The Irish for the word "forever" is "go deo". Beckett was Irish, loved languages and plays on words, so rather than waiting for God that people assume, it's more likely the play is "waiting forever" which is exactly what the characters do..
@janehowlett51583 жыл бұрын
Wow
@TeaDrinkingDragon3 жыл бұрын
woah
@51Dss3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant revelation into the dynamic that drives the 2 characters into their circular dialog - and could it be that Vladimir and Estragon and the story teller are a metaphorical holy trinity. 3 characters in one person. A single person (the story teller) desperately trying to plumb the depths of that which is unavailable to the mortal man - "eternity" which is to say God. It also strikes me that the name Estragon is very suggestive of the female hormone estrogen. So Vladimir might well be the masculine voice always coming up with practical sounding things to do while waiting and Estrogon is fretting about what to do next - the feminine aspect of a single consciousness.
@welshpete122 жыл бұрын
Interesting , thank you for posting !
@bitoffbalance40212 жыл бұрын
@@51Dss why do you try to find meaning in this play? It was written with no particular intention , just enjoy it and let it go
@Diana8Matienzo6 жыл бұрын
*watches video* Maybe I should re-read this! *she does not move*
@PetrMichalec5 жыл бұрын
Same here :'DD
@wtfhowbizarre19465 жыл бұрын
Already read it. The Pet Shop Boys mention Waiting for Godot in their song Red Letter Day.
Hats are the only thing you can be sure of in life.
@QQTrick1QQ6 жыл бұрын
Death and taxes
@paddleduck53286 жыл бұрын
Two things 😁
@Alexandra-ip2by6 жыл бұрын
i aggree
@Endothermia6 жыл бұрын
What is this, TF2?
@seymournerds3426 жыл бұрын
Maybe by hat he means their consciousness
@felipee46226 жыл бұрын
Could you do a ‘why you should read’ playlist? Please
@johnsailorsgoat6 жыл бұрын
They already have one.
@felipee46226 жыл бұрын
@@johnsailorsgoat Could you send me link?
@TEDEd6 жыл бұрын
Here you go, Felipe E: kzbin.info/www/bejne/apXRaId7n9OVhrs
@1996Pinocchio6 жыл бұрын
@Blackbone Yes, why?
@professionalprocrastinator_.6 жыл бұрын
@Blackbone Actually its their playlist on 'why you should read...' topic. No one is telling you to read the playlist.
@mariapazgonzalezlesme6 жыл бұрын
We are all like Estragon and Vladimir, we are waiting for something / someone to find meaning in our everyday life. Hoping for Godot to give us an answer ( or an allegory to God. )
@ADEehrh6 жыл бұрын
in another 3-4 billion years I would love to be able to ask those still looking at the sky waiting; "Anything yet?"
@1996Pinocchio6 жыл бұрын
One should not forget that Estragon and Vladimir are only Persons, not real Human beings. Their only purpose is to exist, it doesn't matter what they do, they can fill a theater.
@1000OtherFoxes6 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately i think less and less people are searching for meaning, purpose or rational thinking...I'm under the impression that i see more and more people wanting to be entertained, scrolling endless meaningless content just to be distracted from ... (fill in the blank) they don't want to search for things they want answers to things, not even knowing or questioning why they believe what they believe leading to less and less constructive debates or ideas.... Just my opinion.
@mariapazgonzalezlesme6 жыл бұрын
@@ADEehrh The reply will probably like the same or slightly changed over time.
@mariapazgonzalezlesme6 жыл бұрын
@@1000OtherFoxes Sadly, that's the thing with humankind. We are ephimereal. Perhaps the weight of mortality and that our existence is, in many senses, unique yet easily repleceable; has took a toll on us.
@bkg54944 жыл бұрын
wrote a term paper on this play, essentially my take was: human action is irrelevant (“they do not move”), just as effective communication is irrelevant (E and V constantly repeat themselves and each other without ever being on the same page), and lastly socioeconomic status is irrelevant (Pozzo’s need for adulation), because the only thing worth living for is human connection. Without each other, E and V would have nothing left and no reason to continue waiting, nothing to “live” for.
@marghe21164 жыл бұрын
What an interesting take! I never thought of that
@gcvrsa3 жыл бұрын
It's certainly important to read "Waiting for Godot", but it is far more important to see it performed. It is, after all, a play, and it is meant to be experienced as a live theatre performance.
@godisdeadandwememedhim41742 жыл бұрын
I read a lot of Becket and yes, performed is a lot more catchy and funny. The physical gags works only in that way.
