I salute Dr. Peter Sanlon and his principled stand for the way the scriptures have been understood and interpreted on these divisive issues. Educated, gracious and thoughtful people such as he are cause for us to stop and ponder the seemingly inexorable tide of liberalism and permissiveness which now seems to characterise Western society, and which is now beginning to re-define denominations such as the CofE.
@ClauGutierrezY4 жыл бұрын
I live in the southwest of England, and man... biblically sound and gospel centred churches are a hard to find luxury. I really don't know what to do. Pray for me and my family please. God bless you all.
@keithrogers41703 жыл бұрын
St Leonard's church,Exeter and Trinity church,Exeter are pretty strong conservative evangelical churches.
@edmonddantes51042 жыл бұрын
I would attend a Orthodox Eastern Church and just say be done with it God Bless you and your family 🕯
@honawikeepa58132 жыл бұрын
A thoughtful consideration no doubt. Well done brother. I removed my family from an Evangelical Church in 2000 because I refused to listen to pastors telling their people to give up thinking and use more faith. I was and remain a Bible teacher to our family and others. We are inspired by men like Francis Schaeffer and Adolf schlatter and many others. God bless from New Zealand.
@lindajustin99495 жыл бұрын
No compromise. How freshing! May the Lord's grace be abundant for the days ahead. God bless you.
@Sheba_3165 жыл бұрын
Linda Justin Amen.
@briansimons94724 жыл бұрын
Let's get the kindling ready to burn the heretics!
@GailOwens3 жыл бұрын
Bless you for taking a stand for God's word and truth. God bless you .
@normafarmer3254 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this information, I am so saddened by the departure of biblical truth in the Church Of England. I am living in a small village and there is not a Free Church Of England. I am worshipping in a church on a military base. We have different chaplains, as they are usually here for three years or so. It is interdominational. If this teaching is brought I shall leave.
@brianmasters11254 жыл бұрын
I heard Martyn Lloyd Jones preach twice; he wrote two booklets on this subject, The State of The Nation and The State of The Church, highly recommended.
@SOLAplatform4 жыл бұрын
thank you Brian! I met his daughter while at Eden Baptist in Cambridge ...
@brianmasters11254 жыл бұрын
@@SOLAplatform It seems so long ago now; some of us turned up at church one Good Friday, only to find there was no service, so we jumped into a car, drove to the Elephant and Castle and went to Spurgeon's Tabernacle instead, where he was preaching, or rather, teaching. His subject was that Jesus' suffering did not end on the cross but continued for a while in Sheol.
@J_a_s_o_n Жыл бұрын
@@brianmasters1125 🙄🙄
@Ozmulki2 жыл бұрын
One of the interviewees hit it on the head. The compromise to accept current culture vs scripture cannot be accepted. God bless this church!
@robertlamontministry-austr79433 жыл бұрын
I left the Anglican Church because I was sick of the immorality, bullying, cover up and false teaching. I live in Sydney where the Anglican Church thinks it is evangelical but us far from it.
@theoutlier90532 жыл бұрын
I hear the people who say they are called to stay and I applaud them. For myself I cannot spend all of my energies fighting the very establishment that should support biblical truth. I prefer to use every second of my life to sharing the gospel with the lost and making sure that those who receive Christ are properly discipled . In all honesty I don't believe I could recommend the Church of England as a place for new Christians to be discipled.
@crissyliz4 жыл бұрын
My father resigned from the C of E in the early 1970s believing it to be an apostate church even then, accomodating, as it did and continues to do, those who deny the diety of our Lord Jesus Christ.
@davidhart77923 жыл бұрын
After watching this video, the expression Divide and Conquer comes to mind. Don't let the devil win, have faith, stick together and work together in the love of Christ.
@J_a_s_o_n Жыл бұрын
David you are a LIAR and a heathen
@TJLovering4 жыл бұрын
I thought of leaving the Church of England but the I believed that God was leading me to stay. The church is my missionary field. If all the good people leave it is a great loss for the church. Please stay and help make the C of E a place where pilgrims get spiritual help.. Anyway that is my calling. Your calling maybe different.
@pcarr13824 жыл бұрын
Good luck and God help you!
@davidhart77923 жыл бұрын
To give up is to fail.
@thediaryofaparsonageistanb22752 жыл бұрын
I whole heartedly agree. God led you with many of us to stay and not give in to division caused by liberalist tosh and reactionary sectarianism. Thank God for all the clergy that stand their ground and do not jump ship.
