Why US Troops Fought Wagner Mercenaries in Syria

[@lardexloser7318]

Russia gives a medal to its soldiers for surviving the US Military. How flattering

[@gravyd316]

It's not really a big deal though. We give our soldiers participation medals also. The fact that they were pmc soldiers getting medals is something...... But also nothing.

[@the_coolest_man_on_earth]

Until there's an air defence system, you see how f**ked up US troops were.

[@xxgodskrpxx9848]

its cute. 😂

[@TheFivegoodemperors]

Technically I think it’s Assad that gave them awards but your point still stands.

[@tylerdurden4006]

Lol right? The american army had to give up after 2 decades and join the Taliban in the end. 😂 who joins the Taliban? 😂😂

[@chubulu9842]

This incident was one of the cases where Prigozhin felt he was let down by rival generals/senior leaders at ministry of defense. When US called Moscow to inquire about the approaching Wagner convoy Russia literally disowned the convoy and that led for US Air Force to play video game style attack on them.

[@TheOpethOfMastodon]

Banking on Russian brass just expecting the US to be caught completely off guard.

[@heyhoe168]

Not just that, ministry of defence also silently called off the air defence. It was straight up betrayal. And probably this forced wagners to buy own air defence systems.

[@VinceBreeze]

Russia doesn't want these people back on Russian soil, it's the same reason Russia allowed tens of thousands of unvetted people to leave Russia into Syria to join ISIS

[@masterlightjames950]

Keep making excuses for atrocities

[@uku4171]

Because the entire reason for Wagner's existence is for Russia to commit deniable crimes. If they had said these soldiers were theirs, and they had gone ahead and killed Americans, that would've caused retaliation and likely war.

[@braydenperkins7047]

I would wager that part of the reason they had to wait for Russian AA systems to be disabled was because they couldn’t attack the AA without starting another incident

[@208flatheads3]

He states that they would of had have been hit with cruise missiles

[@Bardghost_Isu]

Indeed, Either way those Wagnerites were dead. It was just a question of will the russians be dumb enough to say that the attacking force includes russians and they won't turn the air defence systems off and force us to blow them up, or will they shut them down and let us sort it out without a wider conflict.

[@pablodelsegundo9502]

Nothing gets past you, huh?

[@ServerFirewatch]

Yeah, I note F-35s weren’t involved, which I bet were standing by for SEAD and DEAD ops if Russia confirmed it was them and refused to back down.

[@Ura.rosskiye_semya]

Well it would break both agreement. Russia can't directly attack US or Israel and NATO and vice versa

[@lordsesshomaru8960]

"The battle of Conoco underscored the importance of air power and owning the night". Bravo!

[@RVered]

Tragically, multiple Russian investigative journalists were assa...ehm...I mean, died totally-coincidental, unrelated, and explicable deaths following their attempts to research and publish information about this incident. Rest in Peace, Maksim Borodin, Orkhan Dzhemal, Alexander Rastorguyev, and Kirill Radchenko.

[@abstractapproach634]

"Epsteined", I do believe may be the word your looking for.

[@raevj]

Putin is so evil.

[@klaabu99]

i think this list is a bit longer ...

[@robertp457]

This speaks to the bravery of those journalists, I’m sure they were well aware of the risks they take to find the truth and expose it.

[@maksimfedoryak]

​@@robertp457this must be written near every journalist faculty in russia🌝

[@MrAsullivan12]

Its not that the US couldnt have dealt with the SAM sites, especially having the F22 there. Its that the US knew the SAM sites belonged to Russia proper and didnt want to destroy them. Once they were turned off, then the US had a field day

[@johndoh5182]

Yeah he pointed that out in the end, it was either that or let our special forces die. If Russia didn't agree to shut down there anti-air defense then cruise missiles would have taken them out.

[@NWilson-r6l]

@@johndoh5182 Yep! Turn off your air defenses or we'll turn them off permanently😉.

[@Kaiserland111]

Thanks for voicing what I was thinking. Cappy made it sound like we were at the mercy of the Russians, at least until he corrected himself in the last 2 mins, which was quite annoying. In fact, we probably TOLD the Russian that they needed to turn off their AA or we'd blow them up.

[@SusCalvin]

@@johndoh5182 At the time it was known that the USA and Russia were both present in syrian airspace, and were trying to co-exist in some way. News media had reported about non-firing shows of force and butting eachothers vehicles around. Wagner wasn't mentioned as much, they were "russian mercenaries" in large parts of the press. But it was sort of clear that the russian presence in Syria was more or less official. In the following days, the russian MoD kept denying everything. Instead we got a show where a PMC and their trained locals haplessly tried to take on a national armed force plus allied locals. For me it was a show of why PMCs in modern high-intensity combat are grossly overrated. They can stick to low-intensity security roles, training, logistics and counterinsurgency. A few PMCs with tanks do not make an army.

[@SusCalvin]

@@johndoh5182 I don't think a company of Blackwater guys with their own trained local auxiliaries and a detachment of tanks would have done a much better job either, if they had somehow been sent to do the same that day.

[@WilliamBrothers]

Russia didnt even give Wagner a chance to pull out before turning off those air defenses. They practically sent them to their deaths

[@romanzusman2892]

Prigozhin stated that a month or two before the attempted coup actually, it is not a secret anyway

[@samfisher9421]

russia wasnt there it was wagnar mostly consisting of local syrians dont listen to this bs and read up the REAL story troops didnt even engage in the field it was mostly howitzers 5 apaches and a ac130

[@thomasmichael559]

Explains why Prigozhin hate the MOD.

[@longforgotten4823]

Prigozhin said strike one against the ministry of defense.

[@disguyzful]

​@@samfisher9421i hate this bro vet commentary

[@johnkennedy9222]

That was absolutely brilliant insight. Thank you from Lancashire UK

[@Shoelaces77]

This shows the importance of combined arms. The Sf group might have been overwhelmed alone, but US military don’t fight alone😊

[@SusCalvin]

I'd like to know about the local allies. My impression was that the attack was against both a small special forces platoon and various local allies.

[@luisnavasero9516]

Yes america never fight alone still in trauma on vietnam war and to be more classy Withdrawal is the term in Afghanistan like racism they changed it to hate crime hahaha Fight CHINA alone not using Taiwan Fight Russia.prove to the world You are land of the brave ,,ifnotomit that unyournationalanthem fooling other countries to be alliedthen agreement is nxt haha fight for me

[@brianv1988]

​@@SusCalvinmore than likely Kurdish or pro Democratic Syrian forces

[@PythonLee]

What are the USA doing in Syria? it's an invasion Russia was invited by the legal government, the USA wasn't.

[@SusCalvin]

@@brianv1988 Democratic syrian is hard to define because it's an umbrella organization of a lot of rebel groups. I know some of them have been pushed back under turkish protection, in their buffer zone up in northern Syria. al-Assad might be able to retake cities near the coast with russian help, but he and the russians are not keen on ousting actual foreign armed forces. There's a standoff between the turkish army and their syrian proxies and the forces of the syrian-arab state with occasional yearly skirmishes.

[@fbcpraise]

This whole incident was so under-reported, at first it seemed like a rumor. All this time I’ve wondered “why??” The best i could come up with was Wagner would get a bonus if they could embarrass the US and it couldn’t be traced to Putin. The oil field explanation makes sense, but they were crazy to think we would take this lying down.