@rachel98762 жыл бұрын
Is there any recorded version?
@bhaskarbrahma82542 жыл бұрын
@@rachel9876 There is a movie on the play, you can watch it if you feel like to.
@UncleVegetable4 ай бұрын
I’ve seen it three times, before the box set of DVDs was released.
@iknig12 жыл бұрын
I once saw this play acted in a theatre in Melbourne by two actors in their seventies, who had both played the characters before in a play together in their youth at University. Absolutely magical to see them having lived out these lines together over decades.
@neoir85146 жыл бұрын
Godot is that one douchbag friend that always flakes at the last minute and doesn’t tell you
@archaicfalcon48986 жыл бұрын
Inglorious Basterd He is also the coffee enthusiast who magically summons a cup of coffee every single trial.
@forestvvoods5772 жыл бұрын
😭😭 this sounds personal
@godisdeadandwememedhim41742 жыл бұрын
Probably this interpretation is the most accurate one.
@Max-bo3di5 жыл бұрын
Two men are waiting, when they got tired of waiting , they decided to wait some more. The End.
@zodix445 жыл бұрын
Lol. Thats really the whole play
@jorisvandenhoek62515 жыл бұрын
@@zodix44 yeah kinda, exept for dem two other dudes that show up
@buddhistsympathizer11364 жыл бұрын
To fill the time while waiting, they post comments on KZbin videos
@indrajeetpatel50584 жыл бұрын
two men both had suicidal tendency invented a imagery character to avoid suicide.
@ximenazea5244 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@istalkghosts4974 жыл бұрын
I just love how the message given here in this play. The sad state of human existence, the waiting process, waiting for life to be given a meaning by something or someone. And this play is relevant even now. Just look at what is happening around us. We are all waiting for this lockdown to be over with. We are all waiting for life to return to normal.
@karansmittal6 жыл бұрын
Always the best animation for Educational content no one can beat it
@paulatreides32146 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure Kurzgesagt could, at the very least, rival it.
@issacramsey79916 жыл бұрын
Damn sure kurzgesagt could beat it or rival it
@adkakociskova63275 жыл бұрын
And the school of life
@filurenerik16432 жыл бұрын
@@paulatreides3214 They only have one artstyle. Ted-ed has so many, which is why I consider them superior animation-wise.
@parn21606 жыл бұрын
I can relate to this story so much on a personal level. How the two characters are waiting for an imaginary character to show them the way, give some sign.. I'm doing the same. I'm waiting for something miraculous to get me out of this viciousness in my life and I know there's no point and there'd be no sign, no change, but I'm still waiting. I don't know for what exactly.
@Acetaminophen696 жыл бұрын
For death
@parn21606 жыл бұрын
@@Acetaminophen69 maybe.. yeah.
@Suberi9096 жыл бұрын
Yh, it seems that life in itself does not give a real purpose. When we look at science, the answers what we get to these kinds of questions are that we are just a product of chance, there is no excuse for our existance and at the end we will die. Every morning we will wake up, have our morning routines and jump to our vicious cycle and repeat it day after day. However, I think we do have a meaning for our life. I do believe that the Godot we are waiting for is the God himself, since He is our maker. I think there are many good arguments why God does exist but it would seem that the best argument is how the world is seen without the existance of God. It is the choice that takes us apart of our very purpose. I said that I believe that God exists. I also believe, that 2000 years ago He came on earth in the form of Jesus Christ. He lived a perfect life and died for us on the cross. After this, Jesus was resurrected and all who believe this and accept Him as their God will have a personal relationship with Him and be resurrected as well, when He comes back. Since it would seem we do not have a purpose without God, I strongly encourage you to give Him a chance. If there is no God, there is no backfire for believing in Him. However, if there is God, there is an eternity to gain. Without God, we are trapped in this endless vicious cycle of agony and the only cure for it is death. But if God is with us, He will stand with us when we have tough time. The choice is yours.
@speedy012476 жыл бұрын
I don't believe in god, but if I did I find that he also has no purpose, after all if we have a purpose in god, what does he have a purpose for? If it is for us then why should we have a purpose for him after all he created us therefore we could do the same and find purpose in that which we create, if he has a purpose that is not us, then what is that purpose and why should we care if it does not relate to us? (I need to state that I am an agnostic and can't believe in any current form of god as written in the major religions due to skepticism and the unreal nature of those religions, its not like I have not read the bible, but rather the act of having read it which tore my Christianity away from me) Words only have meaning if you can believe what is written and the meaning comes not from the words so much as it does from your understanding of the words. I find this true about most everything in life, if you want it to have meaning you can give it meaning, but if you don't it won't, of course that meaning must be something you support or else it will still feel worthless.
