Why Gamers are Switching to High DPI

[@SimonT54]

My grandson said he is “cracked” after I show him this video. I think that is good. Newly subscriber!!! Thank you!!!

[@torontovlr]

lol, nice to hear that. I guess I'll try it out too

[@Arrradiance]

lmao

[@yosh1111]

why is this so wholesome lmao

[@uz5979]

you’re a cool grandad.

[@mistadude]

Simon T you are cracked

[@MatthewMora]

The amount effort put into this video is crazy. The combination of relevant PC/gaming information and god tier cinematography is unmatched! 👏👏

[@jolness1]

I’m guessing you recently found the channel? All the videos are mega well done, have fun watching the back catalog!

[@jolness1]

@Tube You what does that have to do with anything though? "I can't afford this so it sucks" is your argument?

[@rizqonfadillah4084]

@Tube You lol its just u not us

[@linjix]

@Tube You so u suggest we go and buy china ripoffs then

[@1dylancs]

@Tube You If you’re playing a game competitively / at a high level, it’s a massive help to have the best peripherals and hardware available. It definitely feels expensive but it’s worth it if you care about playing to the best of your ability, which many people do. Going from a top-end mouse to a lower-end mouse, you can definitely feel a difference in some aspects, even if you don’t play video games. There’s a reason that the professional players choose to use certain mice over others.

[@DeSinc]

not sure if it's been mentioned here but some sensors interpolate between samples for their higher DPI giving you a more noisy output that isn't as accurate and drifts (not that much but it's still something) with some sensors actually getting interpolation turned on at as little as anything above 1600 dpi. basically it pays to check your specific sensor and see what its max dpi is before it starts running interpolation and use that. or alternatively, pick what feels best in windows at medium sensitivity (6/11 setting in windows) and call it a day (never change windows sens value, if nothing's changed since the early days then changing that setting introduces even more artifacts that you don't want to deal with). also some mice run better at 500hz and struggle to run 1000hz and give you inconsistent reporting. you can download a mouse polling rate checker and move your mouse around quickly and see if you get 990-1000hz reporting or if it bounces between 638hz 782hz 598hz 802hz 712hz etc. for really consistently fast movement - probably just stick to 500hz if you see that. (if you move your mouse really slowly it can do that too though just be aware) and not to mention some CPUs actually can get slowed down a bit with 1000hz polling during an intensive game. my old CPU used to actually have noticeable skips in gameplay at 1000hz polling rate, just be aware of that

[@Bombipog]

half life man

[@mellified6500]

Do you have any sources for that windows sensitivity bit? WPS shouldn't be affecting your in-game sense at all and I don't see how it would be adding any artifacts when it shouldn't be affecting any games at all, but I'd love to know if it does since I do run lowered sensitivity in WPS.

[@DeSinc]

@@mellified6500 it's to do with skipping pixels. anything that is not 6/11 on the slider is dividing your inputs and missing pixel movements periodically to get the desired movement speed of the cursor on-screen. 6/11 (middle default sensitivity value) is the only one that is 1:1 and does not alter the ratio and doesn't pixel skip. going above this is worse than going below, but both are still not optimal. a setting of 8/11 can result in two pixels being entirely skipped over from time to time. a setting below 6/11 will simply result in inputs being periodically dropped entirely to emulate the lower sensitivity by not moving the mouse as far.

[@DeSinc]

@@mellified6500 further to that I've also heard that because of how the interpolation and dropping of inputs is done at settings other than the middle 1:1 scale you get at 6/11, settings above 6/11 have a minor acceleration effect and below actually have a negative acceleration effect. that is to say the faster you move the mouse at settings below 6/11, the more it undershoots, and the faster you move above 6/11 the more it overshoots, all due to how it divides numbers up in figuring out how much to divide or multiply your input by.

[@DeSinc]

@@mellified6500 sorry for annoying follow up but I just realised, if you use raw input (ACTUAL raw input) then windows sens won't affect it, you're correct. the problem is most games never used to use raw input and I'm pretty sure still don't to this day, and even some games that SAY they use it ACTUALLY don't and are still using dxinput which is altered by windows sens. just had to mention that because I just remembered it

[@romaDa]

This is next level tech reviews... builds his own machines, writes his own code, and all that delivered in such a good way without any obnoxious screaming and weird facial expressions

[@Nestho_Des]

Who are you referring to

[@JTMGJTMG]

@@Nestho_Des right, who have you in Mind romaDa

[@callisto1560]

and hes good at games!?!? and hes good LOOKING!?!? what is this sorcery

[@ahmedabdul1]

@@JTMGJTMG lmaoo

[@Velakor9150]

@@Nestho_DesLinus Fake Tips??? 🤔🤔

[@JaredBusch]

I have to say; I've watched several videos on the same topic, but this is BY FAR the first one that was digestible. a.k.a. NOW I understand.

[@peeuw]

what im baffled about is how he's using Nvidia's LDAT software, but if you look up the question "Does a higher DPI give you lower latency" nvidia says it doesn't.

[@randomname2914]

how can you not understand or have known this before any videos? Do you lack brain cells?

[@peeuw]

@@randomname2914 well no since a higher DPI actually doesn't give you lower latency. it's all bullshit

[@peeuw]

@@Abadeez yes, i remember 3kliksphilips video debunking this.

[@pino_de_vogel]

@@peeuw it does give you lower latency... i records data more frequently thats all you should need to know, there is no measurement required. even at a fixed 100 hz polling rate 2000 dpi still haves Never data each of the 100 clock cycles its just common sense. calling facts bullshit is a hype these days but that doesnt make it so.

[@MaybeBillClinton]

Man this is some serious research. Super impressed with the extent they you've gone for this. Awesome!

[@AT_Penguinizerrr]

Fr he just casually built a belt drivin mouse tester. Hes winning at life

[@nasser_almashjary]

Dude! You're being very modest. It's not a pasta salad that you whipped up over there but an awesome measurement device. RESPECT!

[@devotedtospeed]

i know right????? he simply said "okay so i made this" as if it was nothing

[@svanesk]

😂 solid reference, the pasta salad that is lol

[@Phiz787]

Imo his delivery is perfect. Hard work speaks for itself. He doesn't need to say a thing more!

