Why you SHOULDN'T trust me

[@crimsonb.6013]

Crinacle: *makes a whole video telling you not to trust him* me: I trust this man with my life.

[@MrUfui92]

With my ears for me

[@bluephreakr]

See this is what scares me. I tell my friends two things: 1) *I'm a dumb ass.* 2) Don't trust me with your life Next thing I know, all of my friends not only disregard I am a dumb ass, but they also trust me with their life. _I am asking them to be skeptical and to disregard me as an absolute source of information_ yet there they are, on their heels with tongue hanging out waiting to be spoon-fed more information. _What the fuck is wrong with them?!_ I can, _so very easily_ exhibit some knowledge, tell people _Oh no no no no no you don't trust me with that, please verify all I say_ then literally get away with lying to their face. Don't fall for that!

[@33blue]

​@@bluephreakr Personally, I believe their behavior could be explained by the tendency of some to find people who provide the full answer, that is, the information itself and the disclaimer that it may be inaccurate, incomplete, or false, to be more trustworthy than those who always provide answers as facts without the disclaimers.

[@carl4243]

@@bluephreakr How do you think countries work huh?

[@hoobidibahbidibah8119]

One who admits that they may be wrong, and is transparent about biases or where knowledge is lacking, builds rapport and empathy as it shows they're willing to own up to mistakes. Also adds a bit of assurance that if they're wrong they're willing to try correcting themselves alongside you.

[@davidlaurence3744]

Perfectly put Crin.

[@mndlessdrwer]

The idea of a brand thinking that blacklisting Crinacle would be a good idea is hilarious. So you want to remove your products from review by one of if not THE most comprehensive reviewers on the planet? So you want to ensure that he's not going to cover any potentially good products you make in the future? So you want to make sure that all of the many thousands of people who turn to his site and forum pages won't see your products at all. By pulling support you are removing your products from public spotlight. Good job, you just detracted heavily from any potential marketing his reviews could have done for you in the future.

[@KayMacheen]

I like the Crinicle Villain Arc.

[@raiedr]

Everything is cake, including Crin

[@GadZookz]

A Dioko repair kit arrived Friday. Guess what’s coming next. I own the Dusk, Midnight, Eclipse and Timeless already so a well tuned Dioko is required. But a DIY solution is not for everyone. Shouldn’t 7Hz provide full replacements to those who request them.

[@crin]

If you were one of the initial 150+ that were affected and put in a request for either a refund or exchange, you should have been accommodated (assuming you purchased from Linsoul or Mecha because I don't have any control over other resellers). If not, give me your order number and I'll have it set right.

[@GadZookz]

@@crin Did you get my order number OK?

[@GadZookz]

@@crin Dioko arrived yesterday. Impressive build quality and good accessories for the price. This set sounds great so unless I have a tin ear, this one has the right filters. Good job Crinacle! 👍🏻

[@brokenpropfpv8917]

Im from the past

[@why_tho_]

Literally lmao

[@KEN-tf9sr]

HOW TF

[@aghostofthepast]

Patron moment

[@brokenpropfpv8917]

@@aghostofthepast *Certified discord booster moment*

[@oscarcacnio8418]

Very much so.

[@badseedtech]

Boss move. Shame it has to be said at all, but it really does.

[@SpikeyTech]

I agree with the sentiment, but you're also the same guy that said "[the switches] were sent out by Zeal... [but that] doesn't affect my opinion in any way". Acknowledging bias then attempting to correct it is one thing, but acknowledging bias to simply dismiss it with "doesn't affect me" is just bad practice in my opinion. Source: kzbin.info/www/bejne/faa6mWusqNWZebs

[@michaelmacvittie6977]

@@SpikeyTech I’m not sure what your complaint is here. He disclosed that the switches given to him for free, as well as saying the fact they’re free wouldn’t affect any opinions he has about the switches. Ya know, like every good reviewer does.

[@rev8962]

It is indeed such a boss move.

[@SpikeyTech]

@@michaelmacvittie6977 What I'm saying is that I feel like he got half of the formula "right". Part 1 is acknowledging bias / conflicts of interest, and 2 is mitigating those. Simply stating that something doesn't affect your opinion does not make that the case. If I were to start a YT channel myself, I would probably take after Linus' approach to sponsors: prefer sponsors that are completely unrelated to the content in question, OR make a clear distinction between a "sponsored showcase" (which is more akin to an ad) and a "review" (where the product in question is purchased by them). Although I personally agree with Linus' approach, I understand that this is still a hotly debated topic. It's also worth noting that while I have thoughts on the topic myself, I'm not exactly an expert myself; I'm just a random dude on the internet.

