"WILDLY Unhinged" Eric Weinstein On Terrence Howard's Science

"Trust the science" became the mantra during the pandemic - but now it seems we're living in an age where the likes of Terrence Howard and Candace Owens are trying to debunk it.
Actor Howard recently raised eyebrows when he appeared on Joe Rogan's podcast, claiming he can kill gravity and doesn't believe in the number zero among other outlandish theories.
Piers Morgan speaks to mathematician and physicist Eric Weinstein - who was invited by Rogan to challenge Terrence's theories - before the pair are joined by cosmologist Professor Brian Keating and KZbinr Tom Bilyeu.
00:00 - Introduction
04:11 - Eric Weinstein on Terrence Howard
08:09 - Neil DeGrasse Tyson's criticism
13:12- Was Eric right to engage with Howard?
22:12 - Do we trust science anymore?
25:40 - Professor Keating calls Eric out
34:50 - Tom Bilyeu - we live in the 'age of conspiracy'
37:47 - Candace Owens on the 'cult of science'
46:09 - Can Elon Musk save science?
Visit Tom Bilyeu's KZbin channel: / @tombilyeu
Visit Brian Keating's website: BrianKeating.com
Visit Brian Keating's KZbin channel: kzbin.info...
Subscribe to stay up-to-date on all Uncensored content.
Follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on:
X: x.com/PiersUncensored
Instagram: / piersmorganuncensored
Facebook: / piersmorganuncensored
TikTok: / piersmorganuncensored
Follow Piers Morgan on:
X: x.com/piersmorgan
Instagram: / piersmorgan
#science #piersmorgan #joeroganinterviews #interview #debate

[@PiersMorganUncensored]

Do you trust science?

[@johnnysilverhand1733]

Yea lol.

[@somadinaumeh7424]

What else is there to trust? God?

[@PhillyHardy]

Not universally and def media

[@jasher1347]

“Trust the science.” -2020

[@scottmitchell1974]

Not as much as I used to.

[@glitchtv4279]

Why aren’t they attacking Neil for saying gender is a spectrum like they attack Terrence Howard 🤔

[@user-dj9iu2et3r]

Because scientists who focus on biology agree. Dummy.

[@Rac-fpv]

Must be exhausting being a Rightwinger and constantly thinking about where a transexual takes a 💩

[@scrillion6]

Today I wore pants tomorrow I’m wearing a skirt

[@SmallFry900]

Neil calling gender a spectrum probably has something to do with how he uses the word gender.

[@crzyprplmnky]

Same ❤​@@scrillion6

[@WHATDATTOOLDO]

People lost faith in "science" when they figured out it can be purchased...

[@sheenalauj8441]

Exactly!

[@hara3435]

às evidenced during crowvid shennanigans.

[@matthewkinsey9044]

​@@hara3435 ..and climate change puesdo science

[@Betty1975]

As an electrical engineer with master in biomedical engineering, I completely agree. 👍

[@bazmc1153]

Thats a good tattoo

[@jack37133]

The irony of piers questioning him about platforming liars and charlatans is rich.

[@pathfinderwellcare]

💯 😭

[@Wilsongaboi]

To challenge their viewpoints? He isn't necessarily an agreeable guy, most of the time there's heated arguments.

[@ixinor]

@@jack37133 Yeah, the irony to question science when most things you use is science. Counting, language, time, food, water, transport, medical, money, calenders. Etc. If you dont trust science, you should just not exist at all. Since you use it constantly youre in a biased world if you think otherwise.

[@GT19873]

Asking a question is not the same as having a position on the topic. Learn the difference. Piers was setting him up to spike the ball. Nothing more than that.

[@AG-fg1uk]

Meanwhile Piers platforms pedoph*les and cannibals (Kevin Spacey and Armie)

[@user-ci4nx6kj8n]

Science is a tool. It’s like asking ‘do you trust hammers’

[@tienstar7873]

The people in this video are also tools.

[@GT19873]

Good metaphor. And asking if you trust a tool makes sense. Meaning, is the took reliable?

[@astronaut98]

You can question if you trust a tool when applied to a situation. For example, do you trust science in the application of politics? There you get political science and political science philosophy trying to answer that question.

[@davidcunningham9282]

Exactly, and where there's quality control for the production of something like a hammer, there's peer reviewing for scientific research

[@susiew2521]

I'd definitely trust a spanner 🔧

[@mosl2te]

I do trust science and it should be questioned and proven over and over again. Censorship is not the answer at all!

[@Yaa-r6o]

Fock yea Moster def

[@calicoskyband]

This is how it works!

[@Frightcontrol]

did you question Terence's claims?

[@vege4920]

Questioning things repeatedly forever can just amount to a waste of time and attention with nothing gained.

[@TheInternationalJew-vn4bn]

@@vege4920 the 3rd most important part of science is REPEATABLE what are you on about?

[@xavierb9061]

neil cant even tell you what a woman is

[@MADDcartman]

Jesus Christ

[@robbsclassics]

​@@MADDcartmanNo he was a man.

[@jato2942]

Well it’s a somewhat of a hard question depending on how technical you want to go. You ahead and define it for me and I can show you why it’s difficult

[@yeahdontknow57]

Go marry one and find out

[@Predatorsnightmare]

Neil can obviously tell you what a female is What your talking about is Neil not taking the same position of you on wether we can allow people who are not female to call themselves women That's not a question of science or fact but of society and ethics.