@Alexander-vm2ox2 жыл бұрын
They let women be reverends
@BlueOstinato2 жыл бұрын
I tried, and failed. You are simply isolated and ostracised if you try to oppose. No point in trying to administer medicine to the dead, nor is there any hope in trying to put out a house fire with a glass of water. The force of the swinging pendulum is too much. I wish you the best.
@danieltang3985 Жыл бұрын
Great video. It’s time for the diehards to stand up for the true gospel of Jesus Christ. Matthew 24 is right in front of our eyes.
@EarlEBird-fz6yr Жыл бұрын
The Free Church of England has been blessed, of this I am sure.
@GailOwens3 жыл бұрын
God bless you folks
@jimmybprince5 жыл бұрын
satan is cunning .He is trying to chip away little by little the true word of god
@davidhart77923 жыл бұрын
As a lifelong Christian I agree that the bible and gospel should not be diluted or compromised, but should be imparted to children and people that have not been brought up in a Christian family, in ways that they can understand. More ways should be found to reach these people and introduce them to Jesus, rather than preaching to the few converted every Sunday. This can't be done by leaving the church, but by getting out there and doing it. I am 72 now and from the age of 16 I have seen congregations decline and churches close in the area I was brought up in. Today's church has got to move forward in grace and address this. If the church does not reach out to children, then where does it's future lie.
@bryaneast25134 жыл бұрын
I praise God for Peter's stand. I was very unhappy with the way things were going in the Church of England. First I believed I had to stay for the benefit of some brothers and sisters in Christ and this belief I carried into retirement. But clearly it was impossible to stay in the midst of such liberalism and compromise. In January of 2019 I was invited to preach at an independent chapel and experienced what was quite a revelation of the sheer purity of the Christian faith. I now rejoice in a freedom I had not experienced before. I am now part of a small fellowship working simply for the glory of God and love of the risen Jesus.
@davidhart77923 жыл бұрын
Surely working for the glory of God means being a fisher of men.
@bibleblessingsbypastoratha42304 жыл бұрын
May the good Lord bless you ..by pastor Athanasius. i wish i could meet you
@AK-yb9fe5 жыл бұрын
Great video. Encouraging and very well done. Thank you so much.
@interqward14 жыл бұрын
I am probably not the best person for all of you to be talking with (!), or hearing from - given the types of producers, and advertising and marketing companies I have worked with in the past, and the types of work I edit now. However, as you must all surely know, the top six or seven directorates of the CIA have recently been turned over to women - real women, I should hasten to say - and 'some people in the public space' have been tasked to produce an effective vision of a female perspective of let's just say 'political and social/ideological' a media and entertainment character, in order to counter the current agenda that is referred to in the video above. By no means at all, has this subversion of churches, education, and mass media culture over the last thirty or so year been a simply accident of history, though nor is it some kind of new quietly creeping Marxist thing either - which could be fairly easily countered. You are on the right track. None of this was just an 'ideological disagreement,' nor any kind of happenstance of history. It is rooted in things quite far away from the standard 'conspiracy theories' about Communism, Freemasons, Rothschilds, Reptilians(!), Illuminati and all of that; but of course it is possible to see how groups with large social reach and ideas about education and religion are recruited to leverage power. Things will slowly come out, but for now it's as important to know you from others - independent observers - that you are reacting to a real and malicious altering of values and value systems - and which has been quite deliberate. I am such an observer who will tell you, THAT YOU ARE RIGHT.
@keithdavies6316 Жыл бұрын
Whatever happens to the church of England, they who misinterpreted the Holy Bible will themselves have to answer for whatever they add or take away to suite themselves. I'm an Anglican here in South Africa.
@johnkelly38862 жыл бұрын
The CoE is a great and enlightened cultural institution, that has shown the survivors ability to adapt. Fundamentalism in Christianity, as in Islam, is oppressive reaction to the death of a social status quo, and the beliefs that support it.
@sanityscove89175 жыл бұрын
Great video-all the best Peter.
@SOLAplatform5 жыл бұрын
thank you Peter! I'm glad we connected.
@giovannanichols68783 жыл бұрын
The Church’s one foundation is Jesus Christ her Lord; She is His new creation by water and the word; From heaven He came and sought her to be His holy bride; With His own blood He bought her, and for her life He died. Though with a scornful wonder men see her sore oppressed, By schisms rend asunder, by heresies distressed, Yet saints their watch are keeping, their cry goes up , “How long?” And soon the night of weeping shall be the morn of song!
@stevem34395 жыл бұрын
Nice, thanks!