[@therick8417]

not many creators i'll stop what i'm doing to watch, but yours is definitely one of them

[@ilovetinatanilovehersomuch]

@@floki1664 u act as if a 9-5 job is the only way to survive plus you dont take into account his personal life,

[@PoKeKidMPK1]

@@floki1664 his own comment entails he has something like a 9-5 therefore he chooses whats more significant for himself... lol how ironic. your own comment also entails projecting you dont have one.

[@EposVox]

This is absolutely wild data. Thanks!

[@DukeSloth]

Absolutely love the tests in this series, looking forward to the next one! Now to find a wireless mouse with a shape I actually like...

[@starertree7736]

@J M if you like the zowie shape then the steel series prime wireless is a good mouse

[@TeamClutch21]

@J M oh really you didn’t like the model o? I was thinking about getting it.

[@MasalMann]

@@TeamClutch21 I like mine tho its pretty gud in my opinion ig it depends from person to person. Logitech G Pro X wireless or whatever it is, is a little bit lighter than Model O and "Better" but its like double the price so pick ur fighter. I would suggest Model O Wireless for it being cheap and pretty good. Oh and also G Pro got like bigger Skates LUL

[@unkown215]

@@TeamClutch21 I fucking love it. Best mouse NA. it’s preference honestly.

[@vitorf2303]

Orochi V2 is really good

[@KennethRusli]

Really impressed with how you built together the test rig. It reminds me of the many creative ideas the 3D printing community comes up with.

[@punX86]

You could also test acceleration of the sensor :) fast move right, slow move back left and the cursor should be at the same startingpoint.

[@affect3124]

its best to turn off mouse acceleration in settings

[@masonv9333]

software side im pretty sure

[@h1Lu]

​@@masonv9333they meant the actual SENSOR acceleration (G rating)

[@yun8714]

The level of analysis, depth and just sheer engineering here is god tier

[@Sam-dk2dp]

Damn you're rhyming buddy haha

[@RetroPlus]

Yeah, it's amazing

[@GRID78_8]

Yup amazin

[@randomname2914]

lmfao

[@flowerface9011]

The thing about turning down in game sensitivity and increasing it on the mouse, as well as DPI, was something I totally found out by accident. Thanks for explaining all of this in a way that's easy to understand and for an overall fascinating video

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

Just so you know, the latency "statistics" in this video for different DPI settings are flawed: this guy doesn't understand how DPI is properly used, so his "statistics" are worthless. If you properly pair your ingame sens with a DPI that is between 400 - 1600, you will be golden. If you don't understand, or have questions, ask me. Low DPI will only cause "low latency" or pixel skipping, as it should be called, if you have a high ingame sens. Low sens players do not have this issue. TLDR: DPI is your physical sensitivity button. If you have it low (i.e. 400), you better be using your arm, and if you have it high (1600+), you better turn down your ingame sens.

[@ellibre5831]

@@zephyr_cg_Legacy you need to get your comment pinned, because what you just said is what I have been taught by pros and friends for years.

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

@@ellibre5831 I've posted this information around a little bit, and even posted my own comment, but I doubt I'll get the video maker's attention. It's unfortunate that people are tricked by these "facts", but hey, that just makes it easier for people like us to make it out of the average ranks eh? :)

[@ellibre5831]

@@zephyr_cg_Legacy oh without a doubt my friend \m/. I almost want to call them plebs, but Im not that mean :(

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

@@ellibre5831 yeah me neither, unless they are too arrogant to listen. I've had a few people reply rudely and refer to the "latency" tests as proof that I'm "wrong" lol... Oh well, at least most people listen.

[@BrochMan6]

Awesome video, it's really good to know dpi effects latency that much. I'd like to see you test more mice on this, and kinda come up with a top ten low latency wireless mice or something like that.

[@abyss_mk]

This is top tier content. So many unscientific videos exist on mouse DPI where someone is dragging a mouse by hand. I would love to see the raw data in some kind of spreadsheet format but otherwise nice work!

[@termitreter6545]

Just because someone uses their hand to drag the mouse doesnt mean the test is unscientific.

[@miweneia]

@@termitreter6545 any type of testing that includes human error is unscientific

[@Vysair]

@@termitreter6545 It's because it's not a controlled environment and has too many variables

[@termitreter6545]

@@Vysair It does lower the accuracy to do it by hand. But even the test in the video has flaws. Someone else in the comments mentioned it: Does the motors performance really stay the same over the stretch of the test? Like, does it get warm and response times change, does the lubrication cause artifacts, etc. You can endlessly strive for accuracy; but in the end, the question is if this is accurate enough for the information we want out of the video. That said, I am still happy that the video-makers took the time to actually set up a test rig for more accurate testing and higher reliability. Movement-delay tests are generally trickier than click-delay test.

[@termitreter6545]

@@miweneia I dont think there is a type of testing that doesnt have the potential for human error. Like, what if the rig was set up incorrectly, a mouse not correctly fastened, or the motors performance changed over the course of the test for whatever reason? Im not saying this isnt clearly better than the usual test, more that theres a scale of reliability, there is no exact point where "scientific" starts or ends.

[@t1995roger10]

Seriously everytime I watch his channel, I get more and more impressed by his cinematography, his PC building and his engineering skills Ali, you rock!!

[@REMY.C.]

Handsome and big biceps 😂 This guy is the nerd we all dream of being. I have posters of him all over my room 😂

[@MrBaracu]

@@REMY.C. Really?...

[@REMY.C.]

@@MrBaracu you'll never know the truth 😂

[@Almighty_Flat_Earth]

4:18 what's the name of that game?

[@MrBaracu]

@@Almighty_Flat_Earth apex legends

[@CoolJosh3k]

Would have been really neat to see the most popular mice tested. Also with the DPI tested up to much higher amounts. Perhaps a part 2?