@paulryan21286 жыл бұрын
@@Suberi909 you believe & you think a lotta stuff...
@sonalithakur49706 жыл бұрын
Half of the things you've read in school and never paid attention, turn out to be pretty interesting when it is taught by TedEd.
@briantw4 жыл бұрын
Such as finishing sentences?
@christopherfernandes44014 жыл бұрын
You are correct. We had to study this play in Catholic school for religion class at Neil McNeil High School in Toronto. The priest teaching this course was from Ireland. His interpretation of the play went above the intelligence of most of the class. But now almost 50 years later, I have come to a new understanding of this play. Sometimes we do not have an understanding of life experiences to comprehend this play at the time it is being taught.
@aarone17773 жыл бұрын
Nearly everything I learned in school was either taught in the most boring way possible; or very incomplete. I have learned soooo much more after my school years that I want to build a time machine go back and slap the L out of at least 3 of my "teachers"!
@CK_Godoth3 жыл бұрын
@@christopherfernandes4401 Oh could you please sum up what your priest/teacher taught? I'd be interested to know!
@christopherfernandes44013 жыл бұрын
@@CK_Godoth : This play ( Waiting for Godot) by S Becket was taught by Fr John Geary at Neil McNeil High School in Toronto. Fr. Geary had many interpretations on the play ‘Waiting for Godot’. Some of his explanations were, at that time I was in high school, above my level of understanding. He talked about the play from a religious view point; the people have had the clergy “think" for them, and the clergy respond by spouting nonsensical phrases that the people cannot understand, but accept. Christ the Messiah has come and yet people are still waiting for the Messiah. Another interpretations he talked about was from the point of a Freudian analyst, where the two characters represent the ID and the Ego. Still another interpretation was from the point of Jungian analyst which was way above our heads. He discussed this play in greater detail than anyone in the class wanted.
@ivanaceran6 жыл бұрын
“What do we do now, now that we are happy?”. Amazing work.
@lillysnet93454 жыл бұрын
In peace prosperity... In war victory.
@castle91656 жыл бұрын
The animation is beautiful, just beautiful.
@drewwon3 жыл бұрын
Take a minute to appreciate how good the animation of these videos are. Makes the experience so pleasant to learn about
@toaryangupta6 жыл бұрын
The best theatre keeps us thinking and waiting...
@royall555 жыл бұрын
Shall we take a moment to appreciate the narrator. He is a true rhetorician. His name is Jack Cutmore-Scott.
@Thejampacker5 жыл бұрын
royall55 didn’t appreciate the cockney accent though
@briantw4 жыл бұрын
The narrator* is pretentious.
@AndrewEdwardBailey4 жыл бұрын
Brian Tristam Williams The narrator narrates. There is no opportunity for pretence.
@createone1004 жыл бұрын
Jack Holland Good God man! If you imagine he has a cockney accent, you are likely aimlessly waiting for enlightenment too! You must get out more.
@michaelwertzy98083 жыл бұрын
@@griffinslack741, That's what she said! (I just thought of this). No, really!! Or not?
@norie2436 Жыл бұрын
I’ll never forget when I first heard these lines during an analysis of the play. “Waiting for Godot is not about Godot. Waiting for Godot is about waiting.”
@davideaston6944 Жыл бұрын
If Godot wasn't (didn't "be"), to be waited for, then there would be no reason to be waiting (which would negate the waiting being what the play is about); the play is (HAS TO BE) about Godot. To misinterpret that is to misinterpret the entire point of the sentiment. Allegorically, it would be like proposing an atheist sits waiting for God, when the atheist has already accepted the non-existence of God. They simply wouldn't bother.
@norie2436 Жыл бұрын
@@davideaston6944 When you say interpretation, there is no ‘one’ interpretation for the play and there are no rights or wrongs when we talk about interpretations. In literature, the meanings are never set in stone so I don’t entirely agree with you using the term ‘misinterpretation.’ Beckett based Godot on a letter he received from someone of the same name saying ‘I’m sorry to have kept you waiting.’ When asked about Godot, he said he regretted calling the character Godot because it had given rise to so many religious theories. And that if he had meant God by Godot, he would have said God, not Godot. Additionally, the example you gave is the one people denote to Godot the most. A more diversifying interpretation thus is to think Godot stands for all of the things we want an explanation from. And all the things that never arrive. And while yes, the waiting would not be there without the Godot to be waited for, the waiting is a constant and Godot, a variable. The waiting is what everyone can relate to.