@anselman31565 жыл бұрын
Why, at 09:58, when interviewing one priest, do you show lapel pins of another priest, showing the non-Christian occult symbol of a hexagram? I think you have made an association of that interviewee with that symbol. "Tainted by association"? You also misrepresent Anglo-Catholicism by identifying it with the "liberals" who represented themselves as such. If you would be historically accurate, you would acknowledge that the Free Church of England did NOT come about as a reaction against the "liberalism" of the men whose books you showed. It was formed much earlier as a partisan reaction of a particular kind of Protestantism hostile to some authentic Anglican doctrine and practice which they disliked because it was not Protestant enough ( although it was in continuity with those of the historic Church of England). For a true representation of the Anglo Catholic position on the Thirty Nine Articles, I recommend you read Bishop Alexander Penrose Forbes' book on the Thirty Nine Articles.
@SOLAplatform5 жыл бұрын
my friend, your observations reveal your Anglo Catholic identity. You're welcome to disagree with me but I maintain my point
@brianmasters11254 жыл бұрын
That hexagram is the symbol of the Babylonian god Remphan, and of satanic Israel.
@maireadhowie61994 жыл бұрын
For God does not change... He is the same yesterday, today and always. (Now, perhaps research into the truth about which actual day of the week is the true Sabbath... worship any day of the week is good... but what about remembering the Sabbath. Who changed the Sabbath to Sunday????... I am concerned) 💖
@tochukwunjoku4 жыл бұрын
This was an absolute joy to watch and thank you so much for sharing this amazing moment. God richly bless Rev Peter, His wife and the entire family for standing up to the truth that can never be broken!!! Btw, I became a subscriber today and I look forward to more interesting videos Many thanks and glory be to our Lord and savior Jesus Christ.
@CarlStJohn-x9w2 ай бұрын
Christ never gave the church permission to reform in the first place. Now they're 20000 reformed churches. So which one ?
@MSUTBDR5 жыл бұрын
If only the Roman Catholic Church would truly turn itself to the Bible!
@nicholasreid18364 жыл бұрын
It never has ceased to do so... except that it does not give the Bible fundamentalist interpretations.
@SoundtheTrumpet20233 жыл бұрын
How I wish that there was a Free Church of England parish in Southwest Ohio USA.
@doubtingthomas91173 жыл бұрын
Are there any ACNA parishes in your neck of the woods?
@twotetah2 жыл бұрын
Maybe there is a Reformed Episcopal Church? From my understanding they are sister denominations,...
@buckyoung45783 жыл бұрын
It is not that anyone is "leaving the Church of England". It is that the Church of England has left the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Therefore, if you are a Christian you have no choice but to leave any denomination or church that is in apostasy. The teaching of The Holy Bible are clear and not complicated addressing the value of human life from conception to natural death. Jesus Christ came to give us "Life and Life more abundantly". The Word is clear that there is only one way to Heaven. That Muslims, atheist, et al are going to Hell. This saddens us. That is why we have the Great Commission. But, churches/denominations that say there are "many ways to Heaven" HATE the lost. They hate those in sexual sin. They hate women by denying their correct place in the marriage relationship. In fact, many denominations/churches today are surrogates for the Devil.
@georgeconger47825 жыл бұрын
Well done
@wretch12 жыл бұрын
Amen amen amen!
@ThisBloke760 Жыл бұрын
Why leave? Matthew 24 Jesus told us when we see the abomination of desolation in the temple flee! Drag shows may not be THE abomination but it certainly is AN abomination.
@jonatasbragatto5 жыл бұрын
Great video, sir!
@SOLAplatform5 жыл бұрын
Thank you Jonatas!
@severianmonk73944 жыл бұрын
It would be helpful to post some videos of complete parochial services for those who have no easy geographical access to an orthodox congregation.
@davidhart77923 жыл бұрын
Seems that the young lady in the video would rather have confrontation than discussion.
@harrybendelow3537 Жыл бұрын
He would be disciplined by the real Church (Catholic) as well as the rebellious Churches.
@YourBoyJohnny945 ай бұрын
😂 Diciplined? Rome can’t even discipline those German bishops who allow same sex “marriage”
@teenherofilms4 жыл бұрын
I truly believe that his decision to leave the Church of England was the right one. Only he did not go far enough. He should have got out of organized religion altogether. Any thinking person can find his own spirituality without an organized religion with all of its creeds and dogmas.
@davidhart77923 жыл бұрын
I have a faith not a religion.