[@koop3468]

it would probably be miniscule, or if they make another video just add another instance with much higher dpi compared to the rest of the sequence (e.g. 800, 1600, 3200, 12000)

[@blitZeero]

@@koop3468 Very high DPIs are usually artificial, meaning that the DPI increase usually stops at a certain point and instead just mutiply the value to get to that DPI, which introduces a level of error. Also, a lot of the info in the video is bogus either way, theres comments that explain why on this video

[@fivenightsatfreddursts2325]

I think the dpi increase was limited to 3200 because, as he said, you get very diminished returns in terms of latency decreases at that point. So he’s not testing it because the benefit is negligible at that point.

[@lachlanB323]

@@fivenightsatfreddursts2325 Cool. Don't care. Show us! That is like saying overclocking a rtx 4090 barely improves performance therefore nobody cares... I do! i want to see the most powerful hardware pushed to its limits

[@fivenightsatfreddursts2325]

@@lachlanB323 are you ok? It’s not really like saying that because it’s a mouse and it’s DPI. Do you raise your sensitivity in a game and then say “I’m pushing this shit to its LIMIT”?

[@franzjosefstakes]

The effort OT put into this video is insane. And bonus points for including standard deviation! :D

[@OrcCorp]

Impressive! 5/5 cookies for your amazing work 🍪🍪🍪🍪🍪

[@ReignSovereign]

the b roll shot at 1:21 of the mouse and the test machine you built is s-tier. just had to show some appreciation for that. GG

[@antoneverbright]

Keep these tests coming, the average customer (even though technically he wouldn't care too much) has a right to know about these things. Sensor latency and click latency tests have been somewhat neglected and I'm happy you're one of the few people that is putting it out there.

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

The latency "statistics" in this video for different DPI settings are flawed: this guy doesn't understand how DPI is properly used, so his "statistics" are worthless. If you properly pair your ingame sens with a DPI that is between 400 - 1600, you will be golden. If you don't understand, or have questions, ask me. Low DPI will only cause "low latency" or pixel skipping, as it should be called, if you have a high ingame sens. Low sens players do not have this issue. TLDR: DPI is your physical sensitivity button. If you have it low (i.e. 400), you better be using your arm, and if you have it high (1600+), you better turn down your ingame sens.

[@isse6790]

@@zephyr_cg_Legacy He isn't even measuring pixel-skipping. He's measuring the physical amount of time it takes for the computer to recognize a mouse movement, pixel-skipping is the game engine using the sensitivity multiplicator to make your smallest viewangle change larger than what the World2Screen function determines a function which has literally nothing to do with latency. You're the one that doesn't understand jack shit.

[@Doflaminguard]

@@zephyr_cg_Legacy thats what he said in the video. He even said if you want High DPI then lower you sense in 1:1 ratio increase of DPI.

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

@@Doflaminguard yes but I am focused on explaining that the latency is not an issue

[@U220E]

Thank you for such a good contribution to the mouse community! Although I saw no one wondering, I wonder if the mousepad’s micro-texture plays a role when it comes to accuracy at higher CPI. If I understood it correctly, higher CPI means that there’s less distance between each counts on the surface(mousepad). While Mouse sensor’s development is clearly going on, I wonder if mousepad’s surface are truly able to support high CPIs. If they're not, I think that explains why there are some people who believe that they feel better and more accurate/consistent at 800 CPI than 1600 CPI. Well it’s fair to point out that it might be because that’s what they got used to, but I think looking into relationship between mousepad’s micro-texture and higher CPI is an interesting topic. ...or I’m just a stupid monke. Thank you for reading.

[@notblazedfordays9536]

Uhh DPI….?

[@turbocomfy]

@@notblazedfordays9536 dpi and cpi are same in that context

[@notblazedfordays9536]

@@turbocomfy good to know. Never heard of it as cpi

[@ImportedPatriot91]

STOP SAYING CPI!!! JUST SAY DPI!!!!

[@Parkourcrazed]

@@ImportedPatriot91 CPI is a more accurate measurement as it translates to "Counts Per Inch" Whereas DPI translates to "Dots Per Inch" which is not nearly as self explanatory. Dots per inch refers to pixels as "dots" and Counts per inch refers to each pixel as a count. Which at least in my head makes way more sense when doing calculations.

[@olivercox2565]

I REALLY want to the see the next set of tests. Mouse acceleration etc. I don’t see anyone else using something well designed like this. Very cool. And thank god for putting some rest to “wireless will never compete with wired”

[@obeliskt1024]

Ali is on a breakthrough here. This will take him on the top of the chain when it comes to reliable subjective AND objective takes on mouse. It's great to see how much this channel and Ali has improved over the years.

[@outofahat9363]

Just discovered this channel. I love how in depth he goes with these technical comparisons. They put my "comparison ocd" to rest

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

The latency "statistics" in this video for different DPI settings are flawed: this guy doesn't understand how DPI is properly used, so his "statistics" are worthless. If you properly pair your ingame sens with a DPI that is between 400 - 1600, you will be golden. If you don't understand, or have questions, ask me. Low DPI will only cause "low latency" or pixel skipping, as it should be called, if you have a high ingame sens. Low sens players do not have this issue. TLDR: DPI is your physical sensitivity button. If you have it low (i.e. 400), you better be using your arm, and if you have it high (1600+), you better turn down your ingame sens.

[@megaboy2811]

@@zephyr_cg_Legacy You're wrong, you are the one who doesn't seem to understand how DPI works. DPI is basically the resolution of the mouse so the lower the DPI, the lower the resolution. Thus a lower DPI is going to have higher latency as it takes more movement for the mouse to be able to detect it. Well, "technically" speaking you could argue that it isn't really latency, but practically speaking the difference it makes is like increased latency which is the reason why he measured it as such. This is exactly the reason why he made the measurements at 4:34 in the first place. Besides calling his measurements "worthless" and copypasting it all over the comment section is not only highly disrespectful to the effort that went into those measurements, it's not even a valid point...

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

@@megaboy2811 so you at least understand somewhat. My only point is that if you use a DPI that properly compliments your preferred sensitivity or aiming method, the "latency" is not even a consideration. People with low sensitivity will make up for the longer gaps and even use it to their advantage by swinging their arm. You get insane precision and you make flicky accurate aim a habit. I should know, I use 400 DPI. I'm not wrong. Technically neither is he. But he's the one spreading misinformation; I'm just clearing it up.

