Why is the Hammerhead Ship Design so Popular in Star Wars?

[@harronus7758]

"Looked like a hammer." *Cue picture of a wrench* Me: "Wait... that isn't right." ಠ_ಠ

[@jameslewis2635]

What we call a wrench in the UK kind of matches what we would call the guy who inserted that picture in this video. A spanner.

[@darthbradmedia8929]

Harronus (intercom sound) Screw up on aisle Technological Support!! 😂😂😂

[@kostakatsoulis2922]

Face palm

[@texas1872]

Anything can be a hammer, whether it survives or not, after being used as such, is a different story.

[@social3ngin33rin]

Best sh!t ever!!!! Ty editor!!! ^_^

[@harryobriensmith40]

Alternative theory: They lasted so long because everyone agreed they just looked bloody cool

[@darthbradmedia8929]

Harry Obriensmith That’s probably why Lucasfilm brought them into Canon, because so popular!

[@matthewmohri9990]

I had not even read your response. I saw the thumbnail and though "Ummm...I looks cool?"

[@dcmbb3]

The "Rule of Cool" has been enacted.

[@mikiroony]

The entire crew save of the captain were Warhammer 40k orks. Waaagh! rule applies: if we think it works, it works.

[@robgoodsight6216]

hahahahahaha

[@MrDelta509]

"Should be credited with the best kill of the war in my opinion." Gimli: That still only counts as one!

[@rhettorical6128]

MrDelta509 Luke blowing out the first Death Star, and Lando blowing up the Second Death Star, “Are we a joke to you?”

[@EvilFookaire]

@@rhettorical6128 KK and RJ in unison while molesting a stormtrooper: "Yes.... yes you are..."

[@jay-1800]

Rhettorical lol and I was just going to say the A-Wing pilot that kamikazed and brought down the executor

[@Boom__6678]

@@rhettorical6128 look at it this way, if the ship hadden't done that, victory against the empire might've been impossible, so technically any other kill is an assist for them. Right ?

[@peregry]

A consideration you actually might have missed: If you place turrets on the hammerhead at the top and bottom as well as midway port and starboard, each of those turrets actually have GREATER arcs of fire than the typical weapons we see on similar designs, and when you combine the four positions, you actually have near perfect firing arc coverage (save close in directly aft, but if you move far enough aft the high mountings of the upper and lower guns would also give aft coverage) with any position having two to three guns able to be brought to bear and in the forward arc all four guns. Combine that capability with more powerful individual guns (again, the weapons on the Hammerheads appear to be larger than weapons on similarly sized ships) you get a design philosophy focused on long range, accurate, powerful fire over volume of fire like what Star Destroyers appear to prefer). Combined with the narrow forward profile and the Hammerhead clearly has a strong matchup against ships in similar weight classes as they likely can engage at LONGER ranges, bring more firepower to bear on any given firing arc, all while minimizing fire taken due to the narrow profile.

[@woodliongaming7383]

peregry How many people only read the top paragraph

[@maxb9335]

Psalms 92 verse 12

[@theevildrummingsithlord1492]

@@woodliongaming7383 Believe me, this isn't even the longest comment I've seen on KZbin.

[@akstormtrooper508]

I read all of it...and YES. This is what I want in my fleet, not as my flagship, but my escort fleet as the spearhead.

[@peregry]

@Galactic Tech Creator The comments apply to both, but definitely more to the Cruisers, as if you look at the weapons on the Cruisers they have top and lower emplacements while the corvettes don't.

[@HolyknightVader999]

In-universe reason: the Hammerhead was a design that served the Republic well for 4000 years, and its reliability, as well as its iconography rooted in Republic history, ensured it a long service life despite there being bigger, better ships even in the Old Republic era. Real-life reason: People love KOTOR and the people owning Star Wars use the Hammerhead style of warship to tickle their nostalgia boners and take their money.

[@MrJacobkoh]

Ramming Speed!!!!!

[@nathanbrown8680]

In other words, Gareth Edwards, unlike all the morons Disney had direct their other Star Wars films, realized that the audience for Star Wars films was Star Wars fans.

[@HolyknightVader999]

@@nathanbrown8680 Exaclty.

