instinctively have an approach to morality, or at least to the precursors to morality. You see how the basics of morality are evolutionary traits, driven by the fact that life in a pack is a lot more survivable than life alone, and that self sacrifice is necessary for the survival of the pack. Packs with too many egotistical tyrants tend to die off, and packs with self-sacrificing individuals tend to survive more, and have more offspring. On the other hand, when you read philosophers, you get the idea that morality started with philosophers, and only grows with more philosophers. You get diverted away from the fact that we have been a morality-oriented species for ever, maybe even before words existed. We know that we cared for apparently useless old and sick individuals because we have found bones of old people with wounds or sickness that would have killed any animal that was not cared for. We see how antelopes run in a formation where the weaker individuals are in the center, and the stronger adult males are in the outer ring, and frequently die. We see how the stronger wolf can easily kill any other member of the pack but doesn't. Morality is all around us, but moral philosophers apparently only see it in the most implausible scenarios.

[@worldofamina]

Andres Villarreal I really enjoyed reading your comment. Thank you.

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as 2. There is a public interest in freedom of expression itself Vs Think more the hardest way as how *whenever the public interest is invoked, the PPC will require Editors to demonstrate fully that they reasonably believed that Publication

[@nitro5401]

That's why everyone hates moral philosopher ❤

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as A is for *Appetite* again VS Think more the quickest intuitively yas A is for *Armor* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think fear not by dropping rains Vs Think more but to learn how to live life in hopelessly situations

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more as wise as how I repeatedly revealed myself before real you... Vs Think more as wise as how I repeatedly feels like I doubted others for fully trusting you

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest Intuitively way as C is for *Cacophonous* again Vs Think more the quickest Intuitively way as C is for *Calamity* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as U is for Unity Vs Think more the hardest way as V is for Verbally

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as D is for Determine, Discipline, Discredit, Discriminate, Discussion, Deteriorate, Decorative, Detective, Devine, Department etc Vs Think more the hardest way as 10 words that starts with D

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more as S is for Summer/Spring/Second/Schedule etc Vs Think more as T is for Timetable/Thursday/Tuesday

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as C is for *Chant* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as C is for *Chalk* again

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as H is for *Harmony* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as H is for *Happiness* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more to live not as predictable life Vs Think more to live not as guessing life

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more as S is for Sobering Vs Think more as T is for Tears

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more as difficult to burn or fire the wetted chimney firewoods when we forgot to cover the firewood stock during rainy time... Vs Think more as stitched watering ceiling dropped from rusting roof tin hole

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as O is for Operable Vs Think more the hardest way as P is for Pelvic

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as how commands are either functions or Keywords... Vs Think more the hardest way as how Keywords are the basic building block of the language, while functions are written in terms of simple programs

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as C is for *Chalk* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as C is for *Classroom* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as how we can insert any type of picture into the web page, in order to increase its visual appeal... Vs Think more the hardest way with why most of the browsers support only Graphic Interchange Format(GIF), Bitmap files(BMP), the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) files

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as how North America premiered its first interactive film called *Late Fragment* at the 2007 Toronto International Film Festival. Vs Think more the Hardest way as how the 170-minute long film had three separate but interwoven plotlines about three people whose lives are affected by crime and tragedy

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more to fool not by those who actedly tried to teach me lesson as if I was on my own way, which is against their will... Vs Think more as wise as possible to fool not by those who die-hardly tried to fake my particular point to win an argument which I believed in self

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as Q is for Questioner Vs Think more the hardest way as R is for Raiser

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as F is for *Framework* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as F is for *Full Stack* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more as wise as A for Article Vs Think more as wise as B is for Brochure

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as how *Short story was once a common publishing staple from the 1840s to the 1960s* and how during this time *one of the most popular mainstream genre was Crime* Vs Think more the hardest way as how *Crime Fiction is the genre of fiction that deals with crimes, their detection, criminals and their motives*

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as B is for *Beware* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as B is for *Before* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as how I shouldn't be fool by means of how shortcutters elaborated about success Vs Think more just as wise as how I enjoyed recapturing those repeated failure moments that help me to trust my own nurtured pattern instincts

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as K is for Knock again Vs Think more the Hardest way as L is for Live again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the quickest Intuitively way as Q is for *Quadratic equation* again Vs Think more the quickest Intuitively way as R is for *Rhombus* again

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as A is for *Alert* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as B is for *Bargain* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as A is for Sulphuric Acid again Vs Think more the hardest way as T is for Tungsten again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the quickest Intuitively way as one checklist is *To help us reflect on ourself as a Communicator* as another checklist is *To guide our thinking on practical ways of improving communication skills* Vs Think more the quickest Intuitively way as another checklist is *To help us work on improving standards of Communication*

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest as wise as how I managed how not to keep in touch my way of progressing the "thinking" businesses with others... Vs Think more as wise as how I speak up what my mind has to say, instead of what I should keep my mouth shut

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as wise as possible as A is for Antenna Vs Think more the hardest way as B is for Bean

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as wise as Margin-width attribute of Frame tag where it specifies the space to be left between the frame's contents at its left and right margins... Vs Think more the hardest way as No Resize attribute of Frametag where it specifies that a frame is not reizesble.