[@megaboy2811]

@@zephyr_cg_Legacy ​ "I'm not wrong. Technically neither is he. But he's the one spreading misinformation" You're saying he isn't wrong in one sentence and then saying he is spreading misinformation... what? Besides thats exactly what he said as well. That the difference is so small, it should barely be considered, but that technically something like 800DPI and 0.5 ingame-sens is better than something like 400 and 1 ingame-sens. Which is correct.

[@honguyenbao7720]

thank you so much for doing the test, seriously!! ichange my settings from 2 sens 400 dpi to 0.375 sens 1600 dpi (which is 1.5 sens with 400 dpi), and my new "1.5 sens" is so smooth and feels like im playing at 2 sens. Keep up the good work man!!!

[@Z3t487]

Why not 0.5 1600 dpi?

[@agspda]

@@Z3t487 because the multiply factor at 1600 dpi is big.

[@Z3t487]

@@agspda I don't get it: 2 400 dpi is equals to is 0.5 1600 dpi.

[@druzzi9054]

@@Z3t487 yes i think he fucked up his maths

[@jeroenvdw]

Good job man, I'll be watching your future videos with these tests for sure. And I've learned it's better to use high DPI with lower sensitivity, will test this out now :)

[@Imabanana847]

I see that Bones Reds bearing 👀 Really cool machine you built.

[@kevinverholtz2663]

You have to be my favorite KZbinr. The information you present is always clear, concise, more creative and in depth than most other youtubers or even just trying to read up on information via forums. The amount of knowledge I feel I have gained just from watching your videos is enormous considering I am not even watching to gain knowledge but to just be entertained. So being able to consistently do both you definitely deserve praise.

[@unrealfeedzz]

May I just say, you're the most meticulous tester that i've found and that explains everything in such an easy manner. I also love the fact that you mention to be a gamer and play a lot of shooters and what not, so it's like good that I can relate more and I can understand things more. You're awesome :)

[@KG_BM]

This 1 man channel, just out researched LTT and GN

[@darkmanure]

Man actually plays games too.

[@hasanity5220]

@@darkmanure he’s actually good at them too. Gm in ow and immortal in valorant

[@devotedtospeed]

@@darkmanure unlike linus who reviews gaming products but can't even properly play games

[@FuckAssName]

I mean, Linus does have a family and a whole business to run, so that I can understand

[@xzraiderzx308]

Battlenonsense had done a video just like this a couple of months ago. He was the one that did all the research into it.

[@Rafael_Boog]

My man Ali deadass built a modern futuristic engineering type of shit to tell which mouse us faster in ms Really a legend

[@BrandonKyle7]

"modern futuristic engineering type of shit"

[@Rafael_Boog]

@@BrandonKyle7 indeed

[@CoolJosh3k]

I’d be interested in where the line is between physical DPI of the sensor and the interpolation used to reach higher DPI specs. For example, the actual sensor resolution might be 800DPI while interpolation allows it to figure out up to 3200DPI.

[@arconreef]

That's a misconception about mice. Interpolation is perfectly normal and happens at all dpi values. In fact, dpi has no effect on how the mouse calculates it's current position. Modern gaming mice always calculate their current position with the highest degree of accuracy that they are capable of, irrespective of the dpi value that you set. The dpi setting only changes how the mouse reports positional data to your computer.

[@eniff2925]

@@arconreef for example on my deathadder elite with pixart 3389 smoothing is first applied at 1900 dpi, then it doubles at 6000 and doubles again at 11300. Now in my pixart 3370 mouse it is only applied at and above 6500

[@Bees37]

Btw your thumbnails are completely insane

[@ponaskompetencija]

This was already known back in 2008, that is why i went from 400 dpi to 800 in quake. Plus tracking is far superior on higher dpi, less pixel skipping.

[@trustyTankadin]

Right? Like great to have some data to back this up and cool testing rig, but this has been known for well over a decade. Title of the video seems like click bait.

[@Dizzeke]

current mice will 1:1 pixel no matter what so long as your windows pointer speed setting is 6/11 (the middle) so you can use any dpi, i use 500 sometimes 550. no pixel skipping, thats just how many exact pixels will be covered per inch of mouse movement.

[@Airbag888]

Dude on his own putting out better quality video than the whole of LTT. Well done Also looking at my Razer Basilisk v3 26000 dpi from the corner of my eye...

[@Pericles777]

I started using 1600dpi as opposed to 800dpi back in 2016, havent looked back, when you play with high framerates you can feel and see the difference quite a bit more

[@abrahamalviarez5870]

Im using 2100 the last 2 weeks with 1000 polling rate and so far is amazing, also high dpi benefits from high hz monitors, with 165 hz monitor 2100 dpi feels better that 800 dpi

[@hxd9321]

I’ve been using 8000 dpi and I’m dropping people like fliesssss

[@rock31ful]

@@hxd9321 what's your ingame sens? thank you

[@greybuckleton]

Epic that you made your own kit to test this, really adds validity to what you say.

[@GiSWiG]

This and the PBO2 video is why I became a sub. I never thought that high DPI and low sensitivity would be a better way to go. And yeah, the Superlight is such a great mouse and the PowerPlay charging mat is so worth it. Being an old timer when we were lucky to have side buttons, the two side buttons of this mouse are great. The G502 I had before was just too heavy and to many miss-placed buttons.

[@hmdak]

Yk isa good day when Ali uploads a video

[@gdbroque]

Best day

[@nuclearsydrome9926]

fr

[@ambhaiji]

RocketJumpNinja: Well I'm Retiring to make my own mouse Optimum Tech: It's Free Real Estate

[@OnlySinusodial]

Honestly since rocket jump retired I feel this is the only other channel that's on his level or surpassed him

[@Serkong]

@@OnlySinusodial how did he retire? He still making vids

[@techienate]

This is the most underrated tech channel. Not only is the cinematography just god-level, he's also doing hard core science.

[@ebonilha]

Man, you always come up with content that everybody wanted but nobody made before. The effort you put into your videos, the topic choice relevancy, and production quality in general, make you my favorite overall content creator. Keep up!

