Wide Angles and Super Duper Telephoto. Low Price. Big Results! Nikon P950 Review

[@jacko2454]

Thanks for reviewing the P950. I purchased it based on your P1000 review, as I knew from my research that the features were similar. I am a birder and the P950 fits my purposes almost perfectly. It has GREATLY increased my ability to capture photos that are pleasing to the intended audience - my eye and to the eyes of my friends/family. Thanks again!

[@christopherfothergil]

I totally agree. I had serious shoulder surgery and as a result could no longer carry and hold My cannon 6oo mm lens so as a result of this I sold up and purchased this camera and boy it did not disappoint in way. I have read reviews good and bad about this camera but for my purpose, Birding I think it is the best that money can buy.

[@FantazmagoricalOne]

Money well spent for this awesome camera! 👍

[@Greggie_D]

Finally an honest review without sensor snobbery! Well done!

[@bg3160]

I have the P900. Bought used for $350. I view it as a 2000mm lens that happens to have a camera attached. Purchased to augment my other cameras, where the distance was just too much for the lenses I have. Can't afford the super long lenses that fit the DSLR's. This one fits the bill nicely. Absolutely a point and shoot, but works like a dream. Highly recommend the P900 line for this type of photography. I'd rather work with the camera and get the shot than have no chance because I can't afford the lens.

[@mixeddrinks8100]

Totally agree with you there. Anything over 1000mm even APSC will cost a fortune, and heavy beyond recommendation so these super zoom will always have a place if you need the range. Zoos, outdoor venues etc.

[@salvatoreizaiah3511]

i know it is pretty randomly asking but do anybody know of a good place to stream newly released series online ?

[@konarr7158]

​@@salvatoreizaiah3511soap2day

[@PureAwareness76]

❤ Finally someone, lovely review! Enough with the sensor dictatorship & RAW + FF mania - who cares about a $2-5k telephoto lens? 😂 You wanna carry bro? I do not! I wanna be mobile, pick my gear and shot & go... And repeat! I'm 47, started visual astronomy at the age of 12, and attached many scopes, lenses to my camera since the 90's; no, I don't wanna hustle with Maksutovs (cathadioptric / mirror lens), etc., but I do wanna get close, right? And not for $4-5-10k! 😂

[@FantazmagoricalOne]

Same here. Don't have the cash flow for the expensive zoom lenses. Photography is expensive but FUN! So, I buy what I CAN afford and take it from there 👍

[@briansquibb999]

I've been using a P950 since Dec 2020. I am VERY happy with this purchase. It performs great in macro and telephoto and everything in between. Thank you for the review.

[@pushkarkumawat1280]

Is it plastic build or metal body

[@ronaldsand3000]

As an owner of a P1000, Leica SL2, Nikon D850 & Z7 I can say that on a bright day when you’re talking photos of slow or static images at lower focal lengths (up to 1,000mm) prints up to 10x 8 are as sharp and colourful as any of my other cameras

[@digger360]

Been using the P950 for the last 15 months and still learning and loving it .....great review

[@jeromereid6187]

Leigh, you are a brilliant story teller. I purchased this camera based on your review. I watched many reviews, and read many articles. You brought the story to life with an engaging and informed narrative. This made the decision easy for a Luddite who hates most technology. bless you.

[@onlyClaire]

I've had my P950 for a year, very happy with functions, and weight. My next camera will probably by a DSLR, but learning to use manual features and using RAW images has been a great.

[@enverjainudeen5737]

I have watched a lot of reviews on theNikon P950, this is the most comprehensive and detailed, also for me the best review I have seen so far

[@CharlesGrimm-p9q]

Nice down to earth review. Really the kind of review that would be very helpful to anyone thinking of buying a camera like this.

[@steviechalmers1218]

Great channel’ I purchased the P950 just over a month ago , I’ve taken some incredible shots of the sun setting over the North Atlantic off the outer Hebrides Scotland, I was also following the waxing moon and captured some beautiful shots, I also captured a cruise ship roughly 10 miles. Off the coast , the only challenge was sea haze and having to clean my lens , I’ve got several different cameras , including my trusty D300 that maybe old but it still delivers amazing images ,

[@paleroller]

LOL! I’ve been a subscriber for years, but quickly clicked on the link this time because of the cover photo. I live down the street from those osprey in Flagstaff...they have done quite a job on the nest this year. As always, wonderfully thorough review. Cheers from Flagstaff.