[@HolyknightVader999]

@dar'man beskar Ordo I agree. Even female Revan would be sickened with them.

[@ufoinsider6932]

Yes and 🤣

[@pyeitme508]

No wonder why the design in legends lasted for 4000 years.

[@crazyguy1mania537]

No kidding, robust and badass. These things are friggin AWESOME 👌

[@pyeitme508]

@@crazyguy1mania537 agree

[@jeromeespinosa2139]

0:30 PrOcEeDs To ShOw A WrEnCh

[@darthbradmedia8929]

Jerome Espinosa Harronus (intercom sound) Screw up on aisle Technological Support!! 😂😂😂

[@trentoncoldwell7771]

I lost faith in this boy ever being a man

[@NHDude]

As the owner of a police model Explorer, I can attest the extra bracing welded into the frame makes it a beast in a collision (it's happened to me twice so far). So assuming the corvette is lacking heavy kinetic shielding which is really neglected in Star Wars canon, thick metal structuring can turn a ship into a battering ram.

[@JaelaOrdo]

If all you have is a hammer, every problem begins to look like a nail

[@Saint_nobody]

I'd smash that. 😜

[@theevildrummingsithlord1492]

Where's that quote from?

[@isaiahwolftail867]

That's why Domestic violence exist. Yaw honestly.

[@scottyfox6376]

@@theevildrummingsithlord1492 World War Z maybe kinda?

[@scottyfox6376]

@@isaiahwolftail867 what do mean ? Thought we is talking about tools & stuff.

[@akissotiriou6009]

0:30 "Due to its narrow body, the bridge looked, in fact, like a gammer* *proceeds to show picture of wrench despite having picture of hammer on TV behind him during entire video*

[@darthbradmedia8929]

Akis Sotiriou Harronus (intercom sound) Screw up on aisle Technological Support!! 😂😂😂

[@kostakatsoulis2922]

You know it does look like a wrench

[@akissotiriou6009]

@@kostakatsoulis2922 It kinda looks like 2 wrenches facing each other

[@timothytimothy4854]

@@akissotiriou6009 yes it does look like a gamer

[@casbot71]

So first the Rebels had to pull a win out of nowhere at Scarff, then they had to get the luckiest shot ever near Yarvin, before finally having a deus ex machina from killer teddy bears. You know, in retrospect the Empire really did have a streak of bad luck, they really should've won.

[@marcbartuschka6372]

Even more if you consider how close the Empire came to kill many high ranking rebels at Hoth and other narrow escapes...

[@kevind3974]

@@marcbartuschka6372 plus Vader refused to kill luke because he thought he could be turned, when in reality he didn't want to kill his only (known) child. then you add in the fact that Palpatine wanted to turn luke as well which led to his and Vader's death

[@MrIan1086]

One in a million chances work 9 times in ten.

[@KuraIthys]

Blah, blah something, something the force... ;p

[@bondankai13]

not bad luck, just plot armor

[@strivingforheaven]

"The ship did in fact look for a hammer, " shows a picture of a pipe wrench.

[@casbot71]

7:14 "So we can create stronger materials…" Like cheese? Lunar astronauts Wallace and Gromit approve.

[@daveygivens735]

Think about it. As proven in Rogue, if you have a ship design that has a super-reinforced front-end, you always have an option to prevail in a space battle, regardless of the number or power of the opponent's weapons.

[@darthbradmedia8929]

Why is the Hammerhead so popular? Knights of The Old Republic!!!

[@edelta88]

Mostly nostalgia.

[@MrJacobkoh]

Ramming Speed!!!!!

[@TheRezro]

@@edelta88 It is also good ship. It isn't Y-Wing what has in-universe reason to not be present in sequels. But crybaby fanboys wanted it.