@Davidwarren-h8g6 ай бұрын
I do disagree with you! You don't give up on or abandon The C of E because of the troubling Progressive influences. Resist it!! Division is a slippery slope that will continue to divide over time until there's nothing much left....
@briansimons94724 жыл бұрын
As a poor working class lad in London, I was grateful to be part of a marvellous, loving Christian church. It introduced me to loving relationships, Biblical Studies and languages, literary analysis of texts, thinking about the big questions of life and choral music. This opened up for me a much broader experience than I had at home. Yet having studied at degree level at univetsity, I found the world opened much further. But I can no longer try to live with a first century mindset and according to a book which is rooted in the culture and thought world of two thousand years ago. My interest and fascination with the Bible and Religious Studies and the deep existential questions of life remains. But I can no longer try to live as a first century person. I am a 21st century person and any faith must be a 21st century faith. The Church trapped in the first century is not relevant or supportive or helpful to people of today like my gay son and his husband, who would never, ever go near a church. Sorry, but all this quibbling over what most would regard as jots and tittles is just irrelevant.
@pcarr13824 жыл бұрын
This sounds like you don’t like Christianity. Perhaps Unitarian Universalism or Baha’i are closer to what you’re talking about if you want a religion that cares about adapting to the times and can accommodate your interests. Otherwise: ““Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.” Matthew 5:17-18 NKJV
@pcarr13824 жыл бұрын
But you should try and reconcile these things as best you can. Maybe the first century has something timeless to offer.
@briansimons94724 жыл бұрын
@@pcarr1382 I am still very much interested in Biblical Studies and Christianity and I agree that to timeless wisdom can be found in ancient traditions. But I can no longer commit myself to being a member of the Church. I would also say that views opposing our own are often useful in assessing what we have come to believe. So my interest in religion and in Christianity especially continues.
@pcarr13824 жыл бұрын
Brian Simons While traditional Christianity is the truth and this makes me pretty sad at least you’ve reached the point of consistency and resolution. Hopefully your studies can bring you around to the path that the faithful has walked prior to the Enlightenment (and for that matter the way the rest of the world has walked too).
@Lakeslover14 жыл бұрын
Brian Simons The Truth is very plain . The word “mindset” is open to deception. Of course, mindset will be a more comfortable thing for you today, but the Truth is always the Truth however inconvenient that may be.
@anselman31565 жыл бұрын
You really ought to take a proper look at history and not make misleading statements "The Free Church of England broke away from the Church of England in the 19th century when the Anglo Catholics were welcomed into the Church and brought unfortunately some liberalism with them". The FCE website states that it was founded in response to the Anglo Catholicism of Henry Phillpotts the Bishop of Exeter. Phillpotts was in the longstanding High Church tradition. Both the High Churchmen and the Tractarians were largely cradle Anglicans, affirming the Catholic continuity of the Church of England. They could not properly be described as proponents of liberalism, nor as being a foreign group being "welcomed into the Cof E". I think you may find (and I do not have full knowledge of the Free CoE), that the Free church was more concerned to be more exclusively Calvinistic and was intolerant of High Church tradition, which was far from being "liberalism". Phillpotts himself was at one point hailed by the Low Church as being a champion of Protestantism against Romanism. Liberalism began to influence some Anglo Catholics at a later date, and this was opposed by the High Churchmen and the Tractarians, those who might be called the true Anglo Catholics. It seems very doubtful that liberalism among Anglo Catholics was the issue for the founders of the Free CoE in 1844. It may have been more sacramental doctrine?
@SOLAplatform5 жыл бұрын
Thank you "anselman". Are you not willing to write under your real name? I get your point, thank you.Do you know what these "high Church" Anglo Catholics' views were on the presence of Christ in the eucharist and justification?