[@drthagore6499]

This happened in 2018 when Trump was president. I think it was because the media in the US were invested in the Russian-collusion narrative, so Trump blowing up Russians would undermine that.

[@abn76280]

It was under reported because Trump didn't want to criticize his boss. When Putin monitoring the elections saw Trump was losing , I'm sure HE ordered Trump to vacate the Syrian bases. Trump is owned by Putin!

[@PythonLee]

The USA has no business being in Syria, it is an invasion of a sovereign country Russia was invited by the legal government.

[@ast.george3565]

Crazy to think that you would take them fulfilling the will of the incumbent president of Syria lying down?😅

[@johnbaker4246]

If it was widely reported the US public might have asked too many questions about what we were doing invading yet another country (Syria).

[@Amradar123]

The most interesting thing is that by turning of the AA russia betrayed their inofficaly supported Wagner troops to maintain deniability. So that also partly explains the current tensions with Wagner.

[@drewodessa2483]

They had to turn them off. Once the Russian MoD responded that they had no troops any active SAM systems would have been suspected as being Syrian or Iranian violating the RoE/MOU so they could have been struck w/o repercussion.

[@lllPlatinumlll]

That doesn't necessarily make sense, the aircraft could have needed to approach across the Syrian territory.

[@schuschnix5261]

I dont remember 100% where I read or saw this(im sure I can find it again if people want a source), but to keep it short, according to said source this incident was what made prigozhin angry versus russian MoD.prigozhin and parts of wagner allied with some syrian warlord and they made a push for said ressources/refinery. the us command called the russians up and asked them are these your guys?and they said no they are not. this would very well combine with turning the AA off(I didnt know about this until now)

[@Defnit]

They ignored the warning shots and tried to wait out the predator strikes cause they’re probably used to us falling back when the higher ups aren’t involved. Russian gov did not communicate to them and thats why they didn’t know it was different this time. Maybe cause they didn’t want to be recorded communicating with them? That’s why Wagner boss was pissed at Putin?

[@Zeknif1]

@@schuschnix5261This would also lead to a major push for heavy equipment acquisition by Wagner as well as kitting out and training an artillery unit specifically for counterbattery operations. The effectiveness of the Wagner counterbattery has been cited as one of the major differences that Ukrainians noticed between Wagner forces and the Russian regulars as a source of significant difficulties that Ukraine faced trying to hold Bakhmut.

[@KilyanAustin]

This mission was the definition of "fuck around and find out"

[@Joe-guit]

Question is what the usa was/ is doing there. Not welcome,, means get out.

[@Vasco0982]

@@Joe-guit They went there to kill ISIS, would you rather the world let ISIS conquer all of the middle east?

[@capitandelnorte]

​@@Joe-guit : I guess Wagner was'nt welcome either huh?

[@Joe-guit]

@@capitandelnorte actually Russia has been allied with Syria. So they were welcome there. The usa should rightly get out. Just facts.

[@DavidPage-u7x]

@@Joe-guit USA would like to see Asad fall. So he doesn't welcome them, but his rebels do.

[@johnssmith4005]

Lukashenko told Putin that Wagner wants to go on a trip to Poland HOW UTTERLY DELUSIONAL CAN THEY BE ? 🤣😂🤣

[@piotrd.4850]

Poland has no military left to speak of and exteremely inefficient, slow and lenient political leadership.

[@u2beuser714]

​@@piotrd.4850 100 Rubels deposited to your account. Good job comrade

[@alexmarinescu2873]

they can go...but they will not come back!

[@chojnb]

@@piotrd.4850 for now all we can see is Syrian refuge that try to cross our border from Belarus but don't you worry we are preparing for this hybrid war ... ruska onuco

[@Sandals578]

Nah man they are hoping to get another round of medals for any who survives.

[@spoddie]

The most amazing thing to me about this story is the command and communication by the US. The list of different units was amazing, Green Berets, Delta Force, Marines, armour, air force, and this is all handled by a central command. Not sure that the general public realises how amazing this is.

[@GhostlyTurtle]

Very true. All the military might in the world won't win a war if it is never in the right place at the right time shooting in the right direction. It is boring and unglamorous but logistics, communication, and organization win wars more so than having the biggest gun.

[@Michael-ow1pv]

They don’t. But the ones of us who do, love it.

[@spoddie]

@@Michael-ow1pv I carried a 77 set on my back and lucky if I could talk to Bn HQ, so it's all a bit sci-fi to me.

[@cfcook76]

The US friendly fire debacle in Granada was the incident that caused the US to redesign its C3 (as it was known at the time)

[@SusCalvin]

The european NATO forces try to reach that level of command when task forces can include several different european nations.

[@alexandertaylor1225]

"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte. I love that our last airstrike during this battle was from the B-52 which was completely a..."AND STAY OUT!" statement. :D

[@tomoh160]

Funny how Russia ended pushing USA out of Syria in the end.

[@JohnnyD-u7]

No doubt 😆

[@Sugarnaut]

Sweet B-52’s !!!

[@miriamweller812]

The irony, since it's US fascism that got ZERO right to be there on the other side of the planet, ruining another country and trying to install an ISIS state (as usual miserably failing at that).

[@PatrickMJr]

And stay out! 🤣🤌🤘🇺🇸

[@bobbycole7537]

Russia: we have no troops in the area America: we can confirm that statement 😅

[@Joe-guit]

USA should not be there. Are they still?

[@spirit1803]

​@@Joe-guitwomp womp

[@GunChat]

@@Joe-guitRussia should not be there are they still?

[@glutenfree7057]

@@Joe-guit You know how you people always complain about American intervention? Well, let me turn that around: RUSSIA SHOULD NOT BE INTERVENING IN THE MIDDLE EAST. RUSSIA SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN IN SYRIA, AND SHOULD GET OUT OF SYRIA BECAUSE THEY ARE STILL THERE. RUSSIA SHOULD GET OUT OF UKRAINE.

[@obamasglock]

I deployed to MSS Conoco a few years after that engagement. I've heard a couple of first hand accounts. A shame you didn't mention the artillery battery that supressed the tank collumn, pinning them down while air support was coming on station. One of the few times the US has used the m777 against an actual armored formation.

[@titaniumskunkogkush4365]

Did you fight for the freedom of the Syrian people or the interest of the oil corporation? Lol.

[@danstotland6386]

@@titaniumskunkogkush4365 The answer to your question is a firm YES!

[@JuiceExotic]

yeah this video is missing soooo much info :(

[@B01]

They found out real quick what happens when you get between America and oil 🤣 Iran about to find out the same in Straight of Hormuz, 15 years from now we will see all the re-enactments of 100 anti ship missiles against a few Iranian Navy vessels🤣

[@titaniumskunkogkush4365]

@@danstotland6386 lol. I'm glad you figured out it was a trick question. Lol

[@philchristmas4071]

When you get a patch or medal just for surviving, you know you took a proper a$$ whooping.

[@bieber_and_dolik]

Sorry to hurt your feelings guys but only 15-50 pmc died in the incident most of them not directly from the strikes.Go check for yoursef if you don't believe.

[@TheOpethOfMastodon]

​@@bieber_and_dolikWhatever you say Ivan

[@0816M3RC]

​@@bieber_and_dolik Post proof or delete your account.