[@ShadowGaming-ft4fh]

TheRezro they could have gone with a replacement of the y wing if the replacement was better than a snail

[@TheRezro]

@@ShadowGaming-ft4fh They did. T-85

[@johnserviusmason9793]

Keep in mind "ramming ships" are actually a class of vehicles. Depending on the shields they usually protect against most laser fire and depending on the shielding it may also protect against straight up physical attacks like if forces tried to board a ship from the outside(separatists and republic both showcased this strategy in the shows and movies). Chances are Hammerhead Corvettes were actually intended to be used in tandom with the y-wings and subsequent ion attacks. Kind of a "last option" tactic but still one they probably didnt just make up on the spot. In regards to the Old Republics use of the ship you could maybe explain the hammerhead as a cost:impact. The republic of that era was crippled after the wars with the mandos and further with Revan+Mal would have taxed the republics forces even further. Potentially developed the ship specifically because they were backed into a corner and needed to embrace tactics that would allow a balls to the walls; honey glazed 100% offense. Added point would be that Bastilas battle meditation would have made weird ships like this make more sense in the long run.

[@casbot71]

A modification of the Hammerhead philosophy/design would be to mount _as many weapons as possible_ in turrets near the end of the blade/head. That gives them maximum coverage. The heaviest guns on the end of the hammerhead in 360° coverage front back and sides. The other guns mounted on the sides of the hammer, still far enough out to be able to target behind (as well as to the relevant side and either fully top or bottom and part of the other aspect). The Hammer becomes a way to give front mounted guns clearance over the engines and rear of the ship. Thus it can run rampant through a enemy formation, getting out of the firing arcs of traditional ships, while still being able to bring a lot of firepower to bare - yes your would lose a little bit of firepower compared to the _head on angle of attack,_ but not much. It also would've been a good design philosophy for the New Republic StarHawk class battleship that was featured so prominently in TROS …?

[@madhatten00]

Yes. Rotating turrets all over the head.

[@TheNewsDepot]

It's also possible that the hammerhead used tractor beams to "soften" the impact similar to how a crumple zone works. This would also explain why the acceleration right before the impact. They would have needed to overcome the tractor beams pushing against the Stardestroyer.

[@MrAranton]

Nope. The tech that allowed the hammerhead to survive was non other than plot armour.

[@krispalermo8133]

@@MrAranton Star Trek: internal structural integrity fields ..... Plot armor....

[@thomasl8810]

@@krispalermo8133 Actually, according to Star Trek Online, it's called Polarized Lattice-Optimized Tritanium Armor.

[@krispalermo8133]

@@thomasl8810 Other than S.T. O.L. which is or is not current canon. But thank you for bring that up. I don't care what the " official " wants to call canon, I just need to hear something that makes reasonable sense for what I am seeing. I used to play RPG, and we/ the game shop I went too was always trying to make up crap on the fly to keep the game story play moving. If that didn't work, out comes the note pad for math work. My shop liked to run space combat like the movies " Hunt for Red October," and Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan."

[@LineOfThy]

@@MrAranton That is just untrue in every possible fashion.

[@republiccommando6104]

Generation Tech: “The Hammerhead is one of the best designed ships.” Republic Ship Designers: “WRITE THAT DOWN! WRITE THAT DOWN!”

[@AJukes3132]

I remember watching that hammerhead scene in theaters and it absolutely blew my mind, it was the coolest thing i had ever seen in star wars

[@nemesis7774]

Hammerhead cruiser: "I'm proud of you, little one"

[@jedihunter1015]

Good anikin good.

[@darthbradmedia8929]

James Tribble It’s Spelled Anakin.

[@annusrideviravindran6396]

James Tribble *anakin

[@nemesis7774]

@@annusrideviravindran6396 We cannot use capital letter for someone who never got the rank of master.

[@theuniversedoesntcare]

Grave-Stone: "I LOVES MUH BABY HAMMERHEADS! MOMMA PROUD HAMMERS!"

[@cancelanime1507]

Because it looks like a hammerhead shark so it scares away the dolphins..

[@darthmemeious9526]

I hate dolphins... They're course, rough And iritating. And they get everywhere!

[@scottwendt9575]

Humanity First

[@cancelanime1507]

Scott Wendt Indeed

[@DeltaVe]

Top underrated comment.

[@alphariusfuze8089]

And pizza

[@LoboApache]

I've always figured the reason why the Hammerhead ship (which is by far my favorite ship design) survived for so long was because of the republics ability to field such strong axillary ships and star fighters, particularly when the Jedi assisted the various Republics throughout history. Really powerful forward facing Ship-Of-The-Line with smaller ships that can block, shield, or destroy anything that would come in from the sides would be a very good tactic. Plus in the case of the Battle of Scarif, Hammerhead Corvette would have maximum shielding and armor on the bridge area allowing for it to repel most attacks. So it would function like an old Greek Trireme

[@mattborgens3008]

Its a great idea for destroyer and corvette size ships. Love the scene in rogue one, the only part that bothered me was the imperial crew being thrown around during impact. The crew of the star destroyer (a ship thats at least 12x the size) should barely feel the impact of a tiny corvette.