@anselman31565 жыл бұрын
@@SOLAplatform From the little I have read about the current Free CoE, it appears they might not believe in real presence in the way that most Anglo Catholics do, and that they don't believe baptism always effects regeneration. High Church and Anglo Catholics believe in baptismal regeneration, and this is the doctrine of the Book of Common Prayer. The BCP wording also states that in the Communion we eat the flesh and drink the blood of our Lord Jesus Christ. Within the CoE, historically, there appear to have been various views on the eucharistic presence, influenced perhaps by Lutheranism, Calvinism and Zwinglianism. The Church only officially rejected a particular popular Roman understanding of Transubstantiation, whilst allowing for other ways of speaking of the change in the elements. There was also a "receptionist" view which held that the presence was dependent on the worthiness of the recipient. My knowledge is not extensive, but I think that some pre-Tractarian High Churchmen may have held some of the varying views, including receptionism. The Tractarian Scottish Bishop Alexander Penrose Forbes was tried for heresy because of teaching the real presence, but was exonerated. There is an interesting collection of Anglican views on the Eucharist online, called Anglican Eucharistic Theology, showing the writings of various historical figures. As for justification (again I have only limited knowledge), I think High Church views might have varied somewhat, but there were those who rejected the Lutheran idea that justification was a merely external thing and did not involve an interior change in the person. Also, the Prayer Book speaks of the faith that justifies as being a "lively faith", which might be understood as being faith active in obedience to God, as faith without works is dead. Protestants, Calvinist and Lutheran, seem to have some confusion on the matters of justification, regeneration and sanctification. Their objections to baptismal regeneration in every case of baptism seems to be due to the erroneous understanding of election and predestination, but that's another big subject. I wish you well in researching more of the history of Anglican doctrine. As I say, I am not an authority, but I think what I have said is fairly accurate. My best wishes to you.
@anselman31565 жыл бұрын
@@SOLAplatform P.S. I would again recommend Bishop Alexander Penrose Forbes' book on The Thirty Nine Articles for a thorough discussion of them.
@daviddragona18534 ай бұрын
PLEASE COME HOME TO THE FULLNESS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ⛪ YOUR SYMBOL SERVICES WILL BECOME THE EUCARIST ENOUGH REPENT NOW LISTEN TO HEART OF CHRIST HE PRAYED WE SHOULD BE ONE
@aadschram58774 жыл бұрын
Why not joining the catholic church like brave Gavin Ashenden did.
@1066ukjoseph3 жыл бұрын
A church created by a king enough said
@jackreilly44173 жыл бұрын
Yep better to follow one from a pope
@veehope27023 жыл бұрын
@@jackreilly4417 the pope is closer to God
@YourBoyJohnny945 ай бұрын
@@veehope2702The office of the Pope is Antichrist.
@raikajirai73882 жыл бұрын
Hi dear greetings from nepal
@wynandlouw62225 жыл бұрын
Is jy nou presbiterisaans?
@janwoG4 жыл бұрын
The official Church of England is not anymore Christian but Chrislamist, because they consider Allah the same god than theirs.
@patti38554 жыл бұрын
Don't try to speak against liberalisation of the RC Church, just leave it as its doctrine is entirely wrong.
@nicholasreid18364 жыл бұрын
"Answer not a fool according to his folly lest he be wise in his conceit'. It is impossible to argue against ingrained bigotry, so it is impossible to answer your comment here, unless i were to indulge in a very long argument indeed. God bless... but try to prevent your bigotry from clouding your judgement.
@scottpalmer94753 жыл бұрын
@@nicholasreid1836 That is not bigotry. You are misusing the word. The RC "Church" is infested with false doctrine like a termite-riddled plank of wood.
@nicholasreid18363 жыл бұрын
@@scottpalmer9475 Dear Troll - as I said correctly , one cannot argue against ingrained bigotry. Think carefully. In the largely secular society in which we now life, ANY Christian doctrine is likely to be labelled as "infested with false doctrine like a termite-riddled plank of wood", because more of society now rejects ALL Christian teaching, Catholic, Protestant, Eastern Orthodox etc. I beg you not to resort to saying that your version of Christianity is somehow more "authentic" than Catholic Christianity. If so, you are likely to go down the shaky fundamentalist path ("we hold only to the Bible" etc.) ignoring the fact that the New testament itself grew out of diverse doctrines..PS I have never heard of a bigot who admits to his bigotry. He always asumes that he is speaking the plain truth.
@Chris_Sheridan Жыл бұрын
@@nicholasreid1836 .. indeed! Try looking at yourself in a mirror - that's your problem.
@nicholasreid1836 Жыл бұрын
@@Chris_Sheridan Sorry Chris, but a flippant one-liner doesn't respond to the issues I raised. Intelligent arguments can't be nullified by mere insult.
@dodibenabba13782 жыл бұрын
Because it's roots are completely pagan and it teaches a false Messiah with it's replacement theology?? 🤔
@christophertucker80314 жыл бұрын
These people denied the authority of the Fathers of the early church. People with a physical connection to Jesus like all protestants. They started their own churches and shattered the church into 1000s of pieces. Against the will of God.
@sabaghebreghzabhier33824 жыл бұрын
They should join Catholic Church , are they following God or Gay?