[@pedrocaballero7590]

Man, great video. Two weeks ago a changed my DPI from 800 to 1600 and the sensitivity in valorant from 0.4 to 0.2 because I thought the input delay might be lower that way, and I was right! Your video is gold!

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

You wouldn't be able to notice the 1.7 millisecond difference in so-called latency between 800 and 1600 DPI. The latency "statistics" in this video for different DPI settings are flawed: this guy doesn't understand how DPI is properly used, so his "statistics" are worthless. If you properly pair your ingame sens with a DPI that is between 400 - 1600, you will be golden. If you don't understand, or have questions, ask me. Low DPI will only cause "low latency" or pixel skipping, as it should be called, if you have a high ingame sens. Low sens players do not have this issue. TLDR: DPI is your physical sensitivity button. If you have it low (i.e. 400), you better be using your arm, and if you have it high (1600+), you better turn down your ingame sens.

[@AkiDarkWolf]

As for me having thousands of hours spent in FPS, I wish I'd be able to switch from 400 to 800 DPI after your professional testing. The sad truth is, a lot of games don't offer fine enough adjustments or even low enough sensitivity values for me to consistently being able to use 800 DPI on all of them.

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

You don't need to mate, keep rocking 400 like a boss 🔥

[@nexxusty]

Any game I would play does. Apex for example.

[@hxd9321]

Or you could just get used to it

[@RabidChasebot]

I'm legitimately curious to see what the latency would be when cranked to like 16,000 DPI. I know diminishing returns and all, but still. Would be cool to see! Anyway, awesome video and really informative! Gonna experiment with turning my DPI up a bit and lowering in-game sens and see how it goes.

[@daniellake2377]

In Valorant I now use 20,000 DPI (max on Razer Viper Ultimate), 1 Windows Sens, 0.01 in-game sens. It's 200 eDPI. I can't say it's noticeable since I'm casual and use 120hz, but it's nice to be scientifically optimal

[@Machaas]

@@daniellake2377 can u even move ur mouse like that?(the cursor i mean)

[@daniellake2377]

@@Machaas With Windows sensitivity down to 1 it feels like a normal person's 1000 DPI

[@ItsdaFittySimp]

@@daniellake2377 that’s awful

[@msmc5379]

@@ItsdaFittySimp wait why? i just put my dpi to 8000 but 0.1 sens overall using rawaccel so it feels like a smoother 800dpi whats wrong so i can fix it

[@Nomvd90]

I’ve been trying to explain this for a while. Finally, someone who can do it. Thank you

[@Johnny31323]

Mouse latency via DPI doesn't change. This is measuring the change in pixel skipping and not latency. Pixel skipping is bigger at lower DPI due to the optical sensor detecting lower amount of images per sequence of the DPI. Be it 100 or 200 or 400 DPI. DPI if it had difference in latency, could be measured between two monitors with a high speed camera. One mouse should be connected to one PC with a DPI at 100 and the sensitivity of 10 inside any game. --- For the other mouse, it should be plugged into another PC with same specs or capped framerate to match the other PC. ( The dpi should be set to 1000 and sensitivity set to 1) The high speed camera should be able to tell the difference if the mouse with higher DPI makes it faster via a 360 inside some game. This doesn't happen tho, and they both act the same, no latency differences other than pixel skipping being less, which isn't a problem anyway unless you play at 1 DPI. Which who even does? 200 DPI is enough. So this is merely a marketing tactic showing off how you can make your mouse capture more data so your cursor moves faster ( sensitivity vise and not latency vise ) on desktop or games. Not shitting on your testing, just everyone so far that tested this, tested it completely wrong. Again, you simply tested Pixel skipping and how much less there is on higher DPI where as on lower DPI which isn't even that much. 🙄

[@gabrieldasilvamoreira9452]

After i saw a video from the battlenonsense channel a few months ago, i changed my dpi from 800 to 1600 and have noticed a big difference since then, the response time is noticeable and you can get a lot better accuracy.

[@ernestfrigelj2876]

sure

[@martinzhang5533]

Crazy how I myself as a gamer and a software/hardware engineer have never thought of this. Now that I think of that, Higher DPI +lower multiplier works like supersampling and lower DPI + higher multiplier is kind of like up sampling. I will definitely try doubling my DPI, although I doubt it would be able save my poor aim.

[@xzeraCS]

lower dpi is more accurate dont double ur dpi 🤣

[@ItsdaFittySimp]

Stick to low sens

[@RequiemOfSolo]

@@xzeraCS stop spewing ignorance.

[@ProFow]

but with higher sampling rate results in a sensor that's more susceptible to noise aka. (the slightest hand movement that you didn't intend to be picked up). This means that even the slightest movements will throw off your aim at the same eDPI.

[@RequiemOfSolo]

@@ProFow false because the lower in game sensitivity that you are using to compensate for the higher dpi means that the in game camera has much smaller angle increments it can look at. So whereas on say 800 dpi 3 sensitivity when you "hand jittered" you would skip say 1.5 angle increments, on 1600 dpi 1.5 sensitivity your "jitter" would smoothly travel across a finer degree of angles like 0.75 per count. Not to mention this makes micro adjustments way easier and smoother too so recovering from a jitter is easier, also not to mention having a smaller angle increment means everything visually looks smoother and higher fps since you aren't chopping over big angle jumps for every mouse movement which also makes aiming easier as visual fluidity is improved

[@Pupixario]

Amazing test! Very useful. One thing to consider is that FPS games where you typically do horizontal moves benefit from lower DPI, since your mouse has less vertical pixels to distract it when doing a horizontal move. Basically at lower DPI the movement is more straight or linear. At higher DPI it's more precise but this means your mistakes at doing straight lines are more pronounced.

[@flexabustbergson6141]

Nice I was wandering about this. So is this why most pros run 800 dpi?

[@frogxx28]

@@flexabustbergson6141 ye

[@Sickling3]

Exactly. 400 DPI arm did me better in consistency than 800 wrist. The numbers are never wrong but humans can be wrong

[@panjiyudha669]

High DPI + Low Mouse Sensitivity in game settings really boost my gaming experience

[@agab3asbgedsbef479]

placebo

[@George-wy2yb]

This is rediculous effort right here

[@jeagerkej3171]

Hehe “rediculous”

[@rezzo6127]

i have been playing on 800 dpi for 4 years now but have just swapped recently to 1600 dpi because of this video and haven't swapped back in the past 4 months, feels so much greater i recommend everyone to do the same

[@molavi65]

Great job testing and rating the mice. Love your style of presentation of data and results without shenanigan and unnecessary jargon. A true no nonsense style of testing.