[@Akazaji]

While thats true, if their power was entirely offline, its possible the inertial compensators would also be offline, so they'd feel the full impact of vessel slamming into them much in the same way you would feel the concussion of an impacting bullet despite being over a hundred times larger. The speed of the impact means a lot.

[@elijahsellers3727]

@@Akazaji very true

[@humech]

I literally jumped out of my seat when I saw the hammerhead in Rogue One, i was so excited haha

[@barnabykeen8131]

Ah yes, the great smashy boi

[@elfthreefiveseven1297]

I always thought of ion weapons as tripping all the breakers \ blowing the fuses on a ship. It would not destroy it, but resetting the breakers and replacing the fuses would take time. Also rebooting the computers and interface terminals. At least that is how I imagine it.

[@stealthninjadude5334]

"so we can make stronger materials," says Allen while he shows a picture of cheese.

[@raxsavvage]

haven't had a single one of these suggested in ages the hell

[@theuniversedoesntcare]

Grave-Stone: "Momma proud of the HAMMERHEADS!"

[@EvilFookaire]

Koth better bring me *_MY_* ship back if he values having a skull to keep his teeth in...

[@andrewbernard1911]

This video really added to my enjoyment of that scene. It’s really cool seeing the rebels use such an aggressive ship for such an aggressive maneuver in a high stakes battle.

[@CHRF-55457]

Tbh, I'd pick the Harrower class sith dreadnought for ramming another enemy ship. The command bridge is far away from the bow which helps keeps the command bridge from getting crushed upon impact when being used to ram an enemy ship. Also, the forked pong shaped of the Harrower's bow lets it be reinforced for raming actions as well too. I'd definitely be using that shape to jam it right in between someone's command bridge like the Venator's or the Imperial Star Destroyers. Or to sever a Nebula B frigate in half.

[@JordoValentino]

"MSG: IBO" has really good in-universe reasons for "hammerhead-style" ships. It mainly revolves around heavier armor on the leading edge, with smaller aft dimensions to give cover to the less heavily armored portions. Makes the ships pretty hard nuts to crack using full-frontal attack strategems.

[@Newscast101]

Imperial star commanders: ha ha the rebels can’t hurt us A-wing Pilot: KAMIKAZE

[@nahuelleandroarroyo]

Banzaiiiiiii

[@zerox8413]

Many years later... First Order: they can't hurt us... Holdo: PERHAPS TODAY IS A GOOD DAY TO DIE... PREPARE FOR RAMMING SPEED!!!

[@AaronDarkus]

What find more ironic is that "tecno banzai" or the famous japanese suicidal phrase from WWII actually can be translated as "for the emperor" (from what I know) And rebels who are fighting against the empire ruled, of course, by an emperor. You know......

[@bondankai13]

@@AaronDarkus Tennoheika banzai "long live his majesty the emperor"

[@ethanhudson9226]

They were already going down anyways.

[@austinwatson1612]

“Looks like a hammer” Inserts photo of a pipe wrench

[@Wand422]

They always use kind of obscure humor. I think it's a reference to many peoples childhoods trying to turn any heavy metal object into a hammer whne you didn't have a hammer available. I love this kind of humor.

[@jamesleduke873]

@@Wand422 not just children. There were a number of times in engineering school I'd use a wrench to force a stubborn part to go where it was supposed to.

[@michaelhowze8198]

@@Wand422 That's just called being poor had nothing to do with being a kid. See also using butterknifes as screwdrivers

[@richarddoig1865]

The renowned pipe wrench cruiser. Excellent for removing Imperials.... or clogged pipes.

[@killcat1971]

The ships used thrust based engines in sublight, thrust is at the rear so weapons need to be at the front (or at least facing forward).

[@eldrenofthemist2492]

Give me a Fleet of Hammer Head ships. RAMMING SPEED!!