[@michaelmacvittie6977]

@@SpikeyTech companies send things to people for review all the time. It’s not a sponsorship. Crinacle even talks about this in the video you commented on that you apparently didn’t pay attention to. Like Crinacle said, unless you wanna spend tens of thousands of dollars a year reviewing everything, you accept these offers with conditions. If the company in question doesn’t agree to your conditions, then you politely and professionally tell them no.

[@RainbowSun0529]

For anyone who join the audiophile hobby. Trust nothing but your EARS. Crin is a good source when you have no idea what to looking for. But once you have something in your mind, always find a way to do the audition, never blind buy.

[@LoganRas]

This. Also, check multiple reviews and ask questions on forum pages. And yes, try to listen to the product somewhere first (audio stores are dying for you business).

[@carl4243]

Sadly I have to blind buy as there are no Audio store near me but at least I got no buyers remorse for now (bought them online) as I enjoy my audio equipment that I currently have.

[@danielp121]

@@carl4243 same...I need to travel 2-2.5 hrs. to the audio store that offers demoing of units. AND that's the nearest store 😂 If I didn't like the item, I just post it online and wait for a buyer 🤷🏽‍♂️

[@magicscreengames4353]

@@LoganRas check multiple reviews and ask questions on forum pages - and become completely confused

[@OcDmn]

i trusted my wallet more, lol. when my wallet said it's bad, no matter what my ear said of the quality i still won't get it.

[@PhantomGett]

The fact that you give enough of a shit about your own reputation to actually list out all of this in a video disclaimer, is the reason I respect your content and effort so much.

[@why_tho_]

Damn, you actually have TLDW in case it gets tedious to watch the whole sections of the video. That's really awesome.

[@sexntuna]

What does tldw stand for? Too long didnt watch?

[@why_tho_]

@@sexntuna yes

[@shivansh7152]

Damn I just watched a 12 minute disclaimer and enjoyed it...

[@ClavaLad]

I mean it was quite enjoyable

[@pvshka]

It's just one of those things that should be said once in a while.

[@zerousen]

do not listen to this man

[@sonickiller360]

9:58 Z Reviews called out. Oof.

[@ivaylomanev6882]

Does Zeos feel the burn :))) 10:01

[@JamieVatarga]

10:01 oof, that's a direct shot. Lol

[@luminusprotect]

tea?

[@ssnjr1299]

who?

[@aniketverma4580]

Z reviews cough** cough****

[@rampari]

Not to be the simp in the room , but it's quite rare to see this level of disclosure or openess from most review channels let alone specifically audio reviews

[@ryuno2097]

it's okay bro, whether Crin likes it or not. He will have simps. lel

[@Softieissoft]

Hm selling review units at auction, sounds familiar Z Reviews tag

[@JaredClarkBoaz]

The call out at 10:00 got me good 😂

[@karaalaa9419]

@Zreviews

[@esbenrasmussen4289]

Here is how I see it. A YT review channel knows their most valuable asset is their audience, that is what gives them value in the eyes of manufacturers. This value only persists if the audience have trust in the honesty of reviews. The only "problem" I can see arising is that there is probably a difference between the experience of using a product that you paid 300 USD for, and having it given to you for "free" (It is not for free, because the YTer has to spend X amount of hours on the video) But seeing as we are influenced by things like sunk cost fallacy and those things, I tend to believe that a "free" product gets a more fair treatment and avoids the emotional pressure to experience it as being better than it is. Just look at monster cable OFC pure copper snakeoil products

[@alexossan2829]

"...which should be the reason you're watching this video now." Actually I'm watching this video because I've trusted you and placed my order and there's nothing to do except wait but you know that feeling when you've made your decision and placed your order but you keep looking up more reviews and related videos even though you don't need more information anymore and you know it but you just can't stop yourself from looking at more videos or even videos you've already watched that talk about the items you ordered...Gosh there must be a word to describe this. I need to know that word.

[@a689c4]

the ad read in a discourse, legend.