[@xxkamikazexx5150]

​@@bieber_and_dolikcopium

[@tsubadaikhan6332]

@@bieber_and_dolik Yeah. A guy who recruits foreigners and prisoners for his PMC is definitely going to tell the truth to you about how many of his contractors died.

[@Southerly93]

The results weren't surprising at all. The US has spent the GDP of smaller countries creating the most lethal hardware possible, and most 9f it was specifically made to rival what russia claimed its weapons could do. When Wagner used russian tactics and hardware to fight the US, an entire cold war's worth of intensive R&D came to bear on them with predictable results.

[@andersonandrighi4539]

The gap was not that big during the Cold War. It is like the US has become Goku in DBZ. The gap keeps increasing.

[@StrawHat83]

@@andersonandrighi4539 Lol, the gap was that big during the Cold War. We didn't realize it, but the Soviets never stood a chance.

[@simplex7096]

@@StrawHat83 and yet they only succeeded because the russians turn of the air defense systems... if western tactics were that effective the russians wouldnt be hable to do what they are doing in ukraine. im not defending the russians i hate them war criminals, its just you guys are underestimating their capabilities. As for example, ukrainians are using more artillery shells around 7000 in a day than US can produce in a month, the russians there are reports they are using more than 50k a day, the difference is giant

[@eastern_fox1238]

@@StrawHat83 soviets couldve steamrolled the Allies at the end of ww2. But it soon lost its advantage as the US just became a technological powerhouse.

[@wyskass861]

You're missing the point, that Wagner is not representative of Russian military power. This isn't Russia vs US. Any unit which is sacrificed by their nation so coldly, would get destroyed. They are meant for this type of thing. If they succeeded great, but they were never going to be supported by Russia and that was the point. Delta Force would have met the same fate if the US left them out to dry like that, going against every weapon of Russia. This not to say Russia is a great military, as Ukraine has shown. My point is that this isn't a comparison of US vs Russia capability, but that Russia has no regard for their own human lives.

[@patrickchase5614]

I think that it's unfair to say that this demonstrated any vulnerability in US doctrine. If the Russians hadn't disabled their SAM systems that would have kept the B-52 out, but the remaining US air assets (especially the F-22s) would have been capable of operating. The F-15s and AH-64s would have been forced down to the deck, but that's how they train. I believe that the reason the Russians "agreed" to turn off their AA systems was because they didn't want that sort of direct conflict. The call was something along the lines of "Is this you? If it is, then we can fight. If not, let us in to deal with it and we won't".

[@harleyfee364]

Thats exactly what it was. The phone call was more or less "If this isn't you turn off your AA, if it is we are going to take it out." Russia couldn't leave their AA on without indirectly admitting they were using that AA to protect Russians.

[@hi117117]

I think one thing that didn't get enough attention is what you mentioned at the end. The US actually had multiple options to deal with the advancing Russian armor, and the fact that they turned off air defenses is just the best outcome. it's not that the US was powerless without the Russians turning off their air defense, it's that the alternatives meant an escalation. when we are talking about using this battle as a test bed for the different tactics, we're always doing it assuming that there's going to be an open conflict, and we won't have to go back and forth about well that'll escalate this or something. and as soon as we take the escalation factor off the table, more options open up as you mentioned. we could have used cruise missiles, and launched them earlier while they were still preparing rather than right as they were attacking, we could have used some of the planes on the back line to launch air-to-ground missiles potentially outside of air defense range in order to allow the Air Force in, or we could have gone with long-range missiles only, or we could have swarmed them with drones... The list goes on but it shows that both sides were constrained by the geopolitics and so this maybe isn't the parallel that others say it is.

[@jackwalker9492]

Bullseye!

[@Theduckwebcomics]

Haha I think you're being rather optimistic and fantastical here in your evaluation of the options 😅

[@TRM.352]

@@TheduckwebcomicsHow’s that exactly?

[@galatians-2.20]

​@@Theduckwebcomicsplease elaborate. Are you doubting America's military power, adaptability, and tactics?

[@baronvonlimbourgh1716]

If russia wouldn't have turned them off, the usa would have turned them off for them in order to take care of the soldiers holding the objective. And would have dealt with the concequences later.

[@Taskandpurpose]

Thanks for watching spare parts army ! The most interesting thing about this battle to me was some of the larger geopolitical considerations that brought these two forces into Syria in the first place. The reasons are hotly debated. Some say the US was mainly there to protect oil while the official claim is they were there to fight ISIL. Can't wait to hear what you guys think. Follow me on instagram for behind the scenes updates: instagram.com/cappyarmy and twitter for thoughts: twitter.com/Cappyarmy (I mean "X" ??")

[@julianshepherd2038]

You give the impression Assad and ISIL were on the same side.

[@cjwrench07]

It was for both reasons, but not for US profiteering. The Syrian Democratic Forces cannot economically support themselves, & the millions of internal refugees they protect, without a steady source of income. The refineries, oilfields, and waterways were also the primary targets of ISIL’s original advances; and Assad, Russia, and Iran’s later attacks to retake the same resources from them. Nobody fights for free, and civilians can’t survive on thoughts & prayers.

[@stedyedy23]

You got this idea from the brother in arms video haha

[@sudligh]

Correction - Wagner is not a typical mercenary group (at least in the full sense of that word) but rather a state-funded paramilitary organization that acts as a de facto private army of Russian president Vladimir Putin’s former close ally Yevgeny Prigozhin. Wagner has been involved in various conflicts and operations around the world, often in support of Russian interests or allies, and has been accused of human rights violations and war crimes. Wagner’s founder and leader, Prigozhin, is a wealthy businessman with a criminal record who is known as “Putin’s chef” because he provided catering for the Kremlin. He is also under US sanctions for his alleged role in interfering in the 2016 US presidential election. Wagner’s first field commander is believed to have been Dmitry Utkin, a veteran of Russia’s wars in Chechnya and a nazi, who used “Wagner” as his radio call sign.

[@StevenOfWheel]

@@cjwrench07 "but not for US profiteering" Yeah, there is absolutely nothing to profit from supporting the enemy of an enemy, especially when such support might lead to destabilizing other governments in the region deemed unfriendly to US interests, nor there is no profit in actually having military control over oil-rich lands, right? What I find most confusing is that you actually reached the correct conclusion yourself: "Nobody fights for free"! That includes the US as well, and you can call it profit, interest, it does not matter, it underlies the same principle

[@Harrington2323]

The problem wasn´t that russian air defence was active. I would say the problem was that US troops couldn´t attack russian air defence positions directly. That´s the reason Wagner is so useful. You can attack without direct russian gouvernement involvement.

[@w7lves]

That’s the job of any PMC, plausible deniability, that’s what BlackWater is for in the US.

[@thomashsiai6250]

⁠@@w7lvesBlackwater is no where near the scale of Wagner, their duties are primarily security not military.

[@thedudemister77]

That was a great breakdown. I kept thinking, "What about..." and you covered it all.

[@crimsonhalo13]

"I died for oil" is the most anticlimactic epitaph ever.

[@globaladdict]

In the grand scheme of things, most soldiers die for strategic resources. Even in ww2, Germany and Japan fought to gain territory with resources they needed

[@humansvd3269]

@@globaladdict Except the two big players are nuclear armed....