[@SuperReggie29]

Terrence just needs to take a class for about 4 years

[@ThirtVlogz]

That’s the problem (taking a class) it’s like saying the opposite. Imagine if Terrance was teaching the class. The class doesn’t matter if your being told untrue things

[@bradzone5221]

To Neil’s defense he didn’t release the peer review for years until he was name checked on JRE🤣

[@DefinitelyNotAnUndercoverCop]

Release it? Terrance had it all that time

[@juliogonsalves4670]

And destroyed it

[@skyword5508]

Here we are watching Neil et al on the 'Piers Reveiw'

[@stinkletoes8285]

Tyson lost me when he said he had no problem with trans in womens sports..and his reasoning for it.

[@user-cg4qu3qn6c]

Same here.

[@livioangel]

😂😂 who cares! you are so easily distracted,

[@Silkysmooth-qk5nc]

Didn’t he say we should measure testosterone’s or something daft like that

[@valentinogeorgievski]

NDT is still convinced that autoritys did a good job in the time of the pandemic. So smarth, got huge ego, but out of touch with reality.

[@blubirdhill2608]

​@@livioangelAnd you're so easily propagandized. So there's that.

[@inittowinit3260]

Neil… the guy who says gender IS on a spectrum 😂

[@francoisschneegans8881]

He didn't mean it, he was very high on the jab at that time.

[@tonydain3454]

Do your history...and learn some science... there has been third genders for 1000s of years. Sometimes it's better to say nothing , rather than show how ignorant you might be

[@stivib5937]

dude has lost all pf his credibility

[@JoeLancaster]

Neil is correct. That is the scientific position.

[@exclamationpointman3852]

Zero respect for that!!!

[@Jaguar1314]

It's so refreshing to see people take turns to talk.

[@andrewkarsten5268]

“Secret service level of never making a mistake” isn’t aging well lol

[@kəanıncupıdo]

Maybe that mistake wasn't a mistake. 😳😏

[@andrewkarsten5268]

@@kəanıncupıdo maybe, but unfortunately I don’t think we’ll ever get enough information to know

[@assaqwwq]

@@kəanıncupıdo ​ the mistake is you thinking it makes a difference. Putin caused an oil crisis that affected every single individual on the planet. Has anyone done anything about Putin? Have you? Putin remains untouched. So who cares if it was or wasnt a mistake? Nobody gonna change anything.

[@TheKrensada]

​@andrewkarsten5268 The fact that we won't is enough information in and of itself.

[@wayneveitch8325]

Piers looking rather uncomfortable when the matter of Covid and follow the science came up 😂😂😂😂😂

[@polycarp9897]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@thekeystone7963]

Timestamp?

[@ifiwantitibuildit]

Because he did vaccinate his kids....and he was so proud of that....Andrew Tate laughed in his face for that

[@sb75ification]

I saw it too! 😂😂

[@sojernon8689]

lol at title “unhinged Eric Wienstein”.. the good doctor was as cool as a cucumber as he refuted his colleague and friend

[@zenbrentdraper]

Science isn’t supposed to be a faith based religion.

[@jacopopergreffi5802]

so i wonder why anyone for which science is a faith based religion (since a lot of comments seem to be spewed by first-day maths amateurs) suddenly starts cheering for Terrence. Quite ironic

[@cyberft]

Brian Keating is adept at building strawmen. I used to like the guy, but anyone resorting to appeals to authority is my enemy.

[@ryderjolly5322]

They use to be one in the same

[@jasonwhite6463]

It never has been. Only in the mind of right wingers is that the case bcuz none of it aligns with their crazy.

[@ufdas-wu1cr]

these people are not scientists they're propagandists. Their number 1 mission is to destroy the 1st amendment. if that happens god help us.

[@radfoo72]

"You can't stop me, I'm my own worst enemy and my own bestfriend." -Terrence Eric: That was a beautiful statement. 😂😂😂

[@Vengess1]

We do peer reviews in college every week. There are no lords in my classroom..

[@HodadHodad]

Challenging science IS science, and it didnt start with COVID, Piers.

[@TheGardenerNorth]

You are right, however the challenging of science completely stopped during covid!

[@crushinnihilism]

​@@TheGardenerNorthit stopped with peer review

[@someguy5438]

​@@crushinnihilismpeer review is a fundamental aspect of all modern science. You are not a bright boy.

[@Cushpot]

@TheGardenerNorth how did challenging science stop during COVID?

[@damyr]

@@Cushpot Because it turned into a dogma... An extremely harmful dogma, which costed millions of young lives lost and trillions of dollars.

[@Heavenly.Harlot]

Having a doctorate doesnt mean you cant be a hack

Walk around Cambridge, MA and you will see how accurate your comment is! Same is likely true for the 'other' Cambridge

[@AJ........]

They just want to remain the gatekeepers of science

[@not_glad]

90%+ of professors identify to be on the left. They've turned academia hyper partisan and expect respect in return. Nah.

[@beng4647]

Read Eric's math theories. He is actually really dumb. It is shocking.