@davideaston6944 Жыл бұрын
@@norie2436 Sorry, but I'll have to 100% disagree with you, from you beginning premise, that "there are no rights or wrongs when we talk about interpretations. In literature, the meanings are never set in stone"; I stand in the camp of "if it wasn't MEANT to mean ?something?, don't write (paint / sing / pick your art) it." Beckett, I trust, was NOT the artist that said, "It's means what YOU think it means"; I will give him FAR MORE credit than that. If you think he was that ethereal, that narrow in mind, then, I can't help you. Paraphrasing Chekov, 'The gun better be there for an eventual reason'. EVERY WORD Beckett wrote, I will contend, meant EXACTLY ?something?, and so there ultimately IS a "right or wrong". This isn't to say people can and do or might have different interpretations of ?any? art. But they'll as equally be "wrong", if they're not the correct interpretations. What a weak argument it is for either an artist or their audience to suggest that, "It means what it means to you!". Nope, not buying it, and never have, Cheers!
@norie2436 Жыл бұрын
@@davideaston6944 And voila, as I said before, ‘a work of art’ is open to many interpretations, it really is okay if you don’t buy this or agree with it. Peace.
@davideaston6944 Жыл бұрын
@@norie2436 Well, to be clear (as I thought I said before), you'd be wrong. It's your wording that makes it wrong, perhaps not your sentiment... ??? Any properly designed piece of art could be interpreted many ways, yes; but they would all be looking on closed doors. The only door "open" is the intent created by the artist. Cheers!
@wshkspr16 жыл бұрын
I've directed it and performed the role of Lucky. Both times the complexity and simplicity of the work was nearly paralyzing. It is beautifully composed, with an almost zen-like poetry in simple phrasings. A revolution of thought, it changed the face of modern drama and is without question is the most influential play of the twentieth century and relevant for any other time. "Oedipus," "Hamlet," and "Godot," they are the immortals.
@Mazidox6 жыл бұрын
Probably my favorite play to date. Every time I come back to it, I seem to find meanings in new ways. Highly recommend it.
@nadeensaleem56 жыл бұрын
Definitely one of my favorites. The most profound play I’ve ever encountered.
@khadijahtariq74376 жыл бұрын
This made me strangely anxious...
@footage64025 жыл бұрын
Ohshit same
@lazypops31174 жыл бұрын
that's the bloody problem with existentialists..
@marunomi6 жыл бұрын
The only time a lawyer can cry is when it's all over.
@Ssure26 жыл бұрын
"In my world, the colour red doesn't exist. These must be... my tears."
@hahalord72946 жыл бұрын
Was waiting for this
@s.l.34636 жыл бұрын
@Azur0 Welp, I guess we are all waiting for Godot.
@youinanalternateuniverse6 жыл бұрын
I was waiting for someone to bring him up!
@archaicfalcon48986 жыл бұрын
"I saved my 17th cup of coffee just for you."
@thegunnerclub54776 жыл бұрын
Perfect narration Loved it
@quahntasy6 жыл бұрын
I will definitely consider reading this now. And can you make a 'why you should read' Playlist?
@TEDEd6 жыл бұрын
Hi! We actually have one already. Here you go: kzbin.info/www/bejne/apXRaId7n9OVhrs
@millicentwamuru3144 жыл бұрын
@@TEDEd can you make one on "a picture of Dorian Gray"
@armandomartinez89573 жыл бұрын
I find it strange how, when talking about plays, many people would say “why you should read Hamlet.” One should encourage others to SEE Hamlet, or in this case, Godot. They were written for the stage and are best appreciated that way.
@valley_robot3 жыл бұрын
I've read and enjoyed "as you like it * as a play, as a performance by modern actors I find it annoying, reading the original play gives you the ability to make the players yourself inside your own head, modern luvvies reading this play do it no justice in my opinion. It's incredibly funny but I never saw that in watching the play performed by modern actors
@JohnSmith-qs5fg3 жыл бұрын
Young Monk: “Do not try and bend the spoon-that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth.” Neo: “What truth?” Young Monk: “There is no spoon.”