[@LeighAndRaymond]

Cool! I was on my way down the road to see if the prairie dogs were up yet, and I was pleasantly surprised to see this gal working hard that morning!

Until what zoom range would you consider that the picture quality is sufficient for printing on A3 format ?

[@jameskurzynski2386]

Thank you for this video Leigh. I know this video was posted a while ago, but it was very timely. Snowy Owls will soon be migrating into the area I live. There has been a lot in the "bird news" about how Snowy Owls are threatened and the piece was begging photographers not to bait or stress the owls. I have a 400mm lens, but was feeling some guilt about how close I would need to get to the owls to photograph them. After watching your video and doing some research, I ordered a used P950 and it comes tomorrow! I already feel less stress with the idea of not having to stalk Snowy Owls, but keep my distance to respect them while still getting my images. Thanks for helping me find a solution I wouldn't have thought of to help me enjoy bird photography, but also respect the animal's boundaries. Thanks! :)

[@FantazmagoricalOne]

I am of the same mindset... 👍

[@allancole9158]

Just purchased the P950 I’m new to photography so now to learn how to use it

[@XxSEETH3RxX]

I just bought the P950 today. I have a Nikon D3000 and a Sony Cybershot. I use both. And because of the prices on telephoto lenses that are out of price range. The P950 is the answer to my dilemma. I will still use the other two. I like them and have taught me alot about Photography.

[@PureAwareness76]

Cool. Why not the P1000, with 3000mm? 😊

[@wkoplitz]

Nice review. I've had both the P1000 and the P950, the P950 has a place in my camera bag. I use it to get the images I can't get with my current gear, like when I want to completely smear the background in a color that most "normal' lenses can't, this one does it, easy as pie. As you said, there is a learning curve unlike any other because of the small sensor, but I'm ok with the trade off.

[@blindspotter5859]

That is true. My friend has 2 p1000, which he uses to get close to the subjects (Birds). He uses his entire arsenal of dslrs for close photography and these 2 are long range companions.

[@AshishKumar-kv4hr]

Can you tell me what does P950 do better than P1000 and vice versa?

[@TahamasaAcademy]

I've just started researching this camera. I am a Canon DSLR user taking wildlife shots with a 90d and canon 100-400 L mk2 is lens. However I think there is room in my bag for this camera to take usable video of small birds that are beyond the reach of my 100-400 or 150-600 Sigma lens I have. The video will compliment my sharp stills taken of those birds that are a good bit closer to me. You have convinced me that this would be a good addition, not replacement. Thank you for your honest review.

[@stuartmeador8993]

different tools for different jobs... Thanks for the review..

[@brucegraner5901]

I enjoyed your review. I owned the P900 and found the lens to be excellent but eventually sold it because of the poor quality EVF and the frustrating too-slow or too-fast (and buffering) motor drive. I've looked at the P950 and Nikon seems to have fixed the EVF problem but I was wondering if you could tell me about the range of motor drive speeds on the camera. I decided to stick with my Canon SX60hs because it's light, the motor drive seems to be faster with much less buffering and it's digital range produces a surprisingly good image out to about 104X or the 35mm equivalent of 2,184mm's if you stay at ISO 200 or less. The Canon SX70hs has also greatly improved its EVF. These cameras perform better than you might think with just a hint of direct sunlight and low ISO settings. Both cameras are great for nesting bird photos while keeping a respectful distance from the wildlife.

[@degreiff1405]

Great review, liked a lot when you said "when you understand what you have here and what you dont".

[@tdub8719]

Thank you Leigh for the mini review. I was going to buy the P900 but people said don't, there's no RAW. Then I thought P1000 and people said it's too big and heavy. Is this the one? Just let me say I have very little knowledge of cameras but would like to try some entry level wildlife / astro photography.

[@brianeibisch6025]

Mate, you can not go wrong with the P950 for your purpose. It has an AUTO mode that will allow you to take great shots straight out of the box while you are learning the other modes and functions. Buying a camera book on the P950 would also be a good idea. The fact that you do not need to buy extra lenses for this camera is brilliant for budget photography. If you get this camera make sure to get a UV filter of the right size ( Tiffen or Hoya etc) to screw on and keep the lens perfectly clean and protected from accidental bumps. Also a good quality tripod is a good idea if you are going to use the extreme end of the zoom; I have a Manfrotto. Have one leg facing the same way as the lens and you should be right, just make sure the legs are tight so it doesn’t fall over. I have the P900 and the P1000 and just love them.