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

The latency "statistics" in this video for different DPI settings are flawed: this guy doesn't understand how DPI is properly used, so his "statistics" are worthless. If you properly pair your ingame sens with a DPI that is between 400 - 1600, you will be golden. If you don't understand, or have questions, ask me. Low DPI will only cause "low latency" or pixel skipping, as it should be called, if you have a high ingame sens. Low sens players do not have this issue. TLDR: DPI is your physical sensitivity button. If you have it low (i.e. 400), you better be using your arm, and if you have it high (1600+), you better turn down your ingame sens.

[@KindOldRaven]

Unfortunately there's still quite some games that'll require you to have like 0.00142 sensitivity if you're planning to play on a low sens with high DPI.

[@doughy_]

i do it and have done it for years. It's not really that big of a deal

[@edddie7563]

Bro high dpi won’t make u any better stick to 400, this vid is bs haven’t even watched it but no point playing more than 400

[@frozenfenix0]

At 1600 for years, the first thing I do when playing a game for the first time is drop the sens by 75%, I don't even check first, its always, bar none, very fast.

[@ryleeterhark1482]

@@edddie7563 dpi or dots per inch means how many times a second your mouse reports to your pc yes it helps and no this is not bs

[@StillConfusing]

@@ryleeterhark1482 no, the rate it reports to the PC is the polling rate as most mice are USB and usb mice do not interupt, the DPI (really CPI) is the counts the sensor can read per inch. so at 800 dpi is 800 discreet steps the mouse can register in 1 inch, 1600 is 1600 dots

[@tmmy2ootuff843]

You did a good job building that tester. even looks well made like it was engeneered and manufactured. after lots of messin', I settled on 1600 and turn down in-game sens.

[@Hufsa]

Really great job done here letting the machines do the tests, I had in mind that higher dpi should work better but I didn't know how to measure, thank you a lot!

[@vladislavkaras491]

Really thanks for those tests! It was interesting to watch, and especially thanks for the last lifehack to turn DPI up and game sens down. Your testing equipment is shocking. Great job!

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

The latency "statistics" in this video for different DPI settings are flawed: this guy doesn't understand how DPI is properly used, so his "statistics" are worthless. If you properly pair your ingame sens with a DPI that is between 400 - 1600, you will be golden. If you don't understand, or have questions, ask me. Low DPI will only cause "low latency" or pixel skipping, as it should be called, if you have a high ingame sens. Low sens players do not have this issue. TLDR: DPI is your physical sensitivity button. If you have it low (i.e. 400), you better be using your arm, and if you have it high (1600+), you better turn down your ingame sens.

[@vladislavkaras491]

@@zephyr_cg_Legacy yeah, I have heard from a friend, that with high DPI you skip some pixels, what cause in-accuaracy, or as you said pixel skipping. So, my practical question, did you feel the difference yourself with low DPI, high sens and vice versa?

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

@@vladislavkaras491 if you stick to the 400-1600 DPI range you'll be fine. Just don't exceed 1600. My only point was that latency is not affected by DPI!

[@Gamermonk999]

i found this video on accident and out of curiousity i changed my settings from 400 dpi 8.2 sens to 1600 dpi 2.05 sens in ow2 and it definitely feels waaayyyy smoother. awesome work on this video!

[@sahilmeena8018]

Awesome video.The effort and thinking behind the testing needs to be appreciated more and got you a sub. I've always wondered if attaining the same eDPI with different mouse DPIs made a difference.

[@ryurenyama]

Really great tests, would love to see how different sensors perform on different mousepads/surfaces now

[@ikunaruLIVE]

THIS.

[@hemlock2343]

THIS. ☝

[@DeanVarney]

Yes, please!

[@mikem2022]

YES

[@DeputyFish]

1600 DPI from my experience with the superlight pro x is just perfect. was using 800 because thats what i always used. bumped it to 1600 after watching flats in overwatch and he said thats what he used (same mouse as me) and literally just increased my accuracy by so much

[@spektrumB]

Such in-depth analysis even Steve from Gamers Nexus will envy. Great job.

[@David-ym2vk]

Love the combination of tech, programming, and 3d printing. Very well done as usual.

[@haitsung6574]

*Gaming

[@Oni1975]

Very informative and interesting video. I hadn't thought of using higher DPI settings with lower sensitivity settings in the game. Thanks for this!

[@TRHardware]

wow! I didn't expect this kind of deep analysis from this channel! Excellent work with building that kind of testing setup!

[@ambhaiji]

Everything I wanted to comment about how everything this testing lacked was mentioned after 8:12 . You are definitely in path to be a true RJN successor.

[@Cojinkis]

in my opinion he already succeeds rjn

[@ironfn]

Bruh, I'm addicted to your cinematography

[@alksdng97834y]

Very creative and informative video. Nice

[@Quake199]

Thanks, hopefully this improves my Bronce V aim skills.

[@luigiadler]

wow, dude really went full science. Congrats on the effort bro, I was a lot but it was needed

[@RightySnipeZ]

Theres another factor which affects higher dpi, people with shaky hands. Try drawing a line in paint with 400 dpi vs anything higher. For me I was more consistent with 400.

[@yoshawtyismyproperty]

You can higher your in-game sens to make up for your higher dpi, so it wouldn't really matter aslong as yoi do that correctly.

[@RightySnipeZ]

@@yoshawtyismyproperty I've tried that too but I've benchmarked myself on aim trainers for years and 400 dpi is just better for fast aiming like pixel perfect accuracy.

[@ingtelcuy5462]

@@RightySnipeZ as someone with shaky hand, i relate to you, as soon as i change from 1000 to 800 dpi it just feel nicer, also that is the same time that i change my mouse from lightweight (80g) to brick weight (96g) and i feel more control over my movement edit: 76g, not 80g

[@RightySnipeZ]

@@ingtelcuy5462 Yeah lower is always better. I started on 800 but when ever I flick I found myself having to make micro adjustments in games and that was enough to get me killed then went to 400 and those micro adjustments are gone. Its just flick n click now. I too use slightly heavy mice 87g.