@safaeelamrani24976 жыл бұрын
Good job we're waiting for more ❤
@marvinchoudhary11166 жыл бұрын
This was byfar the most comprehensive explanation of this play ...if that is even posible .... a must read .. love to have more of these
@vm31756 жыл бұрын
There was a theater organization in my university that performed a play that had a similiar plot of Waiting for Godot, instead of waiting for Godot, it was a group of people that were waiting for a bus. The bus was supposed to take them somewhere but it broke down, then a bus authority will come and go and promise the group that the bus will be fixed the next day. As they were waiting, they were contemplating if they should just walk to their destination or wait for the bus. In end, only a few people waited and most of them walked to their destination. The director told the audience it is up to us how we interpret the play.
@wiggax79663 жыл бұрын
that is actually interesting play😲
@Woodman-Spare-that-tree Жыл бұрын
Cop out.
@greenhat36675 жыл бұрын
Video: Estragon Me: *eStRoGeN*
@Bill-fe1nb6 жыл бұрын
Do,The little prince.
@Katy0205 жыл бұрын
Bill cipher! Weird seeing you here
@ACAB.forcutie3 жыл бұрын
I volunteered as an usher at my local theater and they put this on. I watched it so many times and loved it every single time
@lorettap.9255 жыл бұрын
I had discovered Tom Stoppard's "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead" in high school and had fallen in love with it, and when we learned about "Waiting for Godot", I got really excited, because it sounded exactly like Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Then I read that part in our textbook, and it turned out that this play was indeed an inspiration for Tom Stoppard.
@raphs-place6 жыл бұрын
Beautiful visualisation and analysis of the plays history. You truly did it justice. It's one of my favourite plays of all time, and I thank you for continuing its legacy.
@Cielo200236 жыл бұрын
Godot is drinking coffee, he will arrive in a few minutes...
@vibecheck21326 жыл бұрын
Kevin Eduardo So MANY REFENREECES EEFUCK YES
@sethleoric25986 жыл бұрын
A: hey man see you by [very specific location] b: okay see u in a bit bruv [Many hours later] b: siiip.... i think i was gonna do something
@Darcyyyyyyyyyyy6 жыл бұрын
Kevin Eduardo untill then you should just keep waiting ;)
@adriatical90166 жыл бұрын
is this a reference from the book?
@Freddos115 жыл бұрын
@@adriatical9016 Maybe, or maybe from Ace Attorney: Trials & Tribulations :p
@ieatgremlins4 жыл бұрын
The animation in these videos are always great but this one is particularly remarkable.
@mystery13176 жыл бұрын
Haven’t read ‘Waiting For Godot’ but I read ‘Endgame’ (also by Beckett) and enjoyed it a lot! Many of the elements pointed out in this video are also present in ‘Endgame’ such as the circular narrative and the characters saying they’ll do things and then doing nothing at all. I recommend it!
@TGears3146 жыл бұрын
I saw this play years ago and I’m still trying to figure it out. This video only served to make it make more sense, so much so its more confusing than before. I love it
@sophieroll6 жыл бұрын
I love this play! Short and brilliant :)
@superwonder6411 Жыл бұрын
Waiting for Godot is my favourite play of all time. I have performed, watched, directed and designed for this show more times than any other performance I've ever done.
@RenderingUser4 жыл бұрын
me: waits for godot 4.0 to be released
@MewPurPur3 жыл бұрын
Waiting 4 Godot
@btsbiot13403 жыл бұрын
Me too
@pvvineet17223 жыл бұрын
@@MewPurPur deserves lot more likes
@dramaaaltadros29416 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your extremely amazing videos and book recommendations. Keep making videos about such amazing unpopular books.
@jnbfilm563 жыл бұрын
I just finished reading it. Wish I can see it being played some day. I thought it was funny, weird and strangely profound. I like how it has lots meaning without being preachy or filled with motifs. I recommend it
@danaputera719711 ай бұрын
As a wise man once said, "Good things might come to those who wait, but not for those who wait too late."
@RABIET1006 жыл бұрын
He won't arrive, he's too busy drinking his coffee cup #71
@RemyWillard6 жыл бұрын
Dyslexia with the number? ...or is he already on his third cup of his fifth trial?
@sid98geek6 жыл бұрын
Lol
@tedium373 жыл бұрын
I gathered just enough to justify never feeling the need to see this. Thank you
@rachell17946 жыл бұрын
I've been a bit skeptical about "Waiting for Godot," and while I'm happy with the points made in this video, I think I would enjoy it as a performance more so than reading it.