[@tdub8719]

@@brianeibisch6025 thanks Brian for your help. Appreciated.

[@glockasauruswrex6362]

As a former prosumer that carried around a huge backpack with 2 bodies n 3-4 very heavy Nikon lenses plus tripod...this camera is intriguing! Thnx for your review, it's spot on. If you have a modicum of skills n experience you'll realize this Lil Nikon can probably do it all. I'm after Macro shots mostly, but still love to go out n shoot 15 shot HDR landscapes, or portraits of my girl. Just waiting for a sale...😊

[@TomandMonica1]

Intelligent discussion as always and I always appreciate your clear and unadorned persona. It is so refreshing in contrast to much of the hyper-dramatic, over production that is so common on many other sites covering similar subject matter. Keep up the good work

[@jbehuniakjr]

Any update on this camera? Love your thought on comparing this camera to cell phone instead of DSLR. My DSLR can't go past 600mm all the 2000mm on this camera seems worth it

[@marcelevertsproducties]

I first watched the P1000 review, funny to see how your hair has grown in 2 years. :) Thanks for these reviews!

[@joebarry593]

Hello, I have a question for you. I have the Nikon P950. Last night I got some great pics of the moon. Both in moon mode and in Manual mode. The question I have for you is when I am in manual mode and switch to manual focus, I am unable to change the aperture and the shutter speed unless I switch back to auto focus. Am I doing something wrong or is this the way the camera is. Thank you Joe B. NJ

[@Pjgrent1]

I like the wifi feature on the P950 that sends the picture directly to my phone for quick review and sharing. With the new P950. Have a Canon 80D with a Sigma 15-0600 lens. With the Canon at a max distance 600mm after cropping the pictures is not as clear or as in focus as the p950 at 2000mm not cropped. Like not having to carry the heavy camera on the trail walks to get the wildlife photos. Thank you for the review.

[@Lysander-Spooner]

Would love a shoot-out of the P950 and the Sony RX10 Mark 4.

[@sfink16]

Interesting. I own the RX10 MKIV and love it and am surprised at it's quality. One inch sensors, like the two cameras you mention, do have better IQ than most phone for the most part with their much smaller sensors.

[@Lysander-Spooner]

@@sfink16 Yes, I have the Sony RX10M4 too. Suprisingly good IQ.

[@JLoAngelo]

hello ms, i need ur opinion. betwen P1000 and P950, which camera who have best image quality ?

[@ronspi]

I love my P900. Great video.

[@arpitagarwal5565]

extremely well articulated. I have the first Sony A7s with an insane ISO range and a quite a few prime and Zeiss lenses.. I recently bought this with the very objective that you have so well listed out. And your delivery is excellent. Thank you.

[@mrmoon7768]

Small sensor or not, For the price these are great for long distance wildlife shots

[@MDavidSchroeder]

Thanks for your reviews of the P1000 and P950! Could you tell e how the telephoto of the P950 compares with that of the Sony DSC HX400V? The Sony has 50X optical zoom/100X Clear Image zoom. Using the 100X Clear Image zoom, is that greater than the zoom capability of the Nikon P950? Thank you!

[@jeysphotohut71]

what are your recommended settings for bird photography using the P950?

[@philsmith4371]

Hi just wanted to know which camera you would choose between the canon sx70 and the nikon 950 I like taking bird photos in my garden

[@garethbanks2833]

Which tripod would you recommend for this camera and long hikes?

[@cloudpandarism2627]

i will get the P950 soonish and couldnt agree more what you said @6:10min to work WITH the cam and not expect it to perform like a full size sensor flagship because it is NOT. turn expectations down. keep ISO at 100. the light isnt enough for 100? then choose another time to get the photo you want where is more light available! throw all images in a denoise software like topaz AI or something fancy. i already told myself to set ISO to 100 and uninstall the physical ISO button. spend some money on a good tripod - problem solved. i checked online images from the 950 or 1000. even ISO 200-400 already starts to get bad fast to a point where you simply cant rescue the photo anymore on computer. dont use the cam for your next professional wildlife shooting job where you need to print it for a galery in 2 meter size and you are all fine. i am looking forward to what it is. keep my shootings at sunny daytimes and enjoy to be lazy sitting in my car while i should be in the middle of a dirty field on the ground to get that photo! cheers°

[@patrickfitzgerald2861]

You can shoot higher ISOs if you use Topaz AI, or better yet DXO Photolab 5 with the "Standard" presets applied, plus their Deep Prime NR. The problem with all tiny sensors is diffraction, which is probably starting to affect the images from this camera even at the largest aperture setting of f/6.5 in the telephoto range.