[@ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681]

Having a ship part that is wide or tall makes sense, since you can place sensors on both ends. Having several sensors in a line is same as having one giant sensor. NASA uses this for the SETI project, having a line of sensors several kilometers long that works like one giant dish, several kilometers long. The benefits are of course massive in capability. The Hubble uses the same technique, taking a picture of a target in one end of its orbit, and a second one in the other, making a dish comparable to larger than Earth itself.

[@bernardcornellisvanmeijere4375]

Simply put Hammerhead ships are sexy and well designed!

[@Daniel509476]

Diggin your shows Bro! Thanks for doing the history of the Clone Wars. Been keeping squared away when I am not working at the hospital.

[@AzraelThanatos]

For the hammerhead, it's also a dedicated warship, meaning more likely to be heavily armored and with a reinforced frame along with everything else, it was also a controlled collision from that side of the fight against a, largely, disabled star destroyer. The transport is a cargo ship with guns and bits of armor strapped to it. If you notice, the Corellian Corvette also follows the same basic hammerhead look, just rotated...

[@titoelcolombiano]

Allan, you've got a great voice for these videos and I really enjoy your presentation style

[@Rylus571]

The hammerhead design also has an arch, an arch can sustain more wait in a structure than a straight beam ever could.

[@krank6]

“Looks like a hammer” Inset picture of a pipe wrench.

[@Daniel-wu6pl]

this is the way

[@skyeboy821]

Also, by having such a design you can load the front with armor. A couple meters of durasteel plating on top of a moderate shield would make the ship very tough. The armor might also explain why the front of the ship didn’t suffer more damage. It might actually be designed as a ram for desperate situations.

[@marcbartuschka6372]

In that case you could say that the design is not SO well thought. I mean they have made a cockpit with open windows in that same front, and I guess that is not THAT strong...

[@LineOfThy]

​@@marcbartuschka6372 It is pretty strong, in fact. Also, the target is really small

[@ThrawnFett123]

So I would point out the mid 60s Chrysler Imperials, they had full X-frames that were boxed out and were so strong they were banned from demolition derby's. The body and passengers were the limit points for them, not the frames, and was a design philosophy quickly abandoned as overkill in the wrong direction. I view the hammerheads similarly. In legends Old Republic ramming was a decently viable tactic, and as pointed out the hammerheads shape is a great way to transfer pure force with two triangles meeting at a common point, the strongest part of a triangle. I assume they had reinforced and overbuilt frames as a legacy of their thousands of years long design line, and inertial compensation combined with armor (both things that are standard for a warship in starwars) eliminates the two real world weaknesses that would make it not worth keeping. The long narrow profile would allow long strong beams to be run down the ships spine from thruster to bow, these could be tied together by X's creating highly protected compartments between (ideal for warships anyway) the X's, and the rigidity would allow the ship to ram or operate as an emergency tug offering flexibility in battle. The benefits outweigh the risks thanks to inertial dampening, meaning no reason to change, meaning even if no one remembered exactly WHY it was this way originally, they'd have no reason to adjust.

[@garygcrook]

I'd like to add two things to this. First is that there were variants to this design ethos, like the Paladin-class Corvette, where the hammerhead Bridge section was rotated to be horizontal. This would still allow the Bridge to still act as the main focal point in a head-on fight with a ship that is arranged horizontally. The second is that with defence focussed on the hammerhead Bridge it is simpler and more cost effective to attach Ablative Armour to just this section to improve defence rather than over the entire ship. Plus Ablative Armour would help explain the Lightbringer's ability to survive the impact with the ISD, as it would absorbed part of the impact with its destruction.

[@hansmerker5611]

Here's a theory: Hammerhead corvette + Consular class cruiser= CR-90 corvette.

[@kingnamor777]

You mean putting both designs together? To make a even more unique and powerful ship?

[@hansmerker5611]

@@kingnamor777 No, i mean that they combined the Hammerhead with the consular to make the CR-90.

[@kingnamor777]

@@hansmerker5611 Ohhhhhh I get now. Because CR-90 is very similar to both ships. The ships maker probably got the idea to create the CR-90 from the Hammerhead corvette and the Cousular class corvette as well🤔.