[@logiclygodless]

1) I got the zex pro/crn to see if your subjectivity alligns with mine. it does. 2) Got the Timeless on your review 3) same with the Aria's based on the charts 4) keep doing what you are doing and 5) Wow Zeos shade... but I do agree

[@jubayerwasidraiyan5874]

would you say that one starts to see diminishing returns when comparing the aria and the timeless?

[@kimberly_lippington]

im considering to upgrade from aria to timeless, is it worth it?

[@dagnisnierlins188]

@@kimberly_lippington eq them first, then decide if something is still missing from your current set.

[@gwynbleiddroach2589]

@@jubayerwasidraiyan5874 I would say you start to see diminishing g returns once you hit the 500-600 dollar range.

[@300y1]

@@gwynbleiddroach2589 no way. Even headphones taper off in quality at the 200 dollar threshold. Iems are around the same.

[@bostonman5992]

I hope sponsors and companies back up truck loads of cash to your home in the future. I dig your videos, I actually agree with most of them and have somewhat the same tuning taste. I just don’t nerd out like you do, hence why I rely on your vast nerd ability to review IEMs for me. Keep being Crin!

[@pootisspencer5492]

“Anyone who sells review units, whether directly or by AUCTION, you are a scumbag” hmm

[@dapperbrick7516]

🤔

[@Belemrys]

That hit different...

[@PhoggHawk]

Wow that was a burn! I never had a problem with this practice before this but I guess we should probably assume that these reviewers are not pals now. I suppose that also means that if you bid on these items Crin is insinuating that you are supporting or being complicit in scumbaggery? I don't know if I agree with that and I thought it was a low blow, which is sure to make an impact on the livelihood of the unnamed reviewer who does this due to the fact that so many people take the word of Crinacle as gospel. That's a shame because I am a fan of both reviewers. This all leaves a bad taste in my mouth, to be honest. I really don't think that was necessary. I don't want to see factions set up on either side. That would spoil the audiophile community and that's a real shame. I hope it doesn't happen. But it is out there now and it can't be taken back.

[@Whyamibzsdmh]

I don't trust anyone. I try out headphones and amps in stores and I've never been happier.

[@andrewcairnsmrkiplin]

ive watched reviews and bought a couple of items before and not liked the sound at all even though the review sounded like the sound i was after.

[@foxgaming76yt24]

@@andrewcairnsmrkiplin The main issue is that all the terms that "audiophiles" use vary in definition between people

[@BraxtonMeyer]

What are you doing here then?

[@ReinoldFZ]

Ugh, I wouldn't go to your shows with your earwax 🤮

[@Whyamibzsdmh]

@@BraxtonMeyer I still like to keep up with the industry. People who run shops follow the same trends as everybody else so why wouldn't I.

[@jokroast6912]

Its OK crin I already do not trust KZbinrs.

[@crazygreek6341]

Crin: It's disclaimer time

[@mndlessdrwer]

The main reason I trust Crinacle's reviews is because his tuning preferences largely mirror my own, though his ability to tolerate treble is still greater than my own, so the availability of graphs to further refine things is much appreciated. My most recent experience of purchasing largely due to graphs was the AKG K371, which he ranks as B on his comparison chart. I think that is a pretty fair assessment for the majority of people, as the treble does die off just a little bit prematurely unless you're treble sensitive like I am, in which case it's perfectly fine. You can't always buy based on graphs, because sometimes things end up sounding a bit different compared to how they graph, either due to your ears being weird or because the unit used to graph on isn't ideally suited for a particular unit. For example, particular headphones with giant ear cups can prove difficult to get a seal on freestanding ear analogues and require a full HATS unit to get situated properly. But, for the vast majority of people whose hearing is about average, the ear analogue testers are perfectly adequate as guidance for how something will sound. And, in my case, the Harmon tuning guide is well suited for gauging the maximum amount of treble that I can tolerate in a set. As such, the fact that this and other similar tuning guides are his preference make it quite easy to utilize Crin's reviews and grading to select earphones and headphones to listen to.

