Why The Non-Date Rolex Submariner is The Watch Collectors Choice

You can't deny that the symmetry in the dial is pleasing to the eye. #rolex #submariner #divewatch
Join our WhatsApp Watch Deals Group - chat.whatsapp.com/BCXW03l02aJ...

[@SmokeRingsPipeDreams]

I've always thought the no date looked better. Cleaner. Plus, I don't like to set the date, and when I don't set the date I feel bad. No date, no problems.

[@Watchtrader]

‘No date, no problems’ - I like that one

[@nichkej8833]

I actually feel the same, but IMO day and date are much more useful for me on a watch than the actual time (I find them really handy when checking the gym's closing times for example). I know you can look it up on your phone, but I prefer my watch to my phone for oretty much everything.

[@francisfowler4908]

I have gmt ii i never fix the date haha

[@Matt-uq3in]

The submariner is pure class with out the cyclops wort 🔥👌

[@tUBEROCKErPriyankar]

The Non Date one gives the full view of the dial without any obstructions. ❤

[@mrsmith8224]

There is a 124060 for 11450 Pounds on their shop Talk about a rip off and then you wonder

[@tzj21]

That’s because the ones sold on their shop is unworn. Also depends on date man, if it’s a 2024 then of course

[@BIG2hats]

How is that a rip off? It’s called business, how do you think the economy works?! How else do businesses pay their employees and bills??

[@rustydrog]

These lads would offer you £6k for you £8k pile of 20 pound notes

[@jeffroutledge9153]

It's really not a "non date Sub", it's just a Sub. They simply made a date version out of this. Also, I wouldn't refer to it as ugly in any way, shape or form. It is much more clean and perfectly symmetrical than the Sub date. Especially without the ugly cyclops glued on the crystal. No, this is the original base line Submariner in all it's perfection.

[@Watchtrader]

“The ugly duckling” is a figure of speech. The Submariner (without the date) is definitely a great looking watch

[@Classic_Vinyl_Only]

It’s not rare either

[@eddiel7635]

@@Classic_Vinyl_Only he said it’s ‘rarer’ not its rare. Pull your head out your arse.

[@mrebear9758]

​@@WatchtraderSubmariner*

[@BIG2hats]

It’s definitely ugly compared to the date version come on, just look at this thing

[@Soulheads-yy3zq]

Date of no date, hardtop or convertible, waxed or hairy… one isn’t better… it’s all about your preference.

[@mema4922]

Obviously 😂

[@mrb6597]

Nope, no-date is actually better. 😂

[@Soulheads-yy3zq]

@@mrb6597 I wear the 124060 so no argument from me on your opinion.

[@thematthewlong]

True dive watch - date window affects vision while 75 meters under water.

[@DizzKidz]

I think the no date looks better. After getting one though, I understand the convenience of having a date window. If i cant get a titanium yacht master, my next rolex will be a blue jubilee gmt.

[@nintendokings]

These guys will say whether nonsense to make the watch seem like a good deal

[@philipsoucie3015]

I would buy everyone I could find at that price. That sells in Canada 10-13K all day long.

[@HammerK99]

Shout to archieluxury. Lol And it being rare isn’t the reason. It’s bc of the cleaner dial/look and the fact that the original sub never had a date. 1954 I believe.

[@johnt2694]

No Date IMO has a cleaner look and better symmetry. Not a big fan of the Cyclops and having to set the date.

[@kingofthebridge8339]

Rarer, cheaper, cheaper to service and nicer dial.

[@galandaleonardogabriel4508]

I just got my Submariner a month ago.. Gold on black bazel, date of course... If i would have waited another month i would have got it for at least 600-800€ cheaper... The watch market is plunging down...

[@tellsteveharveyidontwanthe2283]

buy whichever you like more its all hype and demand it will probably always switch up

[@pachy44]

I just bought that watch on March 20 from my AD in NJ... 😎 ⌚️

[@WATCH-4U]

I love this model

[@ANONYMOUS-xo1qm]

Everytime I see this guy rip someone off I get so pissed.I can’t take it anymore,pressing the don’t recommend button

[@Fishin_Carolina]

It’s not him, it’s the whole industry. Everyone I hear a dealer talk I feel like I need to take a shower.