[@PureAwareness76]

❤ Finally someone, lovely review! Enough with the sensor dictatorship & RAW + FF mania - who cares about a $2-5k telephoto lens? 😂 You wanna carry bro? I do not! I wanna be mobile, pick my gear and shot & go... And repeat! I'm 47, started visual astronomy at the age of 12, and attached many scopes, lenses to my camera since the 90's; no, I don't wanna hustle with Maksutovs (cathadioptric / mirror lens), etc., but I do wanna get close, right? And not for $4-5-10k! 😂 So, thank you very much! 🎉

[@RareSense]

Hi guys watch both the P1000 and P950 reviews l was impressed with the images you got and video. The challenge l have is l want to upgrade my P900 although l don’t do raw yet but l do videos of kids football and travelling. It’s a great camera. A couple of questions. 1. Everyone says the Sony cyber shot RX10 IV is better because of 1inch sensor and better low light shots however not as much zoom p950. They both appeared to the uninitiated amateur like me both awesome images and l could not tell the difference as both took great photos. AM I missing something here? 2. What would you recommend between the two cameras? 3. Yet l have watched endless biased and unbiased reviews across KZbin on Sony and Nikon and must say l applaud and loved your factual no non sense review it was refreshing and honest review - thank you. I liked how you called out that the sensor although small on p950 took impressive shots as l too thought you weaved some magic with it and thought it presented as better value however being an amateur l would like a professional view on this. Many thanks in advance..

[@michaelnewsonjr6367]

HI ! Great video ! But what I would really lie to know is if you would recommend this camera for photographing my daughters soccer play ? Is it good for sports ? I just purchased one and I'm hoping that there is little to no blur in the shots where she's running etc... Hope to hear back from you soon. Thanks !

[@gabrieltechreviews8185]

Hello. I suggest buying the rx10 IV (try the used market) as it has much much better auto focus and shooting speeds. It's bigger sensor will also give you nicer cleaner photos. I own both for different things.

[@HelenaMikas]

Hi and 1st let me say I enjoyed your review .Some weeks back I purchased a Nikon P950- Basically I'm very happy , especially with the video and amazing detail when taking images of birds .To date and it's very early days .I found only one odd factor The colours are superb but when it comes to black ( as with cormorants ) they look like cutouts and are not so far away .Then white ( think of swans same again ) Everything else is fine .Must get a good tripod ..No idea how your courses work but would be interested .I live in Berlin speak fluent German but when it comes to techno I like to be able to double check .This is frowned on However let's say all is fine and I sign up for your course there is a time difference ........it's 3:30 am central european time so best be off to be .Look forward to hearing from you :)

[@lindalucia970]

Thanks for this! What about the Canon SX70 HS compared to this?

[@EduardoMendozaPhoto]

It would be great to have your thoughts on the Sony RX10 M4! Good work Snap!

[@tyronogle101]

100% agree

[@MultiPhotoDave]

It's terriffic the rx10 m4. Replaces changing lens even thepro are using it. There is a learning curve , but it's worth the time to learn all the features .

[@dskonsult1]

I was wondering what settings you were using when taking the osprey photos.

[@haiway85]

sorry but i want to ask, can it handle under light rain? because i searched the article says it's not weather resist

[@tombob0301]

Have had a P1000 for 2 years, love the reach. Not great for fast moving objects. Moon shots come out decent even hand held. A bit heavy, but compared to the 200-500 nikon lens just purchased to pair with my D5500, it seems light !

[@georgetarabay152]

I am confused between P950 and P1000, I heard that the P1000 has a better image contrast? which one you recommend if you were to buy one camera?

[@RJKYEG]

For amateur wildlife photos, just when opportunities present themselves while I'm walking my dog in the river valley ... do I try to score a used mirrorless or DSLR .. or this suped up point-and-shoot ?