[@totempolejoe1]

One hypothetical issue with review units that I'm surprised you didn't touch upon is the idea that such units will be "bespoke" or otherwise gussied up by the manufacturers to be the best possible representations of their products. If I was a hardware manufacturer sending out review units, I would understandably feel compelled to make sure that those review units aren't hampered by obvious QC issues or other errors. But shadier companies may send out review units that either don't represent the product sold to consumers at all or are a front for an outright scam. Buying the unit "off the shelf" so to speak with one's own money bypasses this problem entirely--however, as you point out, not everybody has the money or the free time to do this. It works better for some things than others, too: TheReportOfTheWeek can readily pay for fast food items to review because they're fairly affordable, but someone reviewing newly released cars would need to either be obscenely wealthy or use review units. I'd say someone in your position needs review units not just because of the costs involved otherwise but because the extremely competitive market segment means tons of new products come out every year.

[@naunau311]

Talking out of my ass here so feel free to check but I'm pretty sure there are laws against that

[@hermesjr.branzuela5271]

Eyepatch Crin is not real. Clickbait thumbnail. Wasted 11:40 of my life😭

[@tommyng403]

Bumped into crin when I collected my dioko. Cool dude and very careful with his words. Waiting for your next collaboration

[@Levdrekinn]

If Campfire wanted to collab with Crin', he'd be like "well look who came crawling back". >:)

[@cristroman100]

I remember something similar on your previous channel. It's a good reminder about some KZbin channel motives. TL;DR don't hold Crin's words as gospel

[@davidcoons89]

Shots fired at the 10:00 mark! 🤷🏼‍♂️😂

[@RaphaelStarr]

Where's the "Subscribe again" button. This level of transparency is so rare. Thank you.

[@georgemas]

Fun fact : we are all from the future

[@trellusg]

I still trust your reviews are what they’re always been - your honest opinion, which is sometimes “brutally honest.” 😅 I love you for that. Keep up the good work.

[@terlaluanjay]

*its crinacle time*

[@hamedshahr]

10:00 * cough * ZeosPantera * cough *

[@Kentololable]

Makes me wonder if they're still friends after that.

[@ante8247]

Would you be willing to make a separate tier list that is exclusive to your collaboration products?

[@Collin_J]

Yeah the "review unit" is certainly problematic amongst smaller creators and big manufacturers (ex being Nvidia and Hardware Unboxed), but to me Crin has such a monopoly on the (English-speaking) high-end audio reviews that electing to not send him a sample means so little to him. IIRC he's borrowed high-end products in the past, or just used his own money when something was relevant and he wanted to review it. I am much too gullible to not trust Crin.

[@PeteManabat]

Tried out your crinacle x kz and loved the tuning. I think the fit could be more generic so it could fit more ears better.

[@DomiaAbrWyrda]

So many respects to you Crin for making this as fair as possible

[@zxyonrhysivz]

Thanks for being a genuine reviewer who's focus on reviewing while maintaining his integrity.

[@dnzch]

Ahhh now i see the description

[@Sherolox]

Project Mongrel... A graph for that was already discovered. How very interesting. And now Project Genesis? That one's not even listed here. Unless that's not one of Crin's projects.

[@risyadr]

where can i see the graph?

[@Sherolox]

@@risyadr Graph Comparison Tool.

[@markallen6317]

Is there any value to you in reversing your process, working with source device manufacturers to compose a 3 dimensional tuning spreadsheet wherein z=f(x)=(xy) [(y=IEMs, x=source audio units)]? Why? Say I buy a Hiby source. I want easy, preset sound settings optimizing the acoustic synergy between the DAP source and whatever IEMs I possess. Unitless, z=(optimal IEMs)(optimal tuning) for a given DAP that's gone through its own tuning against my IEM(s). The end GUI is a list in the DAP's online user's manual of IEMs and you tap your IEM to activate the tuning algorithm, optimizing the settings of my DAP with my IEMs. Sort this out and I'll forever trust you.

[@singularety]

Ouch, Zeos the gauntlet has been thrown...

[@thierryfaquet7405]

Missile barrage toward Z 🤣

[@oliverkky]

Crinacle's disclamer before his ranking list: "but don’t take it as gospel" Me: I will indeed take it as gospel

[@housepianist]

You're right Crin when you say the key is to be objective when reviewing. However, what users want - whether they admit it or not- is subjectivity, especially if it lines up with the subjective opinion of a reviewer. Unfortunately, as much as reviewers of any product want to be objective, the question that shatters that notion, especially with headphones/IEMs, is: "How do they sound?" This is the so-called "money shot" in this industry. That's what people want to know. And if what you think aligns with what someone else thinks, great. If not, inevitable destruction and dispair will ensue. Trust me, this is more of how our society is than some mindless preferences and differences in sound.