[@hansmerker5611]

@@kingnamor777 exactly

[@mikiroony]

What's it made of, you say? Well, the strongest material in the 'verse. Even stronger than Mythril. It's called Plotium.

[@rljpdx]

yes, they function great as space 'tugs'. good call, great reporting, great channel. i approve

[@biomewanderer6312]

The hammer head will also spread the impact force across the head of the ship. It looks to me like the whole ship is just made for ramming. Oversized head, frontal guns, oversized engines, long slim body to spread impact evenly across the ship. Yup, its meant for ramming and pushing

[@minasegazi4000]

Watching this I noticed you actually do see some of her frame crumpling. My guess is they used there shields to reinforce the ship for the manuver. She dident move the imperial class fast at first, but I gotta give props to this being the first time we see in star wars using inertial physics to your advantage. Without power, you could move the star distoryer with the force of the hammerhead Corvette here. Mind you, Corvette dispite being in relative one peice was if fact totaled. Her engines where fried and her frame warped.

[@WhisperXK]

"Looks like a hammer" Shows a wrench

[@QuantumShow2022]

The comic Holdo in the Age of Resistance shows even more of that ship's design was carried through to the Corvette/Blockade Runner design-- in the issue she blasted a weak spot through a Star Destroyer and weakened it enough to physically punch through with her Corvette's WHOLE SHIP. That makes me think she was a ships nerd and knew of this structural feature, and used it

[@womboning4276]

Line formations have been around for a pretty long time in naval battles. Less profile means smaller target. Considering the thing is made for bum rushing straight into the enemy as opposed to broadsiding that's about the best you can do.

[@rfletch62]

When I heard Hammerhead, I thought "Shark". Video shows a pipe wrench. Well, silly me!

[@daanvos194]

Now i get why they call it a HAMMERhead

[@jameslewis2635]

The theory of why the hammer head corvette is shaped in such a way works. It is the same reason as to why tank armour is concentrated at the front of the vehicle. As such having a thicker amount of armour plating on the front of the ship than you would see in most ship designs also makes sense. I also think there is a history in the Star Wars cannon of such designs being made with ramming in mind.

[@josephkim9944]

I thought the hammerheads use in scarif was really cool because it reminded me of the korean admiral Yi Sun Shin and his use of the turtle ships. Plus its really funny to see, in a galaxy as advanced as star wars, people saying screw it and just ram into each other with their ships.

[@kevind3974]

hay what can we say a good kamakazi will never go out of style

[@casualsleepingdragon8501]

TO SHOW YOU THE POWER OF FLEX TAPE!

[@death13a]

Hammer head protects body of the ship from slight angle of top and bottom so you can concentrate armor at from then spread it around, battles are messy so allowing you to plow through a debris is added advantage and if you put turrets on top and bottom they will have good firing arcs

[@XLratTail]

No hammers were harmed in the making of this video.

[@EWLR89]

"Stronger material" *THINLY SLICED CHEESE*

[@ArnandKularajah]

One more point, the hammerhead bridge design allows those ships to tow/store containers behind it. Indeed in the Sphyrna-class we see cargo containers behind the lower hammerhead along the underside of its "neck" being lowered on elevators attached to the hammerhead in Rebels.

[@cursedpotato3404]

9:10 look at how menacing that looks

[@zacharybaskin2402]

Can you do more what if videos, I really enjoy them

[@rook1513]

I really don't know why I would admit this, but here goes: I now understand why the two Destroyers collided in Episode V. I never realized one of the ships was dead in space. Sit semper vis vobiscum.

[@river.m2010]

The Blockade Runner and this are my two favourite ships

[@DraconimLt]

The design feature that Hammerhead ship had that allowed it to survive a crash like that was plot armour, pure and simple!

[@bengrogan9710]

There is another reason for the hammerhead design. All aspect firing arcs - The tips of the hammers will have 360 degree rotational freedom and can elevate or depress beyond the level of the flat parallel plane This means that the protruding spurs of the hammers make perfect defensive anti-fighter weapon mounts as they allow even the rear of the ship to be covered effectively vs Tie fighters or Tie Bombers with Ion weapons that could try disable them

[@joekrafft7125]

these ships. both the cruiser and corvette are the perfect blockade runners. due to the ships being designed from the ground up for frontal assault from the fairly large front cannons to just the sheer armor designed for ramming speed. you could just literally push the enemies out of the way or cut your way through by ramming

[@daddyvoodoo9820]

0:30 "Hammer"

[@daswordofgork9823]

RAMMING SPEED! is the reason why.