[@mikkosuhonenphotography]

I use Coolpix B700. Good for birding and zoo trips

[@RoniWay]

Hi, thanks for this and the P1000 reviews. Very informative ! I was using the Panasonic FZ80 for wildlife videographing, but it is malfunction now, so I need a new superzoom camera. Do you have experience with the FZ80 video to compare with P1000/950 ? Was in mind to buy a new FZ80 ... but now changing more in favor to P1000 because the bigger optical zoom. what difference will I feel shooting video ? Is the P1000 stabilizer better (usually I'm on the move and shoot handheld) ?

[@sovsauce]

if you went and purchased a new superzoom, which did you choose and how does it compare to the fz80? i currently have that one and am looking for another superzoom!

[@rico66hharvey88]

Subscribed and enjoyed your video so will watch more, didn't quite understand everything you said because basically I am new to photography I mean camera photography as apposed to phone photos, bought the p950 Two weeks ago mainly for the zoom ( surprise surprise ) and happy with the auto setting and the results .... pretty sure I will be experimenting beyond auto soon. Anyway thank you and keep up the good work

[@lancealbon46]

Every year, I start watching Nikon P1000 and Nikon P950 reviews to decide if I want to upgrade from my older Nikon B700. But my Nikon B700 is half the weight of the P950, and a 1/3 of the weight of the P1000. When I look at the differences between my 1440mm zoom range of my Nikon B700, it isn’t too far off from the 2000mm or even 3000mm zooms of the P950 and P1000. My Nikon B700 also shoots in RAW and can also film in 4K, and my Nikon B700 has a 20mp sensor, unlike the 16mp on the other two. I do have other cameras like a Sony a7rii and Sony a7s (used for Milky Way photography) and Canon 650d (used for Macro photography), but I’m always curious about the longer 2000mm and 3000mm zooms over my current 1440mm zoom reach 🤔 decisions, decisions. Especially because both the P1000 and P950 are currently on big discounts.

[@HR-wd6cw]

It's all trade-offs. If you want a larger format camera (ie. FF) you'll need larger glass, and probably heavier glass. So one has to decide what features are most important to them. For me, I could see using something like this if I was taking a walk or a hike and my intention wasn't specifically to do wildlife (if I was gong to do wildlife then I would bring appropriate gear). Or for someone maybe wanting to take casual shots while on vacation. Obviously if you're more serious about photography or the qualify of image you want, you'll use something else, but for what these cost they can be good bargains considering what they can do. They're not designed to replace a FF or APS-C camera. And I could see getting one of these for what I mentioned, but not as a replacement by any means. Just another camera you can add to your arsenal of tools, just like how some people buy a Sony RX100 because they're pocketable. They can't replace a FF camera in most cases, but think about each camera in your kit as a different tool in a toolbox, just how a painter might have different brushes for different types or styles of painting. Yes there are some that can be one-and-done in most cases, like a regular FF or interchangable lens camera, but sometimes its not feasible to carry around that type of camera and a bunch of lenses.

[@mb-hb1fr]

Nice photographs, I own a canon cropped sensor DSLR camera, I want to upgrade my setup for bird and wildlife photography but for that a minimum of 400mm lens is needed which is as costly as Nikon P 950,should I consider purchasing a new lens or this camera. What would you suggest?

[@Gynra]

The Canon plus telephoto lens will give much better image quality. One needs to balance that against the convenience of an all-in-one zoom with the range of the P950. It's for the individual to decide which is more important to them.

[@LeighAndRaymond]

As Brian said, this is a personal preference situation. Your Canon may provide better image quality and low light performance (depending on the camera and lens), but this does have that incredible zoom in a relatively compact all-in-one package.

[@deingewissen_official]

2.8 70-300 D Nikon. 250 bucks used

[@AshishKumar-kv4hr]

Can you please tell me what are the P950's pros and cons over P1000?

[@Aarvind07]

P950 or d5300 or d 3500, or canon 250 d , please help me to decide

[@stefanosnapshots463]

Yeah had a similar bridge camera from Panasonic a few years back and liked the colours and the zoom but I agree with your comment re lack of depth of field but the zoom was impressive!

[@TomGodzik]

I have a bridge camera and it works great for me. If you want to carry a lot of weight around you go right ahead and also spend a lot of money. I’m using what works best for me. ❤❤❤ Great video. Thanks for sharing your story.

[@abhaykatekar]

Thanks. Need to see the your videos too. I am thinking of buying a P950 or a P1000. This helps.