[@BobbyWhitby]

In terms of Eric Weinstein Brain Keating is one of the greatest cosmologists in the world (he is building the largest telescope on earth), he is one of his best friends, he is also best friends with Lee Smolin co founder of quantum loop theory and he is also freinds with Edward Frankle one of the greatest mathematicans in the world. and they all say he is one of the smartest people they know he is no hack.

[@ramonrobinson7975]

If Terrence Howard is not telling the truth or misunderstanding his drone shapes. Then prove that he is not scientifically and stop the discussion.

[@Thestonedavidthrows]

I trust science, but those who interpret and seem to posture as the authority can not be trusted.

[@obicubed]

It’s ironic that the smartest person on the panel (Eric) is the only one who respects the capacity of the general public to weigh up ideas intelligently

[@rubyrubi1165]

lmao imagine thinking that Eric is the smartest person on the planet :)))

[@dsetts]

They said the panel, of which he is.

[@ClintByrne]

Eric is genuinely a good guy and I enjoyed his appearance and we need more Erics.

[@ClintByrne]

@@rubyrubi1165reading skills might not be up to snuff.

[@Hentaied1]

It's ironic that the people who agree with this message are not commenting because they are intelligent

[@cbreazienutz]

South Park is already working on this parody😭

[@sibusisofaya7874]

😂

[@menasouvlaki3595]

They are the best

[@FisicaDirectoaoAssunto]

You can bet on that!

[@--Singularity--]

They´ve had 20 years time. So it should be goooood.

[@sevindee1843]

I thought this WAS the parody❗

[@Thegreek1331]

Never seen him so quiet he had no clue what was going on lol

[@cryptokingpinlife8399]

“28 missed called from Neil Degrasse Tyson”

[@GODsCHILD-lm6df]

I believe it ! PS this entire panel is all nerds and jerks. Sometimes they combine and create a NDG //NPC InI ❤ new ideas and possibilities to make the People of the Worlds 🌍 🌎 Collide in Peace ✌🏾

[@Not_A_Tourist]

27

[@ACS402010]

The moment I see Neil deGrasse Tyson's face, I turn a deaf ear to him. I literally have zero interest in anything he has to say.

[@MMAGamblingTips]

I need reasons.

[@hermonymusofsparta]

​@@MMAGamblingTipshe doesn't know what a woman is

[@asdszf]

weird way to say "I can't understand science so I just ignore it" 😆

[@marshie20193]

@@MMAGamblingTips There are a lot of stories about him trying to pick up freshman he was teaching when he was a professor.

[@user-gp1bu9dp9e]

@@marshie20193 Seems like a wild allegation you got any source for that ?

[@jaydee2012]

People know that they have been lied to repeatedly, so they don't trust anyone or anything anymore.

[@tannerh151]

Thats not true at all. I trust cats

[@Probabilityislife]

Either that was a joke or you're one of the weird people detached from reality.​@@tannerh151

[@mouhalo]

@@tannerh151 cats are sincere they dont play games and hide their intentions and if they dont like you, youll know at the minute . a lot superior lool

[@Predatorsnightmare]

I find that people don't take the experience of being lied to and not trust others, rather they find someone else to trust They start trusting their Facebook group or anyone who calls themselves an expert and affirms what they want to believe

[@danilonden3782]

The proof math and physics work is the phone in your hand where you watched this video on a qhd screen the size of a creditcard over the internet.

[@andybside]

NDT is a TV personality. Not a scientist.

[@masteringr6714]

Not suggesting Howard is onto anything (I don’t know) but to think that because someone hasn’t gone through the typical institutions to learn about a subject instantly means it is impossible to have anything significant to add to that subject shows just how fragile and insecure Professor Keating is. Often times it is the folks that take unusual paths that have the most to offer in terms of ideas. Keating sounds like someone that wouldn’t dare think outside the box of mainstream academia…

[@pathfinderwellcare]

💯

[@vids595]

No one says that it is impossible, simply that is is very unlikely and the way we determine if they have something worthwhile is in part peer review, which is more than just being published in a peer reviewed journal.

[@KatsFurBabys]

you dont know what your talking about, and its like saying, just because he didnt study how to be a heart surgon doesnt mean he cant do operations because hes looked at books from 60-100yrs ago and discard the current technologys..

[@masteringr6714]

@@vids595 That is not the impression Professor Keating gave off but to each his own 👍🏼 Also, working in the world of academia for part of my career I know what peer review is very well 😉

[@joceilievski]

name three instances where such a person did just that. it's not an insecurity it's incredulity and justifiably so. To say to someone who has devoted their life to their profession which requires continual study, a requirement to publish your work and have it challenged by all your peers, that they shouldnt be dismissive of the opinion of someone 'self taught'. Next time you need surgery and a musician with a passion for anatomy and biology walks into the operating theatre and offers their ideas about the procedure you're about to have you will presumably be comfortable having your surgeon entertain those opinions?

[@adammclean7738]

What I love about these guests, unlike practically every other debate on Piers's shows, is they will actually sit and listen and wait their turn to respond instead of interrupting and shouting over one another. Very refreshing to watch and listen to

[@ViragoRiver]

That is why this has been my favorite episode of the dozen or so I've seen.

[@SophieSionByde]

I totally agree! It’s a nice change to hear them respect each other, even when they disagree!