@eddietucker33344 жыл бұрын
I have been thinking for years about directing an absurdist play for my local 99-seater. I'm considering "Oh Dad Poor Dad..." and "The Physicists" and after watching this wonderful video, "Wiating for Godot."
@caney38246 жыл бұрын
We read it at school. A great play!
@johnsailorsgoat6 жыл бұрын
*play
@caney38246 жыл бұрын
@@johnsailorsgoat yes, thank you. You're right. It's been a while .. ^^
@michaeljohnangel63595 жыл бұрын
No. Romeo and Juliet is a great play. Becket is a great play. The Clouds is a great play. Waiting for Godot is for little children. It makes an obvious point, and takes two hours to do it.
@ishi71235 жыл бұрын
@@michaeljohnangel6359 romeo and juliet is overrated.
@Gameworks14075 жыл бұрын
@@ishi7123 true. But so Godot
@naethavenir94225 жыл бұрын
Godot is that one friend who finally agreed to play video games with but then when you’re going to pay an Online multiplayer game he never comes and you and your other friend are just there, waiting, if he will ever come up.
@laurenfontaine63104 жыл бұрын
The Lucky character is honestly one of the best parts. Like it’s outright hilarious as Lucky and Pozzo show such a bizarre relationship with the rope and the monologue of Lucky near the end
@TheloniousCube2 жыл бұрын
Hats off to you! A great, concise video on one of the 20th century's masterworks!
@kirbymarchbarcena6 жыл бұрын
The play seems an allegory of waiting for an event to give one's life true meaning.
@IngridSaybe5 ай бұрын
I cannot wait to tell you it is a great document. Truly entertainment, it has the essential. Interpretations make art even more attractive.
@null30074 жыл бұрын
So this is where Godot from Ace Attorney got his name from. Basically, the person waiting was Mia Fey, and by the time Godot arrived, Mia was dead. Whoever made the names for these Characters is a genius.
@JackeOfNoTrades10 ай бұрын
his name also comes from his real identity: dieGO armanDO (add a T to the end and there you go)
@gemofshinigamis Жыл бұрын
What a narration... I'm mesmerized.
@smnwbb4 жыл бұрын
The play is very much about love. SB tipped us off when he answered a question about Pozzo and Lucky: "I only know one thing - Pozzo loves Lucky." Taken that way, Lucky's speech isn't remotely absurd - no more than a ruined city is absurd. "He used to think beautifully." said Pozzo.
@aspiringcloudexpert51276 жыл бұрын
I will definitely read this play. It sounds very interesting. Also, the narrator of this video does a really, really good job. Hope he can do more of these!
@unleashingpotential-psycho94336 жыл бұрын
I will definitely consider reading this now.
@Sam_on_YouTube6 жыл бұрын
It's a play. Try to watch it. A much better experience. But Rozencratz and Gilderstern are Dead is better in my opinion. Also, Waiting for Guffman is a great film loosely based on Godot.
@emeken6 жыл бұрын
You can watch it on KZbin! It really drives home the absurdity.
@aadityadalal11986 жыл бұрын
Can you tell me which book u read (if you have bought one) or which one would you prefer
@ruiyanzhu32905 жыл бұрын
Somehow I think you’re being ironic
@Lostcarrot6 жыл бұрын
Studied this as part of my musical theatre degree. Absolutely loved it
@dariusthurman88355 жыл бұрын
The lesson was don't wait for someone to give your live meaning after chaos hits you. You just stagnate.
@Lucas-xt7lw6 жыл бұрын
More like "Waiting to have my face covered in scalding hot coffee"
@BassCrossMegamanSP6 жыл бұрын
I was searching for this reference.
@memeticzengine6 жыл бұрын
You found it. And it is good.
@vibecheck21326 жыл бұрын
AH YEAH GOOD REFERENCE MMMMMM FINALLY
@memeticzengine6 жыл бұрын
with this video i kinda saw it coming like "godot"
@Ssure26 жыл бұрын
Blend #102, his personal favourite
@smileforhiba6 жыл бұрын
I remember reading Waiting for Godot in my second year of uni ... It was frustrating yet its concept intrigued me ... i would have REALLY appreciated this if it was uploaded 3 years ago heheheh
@advisorypoly4 жыл бұрын
He also discussed the meaning of his work with actors when he directed the play.
@jumping4386 жыл бұрын
I'm waiting to read this book.
@cheeze68504 жыл бұрын
I love that ted ex always gives us a background of the writer!
@briantw4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, except this is TED-Ed.