[@duanemcclun]

A very well thought out and informative video!! I liked your comment about the P950 not competing with the cell phone but offering options that the cell phone doesn't. I have 2 P900s and I would never give them off because just like you said, they get me the far away shots that I'd never be able to get with a DSLR. Best wishes Duane

[@mdmurray17]

Its about the enjoyment and frankly horses for courses. I find my P900 a bit of fun and a good do it all tool.

[@jaycee6996]

I have traded in my Nikon DSLRs to move to lighter equipment. I have a P950 and recently bought a RX10 4. The P950 gives me images that my D500/sigma 150-600 cannot. It sucks with birds in flight at close to intermediate range. That is why I got the SONY which is excellent for birds in flight in the areas where the P950 is deficient. The d500/Sigma is so easy to use to get really good shots but it weighs a ton and I am too old and decrepit to cart it around all day. To get good results with the P950 needs quite a lot of skill (look at Stafford Fuhs channel). The SONY so far is in many respects easier and gives better quality images but cannot match the P950 in terms of reach. With developments in AI based software for image processing which I have started using I am confident both my new systems will give really high quality results.

[@49er1680]

Can you use the P950 for portraits or weddings? I have a DSLR (Nikon D3100). Yes, old camera, but editing helps. Maybe a little longer with the editing. I like to shoot everything. I guess you can say I "Freelance".

[@keitha.9788]

P950 is ok for general photography. But for serious photography like portraits and weddings, use a DSLR, period.....

[@TheWolf-lq3ne]

Does the p950 has the feature of face tracking and USB charging as in p1000?

[@Trekeyus]

Usb charging yes not sure about face tracking

[@Bazoonk337]

I got this camera for plane spotting and it is great!!

[@munjalvyas7816]

Can we take flying birds images in p 950?

[@kalidas4080]

Can you talk about canon sx70hs? I have confusion choosing sx70hs or p1000 ,p950 ??? Could you suggest which is better one !

[@ganyungchyan9616]

My experience on Canon SX70HS: it cannot show words clearly on an aircraft flying at a faraway distance. It suddenly blacked out when I was rewinding the camera to view my previous shots during the fifth day of usage.

[@ganyungchyan9616]

Can Nikon P950 be used under heat haze?

[@seafood459]

Please tell us if the extra 1000mm is worth the cost and $$$

[@gabrieltechreviews8185]

Depends on you but to me is not. The difference from 2000mm to 3000mm is not very dramatic.

[@seafood459]

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 thanks :D

[@tetik5]

CAN YOU TELL ME PLEASE HOW TO GET MY PICS /FILM ONTO MY LAPTOP THANK YOU

[@rogerwest4169]

There's a dail on the 950 that I can't figure out the function of. The dial is on the same plain right behind the on off switch.

[@alexandriabanjoboy]

I am confused weather I were to purchase Nikon 950 vs Nikon Z fc. I love to travel and take photos of buildings, architectural designs of buildings and landscapes. A bit of street photography maybe. Or even people. Which is better to have. Thank you

[@ganyungchyan9616]

Is Nikon P950 suitable for capturing shots of aircraft flying at a faraway distance clearly?

[@ColinMill1]

Very interesting review. Thanks. What I'm trying to decide is what to buy to do the things my old P510 can't do. I find the 510 OK in good light for documenting the birds here on our farm but in low light or where the birds are amongst branches etc the autofocus is incredibly frustrating and the finder isn't sharp enough to make use of the manual focus (and here in the UK we get lots of days with poor light!). My short-list really consists of the P950 and the Sony RX10 iv. I would be most interested in your thought on the relative merit of these two cameras. Thanks.

[@blindspotter5859]

p950 Range x sony rx 10 iv - 600 mm with a bigger sensor. If your subjects are relatively close, sony is good. if they are faaaar, p950 is good.

[@TonyPowell180]

I shoot video with mine but get blurry images when I zoom in to quite a high level, are my settings not configured correctly. Don't ask me at what zoom; it could be from above 1000mm, but others appear to get quality bird shots (video) at 2000mm; why might that be? I'm an amateur and always learning, but I wondered what I might be doing wrong? Any help would be much appreciated. Tony

[@sravydogs]

Hi, I am wondering if you can help me, I want a camera for wildlife shots, birds, deer, etc, and want really good pictures. I did have the p950 set in mind, but now I have seen the Sony fx10 iv. Which camera would be best please? I am totally new to cameras.