[@ingtelcuy5462]

@@RightySnipeZ dang i just changed to 400dpi yesterday and i started getting clutch like never before

[@paulapeno.]

"Why Gamers are Switching to High DPI" Me who started high DPI "Welcome, to paradise"

[@zipzinger9159]

i have been playing on 2400 for so long and people called me a fool i still pown em every day XD

[@jukka1996]

I'm absolutely in love with your content. All of your data would be enough to write a bachelors thesis and you do it "just" for informational purposes and your youtube account.

[@TontonGahu]

Seriously great test! I was actually wondering about the impact of low DPI on mouse tracking, did not consider the latency, I will clearly Double my DPI and Half my sensitivity for any future gaming =D

[@ItsdaFittySimp]

Im gonna try

[@zephyr_cg_Legacy]

The latency "statistics" in this video for different DPI settings are flawed: this guy doesn't understand how DPI is properly used, so his "statistics" are worthless. If you properly pair your ingame sens with a DPI that is between 400 - 1600, you will be golden. If you don't understand, or have questions, ask me. Low DPI will only cause "low latency" or pixel skipping, as it should be called, if you have a high ingame sens. Low sens players do not have this issue. TLDR: DPI is your physical sensitivity button. If you have it low (i.e. 400), you better be using your arm, and if you have it high (1600+), you better turn down your ingame sens.

[@ItsdaFittySimp]

@@zephyr_cg_Legacy frrr

[@zoldlen883]

This video was great. I've seen some other latency test for wireless mice from way bigger channels and you would think that a cave man came up with their idea of a test. Good Job!

[@Drew_HBK]

Taimou gave me this info years ago I'm surprised more people dont know this. Good work on the effort behind this though which is nuts

[@TimeTwiddler]

cool test rig! the high dpi / low sens combo is in-line with other tests done by 3kliksphilip and bananagaming.. looking forward to future tests!

[@martinbergman6066]

I feel we are missing an insight here? If we imagine that DPI is the amount of squares on a chessboard, and we use that chessboard as a mouse mat. Each square is a signal of movement from the mouse. So the higher DPI, the more squares on the chessboard. If we now drag our mouse across the chessboard - the smaller the squares, the faster the initial response of movement would be. But would higher DPI really reach its target faster?

[@richardfeynman1353]

No

[@Genome85]

No. Dragging both mice across the chessboard would take the same amount of time. Or rather, that's the assumption, the test in this video does not actually answer that question. Measuring the time-delay-to-first-square would show that the smaller square chessboard is "faster", but that's not a useful test because that's just another way of showing what DPI is....

[@GewelReal]

I did that for close to a decade. Running at native DPI but lowering the in-game multiplier makes for a small but very noticeable difference in smoothness

[@lizardpeter]

Great video, but why not test the Razer Viper 8K Hz? It has arguably the best sensor on the market and the fastest polling rate. It would definitely be interesting to see the results.

[@donaldlee1427]

thats what i wanted to see too!

[@crisnmaryfam7344]

Because it wouldn't be good for sponsor relations. Other people have done this and shown its nonsense marketing.

[@lizardpeter]

@@crisnmaryfam7344 Like who? All of the objective testing I have seen has shown that it’s pretty good.

[@DanilErofeev]

Not sure if you could call it latency actually in dpi testing - you need to cover more distance to register event in lower dpi vs higher. It's like measuring the time it takes to cover keystroke length in the keyboard before actual switch signal goes from it. If one keyboard has long keystroke and another is based on touch interface but you start to measure time when you touch it then it's not latency I believe?

[@ppeez]

It is latency in fact

[@edddie7563]

you are completely correct people are just npcs in these comments

[@dhrida5518]

I've been looking for this information for so long never found anything, today it just popped up on my feed, youtube is very weird! Thanks for the information! Very useful!

[@ukultur9237]

I really love this testing! This is some GN level testing :D Pure curiosity here, no engineer at all; With the stepper motors, and belt drive, could it not POTENTIALLY have slight variations in acceleration, or break-in/wear degradation, that could skew the results over time? I am sure that in this testing there are multiple tests take for each unit that is averaged in the end, so I don't suspect any true fault to be at hand. It was just that in my mind, when testing pure input latency over a path measuring up to 10 cm, I would think a dual solenoid piston action, one on each side, would remove any potential acceleration latency involved. Yes I have realized that the human hand does not snap 6 cm in any direction near instantaneously, but in measuring only the actual mouse sensors, I believe it would be more accurate. Thoughts?

[@termitreter6545]

There definitely are some potential inaccuracies, but if the tests are consistent enough, then it probably doesnt matter. Just gotta do a control group and its probably fine. Frankly, the actually message of the result seems to be mostly that it really doesnt matter. 400 DPI is a tiny bit slower, but with 800 DPI and beyond youre reaching differences that probably arent relevant for humans. Which makes sense and is consistent with testing that eg Battlenonsense did.

[@199t8]

I'm also wondering if he accounted for the time sound takes to travel, since sound takes nearly a millisecond to travel one foot :/

[@Boltwizard]

I have to question the results of the DPI test, if the sensitivity of your mouse pointer was too low you could effectively move the mouse a small amount without the cursors position moving a full pixel. This is something that is specific to using a mouse pointer and does not reflect the way that aiming in FPS games works.

[@Delalcon]

Why? It's the same as changing the screen one pixel to any side

[@handsomesquidward151]

This softboys guy thinks hes clever or something lmao

[@KillFrenzy96]

If your mouse DPI is too low and your in-game sensitivity is too high, you may find yourself being unable to aim at very far away targets due to this. If you use a high DPI and low in-game sensitivity, you can now make the little adjustments required to aim at a far away target. I generally use 800 DPI, otherwise some of my games would be too sensitive on their 0 sensitivity setting.