@PaigeHarken6 жыл бұрын
Technically, the “absurdism” movement wasn’t a movement at all. There were multiple playwrights across the globe who all wrote plays in similar absurd styles without any sort of communication or planning with each other. It wasn’t until years later when scholars looked at these plays, all written around the same time, and said, “Hey, these are all very similar in these specific ways.” And then labeled the movement (if you’d like to call it that) absurdism.
@timothyjamison81726 жыл бұрын
That's absurd!
@mcboonekamp54006 жыл бұрын
Technically, most cultural movements developed without communication calling out its own specificis and were recognized and named in retrospect. But yeah, technically, you're right.
@paulryan21286 жыл бұрын
Paige - thanks for your contribution, I hadn't heard that pov before but it makes sense
@michaeljohnangel63595 жыл бұрын
Absurdism is truly absurd. It's only for pretentious no-brainers. Seriously, the stuff is moronic - it claims that for itself, and it's correct; only fools give it time.
@leonidasvazouras17966 жыл бұрын
That's it. TED-Ed turned into a reading recommendations and riddle channel.
@Ssure26 жыл бұрын
That's a good thing, right?
@fitnfab65226 жыл бұрын
I read this in my playwright class. We analyzed it, and of course not everyone liked it because it was a slow paced play. But, that's the point. I loved this play bc it is truth to our every day living. We wait, we live, we must be patient. What is this life....and not everyone will understand this play bc depending on your life experiences, this written play will either resonate with you or not. But at some point in life, as you been waiting or figuring your life out, this play will make more sense as you were waiting 😊
@humavocado5614 Жыл бұрын
For somereason procrastinating in holiday remind me of the this ted ed video. Hit hard Literally my only two brain cells left doing circular conversation Frfr 😂
@jacobwatson90275 жыл бұрын
Do “Why you should read the Little Prince”!
@khyatirawat6024 жыл бұрын
Hello there ! I have that one in my course. But with corona there are no classes. I would like to know what are your reasons for suggesting it to someone?
@youisstupid25864 жыл бұрын
Khyati Rawat it’s a classic, that’s a good reason enough.
@Robert-yc9ql3 жыл бұрын
My favorite interpretation of this is that it is an allegory of world religions and the absurdity of those forever stuck "waiting" for their promised messiah/prophet/paradise.
@femibabatunde45535 жыл бұрын
Samuel Beckett: what do we do now, now that we are happy? Me: we wait, life has a way of making us sad all over again
@emmab50355 жыл бұрын
for a level drama we're doing both godot and berkoff's adaption of metamorphosis. i don't think i'll find any other plays which so perfectly express the frustration of life; working yourself to death and waiting for, well, nothing. i play estragon and i love the character so much, it's been a real transformation in my acting abilities as i've found so much in him and so much in myself that sort of meet in the middle onstage. in this era of existentialism and anonymous authority and empty consumer capitalism, i really think absurdist theatre couldn't be more relevant.
@autumnisbetterthanspring6 жыл бұрын
After cutting my veins waiting for' Body to run out of blood Oh..oh...not today' baby heaven can wait
@LenaVoices7 ай бұрын
Normally I'm really good with older books and plays, but Godot challenged me when I read it last year for uni. I honestly understood it better watching it performed. That made it work better.
@ckaren001araujoh.96 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure not even Beckett knew what was the true meaning behind this play, because it can mean a lot of things in different times, maybe that's what he did.
@koleyw9323 жыл бұрын
I saw "Endgame" by Beckett and had no idea what I was seeing. Too deep for me, I needed a translator.
@moonlightboiii6 жыл бұрын
Please do an Albert Camus one! Edit: or anything more about the absurd or the Myth of Sisyphus
@givemeshelter.6 жыл бұрын
Jonas Regencia Absolutely! I love The Stranger ever since high school 1000 years ago. Funny since the book isn't at all that old.
@drayefsarra28815 жыл бұрын
i read that book nd just waw what about the stranger !!
@hashamkhan4220 Жыл бұрын
Vladimir: What do they say? Estragon: They talk about their lives. Vladimir: To have lived is not enough for them. Estragon: They have to talk about it. Vladimir: To be dead is not enough for them. Estragon: It is not sufficient.
@MrGregory7776 жыл бұрын
OBJECTION!
@vibecheck21326 жыл бұрын
MrGbere777 OVERRULLED I love how everyone is doing this :)
@TheLifeFormulaa6 жыл бұрын
Interesting stuff!
@vibecheck21326 жыл бұрын
I immediately thought of Godot from ace attorney.