[@fertilerevitilizer7833]

Oil is needed for our lives.

[@titaniumskunkogkush4365]

@@fertilerevitilizer7833 what else do you need in life genius? Do you go around stealing it?

[@fertilerevitilizer7833]

@@titaniumskunkogkush4365 dying for oil is dying for life

[@Imnotpolish-]

The funeral part hit way to close to to home. My uncle died in Iraq and I’m not one of Putins bots but I feel like we can all agree war is hell and no man, woman, or child should have to go through it.

[@Tacos888]

Meh

[@tylerdurden4006]

Speaking of funerals, dare you to look up "ukrainian nazi funeral" to see how they still wear swastikas and the ww2 uniforms to bury the dead fighting for ukraine.

[@swifftpurchase6490]

@@Tacos888Fool 🤡

[@THECDG999]

Amen. It is just greed. To take foreign countries natural resources. Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, all over Central and South America puppet governments US imposed

[@Dion7765]

With all do respecrt to your uncle and many like him! Male and Female alike! Nobody can underestimate the passion of many (mark words) .Many U.S personnel. Certianly your uncle is included in that declaration as one of our many! However, his memory is being betrayed by our current government. You call me whatever you feel. This is my belief . This man is a propagandist!

[@oso1165]

Why 0 mention of the artillery from the marines ? Played a huge role

[@JAnx01]

Artillery is nowadays the most effective and cost-efficient weapon. But it isn't fancy enough to attract normies' attention.

[@longforgotten4823]

Is artillery now considered the bass player of the military? Extremely necessary for structure yet completely forgotten in reflection videos?

[@maksimfedoryak]

​@@JAnx01until u talk about shells with GPS or mine laying shells

[@oso1165]

@@longforgotten4823 probably cuz it's so old. We associate it with the same family as field cannons from the 1600s lol so it's not flashy and cool like modern tech

[@crazyoilfieldmechanic3195]

He doesn't seem to want to answer your question.......

[@goldennuggetofwisdom5068]

I loved how Prigozhin managed to weasel his way into history. He followed in Napoleon's and Hitler's steps when he marched on Moscow. How cool is that.

[@simonschneider5913]

prigoshin was a honeytrap. it worked quite well.

[@christianguzman8228]

US: “Hey Russia, I think some of your guys have cross the river into our AO.” Russia: “No, there’s no Russians there, teehee” US: “Say less.” Russia: “Wait, no”

[@stevesoutlook2675]

Lmaoooo

[@Sorcerers_Apprentice]

MoD hates Wagner, so whoever told the US diplomat 'there are no Russian solders in that group', was smiling and putting his fingers together like Mr. Burns from The Simpsons as he watched USAF turn Wagnerites and their allies into paste.

[@DirtyMikeandTheBoyz]

😂😂😂

[@johnwray393]

Russia don't give af if some mercs get smoked.

[@doobs930069]

The audio transcripts are somewhere here on YT. Thats basically how it went. Once we brought hell upon them, Russia asked us to stop lol

[@Zer0_Cool69]

This story never gets old 😊

[@tomoh160]

Same as LOTR, Harry Potter and other works of fiction.

[@yeshuamaure8039]

Yeah I know. Bullsh!t stories like this stink for a long time.

[@wc2195]

@@tomoh160cope

[@darthsidious4499]

@@yeshuamaure8039Russian bot 🤡

[@ghostly6175]

​@@yeshuamaure8039the interviews with the surviving Wagner forces are fake then too

[@horrorfan117]

I would argue that the Russian anti air was more a diplomatic problem than a military one. If the US went in and the Russians shot at one of ours that could escalate into a war. There is no way that the US didn't know it was in the area, and didn't have a countermeasure for it.

[@208flatheads3]

They either shut em down or they don't exist any more. The f 22's were out there for a reason.. no way they were gonna let all those special force soldiers get overrun and killed... Could you imagine the outrage of the American people they were all killed or taken prisoners?

[@humansvd3269]

I was an AWACS crewmember. We knew what was there.

[@klaabu99]

u missed the point US asked russia are their forces attacking ... russia answered that they are not involved ... and turned off AA to avoid problems with US

[@JAnx01]

You're acting as if countermeasures give planes some kind of a God mode.

[@TenebrusI07]

@@JAnx01 Countermeasures no, US AWACS yes

[@RiceBoy1975]

Can’t be more proud of my American buddies. We Australian love American.❤❤❤❤❤

[@coyoteeffect]

kings in arms

[@aricardonery69]

@@coyoteeffectit is 2024 now,I’d like to know how proud you all are now! 😂😂😂😂😂

[@julietoozie]

And vice versa.

[@cliffordrandell735]

That's probably because you know that us Americans love Aussies:) Even us cowboys in Oklahoma love Australia 🦘

[@cliffordrandell735]

I just wish you guys were allowed to own guns for self defense. I can't understand that.

[@Turbo_Noises]

The Air Force dropped half their annual budget that day

[@VunderGuy]

Which only goes to show you the power of Russian shovels and that without it's air force, American combat doctrine completely and utterly falls apart.

[@asog88]

More like a days worth

[@atroxiv]

​@@VunderGuysure, but does Russia really have the capability to deny American air dominance? I'll answer for you, no, no they don't.

[@Turbo_Noises]

@@VunderGuy that’s why we have the two biggest air forces in the world.

[@prodigalsoniv48]

@@VunderGuywow almost like not using your Air Force is a sign of incompetence 🤠👍🏾

[@terrywilson588]

You definitely did the best video on this incident. Your video is the only one that mentions turning off the air defense which changed everything

[@torinnbalasar6774]

Wow, Russia *really* left Wagner out to dry. I hadn't realized they had SAMs covering the area that they *turned off* to let the USAF in without contest.

[@humansvd3269]

Problem is, it's an escalation that can lead into war. It's more of a question of, "Is this really worth going to WW3 over?"

[@jonspear5411]

You really want us all to die, don't you? In WW3 no one is a "winner"

[@bonefletcher1682]

WOW! American heroes again fought 1 vs 100 Russians and won. Thanks Rembo for the lessons.

[@snackette]

The Russian AAA was only a disadvantage in this instance because we weren't actively looking to destroy them, that would have been a direct attack from the U.S. against Russia. If we needed them gone by any means necessary, they would've ceased exsistance. But Russia was forced to lower them at the risk of admiting collaboration with the attack.

[@neolad]

Yup, as has been made very visible in Ukraine. If Russian air defence is wanted gone, it's quite easy to do just that with advanced weaponry.

[@TheWorldsOkayestUSMarine]

@@neolad So Ace Combat lied to me? Where is the MiG-25 Foxbat or the SU-57 or the SU-69? :( No dogfights

[@ThePandafriend]

@@TheWorldsOkayestUSMarine Dogfights are a thing of the past. Nowadays missiles are launched from a large distance and guided into the target. That's how Russians fight the Ukrainian Air Force: They launch a long range radar guided air to air missile from safe airspace towards Ukrainian jets, which leads to mission kills or kills. Unfortunately right now we didn't send anything which counters this and most likely it will take until the next year for them getting the capability to do something against this. Other than destroying the planes on the air fields using drones or missiles of course.