[@smithjabi]

​@@SophieSionBydeMorgan's show has been designed around the crosstalk format, people can jump in anytime

[@guidobolke5618]

Amateurs 🙂

[@acpjr]

It's because 2 out of 3 guests are university professors, not lawyers, social media influencers, nor quasi celebrities.

[@christianbolt5761]

It is nice to see that Eric giving Terrence respect where it is deserved, self taught and curious about new ideas.

[@sspbrazil]

But a nut job.

[@brianmeen2158]

I really enjoyed rogans podcast with Eric and Terrence

[@JoeMammy-jl9js]

You are an lDlOT like hustle and flow man

[@foundationofthought7155]

Terrance is not there , although smart. He knows buzzwords that the average person, ie you, doesn't, so he sounds like he has something. He does not understand math and physics at all.

[@WhatDemocracy]

​@@brianmeen2158I agree both podcasts where extremely entertaining. I didn't agree with anything terrance said but I found it fascinating

[@js-ln7ld]

I trust science... but not science we aren't allowed to discuss, debate or disagree with

[@setzz69]

correct. that’s the whole idea. to be able to debate any theory put forward by science.

[@KizzleMcDizzle-vc2wf]

Maybe we wouldnt want to debate it if it was fully open maybe we would but everyone deserves the opportunity

[@BenWilson24]

His claims did get discussed. His ideas were reviewed, then he got upset with the feedback

[@ira9787]

⁠​⁠@@KizzleMcDizzle-vc2wf you can discuss and debate science all you want. No one is stopping you. The issue is wanting to engage in science on an academic level when you lack the knowledge or expertise in the field to lay basis for your scientific arguments/claims. Now let’s say you could, you don’t go into research for the sole purpose of arguing or stating opinions, you have scientific frameworks that you follow, you have questions that your research aims to answer, maybe past studies have failed to answer those questions or address some problem but you’re research is successful and you have to argue why that’s the case with evidence. Science isnt about being right or appeasing to peoples egos. Science is only as good as the people who contribute to it.

[@trademarkuk7504]

Science teaches not to have intellectual conviction on something that does not have definitive conclusion = theory.

[@JohnJohnson-wy6fk]

This is why I'm such a huge fan of Eric. We live in a strange world where scientists, who have a public presence, have a reputation for being incurious and condescending. Eric is well-mannered, but he has balls. Academia is riddled with cowards

Your last sentence is very much spot on.

[@kidusgetachew9215]

Eric is Terrence Howards with PHD

[@TheRealCizzle]

Well said ... You person. 😊

[@mico5003]

I didn’t knew trash has manners.

[@lukefrahn8538]

exactly; filled with too many poindexters who are easily bullied into compliance

[@Jegskalligeforstå]

Eric is such a class act - reminding everybody what a grown up man with respect, a heavy set of balls and a large heart looks like.

[@lukewyeth1568]

No, he is simply using Terrance Howard to promote his own grift. That is all.

​@@lukewyeth1568suppose that's one take. A pretty foolish one.

[@flangekiwi]

👍🏾

[@paulchaney7762]

100%

[@larryjake7783]

Yeah its a grift, he is using Terrance to spring his public career. Unfortunately he's boring so...

[@jaywilk7249]

The biggest oxymoron in this whole thing is the title slate "Piers Morgan" Uncensored, then it has "KZbin" on the bottom.. smh

[@QuinnieMae]

Why are you watching?

[@Ryfhoff]

One of the only episodes where there is no talking over each other. Respect for these guys.

[@renegadeseed375]

When weed wants to get high it smokes Terrace Howard

[@Alix88mnm]

Dummy high

[@mangochutnee]

😂

[@FrederikAbramson]

Scary Movie 2 Remake 2024 with Tarrance😂😂😂

[@MMAGamblingTips]

Banger!

[@BIGSID320]

😂

[@rkewer1]

Mr. Weinstein gets it. I hope many others like him start speaking out

[@SolomonJames-il1if]

Every one on the the panel got it except the snob scientist

[@SolomonJames-il1if]

@@11235but they deferred to eric because he's the man on the field

[@jt-oz]

What a great episode. You come away from this with hope for the future and clarity on how off track things have gotten and where.

[@feleciagoldson2834]

It's time to find a Fashion Designer, make Terrance, a foil, head to toe, outfit.

[@_TheGman]

I love that "I want friends, I need friends" so humble.

[@TerenceChill286]

Stop mocking a guy who claims that 1x1=2, lots of you guys were tricked into believing that men can get pregnant.

[@user-wn1kq8jx5q]

😂😂😂

[@bpharaoh8765]

Word yo! Dem’some FAX!

[@borkochrisko5306]

True! 😂🎉

[@slappy8941]

It's not an either/proposition.

[@jazellars]

😂

[@sanchezfair5950]

The irony of talking about somebody's methods and philosophies without having them on the show is wild!

[@Chesterfrancissouth]

He probably refused

[@djjaysmoke]

He probably asked who and who were going to be there, and he said nuuuuh. I'll pass. 😅

[@forsakenquery]

"Secret service level" aged well

[@dreddwulf26]

You didn't have to put in that cheesy music when Terrence was explaining stuff 😂😂

[@0626jrp]

I noticed that too😂😂😂 why did they do him like that?