@okamiameterasu7106 жыл бұрын
i think a good deal of people (including myself) did
@jandreamarquez84806 жыл бұрын
This was my 9th grade project and required us to summarize the whole play into 15 minutes, I remember reading this and never realizing or appreciating this play back then. I wish I could go back maybe life would've changed after then.
@cherishtheday22234 жыл бұрын
Q: Why should you read Waiting for Godot? A: _It is utterly meaningless_
@dmtdreamz77062 жыл бұрын
My first impression was a very strong one,’ repeated the prince. ‘When they took me away from Russia, I remember I passed through many German towns and looked out of the windows, but did not trouble so much as to ask questions about them. This was after a long series of fits. I always used to fall into a sort of torpid condition after such a series, and lost my memory almost entirely; and though I was not altogether without reason at such times, yet I had no logical power of thought. This would continue for three or four days, and then I would recover myself again. I remember my melancholy was intolerable; I felt inclined to cry; I sat and wondered and wondered uncomfortably; the consciousness that everything was strange weighed terribly upon me; I could understand that it was all foreign and strange. I recollect I awoke from this state for the first time at Basle, one evening; the bray of a donkey aroused me, a donkey in the town market. I saw the donkey and was extremely pleased with it, and from that moment my head seemed to clear.’ ‘A donkey? How strange! Yet it is not strange. Anyone of us might fall in love with a donkey! It happened in mythological times,’ said Madame Epanchin, looking wrathfully at her daughters, who had begun to laugh. ‘Go on, prince.’ ‘Since that evening I have been specially fond of donkeys. I began to ask questions about them, for I had never seen one before; and I at once came to the conclusion that this must be one of the most useful of animals-strong, willing, patient, cheap; and, thanks to this donkey, I began to like the whole country I was travelling through; and my melancholy passed away.’¹
@ochentaycincoalbricias6 жыл бұрын
Gonna be lots of references to Ace Atorney.
@vibecheck21326 жыл бұрын
eurehl5238 aLREADY MADE ONE YES
@Ssure26 жыл бұрын
References with a fragance of dark-coloured coffee, that is!
@sid98geek6 жыл бұрын
I just opened the video for the references.
@cristinewakesuphappy27986 жыл бұрын
thank you ted-ed. this is, by far, my favorite play.
@two-face10416 жыл бұрын
Not that I wouldn’t read this but as a theater person I’d much rather watch it on stage
@anamanaguchiv80356 жыл бұрын
Two-Face If you’re an actual theater person you’d read it and watch the play.
@NotOnQ6 жыл бұрын
If you were a true scotsman, you would read, watch, and perform the play.
@two-face10416 жыл бұрын
Anamanaguchi V I’d maybe read it after I see it
@two-face10416 жыл бұрын
Q Bical well I am not Scottish
@NotOnQ6 жыл бұрын
I was just alluding to a fallacy that Anamanaguchi had used, it was meant to be facetious
@goldbug71272 жыл бұрын
I was cast in a University production in 1972 as the Boy. I admit, I was too young to have the experience necessary to comprehend what I was involved with, and since I was in the cast, I didn't see the production. The Director prefaced each performance with a speech, telling the audience to take a pill they would find under their chair that would make them forget about the essay they invariably had to write. My father came to see me perform, and I was sure that he would be as confused as I was. He was a smart enough man, but he began working in a coal mine when he was sixteen. Incredibly, he explained it to me, saying that it reminded him of the Depression. No work, no prospects, living hand to mouth, lots of time to contemplate the struggles of the world. I recommend that you forego reading the script, and find a production to watch.
@AnonymousCaveman3 жыл бұрын
Had to research and do a paper on absurdism on my acting degree. Was truly fascinating and a brilliant play!
@sadianazneen56843 жыл бұрын
What brilliantly piece of work!
@janesda3 жыл бұрын
Aren't plays meant to be seen performed rather than read?
@shogun22153 жыл бұрын
Thought it might be worth mentioning, Beckett absolutely refused to let women to play the parts of Vladimir and Estragon, and Becketts' family still will not allow any official performance with female leads.
@cosmosflowermusic6 жыл бұрын
Sounds alot like the Lutece Twins from BioShock Infinite.
@Nani.1016 жыл бұрын
I read this play for my design class last year and I loved it
@oydeekoi82716 жыл бұрын
It’s just like Seinfeld’d pilot.
@lunarorbit7224 жыл бұрын
Just finished this gorgeous book. I'm here to re-watch this video.