[@Tacwolf1030]

0:32 those dolphins got him. That ain’t a hammer that’s a wrench

[@dabeardoesstuff5412]

The official cannon says that Captain Kado Oquoné (the corvette captain that made the star destroyer go boom) died in the crash, even though him and his crew were all uninjured after the impact, along with the fact that the ship looked mostly undamaged. I would like to think that he escaped the crash by somehow getting an escape pod as he was a badass captain and I doubt he would just die like that

[@thebighurt2495]

CEC's official motto in-universe was "CEC: It won't stop moving 'till it hits something."

[@andrewjustice210]

0:31 Holy crap! That is a beautiful hammer you have! Where on earth did you find such an exquisite hammer?

[@danielolsson7134]

The Lightmaker was destroyed when it reached the sheild gate protecting Scarif.

[@davidragan9233]

The only thing I would change on the Hammerhead would be to add turbo lasers to the dorsal and ventral tips of the bow, that would give it an amazing fire arc.

[@stuglife5514]

Like a hammer *shows clamp wrench* god I love this channel

[@hoytrichardson3448]

A few points: 1) Slim head on shoot is reminiscent of an attack helicopter. This is for much the same reason. Narrow, hard to hit. 2) In legends, the Hammer Head cruiser was ridiculously durable with about the best structural integrity in Star Wars. The Endar Spire to a heavy beating over Taris, crash into the planet, and was found largely intact hundreds of years later. (This also mean that it some how survive the bombardment of Taris). 3). If you look closely at the film, only the armor was damage in the collision with the star destroyer. The armor crumpling functioning much the same way a car crumple zone would. Also, when you look at the armor on the Hammer Head design, it appears to be much heavier than the armor on other ships of its size. 4) The engines are way oversized. It’s little wonder it could push a “dead in the water” Star Destroyer. 5) The Hammer Head just looks awesome.

[@johnhickman8391]

"The bridge did look like a hammer" *shows a pipe wrench*

[@DavidRichardson153]

I'm going from a completely different source, but it does make sense for the Hammerhead's weapons to be more fixed (if not completely fixed). In the game Elite Dangerous, you have a choice between three different weapon mounts: fixed, gimballed, and turret. The fixed and turret are fairly self-explanatory, and the gimballed is the compromise between the two. The mount to go for depends on the ship you're piloting and how you plan to fight. Fixed weapons are best suited to fighters (which are an option to add to the largest ships) and the smallest of ships, mainly due to their high agility and smaller profiles. As you move on to larger ships (that is, if you want to go bigger), you lose a lot of that agility, so to make it theoretically easier to fight, you need weapons that can fire offbore. Even with this, there are strengths and weaknesses to each mount. First though, let me preface that each weapon comes in differing sizes and sub-variants (like the A, B, C, etc. models of fighter planes) and some of these are only available for certain ship sizes, so there is no be-all-end-all weapon for any ship. Plus, there is also the different weapon types - laser, plasma, kinetic (i.e. bullets), missile, torpedo, mine, etc. - that all have their own strengths and weaknesses, but I'm not getting into those here. Fixed weapons are the most powerful mount. They cause the most damage per hit, almost always have the highest rate of fire, and more often than not have the largest clip sizes (or continuous firing periods for lasers). However, because they are fixed in position, if your ship is not even remotely agile, they will be quite useless in a fight. You get a targeting system to help you aim them properly, but again, without agility, good luck actually hitting your target. Turrets have full rotational capability and they come with an auto-fire feature (for solo players). They don't rotate particularly fast, but they are fast enough to make avoiding them very tough, especially when there's some distance. However, they tend to be the weakest mount, typically causing the least amount of damage per hit and somewhat slower firing rates (firing periods and clip sizes depend more on the sub-variant). Plus, the shape of the ship they mounted on - as well as the mount position itself - can affect the firing arc (a few ships have protrusions that can block a turret). And, as hinted at earlier, once you get in close, they can be outpaced by a fast ship, thus losing some of their effectiveness. Gimballed is a compromise between fixed and turret. It can rotate to a limited degree is help with aiming and pack a fair punch, but they are still weaker than a fixed weapon and don't have as much freedom for aiming as a turret (they can really only aim at what's in front - it just no longer has to be directly in front). The explanation for these differences can be explained away by fairly basic principles for the mount. All weapons are stored in internal compartments on the ship's hull. The concept of space being a premium for spaceships (especially for the hull) is going to hold, and adding components to be able to move a weapon is going to take up space in its compartment, and the more space a mount takes up, the less space there is for components for the weapon's output (thus smaller barrels, smaller clips, etc.). Now, in Star Wars, not that many ships store any - let alone all - of their weapons internally, and examples of internally stored weapons we have seen tend to be anti-personnel rather than anti-vehicle/ship. I argue that the aforementioned principles are at work for Star Wars as well, and from that, it makes sense that the Hammerhead would use fixed or gimballed weapons. Turrets can be placed on its flanks to help protect them somewhat, but the forward weapons would undoubtedly be the main focus, which we see in all of the different models of it.