[@Illhostility]

Probably bc without it, much of our population would be right on board with it 😂

[@TheJimicus]

​Because it was funny and shouldn't be taken seriously?

[@cyberft]

@@Illhostility99.99% of our population can’t disprove what he is saying including the producers of this show. This was just gross manipulation of what people should think.

[@sspbrazil]

@@cyberftum, what he said was disproven multiple times though, so there’s that.

[@user-fv1ev7yb7u]

Dr. Eric talked with Terrence like a decent human being.

[@nnnnnbcsyihgfchj]

Yeah, right. He sounded like a Mafia boss.

[@unityorelse2375]

No he did not. What did you watch. This man was very condescending and fake!

[@cperez1000]

@@unityorelse2375, he was right though

[@Mark-fo6hz]

@@cperez1000 now this is really weird, I'm not even a fan of terrence but it's clear that this guy doesn't let him talk which i do understand why.. while watching that podcast i wanna hear more of terrence reasoning, but most of the time its deflected to something else basically its going nowhere, and it was stated early on eric wants to be in control

[@jasonolinger7585]

@@nnnnnbcsyihgfchj Eric was talking to a guy who was telling the world that their whole lives are based off of a false reality and their life's work meant pretty much nothing, on the world biggest platform. I think Eric handled it like a true gentlemen.

[@MarkShinnick]

Tyson is something of a politician.

[@theMatrix440]

I am an MD PhD. It is widely known that over the past 50 years, science has been subject to biases. Those now have become worse with politicization. I trust science that I evaluate but not Mainstream politicians, people like Neil or Eric, or media.

[@8aNda1d]

Terrance?

[@TONY86448]

Facts

[@ryanjamesc9996]

Is Eric Weinstein not saying the exact same thing? He seems trustworthy to me because of his disdain for “mainstream” science

[@scratchpenny]

@@ryanjamesc9996 He's trustworthy in the sense that he believes in real science. But he's not totally committed to it. He's also a businessman who works for venture firms. Thus, he likely has biases and things he would rather not discuss. That's why we should listen to people with a little bit of skepticism.

[@lag757]

@@ryanjamesc9996agreed

[@OSGFitness]

Do you condemn 1x1=2?

[@JustJerryPodcast]

Bruh!!! Omg

[@andyfatknob9403]

That's funny

[@stephengallagher2209]

Racists!

[@bobbyblazes4398]

This has to boom and be the top comment 😂

[@amiltonmoreira2341]

THAT IS ANTISEMETIC

[@playronestudios7574]

😂 it’s not one apple times one apple, it’s one apple times the number 1.

[@Debthouse]

Thank you Mr. Weinstein for calling out Neil de Grasse Tyson for his arrogance, dismissiveness, and hypocrisy.

[@Garfunkymunky]

I don't understand the controversy over this. Terrance Howard presented some wild ideas and was more than willing to have them challenged by an expert like Wienstein. Now we can make up our own minds. That's how it's supposed to be! That's healthy and necessary!

[@kathleen7849]

Exactly. Piers and guests seem to think they can decide what people can discuss.

[@pseudoscientist8010]

Obviously Terrence was correct about more than the religion of scientism wants out, and Their power is being threatened.

[@user-qx2kh7fp4p]

@@pseudoscientist8010he’s definitely not correct & if you think he is it’s because you don’t understand elementary level times tables

[@dxvinyard]

"Make up our own minds" is a strange way of putting it. Scientific claims can be disproven, it's not politics.

[@M_k-zi3tn]

Make up your own mind about what 1×1 equals?

[@TheHarrie93]

Eric was being gracious to Howard BECAUSE he's a scientist. Einstein once said to a group of scientists: "You all dismiss my theory yet none of you have been able to disprove it". Science is always uncertain and a continuous process of elimination.

[@DirtRoadFarmers]

Same thing he did with terrance howard.

[@jasminejones9937]

Exactly 👍

[@GooseHen25]

Eric was being gracious because he is usually gracious and I think attempts to be a human being first- above other roles.

[@TheHarrie93]

@@GooseHen25 Agreed, but to him being a scientist means being open to every possiblity and that is what he dislikes in the current science. It's a corrupt power hierarchy.

[@amylynnhunt55]

That was quite possibly the most thoughtful and reasoned comment I have ever seen here, thank you. I have come to realize that Piers likes having guests who fight. We - human beings in general - do not need more of that. Maybe having everyone in the same room for these discussions would help?

[@TDrudley]

Is this the only episode where the guests never screamed at each other? heh

[@danrandall3302]

Get professor Dave on next time

[@jtip]

Eric is the type of person I would get along great with. His way of confronting issues without totally dismissing the entire thing and breaking every single topic out with critical thinking, while acknowledging the good shows the type of person he is in the scientific community. Need more like him.

[@dandabash]

totally agree .. he has something unique.. v high IQ but also v high EQ (emotional quotient)

[@crushinnihilism]

​@@dandabashhes autistic

[@christianheinz3395]

​@@dandabash yeah, that's rare today.

[@Dedicated_.1]

Agree, he’s the type of tutor you would want as a young Physics student. Knows enough that you know you’re beneath him, but humble enough so that he doesn’t destroy your confidence to learn.