[@bcarter9252]

So WHY was the US ILLEGALLY in Syria? LEt me guess....to STEAL OIL

[@sam8404]

​@@ThePandafriendyou can find videos of dogfights over Ukraine. They are pretty rare nowadays but do still happen.

[@James-Johnson313]

A heartwarming bedtime story to tell to my children.

[@wakes_inc]

Kinda sucks that this was Delta instead of devgru. If it had been the seal pups, we'd know a lot more because of the 15 books they would have written by now.

[@taintwasher3703]

Actually Delta operators put out a lot, including the founder of Delta Force, Charlie Beckwith. Which I recommend anyone who wants to figure out how to get into Delta to read

[@stillcantbesilencedevennow]

Lol. They BOTH be writing.

[@rhiannonpoling1244]

Mali's Tuareg rebels just gave Wagner another a** beating.

[@ladeedaa]

Clearly if f-22's responded, America had a plan even if air defense was active! 🇺🇸

[@dogguy8603]

Exactly, if the AA was active the F-22 would have just gone "yahh that don't work on me" and then hit its target

[@yayeetmeoffacliff4708]

​@@dogguy8603but F-22s can't carry A2G ordinance right? It was designed for air superiority, not ground pounding. The F-35 would've been a better choice to send in this situation but.. I dont know if any were stationed there

[@vincere_]

@@yayeetmeoffacliff4708 They spent a couple billion giving it A2G capability by around 2011. As for whether using F-22's would've been worth the cost to US taxpayers compared to other means available, well...

[@jloiben12]

@@dogguy8603 It would have been like the USS Wisconsin. See that hill over there? It is now a hole

[@alexh3974]

Yup. It would just laugh, and send the AA missile systems into scrap metal.

[@smokeypuppy417]

I was in Syria at the time in KLZ, i remeber higher ups briefed us on the attack, told us to anticipate a possible retalitory attack.

[@SusCalvin]

Something I was curious of at the time was the US allies. The USA was and is supporting a variety of local groups and were practically hosted by the YPG. When this hit the news, my impression was that a US special forces platoon, local allies and some massive US fire support had beaten back a mixed troop of russian mercenaries and russian-allied locals and that the russian command had decided not to risk confronting US air power.

[@Recceman901]

My Nephew was one of the Marines involved in this little spat. He said he only went through 1000 rounds on his 240.

[@sam8404]

How many rounds do they carry? I guess every person carries a little MG ammo so one guy doesn't have to carry it all.

[@gdup2009]

Lmao 1000 rds is a basic load. So he went black on ammo.

[@kota3233]

Worked for Conoco for years. You calling it conoco instead of conoco bothers me so much.

[@blacklake13]

It took a while to mention that the U.S. did not *want* to attack and/or electronically suppress Russian air defenses, as that would be an act of war. Until that point the video could come across as suggesting a fundamental inability to act due to the presence of the SAMs, when the real problem with regards to air access that night was deconfliction.

[@TheRezro]

Here is the thing. If Wagner would attack, it would be declaration of the war on US. Russia didn't have other option then disown them. Refusal would lead to real shit show.

[@selfworm]

"Battle of Khasham" is another name for this 2018 battle. The Der Spiegel report is called "American Fury: The Truth About the Russian Deaths in Syria" 5:18 "Special Forces Soldiers Reveal First Details of Battle With Russian Mercenaries in Syria" by The War Horse is the name of that May 2023 article.

[@Fuji_Echo]

I think it's more of minimizing escalation as the main factor in US forces not disabling Russia's anti-air systems rather than lacking the capability to

[@siosio6935]

It’s amazing how many conflicts our Country’s involved in at all times and most of them barely get any mentions

[@Shyhalu]

They get plenty of mention, just not in western media. Just look at the narrative spinning we saw during the election and over the Ukraine war. Half our country still doesn't know the Ukraine had 8 years of a civil war before Russia moved in.

[@myoak108]

We won't hear about several engagements until years after they happen, that's normal. You can compare this to current ukrainian special operation sabotage crews, we will not know where they are or what they're doing until it's done and dust settled.

[@smokeypuppy417]

There were no M2 Bradleys in Syria until 2020, most US vehicles outside the wire where MaTV's, older max pro mraps, LMTVs, and occasionaly up armored humvees, only the special forces/ state department drove toyota puck up trucks and suvs. There were some images of strykers also being used in Syria.

[@arunasmitrofanovas789]

Its fake news

[@kdawg9477]

​@@arunasmitrofanovas789someone is sad ruzzkie got wiре out by US 😂😂😂 even ruzzkie claimed it happen 😂

[@hawk9mm]

Yeah I don't get what Cappy is smoking.. it's been a known conflict, we know what our US forces used yet he's saying armored vehicles... I mean MRAPS fine LIGHT vehicles but not IFVs... I don't get why these KZbinr's try to sell themselves as genuine then have these bits of footage here and there that have nothing to do with the conflict or show vastly different units than was really there.

[@ghostly6175]

​​​​@@hawk9mmat 7:55 he says .50 cal machine guns remotely controlled from their six armored vehicles, it is very likely he is talking about MRAP's using the CROWS system. Not heavily armored, but armored enough to stop rifle rounds

[@hawk9mm]

@@ghostly6175 Oh I'm aware but again kept showing IFVs and called them heavy armored vehicles. I get that they can stop rifle rounds but they are not stopping even a BMP round.

[@WorldlyBudget]

“Protecting the oil fields” i.e. *stealing the oil*

[@Rusborzoi]

Ты прав

[@rjs69]

​@@RusborzoiRussia are experts at theft.

[@zedwpd]

As a Mission Crew Commander Air Battle Manager on AWACS, we could have shut down the air defense if we wanted to.

[@humansvd3269]

I was a CDMT and flew two deployments there. Yes we could have but would we really want to get into a bigger spat with Russia over Syria?

[@santannamv]

stories told by north-americans are always like hollywood, although reality is always a tragedy for them

[@TheOpethOfMastodon]

​@@santannamvI'm sure your life is a tragedy.

[@obiwan6010]

@@santannamvYeah it’s a real tragedy for the Wagner that got atomised alright

[@jonspear5411]

Go ahead and start WW3

[@johnnycaps1]

Wow. Some of the chatter from the media touched on this but it was vague and usually somewhat obscure. This is a great summary of what essentially happened and what was going on behind the scene. Thank you for your work.

[@CakeofWisdom]

Probably didn't have a full picture then, and had no real reason to follow-up since nothing else happened.

[@gussie88bunny]

Heartily agree, informative and entertaining. Thank you.

[@SusCalvin]

At the time, it was known that Russia and the USA were both flying in syrian airspace. And that they both were doing some sort of weird dance around eachother to test eachothers limit without starting a full confrontation. The russian air force were taking part in the string of brutal urban sieges the al-Assad regime was conducting to retake cities.

[@johnnycaps1]

@@SusCalvin Yep. That was my limited understanding at the time... It may also have been the media's limited understanding of it at the time.

[@SusCalvin]

@@johnnycaps1 I think the sieges of much larger urban centers stole much of the attention. There was no US no-fly zone over the entire syrian territory, and al-Assad seemed fine with pushing back different rebel pockets with outside help from Iran, Russia and Hezbollah. An oil field is pretty important but large pockets of rebels holding a big city like Homs or Aleppo is more important. In the EU, refugees became the big news as the war kept going year after year. It didn't start right off, I think it wore on over a period of years.