[@LilMonster860]

holyyyyyyyyyyy, i play rainbow six siege so every milisecond counts in a gunfight, i changed my sens from 12 to 1, dpi from 400 to 4800 and a huge improvment to my reaction time and gunskill, not just that but its much smoother and less skippy, going from a sens to a lower sens is just math, so say you use 10 sens 400 dpi, go to 4000 dpi at 1 sens, with sens's like 11 or 7(odd numbers) then for the 7 sens go from 400 dpi to 2800, the math is simple. you take your dpi and multiply it by 2, then youd have to cut your ingame sens in half to match you previous muscle memory but you keep doing so till you get one, it does get tricky so i found an easier way, say for 7 sens, 400x2=800 which would give us 3.5, you cant use 3.5 anyway but, then you take 800 dpi and mulyiplier it by that factor(3.5) giving us 2800, you can do this for any sens, works best with mice that have an app where you can use dpi's like 150 or 8550 by user choice in settings, i hope i helped at least one person get better, LOVE YALL

[@yuinekonyan5153]

You should measure the latency up to the maximum supported by the mouse and check whenever too high actually becomes bad. Otherwise why not just max the mouse dpi and lower in-game sensitivity.

[@aurah8245]

maxing dpi / sens and lowering sens / dpi will lead to pixel skipping. It's best to go medium sens on both dpi and ingame sens rather than doing like 6400 dpi and very low ingame sens. 400 - 800 - 1600 are all very good dpis to play on and the very very large majority of competitive players use these dpis.

[@kayj312]

⁠​⁠@@aurah8245the point of the video is to reveal new knowledge about optimizing your settings. Most professional gamers have been playing for 10+ years and simply keep what’s comfortable. 2ms is imperceptible but still technically gives an edge.

[@DarkellVein]

Finally, someone that tells me that my 2000dpi setting for all is somehow worth it somehow

[@RayDimn]

Same here whit my 1600 DPI

[@lukeomara698]

I play on 20k dpi lol

[@ernestocastellanos6446]

@@lukeomara698 20K? Bro, just thinking about moving your mouse already moves it across the screen 😂

[@lukeomara698]

@@ernestocastellanos6446 I turn my sens settings in windows and in games to some crazy low shit

[@YoussefShawky]

3500 dpi here

[@LeBassDiaries]

I rewatch every mouse video. Thanks for all the info / testing.

[@BlindBison]

The problem I have with 1600 DPI is many games don’t let their in game sens go low enough for my taste so I pretty much have to use 800 so my effective sensitivity is as low as I want it to be.

[@aidencraft32]

that's the only issue I have also, enough for me to stay at 800 tbh

[@oli_ctu]

Can we appreciate the amount of work that’s put in this video? The visual quality and the quality of the presentation is next to none. Great video ✌🏻

[@LightningWingMLP]

I changed for an a 800DPI to a 1600DPI about two and a half months ago and I can say getting used to a new DPI is a mane factor for people going to a higher one but the change makes smaller movements when tracking and micro adjustments way easier

[@Fesal-rq4nb]

In osu if i want to use 26k dpi i need to make the sinsitivity 0.08 , is it like better or should i stay800 dpi with 2.81 sensitivity?

[@HerobrineGaming]

Me who was using high DPI for a long time and only switched recently: *bruh*

[@bibo3282]

I had the same situation because I came from console originally so I thought high dpi was the normal until around recently

[@Humbulla93]

i always played with maximum DPI, because i´m lazy to move the mouse so much

[@TcSomers]

I'll try and do some controlled testing of my own, but from personal experience of playing at 3200 DPI for 8ish years, switching to 400 DPI 2 years ago might as well have been magic with how much it improved my gameplay. Yes in sterile testing higher DPI looks like a straight up improvement. But the reality is that humans are....human. Higher DPI means you're more prone to micromovements and jitters affecting your aim more. If you're a professional level gamer, higher DPI might be more beneficial, but for even above average gamers it really isn't helping. When my friends stream their games, we can easily tell if their DPI is too high by how twitchy their mouse movements are. We've convinced nearly all of our friends to drop their DPI to the 400-500 range and every single person has noticeably improved their ability to click targets.

[@nullbeyondo]

I've been telling this to people for years just to get shouted by "all big streamers use low dpi" so it must be better! Out of at least a 100 gamer I know, I was the only one who used high dpi with low sensivitity config. Finally now people are starting to understand.

[@mortemus9562]

I have always tuned my mouse to about 1.3k dpi and lowered ingame sensitivity, idk why but just felt like the right way to do it (mostly because i prefer higher sens outside games)

[@Ethan-rm1ns]

wow Im at the same situation

[@jeffreythiers1228]

Same. It just made sense. Everyone always judged me for my high dpi.

[@jaytee7048]

I used to be heavily into aim training. I thought you were supposed to drop dpi, and raise sensitivity to avoid pixel skipping?

[@K.youran]

@@jaytee7048 it's the other way around, pixel skipping comes with low dpi and high sensitivities, to fix it you go to higher dpi and lower sensitivities, you don't really need to be in 1600, but anything around 800~1600 works, far as I know if your polling rate is 1000hz you should use 800~1600, and 3200 if it's 2000hz, but a lot of people said how anything above 1000hz is a marketing scam and does nothing outside of using more cpu resources

[@erichagele]

Optimum Tech is a true expert in the PC gaming space. His technical knowledge and relatable reviews are unrivaled by any other KZbinr. Outstanding video. 😎

[@Scrumbly]

I know this is a year old but as an industrial metrologist, i have to express my excitement at seeing someone perform gage repeatability tests. You, sir, are a true scientist. Gg

[@samuelviden7412]

Quite interesting. I'm definitely going to try 1600 DPI and halve my sensitivity (I usually play on 800 with 1:1 sensitivity in game).

[@MrKfloz]

What do you mean by 1:1? I'm new to all this

[@samuelviden7412]

@@MrKfloz Some games will let you adjust the sensitivity in game. With a 1:1 ratio, the mouse will have the exact same sensitivity as you set the DPI to.

[@MrKfloz]

@@samuelviden7412 ohh okay ty!

[@zipzinger9159]

@@samuelviden7412 wrong, a lot of games will have diffrent ways of interpeting your mouse input only time you are right with this statement is when you have the option for the game to use raw input