@PInk77W13 жыл бұрын
Jesus started one church and said it would last forever The Roman Catholic Church
@NhwNews3 жыл бұрын
Really?
@PInk77W13 жыл бұрын
@@NhwNews Popes 1 Peter (33-67) 2 Linus 3 Cletus 4 Clement 5 Evaristus 6 Alexander 7 Sixtus 8 Telephonus 9 Hyginus 10 Pius 11 Aincetus 12 Soter 13 Eleutherius (175-189) 14 Victor (189-199) 15 Zephyrinus (199-217) 16 Callistus (217-222) 17 Urban l (222-230) 18 Pontian (230-235) 19 Anterus (235-236) 20 Fabian (236-250) 21 Cornelius (251-253) 22 Lucius l (253-254) 23 Stephen (254-257) 24 Sixtus ll (257-258) 25 Dionysius (258-268) 26 Felix (268-274) 27 Eutychain (274-283) 28 Caius (283-296) 29 Marcellinus (296-304) 30 Marcellus (304-309) 31 Eusebius (309) 32 Miltiades (311-314) 33 Sylvester (314-335) 34 Mark (336) 35 Julius (336-352) 36 Liberius (352-366) 37 Damasus (366-384) 38 Siricius (384-399) 39 Anastasius (399-401) 40 Innocent (401-417) 41 Zosimus (417-418) 42 Boniface (418-422) 43 Celestine (422-432) 44 Sixtus ll (432-440) 45 Leo (440-461) 46 Hilarus (461-468) 47 Simplicius (468-483) 48 Felix ll (483-492) 49 Gelasius (492-496) 50 Anastasius ll (496-498) 51 Stymmachus (498-514) 52 Hormisdas (514-523) 53 John (523-526) 54 Felix lV (526-530) 55 Boniface ll (530-532) 56 John ll (532-535) 57 Agapitus (535-536) 58 Silverius (536-537) 59 Vigilius (537-555) 60 Pelagius (555-561) 61 John lll (561-574) 62 Benedict (574-579) 63 Pelagius (579-590) 64 St. Gregory (590-604) 65 Sabinian (604-606) 66 Boniface lll (607) 67 St Boniface lV (607-615) 68 Adeodatus (615-618) 69 Boniface V (618-625) 70 Honorius (625-638) 71 Severinus (640) 72 John lV (640-642) 73 Theodore (642-649) 74 St Martin (649-655) 75 St Eugene (655-657) 76 St Vitalian (657-672) 77 Adeodatus (672-676) 78 Donus (676-678) 79 Agatho (678-681) 80 St Leo ll (681-683) 81 St. Benedict ll (683-685) 82 John V (685-686) 83 Conon (686-687) 84 St Sergius (687-701) 85 John Vl (701-705) 86 John Vll (705-707) 87 Sissinius (708) 88 Constantine (708-715) 89 St Gregory ll (715-731) 90 St. Gregory lll (731-741) 91 St Zacharius (741-752) 92 Stephen ll (752-757) 93 St. Paul (757-767) 94 St. Stephen lll (767-772) 95 Hadrian (772-795) 96 St. Leo lll (795-816) 97 Stephen lV (816-817) 98 St. Paschal (817-824) 99 Eugene ll (824-827) 100 Valentine (827) 101 Gregory lV (827-844) 102 Sergius ll (844-847) 103 St. Leo lV (847-855) 104 Benedict lll (855-858) 105 St. Nicholas (858-867) 106 Hadrian ll (867-872) 107 John Vlll (872-882) 108 Marinus (882-884) 109 St Hadrian lll (884-885) 110 Stephen V (885-891) 111 Formosus (891-896) 112 Boniface Vl (896) 113 Stephen Vl (897) 114 Romanus (897) 115 Theodore ll (897) 116 John lX (897-900) 117 Benedict lV (900-903) 118 Leo V (903) 119 Sergius lll (904-911) 120 Anastasius lll (911-913) 121 Lando (913-914) 122 John X (914-928) 123 Leo Vl (928) 124 Stephen (928-931) 125 John Xl (931-935) 126 Leo Vll (936-939) 127 Stephen Vlll (939-942) 128 Marinus ll (942-946) 129 Agapitus ll (946-955) 130 John Xll (955-964) 131 Leo Vlll (964-965) 132 Benedict V (965-966) 133 John Xlll (966-972) 134 Benedict Vl (972-974) 135 Benedict Vll (974-983) 136 John XlV (983-984) 137 John XV (984-996) 138 Gregory V (996-999) 139 Sylvester ll (999-1003) 140 John XVll (1003) 141 John XVlll (1003-1009) 142 Sergius lV (1009-1012) 143 Benedict Vlll (1012-1024) 144 John XlX (1024-1032) 145 Benedict lX 1032-1044) 146 Sylvester lll (1045) 147 Benedict lX (1045) 148 Gregory Vl (1045-1046) 149 Clement ll (1046-1047) 150 Benedict lX (1047-1048) 151 Damasus ll (1048) 152 St. Leo lX (1048-1054) 153 Victor ll (1054-1057) 