[@joebarry593]

Please help if you can. I had my P950 out yesterday and it would not fucus on anything beyond 700/800mm with the auto focus engaged. It, however, did focus while using manual focus in all zoom settings. I called Nikon and the tech told me that I have to use the manual focus beyond 700mm. I find this hard to believe. Thank You Joe B.

[@ministerofjoy]

Thank you so much! This videos is just excellent!👏🏽🙌🏼

[@faisalee]

Perfect review, I am looking to get the P1000 or P950! Both of which look very capable of what they are meant for, and more of course 👍🏽

[@dorisroot514]

I bought the P1000 wish i knew how heavy it would be lol but i like it only thing i cant figure out or maybe cant get a pic of is flying buzzards ? any suggestions ? ty

[@dilusathe2020]

Can I use p950 photo for competition. Because he have small sensor

[@lim2001burger]

I haven’t found a review that employs the hot shoe on the P950/P1000 for off-camera flash; you may not have shown it, but did you happen to try it? I have the smaller brother of the P series (B700) and I use it a lot for birding, but it doesn’t have a hot shoe. I’m only just getting into ocf, so suddenly cameras with hot shoes are now interesting to me 😅. Great review as always!

[@LeighAndRaymond]

I did not use the hot shoe on this camera but I expect it works the same as any other camera. :)

[@ingejony5603]

Very nice video thanks Leigh

[@TheGKFront]

Hey Leigh! in late 2022, is there any real competitor to this camera?

[@gabrieltechreviews8185]

Unfortunately nothing if you want to go past the 600mm range

[@tachometer-flac]

I tried a zoom test with a Samsung Galaxy. The specs say 125x zoom, 4K resolution, more than 100 MP. So I put a bottle of vitamins on the counter, walked 10 feet away and zoomed into the small text (back of the bottle), and it was smudged/blurry at best. It was not a good photo. I tried the same on a very old canon bridge camera with only 50x zoom, 1080p resolution, less than 20 MP. The focus was good and the text was clear. The photo was decent enough to post on social media. I guess I just don't understand what these specs mean but I would probably disagree if people are saying phones make any bridge camera obsolete.

[@denisgerard783]

Very informative! Thanks. I have subscribed.

[@elusive_mg]

for me p 1000 is REALLY ENOUGH...so glad that i have it! greetings

[@arkansastraveler7698]

I have been using Denoise ai to get rid of the noise at high ISO

[@alonzowinston5470]

Thanks for the "FYI" on the p950! It was helpful! But l am good with my p1000 for one thing it take good pic,s, and it is perfect for me to handle because l have large hand,s, and it fit like a glove with me!

[@jimwlouavl]

Thanks for you always great, accessible style about an interesting camera. And huge bonus points for The Child!

[@ZoneTelevision]

Could you please review the D3s ? Thank you.

[@jeffeisenberg4743]

Thank you Leigh for your excellent review. Jeff Brooklyn, N.Y.

[@gitchiemanito2408]

Excellent review

[@garyscaife429]

Love the shirt

[@Sebastian-ht9my]

Oh miss.. you explained everything so well. Besides im not good at english I understand you well. You have zoom, you have some clarity, but you dont have.. the depth. Thats right. You have some kind of a monocular..but is it a perfect camera? No. It just not. But much of them are not perfect in some ways. So sometimes...it is good choice. For the more demanding player.. is not good choice.

[@kilarvo]

I want to buy a camera unable to decide between Nikon P950 and Nikon z50 + Sigma 150-600 Mm F/5-6.3 Dg Os HSM Contemporary Lens Please help

[@arthurorichardson4956]

Love the p1000 review

[@spyhunter6411]

How are the full auto settings? My wife really wants to participate in my photography hobby with me, and also capture pictures of our family. We had a baby in January and she doesn't have the interest, or really time, to learn the mechanics of a serious camera like I did pre baby. Maybe one day, but for now it would be nice to have a capable, but autonomous, camera to pair with our xt4. We do everything from landscape to wildlife photography together

[@LeighAndRaymond]

Congratulations on the baby! I didn't use Auto but I expect it would work fine in terms of exposure and white balance, but autofocus in Auto, where the camera chooses where to focus, can be iffy. That is the case in most cameras, but even face and eye detect aren't as swift/accurate on this camera.

[@ganyungchyan9616]

Under hazy, foggy condition, will Nikon P950 capture clear pictures of objects flying?