[@affemitwaffe2696]

Perhaps the Russian Ministry of Defense really did not know about Wagner's plans and was convinced that there were no Russians on the ground

[@abigfish1620]

Yeah, it was dependant upon russia turning off their air defense, however, that was more diplomatic than a tactical necesity. We could easily have taken out their air defense if we had to but just didnt want to spark a war with the russians.

[@BtappinHD]

Just like they didn't want to spark a war with the U.S. by shooting down their aircraft to defend PMC, which is why they turned them off.

[@lllPlatinumlll]

You don't know that. You make it sound like American troops are never sacrificed in battle, there are countless examples.

[@googlebackup-ll8fr]

chris said that if air defense wasnt turned off then the ships would have unleashed huge missiles. Had the t-72 gotten close enough, USA would have done that combined arms is a beautiful display of military ingenuity

[@BtappinHD]

@@googlebackup-ll8fr Then the missiles would've gotten shot down by air defense

[@googlebackup-ll8fr]

@@BtappinHD depends on how many ru willing to fire to overwhelm the air defense every manned aerial vehicle that gets shot down is a national mourning event, while most will applaud that u spent 2 billion USD worth of missiles to save our 30 boys from 300 merc ruskies

[@at1970]

The bush 2 administration is the gift that just keeps giving.

[@Rafael-up2hp]

Let me fix that title for you "How US Air Support Smoked Wagner Mercs in Syria"

[@titaniumskunkogkush4365]

You want a good whataboutism counter argument? Just look what's happening in Ukraine to western mercs. It's funny how you people brag and are entertained about old glorious war stories taking on weak opponents.

[@skellurip]

i think "how united states military waged illegal incursion into Syria" is more appropriate

[@DriveCarToBar]

30 Special Forces operators plus some REALLY vengeful air cover lol. 500 on 30 would have usually resulted in a loss for the 30, but America doesn't fight that old school way anymore. It's 500 vs 30 + 64 + 130 + 15. And by 64, 130 and 15, I mean AH-64, AC-130 and F15. Fuck yo fair fight!! and my guess is the US told Russia they were coming in anyway. Apaches are much more vulnerable to Russian anti-air than higher flying, faster jets. F15s and F22s would have had to destroy the anti-air first before the Apaches could move in, which would have slowed the response. This is probably what the Russians realized would happen. Since the Russians were telling the USA the forces attacking the oil refinery weren't Russian, they had to decide whether or not to keep the air defense on or risk having it all destroyed by the USAF and a large Army and Marine Corps counter assault. As we learned in Ukraine a few years later, Russian T-72s pop like a shaken up beer can when hit with a Javelin. Those tanks wouldn't have lasted long at all once the QRF force arrived with heavier weapons. But the Russians did the smart thing, and turned off their S300s. Which enabled the USAF and Army to absolutely wreck shit from the air. Also telling just how little value Russia places on infantry, especially when its not their infantry. They turned off their air defense and allowed their allies and their own PMCs to get brutalized, rather than call them back from the fight.

[@romanzusman2892]

They allowed it cause they don't give a flying f''k, they have plenty of cannon fodder plus military command was jealous of PMC' s success and freedom of operation, so they not just turned off the AA batteries, but also hadn't radioed PMC's commander telling him that they were in the battle with US SFs and not some poor kurds. That was made deliberately and Prigozhin said that at least twice, blaming military for this catastrophe

[@SusCalvin]

The official story from the russian MoD in the days following this was denial. They kept denying that these dudes had been sent by them.

[@harryamos7869]

Definitely earned my like. Excellent work, interesting, well researched and laid out in an concise and engaging way so that anyone can understand and take in the whole story, background and all. All of your stuff is good. This was some of your best work. I feel like I learned lot.

[@IbiEntertainment]

This fit nicely that US will loose if it comes war against Russia 🇷🇺 in weeks no doubt.

[@Ringoroadagain6]

Foreign mercenaries have no chances against an organized military with air support.

[@ViktoriousDead]

The SOF us troops were rangers, my buddy I was in Ranger regiment with was part of the platoon that got into contact with them

[@seanbrazell7095]

Wagnerserinian Obliteration. Your motivation breakdown makes sense. You didn't mention it in this vid,, but Wagner has made similar moves in Africa where it's seized or been "given" gold (and diamond, I think) mines.

[@RockyAlajoki]

A large part of their "bad aim" would most likely be their trying to maintain the asset. If they damaged the facility they would need to REPAIR the facility, they most likely wanted to scare them away and make them abandon the facility intact.

[@LoveHammerMan]

That's right baby😘 Tell yourself whatever you need to in order to cope

[@djgenius626]

Great job dude, yourr commentary is flawless

[@justkev6277]

Interesting to hear the full story behind this incident. Always just heard the over simplified "Russians attacked and got blown to bits" version.

[@CloneDAnon]

This story is bunch of BS exaggerated and spun completely. A bunch of Syrian light infantry (and their Russian instructors) were thinking they were clearing similar ISIS light infantry and got attacked instead by US attack helos and drones. So strong. I mean i understand that US simply steals Syrian land and oil, but then they pretend they get some major victory by massacring some light infantry who were equipped to fight only a similar lightly armed foe? Yikes. The casualties were not even 200, that is just a rounded propaganda number.

[@IbiEntertainment]

This fit nicely that US will loose if it comes war against Russia 🇷🇺 in weeks no doubt.

[@askhatsakebaev221]

Find any differences between Wagners "protecting" mining spots in Africa and US forces in Syrian "protecting" oil refinery...

[@maksimfedoryak]

Ahhhh, USA government does it directly, while Wagner is gray zone company, which allows ruzzian medias to broadcast message about bAd wEztErN cOloNiZatorZ on whole world?🤔

[@SusCalvin]

The local kurds benefit a lot more from the US presence and practically hosted the US forces, and kept a lot more economic control.

[@blank4227]

@@SusCalvin and the local africans benefit a lot more from wagner presence and practically host the russian forces, and kept a lot more economic control hahaha

[@SusCalvin]

@@blank4227 I think it's pretty open between them that Wagner and others gets paid in resource concessions where another part of the Wagner companies set up and extracts. A lot of his business empire was civilian industries, restaurants and stuff. The seem to negotiate where and how much they can grab.

[@blank4227]

@@SusCalvin sounds good to me

[@bigytv8392]

Hey Chris, your statement that Russki turned off their air defense batteries is an understatement. Let's just say someone helped them make the right choice.

[@TheNihiliant]

"Someone" ? Was it Captain America, who gave them no choice? xD Cmon, bud, the Yanks arent some demigods and the Ruskies wont be bullied by anyone, as we are seeing ;)

[@ihmpall]

@@TheNihiliantright now they are being bullied hard by a small country with some spare us weapons. You don’t want to imagine what us forces would do to Russians

[@nischuma6910]

@@ihmpall pls watch less CNN 🤦‍♂

[@bigytv8392]

@@TheNihiliant nope, Capt. America was not involved this time, but in his report Cappy did not mention additional air assets deployed in the area. Besides, C400 /S400 is a piece of garbage as shown multiple times by the Israel air force. Russia is unable to build plumbing/sewage systems, most of the population literally uses sh1thole outhouses, do you think they are able to build anything remotely comparable to modern ADA systems, lol.