154 Stephen lX. (1057-1058) 155 Nicholas ll (1058-1061) 156 Alexander ll (1061-1073) 157 Gregory Vll (1073-1085) 158 Bl Victor lll (1085-1087) 159 Bl. Urban ll (1087-1099) 160 Paschal ll (1099-1118) 161 Gelasius ll (1118-1119) 162 Callistus (1119-1124) 163 Honorus ll (1124-1130) 164 Innocent ll (1130-1143) 165 Celestine ll (1143-1144) 166 Lucius ll (1144-1145) 167 Bl. Eugene lll (1145-1153) 168 Anastasius lV (1153-1154) 169 Hadrian lV (1154-1159) 170 Alexander lll (1159-1181) 171 Lucius lll (1181-1185) 172 Urban lll (1185-1187) 173 Gregory Vlll (1187) 174 Clement lll (1187-1191) 175 Celestine lll (1191-1198) 176 Innocent lll (1198-1216) 177 Honorius lll (1216-1227) 178 Gregory lX (1227-1241) 179 Celestine lV (1241) 180 Innocent lV (1241-1254) 181 Alexander lV (1254-1261) 182 Urban lV (1261-1264) 183 Clement IV (1264-1268) 184 Bl Gregory X (1268-1276) 185 Bl. Innocent V (1276) 186 Hadrian V (1276) 187 John XXl 1276-1277) 188 Nicholas lll (1277-1280) 189 Martin lV (1280-1285) 190 Honorius lV (1285-1287) 191 Nicholas IV (1287-1292) 192 St. Celestine V (1292-1294) 193 Boniface Vlll (1294-1303) 194 Bl. Benedict Xl (1303-1304) 195 Clement V (1304-1314) 196 John XXll (1314-1334) 197 Benedict Xll (1334-1342) 198 Clement Vl (1342-1352) 199 Innocent Vl (1352-1362) 200 Bl Urban V (1362-1370) 201 Gregory Xl (1370-1378) 202 Urban Vl (1378-1389) 203 Boniface lX (1389-1404) 204 Innocent Vll (1404-1406) 205 Gregory Xll (1406-1415) 206 Martin V (1415-1431) 207 Eugene lV (1431-1447) 208 Nicholas V (1447-1455) 209 Calixtus lll (1455-1458) 210 Pius (1458-1464) 211 Pius ll (1464-1471) 212 Sixtus lV 1471-1484) 213 Innocent Vlll (1484-1492) 214 Alexander Vl (1492-1503) 215 Pius lll (1503) 216 Julius ll (1503-1513) 217 Leo X (1513-1521) 218 Hadrian Vl (1521-1523) 219 Clement Vll (1523-1534) 220 Paul lll (1534-1549) 221 Julius lll (1549-1555) 222 Marcellus ll (1555) 223 Paul lV (1555-1559) 224 Paul lV (1559-1565) 225 St Pius V (1565-1572) 226 Gregory Xlll (1572-1585) 227 Sixtus V (1585-1590) 228 Urban Vll (1590) 229 Gregory XlV (1590-1591) 230 Innocent lX (1591) 231 Clement Vlll (1591-1605) 232 Leo Xl (1605) 233 Paul V (1605-1621) 234 Gregory XV (1621-1623) 235 Urban Vlll (1623-1644) 236 Innocent X (1644-1655) 237 Alexander Vll (1655-1667) 238 Clement lX (1667-1669) 239 Clement X (1669-1676) 240 Bl. Innocent Xl (1676-1689) 241 Alexander Vlll (1689-1691) 242 Innocent Xll (1691-1700) 243 Clement Xl (1700-1721) 244 Innocent Xlll (1721-1724) 245 Benedict Xlll (1724-1730) 246 Clement Xll (1730-1740) 247 Benedict XlV (1740-1758) 248 Clement Xlll (1758-1769) 249 Clement XlV (1769-1774) 250 Pius Vl (1774-1799) 251 Pius Vll (1799-1823) 252 Leo Xll (1823-1829) 253 Pius Vlll (1829-1830) 254 Gregory XVl (1831-1846) 255 Pius lX (1846-1878) 256 Leo Xlll (1878-1903) 257 St. Pius X (1903-1914) 258 Benedict XV (1914-1922) 259 Pius Xl (1922-1939) 260 Pius Xll (1939-1958) 261 St. John XXlll (1958-1963) 262 Paul Vl (1963-1978) 263 John Paul (1978) 264 John Paul ll (1978-2005) 265 Benedict XVl (2005-2013) 266 Francis 2013-
@seansweeney89112 жыл бұрын
Jesus did not found the Catholic Church and even if he did it wouldn’t matter, as it has long since been corrupted and teaches various doctrines totally contrary to the contents of the Bible
@PInk77W12 жыл бұрын
@@seansweeney8911 Jesus founded the Catholic Church And He said “The gates of hades WILL NOT PREVAIL against it” Mt 16 You Fail
@seansweeney89112 жыл бұрын
@@PInk77W1 Jesus meant the universal Christian church, but he acknowledged that various false elements would rise within, Romanism for instance