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as Q is for *Quilt* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as Q is for *Quests* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more as father.. Vs Think more to rationalise one single imaginary pleasure, is like I loose one child in reality

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way how not to be fool by liars Vs Think more the hardest way when honesty is the only foundation of progression, succession

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more to know who directed my paths... Vs Think more as narrow path seeker

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as MEDIAEVAL PERIOD in History, the hardest way as MAIL MERGE in Computer Science, as MICRO-ORGANISMS in Biology, as MATRICES in Mathematics etc Vs Think more the hardest way as NEWS PAPER ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE in Fundamental of Reporting, as NATIONAL HEALTH INTEGRATION in Health Education, as NOUN in English Grammar etc

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more as T is for Transfer Certificate Vs Think more as U is for Unique Identification cards

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as how *The term "Fourth Estate" was first used by Edmund Burke, who used it in a parliamentary debate in 1787 on the opening up if Press Reporting of the house of Commons of the United Kingdom* Vs Think more the hardest way as how *The term "Fourth Estate" is now given to the Press(as per a decade ago), the earliest use in this sense having been described by Thomas Carlyle in his book "On Heroes and Hero Worship"*

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as how *Personification* is defined as Angry letters that are assigned to human emotions Vs Think more the hardest way as *Simile* which is a comparison figure of speech

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as *Encoding* a factor which is the formulation of message bby the receiver.. Vs Think more the hardest way as *Decoding* a factor which is the interpretation of the message by the receiver

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as Y is for *Youth* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as Y is for *Yield* again

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as S is for *Spider* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as S is for *Spinal cord* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Quickest Intuitively way as E is for *Endoscopy* again Vs Think more the Quickest Intuitively way as F is for Follicles again

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as S is for *Subordinate* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as S is for *Screw-up* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as how an Inspector who was in-charge of food security measure respond to contacts mostly with no saving contact numbers that comes from complainers of different localities in the areas where he/she was in-charged... Vs Think more the Hardest way as how a Judge in the court find out the list of many missed call numbers as he was keeping his/her smartphone in silence mood at the time of jury

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more it's the only way to be kind with others always Vs Think more it's the only way to let people treated me with kindness in return unexpectedly

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way since the last comment, 1440 seconds ago... Vs Think more the hardest as how I should always mind on my own way of being myself infront of everyone

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more as W is for Wifi symbol sign Vs Think more as X is for X-factor TV Reality shows sign

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Quickest Intuitively way as C is for *Caleb* again Vs Think more the Quickest Intuitively way as D is for *David* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more as O is for Optimistic Vs Think more as P is for Pessimistic

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as wise as how I know how much I feel bad when I happened to come across that I have to outsmart anyone based on the challenge situation that I managed to handle... VS Think more the quickest intuitively way deep as wise as how I know that sometimes we become disrespecting to each other no matter in between friends, siblings relatives, neighbours when a tendency of competitiveness aroused between each one of us, as this could result into less supportive to one another, tired of taking care to each other, hidden jealousness, a feel of unimportant when anybody is better than others etc

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as O is for Open Vs Think more the Hardest way as P is for Pen

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest intuitively way as C is for *Charisma* again Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way as C is for *Colloidal* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as *•Across the board:* which defines as Embracing all classes or categories without exception Vs Think more the Hardest way as *•An Action man:* which simply means a dynamic, macho type of man

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more as M is for Megapixels Vs Think more the hardest way as N is for Night Pgotograph

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as how the first 'moving pictures' were more similar to documentaries than to feature film Vs Think more the hardest way as how Early films were dominated by novelty of showing an event.

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as U is for Unable Vs Think more the Hardest way as V is for Variable

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as /=(It is DIVIDE AND assignment operator. It divides left operand by right and assigns the result to left operand. Vs Think more the hardest way as %= (It is the MODULUS AND assignment operator. It gives the reminder (modulus) of the division

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the hardest way as C is for Cap Vs Think more the hardest way as D is for Dump

[@JimnesstarLyngdohNonglait]

Think more the quickest Intuitively way as T is for *Tractability* again VS Think more the quickest Intuitively way as T is for *Trainability* again

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Hardest way as Establishing Shot Vs Think more the hardest way as Extreme Close-up

[@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468]

Think more the Quickest Intuitively way as C is for *Commitment* Vs Think more the Quickest Intuitively way as D is for *Discipline* again