[@cryptosporidium1375]

The Mon Cala race was committed to the rebellion before the destruction of the Death Star. They were still refitting all their MC80s with armor, shielding, and weaponry. They were not completely done mobilizing their race.

[@ArtyKibbles2190]

Star destroyers: you can’t defeat us Rebel fleet: we know, but he can Small hammerhead ship: destroys both destroys and shield

[@marleyjr00]

Ever since we saw our first Hammerhead in KOTOR I loved it. Idk why I just do.

[@TheActorMichaelParagon]

How ironic that I was in a conversation earlier about the CR-90's length and then I find it even HERE it's quoted wrong! According to the Ultimate Star Wars - New Edition: the Sphyrna-class corvette, aka Hammerhead, is 315 meters or 1033 ft long. Alan, along with the pipe-wrench pic - that's TWO STRIKES!!!

[@powerofanime1]

It may not be able to perform the venerable "Other Wedge Manouever" but a version of the Hammerhead whose prow was shaped like the Knightly Heater Shield would be able to shelter an escort behind the prow when anti-fighter ships are employed by the enemy.

[@phoenixx913]

Don't forget about the Legacy Era because the Republic went back to Hammerhead designs again during that period and had a lot of hammerhead designs.

[@justinvanvolkenburg5298]

The other Advantage: Munitions can be mount in the upper and lower blades. Having Missiles and Torpedoes (NOT BOMBS!) can be a force multiplier. In addition, extra equipment can be mounted, such as sensors and communication units. Finally, by my guess, a docking system could be mounted for emergency and salvage operations. Just for the record, I would also go for reverse thrusters to aid in maneuverability and escaping.

[@randytyson]

Great video, wasnt expecting to learn about safety or the advances in cutting cheese

[@Xetrus]

Dude. Hammerhead SHARK!

[@simonmorris4226]

Simple answer. Just like the hammerhead shark it allows its sensor arrays to be as far apart as possible giving wider coverage, better 3D capability and more accurate ranging.

[@Meravokas]

You forgot to mention that rebel refitted/purpose built corvettes (lightmaker included) had Reinforced bridge and frontal structure. While not actually intended for ramming, this increase in structural integrity is what allowed the heavy impact to not only be survivable, but allow it to continue on it's reactionary push without further damage to itself. The ram wasn't just some tactical potentially suicidal run. Also, even the Lightmaker wouldn't have been able to survive the hit that transport took. Vader's ISD was just coming out of hyperspace and the transport was moving in it's direction. Shields on the ISD were at full, A hammerhead wouldn't have fared much better.

[@vamphere4366]

0:09 HAMMER TIME *on the TV*

[@RichardAllen-sh7rx]

The Corvette size has been accidentally mentioned as 315 meters by Disney books. Glad you said it's around the correct 100meter range

[@monusbrewer4911]

Great video, nice idea, had really not thought about it. Stay safe my friend! 🙏

[@romansnell4878]

I love the hammerhead corvette design its one of my favourites from the whole star wars franchise

[@bjw4859]

Great video, dam that was detailed very informative.