@lynneivison57734 жыл бұрын
Is is very easy to convert to Catholicism - speak to your local priest - it is the true Church of England which is based on the insane Henry 8
@hreader4 жыл бұрын
I'm afraid that a lot of the attitudes displayed here are perfect examples of I find most repellant about religion - any religion (yes, some Moslems and some of the Jewish faith also). It's the arrogant certainties that in the past led to appalling religion - based persecutions and in the present make life miserable for those not of the stnadard sexuality in almost all the Middle East and in many countries in Africa. And which also try to hobble scientific advance in the USA, in Turkey and in many other regions where religion interferes in politics. Religion needs to show some humility and give due credit to those aspects of modernism that are humane and liberating, which for instance allow those on the LGBTQ+ spectrum to come out into the open. You can surely live the Gospel without continuing in the spirit of the persecutors we thought consigned to history. Holy Book literalism is the curse of ALL religions!
@ritawing10644 жыл бұрын
Indeed, you are right. It is especially shameful how preachers who should know better continue to neglect modern biblical and archeological research in their teaching, willfully continuing to keep the laity in ignorance of real learning.
@6williamson4 жыл бұрын
I am confused by these remarks. You quote a group speaking of the 'foolishness and powerlessness" of the gospel (12:40) as leading inquisitions? You highlight the importance of moral relativism and then the importance of science that is predicated on the presumption of a single truth? I obviously don't know you but you seem very angry at the world? We certainly wish you the best and hope that you can continue a search for the truth. Peace
@KeithScott-zy5fn Жыл бұрын
Ii
@sidneymorris22543 жыл бұрын
Bash the Bishop
@magatism4 жыл бұрын
Don't leave, reclaim.
@davidhart77923 жыл бұрын
Don't leave move forward in Christ.
@joyfulpreterist75324 жыл бұрын
Start by getting rid of those "old covenant" gowns. Under the new covenant, which we are under, all believers are priests. Do you really think that Jesus, Paul, Pete re John etc. wore those "religious" gowns. Watch a you tube video of Dick Reuben (a messianic Christian) who preaches on the priestly gowns and learn what they represent. Christians are all equal and don't need "pride"
@Lloyd.B.4 жыл бұрын
Amen! Can't stand that stuff - it's so pompous.
@davidhart77923 жыл бұрын
I agree, never understood the need for ornate clothing. I don't think Jesus had need for them.
@holamigente29404 жыл бұрын
How about you read the Holy Bible?!
@jen80634 жыл бұрын
Wat is jou naam meneer?
@doreenvandermerwe20273 жыл бұрын
I don't think anybody understood Afrikaans. Wat dink jy?
@curiouscitizen36244 жыл бұрын
what a joke
@sabaghebreghzabhier33824 жыл бұрын
You guys should follow the Church founded by Jesus Christ which is a Catholic Church. Don’t invented Churches by Peter or Calvin. The Church of England is founded by a denominations. You guys are very happy for division instead of unity
@Chris_Sheridan Жыл бұрын
@sabaghebreghzabhier .. the Catholic Church has some very liberal and corrupt priests that the Vatican just moved around from place to place where they continued the largest scale of child abuse ever found with the Pope's blessing. Spotlight kzbin.info/www/bejne/e6jHdHyml7mBa8k
@Lloyd.B.4 жыл бұрын
Still wearing the silly garb I see - give it up...