[@DellaWatson-cz3mq]

No we don't

[@marshallstrt401]

I trust science. It’s scientists that I don’t trust.

[@fwabble]

I think this is a worthy comment

[@philwalkercounselling]

Agreed. The scientists and the politicisation of it are issues. The scientific method itself I do not have issues with.

[@TheJZP]

👍

[@cubzzz7176]

Thats fair asf

[@maddscientist1050]

What about them don't you trust?

[@GodPharoh]

That secret service comparison sure aged well

[@YBLunA]

If I give you one cup of rice once, you only have 1 cup of rice. Get it guys?

[@timw2007]

But if you times that 1 cup of rice by another cup of rice... How many cups of rice would you have......I too think 1x1=1 by the way 👍

[@djjaysmoke]

Nope, Terrance says you get 2 cups 😅😅😅

[@YBLunA]

@@timw2007 different variables though. In this case I am using the number 1 as a frequency. 1 cup x once. (something like that😂 I am not a mathematician sorry) . But if you times it with another cup, that is addition already. I think Im right. 😅

[@timw2007]

@YBLunA I'm with you dude 👍

[@Zero_2500]

Mock all you want. I worked in a university for a decade and Eric Weinstein and Terrance Howard are more in line with the spirit of collaborative research that advances science far more than the extremely brittle perspectives of some of the others. When you start to believe that the only people who can give insight on a problem are people who are trained “exactly like you” your progress will stagnate

Priests.

[@tttrrrification]

Yeah, I don't believe you

[@dericnorman7741]

Exactly. Every scientists is trained the same way by people that control their field. Outsiders are condemned or disregarded as not being worthy of audience. Thinking outside the box is how some of the world's best technologies have been invented. Besides all that, it seems as if there is a cancelation campaign being waged against Terrance Howard. He's been ridiculed on almost every media platform for some reason or the other for the past year or so. Ever since he said that African Americans shouldn't have to pay taxes, he's been targeted. Could be a coincidence, but maybe not

[@bpharaoh8765]

Fa sho, fa sho! Folks have lost the thread of what collaboration looks like, nor have any idea what constructive criticism looks like or what it’s value might be.

[@dakinesc09]

Eric said exactly that in the interview though. In The Joe Rogan episode he says word for word. The scientific method does not prove something as true, agreement of peers does. Had he been alive when Galileo was around, he would have been calling Galileo a moron

[@nik07nik]

Love the lemon eating look Piers has when he is reminded of his vacine lunacy

[@TheTruth-im8oq]

😂

[@sb75ification]

He started squirming in his chain! 😂😂😂😂

[@kyle_Neville]

What vaccine lunacy??

[@smokeydiamond489]

He probably milked that too just like all the wars rn

[@tonnictotaltonnic7545]

😆🤭

[@michaelhays7537]

If I purchased two square feet of stone, and it measured one foot wide by one foot long, I'd be asking for the extra square foot.

[@EveK-North]

Please watch Professor Dave discuss this.

[@larryjenks31]

Please don't. He is one of the most caustic and angry podcasters on KZbin. If ever there was a true believer and disciple of science as an infallible arbiter of knowledge, it's "professor" Dave. I've never seen anyone treat science as a religion more than "professor" Dave.

[@KOV12X12]

Solid! No screaming, no interrupting, and zero outrageous clip baiting comments. Cheers lads you just paved the way for polite civil conversation. The only way to reach people.

[@KatJ3st]

Agreed!

[@user-if1ci9kc2f]

Because Piers didn't have clue!!

[@vince7207]

Terrence needed this. Much respect to Eric for how he handled him.

[@President_NotSure]

yeah and short guys can get girlfriends

[@735337707]

I assume you're short​@@President_NotSure

[@MicheleGardini]

The comments are very interesting, they tell you everything you need to know about the mentality you get from following a conservative narrative: delusion and bigotry. Very instructive indeed.

[@CornellRobertson007]

Is shocking how people are so eager and determined to fault someone for trying to make a claim for investigation

[@keepinitkawaii]

Making a claim for "investigation" isn't at all what Terrence was doing lol he called actual facts, false. That's not "investigation".

[@CourageousParenting]

Who died and made these people the gate keepers of peoples’ minds, motivations and lives??? It’s nauseating.🤢

[@kathleen7849]

Nauseating and infuriating.

[@PhotosByDre-b5v]

They’ve gained their positions via education, which we all know is broken…

[@debravictoria7452]

​@@PhotosByDre-b5vAre the funding issues taught in school? Their hands are tied, as far as doing science. They have to please the funders. Journals have to please the advertisers.

[@wl4131]

🙄🥱 if you don’t trust hard science, math and engineering then you should throw your phone in the lake

[@juanmenjivar28]

No one owns mathematics. You can choose to learn it or disregard it. If you disregard it you will think Terrence Howard ramblings are right.

[@Devon6024]

Neil's opinion on the vax told me all I needed to know about his "science".

[@dubjonez1131]

😂😂

[@calicoskyband]

You are against vaccines? How is natural immunity to Polio working out?

[@Forbiddin]

That man is a joke

[@RoniBliss]

100%

[@johnmachter40]

​@@calicoskybandjust stop it already. You made a joke out of yourself the last three years.