[@glitch1449]

I'm from the present ........

[@alkaAdeluxx]

you are a nice guy ty

[@Slambear]

LMFAOOOOOOOOOO, im just watching this and when said “anyone who sells review units, directly or by auction, you’re a scum bag.” I immediately thought of LTT😂😂😂

[@Anos.Voldigoad]

I trust this Man, bought Dioko blindly immediately after that video ad he did and it’s expected to arrive tomorrow so I’m hyped asf!

[@noncog1]

Let us know what you think

[@Anos.Voldigoad]

@noncog1 will do as soon as I have it in my hands! Been hearing nothing but praises so far from people I know who were lucky enough to audition them

[@priejonas83]

Not impactiful bass , weird treble , really dont like this,The s12 is much better

[@hamzasaeed918]

Crinacle coming out with Doug Demuro level of thumbnails

[@user-et4pf]

I'd say forget reviewing, it is a thankless job anyway. Get connected to multiple brands and go beyond collabs, get right into the tuning with the audio engineers and get into some heated arguments like a proper artist. I think you would find it far more rewarding to create than to critique. And when collabs go bad, well, it will be a funny video to review that, and see it as an opportunity to do better next time.

[@CloudPixel]

I love the transparency of the video but I do wonder about the whole interrupting the flow of the video bit. Does that mean this video is just going to be slapped in the description of videos and never mentioned in the actual video again for the most part? Or how would that work? Idk. Or is it going to be part of the outro now so people know that the disclaimer video exists. This comment might not make sense. But anyways thanks for the video!

[@HiFilurar]

Now you also made the perfect disclaimer video. Is it something you can't do, uncle Crin?

[@darealfredster]

I just got your KZ x Crinacle IEM's and I do like them a lot

[@klannstyle]

This is the first clip of your's that i see. I don't know what your content and if you are a person with bad interest for the viewer or good one. But, from my pov, you shouldn't use at any phrase in my opinion or anything else. Also, you don't need to make minutes of disclaimer... You can use 2-3 sec at top, with text that say what butterflies need to know. I don't like and also don't watch people that repeat more than twice a thing that's almost useless in that repetition, but doing for "legal" reasons, meaning they are forced by the law to say it otherwise the same buterflies from above can claim w/e bs they think. Regarding colaborations, as long you are honest (in your opinion ofc .😀 ) and also admit when things goes south then ppl should understand. The best example now is with big youtubers that were promoting _Established Titles_, are facing an alleged scam. Should they be doing a proper bg check, yes, should they be also human? Also, yes. This is when you do hundred of things and you also don't have time to bg check 100h of each individual bussiness offer you get. That means, we as humans we have this moments too, when we fail to see the truth behind. So, at the end, if we admit that we were wrong, it should be fine. BUUUT... not regarding big and offending scams. Like, crypto ponzi scams, or just ponzy schemes where all thing are hidden and all other overhyped things that are more complex than nasa data sheets. You understand wt i mean. At the end, people should have their brain on and also active will all neurons. We make the final decision and if we make it 100% biased, then more than 80-90% is the buyers fault. So many times the bad things are seeing from the title, or maybe from the too real to be truth promises and that's a frist glimpse of the potential scam. You also should have the power to say a product is bad, even if you have a long time colaboration... no matter what. If you find flaws in that product you must be able to say about them. I understand that you might not need to over hype that, but you must address it. And if the company is a good one will understand that, assume that fault and repair it as soon as they can. No matter the contract. You are a youtuber not their employee. Period. And as you already said, if that product / service is proved to be bad at some later point from who knows what, or unf. a scam... so be it. You can't go back and next time will pay more and more attention. That how things goes in life. I remember PewDiePie having some issues with his collabs at some time, also doing bad things in other ppl opinion, he addressed them, said sorry and moved on. But he also didn't scammed anyone (from my knowledge), otherwise he wouldn't be here as he is. Right? Now i go to watch some of your videos 😁 Cheers!

[@WhiteMaxBlake]

The end "Just Don't Die .. F*** Off" --- lmao --- crin is bad ass...

[@oakley6889]

So much respect for your opinions, if you say something is terrible objectively, its out of my head, if you say its good ill look into it more. also you said youtube kids, and a childs mobile game banner popped up

[@p_serdiuk]

Here is a quick suggestion. Rank your IEMs among themselves. Maybe with a simpler ranking system that doesn't correspond to the main rankings. It would be interesting to know which of your collabs you would recommend for which use cases.