[@RallanDOG]

​@nischuma6910 go ahead and educate yourself on the power and versatility of the US Navy and Air Force alone compared to the Russian equivalent. They're not even in our food chain

[@HevyGee]

I earned a BA in History, and an MA in Geography: in a realm where any "schlub" is free to share whatever they wish, your analytics ring true, they are rich in logic & facts, and they consistently pan out with resonant, integrative information! Kudos❤

[@goatofdeath]

I had watched other videos about this and none of them mentioned that the Russian military intentionally turned off their air defenses to let the Americans do their thing. That's a pretty hugely significant detail, that the fury of American air power was still held in initial check by air defense. Though I also don't envy a bunch of irregular forces engaging US Special Ops troops, even without air support.

[@longforgotten4823]

I wouldn’t say Held and check by the air defense systems. I would say, held in check by global Geo political agreements. If the United States wanted, those air defenses would’ve been turned off. Just one of those aircraft in the sky have the power to target and eliminate those systems.

[@patverum9051]

That air defence could have been wiped out in 30 minutes, at the risk of a direct russian-american confrontation.

[@ffs_999]

@@patverum9051 🤣🤣🤣🤣 pendosnya wet dreams

[@PoisoNouS_2326]

@@patverum9051 bro you dreaming or what US us to scare of Russia Air defense that why they requested it to be turn off

[@ekoflow77]

@@patverum9051Even if the U.S could take it out how in the world did you come to the conclusion they could do it in 30mins. You know where you got that? You got it out of illusion. You made it up so it’s not true.

[@StevenStarksjbirdcapitalllc]

I remember this event being mentioned in the news. Russia was well aware of how devastating US power was against their troops and those batteries would have been destroyed. We came close to a world war when this event occurred.

[@GrasticInternational]

Air power for Ukraine is months away so, rockets, drones, EW and sabotoge is their only play. Glad you pointed out that air power is survival. Ukraine is in a hole right now.

[@klaabu99]

in ukrain problem is not planes or tanks or artillery ... problem is that ukrainians are too smart and don't need others advice

[@GrasticInternational]

​Since they don't have the air power yet saying "it's not a problem" for Ukraine misses the point. Conoco was a smaller force holding off a larger one w/air power.

[@KatarinaBohtana]

@@klaabu99 For the counter offensive it totally is a problem though.

[@jbarsoopastar4131]

Ukraine is not getting F-16's nor long range misses. The USA is not giving Ukraine our most advanced weapon systems. Fist who gonna fly the jets? It takes years to become a capable pilot to fly plus be able to utilize all the high tech. The tech in the jets are highly classified secrets. Ukraine and some stateside dummy think America is just going to give it to Ukraine freely. Wow at a lost for words. Why not lend them a carrier to clean the Black Sea. That how porposterous this sounds.

[@TimostrategyGaming]

Those Marines were 100% helldivers

[@12pentaborane]

The mere mention of the aircraft involved brought a smile to my face. Quite the airshow.

[@IbiEntertainment]

This fit nicely that US will loose if it comes war against Russia 🇷🇺 in weeks no doubt.

[@Ikbeneengeit]

Thanks for explaining this complex and fascinating situation in a way I can understand. Great video 💯

[@DamirAsanov]

Very fascinating story of how US invaded Syria. And now crying about Russian invasion of Ukraine 😐

[@Caliell]

Having family member (obviously not going to mention his name due to what is going on) who worked for Wagner in Syria, while this wasn't just some sort of Prigozhin trying to take Conoco refinery. Russian MOD needed to test US response to their actions (this was constant dick measuring exercise if noted with later videos, where Russian and US soldiers clashing trying to cut off and T bone each other off the road or blocking each other patrols in Syria). Russian Top Brass wanted to see how far they can push the envelope in this stare off without taking casualties and who wasn't any better to send in to do that, that "The Security Guards for Oil Fields" to see what will happen? To make it look like it was "The Rogue Action", they mixed in The Musicians with SAA regulars, who provided the bulk of heavy armor for this assault. Funny thing, when the situation came to light in Russia this was the mixed response from the public ranging from "Theydontexist" to making fun of Russian Mercenries (at that time Mercenary work was viewed as relative taboo in Russian public - That changed with invasion of Ukraine and the spinning of PR campaign of Wagner become "The Defender of The Nation").

[@KatarinaBohtana]

Thanks for the insight. 👍

[@seekrengr751]

That makes much more sense than Cappy's "Prigozhin doing a resource grab" speculation. There's no way the capture of the refinery would have resulted in "business as usual but money going to Wagner" scenario. The refinery would have simply shut down and all the workers evacuated prior to Wagner moving in.

[@TheUmbralPresence]

So you're saying your family member, who was working for Wagner, knew what was in the minds of MOD heads. And that family member wasn't among the Wagner high command probably, so Prigozhin probably had even more information but still went for it. Interesting...

[@andersonandrighi4539]

There are less blood ways of assessing opposition power. That type of antics is the reason the top brass in the West considers Wagner group a mercenary group more than a PMC.

[@vincere_]

@@TheUmbralPresence Gossip is a thing.

[@tommytwotacos8106]

The B-52 was just a troll move. Somebody laughed when they realized that they had a buff they could include in their little care package.

[@deanschneider8775]

Do not underestimate the strategic value of the naval base at Tartus. Russia could not leave Syria alone. This is a recurring pattern in other countries, too. One that is somehow overlooked. A lot.

[@IbiEntertainment]

This fit nicely that US will loose if it comes war against Russia 🇷🇺 in weeks no doubt.

[@Shyhalu]

We can't leave other countries alone either, wtf are we even doing in Syria? Just looting oil.

[@darkeve5917]

​@@Shyhalu a proof that geopolitics isn't for everyone to understand is people like you. You should stop participating in discussions not meant for kid level thinking capacity

[@Shyhalu]

@@darkeve5917 I like how you didn't explain how I am wrong or wtf the USA is doing in Syria. Do you even remember why we were told we were invading? The irony in your post is palpable. But go ahead, tell me "hurr durrz dey hatez our freedomz!"

[@sagitarriulus9773]

😂😂😂 I’m here thinking that after all the air attacks they encountered the b52 slowly making its way to the battle field to finish them off is just hilarious. Imagine a lull in the battle pure silence with the faint sound of b52 props 😂😂😂

[@onegemini420]

Small correction, the B-52 does not use props. It uses jet engines and those make a very different sound than prop planes.

[@sospeteroddi7048]

😂

[@sagitarriulus9773]

@@onegemini420 low ominous humming jet sounds in the distance. Wagner troops 😧

[@pricelessppp]

A b52 is a Jet! 😂

[@onegemini420]

@@sagitarriulus9773 I bet you were thinking of the C-130 gunship. That does use props and you do not want to be on the receiving end of its cannons.

[@BrianFitzGerald-TheSkySurfer]

I love you, Bro, and have watched dozens of your movies and learned some things but Hey! I have NEVER heard Conoco pronounced "con-OH-co" before. It is accented on the first syllable thus: "CON-o-co". That concludes my speech lesson for the day.

[@arthurmiller-vl6sw]

Great analysis. My only complaint is Conoco is pronounced CoN-O-CO.