[@motormatt5447]

27:30 Love how Erick is just reading his phone while being asked a question from the professor. 😂 legend

[@ansijl]

One of the best debates i have ever listened to. Thanks Piers.

[@TheIrishMugFug]

Eric was 100% right and he opened my eyes to how problematic peer review is

[@kevinbas6756]

Well pure science reviewing led to lockdowns

[@vincentpauly7850]

Peer review is problematic, but the least problematic way proposed that proves to be successful in finding errors and advancing good science.

[@laartwork]

Eric is just mad because he is theory of everything washy much better than Howards.

[@user-se6jh3is3v]

Eric just wants attention. Nothing important said in all his important speech

[@thesanfranciscoseahorse473]

Well, it's working. He's getting attention.

[@DrEMichaelJones]

I'm a man, and I have three kids just like Brigit Macron edit: watch the coping and seething below...

[@craigbannister7826]

So ur female Partner(or ur a female) gave birth 3 times. Good to know

[@SillyGoose2024]

You're a baiter.

[@TJ-um8ce]

So.., you have 3 boys

[@jayr.7209]

​@@SillyGoose2024a master baiter.

[@Chris-mo9gt]

So you’re Brigit Mocron’s babies daddy?

[@metalgreyfox]

Such a breath of fresh air to watch 3 gentlemen give criticism with class and more importantly receive criticism with grace. Stellar.

[@ayronmartin5628]

Saying Terrence Howard is like candace owens and tucker Carlson is diabolical 😂

[@user-cw3gw3ms3l]

Yet Piers believed a load of bollox from Fouchy!

[@etch-a-sketch]

So what!? He is also able to change his mind, which is more important.

[@anch2602]

​He will say what hes paid to say. Piers has shown many times he has no moral character ​@etch-a-sketch

[@henryjumbohead5391]

He doesn’t have a scientific background that would have allowed him to reasonably disagree with him at the time.

[@DecemberNames]

I can NOT believe harvard would let the lady stay after finding out she plagiarized her work! what a time to be alive!

[@shlosher]

Harvard loves plagiarizers.

[@Magneticvortex-kk4gb]

So a woman plagerised the work of another woman named Harvard. Grammar and the use of proper sentences is important in science. It all began in 1875. A then young Newton met a poet named Alfred Mitchell Spencer. Anyway, ask Weinstein to explain the rest. I'm bored.

[@daMillenialTrucker]

​@@Magneticvortex-kk4gbI like rocks

[@robertgadziola1601]

Hahaha, a woman and black.

[@colindooley4422]

Agreed. But none of that has to do with Terrance being nutty af and Candace is an insufferable grifter

[@ephraimetuk9670]

this is the best interview i've watched on Uncensored

[@HaRv3yD3nT]

Yes, lets ask a Podcaster...they always know what they're talking about

[@massimilianperetti7331]

Eric Weinstein's stance was the right way to approach the conversation. Pseudo-scientists sadly won't go away, and I respect Eric's attempt to clarify the issue with the hope that it will be well received. Reason vs online bullying.

[@BlaqAdam]

I mean Neil did the same thing and Terrence ran to JRE to cry about it. He gave him an actual peer review.

[@justamangoddamn]

I'll trust dr weinstein, the man is openminded.

[@nicolavincenzo7927]

Eric is awesome so is this Tom character

[@RochusMr]

@@BlaqAdamPeer review 😆

[@vimal-cliobconsulting]

​@@nicolavincenzo7927he's an entrepreneur

[@johnmcgowen3641]

The scientific communities' silence around DEI for fears of losing funding have led the populace to believe that science can't discern between men and women and, therefore, are untrustworthy.

[@anthonynicholson5523]

No

[@smooth_pursuit]

That and the covid debacle

[@aquireeverything9382]

Replication Crisis woke many people up

[@Dmenjivar22]

What’s DEI

[@johnmcgowen3641]

@@Dmenjivar22 Diversity Equaty Inclusion

[@rodk691]

When the establishment can't control the narrative of science.....

[@johnny546]

Eric obviously has the balls in this conversation

[@doseofreality420marianetti2]

Piers Morgan show is the epitome of the Dunning Kruger Effect

[@liammorgans7329]

Why? You dont think these guys have legitimate credentials?

[@user-qk2rt1cn2s]

As is your comment

[@HandMeDeals]

Western credentials ​@@liammorgans7329

[@Si_Mondo]

What? You can't be referring to Eric! Maybe Piers, but not Eric. 😂

[@pacmanmcgavin7034]

You must be a vegan...

[@joaquina.fineline8893]

Eric did a great job on Rogan. He handled the situation with class. Any “scientist” that criticizes him for that is filled with hubris and sanctimony. Snobbery doesn’t gain any points. I appreciate Eric W.

[@dreamingmusic3299]

Well don't you know that it's not actually science unless there's hubris, condescension, haughtiness and snobbery?

[@user-ct8tc2dd9v]

lol, no he didn't. He made a complete fool of himself, sounding like an upset child.

[@tnndll4294]

If he debunked Terrence Howard, then I wish more people would do that. Instead of thinking they are "above it all".