[@MultiSeriousness]

Holes case with engraved Rehaut? Something doesn’t seem right

[@paulmartin3242]

How can I buy one for 6k

[@Watchtrader]

You’d most likely need to have a retail store

[@jaimereyes3583]

Fr

[@jaimereyes3583]

@@Watchtrader ahh

[@pauliewalnuts5241]

6k? Very low ball offer.

[@no79way]

The problem it doesn’t come in green

[@sergim66]

124060, the best Sub!

[@Maia.loves_moons]

No way the 14060m is killer! I’ve had both including a Starbucks & the 14060m is just perfect!

[@TakeAmericaBack2010]

False. IG is used to do one thing “influence”. Do your own research.

[@modmod392]

£6k…!!?? Must be a 35% mark up. Jeez.

[@Harpreet06]

It's my choice because I hate the cyclops

[@ernstachildiyev2155]

How does it make it more “rarer” just because it’s less popular? Rolex makes the same amount of stock regardless of demand.

[@tynchytemper9618]

Wouldn't be seen dead with a Sub with the cyclops

[@Matt-uq3in]

Spot on 👌

[@Mohamed_ElSheikh1]

Is that one available ? and please what serial is it M ,Y ,T ?

[@Watchtrader]

It belongs to a customers, however we have similar in stock

[@Mohamed_ElSheikh1]

@@Watchtrader which serial is it

[@Watchtrader]

We have 2 16610’s (Submariner Date) 2008 and 2009

[@Mohamed_ElSheikh1]

@@Watchtrader any no date ones 14060 ?

[@Watchtrader]

Not in stock at this moment but we can source one for you quickly. Email [e-mail] or call our shop tomorrow and we can discuss. Thank you

[@pauljohnson3686]

So.. If you pay £6000.. How much do you sell it for?

[@BIG2hats]

About 8-12k depending on condition and year

[@sundown6436]

way below market price....

[@tafkawac]

i'll give him 6.5k

[@chrispalmer8038]

How much are you guys selling a no date for?

[@Watchtrader]

Which model are you interested in?

[@chrispalmer8038]

A 1993 non ceramic no date 16610?

[@Watchtrader]

Please email [e-mail], head to our website or give us a call tomorrow and we can discuss. Thank you

[@FeathersMcGraw90]

Beleive it or not the is not the non date sub but the submariner. Then you have the submariner date

[@islandstonie8978]

What a scammers, just paying 6.000 for this watch

[@Watchtrader]

How much would you buy this for in your retail store? We didn’t buy the watch either

[@jesusavalos5548]

MOST people prefer the no date over the date.

[@BIG2hats]

Most people don’t even know isn’t exists and it’s ugly af compared to the date version

[@dralzgamer2354]

“Rarer” is a fancy term for less popular. Less demand, less supply. Easy as that

[@eerr1438]

It’s rarer 😂? The ugly duckling?😂 These fellas crack me up?? Total 🏀 ocks

[@itheus]

Love this bullshit

[@haroldconner6265]

No date no interest

[@Watchtrader]

Best symmetry

[@tynchytemper9618]

No taste

[@haroldconner6265]

@@tynchytemper9618 no brain

[@M_8735]

Bad rip off merchants these

[@gumbo7215]

Why?

[@Agent-vj3ns]

My iced out Invicta Gladiator is better 👑

[@TheAgeRating]

6k lmaooo nah

[@mauricedottore9807]

Sub rare 😅😅😅 145 on chrono 😂😂

[@leethirling9913]

The watch at the bottom of video is a cheap copy 😂

[@lettuce1305]

How?

[@leethirling9913]

@lettuce1305 the pins to hold the watch to the strap are visible through the watch casing

[@lettuce1305]

​@@leethirling9913that's a 5 digit No date Sub ref 14060M. All 14060 or 14060M have drilled lugs on the case and pretty much almost all sports Rolex models had drilled lugs prior to 2003.