[@jackwalker9492]

Waah!

[@exactlywhatineeded]

No way, lmfao

[@kilohotel6750]

I laughed the first time he said it but what do you expect from your average infantry man. He does do good videos though. As a Marine I always like to watch his videos with a fresh box of crayons and a beer.

[@robtorres5518]

😂 kaa·nuh·kow Got me too

[@dalestark3343]

Always a good informative story from the T&P crew well done gentlemen, well done!

[@Thaidory]

I remember this as the Black Day on every Russian military. The amount of online outrage for Russian MOD turning off those AA was enough to power Moscow for several hours.

[@SusCalvin]

The news in Europe at the time didn't describe them as Wagner. Just that some sort of russian mercenaries and their local allies had been mauled trying to contest a US special forces troop, their own kurd allies and a lot of US fire support. The russian MoD kept denying it all and I thought the USA was happy enough they had learned their lesson. At the time I thought it showed the limit of what small PMC units can do alone when faced with a national force. Blackwater couldn't have done any better if they had been forced into the same role that day.

[@MatheusAraujo-lz2kt]

"And remember, no Russian"

[@timg4444]

In b4 Russian bots start saying Wagner is currently “stacking US bodies in Ukraine” lmfao

[@愛を込めてロシアから]

Nicholas Meyer, Pete Reed and many others send greetings

[@humansvd3269]

But Wagner took Bahkmut though, during the "counter offensive".

[@matts5247]

I always tell people bout this story it seems hard to believe that it wasn’t bigger news at the time and didn’t spark a bigger geopolitical incident.

[@matts5247]

Especially considering Wagner has always (until recently) been almost a subsidiary of the Russian armed forces rather than a completely separate entity like most western PMC’s.

[@piotrd.4850]

US asked Russia overhotline and Russia disowned the soldiers.

[@horrorfan117]

@@piotrd.4850 US: Hey we got a force attacking some of our guys. Are any of yours out there? Russia: No. US: ... See I know you're lying, but Imma make you tell the truth.

[@darthmaul8912]

Russia is for unknown reasons pretty cool about losing troops against illegal US invaders. Might be because the are not desperate enough to start WW3 (yet). In fact Russia got a revenche a couple months ago as they blew up a ukrainian command bunker packed which with NATO officers. Of course that never happend.😉 Can't wait to get this story declassified/leaked. They first time the US admitted that there are US troops operating in Syria was the day Trump announced to send them home. No wonder why they hate Trump.

[@OK-yy6qz]

Plausible deniability is a hell of an asset

[@morgansmit8564]

History by Cappie. I like! More please.

[@godsm3dic577]

They send 500 men and we send the whole damn military lmao. Sometimes we just don’t fuck around bro lol

[@ZT-vr4wz]

When America's goal is to spread evil, they never play around.

[@OriginalRizzler]

I feel like it's kind of weird that it wasn't mentioned once through all of this that the US military controls huge oil extraction operations in its occupied areas of Syria.

[@hoi-polloi1863]

I guess the question is who actually gets the oil. Is it the US Government or some US company, or is it the various Syrian rebels?

[@rgh622]

I'll go ahead and explain it to you. It's not weird, it's a beneficial position for the USA. Why mention the obvious? For example, is it helpful that I point out how naive your question is? All countries spend money on projects that will ultimately benefit them.

[@QuixEnd]

Yeah typically both countries communicate their plan ahead of time to avoid this from happening. Wagner keeps making the same mistake in Ukraine and ends up fighting Russia

[@kuvasz5252]

Kudos for this informative video. Rather than not over-extending forces, what steps are to be taken to protect ground troops in case air support is stifled like the initial few hours of that battle? Know what is sad, humans have been fighting over that small patch of land for 5,000 years.

[@IbiEntertainment]

This fit nicely that US will loose if it comes war against Russia 🇷🇺 in weeks no doubt.

[@healthdoc]

This is the third version of this encounter I’ve watched. No one tells a better more complete story than you do. 👍

[@jaymacpherson8167]

While “Conoco” may be pronounced differently in Syria, the company employees pronounce it as Con-o-co, not Co-no-co. I just couldn’t stand hearing it mispronounced so many times.

[@BrandanMickelson]

☝️this

[@reecemorreljr2690]

Continental Oil Company becomes Con - O - Co.

[@ckhebdon5788]

@@reecemorreljr2690 - Absolutely. It has been a US oil company for decades. Painful to hear it mispronounced.

[@tealsquare]

Wait when you go to South America and hear how they pronounce Jesus. Won't you suffer a stroke?

[@jaymacpherson8167]

@@tealsquare probably

[@jordanfromyt2861]

My question to all viewers after hearing his explanation, who’s the bad one between Wagner and the USA Army?

[@brianhowe1982]

Why were US troops in Syria? The Russians were invited by the Syrian government whether we like that government or not, Russia was invited by an actual authority, and America was actively supporting people that America would have considered "terrorists" if roles were reversed.

[@bmw335hdk2]

US military : Power Rangers Russia (wagner) : just one monster

[@kyjo72682]

Interesting. I heard about this incident before but I had no idea about the AD aspect of it. And it's a good point to bring attention to. What's weird though is that after the Russian army disabled their AD in the area they still let the PMG continue with the attack..

[@thepinkplushie]

Wagner has a very long leash. It's impossible the Russians weren't aware this operation was to take place but as far as US intelligence was able to find, it was entirely organized by Wagner and Iran

[@sam8404]

Plausible deniability.

[@kenricnarbrough8191]

RI.P Borodin. Unlike the members of a PMC he did not sign up for violence. Utterly shameful.

[@olefella7561]

This channel mastered narrating stories in a way that makes you feel you uncover the mystery yourself. Thank you!👏

[@IbiEntertainment]

This fit nicely that US will loose if it comes war against Russia 🇷🇺 in weeks no doubt.

[@docadams1]

Conoco is an American oil company, pronounced Ca-ni-co in Texas.

[@ericanderson8500]

Ok, I was wondering about the pronunciation😆 which sounded strange to me but is how it's supposed to be said?

[@hobblecreekcraftsman]

@@ericanderson8500 @docadams1 has it right. Conoco is an American oil company and the correct pronunciation is indeed, 'Cah-ni-co'.

[@marcelo.grohmann]

Great video. Keep up the good work. 👍👍👍

[@user-zx7eo7nu4b]

All I learned from this video is that Russian ground to air defense would’ve destroyed our forces, had they not disabled them.

[@TheOpethOfMastodon]

Potentially

[@tobim5574]

No. Because the US has the capacity to neutralise those aging aa, however Russia is obligated by international law like everyone else to turn it off at the request of a foreign nation if they are not in use protecting their own Armed forces. So in short, no. They would have been legally able to destroy them

[@user-zx7eo7nu4b]

@@tobim5574 if that was the case why couldn’t they “ neutralize” them before they were turned off? 🤔 💭

[@gavinlightfoot5521]

​@@user-zx7eo7nu4bbecause they didn't want to escalate an easily avoidable situation.

[@user-zx7eo7nu4b]

@@gavinlightfoot5521 these answers you people are giving makes totally no sense. If that was the case, they wouldn’t be destroying NATO equipment like it’s yesterday’s trash right now in Ukraine. If the United States went to war with Russia, we would get our ass stomped right now.