[@MCFCTheMadHatter]

I’d add jealousy to the list as well

[@Dedicated_.1]

@@user-ct8tc2dd9vdid an amazing job - pointing out flaws, showed areas of promise, didn’t come across as arrogant. Well done Eric.

[@ambitionbaby6329]

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE NAME ONE THING Eric or Neil has accomplished? T.H has over 80 patents

[@Trichocereus1]

I trust in the scientific method - but not in all of acadenia.

[@TehDanno1]

I love that, Dr. Eric isn't afraid to think outside of the box and explore with his mind. Unlike many of his colleagues.

[@acv5700]

Seems scientific.

[@user-rp6xs1qr3s]

😂lol Eric is tryna tell us that 'Science' is only really science when it's peer-reviewed by 'the house of Lords' whom are their own echo chamber😂😂😂 FOH

[@austinlincoln3414]

Real science gets peer reviewed, and it’s not just an echo chamber

[@CC.DeVille]

The guy wasted 4 hours on a clown and looked like a clown himself. Tyson's approach was completely the right one.

[@anacc3257]

@@CC.DeVille Eric didn't look like a clown lol did you even watch the Rogan episode?

[@solomondthomas]

I actually wanted the peer review debate to keep going...

[@Chad-bp3hm]

Everybody did. the dude with the glasses ruined it.

[@MrBalockaye]

Yea, he was out of pocket with that interruption. Not sure why they invited him.

[@crushinnihilism]

​@@MrBalockayebecause hes an influential billionaire

[@Rivajay]

Grateful someone said this. Ugh!

[@Cushpot]

@@solomondthomas yeah it's funny seeing Eric's waffle get some serious pushback. He tends to turn into an angry baby when that happens, like what happened in his debate with Mick West

[@mindhunter8772]

Eric Weinstein just alluded to what Terrence Howard discovered at the 16:30 minute mark...

[@ENKI-THE-GOD]

Yes 🎉

[@AB-80X]

Weinstein is a clown. He knows way too little and is as ignorant as Howard.

[@IosuamacaMhadaidh]

Love how the title makes you think Eric calls Terrance unhinged

[@fuzzball297]

He does.

[@Tenzin62]

If Universities remain so expensive, leaving kids interested in science, philosophy and many other subjects. Then they will learn at home.

[@drmantistoboggan2870]

they wont learn, they will think they learn 😂

[@davemartino5997]

@@drmantistoboggan2870you Can be self taught in. Some disciplines

[@GingerDrums]

Great comment

[@AKMcF]

@@drmantistoboggan2870The smart ones will learn to think.

[@drmantistoboggan2870]

@@AKMcF will they? or will they think they know how to think? how will not be affected by dunning kruger if they cant bounce ideas of others?

[@Namaste1001]

Anything that threatens mainstream narratives is attacked.

[@CreamedCorn2002]

So deep. Society exposed wake up sheeple

[@factsnchill168]

Math is math 😂🤣😂😂 I guarantee you never studied it past early years schooling

[@Jmaug]

​@factsnchill168 how much math have you studied? I remember learning new methods of multication and division that have been taught in history that are easier than what we teach, but out schools would never use them

[@antoniobatista8009]

Easy use Terrence Howard's "Science" and see where you can go with you narrative. Lol

[@Rodrifuuu]

1 x 1 = 1 is a "mainstream narrative"? LOL

[@WONNESS]

You Can’t Shake Eric! His Character is Amazing

[@andrewhorizon8066]

It's not about "peer" review....but "Piers" review!!

[@cowboy41231]

Neil degrasse Tyson is the most pompous arrogant scientist on the public front 😂

[@is-ness]

You’re 180 degrees off

[@scottpalmer053]

Totally agree 💯

[@pricklycats]

I mean that’s kind of unavoidable for any human who is worshipped like he is lol

[@pinkharrier47]

What is his most significant scientific contribution (aside from media)?

[@sfall616]

​@pricklycats nobody worshipping that nihher

[@uzimachi1]

I lost all my respect for Neil when he got woke, he basically said gender is a spectrum, what a clown. At least Terrence is being bold to breakthrough the limits of science. Isaac Newton was bold, Einstein was bold. Neil is just a clown who repeats whatever some "Expert" says.

[@records1990]

💯💯💯💯

[@davidphinn9646]

People need to stop calling every crazy, extreme wing thought "woke", just because they only have so many characters to say whatever and it's conveniently one syllable and 4 letters. If woke itself could speak, it would be cussing out everybody. Find another word already🙄😸

[@MrCmoney1211]

According to you, Scientists and phds are “experts” and clowns. Actors with no training and hobbyist are being bold and finding breakthroughs in physics….Brilliant. Stay in school kids.

[@stevrgrs]

It’s because of his kids. Personal feelings vs science :P

[@jordantamyl]

well that's what science says. he didn't make it up. just as the sense of smell or sense of taste is a spectrum, its slightly different for everyone

[@user-qy4rr6wn4g]

The 'peer review' disagreement between Eric and Brian amused me. They clearly just had different definitions of what a peer review was. Eric even said that before the 60s and/or 70s, there was no peer review in the 'modern sense'. Brian took the position that the purpose and benefit of what Eric calls peer review was satisfied by a marginally different process.

[@williameaton7813]

Why can’t we all just go watch Coneheads?? Please??