[@tonylee1667]

That is a bad idea

[@MillerTM]

Just put them on the Ranking list as "U" for unranked, no ratings, just information about the driver setup, tuning and a link to the Frequency graphs.

[@p_serdiuk]

Hey, Pitt van de Vitt is your patron. Now even your EQ videos are sus because you are technically supported by the author of Wavelet xD

[@tanishpatil9262]

Bruh still waiting on that top IEMs under 50 dollars, which you said u planned on doing 3 months ago.....

[@JonLaRue]

IMO review units = just as likely to trash as like because with buying something there's a natural confirmation bias upon purchase and wanting it to be good.

[@bhagat_metaphor]

Brother can you suggest me 1out of these options kz zsn pro x,kz ZDX ultra, cca cra+ ,kz ZDX pro

[@STAYCBias]

Can you help me find the world's best affordable DAP and a phone that sounds exceptionally good?

[@hibikiholmes2867]

I was confused by the thumbnail 'cause I read it as "Collab Free, Sponsor Bies".

[@cesarpensado2959]

If you rank your Collab products, i'll completly Trust you

[@trocadero1965]

Interests €$€¥¢💴💰💸💷💶 💵🤑🔊. You need to read between the brackets though

[@jafizzle95]

Shots fired at [a reviewer in my recommended bar on this video].

[@jordanwadley]

Nothing but respect for you and this video man. Your honesty is greatly appreciated

[@Nick-Iles]

Getting a sponsor on a sponsor disclosure video is some galaxy-brain stuff.

[@gorebrush]

Nice Marc Rebillet music. Love loopdaddy.

[@tomkraayenbrink8522]

It took me way too long to hear the Marc Rebillet BG music.

[@trumpetmasta92]

Thinking about getting some Dusk and this video just helped me make that buy. Thanks Crin

[@djmaxtrim]

10:01 Sadly but "Alphabet" Reviews does it...

[@kaifmohammed9398]

all i have to say about this you are a G.O.A.T

[@TeamOT]

"... as adults. Stupid adults, but adults nonetheless."

[@richboii6597]

Damn he said Zeos yard sale is scum bag 😂

[@BLTxheal]

I trust my ears with your reviews; I bought my dad a koss ksc 75 and he loves them

[@mmenendezg]

*me after watch the video:* I have to SUBSCRIBEEEEE

[@easternlethal]

I think you mean 'disclose' - not 'disclaim'..

[@xeno4162]

Pretty based video

[@FrozenFingers]

I do know and try my best in accepting that reviews are to some degree biased with variable success. But what I am scared off are golden samples. So if you get a review unit is that review unit representative for the average product that arrives at the customer?

[@shenzai1347]

It's hard for reviewers to know if they get a golden sample due to qc/manufacturer bias, because they'd have to get multiple units to measure and listen to

[@winnieid2727]

It happend in tech space, but it remedied somewhat with lots of reviewer that bought the off shelf product to test, and there is a forum with actual consumer that complains when it not as advertaised

[@ncf1]

I dont care what you say as long as the hair is perfect.

[@EL_Beta]

So... take your words as gospel, got it

[@AZREDFERN]

I ended up buying the HD800s after watching ALL of your videos. Not because of your review, but because they're ALWAYS on your desk. If they're "ngood" enough for the most critical/cynical reviewer out there to daily drive, they're "ngood" enough for me... unless you're being paid by ol' mate Senni to leave them on your desk?

[@das.krishi]

when is the headphones update coming out?!

[@けんこう林]

please review "final" earphons pls‼‼‼‼‼‼‼

[@thelastcomment8121]

Why did read tldw as too long didn’t wead?

[@lossmcginnis2139]

Punished Crinacle

[@CallEmOut-b]

Crinacle is honestly the best tech youtuber out there right now I'm glad he did this

[@addicz2]

No. I trust BGGAR and Notheme review

[@nathanel7637]

Here after the Salnotes Zero thing

[@actually_tes1]

I am from the future!

[@callmecheese4696]

This man getting v cocky

[@justindesrosiers3145]

Crin: As objective as I try to be, everything I say in my reviews stays a subjective opinion Me: B-but I’m watching you because I want your opinion Crin: …Fuck of-